To help you choose the strategy that is most successful and satisfy your requirements, let's compare RPO and staff augmentation. Article link: https://www.mindbowser.com/rpo-vs-staff-augmentation/

1. Understanding The Difference
Between RPO And Staff
Augmentation
www.mindbowser.com contact@mindbowser.com

2. 1. Introduction
2. What Is RPO?
3. Staff Augmentation
4. Staff Augmentation Or Hiring A Temp
5. RPO vs. Staff Augmentation
6. Staff Augmentation Can Be A Stepping
Stone To RPO Solutions
7. Conclusion
Architecture for MVP

3. Introduction
When a software firm or corporate IT department
needs to cut personnel costs, accelerate project
timeline or push beyond the scope of in-house
resources, they often opt for technical staffing
services. There are a variety of staffing models of
outsourcing, such as IT Staff augmentation, project
outsourcing or managed services that bring required
talents in-house.

4.  The RPO services allow you to pay for a
specific, prearranged function and share the
burden of risk with outsourcing vendors.
 RPO works under contracts that last for a
particular period and involves a customized
solution consisting of personnel and technology.
 RPO service providers create a long-term
partnership with the clients, maintaining the
required constant and dedicated delivery of
resources.
What Is RPO?

5. Staff Augmentation

6. Staff Augmentation
Staff augmentation differs from RPO or project outsourcing in several ways.
One of the efficient ways to do this is to keep costs low and maintain access to
top-notch IT talents when required.
Staff augmentation temporarily boosts the IT team with capable talents
throughout the project or for a specific duration.

7. Staff Augmentation Or Hiring A Temp
 The basic difference is staff augmentation includes the deployment of a
permanent employee from the recruitment bench.
 In the case of a temporary team member, the personnel will be somebody
hired from the marketplace and subject to the chances of obtaining a risk.
Staff augmentation and temporary staffing have their methods of
execution which define the benefits of each.
 The best solution here can be chosen according to the firm’s risk-bearing
capacity.

8. RPO vs. Staff Augmentation
 The major difference between RPO and staff augmentation is how
employees are hired.
 Staff augmentation hires the resources while maintaining direct control
of the team, while RPO pays for a specific outcome and shares the
burden of risk with the vendor.
 RPO services are always chosen for long-term partnerships with clients,
while staff augmentations are a suitable solution for quick staffing for a
specific duration.
 Companies prefer staff augmentation due to its flexibility in the
recruitment process.

9. Staff Augmentation Can Be A Stepping Stone To
RPO Solutions
 While both the models are certainly different, staff augmentation is often
preferred as an insightful way to introduce the value of recruitment
outsourcing.
 After understanding the value and strategic orientation of an RPO
provider, many businesses began to understand the benefit of long-term
outsourcing models and how they can add value to the business.
 RPO services truly help as a strategic and capable solution to such
problems that are difficult to solve by a single recruiter.

10. CONCLUSION
Choosing the right delivery model can be a complex process. You might choose staff augmentation
or RPO in your general staffing approach according to your software development needs. The best
way would be to select an experienced vendor to help meet your challenges and implement the
model to bring efficiency to the company.
Mindbowser analyzes your staffing challenges and needs to help you choose the best delivery
model. You will have skilled experts that bring productivity and efficiency to the project and the
company.

11. THANK YOU
www.mindbowser.com contact@mindbowser.com