VIP Call Girl Sector 32 Noida Just Book Me 9711199171
RNA Quality Control - Comparing Different RNA Quality Indicators
1. Sample to Insight
1
Dr. Pierre-Henri Ferdinand
Global Product Management
Pierre-henri.ferdinand@qiagen.com
Quality Control of RNA samples
RNA quality control – comparing different RNA quality indicators
2. Sample to Insight
Legal Disclaimer
2
QIAGEN products shown here are intended for molecular biology
applications. These products are not intended for the diagnosis,
prevention, or treatment of a disease.
For up-to-date licensing information and product-specific
disclaimers, see the respective QIAGEN kit handbook or user
manual. QIAGEN kit handbooks and user manuals are available
at www.QIAGEN.com or can be requested from QIAGEN
Technical Services or your local distributor.
Quality Control of RNA samples
3. Sample to Insight
Outline
Quality Control of RNA samples 3
Why is RNA quality control so important1
Main parameters for RNA QC2
Fast and reliable quality control3
Comparison of RIN and RIS4
Wrap up5
5. Sample to Insight
5
Non reproducibleReproducible
biomedical
research
50%
• Culture of “publish or perish”
• Inefficiencies in designing, conducting, and reporting of
studies
• Lack of standardization of sample quality for inter-lab
reproducibility
Some solutions for tackling the issue:
• Implementing quality control procedures at key steps of laboratory workflows to help
standardizing the parameters of the samples, and thus the quality of the data
generated.
• Combining lab automation with quality chemistries to enhance reproducibility of
experiments, bringing confidence in data interpretation.
Quality Control of RNA samples
6. Sample to Insight
6
QC emphasizes on gaining insight into a sample quality and assessing its
suitability for downstream applications and its potential for generating reliable
results.
QC plays an important role when it comes to developing routine procedures or
troubleshooting an experiment.
µg
?
Purity?
Quantity?
Integrity?
Size?
Are these parameters in the range of my
experiment’s requirements for
generating high-quality results?
RNA
Quality?
What is RNA sample QC?
Quality Control of RNA samples
7. Sample to Insight
7
Why is sample QC so important?
Risk of failure
Molecular biology workflows are complex, error- and failure-prone multi-step
procedures
A lot of things can potentially go wrong during workflows
RNA can be unstable: sensitive to heat, radiations and nucleases
Confidence in results
At the end, only the quality of the final result matters
The quality of the final results is highly influenced by quality of samples
Cost aspects
Downstream applications get more sensitive but not necessarily more
robust to variations in samples quality
Failure means waste of time and resources
Price per sample Time
qPCR 1.5 $US 4-5 hrs
Sanger Sequencing 5-6 $US 4-6 hrs
Next-Gen Sequencing >200 $US(5plex) 2-3 working days
Affymetrix GeneChip Analysis 500-800 $US/sample > 2 working days
Quality Control of RNA samples
8. Sample to Insight
8
Sample
collection/
stabilization
RNA
purification,
cDNA & cRNA
synthesis
Quantification,
Normalization,
Fragmentation
Array
Hybridization
and scanning
Data analysis
&
interpretation
Gene expression Microarrays
QC QC
Sample
collection/
stabilization
RNA
purification
Amplification Analysis
Data analysis
&
interpretation
Gene expression RT-PCR
QC
Sample
collection/
stabilization
DNA/RNA
purification
NGS Library
Prep
Sequencing
Data analysis
&
interpretation
RNA-Seq
QC QC
RNA Quality Control is recommended in Gene expression workflows
RNA samples Quality
Control and standardization
Quality Control of RNA samples
9. Sample to Insight
Outline
Quality Control of RNA samples 9
Why is RNA quality control so important1
Main parameters for RNA QC2
Fast and reliable quality control3
Comparison of RIN and RIS4
Wrap up5
10. Sample to Insight
Six parameters of prime relevance for sample Quality Control
Quality Control of RNA samples 10
QC Criteria UV spectro. Gels Dye-based
spectro.
CE / µ-
fluidic
UV/VIS
spectro.
Protein contaminants
(A260/280)
Salts & other
contaminants
(A260/230)
Quantity of dsDNA
vs. other NA
Yield
()
Degradation/
Size distribution ()
Sizing
There is no one-for-all solution – 2 technologies cover all sample QC needs
purity
quantity
integrity
11. Sample to Insight
Main RNA quality parameters
Quality Control of RNA samples 11
Purity
Quantity
Integrity
What is the yield of my extraction? How much RNA is in the tube and at what
concentration? Will I have enough material?
When the concentration of NA is overestimated, the input amount will be too low. This leads to weak
amplification and weak signal strength.
When the concentration of DNA is underestimated the input amount will be too high and can lead to
overuse of precious samples, increased concentration of inhibitors, false priming, unfavorable ratios, etc.
What’s really in my tube? Could contamination or impurities interfere with my
assay?
Phenol, ethanol, salts, etc. can jeopardize sensitivity and efficiency of downstream enzymatic reactions.
Large amounts of unwanted ssDNA or dsDNA template lead to overestimation of the molecule of interest
and interferes with downstream applications.
Does my RNA sample have the correct size distribution? Has RNA been
degraded?
RNA samples of poor integrity can affect PCR or sequencing reactions and lead to errors in replication
and/or lower yields e.g. irrelevant CT values. Degraded samples can produce false negative results.
12. Sample to Insight
Quality Control of RNA samples 12
• RNA QC requirements vary depending on downstream applications:
RT-PCR, qRT-PCR, Microarray or RNA-Seq
• Small deviations in key sample parameters can have potential
impact on final results
Implementation of QC procedures with relevant pass-criteria and ensuring RNA
samples quality parameters are within acceptable range are essential to maximize
success of experiments, thus saving time, money and peace of mind
Highest quality results are only achieved from quality samples
Only quality results are worth sharing
13. Sample to Insight
Key quality indicators
Quality Control of RNA samples 13
QC Criteria UV spectro. Gels Dye-based
spectro.
CE / µ-
fluidic
UV/VIS
spectro.
Protein contaminants
(A260/280)
Salts & other
contaminants
(A260/230)
Quantity of dsDNA
vs. other NA
Yield
()
Degradation/
Size distribution ()
Sizing
There is no one-for-all solution
purity
quantity
integrity
14. Sample to Insight
Key quality indicators
Quality Control of RNA samples 14
QC Criteria UV spectro. Gels Dye-based
spectro.
QIAxcel
Advanced
QIAxpert
Protein contaminants
(A260/280)
Salts & other
contaminants
(A260/230)
Quantity of dsDNA
vs. other NA
Yield
()
Degradation/
Size distribution ()
Sizing
purity
quantity
integrity
There is no one-for-all solution – QIAGEN covers all your needs for sample Quality Control!
15. Sample to Insight
Outline
Quality Control of RNA samples 15
Why is RNA quality control so important1
Main parameters for RNA QC2
Fast and reliable quality control3
Comparison of RIN and RIS4
Wrap up5
16. Sample to Insight
Quality Control of RNA samples 16
Sample
collection/
stabilization
RNA
purification
Amplification/
NGS Library
Prep
Analysis
Data analysis
&
interpretation
QCQC
Quantity &
Purity
Integrity & size
distribution
QIAxpert QIAxcel Advanced
17. Sample to Insight
QIAxpert uses innovative microfluidic sample carrier
17
Key features:
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Sample loading well
Capillaries
Microcuvette
Overflow
Vent hole for vacuum
Only 2 µl of sample required
DNA range: 1.5 ng/μl up to 2000
ng/μl dsDNA (A260)
Fast analysis, up to 16 samples in
less than 2 minutes
Algorithm can unmixe sample’s
spectra to differentiate contribution
of different molecules.
QIAxpert is a high-speed spectrophotometer for DNA, RNA and
protein analysis. It is fast, accurate and sensitive.
Quality Control of RNA samples
18. Sample to Insight
Quality Control of RNA samples 18
Classic spectrophotometry
A230: impurities
A280: proteins
A260: nucleic acids
19. Sample to Insight
Quality Control of RNA samples 19
1. Absorbance measurement (and
background correction)
2. Content profiling of the measured
spectrum by fitting of reference
spectra into
• Specific DNA or RNA spectrum
• Impurities spectrum
• Residue spectrum
3. Quality control
• Impurities spectrum
• Residue spectrum
• Backround spectrum
• A260/A280 ratio for protein
contamination
QIAxpert – Unique spectral content profiling protocols
Quantity of DNA or RNA
you think you have
Quantity of DNA or RNA
you actually have
20. Sample to Insight
With QIAxpert – tell RNA from DNA and other contaminants without a dye
20
High-speed microfluidics
• No drop & clean action required, no cross contamination
• Evaporation-safe for 2h
• Flexible input & up to 16 samples in <2 min
Comprehensive Export
• Reports can be viewed on any browser
• USB and Network data output
• No extra software or computer required
Easy interaction
• Inbuilt touchscreen
• Simple GUI
• Variety of pre-installed protocols
Spectral content profiling
• Differentiation between molecules
• Quantify and subtract identified impurities
• Give best insight into samples’ quality
Quality Control of RNA samples
21. Sample to Insight
Quantity & Purity !
QIAxpert – Unique spectral content profiling protocols
21
Classic spectrophotometry
Quantity
Spectral Content Profiling
For internal use only
• DNA or RNA spectrum
• Impurities spectrum
• Residue spectrum
Quality Control of RNA samples
22. Sample to Insight
Quality Control of RNA samples 22
Sample
collection/
stabilization
RNA
purification
Amplification/
NGS Library
Prep
Analysis
Data analysis
&
interpretation
QCQC
Quantity &
Purity
Integrity & size
distribution
QIAxpert QIAxcel Advanced
23. Sample to Insight
QIAxcel Advanced allows separation, detection and analysis of NA
23
QIAxcel Advanced
Fully automated DNA and RNA analysis
Fast processing: 12 samples in 8 – 13 min
Up to 96 samples per run
Up to twenty 96-well plates with QIAxcel HT
High resolution down to 3 – 5 bp up to 500 bp
Safety and convenience with ready-to-use gel cartridges
Digital data output
QIAxcel Advanced is an automated capillary electrophoresis system for
DNA and RNA analysis.
QIAxcel Advanced allows analysis of gDNA, RNA and
NGS libraries
Quality Control of RNA samples
24. Sample to Insight
QIAxcel Advanced capillary electrophoresis principle
24Quality Control of RNA samples
• Reusable 12-capillary cartridges
• Fast processing: 12 samples in 8-13 min
• Detection limit of 0.1 ng/µl
• Sample consumption < 0.1µl
25. Sample to Insight
How does it work?
Place the gel cartridge into the instrument
Load samples (tube strips or 96-well plates), buffers,
and markers
Select the Process Profile of your choice... and GO!
Look at the results in real-time on the screen and
report data just a few minutes later
Operating the QIAxcel Advanced system:
Quality Control of RNA samples 25
26. Sample to Insight
Total RNA quality is assessed by analysing the migration pattern
26
28S
18S
5S
18S/28S ratio
Smears
Objectivity of the visual ratio estimation?
Ratio is not always correlated to integrity!
Quality Control of RNA samples
27. Sample to Insight
RNA Quality Control - RNA Integrity Score (RIS)
27
A1 RIS: 9.5 A7 RIS: 5.8
A11 RIS: 3.6 Superimposed view
Lane Name RIS
A1 rat_liver _1 9.5
A7 rat_liver _4 5.8
A11 rat_liver _6 3.6
Quality Control of RNA samples
RIS
10 1
RNA Integrity
28. Sample to Insight
28
The gel images of QIAxcel and Agilent 2100 are comparable
QIAxcelBioanalyzer
Quality Control of RNA samples
29. Sample to Insight
RIS and RIN can objectively assess RNA integrity
29
RIS : RNA Integrity Score, by QIAGEN
RIN : RNA Integrity Number, by Agilent
• Indicators reflecting RNA integrity
• Intended to predict the validity of
downstream qPCR
Frame of reference of RIS and RIN:
• Values range from 1 (highly degraded) to 10 (mostly intact)
• Analyse several different electropherogram’s parameters, including 28S and
18S peaks analysis
• Values between 7 and 10 (depending of what is achievable with samples) are
indicators of RNA quality suitable for downstream applications
• Allow comparison of sample, standardization and repeatability of experiments
Quality Control of RNA samples
30. Sample to Insight
Outline
Quality Control of RNA samples 30
Why is RNA quality control so important1
Main parameters for RNA QC2
Fast and reliable quality control3
Comparison of RIN and RIS4
Wrap up5
31. Sample to Insight
RIS is more robust than RIN for assessing RNA integrity
31
• Depending on the degradation mechanism (heat, nuclease or UV), total RNA samples have different
electrophoretic behavior
• Different RNA degradation methods result in different ranges of ΔΔCt values for identical RIS/RIN values
• “Overall, RIS was more robust than RIN for assessing RNA integrity” Unger, C et al., 2015
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25998866
www.researchgate.net/publication/277080839_Ultraviolet_C_radiation_influences_the_robustness_of_RNA_integrity_measurement
Quality Control of RNA samples
32. Sample to Insight
Methods
32
RNA extraction
RNA degradation
x3 independent experiments
RNA integrity
assessment
measured in duplicate
SYBR Green qRT-PCR
RT2 RNA QC PCR Array, selective degraded
RNA samples applied in triplicate
Goal of the study: compare RIS and RIN to the mRNA integrity observed by
qRT-PCR in order to evaluate their respective ability to assess RNA integrity
Jurkat &
HeLa S3
cells
RNase III
0-7 min,
37°C
Heat
0-120 min,
70°C
UV light
0-220 min,
254 nm
Agilent 2100
Bioanalyzer
RIN
QIAxcel
Advanced
RIS
Jurkat
ΔΔCt of
actb and
hprt1
Quality Control of RNA samples
33. Sample to Insight
33
Figure : Decreasing RIS and RIN values were obtained by increasing time of heat degradation of total RNA. RIS
and RIN were determined of duplicates from partially degraded RNA. In three independent experiments. The mean of RIS
and RIN obtained for each cell type is presented over time of heat degradation (A). The correlation of RIS and RIN
calculated with a regression analysis using Minitab 16 presented for degraded RNA from Jurkat (B) and HeLa S3 cells (C).
RIN and RIS have a high correlation for heat-degraded RNA
Quality Control of RNA samples
34. Sample to Insight
34
Figure : Increasing degradation level of total RNA by RNase digestion resulted in decreasing RIS and RIN.
RIS and RIN were determined for duplicates of degraded RNA samples from three independent experiments; the
mean was plotted as function of time of incubation with RNase (A). A linear regression analysis was performed with
Minitab 16 to determine correlation of RIS and RIN for degraded RNA from Jurkat (B) and HeLa S3 cells (C).
RIN and RIS have a high correlation for RNase-digested RNA
Quality Control of RNA samples
35. Sample to Insight
35
RIS and RIN values are dissimilar after 100 minutes of UV exposure
Figure: RNA exposure to UV-irradiation resulted in decreasing RIS and RIN over time with high variances in lower RIN
values. RIS and RIN were determined of duplicates for each sample from three independent experiments. The mean values were
plotted as function of exposure time (A), the correlation between RIS and RIN was analyzed by a linear regression analysis
with Minitab 16 for Jurkat (B) and HeLa S3 cells (C). Presented are also screen shots of the 2100 Expert software showing the
electropherogram from duplicates of Jurkat RNA degraded for 185 min, resulting in RIN 2.6 (D) and 4.7 (E).
Quality Control of RNA samples
36. Sample to Insight
RIN algorithm struggles defining 28S peaks of highly UV-damaged RNA
36
Electropherograms of these duplicates look similar but 28S peaks are defined differently
(Jurkat RNA degraded for 185 min) resulting in RIN 2.6 (D) and 4.7 (E).
Quality Control of RNA samples
37. Sample to Insight
37
RIS>RIN RIS>RIN RIS>RIN
RNase
digestion
Heat
degradation
UV-light
exposure
Correlation
ΔΔCt and RIS
values
R²= 89,7% R²= 89,6% R²= 97,4%
Correlation
ΔΔCt and RIN
values
R²= 89,6% R²= 87,6% R²= 93,1%
Figure: the correlation of ΔΔCt-values with RIS and RIN values
Calculated by a linear regression analysis with Minitab 16, to study whether RIS and RIN could predict
the outcome of a qPCR. Fitted line plots with regression line and adjusted R2 values of RIS and RIN
against ΔΔCt-values of ACTB
Quality Control of RNA samples
38. Sample to Insight
Heat
38
RNase UV light
1) RNase, heat and UV light have different degradation mechanisms on RNA
2) Different RNA degradation methods result in different ranges of ΔΔCt values at similar RNA
integrity values (1-log difference)
3) RIS is more robust than RIN to determine RNA integrity of RNA degraded by different methods
and to evaluate suitability of RNA sample for qRT-PCR
High correlation between RIS and RIN values for heat- and RNase III-degraded RNA
Lower correlation between RIN and RIS values for UV-degraded RNA, due to high variation in
RIN values, but similar at a decision level of RIN/RIS 7
Quality Control of RNA samples
39. Sample to Insight
Outline
Quality Control of RNA samples 39
Why is RNA quality control so important1
Main parameters for RNA QC2
Fast and reliable quality control3
Comparison of RIN and RIS4
Wrap up5
40. Sample to Insight
Sample Insight
Sample
collection/
stabilization
DNA/RNA
purification
Amplification/
NGS Library
Prep
Analysis
Data analysis
&
interpretation
Sample QC must be part of molecular biology workflows, not optional steps on top.
QC brings value to workflow and can save cost, time and peace of mind
QC QC
Quality Control of RNA samples
41. Sample to Insight
Key quality indicators
Quality Control of RNA samples 41
QC Criteria UV spectro. Gels Dye-based
spectro
CE / µ-
fluidic
UV/VIS
spectro.
Protein contaminants
(A260/280)
Salts & other
contaminants
(A260/230)
Quantity of dsDNA
vs. other NA
Yield
()
Degradation/
Size distribution ()
Sizing
There is no one-for-all solution
purity
quantity
integrity
42. Sample to Insight
Key quality indicators
Quality Control of RNA samples 42
QC Criteria UV spectro. Gels Dye-based
spectro.
QIAxcel
Advanced
QIAxpert
Protein contaminants
(A260/280)
Salts & other
contaminants
(A260/230)
Quantity of dsDNA
vs. other NA
Yield
()
Degradation/
Size distribution ()
Sizing
purity
quantity
integrity
There is no one-for-all solution – QIAGEN covers all your needs for sample Quality Control!
43. Sample to Insight
Size distribution analysis
Quantity & Purity
QIAGEN covers all your needs for sample Quality Control
43
Spectral Content Profiling
For internal use only
Integrity
QIAxpert QIAxcel Advanced
Quality Control of RNA samples
44. Sample to Insight
Sample QC can save you time, money, and peace of mind
Quality Control of RNA samples 44
Application Price per sample Time
Downstream
application
qPCR 1.5 $US 4-5 hrs
Sanger Sequencing 5-6 $US 4-6 hrs
Next-Gen Sequencing >200 $US(5plex) 2-3 working days
Affymetrix GeneChip
Analysis
500-800 $US/sample > 2 working days
Sample Quality
Control
QIAxpert <1$US
90 seconds
(16 samples in parallel)
QIAxcel Advanced <1$US
3-10 minutes
(12 samples in parallel)
Purity &
quantity
Integrity
QC gives insights into
sample suitability for
downstream application
• Brings confidence in data analysis and interpretation, troubleshooting
• Saves time, money, and peace of mind by excluding samples of poor quality
“Save time, money, and peace of mind only dealing with the
samples you deserve: the ones of highest quality”
45. Sample to Insight
How does QIAGEN helps you achieving reliable QC?
Quality Control of RNA samples 45
Quantity &
Purity
Integrity & size
distribution
QIAxpert QIAxcel Advanced
Let lab automation work for you and do the job they are excellent at:
Delivering reliable and reproducible results
Perform accurate measurements, keep track of your sample quality, standardize
your experiments and increase reproducibility of your results.
Increase your lab productivity: automation frees your hands and your mind!
46. Sample to Insight
Quality Control of RNA samples 46
Quantity &
Purity
Integrity & size
distribution
QIAxpert QIAxcel Advanced
More info on:
QIAGEN.com
Discover how these instruments can help you improve the
reproducibility of your experiments and achieve higher
quality results with our interactive online demo tools and
request a free demo in your lab!
47. Sample to Insight
47
Questions?
Thank you for your attention!
Pierre-Henri Ferdinand
Global Product Management
Pierre-henri.ferdinand@qiagen.com
Learn more about nucleic acids QC on:
qiagen.com/QCSolutions
Quality Control of RNA samples
49. Sample to Insight
Additional Methods & Materials
Title, Location, Date 49
Determination of RNA integrity
QIAxcel Advanced
QIAxcel RNA QC Kit v2.0
Method: CL-RNA
Software: QIAxcel ScreenGel
Output: RNA Integrity Score (RIS)
Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer
Agilent RNA 6000 Nano Kit
Method: Eukaryote Total RNA Nano
Software: 2100 Expert
Output: RNA Integrity Number (RIN)
RNA extraction
Material: Jurkat and HeLa S3 cells
Homogenization: TissueRuptor
RNA extraction: RNeasy Mini kit, including DNase I digestion, on the
QIAcube
Determination of RNA concentration: Nanodrop 1000
50. Sample to Insight
Title, Location, Date 50
RNA degradation
Three independent experiments for each degradation method, comparing RNA of Jurkat and
HeLa S3 cells.
1. RNA digestion with ShortCut® RNase III (NEB)
90 µl reaction volume with:
9 µg RNA
0.1x Reaction buffer
0.2 units RNase III
0.1x MnCl2
Incubation at 37 °C for 0.5 / 1.5 / 3 / 5 and 7 min, stop reaction with 5 mM EDTA
Remove enzyme with RNeasy MinElute Cleanup kit
2. RNA degradation by heat (established by QIAGEN)
50 µl of 300 ng/µl RNA in RNase-free water
Incubation in a heat block at 75 °C for 0 / 20 / 40 / 60 / 80 / 100 and 120 min
3. RNA degradation by UV-irradiation (established by IBBL)
50 µl of 320 ng/µl RNA in RNase-free water
Exposure to UV-irradiation (254 nm)
10 time spans between 0 and 220 min
51. Sample to Insight
Correlation between RIN & RIS and ΔΔCt values were comparable
Title, Location, Date 51
RIN RIS
ΔΔCtofactbΔΔCtofhprt1
Figure: For RNA degraded by RNase, the correlations between ΔΔCt-values and RIS or RIN were comparable, ΔΔCt values
were between 0 and 2.5. Selected samples of RNA from Jurkat cells degraded by ShortCut® RNase III were analyzed by qPCR. A
linear regression analysis was performed using Minitab 16 to study the correlation between RIN (left) or RIS (right) and ΔΔCt-values of
the housekeeping genes actb (top) or hprt1 (bottom).
52. Sample to Insight
ΔΔCt values showed slightly higher correlation with RIS than RIN
Title, Location, Date 52
RIN RIS
ΔΔCtofactbΔΔCtofhprt1
Figure: For heat degraded RNA, the correlation between ΔΔCt-values and RIS was slightly higher compared to RIN, ΔΔCt
values were between 0 and 1.6. Selected samples of heat degraded RNA from Jurkat cells were analyzed by qPCR and a linear
regression analysis was performed using Minitab 16 to study the correlation between ΔΔCt-values of the housekeeping genes actb (top)
or hprt1 (bottom) and RIN (left) or RIS (right).
53. Sample to Insight
ΔΔCt values showed higher correlation with RIS than with RIN
Title, Location, Date 53
RIN RIS
ΔΔCtofactbΔΔCtofhprt1
Figure: ΔΔCt values showed higher correlation with RIS than with RIN, ΔΔCt values were between 0 and 16. qRT-PCRs were
run with selected samples of UV degraded RNA from Jurkat cells and a linear regression analysis was performed using Minitab 16 to
study the correlation between ΔΔCt-values of ACTB (top) or HPRT1 (bottom) and RIN (left) or RIS (right).
54. Sample to Insight
Total RNA and cRNA analysis
QIAxcel Advanced – Pure Excellence
Typical workflow within
microarray analysis
Quality control of unlabelled cRNA generated
From yeast total RNA
A gel view, B electropherogram view
Quality control of total RNA purified from
yeast
A gel view, B electropherogram view
Data kindly provided by D. van Leenen, Microarray Facility UMC Utrecht, NL
55. Sample to Insight
QIAxpert – excellent measurement accuracy
55
QIAxpert: lowest %CV value
Qubit: high mean variation
250 ng/µl reference RNA
(Agilent Technologies)
Accuracy
qPCR Human Reference Total RNA (Agilent Technologies)
was diluted to 250 ng/µL (dilution from original solution in
H2O). A total of 40 replicates were measured, each on the
QIAxpert (RNA260 app), on a Nanodrop 8000, and the
Qubit system.
56. Sample to Insight
QIAxpert – excellent linearity in RNA quantification
56
QIAxpert Nanodrop Qubit
Excellent linearity Systematic
overquantification
Systematic
underquantification
Comparison of RNA linearity using different systems
Linearity
Human Reference RNA (Agilent) was diluted to 1000 ng/µl, 500 ng/µl, 100 ng/µl, 50 ng/µl, 10 ng/µl, 5 ng/µl, and 1.5 ng/µl. A total of 5 replicates of each dilution were
measured using the QIAxpert system, a Nanodrop 8000, and the Qubit. Data shown for the QIAxpert reflects total NA measured with the RNeasy app.