SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
Archaeological Research on Food and
Community at Weedon Island, FL
Olajumoke Jegede, Jessica Foster, Kevin Weimer, Christina Perry Sampson
Abstract
The Weedon Island site in St. Petersburg, Florida is one of the
few places with an abundance of archeological information about
early Safety Harbor period communities. There is generally a lack
of knowledge about community practices, including the
organization of subsistence activities, during this time period.
This study of excavated material from the Weedon Island site will
provide more information about these practices. Specifically, the
project's goal is to determine how the already established systems
may have been altered by the introduction of other practices from
other communities. In addition, this study is questioning how
these new practices may have changed the surrounding social and
political outlook. An abundance of shell and bone was recovered
after conducting a magnetic survey and excavations at multiple
areas at the Weedon site. Artifacts, bones, and mollusk shells
were excavated, processed and brought to the study’s lab. There,
the shells and bones were sorted by species (e.g. lightning whelk,
crown conch, etc.), counted, weighed, and bagged for curation.
Because this study is an ongoing, the results are preliminary. The
results presented here demonstrate variation in the food remains
deposited around the site and show how multiple factors
contributed to the formation of the site's shell middens.
Introduction
This research aims to assess the subsistence practices of the people
inhabiting the Weedon Island site in Petersburg, Florida on Tampa
Bay during the Safety Harbor period. This time period dates
between A.D. 1000-1300. During this time period, the region was
undergoing a lot of change which could have led to new community
organization, new relations with other groups of people outside the
area to trade with, and new mounds being built. Since the site is
surrounded by water, the community that inhabited the area used a
lot of aquatic resources, which we can look at now to help develop
patterns leading to conclusions about the site. We are assessing how
the community at the time was organized and what their daily life
was like.
Materials and Methods
Samples of shell midden were collected during excavation at the
Weedon Island Site in Florida in 2014-2015. Excavations were
conducted by trowel in stratigraphic levels of up to 10cm, within
excavation units that ranged from 1x1m to 2x2m of area. All
excavated material was screened through 1/8” mesh in the field, to
remove soils and sediments from the samples. Midden materials
as well as larger artifacts were brought back to the lab.
The larger artifacts and bone were placed in separate bags to be
brushed and washed. The other bags were sorted individually
based on location. Smaller shell, bone, clay, etc. were normally in
these bags. Shells were sorted by shell type: unidentified large
gastropods, unidentified small gastropods, oysters,etc. Bone,
seeds, and other non-shell items were separated from the shell in
their own categories. The materials were then bagged and weighed
and the numbers were put on an excel spreadsheet for later data
analysis.
Research Questions
Did people eat and deposit different types of food at different areas of the site?
What factors contributed to the formation of shell midden deposits at the site?
Discussion
• Safety Harbor people at Weedon Island ate and deposited
different proportions of their main food resources at different
areas of the site.
• Patterns across the site may be due to the way the community
was set up or to changes over time.
• Because the majority of the areas had the highest quantity of
Eastern oyster and only specific areas on the site differed
from this pattern, it may be that this was caused by seasonal
availability or harvesting in different areas.
• Proportions of bone varied possibly due to an event where an
abundance of terrestrial foods/fish was preferred.
• Midden formation at the site was influenced by multiple
factors, including human behavior and the environment.
• Patterns in iron concretion vs. bone and barnacles vs. oyster
are examples of how midden formations could be influenced
by factors other than the behavior of past people.
• Iron concretion and barnacles quantities may have been
affected by local geology and ecology respectively. For
example for iron, by the meat content of deposits. For
barnacles, by the water temperature or salinity.
Conclusion
The lab work and analysis of the data is still being conducted.
Right now, it is evident the proportions of different food resources
varied around the site. Future research including radiocarbon
dating, seasonality analysis, and the analysis of artifacts will offer
more information for interpretation of the site. One of the major
questions remaining is determining if deposits are contemporaneous
with each other or were created over a longer period of time.
References
Mitchem, Jeffrey M. 2012 Safety Harbor: Mississippian Influence in the Circum-
Tampa Bay Region. In Late Prehistoric Florida: Archaeology at the Edge of the
Mississippian World, edited by Keith Ashley and Nancy Marie White, pp. 172-185.
University Press of Florida, Gainesville.
Weisman, Brent R., Jonathon Dean, Matthew O'Brien, and Lori Collins. 2005
Comprehensive Cultural Resource Survey of the Weedon Island Preserve, Pinellas
County, Florida. Report on file with University of South Florida.
MNI is the minimum number of individual shellfish of a given
species. Since both right and left halves of oysters were
counted, the MNI is half the total number of oyster valves since
each oyster is composed of a left and right side. The proportions
of the most common large, edible shellfish remains vary across
the site. The Eastern Oyster is the species most common among
the different areas. In these areas the MNI is generally greatest
of the Eastern Oyster. Site area 4, 5, and Block D and Unit T of
site area 3 seem to have followed a different pattern. In those
areas the Lightning Whelk is the most prominent species,
especially in site are 4 where the MNI of Lightning Whelk is far
higher than any other species in any other site.
Results
Barnacle weight is influenced more by the quantity of oyster than by the
total quantity of shell. In the graphs of data of Barnacle weight vs total
shell weight and barnacle weight vs oyster weight, the R-squared value
is only 0.1775 between barnacle weight vs total shell weight but is
0.3511 between barnacle weight vs oyster weight. This means that
barnacle weight and oyster weight have a stronger positive correlation
relative to total shell weight. Though this correlation between barnacle
weight and oyster weight is stronger than barnacle weight vs total shell
weight, neither total shell weight nor oyster weight have a very strong
correlation with barnacle weight.
The R2 value is very low (0.0033)
which indicates a low correlation
between the bone and iron by
weight. There must be other
factors that better explain the
variation in iron concretion weight
of deposits.
The ratio of bone to shell by site area is the highest in Area 1 (0.2) and
Area 5 (0.34). Areas 2,3, and 4 have ratios that are a lot lower (more than
double) than Areas 1 and 5. By Unit/Block, the bone to shell ratios are
the highest in Unit D (0.15) and Unit V (0.34). The rest of the
Units/Blocks have ratios that are significantly lower than Unit D and
Unit V, with an average around 0.02.
For Units A-H, Unit R, and Block D North, the
sum of the oyster weight was larger than the sum
of all of the large gastropod weight. This was
more common in Area 1 than the rest of the
Areas. For Unit I, Unit T, Block C, and Unit V
the sum of all the large gastropods weight was
larger than the sum of the oysters.
Ccrested oyster only appear in Unit A, C, I,
R, Block D North, and T. When crested
oyster did appear there were relatively low
amounts compared to eastern oyster MNI.
Edible Large Shellfish Distribution
Ratio of Bone to Shell by Excavation Unit
Eastern Oyster and Crested Oyster MNI Oyster vs Gastropod Shell Weight
Ratio of Iron Concretion
to Bone
Barnacle Weight vs Shell and Oyster Weight
Map showing the location of Weedon Island, FL
Excavation areas at Weedon Island

More Related Content

What's hot

CKlepac_BenthicEcologyMeeting_StLucieZooxanthellae
CKlepac_BenthicEcologyMeeting_StLucieZooxanthellaeCKlepac_BenthicEcologyMeeting_StLucieZooxanthellae
CKlepac_BenthicEcologyMeeting_StLucieZooxanthellaeVossLab
 
Seminar eco 2015
Seminar eco 2015Seminar eco 2015
Seminar eco 2015Robin Shin
 
Advancement2 2
Advancement2 2Advancement2 2
Advancement2 2Robin Shin
 
Freshwater protected areas and defining a conservation blueprint for desert f...
Freshwater protected areas and defining a conservation blueprint for desert f...Freshwater protected areas and defining a conservation blueprint for desert f...
Freshwater protected areas and defining a conservation blueprint for desert f...University of Washington
 
Nisqually Chinook Population Response to Large-Scale Estuary Restoration
Nisqually Chinook Population Response to Large-Scale Estuary RestorationNisqually Chinook Population Response to Large-Scale Estuary Restoration
Nisqually Chinook Population Response to Large-Scale Estuary RestorationNisqually River Council
 
The future biogeography of freshwater fishes
The future biogeography of freshwater fishesThe future biogeography of freshwater fishes
The future biogeography of freshwater fishesUniversity of Washington
 
Abundance of commercial bivalves
Abundance of commercial bivalvesAbundance of commercial bivalves
Abundance of commercial bivalvesRodney Peñafiel
 
7_PDFsam_FBA_NEWS_70_WINTER_2016
7_PDFsam_FBA_NEWS_70_WINTER_20167_PDFsam_FBA_NEWS_70_WINTER_2016
7_PDFsam_FBA_NEWS_70_WINTER_2016Alex Seeney
 
Trophic downgrading of planet earth
Trophic downgrading of planet earthTrophic downgrading of planet earth
Trophic downgrading of planet earthLoretta Roberson
 
Hernández-Terrones et al. (2010) Groundwater pollution in a karstic region (...
Hernández-Terrones et al. (2010) Groundwater pollution in a karstic region (...Hernández-Terrones et al. (2010) Groundwater pollution in a karstic region (...
Hernández-Terrones et al. (2010) Groundwater pollution in a karstic region (...Emiliano Monroy Ríos
 
Weber River Partnership native species presentation
Weber River Partnership native species presentationWeber River Partnership native species presentation
Weber River Partnership native species presentationPaul Thompson
 
2011 nutrient enrichment caused by marine cage
2011 nutrient enrichment caused by marine cage2011 nutrient enrichment caused by marine cage
2011 nutrient enrichment caused by marine cageearambulm3
 
A Quantitative Study of the Productivity of the Foraminifera in the Sea
A Quantitative Study of the Productivity of the Foraminifera in the SeaA Quantitative Study of the Productivity of the Foraminifera in the Sea
A Quantitative Study of the Productivity of the Foraminifera in the SeaNicha Tatsaneeyapan
 
Tulevech_Effects_of_Shoreline_Structure_on_Fish_Habitat_Use_and_Schooling_Beh...
Tulevech_Effects_of_Shoreline_Structure_on_Fish_Habitat_Use_and_Schooling_Beh...Tulevech_Effects_of_Shoreline_Structure_on_Fish_Habitat_Use_and_Schooling_Beh...
Tulevech_Effects_of_Shoreline_Structure_on_Fish_Habitat_Use_and_Schooling_Beh...Steven Tulevech
 

What's hot (20)

CKlepac_BenthicEcologyMeeting_StLucieZooxanthellae
CKlepac_BenthicEcologyMeeting_StLucieZooxanthellaeCKlepac_BenthicEcologyMeeting_StLucieZooxanthellae
CKlepac_BenthicEcologyMeeting_StLucieZooxanthellae
 
Seminar eco 2015
Seminar eco 2015Seminar eco 2015
Seminar eco 2015
 
Otolith2
Otolith2Otolith2
Otolith2
 
Advancement2 2
Advancement2 2Advancement2 2
Advancement2 2
 
Freshwater protected areas and defining a conservation blueprint for desert f...
Freshwater protected areas and defining a conservation blueprint for desert f...Freshwater protected areas and defining a conservation blueprint for desert f...
Freshwater protected areas and defining a conservation blueprint for desert f...
 
Nisqually Chinook Population Response to Large-Scale Estuary Restoration
Nisqually Chinook Population Response to Large-Scale Estuary RestorationNisqually Chinook Population Response to Large-Scale Estuary Restoration
Nisqually Chinook Population Response to Large-Scale Estuary Restoration
 
The future biogeography of freshwater fishes
The future biogeography of freshwater fishesThe future biogeography of freshwater fishes
The future biogeography of freshwater fishes
 
Stromatolites
StromatolitesStromatolites
Stromatolites
 
Abundance of commercial bivalves
Abundance of commercial bivalvesAbundance of commercial bivalves
Abundance of commercial bivalves
 
7_PDFsam_FBA_NEWS_70_WINTER_2016
7_PDFsam_FBA_NEWS_70_WINTER_20167_PDFsam_FBA_NEWS_70_WINTER_2016
7_PDFsam_FBA_NEWS_70_WINTER_2016
 
Lindholm_etal_2015
Lindholm_etal_2015Lindholm_etal_2015
Lindholm_etal_2015
 
Stromatolites and MISS
Stromatolites and MISS Stromatolites and MISS
Stromatolites and MISS
 
Trophic downgrading of planet earth
Trophic downgrading of planet earthTrophic downgrading of planet earth
Trophic downgrading of planet earth
 
Hernández-Terrones et al. (2010) Groundwater pollution in a karstic region (...
Hernández-Terrones et al. (2010) Groundwater pollution in a karstic region (...Hernández-Terrones et al. (2010) Groundwater pollution in a karstic region (...
Hernández-Terrones et al. (2010) Groundwater pollution in a karstic region (...
 
Weber River Partnership native species presentation
Weber River Partnership native species presentationWeber River Partnership native species presentation
Weber River Partnership native species presentation
 
2011 nutrient enrichment caused by marine cage
2011 nutrient enrichment caused by marine cage2011 nutrient enrichment caused by marine cage
2011 nutrient enrichment caused by marine cage
 
DE Poster Slide V4
DE Poster Slide V4DE Poster Slide V4
DE Poster Slide V4
 
Lamprey Unknowns - ODFW / Clemens
Lamprey Unknowns - ODFW / ClemensLamprey Unknowns - ODFW / Clemens
Lamprey Unknowns - ODFW / Clemens
 
A Quantitative Study of the Productivity of the Foraminifera in the Sea
A Quantitative Study of the Productivity of the Foraminifera in the SeaA Quantitative Study of the Productivity of the Foraminifera in the Sea
A Quantitative Study of the Productivity of the Foraminifera in the Sea
 
Tulevech_Effects_of_Shoreline_Structure_on_Fish_Habitat_Use_and_Schooling_Beh...
Tulevech_Effects_of_Shoreline_Structure_on_Fish_Habitat_Use_and_Schooling_Beh...Tulevech_Effects_of_Shoreline_Structure_on_Fish_Habitat_Use_and_Schooling_Beh...
Tulevech_Effects_of_Shoreline_Structure_on_Fish_Habitat_Use_and_Schooling_Beh...
 

Similar to Archaeological Research on Food and Community at Weedon Island, FL

nearshore_fish_fauna_of_bonne_bay
nearshore_fish_fauna_of_bonne_baynearshore_fish_fauna_of_bonne_bay
nearshore_fish_fauna_of_bonne_bayJens J. Currie
 
Emerald Shiner Publication
Emerald Shiner PublicationEmerald Shiner Publication
Emerald Shiner PublicationScott DesRosiers
 
Atkinson et al 2015 Length-weight Emerald shiner
Atkinson et al 2015 Length-weight Emerald shinerAtkinson et al 2015 Length-weight Emerald shiner
Atkinson et al 2015 Length-weight Emerald shinerThomas Simon
 
(FINAL) ROUGH DRAFT FOR SENIOR RESEARCH Jennifer Edit 4-14-15
(FINAL) ROUGH DRAFT FOR SENIOR RESEARCH  Jennifer Edit 4-14-15(FINAL) ROUGH DRAFT FOR SENIOR RESEARCH  Jennifer Edit 4-14-15
(FINAL) ROUGH DRAFT FOR SENIOR RESEARCH Jennifer Edit 4-14-15Jennifer Cherry
 
Lloyst et al 2015 (nearshore habitat stocked eel)
Lloyst et al 2015 (nearshore habitat stocked eel)Lloyst et al 2015 (nearshore habitat stocked eel)
Lloyst et al 2015 (nearshore habitat stocked eel)Megan Lloyst
 
Fossils, Geologic Time, Dating, and Resources
Fossils, Geologic Time, Dating, and ResourcesFossils, Geologic Time, Dating, and Resources
Fossils, Geologic Time, Dating, and Resourcesrebelbrindley
 
23 Benthic Methods Freshwater Sci 2013
23 Benthic Methods Freshwater Sci 201323 Benthic Methods Freshwater Sci 2013
23 Benthic Methods Freshwater Sci 2013Jacob Villalobos
 
RS3608_IWC Vol_14 2014_Cover.pdf-14pp1_14_Hamilton_Lindsay
RS3608_IWC Vol_14 2014_Cover.pdf-14pp1_14_Hamilton_LindsayRS3608_IWC Vol_14 2014_Cover.pdf-14pp1_14_Hamilton_Lindsay
RS3608_IWC Vol_14 2014_Cover.pdf-14pp1_14_Hamilton_LindsayKurtis Lindsay
 
Why The Coalbed Methane
Why The Coalbed MethaneWhy The Coalbed Methane
Why The Coalbed MethaneTanya Williams
 
Abstract_Findabhair_Ni_Fhaolain
Abstract_Findabhair_Ni_FhaolainAbstract_Findabhair_Ni_Fhaolain
Abstract_Findabhair_Ni_FhaolainFindabhair N
 
Belize Poster with current and DO temp.pptx
Belize Poster with current and DO temp.pptxBelize Poster with current and DO temp.pptx
Belize Poster with current and DO temp.pptxShannon Dexter
 
Joshua Seidman Honors Thesis Rough Draft 2.4 enm
Joshua Seidman Honors Thesis Rough Draft 2.4 enmJoshua Seidman Honors Thesis Rough Draft 2.4 enm
Joshua Seidman Honors Thesis Rough Draft 2.4 enmJoshua Seidman
 

Similar to Archaeological Research on Food and Community at Weedon Island, FL (17)

nearshore_fish_fauna_of_bonne_bay
nearshore_fish_fauna_of_bonne_baynearshore_fish_fauna_of_bonne_bay
nearshore_fish_fauna_of_bonne_bay
 
Emerald Shiner Publication
Emerald Shiner PublicationEmerald Shiner Publication
Emerald Shiner Publication
 
Atkinson et al 2015 Length-weight Emerald shiner
Atkinson et al 2015 Length-weight Emerald shinerAtkinson et al 2015 Length-weight Emerald shiner
Atkinson et al 2015 Length-weight Emerald shiner
 
(FINAL) ROUGH DRAFT FOR SENIOR RESEARCH Jennifer Edit 4-14-15
(FINAL) ROUGH DRAFT FOR SENIOR RESEARCH  Jennifer Edit 4-14-15(FINAL) ROUGH DRAFT FOR SENIOR RESEARCH  Jennifer Edit 4-14-15
(FINAL) ROUGH DRAFT FOR SENIOR RESEARCH Jennifer Edit 4-14-15
 
Lloyst et al 2015 (nearshore habitat stocked eel)
Lloyst et al 2015 (nearshore habitat stocked eel)Lloyst et al 2015 (nearshore habitat stocked eel)
Lloyst et al 2015 (nearshore habitat stocked eel)
 
THESIS
THESISTHESIS
THESIS
 
Grimaldo2009MCF
Grimaldo2009MCFGrimaldo2009MCF
Grimaldo2009MCF
 
Fossils, Geologic Time, Dating, and Resources
Fossils, Geologic Time, Dating, and ResourcesFossils, Geologic Time, Dating, and Resources
Fossils, Geologic Time, Dating, and Resources
 
23 Benthic Methods Freshwater Sci 2013
23 Benthic Methods Freshwater Sci 201323 Benthic Methods Freshwater Sci 2013
23 Benthic Methods Freshwater Sci 2013
 
RS3608_IWC Vol_14 2014_Cover.pdf-14pp1_14_Hamilton_Lindsay
RS3608_IWC Vol_14 2014_Cover.pdf-14pp1_14_Hamilton_LindsayRS3608_IWC Vol_14 2014_Cover.pdf-14pp1_14_Hamilton_Lindsay
RS3608_IWC Vol_14 2014_Cover.pdf-14pp1_14_Hamilton_Lindsay
 
Why The Coalbed Methane
Why The Coalbed MethaneWhy The Coalbed Methane
Why The Coalbed Methane
 
Grant_Cait_FINAL
Grant_Cait_FINALGrant_Cait_FINAL
Grant_Cait_FINAL
 
Abstract_Findabhair_Ni_Fhaolain
Abstract_Findabhair_Ni_FhaolainAbstract_Findabhair_Ni_Fhaolain
Abstract_Findabhair_Ni_Fhaolain
 
Belize Poster with current and DO temp.pptx
Belize Poster with current and DO temp.pptxBelize Poster with current and DO temp.pptx
Belize Poster with current and DO temp.pptx
 
Joshua Seidman Honors Thesis Rough Draft 2.4 enm
Joshua Seidman Honors Thesis Rough Draft 2.4 enmJoshua Seidman Honors Thesis Rough Draft 2.4 enm
Joshua Seidman Honors Thesis Rough Draft 2.4 enm
 
Marine geology.pptx
Marine geology.pptxMarine geology.pptx
Marine geology.pptx
 
thesis presentation
thesis presentationthesis presentation
thesis presentation
 

Archaeological Research on Food and Community at Weedon Island, FL

  • 1. Archaeological Research on Food and Community at Weedon Island, FL Olajumoke Jegede, Jessica Foster, Kevin Weimer, Christina Perry Sampson Abstract The Weedon Island site in St. Petersburg, Florida is one of the few places with an abundance of archeological information about early Safety Harbor period communities. There is generally a lack of knowledge about community practices, including the organization of subsistence activities, during this time period. This study of excavated material from the Weedon Island site will provide more information about these practices. Specifically, the project's goal is to determine how the already established systems may have been altered by the introduction of other practices from other communities. In addition, this study is questioning how these new practices may have changed the surrounding social and political outlook. An abundance of shell and bone was recovered after conducting a magnetic survey and excavations at multiple areas at the Weedon site. Artifacts, bones, and mollusk shells were excavated, processed and brought to the study’s lab. There, the shells and bones were sorted by species (e.g. lightning whelk, crown conch, etc.), counted, weighed, and bagged for curation. Because this study is an ongoing, the results are preliminary. The results presented here demonstrate variation in the food remains deposited around the site and show how multiple factors contributed to the formation of the site's shell middens. Introduction This research aims to assess the subsistence practices of the people inhabiting the Weedon Island site in Petersburg, Florida on Tampa Bay during the Safety Harbor period. This time period dates between A.D. 1000-1300. During this time period, the region was undergoing a lot of change which could have led to new community organization, new relations with other groups of people outside the area to trade with, and new mounds being built. Since the site is surrounded by water, the community that inhabited the area used a lot of aquatic resources, which we can look at now to help develop patterns leading to conclusions about the site. We are assessing how the community at the time was organized and what their daily life was like. Materials and Methods Samples of shell midden were collected during excavation at the Weedon Island Site in Florida in 2014-2015. Excavations were conducted by trowel in stratigraphic levels of up to 10cm, within excavation units that ranged from 1x1m to 2x2m of area. All excavated material was screened through 1/8” mesh in the field, to remove soils and sediments from the samples. Midden materials as well as larger artifacts were brought back to the lab. The larger artifacts and bone were placed in separate bags to be brushed and washed. The other bags were sorted individually based on location. Smaller shell, bone, clay, etc. were normally in these bags. Shells were sorted by shell type: unidentified large gastropods, unidentified small gastropods, oysters,etc. Bone, seeds, and other non-shell items were separated from the shell in their own categories. The materials were then bagged and weighed and the numbers were put on an excel spreadsheet for later data analysis. Research Questions Did people eat and deposit different types of food at different areas of the site? What factors contributed to the formation of shell midden deposits at the site? Discussion • Safety Harbor people at Weedon Island ate and deposited different proportions of their main food resources at different areas of the site. • Patterns across the site may be due to the way the community was set up or to changes over time. • Because the majority of the areas had the highest quantity of Eastern oyster and only specific areas on the site differed from this pattern, it may be that this was caused by seasonal availability or harvesting in different areas. • Proportions of bone varied possibly due to an event where an abundance of terrestrial foods/fish was preferred. • Midden formation at the site was influenced by multiple factors, including human behavior and the environment. • Patterns in iron concretion vs. bone and barnacles vs. oyster are examples of how midden formations could be influenced by factors other than the behavior of past people. • Iron concretion and barnacles quantities may have been affected by local geology and ecology respectively. For example for iron, by the meat content of deposits. For barnacles, by the water temperature or salinity. Conclusion The lab work and analysis of the data is still being conducted. Right now, it is evident the proportions of different food resources varied around the site. Future research including radiocarbon dating, seasonality analysis, and the analysis of artifacts will offer more information for interpretation of the site. One of the major questions remaining is determining if deposits are contemporaneous with each other or were created over a longer period of time. References Mitchem, Jeffrey M. 2012 Safety Harbor: Mississippian Influence in the Circum- Tampa Bay Region. In Late Prehistoric Florida: Archaeology at the Edge of the Mississippian World, edited by Keith Ashley and Nancy Marie White, pp. 172-185. University Press of Florida, Gainesville. Weisman, Brent R., Jonathon Dean, Matthew O'Brien, and Lori Collins. 2005 Comprehensive Cultural Resource Survey of the Weedon Island Preserve, Pinellas County, Florida. Report on file with University of South Florida. MNI is the minimum number of individual shellfish of a given species. Since both right and left halves of oysters were counted, the MNI is half the total number of oyster valves since each oyster is composed of a left and right side. The proportions of the most common large, edible shellfish remains vary across the site. The Eastern Oyster is the species most common among the different areas. In these areas the MNI is generally greatest of the Eastern Oyster. Site area 4, 5, and Block D and Unit T of site area 3 seem to have followed a different pattern. In those areas the Lightning Whelk is the most prominent species, especially in site are 4 where the MNI of Lightning Whelk is far higher than any other species in any other site. Results Barnacle weight is influenced more by the quantity of oyster than by the total quantity of shell. In the graphs of data of Barnacle weight vs total shell weight and barnacle weight vs oyster weight, the R-squared value is only 0.1775 between barnacle weight vs total shell weight but is 0.3511 between barnacle weight vs oyster weight. This means that barnacle weight and oyster weight have a stronger positive correlation relative to total shell weight. Though this correlation between barnacle weight and oyster weight is stronger than barnacle weight vs total shell weight, neither total shell weight nor oyster weight have a very strong correlation with barnacle weight. The R2 value is very low (0.0033) which indicates a low correlation between the bone and iron by weight. There must be other factors that better explain the variation in iron concretion weight of deposits. The ratio of bone to shell by site area is the highest in Area 1 (0.2) and Area 5 (0.34). Areas 2,3, and 4 have ratios that are a lot lower (more than double) than Areas 1 and 5. By Unit/Block, the bone to shell ratios are the highest in Unit D (0.15) and Unit V (0.34). The rest of the Units/Blocks have ratios that are significantly lower than Unit D and Unit V, with an average around 0.02. For Units A-H, Unit R, and Block D North, the sum of the oyster weight was larger than the sum of all of the large gastropod weight. This was more common in Area 1 than the rest of the Areas. For Unit I, Unit T, Block C, and Unit V the sum of all the large gastropods weight was larger than the sum of the oysters. Ccrested oyster only appear in Unit A, C, I, R, Block D North, and T. When crested oyster did appear there were relatively low amounts compared to eastern oyster MNI. Edible Large Shellfish Distribution Ratio of Bone to Shell by Excavation Unit Eastern Oyster and Crested Oyster MNI Oyster vs Gastropod Shell Weight Ratio of Iron Concretion to Bone Barnacle Weight vs Shell and Oyster Weight Map showing the location of Weedon Island, FL Excavation areas at Weedon Island