1. HSNS 366 Assignment 1 Part B Marking Criteria-Ethical Case Review
Marking criteria Achievement level Mark
Ethical review
 Completion of Smart Sparrow learning module and Conducts a
comprehensive review of principles
 Discusses relevant ethical principles and Applies principles
appropriately to the ethical case
SS 2.5/2.5
7/10
Teamwork
 Identifies relevant factors and processes for successful teamwork
 Discusses strategies that can be used in health contexts and
Relates/recommends strategies for the ethical case 8/10
Content
 Clear identification, definition and explanation of central concepts
 Evidence of focused reading and research to locate and develop
knowledge of key topic areas
Analysis
 Logical development and application of ideas to the topic
 Review of current and relevant literature to support thoughts and
ideas
 Thoughtful analysis and discussion integrating information from the
evidence-based literature and synthesizing responses to key topic
area
9/10
Provisional mark /30
DEDUCTIONS are applied for the following:
 Inappropriate presentation, grammar, punctuation, spelling and
referencing
 Minimal or extended word limit (maximum 10% leeway)
 Poor formatting and/or presentation
 Failure to check/edit spelling, grammar and punctuation errors
 Incorrect/incomplete referencing
Final mark 24/30
Assessed by: Becky Broomfield
Comments: Hi Selena
You made some really good observations with your four of the principles but all six
principles applied. You demonstrated you understood them very well. Please read my
feedback. Remember to use your NMBA codes and be careful when you think about using

2. HSNS 366 Assignment 1 Part B Marking Criteria-Ethical Case Review
the word violate. You must remain non-judgmental and be aware of legal aspects as well
as ethical ones.
You discussed some important issues especially collaboration. You worked very hard and
read around the topic. Ideally you would have also discussed about the debriefing and
reflection which is part of Hawle’s model