Submit Search
Upload
General Electric.docx
•
Download as DOCX, PDF
•
0 likes
•
7 views
M
MinakshiXP23010
Follow
Engineering
Read less
Read more
Engineering
Report
Share
Report
Share
1 of 4
Download now
Recommended
Michael carla memo#3
Michael carla memo#3
Carla Michael
Michael carla memo#3
Michael carla memo#3
Carla Michael
✍️
General Electric ( Ge )
General Electric ( Ge )
Brianna Johnson
1. Explain the four characteristics of B-DNA structure? Differentiate between the A-DNA and Z-DNA structural features? 2. Describe the supercoiled DNA with its properties and how naturally occurring DNA under wound? 3. What are topoisomerases? Explain the two types of topoisomerases with their mechanism of action? 4. Explain the three interactions that are required to stabilize nucleic acids? How DNA denatures and renatures? 5. What are ribozymes and explain their properties? Case 20 Restructuring General Electric The appointment of Larry Culp as the chairman and CEO of the General Electric Company (GE) on October 1st, 2018 was a clear indication of the seriousness of the problems that had engulfed the company. Culp, the former CEO of the highly-successful conglomerate, Danaher Corporation, had been appointed a GE director only six months previously and was the first outsider to lead GE—every one of GE’s previous CEOs had been a career manager at the company. On the same day as Culp’s appointment, GE abandoned its earning guidance for the year and announced a $23 billion accounting charge arising from a write-down of goodwill at its troubled electrical power division.1 Culp’s predecessor, John Flannery had been CEO for a mere 14 months—a sharp contrast to GE’s two previous CEOs: Jeff Immelt (16 years) and Jack Welch (20 years). Flannery’s tenure at GE has coincided with of the company’s most difficult periods in its entire 126-year history. In November 2017, amidst deteriorating financial performance, Flannery announced a halving of GE’s quarterly dividend, the proposed sale of its lighting and locomotive units—two of GE’s oldest businesses—and the elimination of 12,000 jobs in the power division. In 2018, the situation worsened. In January, GE announced that it would be paying $15 bn. to cover liabilities at insurance companies it had sold 12 years previously. In February, GE confirmed suspicions over its dubious accounting practices by restating its revenues and earnings for the previous two years, while also announcing the likelihood of legal claims arising from its its subprime mortgage lending over a decade earlier. The outcome was a precipitous fall in GE’s share price (see Figure 1) that culminated in GE’s dismissal from the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA). Until June 2018, GE was the sole surviving member of the DJIA when it was created in 1896. The crisis at GE presented the board with two central questions. First, should GE be broken up? Second, if GE was to continue as a widely-diversified company, how should it be managed? As a diversified corporation that extended from jet engines, to oil and gas equipment, to healthcare products, to financial services, GE was an anomaly. For three decades, con- glomerates—diversified companies comprising unrelated or loosely related businesses— had been deeply unfashionable. CEOs, Jack Welch and Jeff Immelt, had claimed that, by virtue of its integrated m ...
1. Explain the four characteristics of B-DNA structure Differenti
1. Explain the four characteristics of B-DNA structure Differenti
MartineMccracken314
1. Explain the four characteristics of B-DNA structure? Differentiate between the A-DNA and Z-DNA structural features? 2. Describe the supercoiled DNA with its properties and how naturally occurring DNA under wound? 3. What are topoisomerases? Explain the two types of topoisomerases with their mechanism of action? 4. Explain the three interactions that are required to stabilize nucleic acids? How DNA denatures and renatures? 5. What are ribozymes and explain their properties? Case 20 Restructuring General Electric The appointment of Larry Culp as the chairman and CEO of the General Electric Company (GE) on October 1st, 2018 was a clear indication of the seriousness of the problems that had engulfed the company. Culp, the former CEO of the highly-successful conglomerate, Danaher Corporation, had been appointed a GE director only six months previously and was the first outsider to lead GE—every one of GE’s previous CEOs had been a career manager at the company. On the same day as Culp’s appointment, GE abandoned its earning guidance for the year and announced a $23 billion accounting charge arising from a write-down of goodwill at its troubled electrical power division.1 Culp’s predecessor, John Flannery had been CEO for a mere 14 months—a sharp contrast to GE’s two previous CEOs: Jeff Immelt (16 years) and Jack Welch (20 years). Flannery’s tenure at GE has coincided with of the company’s most difficult periods in its entire 126-year history. In November 2017, amidst deteriorating financial performance, Flannery announced a halving of GE’s quarterly dividend, the proposed sale of its lighting and locomotive units—two of GE’s oldest businesses—and the elimination of 12,000 jobs in the power division. In 2018, the situation worsened. In January, GE announced that it would be paying $15 bn. to cover liabilities at insurance companies it had sold 12 years previously. In February, GE confirmed suspicions over its dubious accounting practices by restating its revenues and earnings for the previous two years, while also announcing the likelihood of legal claims arising from its its subprime mortgage lending over a decade earlier. The outcome was a precipitous fall in GE’s share price (see Figure 1) that culminated in GE’s dismissal from the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA). Until June 2018, GE was the sole surviving member of the DJIA when it was created in 1896. The crisis at GE presented the board with two central questions. First, should GE be broken up? Second, if GE was to continue as a widely-diversified company, how should it be managed? As a diversified corporation that extended from jet engines, to oil and gas equipment, to healthcare products, to financial services, GE was an anomaly. For three decades, con- glomerates—diversified companies comprising unrelated or loosely related businesses— had been deeply unfashionable. CEOs, Jack Welch and Jeff Immelt, had claimed that, by virtue of its integrated m ...
1. Explain the four characteristics of B-DNA structure Differenti
1. Explain the four characteristics of B-DNA structure Differenti
AbbyWhyte974
Despite having lots of problems, GE is still a company that is central to the US economy and US technology. Is now the time to invest in GE?
Is Now the Time to Invest in GE?
Is Now the Time to Invest in GE?
InvestingTips
CASE 29 General Electric, GE Capital and the Financial Crisis of 2008: The Best of the Worst in the Financial Sector? CASE 32 General Electric, GE Capital and the Financial Crisis of 2008: The Best of the Worst in the Financial Sector? VII. DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 1. Should GE eliminate GE Capital? 2. Should GE focus only on Industrial Products? 3. Should GE simply reduce the role of GE Capital? 4. What Lessons were learned from the Financial Crisis? 5. Should GE continue to increase its dividend or pursue non financial acquisitions? 6. Was the financial crisis a “blessing in disguise” for GE? PAGE 29-2 Copyright ©2015 Pearson Education, Inc. Company BackgroundFor more than a century, General Electric (GE), has been a global leader and iconic brand known for innovation and leadership in a wide range of endeavors. Its diver-sified portfolio of products is organized into four strategic business units: energy, technology infrastructure, GE Capital, and home and business solutions.GE began in 1878 when Thomas Edison formed the Edison General Electric Company (EGEC). Though Edison was best known for inventing the first incan-descent light bulb, he also pioneered systems design for generating and distributing electricity, eventually holding over 1000 patents. Within a few years, the rival Thomas Houston Company, which held key patents in the same area, challenged EGEC’s posi-tion in the marketplace. In 1892, the two companies merged, forming General Electric. GE then parlayed the demand for electricity into the invention of home heating, stoves and other appliances, and refrigeration, transforming American households, and went on to become an innovator in myriad fields, from medicine, aviation, and transportation to plastics and financial services. GE created the GE Credit Corporation (later GE Capi-tal) in the wake of the Great Depression to facilitate the sale of household appliances and provide the option of extended payments for consumers. Innovation defined the organization, and the commitment to research and development remained key.1 GE was one of the original 12 companies that formed the Dow Jones Industrial Average, and the only one of those companies that was still part of the DJIA in 2012. GE was also recognized for cultivating leaders such as Charles Wilson, Ralph Cordiner, Fred Borch, Reginald Jones, and John Welch.2 In the early 1970s under Fred Borch, GE was one of the first companies with a diversified infrastructure to formalize strategic planning at both corporate and business unit levels with its creation of strategic busi-ness units.3GE always saw itself as striving to create a world that worked better, “making what few in the world can, but everyone needs.”4 The company’s strategic philosophy centered on innovation, superior technology, and demonstrating leadership in growth markets. GE sought to maintain a strong competitive advantage through innovation, smart capital allocation, and solidifying customer re ...
CASE 29General Electric, GE Capital and the Financial Crisis
CASE 29General Electric, GE Capital and the Financial Crisis
TawnaDelatorrejs
✍️
The Drive Is A Trait Described By Kirkpatrick And Locke
The Drive Is A Trait Described By Kirkpatrick And Locke
Karen Oliver
Recommended
Michael carla memo#3
Michael carla memo#3
Carla Michael
Michael carla memo#3
Michael carla memo#3
Carla Michael
✍️
General Electric ( Ge )
General Electric ( Ge )
Brianna Johnson
1. Explain the four characteristics of B-DNA structure? Differentiate between the A-DNA and Z-DNA structural features? 2. Describe the supercoiled DNA with its properties and how naturally occurring DNA under wound? 3. What are topoisomerases? Explain the two types of topoisomerases with their mechanism of action? 4. Explain the three interactions that are required to stabilize nucleic acids? How DNA denatures and renatures? 5. What are ribozymes and explain their properties? Case 20 Restructuring General Electric The appointment of Larry Culp as the chairman and CEO of the General Electric Company (GE) on October 1st, 2018 was a clear indication of the seriousness of the problems that had engulfed the company. Culp, the former CEO of the highly-successful conglomerate, Danaher Corporation, had been appointed a GE director only six months previously and was the first outsider to lead GE—every one of GE’s previous CEOs had been a career manager at the company. On the same day as Culp’s appointment, GE abandoned its earning guidance for the year and announced a $23 billion accounting charge arising from a write-down of goodwill at its troubled electrical power division.1 Culp’s predecessor, John Flannery had been CEO for a mere 14 months—a sharp contrast to GE’s two previous CEOs: Jeff Immelt (16 years) and Jack Welch (20 years). Flannery’s tenure at GE has coincided with of the company’s most difficult periods in its entire 126-year history. In November 2017, amidst deteriorating financial performance, Flannery announced a halving of GE’s quarterly dividend, the proposed sale of its lighting and locomotive units—two of GE’s oldest businesses—and the elimination of 12,000 jobs in the power division. In 2018, the situation worsened. In January, GE announced that it would be paying $15 bn. to cover liabilities at insurance companies it had sold 12 years previously. In February, GE confirmed suspicions over its dubious accounting practices by restating its revenues and earnings for the previous two years, while also announcing the likelihood of legal claims arising from its its subprime mortgage lending over a decade earlier. The outcome was a precipitous fall in GE’s share price (see Figure 1) that culminated in GE’s dismissal from the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA). Until June 2018, GE was the sole surviving member of the DJIA when it was created in 1896. The crisis at GE presented the board with two central questions. First, should GE be broken up? Second, if GE was to continue as a widely-diversified company, how should it be managed? As a diversified corporation that extended from jet engines, to oil and gas equipment, to healthcare products, to financial services, GE was an anomaly. For three decades, con- glomerates—diversified companies comprising unrelated or loosely related businesses— had been deeply unfashionable. CEOs, Jack Welch and Jeff Immelt, had claimed that, by virtue of its integrated m ...
1. Explain the four characteristics of B-DNA structure Differenti
1. Explain the four characteristics of B-DNA structure Differenti
MartineMccracken314
1. Explain the four characteristics of B-DNA structure? Differentiate between the A-DNA and Z-DNA structural features? 2. Describe the supercoiled DNA with its properties and how naturally occurring DNA under wound? 3. What are topoisomerases? Explain the two types of topoisomerases with their mechanism of action? 4. Explain the three interactions that are required to stabilize nucleic acids? How DNA denatures and renatures? 5. What are ribozymes and explain their properties? Case 20 Restructuring General Electric The appointment of Larry Culp as the chairman and CEO of the General Electric Company (GE) on October 1st, 2018 was a clear indication of the seriousness of the problems that had engulfed the company. Culp, the former CEO of the highly-successful conglomerate, Danaher Corporation, had been appointed a GE director only six months previously and was the first outsider to lead GE—every one of GE’s previous CEOs had been a career manager at the company. On the same day as Culp’s appointment, GE abandoned its earning guidance for the year and announced a $23 billion accounting charge arising from a write-down of goodwill at its troubled electrical power division.1 Culp’s predecessor, John Flannery had been CEO for a mere 14 months—a sharp contrast to GE’s two previous CEOs: Jeff Immelt (16 years) and Jack Welch (20 years). Flannery’s tenure at GE has coincided with of the company’s most difficult periods in its entire 126-year history. In November 2017, amidst deteriorating financial performance, Flannery announced a halving of GE’s quarterly dividend, the proposed sale of its lighting and locomotive units—two of GE’s oldest businesses—and the elimination of 12,000 jobs in the power division. In 2018, the situation worsened. In January, GE announced that it would be paying $15 bn. to cover liabilities at insurance companies it had sold 12 years previously. In February, GE confirmed suspicions over its dubious accounting practices by restating its revenues and earnings for the previous two years, while also announcing the likelihood of legal claims arising from its its subprime mortgage lending over a decade earlier. The outcome was a precipitous fall in GE’s share price (see Figure 1) that culminated in GE’s dismissal from the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA). Until June 2018, GE was the sole surviving member of the DJIA when it was created in 1896. The crisis at GE presented the board with two central questions. First, should GE be broken up? Second, if GE was to continue as a widely-diversified company, how should it be managed? As a diversified corporation that extended from jet engines, to oil and gas equipment, to healthcare products, to financial services, GE was an anomaly. For three decades, con- glomerates—diversified companies comprising unrelated or loosely related businesses— had been deeply unfashionable. CEOs, Jack Welch and Jeff Immelt, had claimed that, by virtue of its integrated m ...
1. Explain the four characteristics of B-DNA structure Differenti
1. Explain the four characteristics of B-DNA structure Differenti
AbbyWhyte974
Despite having lots of problems, GE is still a company that is central to the US economy and US technology. Is now the time to invest in GE?
Is Now the Time to Invest in GE?
Is Now the Time to Invest in GE?
InvestingTips
CASE 29 General Electric, GE Capital and the Financial Crisis of 2008: The Best of the Worst in the Financial Sector? CASE 32 General Electric, GE Capital and the Financial Crisis of 2008: The Best of the Worst in the Financial Sector? VII. DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 1. Should GE eliminate GE Capital? 2. Should GE focus only on Industrial Products? 3. Should GE simply reduce the role of GE Capital? 4. What Lessons were learned from the Financial Crisis? 5. Should GE continue to increase its dividend or pursue non financial acquisitions? 6. Was the financial crisis a “blessing in disguise” for GE? PAGE 29-2 Copyright ©2015 Pearson Education, Inc. Company BackgroundFor more than a century, General Electric (GE), has been a global leader and iconic brand known for innovation and leadership in a wide range of endeavors. Its diver-sified portfolio of products is organized into four strategic business units: energy, technology infrastructure, GE Capital, and home and business solutions.GE began in 1878 when Thomas Edison formed the Edison General Electric Company (EGEC). Though Edison was best known for inventing the first incan-descent light bulb, he also pioneered systems design for generating and distributing electricity, eventually holding over 1000 patents. Within a few years, the rival Thomas Houston Company, which held key patents in the same area, challenged EGEC’s posi-tion in the marketplace. In 1892, the two companies merged, forming General Electric. GE then parlayed the demand for electricity into the invention of home heating, stoves and other appliances, and refrigeration, transforming American households, and went on to become an innovator in myriad fields, from medicine, aviation, and transportation to plastics and financial services. GE created the GE Credit Corporation (later GE Capi-tal) in the wake of the Great Depression to facilitate the sale of household appliances and provide the option of extended payments for consumers. Innovation defined the organization, and the commitment to research and development remained key.1 GE was one of the original 12 companies that formed the Dow Jones Industrial Average, and the only one of those companies that was still part of the DJIA in 2012. GE was also recognized for cultivating leaders such as Charles Wilson, Ralph Cordiner, Fred Borch, Reginald Jones, and John Welch.2 In the early 1970s under Fred Borch, GE was one of the first companies with a diversified infrastructure to formalize strategic planning at both corporate and business unit levels with its creation of strategic busi-ness units.3GE always saw itself as striving to create a world that worked better, “making what few in the world can, but everyone needs.”4 The company’s strategic philosophy centered on innovation, superior technology, and demonstrating leadership in growth markets. GE sought to maintain a strong competitive advantage through innovation, smart capital allocation, and solidifying customer re ...
CASE 29General Electric, GE Capital and the Financial Crisis
CASE 29General Electric, GE Capital and the Financial Crisis
TawnaDelatorrejs
✍️
The Drive Is A Trait Described By Kirkpatrick And Locke
The Drive Is A Trait Described By Kirkpatrick And Locke
Karen Oliver
Company BackgroundFor more than a century, General Electric (GE), has been a global leader and iconic brand known for innovation and leadership in a wide range of endeavors. Its diver-sified portfolio of products is organized into four strategic business units: energy, technology infrastructure, GE Capital, and home and business solutions.GE began in 1878 when Thomas Edison formed the Edison General Electric Company (EGEC). Though Edison was best known for inventing the first incan-descent light bulb, he also pioneered systems design for generating and distributing electricity, eventually holding over 1000 patents. Within a few years, the rival Thomas Houston Company, which held key patents in the same area, challenged EGEC’s posi-tion in the marketplace. In 1892, the two companies merged, forming General Electric. GE then parlayed the demand for electricity into the invention of home heating, stoves and other appliances, and refrigeration, transforming American households, and went on to become an innovator in myriad fields, from medicine, aviation, and transportation to plastics and financial services. GE created the GE Credit Corporation (later GE Capi-tal) in the wake of the Great Depression to facilitate the sale of household appliances and provide the option of extended payments for consumers. Innovation defined the organization, and the commitment to research and development remained key.1 GE was one of the original 12 companies that formed the Dow Jones Industrial Average, and the only one of those companies that was still part of the DJIA in 2012. GE was also recognized for cultivating leaders such as Charles Wilson, Ralph Cordiner, Fred Borch, Reginald Jones, and John Welch.2 In the early 1970s under Fred Borch, GE was one of the first companies with a diversified infrastructure to formalize strategic planning at both corporate and business unit levels with its creation of strategic busi-ness units.3GE always saw itself as striving to create a world that worked better, “making what few in the world can, but everyone needs.”4 The company’s strategic philosophy centered on innovation, superior technology, and demonstrating leadership in growth markets. GE sought to maintain a strong competitive advantage through innovation, smart capital allocation, and solidifying customer relationships. The strategy also included transition-ing from an industrial conglomerate to an infrastructure leader to maximize the core strengths of its existing businesses. Diversification and expansion of its business port-folio was a central focus, designed to minimize volatility and create stability through varying growth cycles. Another facet of GE’s strategy was to invest for the long-term in high-growth market opportunities that were closely related to its core businesses. For instance, in 2010 the company launched the GE Advantage Program that focused on process excellence and innovation to improve margins in industrial projects.5 One of GE’s biggest oper ...
Company BackgroundFor more than a century, General Electric (GE),
Company BackgroundFor more than a century, General Electric (GE),
LynellBull52
Part of Our Final Requirement in Business Policy. International Case of a Manufacturing Activity.
General Electric Company
General Electric Company
Agatha Asuncion
Today here in Suzzanne Uhland Slideshare, we want to talk about real household names and how they found themselves so deep in trouble, they had to declare bankruptcy.
The Largest Bankruptcies In The United States
The Largest Bankruptcies In The United States
Suzzanne Uhland
General Electric’s Corporate Strategy Case Write-up Individual Assignment Please read the GE Case and address the following four questions: (1) What role do culture and values play in GE’s strategy? (2) Is GE’s corporate strategy viable for the future? (3) Why is GE proposing to sell its light bulb and appliances divisions? (4) What are the threats to the corporate strategy? These questions will be the basis for a class discussion. The Task is to create a five-page critique of the article, “When Altruism Isn’t Moral,” by Sally Satel. The critique should identify the thesis, method the author is using to support the thesis, the audience, tone, bias, manipulation, believability, and support of the thesis. Paper Requirements The analysis requires the additional components: · One nameless/anonymous or web reference. · Three APA formatted short quotes used to support the paper. · One APA formatted figure. · APA formatted paper including: o Font: Times New Roman, 12 point, and double-spaced. o Margins: One-inch margins, all around. o Indents: One-half inch indent as to begin a paragraph. o Proper APA citations and references. o Proper use of Level 1 headings as to label the introduction, main body, and conclusions segments. o Proper use of Level 2 headings as to label the sections within the main body and conclusions. o A reference page utilizing hanging indents and alphabetized by the last name of the first author. TB0383 Copyright © 2014 Thunderbird School of Global Management. All rights reserved. This case was prepared by Professor Andrew C. Inkpen with research assistance from Wes Edens and Siva Palli for the purpose of classroom discussion only, and not to indicate either effective or ineffective management. Andrew C. Inkpen General Electric’s Corporate Strategy Like the premature obituary of writer Mark Twain, reports of the death of the conglomerate are often exaggerated. Diversified companies, straddling multiple industries, or even just different parts of one large sector, remain a dominant, if not always fashionable, feature of stock markets from the U.S. to continental Europe and Asia. But a new backlash against conglomerates suggests that a more lasting shift in investor preferences may be taking place—driven in part by the growing influence of hedge funds and private equity houses. In public markets, big has rarely appeared less beautiful.1 Through the 1990s and 2000s, large diversified firms, often called conglomerates, largely fell out of favor with investors. Arguments against conglomerates ranged from complexity in management to the difficulties that analysts and investors had in understanding their operations. More recently, conglomerates have regained some respect. As the largest of the U.S. diversified multinational firms, General Electric Company (GE), with over 300,000 employees, generated a variety of opinions, such as: Increasingly restive General Electric Co. shareholders, frus ...
General Electric’s Corporate Strategy Case Write-upIndividual .docx
General Electric’s Corporate Strategy Case Write-upIndividual .docx
hanneloremccaffery
✍️
Jack Welch And His Transformation Of General Electric
Jack Welch And His Transformation Of General Electric
Katyana Londono
The presentation gives an eye view of the General Electric performance under different leadership(CEO) made difference in the company. The business carries risk and uncertainty, the one who forsight can take by the company at the high level, others...
What the hell is wrong with general electric?
What the hell is wrong with general electric?
Dev Prakash Singh
General Electric Presentation
General Electric Presentation
scholarballer51
Ge mcis
Ge mcis
madhvih
Fortune 500
Fortune 500
komal rathore
Paper written for college course regarding one of the few companies in the last 30 years that have made such radical changes to their infrastructure and Operations as General Electric.
Radical Changes in GE Operations
Radical Changes in GE Operations
Brian Rakowski
Saylor URL: http://www.saylor.org/books Saylor.org 273 Chapter 9 Executing Strategy through Organizational Design L E A R N I N G O B J E C T I V E S After reading this chapter, you should be able to understand and articulate answers to the following questions: 1. What are the basic building blocks of organizational structure? 2. What types of structures exist, and what are advantages and disadvantages of each? 3. What is control and why is it important? 4. What are the different forms of control and when should they be used? 5. What are the key legal forms of business, and what implications does the choice of a business form have for organizational structure? Can Oil Well Services Fuel Success for GE? Chapter 9 from Mastering Strategic Management was adapted by The Saylor Foundation under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 license without attribution as requested by the work’s original creator or licensee. © 2014, The Saylor Foundation. http://www.saylor.org/site/textbooks/Mastering%20Strategic%20Management.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Saylor URL: http://www.saylor.org/books Saylor.org 274 General Electric’s logo has changed little since its creation in the 1890s, but the company has grown to become the sixth largest in the United States. Image courtesy of The General Electric Company, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Early_General_Electric_logo_1899.png. In February 2011, General Electric (GE) reached an agreement to acquire the well-support division of John Wood Group PLC for $2.8 billion. This was GE’s third acquisition of a company that provides services to oil wells in only five months. In October 2010, GE added the deepwater exploration capabilities of Wellstream Holdings PLC for $1.3 billion. In December 2010, part and equipment maker Dresser was acquired for $3 billion. By spending more than $7 billion on these acquisitions, GE executives made it clear that they had big plans within the oil well services business. While many executives would struggle to integrate three new companies into their firms, experts expected GE’s leaders to smoothly execute the transitions. In describing the acquisition of John Wood Group PLC, for example, one Wall Street analyst noted, “This is a nice bolt-on deal for GE.”[1] In other words, this analyst believed that John Wood Group PLC could be seamlessly added to GE’s corporate empire. The way that GE was organized fueled this belief. GE’s organizational structure includes six divisions, each devoted to specific product categories: (1) Energy (the most profitable division), (2) Capital (the largest division), (3) Home & Business Solution s, (4) Healthcare, (5) Aviation, and (6) Transportation. Within the Energy division, there are three subdivisions: (1) Oil & Gas, (2) Power & Water, and (3) Energy Services. Rather than having the entire organization involved with integrating Jo ...
Saylor URL httpwww.saylor.orgbooks Saylor.org 273 .docx
Saylor URL httpwww.saylor.orgbooks Saylor.org 273 .docx
infantkimber
Saylor URL: http://www.saylor.org/books Saylor.org 273 Chapter 9 Executing Strategy through Organizational Design L E A R N I N G O B J E C T I V E S After reading this chapter, you should be able to understand and articulate answers to the following questions: 1. What are the basic building blocks of organizational structure? 2. What types of structures exist, and what are advantages and disadvantages of each? 3. What is control and why is it important? 4. What are the different forms of control and when should they be used? 5. What are the key legal forms of business, and what implications does the choice of a business form have for organizational structure? Can Oil Well Services Fuel Success for GE? Chapter 9 from Mastering Strategic Management was adapted by The Saylor Foundation under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 license without attribution as requested by the work’s original creator or licensee. © 2014, The Saylor Foundation. http://www.saylor.org/site/textbooks/Mastering%20Strategic%20Management.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Saylor URL: http://www.saylor.org/books Saylor.org 274 General Electric’s logo has changed little since its creation in the 1890s, but the company has grown to become the sixth largest in the United States. Image courtesy of The General Electric Company, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Early_General_Electric_logo_1899.png. In February 2011, General Electric (GE) reached an agreement to acquire the well-support division of John Wood Group PLC for $2.8 billion. This was GE’s third acquisition of a company that provides services to oil wells in only five months. In October 2010, GE added the deepwater exploration capabilities of Wellstream Holdings PLC for $1.3 billion. In December 2010, part and equipment maker Dresser was acquired for $3 billion. By spending more than $7 billion on these acquisitions, GE executives made it clear that they had big plans within the oil well services business. While many executives would struggle to integrate three new companies into their firms, experts expected GE’s leaders to smoothly execute the transitions. In describing the acquisition of John Wood Group PLC, for example, one Wall Street analyst noted, “This is a nice bolt-on deal for GE.”[1] In other words, this analyst believed that John Wood Group PLC could be seamlessly added to GE’s corporate empire. The way that GE was organized fueled this belief. GE’s organizational structure includes six divisions, each devoted to specific product categories: (1) Energy (the most profitable division), (2) Capital (the largest division), (3) Home & Business Solution s, (4) Healthcare, (5) Aviation, and (6) Transportation. Within the Energy division, there are three subdivisions: (1) Oil & Gas, (2) Power & Water, and (3) Energy Services. Rather than having the entire organization involved with integrating Jo.
Saylor URL httpwww.saylor.orgbooks Saylor.org 273 .docx
Saylor URL httpwww.saylor.orgbooks Saylor.org 273 .docx
jeffsrosalyn
Reasons of whole down fall to GM
Case no -3.3 GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
Case no -3.3 GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
swetadobariya96
Case StudiesCase Studies LABOR MARKETS AND LABOR UNIONS Case Study 12.1: Winner-Take-All Labor Markets Each year Forbes magazine lists the multimillion-dollar earnings of top entertainers and professional athletes. Oprah Winfrey has made that list each year for more than two decades. Her annual income adds up. With wealth now in the billions, she ranks among the world’s richest people. Entertainment and pro sports have come to be called winner-take-all labor markets because a few key individuals critical to the overall success of an enterprise are richly rewarded. For example, the credits at the end of a movie list a hundred or more people directly involved in the production. Hundreds, sometimes thousands, more work behind the scenes. Despite a huge cast and crew, the difference between a movie’s fi nancial success and failure depends primarily on the performance of just a few critical people— the screenwriter, the director, and the lead actors. The same happens in sports. In professional golf tournaments, attendance and TV ratings are signifi cantly higher with Tiger Woods in the mix. In professional basketball, LeBron James has been credited with fi lling once-empty seats and boosting the value of his team by $160 million. Thus, top performers generate a high marginal revenue product. But high productivity alone is not enough. To be paid anywhere near their marginal revenue product, there must be an open competition for top performers. This bids up pay, such as the $20 million per movie garnered by top stars—about 2,000 times the average annual acting earnings of Screen Actors Guild members. Simon Cowell reportedly earned $36 million judging American Idol in his fi nal contract year; he was expected to leave that show to develop a new one that could earn him twice as much. In professional sports, before the free-agency rule was introduced (which allows players to seek the highest bidder), top players couldn’t move on their own from team to team. They were stuck with the team that drafted them, earning only a fraction of their marginal revenue product. Relatively high pay in entertainment and sports is not new. What is new is the spread of winner-take-all to other U.S. markets. The “star” treatment now extends to such fi elds as management, law, banking, fi nance, even academia. Consider, for example, corporate pay. In 1980, the chief executive offi cers (CEOs) of the 200 largest U.S. corporations earned about about 42 times more than the average production worker. Now, this multiple tops 200. Comparable multiples are much lower in Germany and Japan. Why the big U.S. jump? First, the U.S. economy has grown sharply in recent decades and is by far the largest in the world—with output equaling that of the next three economies combined. So U.S. businesses serve a wider market, making the CEO potentially more productive and more valuable. Second, breakthroughs in communications, production, and transportat ...
Case StudiesCase StudiesLABOR MARKETS AND LABOR UNIONSCa.docx
Case StudiesCase StudiesLABOR MARKETS AND LABOR UNIONSCa.docx
tidwellveronique
Welsh Consultants publishes- Whether it’s running a multinational company or a family business, being the CEO requires a special set of skills. The demands are even greater for those taking the helm at a struggling company. A turnaround boss needs to have a clear action plan and goals, a realistic timeline, and the support of the company’s board and senior managers. Even the best strategy, however, needs to be accompanied by financial results, whether it’s greater market share, larger profits, a higher stock price, or preferably all three. Few can rival the success of Apple’s Steve Jobs, who returned to the company he founded, transforming it into the most profitable technology player in the world. So which CEOs have succeeded where others have not? Author, Founder- Manish P
Turnaround CEOs
Turnaround CEOs
Manish Parsuramka
TB0383 Copyright © 2014 Thunderbird School of Global Management. All rights reserved. This case was prepared by Professor Andrew C. Inkpen with research assistance from Wes Edens and Siva Palli for the purpose of classroom discussion only, and not to indicate either effective or ineffective management. Andrew C. Inkpen General Electric’s Corporate Strategy Like the premature obituary of writer Mark Twain, reports of the death of the conglomerate are often exaggerated. Diversified companies, straddling multiple industries, or even just different parts of one large sector, remain a dominant, if not always fashionable, feature of stock markets from the U.S. to continental Europe and Asia. But a new backlash against conglomerates suggests that a more lasting shift in investor preferences may be taking place—driven in part by the growing influence of hedge funds and private equity houses. In public markets, big has rarely appeared less beautiful.1 Through the 1990s and 2000s, large diversified firms, often called conglomerates, largely fell out of favor with investors. Arguments against conglomerates ranged from complexity in management to the difficulties that analysts and investors had in understanding their operations. More recently, conglomerates have regained some respect. As the largest of the U.S. diversified multinational firms, General Electric Company (GE), with over 300,000 employees, generated a variety of opinions, such as: Increasingly restive General Electric Co. shareholders, frustrated with six years of meager returns, are pressuring Chairman Jeffrey Immelt to break up the conglomerate. But some shareholders and analysts argue that GE’s sprawling businesses are better off together than apart. GE’s big umbrella, these investors say, can balance differing product and economic cycles, while helping all its busi- nesses financially. And that would boost the stock price over the longer term. “The main appeal of GE is its diversification,” says Mark Demos, portfolio manager at Fifth Third Asset Management, which owns 12.6 million GE shares. He says this isn’t the time to break up the company, because global economic trends and investor sentiment are moving toward bigger, more international companies such as GE.2 GE’s Background GE’s roots go back to 1890 when Thomas Edison established Edison General Electric Company. In 1892, Edison General Electric Company merged with Thomson-Houston Company. The new company was called General Electric Company. Several of Edison’s early products were still part of GE in 2008, including lighting, transportation, industrial products, power transmission, and medical equipment. GE is the only company listed in the Dow Jones Industrial Index today that was also included in the original index in 1896. Over the century after its founding, GE made hundreds of acquisitions and expanded far beyond its original businesses. By 1980, GE products ranged from plastics, consumer electron ...
TB0383Copyright © 2014 Thunderbird School of Global Manage.docx
TB0383Copyright © 2014 Thunderbird School of Global Manage.docx
ssuserf9c51d
Presentation given in Strategic Management.
Welch
Welch
Yash Bajaj
General Electric Two Decade Transformation.
Jack Welch's Leadership Skill
Jack Welch's Leadership Skill
Muzzamil Shaikh
At its peak, General Motors controlled half the American auto market, but after decades of decline, it was finally brought to its knees by the recession and frozen credit markets, forcing the company into the arms of the federal government .
What happened to GM and how was its recovery