Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

ATN after vetting comments.docx

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Loading in …3
×

Check these out next

1 of 2 Ad

More Related Content

Similar to ATN after vetting comments.docx (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Advertisement

ATN after vetting comments.docx

  1. 1. Para No. Commissio nerate Name of the Unit M/s Ministry's Further comments Vetting comments of O/o PDA (C), Bangalore 14.9.3 Bangalore-I Motor Industries Co. Ltd. Sl. No. Name of the assessee Period covered Amount (Rs.) OIO No. Remarks 1 M/s Motor Industries Co. Ltd. 16.8.02 to 31.3.03 62,39,114/- 275/04 dt. 14.9.04 Review SCN is yet to be issued Final outcome awaited 2 M/s Motor Industries Co. Ltd. 7.7.97 to 15.8.02 4,94,26,122/- 276/04 dt. 14.9.04 SCN was issued to the service receiver in India. The case has been dropped and there is no legal ground to issue any SCN as there is no tax liability on the service receiver in India prior to 16.8.02 Service Tax on Import of Services came into existence from 16.08.02. The objection was prior to that so the reply of the Ministry is acceptable. Para is proposed for closure. 3 M/s Motor Industries Co. Ltd. 1.4.03 to 30.12.03 47,74,659/- 30/04 dt. 16.6.04 The order-in-original covers the entire period. However, since the assessee had paid R & D Cess to the extent of Rs. 45,47,294/- the balance amount of Rs. 2,27,365 was confirmed alongwith interest and imposition of penalty. Reply of the Ministry is acceptable. Para is proposed for closure. 14.12 Bangalore Zone Aravind Fashions Ltd. SCN No. IV/09/301/0 4 ST Adjn. Dt. 28.6.04 On scrutiny of the records, it is found that there is no legal ground to issue any review SCN for the following reasons:- 1) SCN was issued to the service receiver. The issue relates to activity of licensing of technical know how, which would be classifiable under services viz. Intellectual Property Services, which came into effect from 10.9.04 2) Since SCN had been issued to the service provider prior to 16.8.02, the service receiver M/s Aravind Fashions is not liable for payment of Service Tax for the period prior to 16.8.02 3) Since it is a case of transfer of technology and payment of royalty for manufacture of goods, falling under Intellectual Property Services (w.e.f. 10.9.04), the case was dropped Service Tax on Intellectual Property Services came into existence from 10.9.04. The objection was prior to that so the reply of the Ministry is acceptable. Para is proposed for closure.
  2. 2. Dy. Director/RA-Central Aravind Fashions Ltd. OIO No. 299/04 dt. 24.9.04 Though it was reported earlier that the review SCN is under process, on scrutiny of records, it is reported that there is no legal ground to issue any review SCN for the reason that it is a case of transfer of technology and payment of royalty for manufacture of goods. Such activity would not come within the purview of Consulting Engineer Services, but Intellectual Property Services (w.e.f. 10.9.04) Service Tax on Intellectual Property Services came into existence from 10.9.04. The objection was prior to that so the reply of the Ministry is acceptable. Para is proposed for closure. Banner Pharma Caps India Ltd. On scrutiny of records, it is found that there is no legal ground to issue any review SCN for the following reasons:- i) SCN was issued to the service receiver. The case is not a sale of technical knowhow, but only licencing thereof and the amount paid was the royalty of the manufacture of goods. Such activity would not come under the perview of Consulting Engineer Services ii) Prior to 16.8.02, foreign service provider was liable for payment of service tax. Service Tax on Import of Services came into existence from 16.08.02. The objection was prior to that so the reply of the Ministry is acceptable. Para is proposed for closure. Bio-Con India Ltd. Review SCN is being issued Finality of Adjudication of SCN is awaited. L & T, Komatsu SCN was issued to M/s Komatsu, Japan and not to M/s L & T Komatsu (Indian Co.). On scrutiny of records, it is reported that there is no legal ground to issue any review SCN for the following reasons:- i) Service rendered outside India will not be liable to Service Tax, which has been clarified by circular 36/04/2001 dt. 8.10.01. Further, the notice being a foreign service provider, the Board is examining the issue of notification under Sec. 11C for waiver of tax liability. Decision of the Board to issue notification for waiver of tax liability u/s 11C is awaited Goetze India Ltd. Appeal against OIA 193/04 dated 15.12.04 pending in CESTAT Final outcome of the appeal pending at CESTAT is awaited Kirloskar Electric Co. It has been reported that the said Service charges, were in the nature of reimbursement of travel expenses towards deputation of assessee's personnel to site and hence do not fall under the category of Consulting Engineer and therefore does not attract Service Tax Reply of the Ministry is acceptable. Para is proposed for closure. Kirlosker Batteries No further comments desired ------

×