"Unlock the Secrets of Team Dynamics with 'Teams - Smart and Dumb Teams' In this insightful presentation, we delve deep into the world of teams, exploring the fascinating nuances that distinguish smart teams from their not-so-smart counterparts. Discover the key attributes, strategies, and pitfalls that can make or break a team's success. Whether you're a leader, team member, or simply curious about team dynamics, this presentation offers valuable insights and actionable tips to help you build and lead effective, high-performing teams. Join us on this journey to understand what truly makes a team thrive or falter. Are you ready to transform your team into a smart, efficient, and collaborative force? Let's get started!"

1. SMART TEAMS &
SMART TEAMS &
DUMB TEAMS
DUMB TEAMS
SHUBHAM BAJAJ - V23032
SMITA SINGH - V23033
SONAL RAJESH - V23034

2. Some individual traits can also be applicable to teams -
Openness, Smart, Dumb
Smartness or dumbness has nothing to do with average IQ
of the team.
CASE
CASE
SUMMARY:-
SUMMARY:-
Smart Teams
-Logical analysis
-Brainstorming
-Coordination
-Planning
-Moral reasoning
Dumb Teams
-Unproductive meetings
-Social loafing
-Interpersonal conflicts
Smart Teams findings:
1) No individual member dominate
2) Have more members who were able to read minds
3) Have more women

3. QUESTION
QUESTION 1
1
1. From your experiences in teams, do you agree
with the researchers’ findings on the
characteristics of smart teams?
Why or why not?
Smart team did not allow individual members to dominate.
Smart teams had more members who are able to read
minds.
Smart teams had more women.

4. On the highly functioning teams in
which you’ve been a member, what
other characteristics might have
contributed to success?
QUESTION 2
QUESTION 2
Diverse Skillsets and Perspectives.
Commitment to Quality
Adaptability and Resilience
Trust, accountability and reliability.
Effective Collaboration & open
Communication
Conflict Resolution
Division of work
Effective time management

5. QUESTION 3
QUESTION 3
The authors who suggested that membership in a
team makes us smarter, found that teams were more
rational and quicker at finding solutions to difficult
probability problems and reasoning tasks than were
individuals.
After participation in the study, team members were
much better at decision making on their own, even up
to 5 weeks later.
Do you think this spillover effect would happen
equally for people in smart teams and dumb teams?
Why or why not?

6. Team Composition
Team Composition
Abilities of members- performance
depends on knowledge, skills and abilities
of members.
Personalities of members- the big five
model(conscientious, openness,
emotional stability, agreeableness)
Diversity of members-diversity negetively
affects team performance

7. Allocation of roles
TEAMS
Creator
Advisor
Maintainer
Promoter
Assessor
Controller
Organizer
Producer
Linker

8. size of team- 5-9 is ideal
excess members,
cohesiveness and mutual accountability
declines, social loafing increases,
communication decreases, especially
under time pressure

9. Team or not?
Team or not?
CAN WORK BE DONE BETTER BY MORE THAN
ONE PERSON?
INTERDEPENDENT MEMBERS
more time and resources, increased communication
demands, conflict management and meetings.
DOES WORK CREATES COMMON GOALS?

10. THANKYOU