SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Management Report Assessment Sheet 2010
Student Name: Nikolina Taylor
Title of Management Report: Recording Disciplinary and Grievance in ESR
Date: 22.06.2010
No Criteria Presented Mark Achieved
1 Identification of and approach to the problem or task with
clearly defined objectives. D M P R
√ M
2 Sources of reference and underpinning data.
D M P R
√ M
3 Information collection and analysis.
D M P R
√ D
4 Conclusion or final outcome.
D M P R
√ M
5 Recommendations.
D M P R
√ D
Overall Management Report Assignment Grade: MERIT
Assessors Comments:
• Clearly addresses the problem and demonstrates ability to understand contextual issues and
the implications of change. A justification of using alternative investigation methods, if the
research was undertaken again was considered i.e.; using a focus group and/or conducting a
telephone survey. The appropriateness of using a pilot scheme, questionnaire layout and the
difficulties that can be experienced with question comprehension could have been considered
more.
• Primary data collection was mainly through questionnaires and one-to-one interviews. 28
questionnaires were distributed to all members of staff in the Workforce Information,
Recruitment, Operational HR and Learning and Development Teams. 18 were completed and
returned, giving a response rate of 64%.
• Secondary research consisted of reviewing the disciplinary and grievance procedures;
various HR textbooks; current CIPD Factsheets: Diversity (Feb 2010) and Discipline and
Grievance at Work (April 2010); CIPD People Management Articles ‘How to Avoid
Uncertainties in the ACAS code’ (March 2010) and various websites were utilised. All
research sources were shown in a good bibliography and reference list.
• An excellent analysis given on primary data sources, shown in the findings section. Most
results from the questionnaire were graphically represented, which enabled you to visually
highlight certain points. One-to-one interviews were also summarised in this section.
Secondary data analysis was reasonably well investigated and clearly identified issues
surrounding disciplinary and grievance in previously published material and in your own
organisation.
• The conclusions were developed logically from the information obtained and addresses most
of the key issues.
• The research undertaken, enabled some good recommendations to be made surrounding
disciplinary and grievance issues within your organisation. The recommendations are
practical and logically developed, that consider implication of implementation i.e.: time and
financial issues were considered. Potential difficulties and there resolution could have been
identified and developed.
Appendices incorporated relevant documentation, which showed that research had been
undertaken. The information included was linked well with the main body of the text. Good
bibliography incorporated but remember: it is a numbered list, in alphabetically order according
to authors SURNAME. The references used were linked in well with the reference list. Overall a
good management report, which was well executed and presented. Well Done.
Assessors Signature: Date: 28.06.2010
Internal Verifiers Comments:
Internal Verifiers Signature: Date: 30.06.2010

More Related Content

What's hot

Kresenda Keith - CV - MAY 2015
Kresenda Keith - CV - MAY 2015Kresenda Keith - CV - MAY 2015
Kresenda Keith - CV - MAY 2015
Kresenda Keith
 
Alternative Views Of Evaluation
Alternative Views Of EvaluationAlternative Views Of Evaluation
Alternative Views Of Evaluation
mandy fontenot
 
A guide for comprehensive needs assessment
A guide for comprehensive needs assessmentA guide for comprehensive needs assessment
A guide for comprehensive needs assessment
k1hinze
 
Form 7 -_project_report_evaluation_form_2012_v1
Form 7 -_project_report_evaluation_form_2012_v1Form 7 -_project_report_evaluation_form_2012_v1
Form 7 -_project_report_evaluation_form_2012_v1
nurulaida92
 

What's hot (17)

BRM -Course Outline 2021-2023 Batch.pdf
BRM -Course Outline 2021-2023 Batch.pdfBRM -Course Outline 2021-2023 Batch.pdf
BRM -Course Outline 2021-2023 Batch.pdf
 
Psyc 355 lab project overview and instructions complete solutions correct ans...
Psyc 355 lab project overview and instructions complete solutions correct ans...Psyc 355 lab project overview and instructions complete solutions correct ans...
Psyc 355 lab project overview and instructions complete solutions correct ans...
 
Kresenda Keith - CV - MAY 2015
Kresenda Keith - CV - MAY 2015Kresenda Keith - CV - MAY 2015
Kresenda Keith - CV - MAY 2015
 
ECER CDP Poster
ECER CDP PosterECER CDP Poster
ECER CDP Poster
 
Good practice in evaluation research
Good practice in evaluation researchGood practice in evaluation research
Good practice in evaluation research
 
Terry PhD Panel PPT (2006)
Terry PhD Panel PPT (2006)Terry PhD Panel PPT (2006)
Terry PhD Panel PPT (2006)
 
Alternative Views Of Evaluation
Alternative Views Of EvaluationAlternative Views Of Evaluation
Alternative Views Of Evaluation
 
Developing a Workplace Health and Safety Action Plan with NVivo
Developing a Workplace Health and Safety Action Plan with NVivoDeveloping a Workplace Health and Safety Action Plan with NVivo
Developing a Workplace Health and Safety Action Plan with NVivo
 
A guide for comprehensive needs assessment
A guide for comprehensive needs assessmentA guide for comprehensive needs assessment
A guide for comprehensive needs assessment
 
Testing your homework 2 solutions...in [1] import numpy as
Testing your homework 2 solutions...in [1] import numpy as Testing your homework 2 solutions...in [1] import numpy as
Testing your homework 2 solutions...in [1] import numpy as
 
1 quantitative research study critiquestudent namewalden
1 quantitative research study critiquestudent namewalden 1 quantitative research study critiquestudent namewalden
1 quantitative research study critiquestudent namewalden
 
Basic steps to program evaluation
Basic steps to program evaluationBasic steps to program evaluation
Basic steps to program evaluation
 
Form 7 -_project_report_evaluation_form_2012_v1
Form 7 -_project_report_evaluation_form_2012_v1Form 7 -_project_report_evaluation_form_2012_v1
Form 7 -_project_report_evaluation_form_2012_v1
 
Thesis defense sample
Thesis defense sampleThesis defense sample
Thesis defense sample
 
Marketing research
Marketing researchMarketing research
Marketing research
 
Needs Assessment
Needs AssessmentNeeds Assessment
Needs Assessment
 
myBskool
myBskoolmyBskool
myBskool
 

Similar to MGT Report Assessment Sheet 2010

Rsi 26 5-solooooooo
Rsi 26 5-soloooooooRsi 26 5-solooooooo
Rsi 26 5-solooooooo
Dilshad Shah
 
32 rcm.org.ukmidwivesTh e latest step-by-step practical g.docx
32 rcm.org.ukmidwivesTh e latest step-by-step practical g.docx32 rcm.org.ukmidwivesTh e latest step-by-step practical g.docx
32 rcm.org.ukmidwivesTh e latest step-by-step practical g.docx
tamicawaysmith
 
Meta Evaluation and Evaluation Dissemination(Manual 3)
Meta Evaluation and Evaluation Dissemination(Manual 3)Meta Evaluation and Evaluation Dissemination(Manual 3)
Meta Evaluation and Evaluation Dissemination(Manual 3)
Dawit Wolde
 
1 HOW TO LAY OUT A RESEARCH PROPOSAL Title Page .docx
1 HOW TO LAY OUT A RESEARCH PROPOSAL  Title Page .docx1 HOW TO LAY OUT A RESEARCH PROPOSAL  Title Page .docx
1 HOW TO LAY OUT A RESEARCH PROPOSAL Title Page .docx
oswald1horne84988
 
· Assignment List· Week 7 - Philosophical EssayWeek 7 - Philos.docx
· Assignment List· Week 7 - Philosophical EssayWeek 7 - Philos.docx· Assignment List· Week 7 - Philosophical EssayWeek 7 - Philos.docx
· Assignment List· Week 7 - Philosophical EssayWeek 7 - Philos.docx
gerardkortney
 
· Assignment List· Week 7 - Philosophical EssayWeek 7 - Philos.docx
· Assignment List· Week 7 - Philosophical EssayWeek 7 - Philos.docx· Assignment List· Week 7 - Philosophical EssayWeek 7 - Philos.docx
· Assignment List· Week 7 - Philosophical EssayWeek 7 - Philos.docx
odiliagilby
 

Similar to MGT Report Assessment Sheet 2010 (20)

Research Writing Methodology
Research Writing MethodologyResearch Writing Methodology
Research Writing Methodology
 
Group4 present3 3-15
Group4 present3 3-15Group4 present3 3-15
Group4 present3 3-15
 
Colloquium Presentation_Ph.D Research Proposal
Colloquium Presentation_Ph.D Research ProposalColloquium Presentation_Ph.D Research Proposal
Colloquium Presentation_Ph.D Research Proposal
 
Writing Research Projects
Writing Research ProjectsWriting Research Projects
Writing Research Projects
 
Writing Research Projects
Writing Research ProjectsWriting Research Projects
Writing Research Projects
 
Part 1 research and evaluation edited
Part 1 research and evaluation editedPart 1 research and evaluation edited
Part 1 research and evaluation edited
 
My research manual
My research manualMy research manual
My research manual
 
Conceptual perspectives on research methods
Conceptual perspectives on research methodsConceptual perspectives on research methods
Conceptual perspectives on research methods
 
Rsi 26 5-solooooooo
Rsi 26 5-soloooooooRsi 26 5-solooooooo
Rsi 26 5-solooooooo
 
Media research
Media researchMedia research
Media research
 
32 rcm.org.ukmidwivesTh e latest step-by-step practical g.docx
32 rcm.org.ukmidwivesTh e latest step-by-step practical g.docx32 rcm.org.ukmidwivesTh e latest step-by-step practical g.docx
32 rcm.org.ukmidwivesTh e latest step-by-step practical g.docx
 
Meta Evaluation and Evaluation Dissemination(Manual 3)
Meta Evaluation and Evaluation Dissemination(Manual 3)Meta Evaluation and Evaluation Dissemination(Manual 3)
Meta Evaluation and Evaluation Dissemination(Manual 3)
 
How_to_Prepare_Research_Proposal.pptx
How_to_Prepare_Research_Proposal.pptxHow_to_Prepare_Research_Proposal.pptx
How_to_Prepare_Research_Proposal.pptx
 
UNIT 4. PPTX writing Research methodology
UNIT 4. PPTX writing Research methodologyUNIT 4. PPTX writing Research methodology
UNIT 4. PPTX writing Research methodology
 
1 HOW TO LAY OUT A RESEARCH PROPOSAL Title Page .docx
1 HOW TO LAY OUT A RESEARCH PROPOSAL  Title Page .docx1 HOW TO LAY OUT A RESEARCH PROPOSAL  Title Page .docx
1 HOW TO LAY OUT A RESEARCH PROPOSAL Title Page .docx
 
· Assignment List· Week 7 - Philosophical EssayWeek 7 - Philos.docx
· Assignment List· Week 7 - Philosophical EssayWeek 7 - Philos.docx· Assignment List· Week 7 - Philosophical EssayWeek 7 - Philos.docx
· Assignment List· Week 7 - Philosophical EssayWeek 7 - Philos.docx
 
· Assignment List· Week 7 - Philosophical EssayWeek 7 - Philos.docx
· Assignment List· Week 7 - Philosophical EssayWeek 7 - Philos.docx· Assignment List· Week 7 - Philosophical EssayWeek 7 - Philos.docx
· Assignment List· Week 7 - Philosophical EssayWeek 7 - Philos.docx
 
2010 Sasta Research Program
2010 Sasta Research Program2010 Sasta Research Program
2010 Sasta Research Program
 
8 - PPT - Action Research - PhD R4 Qualitative Track.pptx
8 - PPT - Action Research - PhD R4 Qualitative Track.pptx8 - PPT - Action Research - PhD R4 Qualitative Track.pptx
8 - PPT - Action Research - PhD R4 Qualitative Track.pptx
 
programme evaluation by priyadarshinee pradhan
programme evaluation by priyadarshinee pradhanprogramme evaluation by priyadarshinee pradhan
programme evaluation by priyadarshinee pradhan
 

MGT Report Assessment Sheet 2010

  • 1. Management Report Assessment Sheet 2010 Student Name: Nikolina Taylor Title of Management Report: Recording Disciplinary and Grievance in ESR Date: 22.06.2010 No Criteria Presented Mark Achieved 1 Identification of and approach to the problem or task with clearly defined objectives. D M P R √ M 2 Sources of reference and underpinning data. D M P R √ M 3 Information collection and analysis. D M P R √ D 4 Conclusion or final outcome. D M P R √ M 5 Recommendations. D M P R √ D Overall Management Report Assignment Grade: MERIT Assessors Comments: • Clearly addresses the problem and demonstrates ability to understand contextual issues and the implications of change. A justification of using alternative investigation methods, if the research was undertaken again was considered i.e.; using a focus group and/or conducting a telephone survey. The appropriateness of using a pilot scheme, questionnaire layout and the difficulties that can be experienced with question comprehension could have been considered more. • Primary data collection was mainly through questionnaires and one-to-one interviews. 28 questionnaires were distributed to all members of staff in the Workforce Information, Recruitment, Operational HR and Learning and Development Teams. 18 were completed and returned, giving a response rate of 64%. • Secondary research consisted of reviewing the disciplinary and grievance procedures; various HR textbooks; current CIPD Factsheets: Diversity (Feb 2010) and Discipline and Grievance at Work (April 2010); CIPD People Management Articles ‘How to Avoid Uncertainties in the ACAS code’ (March 2010) and various websites were utilised. All research sources were shown in a good bibliography and reference list. • An excellent analysis given on primary data sources, shown in the findings section. Most results from the questionnaire were graphically represented, which enabled you to visually highlight certain points. One-to-one interviews were also summarised in this section. Secondary data analysis was reasonably well investigated and clearly identified issues surrounding disciplinary and grievance in previously published material and in your own organisation. • The conclusions were developed logically from the information obtained and addresses most of the key issues. • The research undertaken, enabled some good recommendations to be made surrounding disciplinary and grievance issues within your organisation. The recommendations are practical and logically developed, that consider implication of implementation i.e.: time and financial issues were considered. Potential difficulties and there resolution could have been identified and developed. Appendices incorporated relevant documentation, which showed that research had been undertaken. The information included was linked well with the main body of the text. Good bibliography incorporated but remember: it is a numbered list, in alphabetically order according to authors SURNAME. The references used were linked in well with the reference list. Overall a good management report, which was well executed and presented. Well Done. Assessors Signature: Date: 28.06.2010 Internal Verifiers Comments:
  • 2. Internal Verifiers Signature: Date: 30.06.2010