This document summarizes a presentation on clinical care quality and its relationship to surgical disparities. It discusses how differences in healthcare structure (e.g. location, volume) and process (e.g. choice of procedure) are associated with racial disparities in surgical outcomes. It identifies gaps in understanding the causes of these differences and effective remedies. Future research should evaluate strategies to address differences in structure and process in order to reduce disparities in outcomes and improve surgical value.
Call Girls Nagpur Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Peter Najjar: Clinical Care and Quality Overview
1. CENTER FOR SURGERY
AND PUBLIC HEALTH
Clinical Care and Quality:
Relationships with Surgical
Disparities
Peter A. Najjar, M.D.
Harvard Medical School Fellow in Patient Safety and Quality
Arthur Tracy Cabot Fellow in Health Services Research
Center for Surgery and Public Health
Brigham and Women’s Hospital
N I H - A C S S Y M P O S I U M O N S U R G I C A L D I S PA R I T I E S R E S E A R C H
2. CENTER FOR SURGERY
AND PUBLIC HEALTH
Healthcare Quality Framework1
• Context of care
delivery.
• Easy to measure.
Structure
• Acts of healthcare
delivery.
• Harder to measure
(opacity).
Process • Effects of care
delivered.
• Harder to measure
(risk adjustment).
• Value = Quality/Cost2
Outcome
“The degree to which health services for individuals and populations increase the
likelihood of desired health outcomes and are consistent with current professional
knowledge.” –Institute of Medicine
3. CENTER FOR SURGERY
AND PUBLIC HEALTH
Importance to Disparities
Are there interventions that can reduce:
-the causes of structural differences associated with race?
-the impact of structural differences associated with race?
-the causes of associations between process and race?
What impact on value would such interventions have?
Structure Process Outcome
4. CENTER FOR SURGERY
AND PUBLIC HEALTH
Known Associations with Disparities
Structure
Volume.3-14,16
Location.10-12,15-17
Quality
Infrastructure.18-19
Specialty
Certification.20-21
Process
Choice of
Procedure.14,17,22-27
Prophylaxis.19
Referral
Patterns.4,15
Outcome
Mortality.5,7,9,13,28-36
Complications.
3,23,31,33-34,37-38
Length of
Stay.3,18,36,39
Discharge.7
Readmission.40-
42
5. CENTER FOR SURGERY
AND PUBLIC HEALTH
Gaps in the Literature
What are the differences in process that may drive disparities
in outcomes?
What might be responsible for those differences in process?
What role do structural considerations play?
What are effective remedies to structural and process
differences?
If structural and process differences are remedied, do
disparities in outcomes decrease?
What impact on surgical value would such decreases have?
6. CENTER FOR SURGERY
AND PUBLIC HEALTH
Future Directions
IOM Approach: To Err is Human (1999) and Crossing the
Quality Chasm (2001)
Further surgical disparities research in the quality arena
should be aimed at:
• Reforming health professions education.
• Redesigning care delivery.
• Encouraging information technology implementation.
• Learning from systems demonstrations.
• Furthering measurement and informed purchasing.
7. CENTER FOR SURGERY
AND PUBLIC HEALTH
Conclusions
The outcomes of surgical care are dictated by the structure
and process of care delivery.
When differences in structure and process are associated with
race, disparities in outcomes follow.
Addressing gaps in our understanding and evaluating
strategies to alleviate these differences is critical to reducing
disparities in surgical outcomes.
“The evidence is compelling. Millions of Americans are not
reached by proven effective interventions that can save lives
and prevent disability.”43
8. CENTER FOR SURGERY
AND PUBLIC HEALTH
1. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966.
Milbank Q. 2005;83(4):691-729.
2. Porter ME. What is value in health care? N. Engl. J. Med.
2010;363(26):2477-2481.
3. Hauch A, Al-Qurayshi Z, Friedlander P, Kandil E. Association of
socioeconomic status, race, and ethnicity with outcomes of patients
undergoing thyroid surgery. JAMA Otolaryngol.-- Head Neck Surg.
2014;140(12):1173-1183.
4. Chang DC, Zhang Y, Mukherjee D, et al. Variations in referral
patterns to high-volume centers for pancreatic cancer. J. Am. Coll.
Surg. 2009;209(6):720-726.
5. Epstein AJ, Gray BH, Schlesinger M. Racial and ethnic
differences in the use of high-volume hospitals and surgeons. Arch.
Surg. Chic. Ill 1960 2010;145(2):179-186.
6. Stitzenberg KB, Meropol NJ. Trends in centralization of cancer
surgery. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2010;17(11):2824-2831.
7. Curry WT, Carter BS, Barker FG. Racial, ethnic, and
socioeconomic disparities in patient outcomes after craniotomy for
tumor in adult patients in the United States, 1988-2004.
Neurosurgery 2010;66(3):427-437; discussion 437-438.
8. Aranda MA, McGory M, Sekeris E, Maggard M, Ko C, Zingmond
DS. Do racial/ethnic disparities exist in the utilization of high-volume
surgeons for women with ovarian cancer? Gynecol. Oncol.
2008;111(2):166-172.
9. Osborne NH, Upchurch GR, Mathur AK, Dimick JB. Explaining
racial disparities in mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm
repair. J. Vasc. Surg. 2009;50(4):709-713.
10. Boyd LR, Novetsky AP, Curtin JP. Ovarian cancer care for the
underserved: are surgical patterns of care different in a public
hospital setting? Cancer 2011;117(4):777-783.
11. Bao Y, Kamble S. Geographical distribution of surgical
capabilities and disparities in the use of high-volume providers: the
case of coronary artery bypass graft. Med. Care 2009;47(7):794-802.
12. SooHoo NF, Farng E, Zingmond DS. Disparities in the utilization
of high-volume hospitals for total hip replacement. J. Natl. Med.
Assoc. 2011;103(1):31-35.
13. Arnaoutakis DJ, Propper BW, Black JH, et al. Racial and ethnic
disparities in the treatment of unruptured thoracoabdominal aortic
aneurysms in the United States. J. Surg. Res. 2013;184(1):651-657.
14. Barocas DA, Alvarez J, Koyama T, et al. Racial variation in the
quality of surgical care for bladder cancer. Cancer 2014;120(7):1018-
1025.
15. Sun M, Karakiewicz PI, Sammon JD, et al. Disparities in selective
referral for cancer surgeries: implications for the current healthcare
delivery system. BMJ Open 2014;4(3):e003921.
16. Bristow RE, Chang J, Ziogas A, Randall LM, Anton-Culver H.
High-volume ovarian cancer care: survival impact and disparities in
access for advanced-stage disease. Gynecol. Oncol. 2014;132(2):403-
410.
17. Martinez SR, Shah DR, Maverakis E, Yang AD. Geographic
Variation in Utilization of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for
Intermediate Thickness Cutaneous Melanoma. J. Surg. Oncol.
2012;106(7):807-810.
18. Parsons HM, Habermann EB, Stain SC, Vickers SM, Al-Refaie
WB. What happens to racial and ethnic minorities after cancer
surgery at American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality
Improvement Program hospitals? J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2012;214(4):539-
547; discussion 547-549.
19. Lau BD, Haider AH, Streiff MB, et al. Eliminating Health Care
Disparities With Mandatory Clinical Decision Support: The Venous
Thromboembolism (VTE) Example. Med. Care 2015;53(1):18-24.
20. Petrosyan M, Guner YS, Emami CN, Ford HR. Disparities in the
delivery of pediatric trauma care. J. Trauma 2009;67(2 Suppl):S114-
119.
21. Armstrong K, Randall TC, Polsky D, Moye E, Silber JH. Racial
differences in surgeons and hospitals for endometrial cancer
treatment. Med. Care 2011;49(2):207-214.
22. Francis ML. Rural-Urban Differences in Surgical Procedures for
Medicare Beneficiaries. Arch. Surg. 2011;146(5):579.
23. Murphy EH, Stanley GA, Arko MZ, Davis CM, Modrall JG, Arko
FR. Effect of ethnicity and insurance type on the outcome of open
thoracic aortic aneurysm repair. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2013;27(6):699-
707.
24. Hughes K, Boyd C, Oyetunji T, et al. Racial/Ethnic disparities in
revascularization for limb salvage: an analysis of the National
Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Vasc.
Endovascular Surg. 2014;48(5-6):402-405.
25. Liu FW, Randall LM, Tewari KS, Bristow RE. Racial disparities and
patterns of ovarian cancer surgical care in California. Gynecol.
Oncol. 2014;132(1):221-226.
26. Henry AJ, Hevelone ND, Belkin M, Nguyen LL. Socioeconomic
and hospital-related predictors of amputation for critical limb
ischemia. J. Vasc. Surg. 2011;53(2):330-339.e1.
27. Durazzo TS, Frencher S, Gusberg R. Influence of race on the
management of lower extremity ischemia: revascularization vs
amputation. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(7):617-623.
28. Kim DH, Daskalakis C, Lee AN, et al. Racial disparity in the
relationship between hospital volume and mortality among patients
undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann. Surg.
2008;248(5):886-892.
29. Breslin TM, Morris AM, Gu N, et al. Hospital factors and racial
disparities in mortality after surgery for breast and colon cancer. J.
Clin. Oncol. Off. J. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 2009;27(24):3945-3950.
30. Haider AH, Hashmi ZG, Zafar SN, et al. Minority trauma patients
tend to cluster at trauma centers with worse-than-expected
mortality: can this phenomenon help explain racial disparities in
trauma outcomes? Ann. Surg. 2013;258(4):572-579; discussion 579-
581.
31. Reames BN, Birkmeyer NJO, Dimick JB, Ghaferi AA.
Socioeconomic disparities in mortality after cancer surgery: failure
to rescue. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(5):475-481.
32. Hicks CW, Hashmi ZG, Hui X, et al. Explaining the Paradoxical
Age-Based Racial Disparities in Survival After Trauma: The Role of
the Treating Facility. Ann. Surg. 2014.
33. Rangrass G, Ghaferi AA, Dimick JB. Explaining racial disparities
in outcomes after cardiac surgery: the role of hospital quality. JAMA
Surg. 2014;149(3):223-227.
34. Skolasky RL, Thorpe RJ, Wegener ST, Riley LH. Complications
and mortality in cervical spine surgery: racial differences. Spine
2014;39(18):1506-1512.
35. Nguyen GC, Patel AM. Racial disparities in mortality in patients
undergoing bariatric surgery in the U.S.A. Obes. Surg.
2013;23(10):1508-1514.
36. Schneider EB, Calkins KL, Weiss MJ, et al. Race-based
differences in length of stay among patients undergoing
pancreatoduodenectomy. Surgery 2014;156(3):528-537.
37. Vogel TR, Dombrovskiy VY, Carson JL, Haser PB, Lowry SF,
Graham AM. Infectious complications after elective vascular surgical
procedures. J. Vasc. Surg. 2010;51(1):122-129; discussion 129-130.
38. Creanga AA, Bateman BT, Mhyre JM, Kuklina E, Shilkrut A,
Callaghan WM. Performance of racial and ethnic minority-serving
hospitals on delivery-related indicators. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.
2014;211(6):647.e1-16.
39. Walker CT, Stone JJ, Jain M, Jacobson M, Phillips V, Silberstein
HJ. The effects of socioeconomic status and race on pediatric
neurosurgical shunting. Childs Nerv. Syst. ChNS Off. J. Int. Soc.
Pediatr. Neurosurg. 2014;30(1):117-122.
40. Tsai TC, Orav EJ, Joynt KE. Disparities in surgical 30-day
readmission rates for Medicare beneficiaries by race and site of
care. Ann. Surg. 2014;259(6):1086-1090.
41. Singh JA, Lu X, Rosenthal GE, Ibrahim S, Cram P. Racial
disparities in knee and hip total joint arthroplasty: an 18-year
analysis of national Medicare data. Ann. Rheum. Dis.
2014;73(12):2107-2115.
42. Girotti ME, Shih T, Revels S, Dimick JB. Racial disparities in
readmissions and site of care for major surgery. J. Am. Coll. Surg.
2014;218(3):423-430.
43. Institute of Medicine (US) National Roundtable on Health Care
Quality; Donaldson MS, editor. Statement on Quality of Care.
Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 1998. The Urgent
Need to Improve Health Care Quality: Consensus
Statement. Available from:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK223995/
References
Editor's Notes
Donabedian model for measuring healthcare quality, detecting deficits, and characterizing opportunities for improvement. Structure and Process interact to determine Outcome. Disparities have been detected across all three domains in multiple surgical specialties.
Evidence to suggest that, broadly, across-hospital differences (as opposed to within-hospital) may explain a significant portion (perhaps up to 50%) of disparities and that, accordingly, higher quality hospitals/care may reduce disparities. The mechanisms (process) through which these findings are mediated are less clear.
Much work has been done to investigate outcome disparities, whereas structure and process interact to create outcomes and are more readily addressable. Structural and process based factors are modifiable, and evidence of improvement in outcomes disparities from those modifications is included.