SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 40
Business Ethics Scale
Development
JOHN A. PARNELL
University of North Carolina at Pembroke
Miguel Valasquez
University of Texas at Dallas
Purpose
• Ayn Rand’s contribution to both philosophy
and common discourse in business circles
is well documented and embodied in her
publication of Atlas Shrugged over a half-
century ago.
• This paper describes the examination of
Parnell & Dent’s objectivism scale.
Scale Assessment
• The scale purports to assess the four
categories that principally embody Rand’s
philosophy, including:
– Metaphysics
– Epistemology
– Ethics
– Politics
Outline
• A three-sample process of scale
development, starting with Rand’s four
categories
• Resulting in a multi-dimensional scale that
largely supports her conceptualization of
the construct
Scale
• Ayn Rand’s work has had a persistent and
recently resurgent interest since the
publication of Atlas Shrugged over a half-
century ago
• Her philosophy, Objectivism, purports to offer
a realistic philosophy that should allow for
successful achievement in life
• Presently no easy or systematic way to
determine whether an individual holds
Objectivist beliefs, and to what degree. There
is no extant scale to measure Objectivism
Scale
• This scale assesses the four categories that
principally embody Rand’s philosophy
– Metaphysics (Objective Reality),
– Epistemology (Reason),
– Ethics (Self-interest)
– Politics (Capitalism)
• Rand’s work was primarily outside of the
scholar community
• The work of predecessors had to be surfaced
to trace appropriately the development of
these four categories
Scale
• This paper outlines a three-sample
process of scale development, starting
with Rand’s four categories
– resulting in a multi-dimensional scale that
largely supports her conceptualization of the
construct
Randian Objectivism
• Rand was careful to define terms and work
logically
• Ambiguity around a term such as reason
created issues with scale development
– Two people both employing reason may still
come to different conclusions
Randian Objectivism
• The Politics category also presented a
challenge in scale development because
Rand’s briefest answer to her position in this
area is capitalism
• There are many elements of her philosophy
in politics
– Politics is commonly defined as “the science or
study of government and the state.”
– how and when the military should be employed,
are not encapsulated in the answer, capitalism
Data Analysis
Table 2: Scale Items
Item Subscale Factor Loading
Metaphysics (alpha=.600)
1. Reality exists as an objective absolute. .544
2. Reality is in part or in whole subjective; what is real to one person
is not necessarily real to another. (R) .791
3. Truth is neither absolute nor objective, but it is derived from each
individual’s understanding of things. (R) .714
4. Reality is the same for all individuals. .590
Epistemology (alpha=.772)
5. Reason is the most reliable means of perceiving reality. .831
6. Reason should be the only guide to a person’s actions. .592
7. One’s actions should always be guided by one’s reasoning ability. .821
8. Reason is man’s basic means of survival. .850
Ethics (alpha=.788)
9. Each person must exist for his or her own sake, not the wishes
of the community. .701
10. One should not be compelled to sacrifice oneself for the good of a
group. .705
11. One should never expect others to sacrifice for one’s own benefit. .856
12. The highest purpose for one’s life is the pursuit of one’s rational
self-interest. .623
13. One’s highest calling is to pursue one’s own desires in life. .600
14. There is nothing inherently immoral about the pursuit of self-
interests. .558
Politics (alpha=.831)
15. Capitalism is the only moral economic system because it is
based on voluntary exchange and mutual benefit. .760
16. Ideally, there should be a total separation of state and economics. .559
17. It is not necessary for the government to play a role in a nation’s
economic affairs. .714
18. A centrally planned economy is not moral because individuals are
not free to exchange their own capital and labor as they wish. .761
19. The government should play little if any role in a nation’s
economic affairs. .839
20. No unfair monopoly can develop if there is free trade in a free
market. .774
Data Analysis
Table 3: Principle Components Analysis
Politics Ethics Epistem Metaphysics
Item
1. .006 .330 .151 .544
2. -.101 -.096 -.132 .791
3. .057 -.325 -.097 .714
4. .127 .145 .189 .590
5. -.117 -.043 .831 .033
6. .118 .129 .592 .114
7. -.023 .009 .821 -.045
8. .006 -.152 .850 -.102
9. .043 .701 .001 -.035
10. -.002 .705 -.051 -.025
11. -.168 .856 -.096 .036
12. .018 .623 .205 -.022
13. .141 .600 .053 -.156
14. .026 .558 -.113 -.027
15. .760 -.123 .019 .091
16. .559 .176 -.057 .103
17. .714 .178 -.101 .042
18. .761 .064 -.099 -.180
19. .839 .024 -.090 .055
20. .774 -.261 .225 -.088
Rotation: Promax with Kaiser Normalization.
Data Analysis
Table 4: Factor Correlations
Factor Metaphysics Epistemology Ethics Politics
Coefficient Alpha .600 .772 .788 .831
Metaphysics 1.00
Epistemology .125 1.00
Ethics .015 .532* 1.00
Politics .098 .440* .534* 1.00
* correlation significant at the .01 level.
Data Analysis
Table 5 – Correlations of Objectivism scale with other scales
Politics Ethics Epist Metaph OrgC JobS Career PerfS Emot Introv Consc Open Agree
Politics 1.00 .534**
.440**
.125*
.170**
.194**
.241**
.282**
.422**
.079 .116*
.150**
.023
Ethics .534**
1.00 .532**
.015 .038 .077 .146**
.228**
.417**
-.060 .058 .202**
.142*
Epistemology .440**
.532**
1.00 .098 .085 .083 .170**
.202**
.369**
.048 .045 .192**
.177**
Metaphysics .125*
.015 .098 1.00 -.115*
-.043 -.032 .025 .095 .118*
-.048 -.018 -.104
OrgCommittment.170**
.038 .085 -.115*
1.00 .649**
.403**
.294**
-.042 -.102 .364**
.208**
.268**
JobSatisfaction .194**
.077 .083 -.043 .649**
1.00 .457**
.369**
-.028 .014 .201**
.235**
.144*
CareerSat .241**
.146**
.170**
-.032 .403**
.457**
1.00 .478**
-.007 .011 .314**
.330**
.069
PerfSat .282**
.228**
.202**
.025 .294**
.369**
.478**
1.00 .123*
-.020 .116*
.183**
.135*
EmotInstability .422**
.417**
.369**
.095 -.042 -.028 -.007 .123*
1.00 .129*
-.279**
-.080 -.005
Introverted .079 -.060 .048 .118*
-.102 .014 .011 -.020 .129*
1.00 -.022 .085 -.268**
Conscient .116*
.058 .045 -.048 .364**
.201**
.314**
.116*
-.279**
-.022 1.00 .297**
.112*
OpenToExper .150**
.202**
.192**
-.018 .208**
.235**
.330**
.183**
-.080 .085 .297**
1.00 .064
Agreeable .023 .142*
.177**
-.104 .268**
.144*
.069 .135*
-.005 -.268**
.112*
.064 1.00
** = .01 * = .05
N = 310
Data Analysis
Table 6 – Correlation of Objectivism subscales with Porter’s Five Forces Scale
Meta Epist Ethics Pol NewEnt Supp Subst Buyer Rival
Metaphysics 1.00 -.015 -.330*
-.069 .040 .060 .186 .068 -.214
Epistemology -.015 1.00 .154 .027 .492**
-.059 .424**
.003 .380*
Ethics -.330*
.154 1.00 .145 .253 .240 .288 .008 .425**
Politics -.069 .027 .145 1.00 .171 .320*
-.134 .373*
.111
NewEntrant .040 .492**
.253 .171 1.00 .323*
.694**
.409**
.741**
Suppliers .060 -.059 .240 .320*
.323*
1.00 .412**
.638**
.410**
Substitute .186 .424**
.288 -.134 .694**
.412**
1.00 .099 .633**
Buyers .068 .003 .008 .373*
.409**
.638**
.099 1.00 .321*
Rivalry -.214 .380*
.425**
.111 .741**
.410**
.633**
.321*
1.00
** = .01 * = .05
N=43
Data Analysis
Table 7 – Correlations of Objectivism subscales assessed at three times
MetaA MetaB MetaC Ep1 Ep2 Ep3 EthA EthB EthC PolA PolB PolC
MetaA 1.00 .884**
.770**
-.015 .000 -.239 -.330*
-.278 -.259 -.069 .008 .027
MetaB .884**
1.00 .739**
-.078 -.004 -.268 -.302*
-.262 -.213 .015 -.028 .042
MetaC .770**
.739**
1.00 -.217 -.168 -.334*
-.340*
-.348*
-.368*
.104 .149 .225
EpistA -.015 -.078 -.217 1.00 .696**
.700**
.154 .154 .116 .027 -.011 .006
EpistB .000 -.004 -.168 .696**
1.00 .708**
.155 .144 .207 -.045 -.018 .098
EpistC -.239 -.268 -.334*
.700**
.708**
1.00 .457**
.416**
.459**
.118 .152 .170
EthicsA -.330*
-.302*
-.340*
.154 .155 .457**
1.00 .866**
.741**
.145 .191 .228
EthicsB -.278 -.262 -.348*
.154 .144 .416**
.866**
1.00 .785**
.132 .137 .234
EthicsC -.259 -.213 -.368*
.116 .207 .459**
.741**
.785**
1.00 .084 .120 .298
PoliticsA -.069 .015 .104 .027 -.045 .118 .145 .132 .084 1.00 .830**
.746**
PoliticsB .008 -.028 .149 -.011 -.018 .152 .191 .137 .120 .830**
1.00 .785**
PoliticsC .027 .042 .225 .006 .098 .170 .228 .234 .298 .746**
.785**
1.00
** = .01 * = .05
N = 43
Data Analysis
Table 8 – Factor analyses of 3 maximally dissimilar items from samples 3 and 4
Pattern Matrix
Sample 3 N=310 (Promax Rotation) Component 1 Component 2
Reality exists as an objective absolute. .000 .999
I find that my values and the organization’s values are very similar..769 .032
I really care about the fate of this organization. .771 -.032
Pattern Matrix
Sample 4 N=43 (Promax Rotation) Component 1 Component 2
Reality exists as an objective absolute. .000 .999
I find that my values and the organization’s values are very similar..893 .016
I really care about the fate of this organization. .893 -.016
Data Analysis
Table 9 – Correlations of objectivism scales with organizationally important outcomes
Variable Metaphysics Epistemology Ethics Politics
Metaphysics 1.00 .084 .192* -.221*
Epistemology .084 1.00 .353* .258*
Ethics .192* .353* 1.00 .137*
Politics -.221* .258* .137* 1.00
Structure Administration -.018 -.093 -.164* .022
Pay Level Satisfaction -.053 -.153* -.100 -.007
Benefit Satisfaction -.103 -.002 -.296* -.009
Raise Satisfaction -.018 -.137 -.239* -.041
Customer Service .053 -.192* -.043 -.106
Technical Service Performance .123 .052 -.082 -.173*
Goal Oriented Performance .149* .014 .112 -.129
General Performance .177* -.096 .040 -.133
Service Quality Performance .154* -.191* .046 -.129
Job Mobility -.056 -.047 .120 .170*
Voluntary Trust .216* .141* .144* .033
Absenteeism .102 .214* .315* .052
Lateness .106 .153* .215* -.039
Behavioral Intentions to Quit .128 .043 .345* -.116
Behavioral Intentions to Search .074 .018 .221* -.100
Benefit Equity -.004 .092 .140* .139*
* = .05
N = 245
Data Analysis
Table 10 Pattern Matrix- Lithuaniaa
Item Component
1 2 3 4
1. -.018 .040 .426 .521
2. .218 .078 .199 -.616
3. .278 .060 .241 -.533
4. .236 .083 .082 .684
5. -.066 -.094 .932 .035
6. .321 .123 .335 .291
7. -.006 -.016 .733 .191
8. -.022 -.069 .850 -.003
9. .847 .021 -.117 -.010
10. .952 -.037 -.190 .047
11. .582 -.049 .159 -.019
12. .818 .058 -.010 .026
13. .847 -.122 .070 -.078
14. -.076 -.034 .579 -.218
15. .192 .378 .248 -.028
16. .084 .820 -.171 .074
17. .070 .884 -.105 .012
18. -.102 .618 .283 -.177
19. -.250 .918 .047 .004
20. .044 .738 -.135 .043
Rotation Method: Promax with Kaiser Normalization.
Data Analysis
Table 11 – Correlations of objectivism scales with organizationally important outcomes-
Lithuania
Variable Ethics Politics Epistemology Metaphysics
Ethics 1.00 .402* .532* -.039
Politics .402* 1.00 .393* .063
Epistemology .532* .393* 1.00 .053
Metaphysics .039 .063 .053 1.00
Don’t Harm Others .035 .079 .093* .060
Individualism .444* .183* .226* *.021
Situationalism .328* .033 .310* -.175*
Idealism .257* .260* .102 .172*
Stemberg Ethics .445* .352* .161* .164*
Stemberg Wisdom .128 .034 .310* .052
* = .05
Data Analysis
Metaphysics
• The Oxford English Dictionary defines
metaphysics as:
• “the branch of philosophy that deals with the
first principles of things or reality, including
questions about being, substance, time and
space, causation, change, and identity (which
are presupposed in the special sciences but
do not belong to any one of them); theoretical
philosophy as the ultimate science of being
and knowing” (oed.com).
Metaphysics
• There are a variety of viewpoints about
metaphysics, including the postmodernist
perspective which claims
– “to have rejected not one thesis or another but
rather the entire philosophical tradition from
Plato through George Santayana” (Seaton,
1999).
• Metaphysics is perhaps better understood
by the questions in its domain rather than
by a definition
Metaphysics
• Rand was asked to describe the essence of
her philosophy while standing on one foot,
she began her response by stating that her
metaphysics is objective reality
• Rand (1982) characterizes this objective
reality in two primary ways:
– The primacy of existence or the primacy of
consciousness (p. 32). The universe is material
and exists independent of any entity’s conscious
experience of it.
– That everything has an identity, “things are what
they are” (p. 32).
Epistemology
• Epistemology:
– “the theory or science of the method or
grounds of knowledge,” (oed.com)
– A step toward practicality since its domain is
the method or approach used to access
reality, however defined metaphysically.
Epistemology
• Rand’s one-word description of her epistemology
is reason. As she did with metaphysical
questions, Rand (1982) has fashioned her
epistemology in the form of questions, first her
own perspective followed by one that she rejects:
– “Does man acquire knowledge by a process of
reason—or by sudden revelation from a supernatural
power? Is reason a faculty that identifies and
integrates the material provided by man’s senses—or
is it fed by innate ideas, implanted in man’s mind
before he was born? Is reason competent to perceive
reality—or does man possess some other cognitive
faculty which is superior to reason? Can man achieve
certainty—or is he doomed to perpetual doubt?”
Morality/Ethics
• . The Oxford English Dictionary defines
morality as “Relating to morals,” and moral
as “human character or behaviour
considered as good or bad; the distinction
between right and wrong, or good and evil,
in relation to the actions, desires, or
character of responsible human beings;
ethical” (oed.com)
Morality/Ethics
• Rand’s one-word description of her
morality/ethics is self-interest
– The “standard of value of the Objectivist
ethics—the standard by which one judges
what is good or evil—is man’s life, or: that
which is required for man’s survival qua man.
Politics
• Aristotle (and Plato) is also credited with
some of the earliest written documents on the
subjects of political ideology, fairness, justice,
and equity.
• The Oxford English Dictionary defines politics
as:
– “activities or policies associated with government,
esp. those concerning the organization and
administration of a state, or part of a state, and
with the regulation of relationships between
states” (oed.com).
Politics
• Politics is a far broader topic than the first
three introduced because there are so
many permutations of how individuals
intersect with the state and how states
interface with each other.
• Topics range from private property rights
to whom the state allows to marry to the
possibility of a currency being shared by
countries.
Politics
• Rand’s one-word description of her politics
is capitalism:
– “basic and crucial political issue of our age is:
capitalism versus socialism, or freedom
versus statism. For decades, this issue has
been silenced, suppressed, evaded, and
hidden under the foggy, undefined rubber-
terms of “conservatism” and “liberalism” which
had lost their original meaning and could be
stretched to mean all things to all men” (Rand,
1966, p. 178).
Scale Development
• Authors collaborated and developed a 60-
item Likert-oriented instrument
including18, 12, 10, and 10 items as
prospective measures of the hypothesized
metaphysical, epistemological, ethical, and
political dimensions of the construct.
– A group of 114 managers were recruited to
complete the initial survey.
Scale Development
• Exploratory factor analyses were conducted
for each set of items corresponding to the
hypothesized dimensions
• Items with either communalities or factor
loadings below 0.4 were eliminated from
further consideration
• Eigenvalues, multi-factor solutions, and
correlations were also examined, resulting in
several additional removals
Scale Development
• Twenty-two items survived this stage of
scrutiny
• Six in each of the first three dimensions
and four in the political dimension
• Eleven additional items were developed
– one for each of the first three dimensions and
seven for the politics dimension
Scale Development
• In the second stage, the 32-item scale was
administered to another cross section of 213
practicing managers
– Results were subjected to exploratory factor
analyzes along the four dimensions
• Eigenvalues, multi-factor solutions, and
correlations were also examined as well
• Four items survived scrutiny in each of the
metaphysics, epistemology, and ethics
dimensions, and three items survived in the
politics dimension
Scale Development
• In the third stage, the resulting scale was
administered within a large Chinese
technology organization
– Two hundred and thirty responses were
received. All were in managerial positions
and 55.2 (127) were males
Item Analysis
• Metaphysics
– The metaphysics factor contained only four items
• Although 3 factor loadings were greater than .600 this
dimension was the most difficult to conceptualize
– A large number of items were discarded in the
first two stages when subsequent analysis
revealed the potential for significant confusion
– The remaining items can present some degree of
ambiguity
Item Analysis
• Epistemology
– The epistemology factor emphasized the
superiority of reason as a means of
interpreting reality and contained four items
• Three of the loadings exceeded .700
– Eight items did not survive the scrutiny of the
first two stages, including those juxtaposing
reason and revelation from a higher being
• Items referring to reason as the primary but not
only means of interpreting reality were also
rejected
Item Analysis
• Ethics
– The ethics factor emphasized self-interest and
contained five items
• Items in the scale emphasized a rational self-interest
– Strongly worded items did not survive the scrutiny
– The concept is frequently used interchangeably
with greed and complete ignorance of others,
Randian self-interest is an informed, rational
perspective
• As such, a self-interested person does not wish ill will
on others
Item Analysis
• Politics
– The politics factor emphasized capitalism—
most notably private property rights and free
enterprise—as the political system consistent
with objectivism and contained six items
– The remaining two dimensions -
Confucianism and Socialism each had two
items and it is expected that they would not
be stable with data from other cultures
Future Directions
• Is Rand’s conceptualization of objectivism—
including the four dimensions—the best
representation of the construct? The notion
of objectivism invokes a dispositional
perspective, assuming that an individual’s
approach to decision-making is relatively
stable. By definition, it eschews a situational
or adaptive perspective, insomuch that
objectivism rejects the idea that there are
multiple valid interpretations of reality.

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Rethinking marketing
Rethinking marketingRethinking marketing
Rethinking marketing
rohtashmal
 
Comment une marque peut intégrer une dimension émotionnelle grâce à la réalit...
Comment une marque peut intégrer une dimension émotionnelle grâce à la réalit...Comment une marque peut intégrer une dimension émotionnelle grâce à la réalit...
Comment une marque peut intégrer une dimension émotionnelle grâce à la réalit...
Laurence Thébault
 

Viewers also liked (9)

Aline e beatriz
Aline e beatrizAline e beatriz
Aline e beatriz
 
Final Project
Final ProjectFinal Project
Final Project
 
Rethinking marketing
Rethinking marketingRethinking marketing
Rethinking marketing
 
Livre blanc : modeles, data et algorithmes, les nouvelles frontieres du numér...
Livre blanc : modeles, data et algorithmes, les nouvelles frontieres du numér...Livre blanc : modeles, data et algorithmes, les nouvelles frontieres du numér...
Livre blanc : modeles, data et algorithmes, les nouvelles frontieres du numér...
 
La Réalité Augmentée - C'est quoi ?
La Réalité Augmentée - C'est quoi ?La Réalité Augmentée - C'est quoi ?
La Réalité Augmentée - C'est quoi ?
 
Koninklijk paleis te Brussel wordt heringericht
Koninklijk paleis te Brussel wordt heringerichtKoninklijk paleis te Brussel wordt heringericht
Koninklijk paleis te Brussel wordt heringericht
 
Comment une marque peut intégrer une dimension émotionnelle grâce à la réalit...
Comment une marque peut intégrer une dimension émotionnelle grâce à la réalit...Comment une marque peut intégrer une dimension émotionnelle grâce à la réalit...
Comment une marque peut intégrer une dimension émotionnelle grâce à la réalit...
 
Creating a digital transformation vision
Creating a digital transformation visionCreating a digital transformation vision
Creating a digital transformation vision
 
MobiliteaTime #6 - #TravelXperience (ENGLISH VERSION)
MobiliteaTime #6 - #TravelXperience (ENGLISH VERSION)MobiliteaTime #6 - #TravelXperience (ENGLISH VERSION)
MobiliteaTime #6 - #TravelXperience (ENGLISH VERSION)
 

Similar to ParnellValasquezOxford2015

Week 3 Psy 480 DiscussionsDiscussion 1 - Explain the interdepe.docx
Week 3 Psy 480 DiscussionsDiscussion 1 - Explain the interdepe.docxWeek 3 Psy 480 DiscussionsDiscussion 1 - Explain the interdepe.docx
Week 3 Psy 480 DiscussionsDiscussion 1 - Explain the interdepe.docx
melbruce90096
 
Sweet_Meaghan_TTI_SI
Sweet_Meaghan_TTI_SI Sweet_Meaghan_TTI_SI
Sweet_Meaghan_TTI_SI
Meaghan Sweet
 
Class lecture notes # 2 (statistics for research)
Class lecture notes # 2 (statistics for research)Class lecture notes # 2 (statistics for research)
Class lecture notes # 2 (statistics for research)
Harve Abella
 

Similar to ParnellValasquezOxford2015 (12)

Week 3 Psy 480 DiscussionsDiscussion 1 - Explain the interdepe.docx
Week 3 Psy 480 DiscussionsDiscussion 1 - Explain the interdepe.docxWeek 3 Psy 480 DiscussionsDiscussion 1 - Explain the interdepe.docx
Week 3 Psy 480 DiscussionsDiscussion 1 - Explain the interdepe.docx
 
CHAPONE edited Stat.pptx
CHAPONE edited Stat.pptxCHAPONE edited Stat.pptx
CHAPONE edited Stat.pptx
 
Sweet_Meaghan_TTI_SI
Sweet_Meaghan_TTI_SI Sweet_Meaghan_TTI_SI
Sweet_Meaghan_TTI_SI
 
Graphical Data Exploration
Graphical Data ExplorationGraphical Data Exploration
Graphical Data Exploration
 
Class lecture notes # 2 (statistics for research)
Class lecture notes # 2 (statistics for research)Class lecture notes # 2 (statistics for research)
Class lecture notes # 2 (statistics for research)
 
Business Statistics
Business StatisticsBusiness Statistics
Business Statistics
 
Eastern Screech Owl Research Paper
Eastern Screech Owl Research PaperEastern Screech Owl Research Paper
Eastern Screech Owl Research Paper
 
7 qc tools
7 qc tools7 qc tools
7 qc tools
 
Business Statistics
Business StatisticsBusiness Statistics
Business Statistics
 
Introduction to Business Statistics
Introduction to Business StatisticsIntroduction to Business Statistics
Introduction to Business Statistics
 
Scientific Management
Scientific ManagementScientific Management
Scientific Management
 
S4 pn
S4 pnS4 pn
S4 pn
 

ParnellValasquezOxford2015

  • 1. Business Ethics Scale Development JOHN A. PARNELL University of North Carolina at Pembroke Miguel Valasquez University of Texas at Dallas
  • 2. Purpose • Ayn Rand’s contribution to both philosophy and common discourse in business circles is well documented and embodied in her publication of Atlas Shrugged over a half- century ago. • This paper describes the examination of Parnell & Dent’s objectivism scale.
  • 3. Scale Assessment • The scale purports to assess the four categories that principally embody Rand’s philosophy, including: – Metaphysics – Epistemology – Ethics – Politics
  • 4. Outline • A three-sample process of scale development, starting with Rand’s four categories • Resulting in a multi-dimensional scale that largely supports her conceptualization of the construct
  • 5. Scale • Ayn Rand’s work has had a persistent and recently resurgent interest since the publication of Atlas Shrugged over a half- century ago • Her philosophy, Objectivism, purports to offer a realistic philosophy that should allow for successful achievement in life • Presently no easy or systematic way to determine whether an individual holds Objectivist beliefs, and to what degree. There is no extant scale to measure Objectivism
  • 6. Scale • This scale assesses the four categories that principally embody Rand’s philosophy – Metaphysics (Objective Reality), – Epistemology (Reason), – Ethics (Self-interest) – Politics (Capitalism) • Rand’s work was primarily outside of the scholar community • The work of predecessors had to be surfaced to trace appropriately the development of these four categories
  • 7. Scale • This paper outlines a three-sample process of scale development, starting with Rand’s four categories – resulting in a multi-dimensional scale that largely supports her conceptualization of the construct
  • 8. Randian Objectivism • Rand was careful to define terms and work logically • Ambiguity around a term such as reason created issues with scale development – Two people both employing reason may still come to different conclusions
  • 9. Randian Objectivism • The Politics category also presented a challenge in scale development because Rand’s briefest answer to her position in this area is capitalism • There are many elements of her philosophy in politics – Politics is commonly defined as “the science or study of government and the state.” – how and when the military should be employed, are not encapsulated in the answer, capitalism
  • 10. Data Analysis Table 2: Scale Items Item Subscale Factor Loading Metaphysics (alpha=.600) 1. Reality exists as an objective absolute. .544 2. Reality is in part or in whole subjective; what is real to one person is not necessarily real to another. (R) .791 3. Truth is neither absolute nor objective, but it is derived from each individual’s understanding of things. (R) .714 4. Reality is the same for all individuals. .590 Epistemology (alpha=.772) 5. Reason is the most reliable means of perceiving reality. .831 6. Reason should be the only guide to a person’s actions. .592 7. One’s actions should always be guided by one’s reasoning ability. .821 8. Reason is man’s basic means of survival. .850 Ethics (alpha=.788) 9. Each person must exist for his or her own sake, not the wishes of the community. .701 10. One should not be compelled to sacrifice oneself for the good of a group. .705 11. One should never expect others to sacrifice for one’s own benefit. .856 12. The highest purpose for one’s life is the pursuit of one’s rational self-interest. .623 13. One’s highest calling is to pursue one’s own desires in life. .600 14. There is nothing inherently immoral about the pursuit of self- interests. .558 Politics (alpha=.831) 15. Capitalism is the only moral economic system because it is based on voluntary exchange and mutual benefit. .760 16. Ideally, there should be a total separation of state and economics. .559 17. It is not necessary for the government to play a role in a nation’s economic affairs. .714 18. A centrally planned economy is not moral because individuals are not free to exchange their own capital and labor as they wish. .761 19. The government should play little if any role in a nation’s economic affairs. .839 20. No unfair monopoly can develop if there is free trade in a free market. .774
  • 11. Data Analysis Table 3: Principle Components Analysis Politics Ethics Epistem Metaphysics Item 1. .006 .330 .151 .544 2. -.101 -.096 -.132 .791 3. .057 -.325 -.097 .714 4. .127 .145 .189 .590 5. -.117 -.043 .831 .033 6. .118 .129 .592 .114 7. -.023 .009 .821 -.045 8. .006 -.152 .850 -.102 9. .043 .701 .001 -.035 10. -.002 .705 -.051 -.025 11. -.168 .856 -.096 .036 12. .018 .623 .205 -.022 13. .141 .600 .053 -.156 14. .026 .558 -.113 -.027 15. .760 -.123 .019 .091 16. .559 .176 -.057 .103 17. .714 .178 -.101 .042 18. .761 .064 -.099 -.180 19. .839 .024 -.090 .055 20. .774 -.261 .225 -.088 Rotation: Promax with Kaiser Normalization.
  • 12. Data Analysis Table 4: Factor Correlations Factor Metaphysics Epistemology Ethics Politics Coefficient Alpha .600 .772 .788 .831 Metaphysics 1.00 Epistemology .125 1.00 Ethics .015 .532* 1.00 Politics .098 .440* .534* 1.00 * correlation significant at the .01 level.
  • 13. Data Analysis Table 5 – Correlations of Objectivism scale with other scales Politics Ethics Epist Metaph OrgC JobS Career PerfS Emot Introv Consc Open Agree Politics 1.00 .534** .440** .125* .170** .194** .241** .282** .422** .079 .116* .150** .023 Ethics .534** 1.00 .532** .015 .038 .077 .146** .228** .417** -.060 .058 .202** .142* Epistemology .440** .532** 1.00 .098 .085 .083 .170** .202** .369** .048 .045 .192** .177** Metaphysics .125* .015 .098 1.00 -.115* -.043 -.032 .025 .095 .118* -.048 -.018 -.104 OrgCommittment.170** .038 .085 -.115* 1.00 .649** .403** .294** -.042 -.102 .364** .208** .268** JobSatisfaction .194** .077 .083 -.043 .649** 1.00 .457** .369** -.028 .014 .201** .235** .144* CareerSat .241** .146** .170** -.032 .403** .457** 1.00 .478** -.007 .011 .314** .330** .069 PerfSat .282** .228** .202** .025 .294** .369** .478** 1.00 .123* -.020 .116* .183** .135* EmotInstability .422** .417** .369** .095 -.042 -.028 -.007 .123* 1.00 .129* -.279** -.080 -.005 Introverted .079 -.060 .048 .118* -.102 .014 .011 -.020 .129* 1.00 -.022 .085 -.268** Conscient .116* .058 .045 -.048 .364** .201** .314** .116* -.279** -.022 1.00 .297** .112* OpenToExper .150** .202** .192** -.018 .208** .235** .330** .183** -.080 .085 .297** 1.00 .064 Agreeable .023 .142* .177** -.104 .268** .144* .069 .135* -.005 -.268** .112* .064 1.00 ** = .01 * = .05 N = 310
  • 14. Data Analysis Table 6 – Correlation of Objectivism subscales with Porter’s Five Forces Scale Meta Epist Ethics Pol NewEnt Supp Subst Buyer Rival Metaphysics 1.00 -.015 -.330* -.069 .040 .060 .186 .068 -.214 Epistemology -.015 1.00 .154 .027 .492** -.059 .424** .003 .380* Ethics -.330* .154 1.00 .145 .253 .240 .288 .008 .425** Politics -.069 .027 .145 1.00 .171 .320* -.134 .373* .111 NewEntrant .040 .492** .253 .171 1.00 .323* .694** .409** .741** Suppliers .060 -.059 .240 .320* .323* 1.00 .412** .638** .410** Substitute .186 .424** .288 -.134 .694** .412** 1.00 .099 .633** Buyers .068 .003 .008 .373* .409** .638** .099 1.00 .321* Rivalry -.214 .380* .425** .111 .741** .410** .633** .321* 1.00 ** = .01 * = .05 N=43
  • 15. Data Analysis Table 7 – Correlations of Objectivism subscales assessed at three times MetaA MetaB MetaC Ep1 Ep2 Ep3 EthA EthB EthC PolA PolB PolC MetaA 1.00 .884** .770** -.015 .000 -.239 -.330* -.278 -.259 -.069 .008 .027 MetaB .884** 1.00 .739** -.078 -.004 -.268 -.302* -.262 -.213 .015 -.028 .042 MetaC .770** .739** 1.00 -.217 -.168 -.334* -.340* -.348* -.368* .104 .149 .225 EpistA -.015 -.078 -.217 1.00 .696** .700** .154 .154 .116 .027 -.011 .006 EpistB .000 -.004 -.168 .696** 1.00 .708** .155 .144 .207 -.045 -.018 .098 EpistC -.239 -.268 -.334* .700** .708** 1.00 .457** .416** .459** .118 .152 .170 EthicsA -.330* -.302* -.340* .154 .155 .457** 1.00 .866** .741** .145 .191 .228 EthicsB -.278 -.262 -.348* .154 .144 .416** .866** 1.00 .785** .132 .137 .234 EthicsC -.259 -.213 -.368* .116 .207 .459** .741** .785** 1.00 .084 .120 .298 PoliticsA -.069 .015 .104 .027 -.045 .118 .145 .132 .084 1.00 .830** .746** PoliticsB .008 -.028 .149 -.011 -.018 .152 .191 .137 .120 .830** 1.00 .785** PoliticsC .027 .042 .225 .006 .098 .170 .228 .234 .298 .746** .785** 1.00 ** = .01 * = .05 N = 43
  • 16. Data Analysis Table 8 – Factor analyses of 3 maximally dissimilar items from samples 3 and 4 Pattern Matrix Sample 3 N=310 (Promax Rotation) Component 1 Component 2 Reality exists as an objective absolute. .000 .999 I find that my values and the organization’s values are very similar..769 .032 I really care about the fate of this organization. .771 -.032 Pattern Matrix Sample 4 N=43 (Promax Rotation) Component 1 Component 2 Reality exists as an objective absolute. .000 .999 I find that my values and the organization’s values are very similar..893 .016 I really care about the fate of this organization. .893 -.016
  • 17. Data Analysis Table 9 – Correlations of objectivism scales with organizationally important outcomes Variable Metaphysics Epistemology Ethics Politics Metaphysics 1.00 .084 .192* -.221* Epistemology .084 1.00 .353* .258* Ethics .192* .353* 1.00 .137* Politics -.221* .258* .137* 1.00 Structure Administration -.018 -.093 -.164* .022 Pay Level Satisfaction -.053 -.153* -.100 -.007 Benefit Satisfaction -.103 -.002 -.296* -.009 Raise Satisfaction -.018 -.137 -.239* -.041 Customer Service .053 -.192* -.043 -.106 Technical Service Performance .123 .052 -.082 -.173* Goal Oriented Performance .149* .014 .112 -.129 General Performance .177* -.096 .040 -.133 Service Quality Performance .154* -.191* .046 -.129 Job Mobility -.056 -.047 .120 .170* Voluntary Trust .216* .141* .144* .033 Absenteeism .102 .214* .315* .052 Lateness .106 .153* .215* -.039 Behavioral Intentions to Quit .128 .043 .345* -.116 Behavioral Intentions to Search .074 .018 .221* -.100 Benefit Equity -.004 .092 .140* .139* * = .05 N = 245
  • 18. Data Analysis Table 10 Pattern Matrix- Lithuaniaa Item Component 1 2 3 4 1. -.018 .040 .426 .521 2. .218 .078 .199 -.616 3. .278 .060 .241 -.533 4. .236 .083 .082 .684 5. -.066 -.094 .932 .035 6. .321 .123 .335 .291 7. -.006 -.016 .733 .191 8. -.022 -.069 .850 -.003 9. .847 .021 -.117 -.010 10. .952 -.037 -.190 .047 11. .582 -.049 .159 -.019 12. .818 .058 -.010 .026 13. .847 -.122 .070 -.078 14. -.076 -.034 .579 -.218 15. .192 .378 .248 -.028 16. .084 .820 -.171 .074 17. .070 .884 -.105 .012 18. -.102 .618 .283 -.177 19. -.250 .918 .047 .004 20. .044 .738 -.135 .043 Rotation Method: Promax with Kaiser Normalization.
  • 19. Data Analysis Table 11 – Correlations of objectivism scales with organizationally important outcomes- Lithuania Variable Ethics Politics Epistemology Metaphysics Ethics 1.00 .402* .532* -.039 Politics .402* 1.00 .393* .063 Epistemology .532* .393* 1.00 .053 Metaphysics .039 .063 .053 1.00 Don’t Harm Others .035 .079 .093* .060 Individualism .444* .183* .226* *.021 Situationalism .328* .033 .310* -.175* Idealism .257* .260* .102 .172* Stemberg Ethics .445* .352* .161* .164* Stemberg Wisdom .128 .034 .310* .052 * = .05
  • 21. Metaphysics • The Oxford English Dictionary defines metaphysics as: • “the branch of philosophy that deals with the first principles of things or reality, including questions about being, substance, time and space, causation, change, and identity (which are presupposed in the special sciences but do not belong to any one of them); theoretical philosophy as the ultimate science of being and knowing” (oed.com).
  • 22. Metaphysics • There are a variety of viewpoints about metaphysics, including the postmodernist perspective which claims – “to have rejected not one thesis or another but rather the entire philosophical tradition from Plato through George Santayana” (Seaton, 1999). • Metaphysics is perhaps better understood by the questions in its domain rather than by a definition
  • 23. Metaphysics • Rand was asked to describe the essence of her philosophy while standing on one foot, she began her response by stating that her metaphysics is objective reality • Rand (1982) characterizes this objective reality in two primary ways: – The primacy of existence or the primacy of consciousness (p. 32). The universe is material and exists independent of any entity’s conscious experience of it. – That everything has an identity, “things are what they are” (p. 32).
  • 24. Epistemology • Epistemology: – “the theory or science of the method or grounds of knowledge,” (oed.com) – A step toward practicality since its domain is the method or approach used to access reality, however defined metaphysically.
  • 25. Epistemology • Rand’s one-word description of her epistemology is reason. As she did with metaphysical questions, Rand (1982) has fashioned her epistemology in the form of questions, first her own perspective followed by one that she rejects: – “Does man acquire knowledge by a process of reason—or by sudden revelation from a supernatural power? Is reason a faculty that identifies and integrates the material provided by man’s senses—or is it fed by innate ideas, implanted in man’s mind before he was born? Is reason competent to perceive reality—or does man possess some other cognitive faculty which is superior to reason? Can man achieve certainty—or is he doomed to perpetual doubt?”
  • 26. Morality/Ethics • . The Oxford English Dictionary defines morality as “Relating to morals,” and moral as “human character or behaviour considered as good or bad; the distinction between right and wrong, or good and evil, in relation to the actions, desires, or character of responsible human beings; ethical” (oed.com)
  • 27. Morality/Ethics • Rand’s one-word description of her morality/ethics is self-interest – The “standard of value of the Objectivist ethics—the standard by which one judges what is good or evil—is man’s life, or: that which is required for man’s survival qua man.
  • 28. Politics • Aristotle (and Plato) is also credited with some of the earliest written documents on the subjects of political ideology, fairness, justice, and equity. • The Oxford English Dictionary defines politics as: – “activities or policies associated with government, esp. those concerning the organization and administration of a state, or part of a state, and with the regulation of relationships between states” (oed.com).
  • 29. Politics • Politics is a far broader topic than the first three introduced because there are so many permutations of how individuals intersect with the state and how states interface with each other. • Topics range from private property rights to whom the state allows to marry to the possibility of a currency being shared by countries.
  • 30. Politics • Rand’s one-word description of her politics is capitalism: – “basic and crucial political issue of our age is: capitalism versus socialism, or freedom versus statism. For decades, this issue has been silenced, suppressed, evaded, and hidden under the foggy, undefined rubber- terms of “conservatism” and “liberalism” which had lost their original meaning and could be stretched to mean all things to all men” (Rand, 1966, p. 178).
  • 31. Scale Development • Authors collaborated and developed a 60- item Likert-oriented instrument including18, 12, 10, and 10 items as prospective measures of the hypothesized metaphysical, epistemological, ethical, and political dimensions of the construct. – A group of 114 managers were recruited to complete the initial survey.
  • 32. Scale Development • Exploratory factor analyses were conducted for each set of items corresponding to the hypothesized dimensions • Items with either communalities or factor loadings below 0.4 were eliminated from further consideration • Eigenvalues, multi-factor solutions, and correlations were also examined, resulting in several additional removals
  • 33. Scale Development • Twenty-two items survived this stage of scrutiny • Six in each of the first three dimensions and four in the political dimension • Eleven additional items were developed – one for each of the first three dimensions and seven for the politics dimension
  • 34. Scale Development • In the second stage, the 32-item scale was administered to another cross section of 213 practicing managers – Results were subjected to exploratory factor analyzes along the four dimensions • Eigenvalues, multi-factor solutions, and correlations were also examined as well • Four items survived scrutiny in each of the metaphysics, epistemology, and ethics dimensions, and three items survived in the politics dimension
  • 35. Scale Development • In the third stage, the resulting scale was administered within a large Chinese technology organization – Two hundred and thirty responses were received. All were in managerial positions and 55.2 (127) were males
  • 36. Item Analysis • Metaphysics – The metaphysics factor contained only four items • Although 3 factor loadings were greater than .600 this dimension was the most difficult to conceptualize – A large number of items were discarded in the first two stages when subsequent analysis revealed the potential for significant confusion – The remaining items can present some degree of ambiguity
  • 37. Item Analysis • Epistemology – The epistemology factor emphasized the superiority of reason as a means of interpreting reality and contained four items • Three of the loadings exceeded .700 – Eight items did not survive the scrutiny of the first two stages, including those juxtaposing reason and revelation from a higher being • Items referring to reason as the primary but not only means of interpreting reality were also rejected
  • 38. Item Analysis • Ethics – The ethics factor emphasized self-interest and contained five items • Items in the scale emphasized a rational self-interest – Strongly worded items did not survive the scrutiny – The concept is frequently used interchangeably with greed and complete ignorance of others, Randian self-interest is an informed, rational perspective • As such, a self-interested person does not wish ill will on others
  • 39. Item Analysis • Politics – The politics factor emphasized capitalism— most notably private property rights and free enterprise—as the political system consistent with objectivism and contained six items – The remaining two dimensions - Confucianism and Socialism each had two items and it is expected that they would not be stable with data from other cultures
  • 40. Future Directions • Is Rand’s conceptualization of objectivism— including the four dimensions—the best representation of the construct? The notion of objectivism invokes a dispositional perspective, assuming that an individual’s approach to decision-making is relatively stable. By definition, it eschews a situational or adaptive perspective, insomuch that objectivism rejects the idea that there are multiple valid interpretations of reality.