Environmental comparison mailer vs. box
•
0 likes•111 views
A cosmetic customer of ours came to us wanting to switch to a more environmentally friendly option to ship their product in. The Jumbojacket 1/2" bubble mailer was the perfect solution. The 1/2" bubble would protect their product just as a box with void fill, plus it would drastically decrease their environmental impact both in the manufacturing of the package plus the waste saved by downsizing to a mailer vs. a box with void fill. Here you'll see the comparison of both packaging options. www.pac.com info@pac.com
Recommended
More Related Content
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (16)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Environmental comparison mailer vs. box
- 1. N/A 101 Tons Greenhouse Gasses 65,623 lbs of CO2 Greenhouse Gasses 154,329 lbs of CO2 Jumbojacket #2 .7 oz x 250,000 = 10,938 lbs of poly/year Corrugated Box .27 oz x 250,000 = 67,500 lbs of Corrugated / year Paper Dunnage .12 lbs x 250,000 = 30,000 lbs / year
- 2. 73 Barrels N/A 262,512 Gallons 585,450 Gallons (British Thermal Unit) 114 Million BTUs (British Thermal Unit) 910 Million BTUs Corrugated calculations: http://c.environmentalpaper.org Plastic calculations: Oil Use: http://www.savetheplasticbag.com Total Energy: http://enviroliteracy.org Greenhouse Gases: http://timeforchange.org Wastewater: http://www.pacificresearch.org