SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 58
Creating a Walkability Surface for
Maricopa County
Parul Singh and Madison Davis
ASU MAS-GIS students
Co-Authors: Marc Adams, Jane Hurley, Lu Hao
Funding Source #: R01CA198915
Presentation Objective
To share the the steps taken and tools used to create a
geographic surface of walkability for Maricopa County
2
Overview
• Background on Walkability and WalkIT Arizona Study
• Four Components of the Walkability Index:
o Net Residential Density
o Intersection Density
o Transit Density
o Land Use Mix (Entropy)
• Results and Significance
3
Why is Walkability important?
U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services. September 2015
4
Vice Admiral Vivek Hallegere Murthy,
Surgeon General of the United States
WalkIT Arizona Study
“to test the effectiveness of interventions using
physical activity trackers, goal setting,
motivational text messages, monetary incentives
and health education to promote physical activity
behaviors...”
“in high and low walkable
communities”
Principal Investigator
Marc Adams, PhD, MPH
5
International Physical Activity and
Environment Network (IPEN) Study
IPEN GIS templates guided decisions to quantify built environment attributes for
physical activity
Templates include +100 pages of definitions, recommendations
www.ipenproject.org
Adams, Frank et al., 2015 Int’l J of Health Geographics
6
Software
• ESRI ArcGIS for Desktop v. 10.3
• Microsoft Excel
• SPSS
7
Calculating Walkability
• 4 components, each is a surface
• First find raw scores for each component
• Walkability Index = [ (z-score of net residential density)
+ 2*(z-score of intersection density)
+ (z-score of transit density)
+ (z-score of land use mix)]
8
Maricopa County
9
Focus Area
Phoenix
Urban Core
North Scottsdale
Suburban
10
Urban Core Suburban
Comparison
Same scale (resolution)
11
Preliminary Steps
12
Preliminary Steps
• Data Acquisition
o Maricopa County Assessor's Office
o Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG)
o Valley Metro
o U.S. Census Bureau
• Prep for use in context
o Projection: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Arizona Central FIPS 0202 (Meters)
• PUCs Reclassification (2251 down to 5)
o Main categories:
 residential
 retail
 office
 entertainment
 civic 13
PUCs Reclassification
● Residential
○ single & multiple family,mobile home, dormitory
○ exclude: hotels, motels, timeshared property
● Retail
○ retail stores, shopping malls, banking, gas stations, food-related
○ exclude: auto dealerships, “big box” mega stores ( >=300,000 sqf.)
● Office
○ administration, nonprofit institutions, medical services
○ exclude: warehouses, manufacturing offices, factories,
14
PUCs Reclassification
● Entertainment
○ bars, night clubs, theaters, museums
● Civic/ institutional
○ educational, religious, health, governmental, police, military facilities
● Multi-use codes (mixed-use)
○ Store & Office/Apartment
○ Office & Residence
■ double/ triple counted
15
Unit of Analysis
• Census Block Groups
o Aligns with population estimate in IPEN templates
• 100 Meter buffer
o Captures walkability/built environment features on edges
16
Block Group Buffer
17
Original Boundary
Walkability Components
1:Residential Density
18
Net Residential Density
• Ratio of residential housing units: residential land area in the buffer
o Residential= permanent, majority of the year, not easily moved
housing/dwelling units
o Includes single and multi family use
19
Net Residential Density
• High Density = many units in area
• Low Density = units spread out
20
Imagery: Google, Map Data, Digital Globe, 2016
Net Residential
Density
• Layer of all
residential parcels
o ~1.3 million parcels
• Includes Land Area
and Housing Unit
count fields
21
• Assign parcels to buffered
block groups
Net Residential Density
22
Net Residential Density
= Count
Area
23
Net Residential Density
Urban Core Suburban
24Lowest Highest
Walkability Components
2:Intersection Density
25
Intersection Density
• Ratio of intersections : land area
• Intersection: 3 or more walkable road segments intersect
• High Density = Many walkable intersections
• Low Density = Few walkable intersections
26
Intersection Density
Roads Included:
1. Neighborhood Streets
2. Byway - single lane of traffic in
each direction
3. Pedestrian Trail
4. Pedestrian Passageway
5. Rural Road
6. City Streets
27
Roads Excluded:
1. Interstate highway
2. Ramps
3. Unpaved Roads
4. Limited Access Highways
5. Freeways
6. Expressway
Pseudo Nodes
Dangling Nodes
Nodes not included
28
Intersection Density
True Nodes
29
Intersection Density
Intersection Density
• Assign Regular nodes to the Block group
30
Intersection Density
Intersection
Density =
Count/ Area
31
Summarize on Block group
buffer Field
Intersection Density
Urban Core Suburban
32Lowest Highest
Walkability Components
3:Transit Density
33
Transit Density
• Ratio of transit stops: land area
• Transit stops include bus and light rail
• Considered how many buses stop at each ‘physical’ stop
• High Transit Density = many transit stops
• Low Transit Density = few transit stops
34
Transit Density
● Bus Stops
● Light-Rail stops
35
Transit Density
Summarize on Block group
buffer Field
Transit
density =
Count/Area
36
Transit Density
Urban Core Suburban
37Lowest Highest
Walkability Components
4: Land Use Mix
38
Land Use Mix
• Calculation of entropy of land use types in block group buffer
• Raw Score always between 0 and 1
o 0 indicates only one land use present
o 1 indicates a perfectly even distribution of all land uses across the block
group buffer
39
Land Use Mix
• Repeat merge and summarize processes described to get the sum of land or
floor area in each block group
40
LandUseMix.gdb
ParcelArea_Office
ParcelArea_Retail
ParcelArea_Civic
ParcelArea_Entertainment
LivableArea_Residential
Land Use Mix
41
Land Use Mix
Urban Core Suburban
42Lowest Highest
Walkability Index
Walkability Index = [ (z-score of net residential density) + (z-score of intersection density) + (z-
score of transit density) + (z-score of retail floor area ratio) + (z-score of land use mix)]
43
Z- Score
Net Residential Density
Intersection Density
Transit Density
Land Use Mix
44
Lowest Highest
45
Z- Score
Net Residential Density
Intersection Density
Transit Density
Land Use Mix
Lowest Highest
46
Z- Score
Net Residential Density
Intersection Density
Transit Density
Land Use Mix
Lowest Highest
47
Z- Score
Net Residential Density
Intersection Density
Transit Density
Land Use Mix
Lowest Highest
Walkability Surface
…Combine all of the components...
48
Walkability
Surface
49
Lowest Highest
Net Residential Density
Intersection Density
Transit Density
Land Use Mix
Walkability
Urban Core Suburban
50
Crime-risk
51
Lowest Highest
Walkability-Crime analysis
52
Advantages of using GIS
• Analysis on Macroscale
• Use existing data
• Map Creation
• Patterns are clearly observed
• Help to select neighborhoods to test the effectiveness of the physical activity
intervention
53
Conclusion
• Able to target recruiting efforts to high and low walkable areas
• Gather participants for the WalkIT Arizona Research Study
Next Steps
● Virtual truth to make sure the surface makes sense
54
Thank you!
55
Contacts
Parul Singh Madison Davis
psingh26@asu.edu mbdavis6@asu.edu
Marc Adams, PhD, MPH
marc.adams@asu.edu
MAS-GIS 2015-16
56
57
Data Versions:
Maricopa County Block Groups, 2010 U.S. Census
Parcels, Maricopa County Assessor’s Office, 2015
Light Rail and Transit Stops, Valley Metro, 2015
Roads, U.S. Census TIGER/Line, 2015
58

More Related Content

Similar to Revised SWUC Slides

Land Use Strategic Master Plans
Land Use Strategic Master Plans Land Use Strategic Master Plans
Land Use Strategic Master Plans Carlos Jimenez
 
Proposed Pocket Parks Raster Analysis
Proposed Pocket Parks Raster AnalysisProposed Pocket Parks Raster Analysis
Proposed Pocket Parks Raster AnalysisElizabeth Wesley
 
Location, Location, Location: Leveraging Interactive Maps, Administrative, an...
Location, Location, Location: Leveraging Interactive Maps, Administrative, an...Location, Location, Location: Leveraging Interactive Maps, Administrative, an...
Location, Location, Location: Leveraging Interactive Maps, Administrative, an...soder145
 
Location, Location, Location
Location, Location, LocationLocation, Location, Location
Location, Location, Locationsoder145
 
Know Your Community: Data Power to the People
Know Your Community: Data Power to the PeopleKnow Your Community: Data Power to the People
Know Your Community: Data Power to the PeopleData Con LA
 
Location, Location, Location: Leveraging Interactive Maps, Administrative and...
Location, Location, Location: Leveraging Interactive Maps, Administrative and...Location, Location, Location: Leveraging Interactive Maps, Administrative and...
Location, Location, Location: Leveraging Interactive Maps, Administrative and...soder145
 
Planning Tools for Linking Rural Development and Transportation
Planning Tools for Linking Rural Development and TransportationPlanning Tools for Linking Rural Development and Transportation
Planning Tools for Linking Rural Development and TransportationRPO America
 
city-wide_public_space_assessment_guide_0.pdf
city-wide_public_space_assessment_guide_0.pdfcity-wide_public_space_assessment_guide_0.pdf
city-wide_public_space_assessment_guide_0.pdfNiketDalal3
 
Imagine Austin, second Community Forums presentation
Imagine Austin, second Community Forums presentationImagine Austin, second Community Forums presentation
Imagine Austin, second Community Forums presentationgclaxton
 
Positioning Your Neighborhood for Economic Development
Positioning Your Neighborhood for Economic DevelopmentPositioning Your Neighborhood for Economic Development
Positioning Your Neighborhood for Economic DevelopmentRWVentures
 
Presentation on tools June 7 2022.pptx
Presentation on tools June 7 2022.pptxPresentation on tools June 7 2022.pptx
Presentation on tools June 7 2022.pptxArnoldMisach1
 
Coffee Talk 7: The Trade Offs of Land Use Planning
Coffee Talk 7: The Trade Offs of Land Use PlanningCoffee Talk 7: The Trade Offs of Land Use Planning
Coffee Talk 7: The Trade Offs of Land Use PlanningWedgwood Community Council
 
Tree Equity Score: Catalyzing Urban Tree Action
Tree Equity Score: Catalyzing Urban Tree ActionTree Equity Score: Catalyzing Urban Tree Action
Tree Equity Score: Catalyzing Urban Tree ActionColleenSchoch
 
4. Importance of City Planning - Dr. Toe Aung Ycdc
4. Importance of City Planning - Dr. Toe Aung Ycdc4. Importance of City Planning - Dr. Toe Aung Ycdc
4. Importance of City Planning - Dr. Toe Aung YcdcEthical Sector
 

Similar to Revised SWUC Slides (20)

Land Use Strategic Master Plans
Land Use Strategic Master Plans Land Use Strategic Master Plans
Land Use Strategic Master Plans
 
Dever9/27 Scott Bernstein
Dever9/27 Scott BernsteinDever9/27 Scott Bernstein
Dever9/27 Scott Bernstein
 
Proposed Pocket Parks Raster Analysis
Proposed Pocket Parks Raster AnalysisProposed Pocket Parks Raster Analysis
Proposed Pocket Parks Raster Analysis
 
Location, Location, Location: Leveraging Interactive Maps, Administrative, an...
Location, Location, Location: Leveraging Interactive Maps, Administrative, an...Location, Location, Location: Leveraging Interactive Maps, Administrative, an...
Location, Location, Location: Leveraging Interactive Maps, Administrative, an...
 
Location, Location, Location
Location, Location, LocationLocation, Location, Location
Location, Location, Location
 
Know Your Community: Data Power to the People
Know Your Community: Data Power to the PeopleKnow Your Community: Data Power to the People
Know Your Community: Data Power to the People
 
Census Concepts and Programs (epan 2011)
Census Concepts and Programs (epan 2011)Census Concepts and Programs (epan 2011)
Census Concepts and Programs (epan 2011)
 
Location, Location, Location: Leveraging Interactive Maps, Administrative and...
Location, Location, Location: Leveraging Interactive Maps, Administrative and...Location, Location, Location: Leveraging Interactive Maps, Administrative and...
Location, Location, Location: Leveraging Interactive Maps, Administrative and...
 
Planning For Form Based Codes - Carlat CNU 17
Planning For Form Based Codes - Carlat CNU 17Planning For Form Based Codes - Carlat CNU 17
Planning For Form Based Codes - Carlat CNU 17
 
Planning Tools for Linking Rural Development and Transportation
Planning Tools for Linking Rural Development and TransportationPlanning Tools for Linking Rural Development and Transportation
Planning Tools for Linking Rural Development and Transportation
 
CKX: Wellbeing Toronto - More Than Just a Map
CKX: Wellbeing Toronto - More Than Just a MapCKX: Wellbeing Toronto - More Than Just a Map
CKX: Wellbeing Toronto - More Than Just a Map
 
city-wide_public_space_assessment_guide_0.pdf
city-wide_public_space_assessment_guide_0.pdfcity-wide_public_space_assessment_guide_0.pdf
city-wide_public_space_assessment_guide_0.pdf
 
Imagine Austin, second Community Forums presentation
Imagine Austin, second Community Forums presentationImagine Austin, second Community Forums presentation
Imagine Austin, second Community Forums presentation
 
Planning techniques
Planning techniquesPlanning techniques
Planning techniques
 
Positioning Your Neighborhood for Economic Development
Positioning Your Neighborhood for Economic DevelopmentPositioning Your Neighborhood for Economic Development
Positioning Your Neighborhood for Economic Development
 
Presentation on tools June 7 2022.pptx
Presentation on tools June 7 2022.pptxPresentation on tools June 7 2022.pptx
Presentation on tools June 7 2022.pptx
 
Coffee Talk 7: The Trade Offs of Land Use Planning
Coffee Talk 7: The Trade Offs of Land Use PlanningCoffee Talk 7: The Trade Offs of Land Use Planning
Coffee Talk 7: The Trade Offs of Land Use Planning
 
Intro_GIS.ppt
Intro_GIS.pptIntro_GIS.ppt
Intro_GIS.ppt
 
Tree Equity Score: Catalyzing Urban Tree Action
Tree Equity Score: Catalyzing Urban Tree ActionTree Equity Score: Catalyzing Urban Tree Action
Tree Equity Score: Catalyzing Urban Tree Action
 
4. Importance of City Planning - Dr. Toe Aung Ycdc
4. Importance of City Planning - Dr. Toe Aung Ycdc4. Importance of City Planning - Dr. Toe Aung Ycdc
4. Importance of City Planning - Dr. Toe Aung Ycdc
 

Revised SWUC Slides

Editor's Notes

  1. Drs. Adams and Frank co-developed a 107 page document of GIS templates for measuring built environment features and walkability while coordinating 12 countries in the IPEN Adult study.
  2. Area 9,224 mi² Population 4.009 million (2013)
  3. ***Service Layer Credits****
  4. Sources of data and year --2015 parcel data
  5. -Residential: non-movable dwelling, live permanently or mostly dormitory( and other school-related units) -retail: shopping malls including strip malls, neighborhood, community, regional shopping malls car wash facilities included becuz they come with some food stores and groceries. -Office: school and business administration, -medical services:include clinic and emergency but hospital. Parcels for hospital use have large portion of parking area. -civic: a). both public and private civic/ institutional counted in. b).residential and offices for religious use counted as religious use. when classifying the land use category, we look at the larger category instead of the subdivided type under the large one.
  6. -Entertainment: location for certain types of social activities, no recreational facilities for physical activities included -SFR status unknown: those parcels are likely in the abandoned or severely degraded (totally/partially vacant)condition, thus we define them as vacant land. -Food-related: exclude the multi-use with restaurants, such as hotels, resorts, shopping malls, office building. How many codes altogether? -- 2251
  7. 600 to 3,000 people
  8. 1,257,450 Parcels in 2111 block groups
  9. ***Service Layer Credits****
  10. Secondary roads are main arteries, usually in the U.S. Highway, State Highway or County Highway system. These roads have one or more lanes of traffic in each direction, may or may not be divided, and usually have at-grade intersections with many other roads and driveways. They often have both a local name and a route number. Generally a paved non-arterial street, road, or byway that usually has a single lane of traffic in each direction. Roads in this feature class may be privately or publicly maintained. Scenic park roads would be included in this feature class, as would (depending on the region of the country) some unpaved roads. A path that is used for walking, being either too narrow for or legally restricted from vehicular traffic. A path that is used for manual or small, motorized bicycles, being either too narrow for or legally restricted from vehicular traffic.
  11. Note: stops are counted by routes at each stop. A block group with 5 ‘physical’ stops but 1 stop has 2 different routes makes 4+2 = 6 transit stops in the bloNote: stops are counted by routes at each stop. A block group with 5 ‘physical’ stops but 1 stop has 2 different routes makes 4+2 = 6 transit stops in the block group
  12. ***Service Layer Credits****
  13. NO AIRPORTS: 040131138001 (BLOCK GROUP)
  14. ***Service Layer Credits****
  15. ***Service Layer Credits****
  16. (Advantages of using GIS both as an approach to walkability and in research) GIS allows us to work on a Macroscale to create a walkability surface using the existing data sources from Maricopa County Assessor’s Office, Valley Metro and Census Makes it easy to display the results on the maps-deeper insights and visualize: this allows the research study to recruit from high/low walkable communities to test effectiveness of the physical activity intervention GIS provides a very effective means for graphically conveying complex information. Layouts created with a GIS are extremely useful when included in reports and presentations.
  17. **LOGOS
  18. *Intentionally left blank*
  19. Extra Slide! Use data acquisition notes