SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
The Galileo Project > Science > On Motion

On Motion

During the time he taught the mathematical subjects at the university of Pisa
(1589-1592), Galileo began a book, De motu ("On motion"), which was never published.
In it, we can trace the early development of his ideas concerning motion.

One of the fundamental propositions of Aristotelian philosophy is that there is no effect
without a cause. Applied to moving bodies, this proposition dictates that there is no
motion without a force. Speed, then is proportional to force and inversely proportional to
resistance. This notion is not at all unreasonable if one takes as one's defining case of
motion, say, an ox pulling a cart: the cart only moves if the ox pulls, and when the ox
stops pulling the cart stops. For falling bodies, the force is the weight pulling down a
body and the resistance is that of the medium, air or water. As the science of motion
became somewhat more quantitative in the sixteenth century, some people began to
investigate the motion of falling bodies more carefully. Galileo was one of these.

If weight determines the speed of fall, then when two different weights are dropped from
a high place the heavier will fall faster and the lighter slower, in proportion to the two
weights. A ten pound weight would reach the Earth by the time a one-pound weight had
fallen one-tenth as far.

One approach was to speculate: suppose one connected the two weights with a string,
what would be the speed of fall? Suppose one tied them together? In the first case the
lighter weight would slow down the heavier one and therefore the time of fall would be
greater than that of the heavier weight; in the second case there now was a composite
body weighing eleven pounds, whose time of fall would be less than that of the ten-pound
weight. Perhaps weight was not the determiner of the speed of fall.

But there was another approach, one of experience. Why not drop bodies of different
weights and see whether Aristotle's prediction was correct. As early as 1544, the historian
Benedetto Varchi referred to actual tests, which showed that it was not. In a tract written
in 1576, Giuseppe Moletti, Galileo's predecessor in the chair of mathematics at the
university of Padua, reported that bodies of the same material but different weight, as
well as bodies of the same volume but different material, dropped from a height arrived at
the Earth at the same time.

Galileo's approach to this problem was somewhat different. In De motu he proposed that
in free fall bodies dropped with a characteristic uniform speed determined not by their
weight but by their specific gravity (not his term). He put this theory to the test by
dropping bodies from heights and found that the experiments did not confirm his theory.
He states that, in fact, the lighter body (i.e. that of the lower specific gravity) will move
ahead of the heavier body at the start of the fall, and that the heavier body then overtakes
it and arrives at the bottom slightly earlier.
Scholars have pointed to such passages to support their argument that Galileo did not
perform such experiments and that his references to experiments were only rhetorical
devices. After all, we all know that in a vacuum all bodies would fall with the same speed
and in a medium such as air the heavier body (assuming the two bodies are of the same
shape) will fall slightly faster: at no time will the lighter body be ahead of the heavier
one. But when Galileo's supposed experiment was repeated, the results showed that he
had described a real experiment. Students dropped spherical balls of wood and iron of
equal diameter and the wooden balls invariably moved ahead of the iron balls. The
explanation lies in the fact that the heavier iron ball must be clasped in the hand with
more force and is therefore released slightly later than the wooden ball.

Obviously, then, Galileo was performing experiments at the very beginning of his
investigations into motion, and he took his experimental results seriously. Over the next
two decades he changed his ideas and refined his experiments, and in the end he arrived
at the law of falling bodies which states that in a vacuum all bodies, regardless of their
weight, shape, or specific gravity, are uniformly accelerated in exactly the same way, and
that the distance fallen is proportional to the square of the elapsed time.

Sources: Thomas B. Settle, "Galileo and Early Experimentation," in Springs of Scientific
Creativity: Essays on Founders of Modern Science, ed. Rutherford Aris, H. Ted Davis,
and Roger H. Stuewer (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1983), pp. 3-20;
idem, "Experimental Research and Galilean Mechanics," in Galileo Scientist: His Years
at Padua and Venice, ed. Milla Baldo Ceolin (Padua: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica
Nucleare; Venice: Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti; Padua: Dip artimento di
Fisica, 1992), pp. 39-57.

http://galileo.rice.edu/sci/theories/on_motion.html

More Related Content

What's hot (8)

Free fall
Free fallFree fall
Free fall
 
Energy in Society
Energy in SocietyEnergy in Society
Energy in Society
 
Gravity and orbits
Gravity and orbitsGravity and orbits
Gravity and orbits
 
Falling bodies
Falling bodiesFalling bodies
Falling bodies
 
Archimedes Principle
Archimedes PrincipleArchimedes Principle
Archimedes Principle
 
Archimedes principle
Archimedes principleArchimedes principle
Archimedes principle
 
Laws of Motion
Laws of MotionLaws of Motion
Laws of Motion
 
ARCHIMEDES' PRINCIPLE
ARCHIMEDES' PRINCIPLEARCHIMEDES' PRINCIPLE
ARCHIMEDES' PRINCIPLE
 

Viewers also liked (7)

ESAUnit2.ppt
ESAUnit2.pptESAUnit2.ppt
ESAUnit2.ppt
 
Gravity and motion
Gravity and motionGravity and motion
Gravity and motion
 
004 free fall
004 free fall004 free fall
004 free fall
 
Force and laws of motion
Force and laws of motionForce and laws of motion
Force and laws of motion
 
Physics chapter 3 2012
Physics chapter 3 2012Physics chapter 3 2012
Physics chapter 3 2012
 
Ch2 part 1-motion
Ch2 part 1-motionCh2 part 1-motion
Ch2 part 1-motion
 
Monkey & banana problem in AI
Monkey & banana problem in AIMonkey & banana problem in AI
Monkey & banana problem in AI
 

Similar to The galileo project

The Birth of Modern Science Galileo andDescartes , a lectur.docx
The Birth of Modern Science Galileo andDescartes , a lectur.docxThe Birth of Modern Science Galileo andDescartes , a lectur.docx
The Birth of Modern Science Galileo andDescartes , a lectur.docx
mattinsonjanel
 
Presentation1
Presentation1Presentation1
Presentation1
ghelhie
 
How did our understanding of gravity change over
How did our understanding of gravity change overHow did our understanding of gravity change over
How did our understanding of gravity change over
lprohaska
 
How galileo galilei changed the world
How galileo galilei changed the worldHow galileo galilei changed the world
How galileo galilei changed the world
todspedding
 

Similar to The galileo project (20)

Habermel Galileo on Motion 09898277.pptx
Habermel Galileo on Motion 09898277.pptxHabermel Galileo on Motion 09898277.pptx
Habermel Galileo on Motion 09898277.pptx
 
ALBERT EINSTEIN.pdf
ALBERT EINSTEIN.pdfALBERT EINSTEIN.pdf
ALBERT EINSTEIN.pdf
 
The Birth of Modern Science Galileo andDescartes , a lectur.docx
The Birth of Modern Science Galileo andDescartes , a lectur.docxThe Birth of Modern Science Galileo andDescartes , a lectur.docx
The Birth of Modern Science Galileo andDescartes , a lectur.docx
 
Galileo Galilei
Galileo GalileiGalileo Galilei
Galileo Galilei
 
Presentation1
Presentation1Presentation1
Presentation1
 
Gravity 2
Gravity 2Gravity 2
Gravity 2
 
History backgorund
History backgorundHistory backgorund
History backgorund
 
Gravity for kids
Gravity for kidsGravity for kids
Gravity for kids
 
Galileo Lecture
Galileo LectureGalileo Lecture
Galileo Lecture
 
Galileo galilei
Galileo galileiGalileo galilei
Galileo galilei
 
9th EM biography of galileo galilei.pdf
9th EM biography of galileo galilei.pdf9th EM biography of galileo galilei.pdf
9th EM biography of galileo galilei.pdf
 
Scientific Revolution
Scientific RevolutionScientific Revolution
Scientific Revolution
 
8th grade scientific revolutio
8th grade scientific revolutio8th grade scientific revolutio
8th grade scientific revolutio
 
Galileo Superstitions
Galileo SuperstitionsGalileo Superstitions
Galileo Superstitions
 
Galileo
GalileoGalileo
Galileo
 
Jm honors pt 1 this one missing you
Jm honors pt 1 this one missing youJm honors pt 1 this one missing you
Jm honors pt 1 this one missing you
 
How did our understanding of gravity change over
How did our understanding of gravity change overHow did our understanding of gravity change over
How did our understanding of gravity change over
 
How galileo galilei changed the world
How galileo galilei changed the worldHow galileo galilei changed the world
How galileo galilei changed the world
 
M.gomu,e.esakki,m.dt
M.gomu,e.esakki,m.dtM.gomu,e.esakki,m.dt
M.gomu,e.esakki,m.dt
 
scientific revolution
scientific revolutionscientific revolution
scientific revolution
 

More from Sabiq Hafidz

Were bacteria first form
Were bacteria first formWere bacteria first form
Were bacteria first form
Sabiq Hafidz
 
Tutorial fraktal dan fractal sharp
Tutorial fraktal dan fractal sharpTutorial fraktal dan fractal sharp
Tutorial fraktal dan fractal sharp
Sabiq Hafidz
 
The wonder of the brain
The wonder of the brainThe wonder of the brain
The wonder of the brain
Sabiq Hafidz
 
The standar model of fermion
The standar model of fermionThe standar model of fermion
The standar model of fermion
Sabiq Hafidz
 
The science and religion dialogue
The science and religion dialogueThe science and religion dialogue
The science and religion dialogue
Sabiq Hafidz
 
The problem with intelligent design william grassie
The problem with intelligent design   william grassieThe problem with intelligent design   william grassie
The problem with intelligent design william grassie
Sabiq Hafidz
 
The panorama of creation
The panorama of creationThe panorama of creation
The panorama of creation
Sabiq Hafidz
 
The endless universe
The endless universeThe endless universe
The endless universe
Sabiq Hafidz
 
Self organizing system
Self organizing systemSelf organizing system
Self organizing system
Sabiq Hafidz
 
Science and religion in big bang
Science and religion in big bangScience and religion in big bang
Science and religion in big bang
Sabiq Hafidz
 
Revolusi kisah baru
Revolusi kisah baruRevolusi kisah baru
Revolusi kisah baru
Sabiq Hafidz
 

More from Sabiq Hafidz (20)

Wolfram 3
Wolfram 3Wolfram 3
Wolfram 3
 
Wolfram 2
Wolfram 2Wolfram 2
Wolfram 2
 
Wolfram 1
Wolfram 1Wolfram 1
Wolfram 1
 
What is the quark
What is the quarkWhat is the quark
What is the quark
 
Werner heisenberg
Werner heisenbergWerner heisenberg
Werner heisenberg
 
Werner heisenber1
Werner heisenber1Werner heisenber1
Werner heisenber1
 
Were bacteria first form
Were bacteria first formWere bacteria first form
Were bacteria first form
 
Unifying concept
Unifying conceptUnifying concept
Unifying concept
 
Tutorial fraktal dan fractal sharp
Tutorial fraktal dan fractal sharpTutorial fraktal dan fractal sharp
Tutorial fraktal dan fractal sharp
 
The wonder of the brain
The wonder of the brainThe wonder of the brain
The wonder of the brain
 
The standar model of fermion
The standar model of fermionThe standar model of fermion
The standar model of fermion
 
The science and religion dialogue
The science and religion dialogueThe science and religion dialogue
The science and religion dialogue
 
The problem with intelligent design william grassie
The problem with intelligent design   william grassieThe problem with intelligent design   william grassie
The problem with intelligent design william grassie
 
The panorama of creation
The panorama of creationThe panorama of creation
The panorama of creation
 
The endless universe
The endless universeThe endless universe
The endless universe
 
The brain
The brainThe brain
The brain
 
Self organizing system
Self organizing systemSelf organizing system
Self organizing system
 
Science and religion in big bang
Science and religion in big bangScience and religion in big bang
Science and religion in big bang
 
Revolusi kisah baru
Revolusi kisah baruRevolusi kisah baru
Revolusi kisah baru
 
Origin
OriginOrigin
Origin
 

The galileo project

  • 1. The Galileo Project > Science > On Motion On Motion During the time he taught the mathematical subjects at the university of Pisa (1589-1592), Galileo began a book, De motu ("On motion"), which was never published. In it, we can trace the early development of his ideas concerning motion. One of the fundamental propositions of Aristotelian philosophy is that there is no effect without a cause. Applied to moving bodies, this proposition dictates that there is no motion without a force. Speed, then is proportional to force and inversely proportional to resistance. This notion is not at all unreasonable if one takes as one's defining case of motion, say, an ox pulling a cart: the cart only moves if the ox pulls, and when the ox stops pulling the cart stops. For falling bodies, the force is the weight pulling down a body and the resistance is that of the medium, air or water. As the science of motion became somewhat more quantitative in the sixteenth century, some people began to investigate the motion of falling bodies more carefully. Galileo was one of these. If weight determines the speed of fall, then when two different weights are dropped from a high place the heavier will fall faster and the lighter slower, in proportion to the two weights. A ten pound weight would reach the Earth by the time a one-pound weight had fallen one-tenth as far. One approach was to speculate: suppose one connected the two weights with a string, what would be the speed of fall? Suppose one tied them together? In the first case the lighter weight would slow down the heavier one and therefore the time of fall would be greater than that of the heavier weight; in the second case there now was a composite body weighing eleven pounds, whose time of fall would be less than that of the ten-pound weight. Perhaps weight was not the determiner of the speed of fall. But there was another approach, one of experience. Why not drop bodies of different weights and see whether Aristotle's prediction was correct. As early as 1544, the historian Benedetto Varchi referred to actual tests, which showed that it was not. In a tract written in 1576, Giuseppe Moletti, Galileo's predecessor in the chair of mathematics at the university of Padua, reported that bodies of the same material but different weight, as well as bodies of the same volume but different material, dropped from a height arrived at the Earth at the same time. Galileo's approach to this problem was somewhat different. In De motu he proposed that in free fall bodies dropped with a characteristic uniform speed determined not by their weight but by their specific gravity (not his term). He put this theory to the test by dropping bodies from heights and found that the experiments did not confirm his theory. He states that, in fact, the lighter body (i.e. that of the lower specific gravity) will move ahead of the heavier body at the start of the fall, and that the heavier body then overtakes it and arrives at the bottom slightly earlier.
  • 2. Scholars have pointed to such passages to support their argument that Galileo did not perform such experiments and that his references to experiments were only rhetorical devices. After all, we all know that in a vacuum all bodies would fall with the same speed and in a medium such as air the heavier body (assuming the two bodies are of the same shape) will fall slightly faster: at no time will the lighter body be ahead of the heavier one. But when Galileo's supposed experiment was repeated, the results showed that he had described a real experiment. Students dropped spherical balls of wood and iron of equal diameter and the wooden balls invariably moved ahead of the iron balls. The explanation lies in the fact that the heavier iron ball must be clasped in the hand with more force and is therefore released slightly later than the wooden ball. Obviously, then, Galileo was performing experiments at the very beginning of his investigations into motion, and he took his experimental results seriously. Over the next two decades he changed his ideas and refined his experiments, and in the end he arrived at the law of falling bodies which states that in a vacuum all bodies, regardless of their weight, shape, or specific gravity, are uniformly accelerated in exactly the same way, and that the distance fallen is proportional to the square of the elapsed time. Sources: Thomas B. Settle, "Galileo and Early Experimentation," in Springs of Scientific Creativity: Essays on Founders of Modern Science, ed. Rutherford Aris, H. Ted Davis, and Roger H. Stuewer (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1983), pp. 3-20; idem, "Experimental Research and Galilean Mechanics," in Galileo Scientist: His Years at Padua and Venice, ed. Milla Baldo Ceolin (Padua: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; Venice: Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti; Padua: Dip artimento di Fisica, 1992), pp. 39-57. http://galileo.rice.edu/sci/theories/on_motion.html