SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 4
Download to read offline
21 ■ Government Engineering ■ May-June 2013
or the past 20 years, U.S. water
infrastructure has faced many
challenges, including growing
populations and a decreasing water sup-
ply, aging assets, and declining budgets.
Water providers, such as cities, water
districts, and utilities, are being asked to
manage programs and assets more effi-
ciently while maintaining high levels of
service. Some water providers have
identified deficiencies and developed
plans to mitigate and resolve their
issues; however, many have failed to
execute these plans. Colorado Springs
Utilities’ Southern Delivery System
(SDS) is an example of diligent water
resource planning and execution to pro-
vide water for current and future gener-
ations. SDS is a southern Colorado
project that will bring water from the
Arkansas River to residents and busi-
nesses in the City of Colorado Springs,
the City of Fountain, Security Water
District, and Pueblo West Metropolitan
District.
Colorado Springs is located remotely
from any major bodies of water. Since
its incorporation, the city has created a
Securing Water for
the Future
Delivery and asset integration of the
Southern Delivery System Program.
By J. Russell Snow and
Daniel Higgins
F
Figure 1. Components of the SDS.
Government Engineering ■ May-June 2013 ■ 22
complex water delivery system includ-
ing three major water delivery pipelines
that were constructed between the
1950s through the 1980s. As the popu-
lation gradually increased, Colorado
Springs water planners initiated a long-
term water planning process to meet
the water needs of Colorado Springs
through 2040. In 1996, the Colorado
Springs City Council passed a resolu-
tion adopting a water resource plan that
included a new system—SDS.
SDS was chosen to provide for a
redundant method of delivery for
Colorado Springs Colorado River Basin
water supply and ensure capacity for the
region’s growth. Phase 1 of this two-
phase project includes all of the compo-
nents necessary to begin delivering
water by April 2016. Components of
Phase 1 include a connection to the
existing North Outlet Works at Pueblo
Dam, about 50 miles of large-diameter
raw and finished water pipelines, three
raw water pump stations, and an
expandable 50-mgd water treatment
plant and finished water pump station.
Phase 2 is anticipated between 2020
and 2025 and includes increasing the
capacities of the water treatment plant
and pump stations and constructing
two new reservoirs. Figure 1 illustrates
the SDS components.
Before detailed design and construc-
tion of the SDS began, Colorado
Springs Utilities’ executive staff devel-
oped a mission statement and a set of
critical success factors (CSF) to help
guide and challenge the SDS team, as
well as support and achieve the mission.
To achieve the CSFs, Colorado
Springs Utilities selected an innovative
program delivery approach that was
proposed by MWH (www.mwhglob-
al.com), the selected program and con-
struction manager for the SDS
Program. It features an integrated pro-
gram management team comprising a
combination of Colorado Springs
Utilities and consultant staff in a co-
located, combined organization. Roles
in the program organization follow a
“right person, right job” methodology
selecting the best staff from Colorado
SDS Critical Success Factors
❒ Plan and implement the pro-
gram safely.
❒ Develop and implement a com-
prehensive plan.
❒ Clearly communicate and keep
commitments to stakeholders.
❒ Develop and maintain a pro-
gram controls system to effectively
manage scope, schedule, budget, and
quality requirements.
❒ Assemble a high performing,
collaborative team that is well led,
dedicated, appropriately resourced,
and decisive.
❒ Build and commission best
value assets that integrate with exist-
ing infrastructure and leverage the
core operating talent.
❒ Assure that key decisions are in
the best interest of the customer,
defensible, and well documented.
❒ Identify, evaluate, and manage
risk.
23 ■ Government Engineering ■ May-June 2013
Springs Utilities and consultant organi-
zations. The team works in a collabora-
tive manner to ensure that strategy is
developed and executed properly to
meet overall program objectives; issues
are anticipated, detected, and mitigat-
ed; and the broader team of consult-
ants, vendors, contractors, and suppli-
ers act as one to meet delivery chal-
lenges. By adhering to the integrated
program management approach and
maintaining focus on the CSFs, the
SDS has realized significant achieve-
ments to date.
Since the start of construction in
2010, the SDS has realized considerable
accomplishments due to effective plan-
ning, cost control, value and risk man-
agement, and high-performing teams.
Following is a selection of achievements
defining the success of the SDS to date.
❒ Completed and successfully tested
the new connection to Pueblo Dam—a
federal facility.
❒ Installed about 35 miles of
pipeline through March 2013—more
than half the total pipeline for Phase 1.
❒ Commenced construction of the
water treatment plant—one of the
largest and most complex components
of the project.
❒ Achieved significant milestone of
500,000 hours worked with no “lost-
time” safety incidents.
❒ Benefitted the local and regional
economy with more than $317 million
spent on SDS planning and construc-
tion through 2012—nearly $264 mil-
lion has stayed in Colorado, with more
than $200 million spent in the counties
where the SDS project is located.
❒ Engaged more than 300 business-
Colorado Springs Utilities’ Southern Delivery
System is managing programs and assets more
efficiently to provide water for current and
future generations.
Government Engineering ■ May-June 2013 ■ 24
es and organizations to support SDS to
date, with almost 170 of those within
the local counties and 98 within other
parts of Colorado.
❒ Advancing the program on sched-
ule to begin operation in April 2016
with forecasted completion about $68
million under the $1.003 billion Phase
1 budget.
Colorado Springs Utilities and MWH
have adopted a unique approach to the
delivery and integration of the SDS.
Although much of the present work is
focused on construction to deliver
water in 2016, early planning for com-
missioning, startup, and asset integra-
tion is well under way. For commission-
ing, startup, and asset integration to be
successful, both the SDS Program
delivery and Colorado Springs Utilities
water operations perspectives must be
considered to effectively manage, main-
tain, and operate the new SDS assets.
With this in mind, four activity streams
were created to accomplish these tasks:
commissioning and startup, asset inte-
gration, training, and warranty. Within
each activity stream, integrated teams
comprised of Colorado Springs Utilities
staff and MWH staff will lead and exe-
cute the work. The activity stream tasks
will range from equipment testing and
systems/tools integration to training
and optimization. Through implemen-
tation of early asset integration plan-
ning, the SDS is on target for successful
on-time delivery and smooth integra-
tion into Colorado Springs Utilities’
existing water system.
Mr. Snow, P.E., is the National
Conveyance Practice Leader at MWH
Global. Mr. Higgins is the Deputy
Program Director, Colorado Springs
Utilities.
GE

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Nuestro Campamento Pedagógico
Nuestro  Campamento PedagógicoNuestro  Campamento Pedagógico
Nuestro Campamento Pedagógicocristian
 
SIC Pack - Editora Banas
SIC Pack - Editora BanasSIC Pack - Editora Banas
SIC Pack - Editora BanasEditora Banas
 
2012 13 CCBB Metodología
2012 13 CCBB Metodología2012 13 CCBB Metodología
2012 13 CCBB MetodologíaMaribelCarmen
 
Intervención del Color
Intervención del ColorIntervención del Color
Intervención del Colordetijuana
 
Call to Action für eine bessere Response by TWT
Call to Action für eine bessere Response by TWTCall to Action für eine bessere Response by TWT
Call to Action für eine bessere Response by TWTTWT
 
Revista Instituto Telecom - 03
Revista Instituto Telecom - 03Revista Instituto Telecom - 03
Revista Instituto Telecom - 03Denise Vilardo
 

Viewers also liked (15)

Sharing knowledge
Sharing knowledgeSharing knowledge
Sharing knowledge
 
Village CISV Denver 2012
Village CISV Denver 2012Village CISV Denver 2012
Village CISV Denver 2012
 
Nuestro Campamento Pedagógico
Nuestro  Campamento PedagógicoNuestro  Campamento Pedagógico
Nuestro Campamento Pedagógico
 
María
MaríaMaría
María
 
Mario von Rickenbach - Mirage
Mario von Rickenbach - MirageMario von Rickenbach - Mirage
Mario von Rickenbach - Mirage
 
Luftwaffe ww2(pb)
Luftwaffe ww2(pb)Luftwaffe ww2(pb)
Luftwaffe ww2(pb)
 
SIC Pack - Editora Banas
SIC Pack - Editora BanasSIC Pack - Editora Banas
SIC Pack - Editora Banas
 
Gerações do SMC
Gerações do SMCGerações do SMC
Gerações do SMC
 
Oooooo # 05
Oooooo # 05Oooooo # 05
Oooooo # 05
 
2012 13 CCBB Metodología
2012 13 CCBB Metodología2012 13 CCBB Metodología
2012 13 CCBB Metodología
 
Introdução
IntroduçãoIntrodução
Introdução
 
Crisp
CrispCrisp
Crisp
 
Intervención del Color
Intervención del ColorIntervención del Color
Intervención del Color
 
Call to Action für eine bessere Response by TWT
Call to Action für eine bessere Response by TWTCall to Action für eine bessere Response by TWT
Call to Action für eine bessere Response by TWT
 
Revista Instituto Telecom - 03
Revista Instituto Telecom - 03Revista Instituto Telecom - 03
Revista Instituto Telecom - 03
 

Similar to Government Engineering May June 2013 -- Colorado Springs SDS

Euclid integrated planning opportunity rev12
Euclid integrated planning opportunity rev12Euclid integrated planning opportunity rev12
Euclid integrated planning opportunity rev12Kelly Quinn Sands
 
B Nicholls resume 2016-07-17
B Nicholls resume   2016-07-17B Nicholls resume   2016-07-17
B Nicholls resume 2016-07-17Brian Nicholls
 
C Arias EA Current_WEM3 2015 Paddock Wood
C Arias EA Current_WEM3 2015 Paddock WoodC Arias EA Current_WEM3 2015 Paddock Wood
C Arias EA Current_WEM3 2015 Paddock WoodArias Christian
 
Highland Park IL Strategic Plan Documentation
Highland Park IL Strategic Plan DocumentationHighland Park IL Strategic Plan Documentation
Highland Park IL Strategic Plan DocumentationTracy Quintana
 
Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance Review
Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance ReviewComprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance Review
Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance ReviewCity of College Station
 
Lewiston ID Strategic Plan
Lewiston ID Strategic PlanLewiston ID Strategic Plan
Lewiston ID Strategic PlanTracy Quintana
 
Kane County IL sustainabilityPlan
Kane County IL sustainabilityPlanKane County IL sustainabilityPlan
Kane County IL sustainabilityPlanKaren Kosky
 
Mammoth Lakes Downtown Revitalization Action Plan 2.0
Mammoth Lakes Downtown Revitalization Action Plan 2.0Mammoth Lakes Downtown Revitalization Action Plan 2.0
Mammoth Lakes Downtown Revitalization Action Plan 2.0Darin Dinsmore
 
Brian Nicholls resume 2016-08-11
Brian Nicholls resume   2016-08-11Brian Nicholls resume   2016-08-11
Brian Nicholls resume 2016-08-11Brian Nicholls
 
Water Operations Plan
Water Operations PlanWater Operations Plan
Water Operations PlanJake Doran
 
San mateo annual tma report
San mateo annual tma reportSan mateo annual tma report
San mateo annual tma reportAdina Levin
 
City of Gainesville, FL Public Works Department Strategic Plan FY 15-19
City of Gainesville, FL Public Works Department Strategic Plan FY 15-19City of Gainesville, FL Public Works Department Strategic Plan FY 15-19
City of Gainesville, FL Public Works Department Strategic Plan FY 15-19Tracy Quintana
 
spring 2013 employee report - final 3-14-2013
spring 2013 employee report - final 3-14-2013spring 2013 employee report - final 3-14-2013
spring 2013 employee report - final 3-14-2013Roberto Bonaccorso
 
Ottawa County, Michigan, Project Updates Newsletter
Ottawa County, Michigan, Project Updates NewsletterOttawa County, Michigan, Project Updates Newsletter
Ottawa County, Michigan, Project Updates NewsletterRichard Lakeberg
 
Mammoth Lakes Downtown Revitalization Plan by Darin Dinsmore
Mammoth Lakes Downtown Revitalization Plan by Darin DinsmoreMammoth Lakes Downtown Revitalization Plan by Darin Dinsmore
Mammoth Lakes Downtown Revitalization Plan by Darin DinsmoreDarin Dinsmore
 
Maryland Heights MO Strategic Plan
Maryland Heights MO Strategic PlanMaryland Heights MO Strategic Plan
Maryland Heights MO Strategic PlanTracy Quintana
 
Rockingham 2020
Rockingham 2020Rockingham 2020
Rockingham 2020James May
 

Similar to Government Engineering May June 2013 -- Colorado Springs SDS (20)

Improving Sewerage Services for Baghdad
Improving Sewerage Services for BaghdadImproving Sewerage Services for Baghdad
Improving Sewerage Services for Baghdad
 
Euclid integrated planning opportunity rev12
Euclid integrated planning opportunity rev12Euclid integrated planning opportunity rev12
Euclid integrated planning opportunity rev12
 
B Nicholls resume 2016-07-17
B Nicholls resume   2016-07-17B Nicholls resume   2016-07-17
B Nicholls resume 2016-07-17
 
C Arias EA Current_WEM3 2015 Paddock Wood
C Arias EA Current_WEM3 2015 Paddock WoodC Arias EA Current_WEM3 2015 Paddock Wood
C Arias EA Current_WEM3 2015 Paddock Wood
 
Highland Park IL Strategic Plan Documentation
Highland Park IL Strategic Plan DocumentationHighland Park IL Strategic Plan Documentation
Highland Park IL Strategic Plan Documentation
 
Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance Review
Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance ReviewComprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance Review
Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance Review
 
Lewiston ID Strategic Plan
Lewiston ID Strategic PlanLewiston ID Strategic Plan
Lewiston ID Strategic Plan
 
Kane County IL sustainabilityPlan
Kane County IL sustainabilityPlanKane County IL sustainabilityPlan
Kane County IL sustainabilityPlan
 
Trinity_Case-Study
Trinity_Case-StudyTrinity_Case-Study
Trinity_Case-Study
 
Mammoth Lakes Downtown Revitalization Action Plan 2.0
Mammoth Lakes Downtown Revitalization Action Plan 2.0Mammoth Lakes Downtown Revitalization Action Plan 2.0
Mammoth Lakes Downtown Revitalization Action Plan 2.0
 
Brian Nicholls resume 2016-08-11
Brian Nicholls resume   2016-08-11Brian Nicholls resume   2016-08-11
Brian Nicholls resume 2016-08-11
 
Water Operations Plan
Water Operations PlanWater Operations Plan
Water Operations Plan
 
San mateo annual tma report
San mateo annual tma reportSan mateo annual tma report
San mateo annual tma report
 
BWP-LG-Webinar
BWP-LG-WebinarBWP-LG-Webinar
BWP-LG-Webinar
 
City of Gainesville, FL Public Works Department Strategic Plan FY 15-19
City of Gainesville, FL Public Works Department Strategic Plan FY 15-19City of Gainesville, FL Public Works Department Strategic Plan FY 15-19
City of Gainesville, FL Public Works Department Strategic Plan FY 15-19
 
spring 2013 employee report - final 3-14-2013
spring 2013 employee report - final 3-14-2013spring 2013 employee report - final 3-14-2013
spring 2013 employee report - final 3-14-2013
 
Ottawa County, Michigan, Project Updates Newsletter
Ottawa County, Michigan, Project Updates NewsletterOttawa County, Michigan, Project Updates Newsletter
Ottawa County, Michigan, Project Updates Newsletter
 
Mammoth Lakes Downtown Revitalization Plan by Darin Dinsmore
Mammoth Lakes Downtown Revitalization Plan by Darin DinsmoreMammoth Lakes Downtown Revitalization Plan by Darin Dinsmore
Mammoth Lakes Downtown Revitalization Plan by Darin Dinsmore
 
Maryland Heights MO Strategic Plan
Maryland Heights MO Strategic PlanMaryland Heights MO Strategic Plan
Maryland Heights MO Strategic Plan
 
Rockingham 2020
Rockingham 2020Rockingham 2020
Rockingham 2020
 

More from Philip Tunnah

ENR SDS Article May 2015
ENR SDS Article May 2015ENR SDS Article May 2015
ENR SDS Article May 2015Philip Tunnah
 
Effective communication aids water project in Colorado
Effective communication aids water project in ColoradoEffective communication aids water project in Colorado
Effective communication aids water project in ColoradoPhilip Tunnah
 
UEP Slide Meet n greet
UEP Slide Meet n greetUEP Slide Meet n greet
UEP Slide Meet n greetPhilip Tunnah
 
APWA Florida Proj Award_UEP
APWA Florida Proj Award_UEPAPWA Florida Proj Award_UEP
APWA Florida Proj Award_UEPPhilip Tunnah
 
Finishing Strong_July 2014_Water & Wastes Digest
Finishing Strong_July 2014_Water & Wastes DigestFinishing Strong_July 2014_Water & Wastes Digest
Finishing Strong_July 2014_Water & Wastes DigestPhilip Tunnah
 

More from Philip Tunnah (8)

ENR SDS Article May 2015
ENR SDS Article May 2015ENR SDS Article May 2015
ENR SDS Article May 2015
 
Effective communication aids water project in Colorado
Effective communication aids water project in ColoradoEffective communication aids water project in Colorado
Effective communication aids water project in Colorado
 
ARH ENR Oct 2015
ARH ENR Oct 2015ARH ENR Oct 2015
ARH ENR Oct 2015
 
UEP Slide Meet n greet
UEP Slide Meet n greetUEP Slide Meet n greet
UEP Slide Meet n greet
 
UIM Jul 09
UIM Jul 09UIM Jul 09
UIM Jul 09
 
UEP Statistics
UEP StatisticsUEP Statistics
UEP Statistics
 
APWA Florida Proj Award_UEP
APWA Florida Proj Award_UEPAPWA Florida Proj Award_UEP
APWA Florida Proj Award_UEP
 
Finishing Strong_July 2014_Water & Wastes Digest
Finishing Strong_July 2014_Water & Wastes DigestFinishing Strong_July 2014_Water & Wastes Digest
Finishing Strong_July 2014_Water & Wastes Digest
 

Government Engineering May June 2013 -- Colorado Springs SDS

  • 1. 21 ■ Government Engineering ■ May-June 2013 or the past 20 years, U.S. water infrastructure has faced many challenges, including growing populations and a decreasing water sup- ply, aging assets, and declining budgets. Water providers, such as cities, water districts, and utilities, are being asked to manage programs and assets more effi- ciently while maintaining high levels of service. Some water providers have identified deficiencies and developed plans to mitigate and resolve their issues; however, many have failed to execute these plans. Colorado Springs Utilities’ Southern Delivery System (SDS) is an example of diligent water resource planning and execution to pro- vide water for current and future gener- ations. SDS is a southern Colorado project that will bring water from the Arkansas River to residents and busi- nesses in the City of Colorado Springs, the City of Fountain, Security Water District, and Pueblo West Metropolitan District. Colorado Springs is located remotely from any major bodies of water. Since its incorporation, the city has created a Securing Water for the Future Delivery and asset integration of the Southern Delivery System Program. By J. Russell Snow and Daniel Higgins F Figure 1. Components of the SDS.
  • 2. Government Engineering ■ May-June 2013 ■ 22 complex water delivery system includ- ing three major water delivery pipelines that were constructed between the 1950s through the 1980s. As the popu- lation gradually increased, Colorado Springs water planners initiated a long- term water planning process to meet the water needs of Colorado Springs through 2040. In 1996, the Colorado Springs City Council passed a resolu- tion adopting a water resource plan that included a new system—SDS. SDS was chosen to provide for a redundant method of delivery for Colorado Springs Colorado River Basin water supply and ensure capacity for the region’s growth. Phase 1 of this two- phase project includes all of the compo- nents necessary to begin delivering water by April 2016. Components of Phase 1 include a connection to the existing North Outlet Works at Pueblo Dam, about 50 miles of large-diameter raw and finished water pipelines, three raw water pump stations, and an expandable 50-mgd water treatment plant and finished water pump station. Phase 2 is anticipated between 2020 and 2025 and includes increasing the capacities of the water treatment plant and pump stations and constructing two new reservoirs. Figure 1 illustrates the SDS components. Before detailed design and construc- tion of the SDS began, Colorado Springs Utilities’ executive staff devel- oped a mission statement and a set of critical success factors (CSF) to help guide and challenge the SDS team, as well as support and achieve the mission. To achieve the CSFs, Colorado Springs Utilities selected an innovative program delivery approach that was proposed by MWH (www.mwhglob- al.com), the selected program and con- struction manager for the SDS Program. It features an integrated pro- gram management team comprising a combination of Colorado Springs Utilities and consultant staff in a co- located, combined organization. Roles in the program organization follow a “right person, right job” methodology selecting the best staff from Colorado SDS Critical Success Factors ❒ Plan and implement the pro- gram safely. ❒ Develop and implement a com- prehensive plan. ❒ Clearly communicate and keep commitments to stakeholders. ❒ Develop and maintain a pro- gram controls system to effectively manage scope, schedule, budget, and quality requirements. ❒ Assemble a high performing, collaborative team that is well led, dedicated, appropriately resourced, and decisive. ❒ Build and commission best value assets that integrate with exist- ing infrastructure and leverage the core operating talent. ❒ Assure that key decisions are in the best interest of the customer, defensible, and well documented. ❒ Identify, evaluate, and manage risk.
  • 3. 23 ■ Government Engineering ■ May-June 2013 Springs Utilities and consultant organi- zations. The team works in a collabora- tive manner to ensure that strategy is developed and executed properly to meet overall program objectives; issues are anticipated, detected, and mitigat- ed; and the broader team of consult- ants, vendors, contractors, and suppli- ers act as one to meet delivery chal- lenges. By adhering to the integrated program management approach and maintaining focus on the CSFs, the SDS has realized significant achieve- ments to date. Since the start of construction in 2010, the SDS has realized considerable accomplishments due to effective plan- ning, cost control, value and risk man- agement, and high-performing teams. Following is a selection of achievements defining the success of the SDS to date. ❒ Completed and successfully tested the new connection to Pueblo Dam—a federal facility. ❒ Installed about 35 miles of pipeline through March 2013—more than half the total pipeline for Phase 1. ❒ Commenced construction of the water treatment plant—one of the largest and most complex components of the project. ❒ Achieved significant milestone of 500,000 hours worked with no “lost- time” safety incidents. ❒ Benefitted the local and regional economy with more than $317 million spent on SDS planning and construc- tion through 2012—nearly $264 mil- lion has stayed in Colorado, with more than $200 million spent in the counties where the SDS project is located. ❒ Engaged more than 300 business- Colorado Springs Utilities’ Southern Delivery System is managing programs and assets more efficiently to provide water for current and future generations.
  • 4. Government Engineering ■ May-June 2013 ■ 24 es and organizations to support SDS to date, with almost 170 of those within the local counties and 98 within other parts of Colorado. ❒ Advancing the program on sched- ule to begin operation in April 2016 with forecasted completion about $68 million under the $1.003 billion Phase 1 budget. Colorado Springs Utilities and MWH have adopted a unique approach to the delivery and integration of the SDS. Although much of the present work is focused on construction to deliver water in 2016, early planning for com- missioning, startup, and asset integra- tion is well under way. For commission- ing, startup, and asset integration to be successful, both the SDS Program delivery and Colorado Springs Utilities water operations perspectives must be considered to effectively manage, main- tain, and operate the new SDS assets. With this in mind, four activity streams were created to accomplish these tasks: commissioning and startup, asset inte- gration, training, and warranty. Within each activity stream, integrated teams comprised of Colorado Springs Utilities staff and MWH staff will lead and exe- cute the work. The activity stream tasks will range from equipment testing and systems/tools integration to training and optimization. Through implemen- tation of early asset integration plan- ning, the SDS is on target for successful on-time delivery and smooth integra- tion into Colorado Springs Utilities’ existing water system. Mr. Snow, P.E., is the National Conveyance Practice Leader at MWH Global. Mr. Higgins is the Deputy Program Director, Colorado Springs Utilities. GE