This is a presentation for Evaluate a systematic study which is given to me as assignment .So I want to share it for all , and any one can reuse the templates. Thank you Wardah Alamri

1. Evaluation
Of
A systematic
Literature
Review
Wardah Alamri

2. Page
1
Title of research
"A Systematic Review of
Remote Laboratory Work
in Science Education with
the Support of Visualizing
its Structure through the
HistCite and CiteSpace
Software"
15 March 2016
New trends in Education
Technology
Wardah Alamri
Supervisor: Dr.Fadwaa
King Abdul-Aziz university /Higher
Education
2020

3. Page
3
Page
2
Remote lab and Virtual
lab
Remote lab and Virtual
lab

4. Page
5
Page
4
My comments
Evaluation questions
Title??
Does the title identify
variables?
Does the theoretical issues under
investigation ?
Is there a relationship
between them?
Rating:
"A Systematic Review of
Remote Laboratory Work in
Science Education with the
Support of Visualizing its
Structure through the HistCite
and CiteSpace Software“
√√√

5. Page
7
Page
6
Evaluation questions
Importance/timeliness of
topic
relation to the field of
educational technology ?
Is the topic timely?
publication of this
research serve to advance
the field?
Rating:
Related √
modern & timely√
served to advance
the field to some
extent. √
My comments

6. Page
9
Page
8
My comments
Evaluation questions
General quality of writing
rating quality of
writing?
APA format?
Grammar?
Academic language?
Rating:
The APA format was
followed in the study.
Grammar of writing was
considered.
Academic language was
considered.

7. Page
11
Page
10
My comments
Evaluation questions
Introduction and
theoretical framework
Introduction to the
problem?
Evidence of theoretical
framework research?
Research questions ?
Rating:
The introduction was provided
appropriately.
yes, through providing it the
RLs in Science Education and
Systematic Review with the
Support of HistCite and
CiteSpace Software.
They emerged logically based
to address a gap in the
literature.

8. Page
13
Page
12
My comments
Evaluation questions
Literature review
Is there appropriate LR in
framing the introduction
?
Is it current?
Any significant topics /
authors omitted ?
Rating:
The author cited the
appropriate LR.
LR current in the
research.
No significant topics or
authors omitted from .

9. Page
15
Page
14
My comments
Evaluation questions
Research methods/results
Methods for answering the
research questions?
Sample size?
Empirical studies included?
Procedures to analyze the
data?
Tables and figures ?
Are the data less than two
years old?
Rating:
Analytical descriptive method
appropriated.
Not sufficient.
Enough empirical studies
included
Appropriated.
provided and appropriated.
Not less than two years old.

10. Page
17
Page
16
My comments
Evaluation questions
Conclusion/discussion
Conclusions & data?
Any limitations?
Research implications for
future research?
Rating:
The conclusion was grounded in
the data firmly.
The author didn't identify
limitations .
He addressed research
implications for practice and
future research.

11. Page
19
Page
18
Importance of a systematic
literature review
RL Labs improvements
Many useful studies
Software (Hiscite &
citespace)
Productive results &
suggestions
Encouraging to research
more in this area
Virtual labs maybe the next
destination

12. Thank
You
For
Listenin
g
Wardah Alamri