Criminal M.P. D.NO.22539 dated 18.06.2018 before SC

FILING INDEX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
M.P.(CRL.) NO. OF 2018
IN
WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL NO…….OF 2017(D.NO.2188)
WITH
M.A.NO.84/2017 IN WRIT CRL.D.NO. 3913 OF 2017
WITH
WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.136 OF 2016
WITH
WRIT PETITON (CIVIL) NO. 90 OF 2016
AND
IN THE MATTER OF ARTICLE 32 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA;
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE SUSPICIOUS
DEATH OF SMT. ASHA RANI DEVI
PETITIONER NO.02
AND
IN THE MATTER OF:
OM PRAKASH & ANR …………..PETITIONER
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ….RESPONDENT
S.N Particulars Copies Diary No.
1. Memo of Appearance 1 83672
2. Application for registration of
W.P.(Crl.)D.NO.2188 of 2017
along with Affidavit
1+3 83671
3. Annexures P-1 to P-61 1+3 83674
4. Application for seeking
permission to submit corrected
para 5 of proforma for first
listing along with Affidavit
1+3 83673
5. Annexure P-1 1+3 83674
Petitioner in Person
Filed on: 18.06.2018 (Om Prakash)
Diary No:22539 On behalf of Petitioner No.02
(Widow Asha Rani Devi)
RENTED ADDRESS: RZF-893, NETAJI SUBUSH
MARG, RAJ NAGAR PART-2
PALAM COLONY, NEW DELHI-
110077, DWARKA SEC-08
MOB: 9968337815
E-mail: om.poddar@gmail.com
PERMANENT ADDRESS: ASHA DEEP NIWAS
SONALI, KATIHAR, BIHAR-855114

MISCELLANEOUS PETITION CRIMINAL NO. OF 2018
IN
WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL D.NO. 2188 OF 2017
Petition under Order XV Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 with
A Prayer for registration of W.P.(Crl.)D.NO.2188 of 2017 & independent
inquiry/investigation into the circumstances surrounding the
suspicious death of Smt. Asha Rani Devi Petitioner No.02.
IN THE MATTER OF:
VERSUS
WITH
MEOMO OF APPEARANCE TO APPEAR AND ARGUE AS PETITIONER-
IN-PERSON ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER NO.02
PAPER BOOK
(FOR INDEX KINDLY SEE INSIDE)
PETITIONER IN PERSON
OM PRAKASH
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER NO.02
LATE SMT. ASHA RANI DEVI

INDEX
S.N Particulars Page No.
1. Memo of Appearance ‘A’-‘A1’
2. M.P. (Crl.) No…………………of 2018 1-54
Application in the matter of
suspicious death of Petitioner No.02
for registration W.P.(Crl.)No……….of 2017
(D.NO.2188) Lodged Dated 28.01.2017 under
Order XV Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rule,
2013 along with Affidavit
3. Annexure: P-1 55
True copy of email letter dated
16.11.2016 by Department of
Justice; Government of India to
Supreme Court of India
4.Annexure: P-2 56-57
True copy of online complaint
with Prime Minister Office at
the website of CPGRAMS vide
registration no.
PMOPG/E/2016/0599866 dated
22.12.2016
5. Annexure: P-3 58
True copy of online complaint with
President of India at the website of
Rashtrapati Bhawan vide registration no.
PRSEC/E/2016/16154 dated 30.12.2016
6. Annexure: P-4 59

12.01.2017 by Department of Justice;
Government of India to Supreme Court of
India
7. Annexure: P-5 60
India
8. Annexure: P-6 61-63
True copy of Lodgement Order dated
28.01.2017 in W.P.(Crl.)D.NO. 2188 of
2017 issued by Registrar, Supreme Court
of India under Order XV Rule 5 of the
Supreme Court Rules, 2013
9. Annexure: P-7 64
India
10. Annexure: P-8 65
India
11. Annexure: P-9 66-67

India
True copy of acknowledgement letter by
President of India against petition SL
NO. P1/B/0108170053 dated 01.08.2017
India
14. Annexure: P-12 70-72
True copy of order dated 08.09.2017 in
Complaint No. CIC/MOLAJ/C/2016/299945 by
Chief of CIC, New Delhi
True copy of online complaint to the
President of India vide registration NO.
PRSEC/E/2017/13122 dated 21.09.2017
16. Annexure: P-14 74-75
Government of Bihar vide registration NO.
GOVBH/E/2017/02318 and GOVBH/E/2017/02325
dated 26.09.2017
President of India vide registration NO.
PRSEC/E/2017/13766 dated 06.10.2017

Government of NCT of Delhi vide
registration no. GNCTD/E/2017/07298 dated
19.10.2017
19. Annexure: P-17 78-79
Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of
India vide registration no.
MINHA/E/2017/11575 and MINHA/E/2017/11578
dated 19.10.2017
20. Annexure: P-18 80-81
True copy of acknowledgement letter dated
03.11.2017 vide D.NO.22241/E-mail and
D.NO.22273/E-mail dated 20.10.2017 by
Commissioner of Police, Delhi
08.11.2017
True copy of complaint against SBI Branch
code 3127 vide Ticket No. PA312733480848
dated 08.11.2017
23. Annexure: P-21 84-87
code 3127 vide Ticket No. 3456597084 and
CS312733508596 and 3456749461 and

CS312733503842 and 3457371823 dated
09.11.2017
24. Annexure: P-22 88-100
True copy of Emergency AIIMS, New Delhi
medical sheet of Petitioner No.02 dated
09.11.2017
True copy of complaint no.
DHLTH/E/2017/07152 dated 10.11.2017
against AIIMS New Delhi with Ministry of
Health and Family welfare, Government of
India
26. Annexure: P-24 102-103
code 3127 vide Ticket No. 3462979186
dated 10.11.2017
code 3127 before SBI, RBO Purnia, Bihar
dated 10.11.2017
28. Annexure: P-26 105-108
True copy of postmortem report P.M. NO.
1904/2017 of petitioner no.02 Smt. Asha
Rani Devi dated 11.11.2017
True copy of police report vide
D.D.NO.12-B dated 11.11.2017 issued by PS
Palam Village, New Delhi

True copy of police statement by
petitioner no.01 before ASI Shyam Sunder,
P.S. Palam Village, New Delhi dated
11.11.2017
True copy of death certificate of
petitioner no.02 dated 11.11.2017 vide
registration no. MCDOLIR-0218-004900595
by SDMC Delhi
True copy of email letter vide Ticket No.
3462979186 dated 13.11.2017 by Central
Monitoring System (CMS),SBI
Government of India to Patna High Court
08.12.2017 by Grievances cell of AIIMS,
New Delhi to the petitioner
35. Annexure: P-33 115-116
Appeal No. CIC/SCOFI/A/2017/113204 by
36. Annexure: P-34 117-120

registration no. GNCTD/E/2017/08652 and
GNCTD/E/2017/08653 dated 9.12.2017
15.12.2017
38. Annexure: P-36 122-123
True copy of Acknowledgement letter dated
15.12.2017 vide D.NO. 27994/E-mail and
D.NO. 28027/E-mail dated 11/12/2017 by
Commissioner of Police, Delhi
39. Annexure: P-37 124-128
True copies of online complaint to the
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare,
Government of India vide registration no.
DHLTH/E/2017/07838 and DHLTH/E/2017/07840
and DHLTH/E/2017/07841 dated 18.12.2017
40. Annexure: P-38 129-132
True copies of online complaint to the
GNCTD/E/2017/08915 dated 18.12.2017
20.12.2017 vide D.NO.28337/E-mail dated
13.12.2017 by Commissioner of Police,
Delhi

21.12.2017 vide D.NO. 28566/E-mail dated
Delhi
Delhi
29.12.2017 by Grievances cell of AIIMS,
New Delhi to the petitioner
45. Annexure: P-43 137-140
True copies of email dated 30.12.2017 by
the petitioners to the Hon’ble Chief
Justice of Patna High Court
Delhi
47. Annexure: P-45 142-144
True copies of email letter dated
04.01.2018 to the Prime Minister Office
by Grievances cell of AIIMS, New Delhi
48. Annexure: P-46 145-146

49. Annexure: P-47 147-148
50. Annexure: P-48 149-150
18.01.2018 to the Ministry of Health and
Family welfare by Grievances cell of
AIIMS, New Delhi
51. Annexure: P-49 151-154
31.01.2018 by Bihar State Legal Service
Authority (BSLSA) to the petitioner
52. Annexure: P-50 155-157
True copy of order dated 09.03.2018 in in
53. Annexure: P-51 158-160
04.04.2018 to the President of India by
Grievances cell of AIIMS, New Delhi
54. Annexure: P-52 161-162
True copy of order dated 16.04.2018 in in

True copy of letter no.
DMC/DC/F.14/COMP.2356/2/2018/271315 dated
17.04.2018 by Delhi medical council to
the petitioner
56. Annexure: P-54 164-166
True copy of police inquiry report dated
18.04.2018 against complaint NO.
GOVBH/E/2017/02325 by S.P. Katihar
True copy of posthumous complaint vide
registration no. PMOPG/E/2018/0184337
dated 19.04.2018 by the petitioner
58. Annexure: P-56 168-169
True copy of letter from Section X SCI
dated 03.05.2018 to the petitioner
True copy of RTI against Department of
Justice, Government of India vide
registration number JUSTC/R/2018/50723
dated 22.04.2018 by the petitioner
60. Annexure: P-58 171-173
True copy of filing index and Index of
Annexures P-1 to P-5 vide D.NO.78087
dated 23.05.2018 in W.P.(Crl.) 136 of
2016 filed by the petitioner before
Supreme Court of India
61. Annexure: P-59 174-177
True copy of letter dated 28.05.2018
forwarded by Hon’ble Chief Minister of

Bihar to District Magistrate, Begusarai
and Secretary Law, Bihar
62. Annexure: P-60 178-196
True copy of detailed RTI with arguments
against Department of Justice, Government
of India bearing registration number
JUSTC/R/2018/51094 dated 31.05.2018 by
the petitioner
63. Annexure: P-61 197-198
True copy of order for next date of
hearing dated 28.06.2018 in Criminal Case
Complaint(P)No.5591 of 2013 by the SDJM
Court no.16, Begusarai Court, Bihar

IN
WITH
WITH
WITH
AND
AND
PETITIONER NO.02
AND
IN THE MATTER OF:
VERSUS
APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF WRIT PETITION
CRIMINAL NO………OF 2017(D.NO.2188) LODGED UNDER
ORDER XV RULE 5 OF THE SUPREME COURT RULES, 2013
AND CONSTITUTION OF INDEPENDENT
INQUIRY/INVESTIGATION INTO THE CIRCUMTANCES
SURROUNDING THE SUSPICIOUS DEATH OF SMT. ASHA
RANI DEVI PETITIONER NO.02.
To

Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India and His
Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme
Court of India. The Humble petition of the
Petitioner abovenamed.
MOST RESPECFULLY SHOWETH:
1. That the present miscellaneous petition
criminal under Article 32 of the Constitution of India
is being filed to enforce the Rights under Article 21 of
the Constitution of India along with/tagged with Writ
Petition (Criminal) No…………..of 2017(D.NO. 2188), D.NO.
17748/SCI/PIL(E)/2017, D.NO. 16043/SCI/PIL(E)/2018 M.A.
NO. 84/2017 in Writ Petition (Criminal) D.NO. 3913 of
2017, Writ Petition (Criminal) 136 of 2016 and Writ
Petition (Civil) 90 of 2016; whereby all petitions have
been either dismissed violating Order XXXVIII of Supreme
Court Rules, 2013 without any speaking order or Lodged
abusing power under Order XV Rule 5 of the Supreme Court
Rules, 2013 which led to petitioner No.02 Smt. Asha
Rani Devi to succumb to planned judicial murder on
11.11.2017 at New Delhi and forced petitioner No.01 Shri
Om Prakash to become underground and delay in
registration of Writ Petition (Criminal)No….. of
2017(D.NO. 2188) would cause another planned judicial
murder of petitioner No.01 Shri Om Prakash.
2. That the petitioner no.02 Smt. Asha Rani
Devi approached this Hon’ble Court with Writ Petition
(Criminal) 136 of 2016 under Article 32 of Constitution

of India to enforce Article 21 of the Constitution of
India, however she is being denied access to justice by
the Registrar on the one hand, violating set rules,
practice, procedures of this Hon’ble Court and
suppressing records in the office report; on the other
hand, two judges bench dismissed the petition on
21.10.2016 imposing liberty upon the petitioners to
approach High Court evading Order XXXVIII of Supreme
Court Rule, 2013; which has resulted in planned judicial
murder of petitioner no.02 on 11.11.2017 at New Delhi.
3. That the petitioner no.01 Shri Om Prakash
son of Petitioner no.02 Smt. Asha Rani Devi could not
perform the last rituals of his mother Petitioner no.02
at her own house at Sonaili, Katihar, Bihar due to
existence of N.B.W dated 08.09.2011 u/s 83 Cr.Pc. in
non-maintainable, false and frivolous 498A Criminal Case
Complaint (P) No. 5591 of 2013 at SDJM, Court No.16 at
Begusarai Court Bihar. Postmortem report, police
statement, police report and death certificate of Smt.
Asha Rani Devi herein petitioner no.02 have been filed
online with Bihar Police-CGRC vide Token No.
201804230020 and 201804170001.
4. That the petitioner no.01 is the only
survivor left in his family now.
5. That the present Miscellaneous Petition

Criminal is being filed seeking registration of W.P.
(Crl.)…….. of 2017 (D.NO. 2188) and independent
inquiry/investigation into the circumstances surrounding
the death of Late Smt. Asha Rani Devi herein petitioner
no.02 by a Commission of inquiry constituted by this
Hon’ble Court.
6. The factual matrix of the present
Miscellaneous Petition Criminal is as under:
7. That shocking details emerged from emergency
medical sheet of AIIMS at New Delhi which was collected
by the petitioner no.01 secretly due to suspicious
activity of the duty officer in the night shift on
9/11/2017 (who happened to be Bihari) at New Emergency
Medicine Ward, AIIMS at New Delhi, police statement
dated 11/11/2017 by the son of petitioner no.02, police
report dated 11/11/2017, recap of events dated 9/11 by
the son of petitioner no.02, death of petitioner no.02
was not natural.
8. In spite of that there is delightful/pernicious
silence from all authorities on this issue which
has created serious doubt in the mind of the
public at large about safety and security of
petitioner no.01 who is only survivor left in his family
now.

9. That disturbing questions emerged about Smt. Asha
Rani Devi’s death viz. about the procedure followed
after her death , when it was handed over to her
son herein petitioner no.01. Petitioner No.1 claims
that he asked for an F.I.R and an enquiry commission to
probe Smt. Asha Rani Devi’s’ death, however, none was
ever set up.
10. That petitioner no.02 Smt. Asha Rani Devi’s death
was suspicious -the fact that 100 was dialed for medico
legal case – a Panchanama should have been prepared,
and a medico legal case would have been filed. As
per legal procedure, the police department is
expected to collect and seal all the personal
belongings of the deceased, list them all in a panchnama
and hand them over to the family as they are petitioner
no.01 in this case. Petitioner no.01 was not given any
copy of a panchnama.
11. That the police refused to record the statement of
son of petitioner no.02 Smt. Asha Rani Devi on
11/11/2017 because son of petitioner no.02 wanted to
record the statement that Rtd. Justice S.B. Sinha of
Supreme Court of India and Shri Praveen Kumar from
Indian Defense Account Service both have murdered his
mother in a planned manner. Petitioners have filed more
than 10 criminal as well as civil cases against the
lobby/relatives of Rtd. Justice S.B. Sinha and Shri
Praveen Kumar since 2012 to 2017 before Supreme Court of

India. However, police did not record this statement of
son of petitioner no.02 Smt. Asha Rani Devi on
11/11/2017. Finally, son of Smt. Asha Rani Devi
petitioner no.02 has recorded this statement on his own
handwriting after the statement recorded by police on
11/11/2017. This document has also been collected by the
petitioner no.01 due to suspicious attitude/activity of
the police on 11/11/2017.
12. That the copy of police report (Ittellamat report)
which has been handed over to petitioner no.01 by the
police has also not recorded the name of Rtd. Justice
S.B. Sinha of Supreme Court of India and Shri Praveen
Kumar from Indian Defense Account Service. However, the
petitioner no.01 has recorded the name of both dialing
over 100 and PCR both on 11/11/2017.
13. That the petitioner no.01, questions: who was
tracking the petitioners over mobile on 9/11? Why
screening of emergency wrote “No O2 bed available
referred to SJH/Other Govt. Hospital”, the moment
petitioner entered into screening of emergency on 9/11?
Why doctors changed their mind at 14:00pm and allowed
access to emergency on 9/11? Under whose instructions
oxygen bed became available all of sudden at 15:00pm on
9/11? Under whose instructions oxygen bed became
unavailable all of sudden at 23:00pm on 9/11? Why duty
officer in the night shift on 9/11 (who happened to be
Bihari) at new emergency medicine ward, AIIM at New

Delhi forced the petitioners to sign LAMA when the
petitioner refused to shift to Safdarjung Hospital, New
Delhi at midnight on 9/11? What medication was
administered to her at AIIMS Hospital not disclosed by
AIIMS authority as on date? Why emergency medical sheet
not handed over to the petitioners by duty officer in
the night shift on 9/11? Under which circumstances
emergency medical sheet was collected by the petitioner
can be ascertained from the CCTV footage of 9/11 night?
Why COPD case being forced to sign LAMA and sent back
home at midnight with 47000 WBC
count, pO2 68.1 mmhg & pCo2 67.4 mmhg without x-ray
done? Why LAMA being accepted by the duty officer in the
night shift on 9/11 while petitioner no.01 refused to
shift to Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi in writing and
not given his original sign under pressure while
petitioner no.02 was unable to sign LAMA? Why petitioner
no.02 was not shifted to Geriatrics wards of AIIMS at
New Delhi while she was a senior citizen? Was there no
bed available whether in private ward or in general ward
or in Geriatrics wards of AIIMS at New Delhi on 9/11 to
save the life of a senior citizen whereas beds become
available 24X7 for VIPs at AIIMS at New Delhi? Why
police has not recorded the statement according to the
petitioner no.01? Why police did not register F.I.R
while Petitioner No.1 made allegations that there is
foul play in the death of petitioner no.02 by the nexus
of judges and doctors at AIIMS at New Delhi? Why
panchnama not done by police? Why medico legal case not

filed by Delhi Police? Why panchnama not handed over to
petitioner no.01 by Delhi Police?
14. That the above noted 18 questions of petitioner no.01
remained unanswered.
15. That Department of Justice, Government of
India forwarded the grievances of petitioners to the
Supreme Court of India on 16.11.2016 for appropriate
action. True copy of email letter dated 16.11.2016 by
Department of Justice; Government of India to Supreme
Court of India is annexed herein as Annexure P-1 (Page
from 55 to 55).
16. That the petitioner no.02 anticipated
apprehension of her planned judicial murder by the nexus
of Rtd. Justice S.B. Sinha of Supreme Court of India and
Shri Praveen Kumar from Indian Defense Account Service
therefore registered online complaint with Prime
Minister Office at the website of CPGRAMS vide
registration no. PMOPG/E/2016/0599866 on 22.12.2016.
True copy of online complaint with Prime Minister Office
at the website of CPGRAMS vide registration no.
PMOPG/E/2016/0599866 dated 22.12.2016 is annexed herein
as Annexure P-2 (Page from 56 to 57).
17. That the petitioner no.02 anticipated
apprehension of her planned judicial murder by the nexus

of Rtd. Justice S.B. Sinha of Supreme Court of India and
Shri Praveen Kumar from Indian Defense Account Service
therefore also registered an online complaint with
President of India at the website of Rashtrapati Bhawan
vide registration no. PRSEC/E/2016/16154 on 30.12.2016.
True copy of online complaint with President of India at
the website of Rashtrapati Bhawan vide registration no.
PRSEC/E/2016/16154 dated 30.12.2016 is annexed herein as
Annexure P-3 (Page from 58 to 58).
from 59 to 59).
from 60 to 60).
20. That the Lodgement Order dated 28.01.2017 in
W.P.(Crl.)D.NO. 2188 of 2017 entitled “Om Prakash & Anr
VS. Union of India & Ors” issued by Registrar, Supreme

Court of India under Order XV Rule 5 of the Supreme
Court Rules, 2013. True copy of Lodgement Order dated
28.01.2017 in W.P.(Crl.)D.NO. 2188 of 2017 issued by
Registrar, Supreme Court of India under Order XV Rule 5
of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 has been annexed herein
as Annexure P-6 (Page from 61 to 63)
from 64 to 64).
from 65 to 65).

from 66 to 67).
24. That the petitioner no.02 approached Hon’ble
the President of India and filed petition SL NO.
P1/B/0108170053 dated 01.08.2017 by hand with a prayer
for urgent action against corrupt organs of judiciary so
that she could visit her own house at Sonaili, Katihar,
Bihar in the eve of Durga Puja. True copy of
acknowledgement letter by President of India against
petition SL NO. P1/B/0108170053 dated 01.08.2017 is
annexed herein as Annexure P-10 (Page from 68 to 68).
from 69 to 69).
26. That the Chief of CIC, New Delhi passed an
order dated 08.09.2017 in Complaint No.
CIC/MOLAJ/C/2016/299945 against CPIO, Registrar General,
Patna High Court directing him to consider and exercise
his supervisory power to advise the District Judge(First
Appellate Authority) for expeditious disposal of the
First Appeal of the Complainant. True copy of order
dated 08.09.2017 in Complaint No.

CIC/MOLAJ/C/2016/299945 by Chief of CIC, New Delhi is
27. That the petitioner no.02 again approached
Hon’ble the President of India through online complaint
vide registration NO. PRSEC/E/2017/13122 dated
21.09.2017 with a prayer for urgent action against
corrupt organs of judiciary so that she could visit her
own house at Sonaili, Katihar, Bihar in the eve of Durga
Puja. True copy of online complaint to the President of
India vide registration NO. PRSEC/E/2017/13122 dated
21.09.2017 is annexed herein as Annexure P-13 (Page from
73 to 73).
28. That the petitioner no.02 approached
Government of Bihar through online Complaint at CPGRAMS
website vide registration NO. GOVBH/E/2017/02318 and
GOVBH/E/2017/02325 dated 26.09.2017 with a prayer for
urgent action against corrupt organs of judiciary so
Bihar in the eve of Durga Puja. True copy of online
complaint to the Government of Bihar vide registration
NO. GOVBH/E/2017/02318 and GOVBH/E/2017/02325 dated
26.09.2017 is annexed herein as Annexure P-14 (Page from
74 to 75).
the Prime Minister of India office on 27.09.2017 and

submitted petition by hand with a prayer for seeking
urgent appointment with Hon’ble the Prime Minister of
India to apprise against corrupt organs of judiciary so
Bihar in the eve of Durga Puja.
Hon’ble the President of India through online vide
registration NO. PRSEC/E/2017/13766 dated 06.10.2017
with a prayer for urgent action against corrupt organs
of judiciary so that she could visit her own house at
Sonaili, Katihar, Bihar in the eve of Durga Puja.
Hon’ble the President of India forwarded the grievance
to the Registrar General, Patna High Court for further
action, as appropriate. True copy of online complaint to
the President of India vide registration NO.
PRSEC/E/2017/13766 dated 06.10.2017 is annexed herein as
Government of NCT of Delhi through online complaint and
filed complaint vide registration no. GNCTD/E/2017/07298
dated 19.10.2017 against criminal trespass by Delhi
Police on 18.10.2017 at 10:00 PM into the petitioners’
rented house at New Delhi without any search warrant in
retaliation of CJM, SDJM case as the date of hearing
fixed on 18.10.2017 at SDJM Court no.16, Begusarai,
Bihar. Petitioners had previously filed complaint u/s
154(3) Cr.Pc., u/s 200 Cr.Pc. before P.S. Palam Village

vide diary no. 37B dated 30.05.2016. However, Police has
not registered F.I.R against it as of now. Petitioner
has also registered case dialing 100 with Delhi Police
on 19.10.2017. True copy of online complaint to the
Government of NCT of Delhi vide registration no.
GNCTD/E/2017/07298 dated 19.10.2017 is annexed herein as
Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India through
online complaint and filed complaint vide registration
no. MINHA/E/2017/11575 and MINHA/E/2017/11578 dated
19.10.2017 against criminal trespass by Delhi Police on
18.10.2017 at 10:00 PM into the petitioners’ rented
house at New Delhi without any search warrant in
retaliation of CJM, SDJM case as the date of hearing
fixed on 18.10.2017 at SDJM Court no.16, Begusarai,
Bihar. Petitioners had previously filed complaint u/s
154(3) Cr.Pc., u/s 200 Cr.Pc. before P.S. Palam Village
vide diary no. 37B dated 30.05.2016. However, Police has
not registered F.I.R against it as of now. Petitioner
has also registered case dialing 100 with Delhi Police
on 19.10.2017. True copy of online complaint to the
Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India vide
registration no. MINHA/E/2017/11575 and
MINHA/E/2017/11578 dated 19.10.2017 is annexed herein as

Commissioner of Police, Delhi against criminal trespass
by Delhi Police on 18.10.2017 at 10:00 PM into the
petitioners’ rented house at New Delhi without any
search warrant in retaliation of CJM, SDJM case as the
date of hearing fixed on 18.10.2017 at SDJM Court no.16,
Begusarai, Bihar. Commissioner of Police, Delhi
acknowledged the complaint on 03.11.2017 vide
D.NO.22241/E-mail and D.NO.22273/E-mail dated
20.10.2017. True copy of acknowledgement letter dated
03.11.2017 vide D.NO.22241/E-mail and D.NO.22273/E-mail
dated 20.10.2017 by Commissioner of Police, Delhi is
Government of NCT of Delhi through online complaint and
filed complaint vide registration no. GNCTD/E/2017/07831
dated 08.11.2017 against criminal trespass by Delhi
Police. True copy of online complaint to the Government
of NCT of Delhi vide registration no. GNCTD/E/2017/07831
dated 08.11.2017 is annexed herein as Annexure P-19
(Page from 82 to 82).
35. That the petitioner no.02 approached State
Bank of India Branch code 17633, Dwarka Sector-08,
Bagdola, New Delhi on 07.11.2017 to submit her “Life
Certificate” for continuation of family pension
maintained by Branch code 3127, ADB, Sonaili Bazar,

Katihar Bihar. However, “Life Certificate” for family
pension is not being uploaded on 07.11.2017 by the
Branch code 3127, ADB, Sonaili Bazar, Katihar Bihar.
Hence, the death was declared by the branch in advance.
Petitioner no.02 filed online complaint vide Ticket No.
PA312733480848 dated 07.11.2017 against it with Central
Monitoring System(CMS), SBI. After a complaint Branch
code 3127, ADB, Sonaili Bazar, Katihar Bihar replied
back against Ticket No. PA312733480848 that “Life
Certificate could not be uploaded for unavoidable
reason”. True copy of complaint against SBI Branch code
3127 vide Ticket No. PA312733480848 dated 08.11.2017 is
36. That the Petitioner no.02 again filed online
complaint vide Ticket No. 3456597084 and CS312733508596
and 3456749461 and CS312733503842 and 3457371823 dated
09.11.2017 against Branch code 3127, ADB, Sonaili Bazar,
Katihar Bihar with Central Monitoring System(CMS), SBI.
True copy of complaint against SBI Branch code 3127 vide
Ticket No. 3456597084 and CS312733508596 and 3456749461
and CS312733503842 and 3457371823 dated 09.11.2017 is
37. That Petitioner no.02 Smt. Asha Rani Devi
approached pulmonary and sleep disorder OPD of AIIMS at
New Delhi on 09.11.2017 for her normal COPD illness as
she was a follow-up case since 2010. Dr. Rajesh Sharma,
pulmonary and sleep disorder OPD of AIIMS at New Delhi

referred her to emergency and hospitalization.
Emergency, AIIMS at New Delhi refused to admit her
because of “no O2 beds available” at 11:30 am thereafter
doctors changed their mind and deleted “no O2 beds
available” from the prescription and kept her under red
area of emergency till 11:30 pm and forced her to sign
(LAMA) and sent her back home on 09.11.2017 at midnight.
38. In case of (LAMA) medical papers are not
returned back to the patient. Papers are kept with
hospital (AIIMS) authority. This material evidence was
collected by the petitioner no.01 due to misconduct or
suspicious activities of the doctors on 09.11.2017. True
copy of Emergency AIIMS, New Delhi medical sheet of
Petitioner No.02 dated 09.11.2017 is annexed herein as
39. That the movements of Petitioner no.02 at
AIIMS at New Delhi was tracked over her son’s mobile
(9968337815) by some big shots on 09.11.2017.
40. That the Petitioner no.02 was the last one
to submit her OPD card at 10:30 am on 09.11.2017 but
name was called at 11:00 am which was abnormal.
Normally, her turn comes at 12:30 pm or 1:00 pm in this
situation. More than 100 patients were waiting in queue
on 09.11.2017.
41. That son of Petitioner no.02 receives a

suspicious phone call through 011-25655602 by airport
authority of India, Government of India at 11:00 am
dated 09.11.2017 and asked to attend interview on
20.11.2017. Son of Petitioner no.02 Smt. Asha Rani Devi
herein Petitioner no.01 asked him to mark an email for
the same as he was in emergency of AIIMS at New Delhi.
However, he did not mark the email as on date.
42. The moment Petitioner no.02 entered the
emergency screening room at 11:30 am, doctor denied
access to the Petitioner no.02 to the emergency and
wrote “no o2 bed available.
43. At 2:00 pm doctors changed their mind and
deleted the “no 02 bed available” item from the
prescription and allowed access to Petitioner no.02 to
the emergency.
44. How oxygen beds became available all of
sudden at 14:00 pm? This act of Screening of Emergency
on 9/11 establishes that murder was planned and he was
acting under the influence of some big shots.
45. Petitioner no.02 was kept at red zone area at bed no.
R-9 till 23:30 pm and forced to sign LAMA and sent back
home at midnight with 47000 WBC
count, pO2 68.1 mmhg & pCo2 67.4 mmhg without x-ray
done.

46. That Petitioner 02 with acute breathlessness and
acute expectoration was sent back home at midnight with
47000 WBC count, pO2 68.1 mmhg & pCo2 67.4 mmhg
without x-ray done and without ambulance. This act of
duty officer in night shift on 9/11 establishes that
murder was planned and he was acting under the influence
of some big shots.
47. That Petitioner No.02 refused to sign LAMA.
Petitioner NO.01 and 02 have not signed LAMA on her own
handwriting.
48. That Petitioner NO. 02 refused to go to Safdarjang
Hospital, New Delhi in writing because she had prior
bitter experience of Safdarjang Hospital in 2010. In
2010, Petitioner NO. 02 approached Geriatric Clinic of
AIIMS at New Delhi vide OPD registration no. 800/2010 on
10.11.2010. Senior Resident, Geriatric Clinic of AIIMS
at New Delhi referred her to emergency AIIMS at New
Delhi on 10.11.2010. Emergency AIIMS at New Delhi vide
registration no. CS-100603/2010 wrote, “CSF as advised
by SR Medicine, regret no bed, refer to Safdarjang
Hospital (SJH)” in the midnight of 10.11.2010. However,
Safdarjang Hospital (SJH) also refused to admit her due
to non-availability of Oxygen bed. Safdarjang Hospital
(SJH) vide registration no. 240057 dated 11.11.2010
refused to admit her. Again petitioner no.02 had to come

back to Geriatrics OPD of AIIMS at New Delhi on
15.11.2010. Dr. A.B. Dey, Professor, Geriatric Services,
AIIMS, New Delhi, DMC Regd. No. 10673 directed Dr.
Gurjeet Singh, SR Medicine II, Room No.27 for
hospitalization of petitioner no.02. Dr. Gurjeet Singh,
SR Medicine II admitted petitioner no.02 on 16.11.2010
vide CR.NO. 181877 and discharged her on 23.11.2010.
Thus the life of petitioner no.02 was saved in 2010.
However, Dr. A.B. Dey, Geriatric Services, AIIMS, New
Delhi separated the petitioner no.02 from Geriatric
Service of AIIMS at New Delhi on 10.05.2012 and referred
her to the pulmonary Medicine and sleep disorder OPD of
AIIMS at New Delhi for further follow up and treatment.
Pulmonary Medicine & Sleep Disorder, O.P.D AIIMS at New
Delhi registered the petitioner no.02 vide Pulmonary OPD
registration no. 1648/2012 and later computerized it
vide UHID No. 101893012 which remained till the death of
petitioner no.02 on 11/11/2017 at New Delhi.
49. That the duty officer in night shift on 9/11 at New
Emergency Medicine Ward AIIMS at New Delhi forced
Petitioner NO.01 and 02 to sign LAMA, yet Petitioner
NO.01 and 02 not signed LAMA with their own original
signatures. This act of duty officer in night shift on
9/11 establishes that murder was planned and he was
acting under the influence of some big shots.
50. As the conditions of Petitioner no.02
further deteriorated in the night of 10.11.2017 because

of 47000 WBC counts pO2 68.1 mmhg & pCo2 67.4 mmhg and
developed breathlessness and acute expectoration and
next day being Saturday and Sunday therefore she lodged
online complaint with ministry of health and family
welfare department, government of India on 10.11.2017 at
midnight for urgent help and filed online complaint no.
DHLTH/E/2017/07152 against AIIMS New Delhi. However,
health and family welfare department, government of
India did not take immediate action against the
complaint on 10.11.2017. True copy of complaint no.
DHLTH/E/2017/07152 dated 10.11.2017 against AIIMS New
Delhi with Ministry of Health and Family welfare,
Government of India is annexed herein as Annexure P-23
51. That the Petitioner no.02 again filed online
complaint vide Ticket No. 3462979186 dated 10.11.2017
against Branch code 3127, ADB, Sonaili Bazar, Katihar
Bihar with Central Monitoring System(CMS), SBI. True
copy of complaint against SBI Branch code 3127 vide
Ticket No. 3462979186 dated 10.11.2017 is annexed herein
52. That the Petitioner no.02 escalated the same
complaint against SBI, Branch code 3127, ADB, Sonaili
Bazar, Katihar Bihar before State Bank of Bank of
India’s Regional Business Office (RBO), Purnia on
10.11.2017. True copy of complaint against SBI Branch
code 3127 before SBI, RBO Purnia, Bihar dated 10.11.2017

is annexed herein as Annexure P-25 (Page from 104 to 104
).
53. That the Petitioner no.01, son of Petitioner
no.02 has dialed 100 in the morning of 11.11.2017 and
registered complaint of planned murder by Rtd. Justice
S.B. Sinha from Supreme court of India and Praveen kumar
from Indian defense account service having nexus with
the doctors of AIIMS at new Delhi. PCR came and recorded
the message at wireless and handed over the case to the
ASI, Shyam Sunder, P.S. Palam Village, South West
district, New Delhi. ASI, Shyam Sunder, P.S. Palam
Village took the petitioner no.02 to Deen Dayal
Upadhayay Hospital, Hari Nagar, Ghanta Ghar at New
Delhi, where petitioner no.02 was declared dead. ASI,
Shyam Sunder, P.S. Palam Village did not record the
statement of son of petitioner no.02 according to him
and asked him to take the dead body without postmortem
done because it is a brought dead case and he declared
it a natural death. Son of petitioner no.02 strongly
protested against the act of police and loudly responded
to ASI, Shyam Sunder, P.S. Palam Village. Who are you to
decide whether the death is natural or not natural? It
is the court of Law to decide whether the death is
natural or not natural? Your job is to register F.I.R on
the ground of statement by the son of petitioner no.02
and on the ground of surrounding circumstances of death.
Son of petitioner no.02 reluctantly recorded his
statement on his own handwriting and firmly insisted for

postmortem. Hence, the postmortem of petitioner no.02
was conducted on 11/11/2017.
54. That the Postmortem of petitioner no.02
conducted on 11.11.2017 at Deen Dayal Upadhayay
Hospital, Hari Nagar, Ghanta Ghar at New Delhi. True
copy of postmortem report P.M. NO. 1904/2017 of
petitioner no.02 Smt. Asha Rani Devi dated 11.11.2017 is
annexed herein as Annexure P-26 (Page from 105 to 108
).
55. That ASI Shyam Sunder, P.S. Palam Village,
New Delhi handed over police report vide D.D.NO.12-B
dated 11.11.2017 to the petitioner no.01. True copy of
police report vide D.D.NO.12-B dated 11.11.2017 issued
by PS Palam Village, New Delhi is annexed herein as
56. That the petitioner no.01 and son of
petitioner no.02 recorded his police statement before
ASI Shyam Sunder, P.S. Palam Village, New Delhi on
11.11.2017 that Rtd. Justice S.B. Sinha from Supreme
Court of India and Shri Praveen Kumar from Indian
Defense Account Service both have murdered the
petitioner no.02 and his mother in a planned manner
because we have filed cases against them before Supreme
Court since 2012. True copy of police statement by
petitioner no.01 before ASI Shyam Sunder, P.S. Palam

Village, New Delhi dated 11.11.2017 is annexed herein as
57. That the death certificate of petitioner
no.02 has been issued by South Delhi Municipal
Corporation, West Zone of N.C.T of Delhi vide
registration no. MCDOLIR-0218-004900595. True copy of
death certificate of petitioner no.02 dated 11.11.2017
vide registration no. MCDOLIR-0218-004900595 by SDMC
Delhi is annexed herein as Annexure P-29 (Page from 111
to 111).
58. That the Central Monitoring System (CMS) of
SBI informed through Ticket No. 3462979186 that Life
Certificate has been uploaded on 13/11/2017 by SBI,
Branch code 3127, ADB, Sonaili Bazar, Katihar Bihar. SBI
Branch code 3127 uploaded Life Certificate of petitioner
no.02 after confirmation of death of petitioner no.02.
True copy of email letter vide Ticket No. 3462979186
dated 13.11.2017 by Central Monitoring System (CMS),SBI
).
59. That health and family welfare department,
government of India did not take immediate action
against the petitioner no.02’s complaint no.
DHLTH/E/2017/07152 dated 10.11.2017 rather took action
on 29.11.2017 and forwarded the same to the deputy
director AIIMS.

India forwarded the grievances of petitioner no.02 to
the Patna High Court on 30.11.2017 for appropriate
Department of Justice; Government of India to Patna High
Court is annexed herein as Annexure P-31 (Page from 113
to 113).
61. That reply of AIIMS came to the complainant
on 08.12.2017. The Grievances cell of AIIMS replied back
on 08.12.2017 against complaint no. DHLTH/E/2017/07152
dated 10.11.2017 to the Ministry of Health and Family
Welfare. However, Emergency medical prescription of
Petitioner no.02 Smt. Asha Rani Devi dated 09.11.2017
falsify the inquiry report of AIIMS at New Delhi dated.
08.12.2017. AIIMS inquiry report says, patient was
stabilized while emergency medical prescription of AIIMS
which was collected by the son of petitioner no.02 due
to suspicious activities of duty officer in the night
shift on 9/11, says patient condition was unstable. True
copy of email letter dated 08.12.2017 by Grievances cell
of AIIMS, New Delhi to the petitioner is annexed herein
order dated 08.12.2017 in Appeal No.
CIC/SCOFI/A/2017/113204 against CPIO, Add. Registrar

Supreme Court of India wherein he refused to intervene
into the matter of Supreme Court of India. However,
respondent and Add. Registrar Supreme Court of India
responded with respect to the complaint against Rtd.
Justice S.B. Sinha made by the petitioners dated
31.12.2016, that there is stay on disclosure of
information relating to complaints against Judges. True
copy of order dated 08.12.2017 in Appeal No.
CIC/SCOFI/A/2017/113204 by Chief of CIC, New Delhi is
GNCTD/E/2017/08652 and GNCTD/E/2017/08653 dated
9.12.2017 for registration of F.I.R against the planned
judicial murder of petitioner no.02. True copy of
online complaint to the Government of NCT of Delhi vide
64. That the petitioner no.01 again
approached Government of NCT of Delhi vide registration
no. GNCTD/E/2017/08841 dated 15.12.2017 for registration
of F.I.R against the planned judicial murder of
petitioner no.02. True copy of online complaint to the

Commissioner of Police, Delhi for registration of F.I.R
against the planned judicial murder of petitioner no.02.
Acknowledgement letter dated 15.12.2017 by Commissioner
of Police, Delhi vide D.NO. 27994/E-mail and D.NO.
28027/E-mail dated 11/12/2017. True copy of
Acknowledgement letter dated 15.12.2017 vide D.NO.
27994/E-mail and D.NO. 28027/E-mail dated 11/12/2017 by
Commissioner of Police, Delhi is annexed herein as
Chief Justice of India, Supreme Court of India on
17.12.2017 for order for registration of F.I.R against
the planned judicial murder of petitioner no.02.
Grievance Management System of Supreme Court of India
registered grievance of petitioner vide D.NO.
966/SCI/PIL(E)/2018 dated 17.12.2017.
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of
India vide registration no. DHLTH/E/2017/07838 and
DHLTH/E/2017/07840 and DHLTH/E/2017/07841 dated
18.12.2017 against planned murder of petitioner no.02 by
the nexus of doctors and judges. True copies of online
complaint to the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare,

Government of India vide registration no.
DHLTH/E/2017/07838 and DHLTH/E/2017/07840 and
DHLTH/E/2017/07841 dated 18.12.2017 are annexed herein
GNCTD/E/2017/08914 and GNCTD/E/2017/08915 dated
18.12.2017 for registration of F.I.R against the planned
judicial murder of petitioner no.02. True copies of
online complaint to the Government of NCT of Delhi vide
GNCTD/E/2017/08915 dated 18.12.2017 are annexed herein
69. That the Commissioner of Police, Delhi sent
acknowledgement letter dated 20.12.2017 against the
complaint vide D.NO.28337/E-mail dated 13.12.2017. True
copy of acknowledgement letter dated 20.12.2017 vide
D.NO.28337/E-mail dated 13.12.2017 by Commissioner of
Police, Delhi is annexed herein as Annexure P-39 (Page
from 133 to 133).
D.NO. 28566/E-mail dated 15.12.2017 by Commissioner of

from 134 to 134).
D.NO. 29452/E-mail dated 26.12.2017 by Commissioner of
from 135 to 135).
72. That the Grievances cell of AIIMS replied
back on 29.12.2017 against complaint no.
DHLTH/E/2017/07838 and DHLTH/E/2017/07840 and
DHLTH/E/2017/07841 dated 18.12.2017 to the Ministry of
Health and Family Welfare. Ironically, Asst. Admin
officer, AIIMS replied back that the petitioners have
not attached the copy of Emergency case sheet, without
it, it is not possible to judge above the complaint of
the patient and advised to provide the case sheet for
any further reply. It is pertinent to mention here that
in case of LAMA not a single paper is handed over to the
patient, forget about the entire Emergency case sheet.
True copy of email letter dated 29.12.2017 by Grievances
cell of AIIMS, New Delhi is annexed herein as Annexure
P-42 (Page from 136 to 136).
Chief Justice of India, Supreme Court of India on

the planned judicial murder of petitioner no.02.
Grievance Management System of Supreme Court of India
registered grievance of petitioner vide D.NO.
1913/SCI/PIL(E)/2018 dated 30.12.2017.
Chief Justice of Patna High Court through email dated
the planned judicial murder of petitioner no.02. True
copies of email dated 30.12.2017 by the petitioners to
the Hon’ble Chief Justice of Patna High Court is annexed
herein as Annexure P-43 (Page from 137 to 140).
acknowledgement letter on 01.01.2018 against the
complaint of planned murder of petitioner no.02 vide
D.NO.29834/E-mail dated 29.12.2017. True copy of
acknowledgement letter dated 01.01.2018 vide D.NO.
29834/E-mail dated 29.12.2017 by Commissioner of Police,
Delhi is annexed herein as Annexure P-44 (Page from 141
to 141).
76. That the Asstt. Admin Officer, Grievances
cell of AIIMS New Delhi replied back on 04.01.2018
against Prime Minister Office complaint no.
PMOPG/E/2017/0643405 dated 24.12.2017 to the Prime
Minister Office. True copies of email letter dated

04.01.2018 to the Prime Minister Office by Grievances
cell of AIIMS, New Delhi are annexed herein as Annexure
P-45 (Page from 142 to 144).
order dated 16.01.2018 in Appeal No.
CIC/SCOFI/A/2017/122864 against CPIO, Addl. Registrar,
Supreme Court of India. Chief of CIC refused to
intervene into the matter of Supreme Court of India.
However, respondent CPIO, Addl. Registrar, Supreme Court
of India responded that issue of non-registration of
Writ Petition (Crl.) D.NO. 2188 of 2017 is judicial in
nature. True copy of order dated 16.01.2018 in Appeal
No. CIC/SCOFI/A/2017/122864 by Chief of CIC, New Delhi
).
78. That the Chief of CIC, New Delhi passed
another order dated 16.01.2018 in Appeal No.
Supreme Court of India. True copy of order dated
16.01.2018 in Appeal No. CIC/SCOFI/A/2017/139611 by
Chief of CIC, New Delhi is annexed herein as Annexure P-
47 (Page from 147 to 148).
against Ministry of Health and Family welfare complaint
no. DHLTH/E/2017/08089 dated 30.12.2017 to the Ministry

of Health and Family welfare. True copies of email
letter dated 18.01.2018 to the Ministry of Health and
Family welfare by Grievances cell of AIIMS, New Delhi
are annexed herein as Annexure P-48 (Page from 149 to
150).
80. That Bihar State Legal Service Authority
(BSLSA) responded on 31.01.2018 against the email letter
of petitioners dated 30.12.2017 that since the cause of
action arose within the territorial jurisdiction of NCT
of Delhi, so Bihar State Legal Service Authority (BSLSA)
cannot provide any legal service in the matter. True
copies of email letter dated 31.01.2018 by Bihar State
Legal Service Authority (BSLSA) to the petitioner is
81. That the Chief of CIC, New Delhi again
passed an order dated 09.03.2018 in Appeal No.
Supreme Court of India. True copy of order dated
09.03.2018 in in Appeal No. CIC/SCOFI/A/2017/139611 by
50 (Page from 155 to 157).
82. That the petitioner no.01 approached Delhi
Medical Council with a complaint of medical
negligence/misconduct under Rule 32 of Delhi medical
council Rule 2003 vide receipt no. 55479 dated

03.04.2018.
against the President of India’s complaint no.
PRSEC/E/2017/16701 dated 10.12.2017 & PRSEC/E/2017/17057
dated 18.12.2017 to President of India. True copies of
email letter dated 04.04.2018 to the President of India
by Grievances cell of AIIMS, New Delhi are annexed
adjunct order dated 16.04.2018 in Appeal No.
Supreme Court of India. Chief of CIC defended the
position of executives and refused to intervene into the
judicial matter. However, respondent, CPIO, Addl.
Registrar, Supreme Court of India responded that the
correctness of the ‘office report’ cannot be adjudicated
under the RTI Act 2005. True copy of order dated
16.04.2018 in in Appeal No. CIC/SCOFI/A/2017/139611 by
52 (Page from 161 to 162).
85. That Delhi medical council disposed of the
complaint of petitioner dated 03.04.2018 on 17.04.2018
on the ground of cryptic and vague complaint, hence does
not merit any consideration. True copy of letter no.
DMC/DC/F.14/COMP.2356/2/2018/271315 dated 17.04.2018 by

Delhi medical council to the petitioner is annexed
86. That the Government of Bihar conducted
police inquiry against petitioner no.02’s online CPGRAMS
complaint NO. GOVBH/E/2017/02325 dated 26.09.2017
through S.P. Katihar. S.P. Katihar uploaded police
inquiry report dated 18.04.2018 against complaint NO.
GOVBH/E/2017/02325 at the website of CPGRAMS. True copy
of police inquiry report dated 18.04.2018 against
complaint NO. GOVBH/E/2017/02325 by S.P. Katihar is
87. That the petitioner no.02 followed up
for seeking urgent appointment with Hon’ble the Prime
Minister of India through email appt.pmo@gov.in w.e.f
16.09.2017 to 08.11.2017 to apprise against corrupt
organs of judiciary so that she could visit her own
house at Sonaili, Katihar, Bihar in the eve of Durga
Puja. However, Prime Minister of India office did not
pay any heed of the request of the petitioner no.02. The
same was filed as posthumous complaint vide registration
no. PMOPG/E/2018/0184337 dated 19.04.2018 by the
petitioner no.01. Prime Minister office forwarded it to
the Department of Law Justice & Legislative Affairs.
True copy of posthumous complaint vide registration no.
PMOPG/E/2018/0184337 dated 19.04.2018 by the petitioner
).

88. That in response to email letter dated
15.04.2018, 18.04.2018 and 21.04.2018 sent by the
petitioner no.01 addressed to Hon’ble the Chief Justice
of India; Section X of Supreme Court of India sent a
letter D.NO.4293/2016/X dated 03.05.2018 to the
petitioner no.01 to comply with the mandatory provision
of order VIII Rule 5 & 6(i) of the Supreme Court Rules,
2013. True copy of letter from Section X SCI dated
03.05.2018 to the petitioner is annexed herein as
89. That the underground petitioner no.01 filed
RTI against Department of Justice, Government of India
dated 22.04.2018 to seek complete information as C.J.M
Cum-PIO and District & Session Judge-Cum-Appellate
Authority, Civil Courts, Begusarai under the judicature
of Patna High Court failed to supply information from
the date 07.02.2011 of institution of Criminal Case
Complaint(P)No. 5591 of 2013 at C.J.M division Begusarai
Court, Bihar. Information supplied by C.J.M Cum-PIO and
District & Session Judge-Cum-Appellate Authority, Civil
Courts, Begusarai is misleading, false and frivolous.
The said RTI is bearing registration number
JUSTC/R/2018/50723 dated 22.04.2018. True copy of RTI
against Department of Justice, Government of India vide
registration number JUSTC/R/2018/50723 dated 22.04.2018
by the petitioner is annexed herein as Annexure P-57

90. That the petitioner no.01 responded the
letter from Section X of Supreme Court of India and
complied the mandatory provision of order VIII Rule 5 &
6(i) of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 and filed the
posthumous letter addressed to Hon’ble the Chief Justice
of India vide D.NO.78087 dated 23.05.2018 in W.P.(Crl.)
136 of 2016 through party in person filing counter of
Supreme Court of India. True copy of filing index and
Index of Annexures P-1 to P-5 vide D.NO.78087 dated
23.05.2018 in W.P.(Crl.) 136 of 2016 filed by the
petitioner before Supreme Court of India is annexed
91. That the petitioner no.01 replied back
against the Token No. 1534/2017 to Lokayukta Bihar under
the intimation of Hon’ble Governor and Chief Minister of
Bihar on 26.05.2018. The Hon’ble Chief Minister of Bihar
forwarded the same to the District Magistrate, Begusarai
and Secretary Law Bihar on 28.05.2018. True copy of
letter dated 28.05.2018 forwarded by Hon’ble Chief
Minister of Bihar to District Magistrate, Begusarai and
Secretary Law, Bihar is annexed herein as Annexure P-59
92. That even after posthumous letter D.NO.78087
dated 23.05.2018 in W.P.(Crl.) 136 of 2016 filed before
Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India; shielded SDJM, Ms.

Meena Kumari, Court no.16, Begusarai Court, Bihar dared
to extend next date of hearing on 28.06.2018 in non-
maintainable, false and frivolous 498-A Criminal Case
Complaint(P)No.5591 of 2013 and persisted N.B.W dated
08.09.2011 u/s 83 Cr.Pc. against the petitioners.
Aggrieved by this act of SDJM, underground petitioner
no.01 again filed detailed RTI with arguments against
Department of Justice, Government of India. The said RTI
is bearing registration number JUSTC/R/2018/51094 dated
31.05.2018. True copy of detailed RTI with arguments
against Department of Justice, Government of India
bearing registration number JUSTC/R/2018/51094 dated
31.05.2018 by the petitioner is annexed herein as
93. That shielded SDJM, Ms. Meena Kumari, Court
no.16, Begusarai Court, Bihar under Supreme Court of
India dared to extend next date of hearing on 28.06.2018
in non-maintainable, false and frivolous 498-A Criminal
Case Complaint(P)No.5591 of 2013 and persisted N.B.W
dated 08.09.2011 u/s 83 Cr.Pc. against the petitioners
against which Writ Petition (Criminal) No…………..of
2017(D.NO. 2188), D.NO. 17748/SCI/PIL(E)/2017, D.NO.
16043/SCI/PIL(E)/2018 M.A. NO. 84/2017 in Writ Petition
(Criminal) D.NO. 3913 of 2017, Writ Petition (Criminal)
136 of 2016 have been filed before Supreme Court of
India. True copy of order for next date of hearing dated
28.06.2018 in Criminal Case Complaint(P)No.5591 of 2013
by the SDJM Court no.16, Begusarai Court, Bihar is

annexed herein as Annexure P-61 (Page from 197 to 198
).
94. Under the above circumstances, since the petitioner
no.01 strongly feels that there is some foul play
in her death, and that she did not die a
natural death, taking into consideration the
circumstances surrounding her death, Hon’ble the Chief
Justice of India should look into this matter. This is a
case fit for a probe by a special investigation team
“irrespective of its outcome at this point of
time.” There should be independent inquiry into the
suspicions raised by petitioner no.01. This matter
needs a thorough investigation Otherwise, the truth
will not come out. There is foul play in the death of
petitioner no.02 by the nexus of judges and doctors at
AIIMS at New Delhi.
95. That the death of Smt. Asha Rani Devi
petitioner no.02 has occurred in suspicious
circumstances which got revealed from petitioner
no.01 so, it requires to be further investigated
through independent commission. Not enquiring into the
allegations made by the petitioner no.01 would send a
very wrong signal.
96. That in the circumstances, it is just, proper,
necessary, convenient and in the interest of justice
that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to order

constitution of a Commission of Enquiry to investigate
the events and circumstances surrounding the death
of Late Smt. Asha Rani Devi in the light of police
statement dated 11/11/2017 by petitioner no.01, police
report dated 11/11/2017 and recap of 9/11/2017 events
recorded by the petitioner no.01 in the petition.
GROUNDS:
Petitioner is praying for registration of W.P. (Crl.)……..
of 2017 (D.NO. 2188) lodged on 28.01.2017 under Order XV
Rule 5 of Supreme Court Rule, 2013 and for independent
inquiry/investigation into the circumstances surrounding
the death of Late Smt. Asha Rani Devi herein petitioner
no.02 on the following amongst other grounds: -
A. BECAUSE Petitioner no.02 denied access to
justice under Article 32 of Constitution of India
violating Order XXXVIII of Supreme Court Rule, 2013.
B. BECAUSE Petitioner no.02 denied access to
justice abusing power under Order XV Rule 5 of Supreme
Court Rule, 2013.
C. BECAUSE there is breach of Article 21 of the
Constitution of India, to say in other words, this
Right was not protected by this Hon’ble Court.

D. BECAUSE grievance against non-registration
of Writ Petition (Criminal)No….. of 2017(D.NO. 2188)
have been registered under Grievance Management System
of Supreme Court of India vide D.NO.
17748/SCI/PIL(E)/2017 and forwarded the same to Sec-IB
Supreme Court of India on 17.05.2017
E. BECAUSE grievances against non-registration
of Writ Petition (Criminal)No….. of 2017(D.NO. 2188)
again have been registered under Grievance Management
System of Supreme Court of India vide D.NO.
16043/SCI/PIL(E)/2018 and it is under process.
F. BECAUSE Chief of CIC has refused to
intervene into the matter of Supreme Court of India by
his Order dated 16.01.2018 in Appeal No.
CIC/SCOFI/A/2017/122864 pertaining to registration of
Writ Petition (Criminal)No….. of 2017(D.NO. 2188).
G. BECAUSE N.B.W dated 08.09.2011 u/s 83 Cr.Pc.
in non-maintainable, false and frivolous 498A Criminal
Case Complaint (P) No. 5591 of 2013 at SDJM, Court
No.16 at Begusarai Court Bihar still exists against
the petitioners.
H. BECAUSE cause of suspicious death of Smt.
Asha Rani Devi Petitioner no.02 arose within the
territorial jurisdiction of NCT of Delhi and two
states jurisdiction involved into the same cause of

action.
I. BECAUSE petitioner No.01 Shri Om Prakash has
been forced to become underground and delay in
murder of petitioner No.01 Shri Om Prakash who is only
survivor left in his family now.
J. BECAUSE the complaint against Rtd. Justice
S.B. Sinha has been made by the petitioners dated
31.12.2016 before Supreme Court of India and reply
through RTI Dy. No. 2191/RTI/16-17/SCI, appeal no. 44
of 2017 and order dated 08.12.2017 in Appeal No.
CIC/SCOFI/A/2017/113204 have been given by Supreme
Court of India that there is stay on disclosure of
information relating to complaints against Judges.
K. BECAUSE W.P.(Civil) 90 of 2016 against
illegal termination of service of the petitioner no.01
has been filed against Shri Praveen Kumar, Indian
Defense Account Service before Supreme Court of India
by the petitioner no.01 and Shri Praveen Kumar, Indian
Defense Account Service is also a respondent no.07 in
Writ Petition (Criminal)No….. of 2017(D.NO. 2188).
L. BECAUSE the petitioner no.02 had anticipated
apprehension of her planned judicial murder by the
nexus of Rtd. Justice S.B. Sinha of Supreme Court of

India and Shri Praveen Kumar from Indian Defense
Account Service therefore registered it online with
Prime Minister Office at the website of CPGRAMS vide
registration no. PMOPG/E/2016/0599866 on 22.12.2016.
M. BECAUSE Postmortem report reveals that cause
of death is cardiac shock due to cardiac temponade and
myocarditis.
N. BECAUSE Nexus of Judges with doctors at
AIIMS at New Delhi is responsible for the cardiac
shock as Smt. Asha Rani Devi was forced to Sign LAMA
and sent back home at midnight with 47000 WBC count;
low oxygen (O2) and high carbon-dioxide(Co2) as per
blood ABG report.
O. BECAUSE it was a planned murder by the nexus
of doctors at AIIMS at New Delhi and Rtd. Justice S.B.
Sinha of Supreme court of India & Praveen kumar from
Indian defense account service as petitioners had filed
10 cases, civil & criminal both before Supreme Court of
India against the Sinha lobby of Bihar since 2012 to
2017.
P. BECAUSE son of Smt. Asha Rani Devi, herein
petitioner no.01 has recorded the name of big shots,
Rtd. Justice S.B. Sinha of Supreme Court of India &
Praveen kumar from Indian defense account service in the
police statement with his own handwriting on 11.11.2017.

Q. BECAUSE police has not registered F.I.R
against the suspicious death of Smt. Asha Rani Devi
Petitioner no.02.
R. BECAUSE delightful/pernicious silence from
all authorities have been maintained on this issue
which has created serious doubt in the mind of
the public at large about safety and security of
petitioner no.01 who is only survivor left in his family
now.
PRAYER
It is most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court
may be pleased to:
(a) Order for registration of Writ Petition
(Criminal)No….. of 2017(D.NO. 2188).
(b) Constitute a Commission of Enquiry to investigate
the events and circumstances surrounding the
death of Late Smt. Asha Rani Devi in the
light of police statement dated 11/11, Police
report dated 11/11 and 9/11 events recorded by the
petitioner no.01 in the petition.
(c) Direct the Delhi Police for registration of F.I.R.
on the ground of police statement dated 11/11,

Police report dated 11/11 and 9/11 events recorded
by the petitioner no.01 in the petition.
(d) Consider all prayers from (i) to (ix) prayed in
the Writ Petition (Criminal)No….. of 2017(D.NO.
2188).
(e) Pass such other order/orders as this Hon'ble Court
may deem just and proper in the facts and
circumstances of the case.
DRAWN & FILED BY:
PETITIONER IN PERSON NO.01
OM PRAKASH
RZF-893, NETAJI SUBHASH MARG
RAJ NAGAR PART-2, PALAM COLONY,
NEW DELHI-110077, MOB: 9968337815
E-mail ID: om.poddar@gmail.com
ON BEHALF OF
PETITIONER NO.02
(DECEASED LATE SMT. ASHA RANI DEVI)
R/O ASHA DEEP NIWAS
SHUKKAR HATT, DURGA MANDIR
KANTIYA PANCHAYAT, P.S. KADWA
SONAILI, KATIHAR, BIHAR-
855114
NEW DELHI:
FILED ON : 18.06.2018.

IN
WITH
WITH
WITH
AND
AND
PETITIONER NO.02
AND
IN THE MATTER OF:
VERSUS
AFFIDAVIT
I, Om Prakash S/o Late D. N. Poddar, aged 45
years, R/o RZF/893, Netaji Subash Marg, Raj

Nagar Part-II, Palam Colony, New Delhi - 77,
do hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as
under:-
1.That I am the Petitioner in the above
matter and well conversant with the facts
of the case as such competent to swear
this affidavit.
2. That the contents of the accompanying
application in the matter of the
suspicious death of Smt. Asha Rani Devi
Petitioner No.02 for registration of
W.P.(Crl.)No………of 2017(D.NO.2188) lodged
under Order XV Rule 5 of the Supreme Court
Rules, 2013, which has been drafted by me
[para 01 to 96.], and [Para A to R.],
[Page 01 to 51] and I, As. and having
understood the contents thereof I say that
the facts state therein are correct which
are based on the official record.
3. That the accompanying application total 198 pages.’
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION:

I, the above-named deponent do hereby verify that the
facts stated in the above affidavit are true to my
knowledge and belief. No part of the same is false and
nothing material has been concealed therefrom.
Verified at New Delhi on this the 18th
day of June, 2018.
DEPONENT

MISCELLANEOUS PETITION CRIMINAL NO. OF 2018
IN
WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL D.NO. 2188 OF 2017
Petition under Order XV Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 with
A Prayer of matter NOT TO BE LISTED before Hon’ble Justice Navin
Sinha; Hon’ble Justice Ranjan Gagoi; Hon’ble Justice Prafulla
Chandra Pant; Hon’ble Justice Uday Umesh Lalit; Hon’ble Justice A.K.
Sikri and Hon’ble Justice Ashok Bhushan
IN THE MATTER OF:
VERSUS
WITH
CORRECTED PARA 5 OF THE PERFORMA FOR FIRST LISTING
PAPER BOOK
(FOR INDEX KINDLY SEE INSIDE)
PETITIONER IN PERSON
OM PRAKASH
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER NO.02
LATE SMT. ASHA RANI DEVI

INDEX
S.N Particulars Page No.
1. M.P. (Crl.)NO. ………… of 2018 1-8
Application for seeking permission
to submit corrected para 5 of
the Listing Performa against
M.P.(Crl.)No………of 2018 in
W.P.(Crl.)No………of 2017(D.NO.2188)
lodged under Order XV Rule 5 of
the Supreme Court Rules, 2013
along with Affidavit
2. Annexure: P-1 9-10
Corrected para 5 of the Performa for
first listing against M.P.(Crl.)No………of
2018 in W.P.(Crl.)No………of 2017(D.NO.2188)
lodged under Order XV Rule 5 of the
Supreme Court Rules, 2013

IN
WITH
WITH
WITH
AND
PETITIONER NO.02
AND
IN THE MATTER OF:
VERSUS
APPLICATION FOR SEEKING PERMISSION TO SUBMIT
CORRECTED PARA 5 OF THE PERFORMA FOR FIRST
LISTING AGAINST APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF
W.P.(CRL.)D.NO.2188 OF 2017 LODGED UNDER ORDER
XV RULE 5 OF THE SUPREME COURT RULES, 2013.
To

Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India and His
Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme
Court of India. The Humble petition of the
Petitioner abovenamed.
MOST RESPECFULLY SHOWETH:
1. That the present miscellaneous petition
criminal under Article 32 of the Constitution of India
is being filed to enforce the Rights under Article 21
of the Constitution of India along with/tagged with
Writ Petition (Criminal) No…………..of 2017(D.NO. 2188),
D.NO. 17748/SCI/PIL(E)/2017, D.NO.
16043/SCI/PIL(E)/2018 M.A. NO. 84/2017 in Writ
Petition (Criminal) D.NO. 3913 of 2017, Writ Petition
(Criminal) 136 of 2016 and Writ Petition (Civil) 90 of
2016; whereby all petitions have been either
dismissed violating Order XXXVIII of Supreme Court
Rules, 2013 without any speaking order or Lodged
abusing power under Order XV Rule 5 of the Supreme
Court Rules, 2013 which led to petitioner No.02 Smt.
Asha Rani Devi to succumb to planned judicial murder
on 11.11.2017 at New Delhi and forced petitioner No.01
Shri Om Prakash to become underground and delay in
murder of petitioner No.01 Shri Om Prakash, the
contents of which are requested to be read as part of
this application, as the same are not being repeated
here for the sake of brevity.

2. That the corrected para 5 of the Performa
for first listing against Miscellaneous Petition
Criminal in the matter of the suspicious death of Smt.
Asha Rani Devi Petitioner No.02 and for registration
of W.P.(Crl.)No………of 2017(D.NO.2188) lodged under
Order XV Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 has
been annexed herein as Annexure P-1 (Page from 09 to
10).
3. That the para 5 of the Performa for the first listing
has been corrected and hence M.P.(Crl.) No……..of 2018 NOT
TO BE LISTED BEFORE: Hon’ble Justice Navin Sinha; Hon’ble
Justice Ranjan Gagoi; Hon’ble Justice Prafulla Chandra
Pant; Hon’ble Justice Uday Umesh Lalit; Hon’ble Justice
A.K. Sikri and Hon’ble Justice Ashok Bhushan.
4. That there is likelihood of bias against Writ
Petition (Criminal) 136 of 2016 by the two judges’ bench
as laid down in the Yadav Vs. State of Haryana AIR 1987
SC 454.
PRAYER
It is most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court
may be pleased to:
(a) Allow the petitioners to submit a corrected para
5 of the Performa for first listing against the
Miscellaneous Petition Criminal in the matter of

the suspicious death of Smt. Asha Rani Devi
Petitioner No.02 and for registration of
W.P.(Crl.)No………of 2017(D.NO.2188) lodged under
Order XV Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013
for consideration of para 03 of this
petition/application by this Hon'ble Court as
the same is very necessary in the interest &
furtherance of justice.
b) Pass such other order/orders as this Hon'ble Court
may deem just and proper in the facts and
circumstances of the case.
DRAWN & FILED BY:
PETITIONER IN PERSON NO.01
OM PRAKASH
RZF-893, NETAJI SUBHASH MARG
RAJ NAGAR PART-2, PALAM COLONY,
NEW DELHI-110077, MOB: 9968337815
E-mail ID: om.poddar@gmail.com
ON BEHALF OF
PETITIONER NO.02
(DECEASED LATE SMT. ASHA RANI DEVI)
R/O ASHA DEEP NIWAS
SHUKKAR HATT, DURGA MANDIR
KANTIYA PANCHAYAT, P.S. KADWA
SONAILI, KATIHAR, BIHAR-
855114
NEW DELHI:
FILED ON : 18.06.2018.

Nagar Part-II, Palam Colony, New Delhi - 77,
do hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as
under:-
1.That I am the Petitioner in the above
matter and well conversant with the facts
of the case as such competent to swear
this affidavit.
2. That the contents of the accompanying
application for seeking permission to
submit corrected para 5 of the Performa
for first listing against Miscellaneous
Petition Criminal in the matter of the
suspicious death of Smt. Asha Rani Devi
Petitioner No.02 and for registration of
W.P.(Crl.)No………of 2017(D.NO.2188) lodged
under Order XV Rule 5 of the Supreme Court
Rules, 2013, which has been drafted by me
[para 01 to 04.], [Page 01 to 05] and I,
As. and having understood the contents
thereof I say that the facts state therein
are correct which are based on the
official record.
3. That the accompanying application for
seeking permission to submit corrected para
5 of the Performa for first listing total
10 pages.’

DEPONENT
VERIFICATION:
I, the above-named deponent do hereby verify
that the facts stated in the above affidavit
are true to my knowledge and belief. No part
of the same is false and nothing material has
been concealed therefrom.
Verified at New Delhi on this the 18th
day of
June, 2018.
DEPONENT

Criminal M.P. D.NO.22539 dated 18.06.2018 before SC

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (19)

Similar to Criminal M.P. D.NO.22539 dated 18.06.2018 before SC

Similar to Criminal M.P. D.NO.22539 dated 18.06.2018 before SC (20)

More from Om Prakash Poddar

More from Om Prakash Poddar (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Criminal M.P. D.NO.22539 dated 18.06.2018 before SC