This document summarizes survey response rates, student outcomes, framework elements, and essential supports for P.S. 147 Isaac Remsen elementary school. It includes data from the 2014-2015 school year on teacher and parent survey response rates, student achievement levels, quality review ratings, and survey results on areas like rigorous instruction, collaborative teachers, and supportive environment.

1. Framework for Great Schools Report 2016 Survey Response Rates
Teachers: 92%
School Type: Elementary School Students: N/A
Parents: 95%
Key Student Outcomes (2014-15)
Score 14K147 Comparison Group
4.14 Student Achievement Rating (EMS)
4.60 Meeting Target
3.94 Percent at Level 3 or 4 - English
4.66 15.8% 17.0%
4.47 Percent at Level 3 or 4 - Math
4.32 20.2% 25.4%
Framework Elements
Measures 14K147 Citywide Average
1
Score
Rigorous Instruction
NYC School Survey
● Common Core Shifts in Literacy (T) 99 90 4.87
● Common Core Shifts in Math (T) 100 91 4.99
Course Clarity 86
Quality of Student Discussion (T) 77 73 3.41
92 85 4.42
Quality Review (2014-2015)
How interesting and challenging is the curriculum? (1.1) Proficient 3.50
How effective is the teaching and learning? (1.2) Proficient 3.50
● How well does the school assess what students are learning? (2.2) Well Developed 4.99
Collaborative Teachers
NYC School Survey
● Cultural Awareness and Inclusive Classroom Instruction (T, P) 99 94 4.76
● Quality of Professional Development (T) 92 76 4.48
● School Commitment (T) 96 79 4.72
Innovation (T) 78 79 3.27
● Peer Collaboration (T) 97 89 4.65
Collective Responsibility (T) 82 83 3.33
91 83 4.20
Quality Review (2014-2015)
● How well do teachers work with each other? (4.2) Well Developed 4.99
Supportive Environment
NYC School Survey
● Safety (T) 98 88 4.82
Classroom Behavior (T) 78 74 3.46
Social-Emotional (T) 87 85 3.70
Peer Support for Academic Work (T) 83 81 3.61
Personal Attention and Support 77
Academic Press (T) 82 78 3.78
Guidance
86 81 3.87
Quality Review (2014-2015)
● How clearly are high expectations communicated to students and staff? (3.4) Well Developed 4.99
Other
2
Percentage of students with 90%+ attendance (from 2014-15) 71% 78% 3.29
○ Less Restrictive Environment (from 2014-15) 0.13 0.29 1.93
● Filled circle indicates strong areas, where the school achieved a score of 4.00 or higher.
○ Empty circle indicates areas for growth, where the school the school achieved a score below 2.00.
14K147 - P.S. 147 Isaac Remsen
Metric Values
Survey results are presented as percent
positive responses (%).
4 - 4.99 3 - 3.99 2 - 2.99 1 - 1.99KEY:

2. Essential Supports
Measures 14K147 Citywide Average
1
Score
Effective School Leadership
NYC School Survey
● Inclusive Leadership (P) 97 93 4.33
● Teacher Influence (T) 91 78 4.40
● Program Coherence (T) 99 83 4.92
● Instructional Leadership (T) 100 86 4.99
97 85 4.66
Strong Family-Community Ties
NYC School Survey
● Outreach to Parents (T, P) 98 94 4.56
● Parent Involvement in School (P) 94 87 4.37
96 91 4.47
Trust
NYC School Survey
● Teacher-Parent Trust (P) 98 95 4.27
● Parent-Principal Trust (P) 97 93 4.37
Student-Teacher Trust 83
● Teacher-Principal Trust (T) 99 81 4.93
Teacher-Teacher Trust (T) 88 87 3.70
96 88 4.32
Notes
1 The citywide averages are among the same school type only (not among all school types).
2
QR
S Question-level results for the NYC School Survey will be available later in the summer.
● Filled circle indicates strong areas, where the school achieved a score of 4.00 or higher.
○ Empty circle indicates areas for growth, where the school the school achieved a score below 2.00.
Links
Framework Report Technical Guide
http://schools.nyc.gov/NR/rdonlyres/545A70F8-38FD-430C-948B-3F6067665420/0/FrameworkReportTechnicalGuide692016.pdf
School Quality Guide
http://schools.nyc.gov/OA/SchoolReports/2014-15/School_Quality_Guide_2015_EMS_K147.pdf
* Key Student Outcomes (2013-14)
14K147 school target
1
N/A
FALSE
FALSE FALSE
FALSE
FALSE FALSE
Student Progress Rating (EMS)
Meeting Target
Percent at Level 3 or 4 - English
N/A N/A
Percent at Level 3 or 4 - Math
N/A N/A
For the School Quality Guides, the percentage of students with 90%+ attendance and least restrictive environment metrics are calculated separately for EMS
grades and HS grades. In this Framework Report, if a school spans both EMS and HS grades, the EMS and HS values (and scores) are averaged into one school value
(and score).
Quality Review data are not available for all schools at the time of report publication. A school's most recent published ratings are included if the review took place
after August 2013. Schools that opened within the last three years and schools whose most recent review took place before August 2013 may not have updated
data. Quality Review reports published after May 19, 2016 were not available to be included in the production of this Framework Report. The 2015-16 School
Quality Reports, scheduled to be released in Fall 2016, will include this additional 2015-16 Quality Review data.
Metric Values
Survey results are presented as percent
positive responses (%).