1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
25 YEAR OLD FEMALE WITH PROGRESSIVE
SWELLING IN TONGUE AND FLOOR OF MOUTH
PRESENTER
Dr. Prashansa Gaikwad
OMFS RESIDENT
UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF
2. Dr. Prashansa Gaikwad
PG Resident, Department of Oral and maxillofacial surgery,
Mahatma Gandhi Dental College and Hospital, Jaipur.
3. An unusual case of Swelling in
the tongue and floor of mouth.
4. • Chief complaint :
➔ Pain in tongue, mainly in anterior part.
➔ Swelling in anterior part of tongue and floor of
mouth.
➔ Bluish discolouration in anterior part of tongue and
floor of mouth since 9 months.
5. • History of present illness :
• Patient was well 9 months back
• Pain was dull, throbbing, increased on eating food.
• Swelling developed gradually over 9 months slowly associated
with mild tenderness.
• Peanut size swelling in anterior region of tongue that gradually
developed to present size.
• There was no history of trauma.
• No h/o Trauma.
• No h/o difficulty in deglutition or mastication.
• No recent changes in dietary and food habits.
• No h/o of fever or malaise.
• No h/o weight loss.
• No h/o insect bite.
• No h/o evident skin lesions.
6. ● History of past illness
• No significant past medical history.
• There was no change in recent dietary habits.
• Dental history :
• Brushed teeth once daily.
• Using horizontal brushing technique.
• Suggest Modified Bass technique.
• No broken tooth or sharp cusp.
• No h/o any dental procedure empirically.
7. • No history of similar illness in family.
• No history of any known hereditary condition in family.
• No history of any syndromic condition family.
• No history any chronic or systemic disease in family.
• No history of consanguineous marriage.
• Patient is of sober habits.
• Vegetarian by diet.
● Family history:
● Personal history:
8. • Menstrual history :
• Obstetric history :
• Menarche at 14 years of age.
• Regular menstrual cycle of 28 days.
• Changes 1 pad/day during flow period.(5-6 days)
• Had no other abnormal associated symptoms.
• Currently patient is amenorrhic and breastfeeding a 11
month old girl.
• Patient had one pregnancy and birthed a female child.
• Patient had a full term vaginal delivery.
• G1P1A0
● Patient was a lactating mother of a 11 month old female
child.
9. • Duration : 9 months
• Mode of onset : Gradual
• Exact site : Anterior tongue involving dorsal + ventral surfaces
involving right floor of the mouth.
• Progression : Slow.
• Associated symptoms : mild tenderness.
• Secondary Changes : None.
• Family history of swelling : No history of TB or Neoplasm or
Syndromes.
• History associated with swelling
10. Summary
• 25 years old female.
• Bluish discoloration and swelling of anterior tongue & floor of
mouth.
• Not associated with difficulty in speech or mastication.
• No h/o systemic disease or allergies.
• No h/o any hereditary or syndromic condition.
12. Syndromic Association
Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome
Down's syndrome
Hurler-Pfaundler syndrome
Blue rubber bleb nevus syndrome
Maffucci syndrome
Nutritional Causes
Pellagra
Pernicious Anemia
Vascular Causes
Hemangioma
Hematoma
Venous stasis
AV Malformation
Hormonal Causes
Tumor of the pituitary gland
Acromegaly
Local Causes
Trauma
Ranula
Irritational fibroma
Other
Acanthosis nigricans
Angioedema
Lymphangioma
Tongue cancer
Differential diagnosis
LOCAL SYSTEMIC
13. • General examination :
• Build : Well build.
• Nourishment : Well nourished.
• Pulse Rate : 86 bpm
• Blood Pressure : 128/80 mmHg (Right arm Supine position.)
• Temperature :
• Weight : 52 kg.
• Height : 5”2
• With no other abnormality present in general examination.
15. • Extra oral examination :
• Facial symmetry : No asymmetry
• Lips : Competent
• Vermillion Border : No abnormality
• Mouth opening : 3 fingers.
● No significant
Lymphadenopathy seen.
1. Extraoral
• No evident
abnormality in respect to eyes,
ear, nose.
● Local Examination
16. • Intraoral Hard tissue examination :
• All teeth normal as per age.
• Intact occlusion with no positive hard tissue findings.
• No sharp cusp of teeth in relation to the lesion.
17. • Intraoral soft tissue examination :
I. Inspection :
• Labial Mucosa : No abnormality
• Labial vestibule : No abnormality
• Buccal Mucosa : No abnormality
• Buccal vestibule : No abnormality
• Gingiva & Periodontium : No abnormality
• Palate : No abnormality
18. • Tongue : Finding present.
• Floor of mouth : Finding
present.
• Size : 5cm x 5cm approx.
• Shape: Oval.
• Color: Purple {Bluish red}
• Margin : Clearly defined.
• Number : Single.
• Pulsations : No visible
pulsations.
Tip, ventral surface
of tongue, right
lateral border,
diffuse swelling in
anterior aspect.
Mid dorsal , right
floor of mouth
20. • Intraoral soft tissue examination :
III. In Investigation :
• Blind aspiration was done
under all aseptic conditions.
• Frank blood was aspirated.
• Usually when patient with
such swelling comes we
routinely do a diagnostic
aspiration
NEEDLE
PLACED AT
ANTERIOR
PART OF
DORSUM OF
TOUNGE
21. Summary
• 25 years old female.
• Bluish discoloration and swelling of anterior tongue, involving
dorsal and ventral surfaces and extending up to right floor of
mouth and crosses the midline anteriorly.
• No h/o systemic disease or allergies.
• Not associated with difficulty in speech or mastication.
• No gross abnormality noted on general examination.
• Frank blood aspirated from the lesion.
• No symptoms of hereditary or syndromic condition.
25. IV. Auscultation :
• It was done by handheld Doppler.
• In respect to anterior mandibular region.
• It showed increased Vascular flow in the lesion
29. Parameters Result value Normal Value
Blood sugar R 117.0 mg/dl 80-140 mg/dl
Blood Glucose
Serum Electrolytes
Parameters Result value Normal Value
Serum sodium 139.7 mmol/L 137.0 – 145.0 mmol/L
Serum potassium 4.35 mmol/L 3.5 – 5.1 mmol/L
Serum chloride 98.9 mmol/L 98.0- 107.0 mmol/L
Liver function test
Parameters Result value Normal Value
S. Bilirubin total 0.8 mg/dl 0.2-1.3 mg/dl
S. Bilirubin direct 0.4 mg/dl <0.3 mg/dl
S. Bilirubin indirect 0.4 mg/dl 0.1-0.9 mg/ dl
SGOT/ AST 33.2 U/L 15.0-46.0 U/L
SGPT/ ALT 28.9 U/L 13.0 – 69.0 U/L
S. Alkaline phosphatase 136.0 U/L 38- 126 U/L
30. Renal function test
Parameters Result value Normal Value
Blood urea 17.0 mg/dl 15.0-45.0 mg/dl
S. Creatinine 0.5 mg/dl 0.52-1.25 mg/dl
S. Uric acid 3.4 mg/dl 2.5-6.2 mg/dl
Prothrombin time
Parameters Result value Normal Value
Prothrombin time 12.0 seconds Control – 12.0 seconds
INR 1.0 seconds
Viral Markers
Test Results
Covid – 19 {RT-PCR} Negative
Hepatitis B surface antigen Negative
Hepatitis C antibodies Non- reactive
HIV 1&2 antibodies Non- reactive
31.
32.
33.
34.
35. • Final diagnosis :
Low flow Vascular Malformation of
anterior Tongue and right floor of the
mouth.
36. Dr. Ruchika Tiwari
Professor, Department of Oral and maxillofacial surgery,
Mahatma Gandhi Dental College and Hospital, Jaipur.
40. • Dr.Sanjeev S Nair introduced a more practical classification
to helped in surgical planning ,the surgical approach and
reconstruction necessary for the type of vascular lesion.
41. • In type I superficial lesions requiring excision of skin or mucosa,
local or regional flaps have been used in defect reconstruction.
• Type II submucosal lesions require complete excision after elevation
of skin flaps.
• Type III lymphovenous malformations or venous malformations
involving glands of the head and neck are excised along with the
affected gland.
• Type IV intraosseous lesions require excision with involved bone
and reconstruction when required.
• Type V lesions involving deep visceral spaces, such as the
parapharyngeal or infratemporal fossa, require skeletal access
osteotomy for complete exposure and total excision.
43. • Overall, infantile hemangiomas have an incidence of 3–10% in
the literature, but more evidenced study confirmed that it is
likely 4–5%
• A multicentric prospective study with an aim to identify
demographics of infantile hemangiomas concluded female
gender, prematurity, multiple gestations, Caucasian ethnicity,
low birth weight and advanced maternal age are the associated
risk factors .
• Among vascular lesions, venous malformations are the
common along with lymphatic ones having incidence of
1:5000–10,000, and surprisingly 40% of them usually occur in
head and neck regions
47. • Clinical diagnosis of hemangiomas generally
arises from:
1. Making a thorough physical examination
which considers the shape, consistency and
possible invasive lesion, with subsequent
deterioration of vital functions.
1. Rule out other associated syndromes.
48. Diagnosis
• Clinical diagnosis of superficial Venous malformations
is easy by clinical examination.
• For deep seated lesion in the head and neck,we require
further investigations.
• Imaging studies using ultrasound (US), CT, MRI
,angiography are the best diagnostic scans
50. Diagnostic imaging techniques like color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS), MRI,
CECT scan, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) (catheterizing the entire
vertebral or vascular tree) and MR venography for low-flow lesions has been
aiding the surgeon to manage these lesions.
53. • In distinction to hemangiomas, vascular malformations result
from abnormal vascular or lymphatic morphogenesis, not due
to abnormal endothelial proliferation.
56. Management of VM
• Preliminary imaging will differentiate a high flow from a
low-flow lesion.
• In low-flow lesions with large vascular channels and spaces
in the head and neck region, total excision is a surgical
challenge and misadventure.
•
• The philosophy of management then hinges on
decompressing the lesion or partial elimination.
• This can be achieved with administration of intralesional
medicaments which may be sclerosing in nature
57.
58. Intra lesional sclerosants
• Sclerotherapy has become the current mainstream
treatment for venous malformation. It can be used
alone or combined with surgery and/or laser therapy.
• Mechanism of action of these sclerosing agents:
• Destroying the blood vessel’s endothelial cells,
acceleration of protein coagulation in blood of
lesions, formation of thrombosis, platelets adhesion
promotion and causing vascular occlusion through
thrombotic mechanisms.
59. A case of vascular malformation of tongue &
floor of mouth
63. Intra-lesional bleomycin injection
• Informed consent was taken from all patients
• Bleomycin: 15 IU diluted in 5ml normal saline mixed with
lidocaine
• Patient underwent puncture of the lesion and complete
aspiration of the intralesional fluid. The bleomycin was
multiply injected in a radial fashion. Patients remained under
observation for approximately 1 hour after the procedure.
• 3 injections given at an interval of 15 days.
71. • Bleomycin is a cytotoxic anti-tumour antibiotic, discovered by
Umezawa in 1966.
• Recently been shown as an effective treatment for vascular
malformations via intralesional injections.
• It has Low toxicity.
• Bleomycin exhibits a dual effect on human tissue in that it can
induce DNA degradation in undercoiled strand regions during S
stage of cell cycle, and in addition has a specific Sclerosing effect
on vascular endothelium
• Minimal immunosuppression and myelosuppression.
• In adults, the maximum dose per treatment session was 10 to 15
mg or 15000 units.
Bleomycin
76. Conclusion
• The efficacy and safety of intralesional bleomycin
injection proved to be satisfactory.
• Therapeutic outcomes were good.
• There were no major complications.
• Low-flow VMs show excellent response to intralesional
bleomycin sclerotherapy.
• Decompressing / partially eliminating the lesion
combined with surgical treatment, is the most
conventional modern approach.
77. Case 2 : AV of anterior mandible
Pre- Operative
pictures
CT
Angiography
neck
81. Dr. Sonia Agarwal
Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology,
Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur.
Editor's Notes
Respected Chairperson, distinguished faculty members and my dear colleagues, Goodafternnon to and all.
I Dr. Prashansa, stand before you all on the behalf of department of oral and Maxillofacial surgery to present todays DCCR.
We bring to you…
A 25 year old, hindu married female, homemaker by occupation and a resident of district dausa, reported to our OPD with a chief complaint of pain, swelling and bluish discoloration in front part of tongue and floor of mouth since 9 months.
On asking the HOPI
On taking a note
The dental history of the patient showed
After inquiring family history of the patient we found no history of…
As we wanted to know about personal history, the patient claimed to have
On recording menstrual history, the patient had menarche
The obstetric history of patient hold one pregnancy and..
On bringing together all the negative history, there was…
By cumiliating all the history associated with swelling we found….
To summerize the case till now, I put forward to you…
I would now requesst the hoouse
I am thankful for your responses
On analysing the history given by the patient, we broadly grouped DD into 6 categories
Brielfy enumerating each of them
BWS: Growth disorder characterised by macrosomia, macroglossia and abdominal defects.
DS: Trisomy of 21 Cromosome, it has distinct physical features of short neck,flat fac, short appendegea & large tongue.
HPS: It is a severe form of Mucopolysaccharidosis, with hypertelorism,shrunken nose,large incompitant lips and protruding tongue as its clinical features.
BRBNS: It’s a congenital vasular anamoly, in which PT presnets with vascular malformation of skina and mucosal tissues.
MS: is a rare disorder characterized by encondroms along with mucosal and cutanous vascular malformations.
Trauma: Fractures of anterior mandible, causes sublingual hematoma: Colman’s sigh.
Ranula: It’s a mucocele involving sublingual gland, its generally painless but becomes painful during mastication, aspiration often yeilds turbid cystiv fluid.
Irritational fibroma: It may arise as a result of sharp cups of adjust teeth or due to ill fitting prosthesis.
Tumors: Somatotrophs adenomas: Groth hormone: Acromegay: Large facial features along with tongue.
Pellagra: systemic disease of VitB3, Niacin : red swollen tongue.
Pernicious anaemia : Autoimmune disoreder: Diminish absorption of B12Cobalamin, red swollen tongue.
Hemangioma: Begnin vascular lesion manifasted at infancy
Hematoma: Localised collection of blood ssecondary to trauma.
VS: deminished blood flow in veins.
AV: Abnormal tangling of blood vessels causing multiple irregular connections between arteries and veins
On beginning with general examination, PT was average built, well nourished with a weigth of 52kgs and a height of 5”2.
There was no abnormality associated with body proportions and decubitus.
There was no presence of clubbing, cynosis, icterus, pallor, lymphadenopathy or edema.
When skin and appendeges were examined, there were no lesions found.
A BP of 128/80 was recorded…..
Extraoral examination of the patient reveld no facial asymmentry and the face was bilaterally symmentrical and proportinate.
Moving to intraoral examintaion, we first checked for the hard tissue and found :
That PT had a permanat dentitation of 32 teeth with occlusion intact and tere was no presence of any step deformity.
All the teeth were examined and reveled no positive findings, We thoroly checked the teeth in realtion to the swelling and no sharp edges or abnormality was found.
Getting forward with intraoral soft tissue examination, we began with inspection and……. Were apparently alright with no evident abnormality.
But when we took our examination to tongue and floor of mouth…..
…Clinical findings were present.
As the picture demonstrates, there was swelling……
After palpation of swelling, we came across the listed findings….
As conventional percussion was not possible for the lesion, we planned to perform its aspiration.
Under all aseptic condition we performed a blind aspiration of the lesion and frank blood was aspirated.
I would resummerise the case, By adding three important findings from our examination……..
With a much detailed information about the case…..
I would again request the house to put forward some differntial diagnoisis…
Grateful for your responses…
And with it lets move forward to check our previous noted DD….
As we already discussed in brief about the primary manifestaion os S+N+H+O causes, no such evident findings were found on examination in association with our area of concern, hence we can rule them out….
Talking about local causes, there was no history of trauma, or pain during mastication or presence of any dental or prosthetic abnormality associated with lesion, which again helps us to rule them out…
Where as we had all positive findings which favoured our DD to be of vasulacular causes
And so, we narrowed our DD to……
To check for the vascular association of lesion and to make a much precise diagnosis, we did ….
Auscultation with hand held doppler in anterior mandibular region, which showed an increased vasular floor.
By judiciously studing all the examinatory findings…..
For the thorough study of the case, we requested…..
….. Routine blood investigation and CT angiography of head and neck.
All investigation were within normal range.
Viral markers were negative
The CT angiography reveled an ill defined hypodense area in anterior
…..Aspect of the tongue, along the right lateral border, involving base of tongue in midline and floor of the mouth on right anterior region
Patchy enhancement of these areas were seen in the arterial phase with gradual increasing contrast enhancement in subsequent venous pphase…..
…. Which were suggestive of slow flow vascular malformation…
And this helped us to reach a final diagnosis of…