This document discusses freedom of association and the right to form labor unions under Article 19 of the Indian Constitution. It provides 4 key court judgements on this issue:
1) Forming labor unions is a fundamental right, but striking is not considered a fundamental right. Unions only have a right to form, not to strike or engage in effective collective bargaining.
2) Government employees do not have a right to strike.
3) The right to strike is not considered a fundamental right. A rule prohibiting demonstrations and strikes by government servants was upheld.
4) The document then provides a brief historical overview of trade union development in India from 1918-1994, noting a decline in membership in the
5. Freedom to form associations
Article 19
Article 19(1) [ All citizens shall have
the right]-
(c) to form associations or
unions or co-operative
societies.*
* āor co-operative societiesā
added in 2011 by 97th
Amendment Act.
Article 19(4)
Nothing in sub-clause (c) of the said clause shall
affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it
imposes, or prevent the State from making any law
imposing, in the interests of the sovereignty and
integrity of India or public order or morality,
reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right
conferred by the said sub-clause.
6. Here are 4 important court judgements which every worker or employee should be aware of:
Forming Labour Unions or Associations is a Fundamental Right but strike is not..
In All India Bank Employeesā Association v. National Industrial Tribunal , the Court specifically held that even
very liberal interpretation of sub-clause (c)of clause (1) of Article 19 cannot lead to the conclusion that trade
unions have a guaranteed right to an effective collective bargaining or to strike, either as part of collective
bargaining or otherwise. Thus, there is a guaranteed fundamental right to form association or Labour
unions but there is no fundamental right to go on strike. Under the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 the ground
and conditions are laid down for the legal strike and if those provisions and conditions are not fulfilled then the
strike will be illegal.
No Right to Strike for Government Employees
In the case of T.K. Rangarajan v. Government of Tamil Nadu and Others (the Tamil Nadu Government
Employees Case), Justice M.B. Shah, speaking for a Bench of the Supreme Court consisting of himself and
Justice A.R. Lakshmanan, said, āthe question of right to strike ā whether fundamental, statutory or
equitable moral right to strike ā in our view, no such right exists with the government employee.ā
Right to Strike is not a Fundamental Right
In the case of Kameshwar Prasad v. State of Bihar where Rule 4A of the Bihar Government Servantsā Conduct
Rules, 1956, which prohibits āany form of demonstrationsā for the redress of the grievances of Government
servants was contented to be violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to them under Art. 19(1) (a) and (b)
of the Constitution of India and should, therefore, be struck down by the petitioners. But the court observed that
āThe rule in so far as it prohibits a strike cannot be struck down since there is no fundamental right to resort to a
strike.ā
16. The prevalence of LPG in India along with flexibility measure adopted by employers and
decline in jobs in organised sector are creating challenges to the Unions,
simultaneously providing opportunities to restructure the Union movement.