5. ▪ Save the lives of 600 women and 5,000 children*
▪ Prevent, detect, respond to epidemics and ensure zero cases of EVD
▪ Double access to electricity from 125,000 to 250,000 households
▪ Double the total operational power generation capacity from 75MW to 150MW
▪ Provide safe, affordable and sustainable water supply services to 600,000 people in Freetown*
▪ Provide safe water supply to 700,000 people in the provinces
§ Ensure continuous care for EVD-affected persons and survivors
§ Provide income support to 59,000 vulnerable households
▪ Create 10,000 jobsacross key agriculture value chains
▪ Support 1,000 MSMEs to increase their competitiveness, including agribusinesses across key value
chains
▪ Improved service delivery and efficiency of Government spendingfor
recovery priority sectors
▪ Improve learning outcomes by training at least 40,000 teachers in core subjects and reducing
overcrowding in severely affected schools
▪ Institute nationwide school feeding for 1.2 million children in all GoSL and GoSL assisted primary
schools
Prioritisation with concrete targets - 13 Key Results to be delivered in 7
Sectors by 30th June 2017…...
*Significant and irreversible progress to be made by June 2017 but target due to be fully met in 2018
6. § Start / End dates
§ Responsible person
§ Responsible Implementing Partner & person
§ District and chiefdom of implementation
Key Result
Area
Initiatives
Sub-initiative
Sub-initiative
Milestones
Milestones
Milestones
Milestones
Activities
Activities
Activities
Activities
Activities
Activities
Activities
Each activity plan includes:
Each KRA is broken into priority
initiatives and sub-initiatives…
Planning for each sub-initiative is done at the
milestone and activity levels…
Detailed activity plans are developed and documented in 3-6 month cycles
Priority initiatives have been designed to achieve the 13 Key Results;
milestones have been identified to help us track progress of initiatives
InitiativesPriority
Initiatives
Key results driven by priority initiatives, sub-initiatives and detailed activity plans
Plans structure
Milestones are documented for the period to
June 2017 …
7. Education KRA 1: Improve learning outcomes by training at least
40,000 teachers in core subjects and reducing overcrowding in
severely affected schools
KRA 1: Improve learning outcomes by training at least 40,000 teachers in core subjects and reducing overcrowding in severely affected schools
2016 2017
Initiative name1
Increase quality of instruction in schools
Clear payroll and reallocate teachers
Reduce unapproved schools
Improve monitoring and coordination in districts via centralized
situation room
Reduce overcrowded classrooms
Improve Water and Sanitation Hygiene (WASH) in Schools
1 Indicators, targets and data sources for all initiatives are under review
Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Ongoing training waves
complete
Math and English lesson
plans ready for >40k teachers
Activity plan review and recalibration
New WASH construct-
ed in up to 360 schools
M&E report
shared
WASH units construction
and rehab underway
Needs assessment
completed
Construction
sites agreed
Planning phase
ends
>225 classrooms
Constructed and furnished
>500 furnished
classrooms complete
Revised standards
communicated
Teacher allocation
strategy approved
Teacher needs
map created
Teacher reallo-
cation complete
First wave of training
complete for >40k teachers
Payroll
cleared
Districts re-trained
on processes
New capabilities achieved
in data tracking tools
Districts trained
on using tools
Monitoring
period ends
>150 schools evaluated
and acted on Wave 1
>150 schools evaluated
and acted on Wave 2
>150 schools evaluated
and acted on in Wave 3
Systemic changes
implemented
Process
evaluated
Implementation Tracking
Visible milestones
Process milestones
9. Total PRP Budget = US$ 839 Million Comments
DevelopmentPartner support combination of new money and aligning
of existing programmes - Implementing Partners play a significant role
▪ 83% (US$532.67M) of donor
funding to PRP is channeled
through Implementing Partners
(IPs)
▪ Thus need for enhanced
collaboration and coordination
between IPs and MDAs in terms of
ensuring required deliverables are
met
▪ Key feature of the process is
alignment of DP and IP
programmes and therefore budgets
with the PRP initiatives
GoSL
Donor
78%
($641.77M)
22%
($179.63M)
MDAs
IPs
83%
($532.67M)
17%
($109.10M)
Funds committed (exc gap) Donor funds to IPs and MDAs
Total Budget
Donor
GoSL
Gap
PRP total
839.01
641.77
179.63
17.61
Excl. Energy
437.93
395.39
24.93
17.61
Energy
401.08
246.38
154.70
-
10. Plan, oversee, and
report to Presidential
and Ministerial
Delivery Forum
Districts implement
and report to Central
MDAs
Monitor and evaluate
Core responsibility Direct support from
▪ Central MDAs
▪ Ministers and commissioners
▪ KRA Leads
▪ Initiative and sub-initiative
owners
▪ Sector coordinators
▪ KRA facilitators
▪ Technical Assistants
(embedded in the MDAs)
▪ District MDAs
▪ District Councils for devolved
functions
▪ District-based implementing
partners
▪ Private Sector participants
▪ District Facilitators
▪ District Analysts
▪ Central and District MDAs
▪ Paramount Chiefs
▪ District Councils
▪ Bi-annual independent
evaluation
▪ Community Engagement
Officers
▪ Quality Assurance Roving
Team
Presidential Delivery Team
Decentralisation emphasis - delivering the President's Recovery
Priorities at the district level
Central Delivery
Team and
Technical
Assistants
support all
functions
Community ownership is critical to success
11. Minister
KRA 1 Lead KRA 2 Lead
C
MDA Delivery Team
Composition:
• Minister (or designate)
• KRA Leads
• Priority Initiative Owners
• M&E Officer
• Comms Officer / PRO
• DT Sector Coordinator
• DT KRA Facilitator
C
F
Delivery Team Sector Coordinator
• Works directly with MDA leadership, including Minister, to drive delivery
Delivery Team KRA Facilitator
• Supports MDA KRA Lead(s) and works with the Priority Initiative Owners
F
Initiative Working Group
Composition:
• Priority Initiative Owner
(internal to MDA)
• Sub-initiative owners
from responsible MDAs
• Other technical support,
as needed
• Implementing partner(s)
• Relevant development
partner(s)
• Other stakeholders
• DT KRA Facilitator (as
required)
Priority
initiative
working
groups:
Delivery structures within the MDAs
12. Delivery structures at District Level
District Delivery Forum
District Delivery Forum:
• CouncilChairman (co-
chaired by Mayor, where
applicable)
• Chief Administrator
• Heads of District MDAs
• District Facilitator
• District Analyst
F
A
District Facilitator
• Supports District Councilin its coordination and oversight role
District Data Analyst
• Supports District Counciland MDAs for monitoring & evaluation and data analysis related to the
PRPs
District Sector Working
Group Composition:
• Head of District MDA
• M&E Officer
• Sector representative from
District Council
• Stakeholder groups
• Implementing Parnters
• District Facilitator
• District Analyst
C
Community Engagement Officer
• Works with District Office and Paramount Chiefsto support community-levelengagement
A
F
13. Priority initiatives and sub-initiatives show
weekly progress through trackers reported at
Presidential and Ministerial Delivery Forums
Each priority initiative and sub-initiative team have
selected performance metrics…
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Delivery
Indicators (DIs) monitor success at the KRA
through sub-initiative levels
Robust performance management- Implementation of initiatives
tracked for completion, performance and accountability
… which are reported on regularly to track
progress
Implementation of detailed activity plans updated in Activity Tracker on a weekly basis
Sector Key Result Area
Maternal and Child health
Most Delayed milestone
District micro planning (75 Days)
Resilient Zero
National Sanitation baseline values established
and sanitation/CLTS communities mapped
(88 days)
EVD Survivor Care
ProgrammeImplementation Unit (PIU) providing
oversight for CPES (73 days)
Improve learning outcomes
by training and reducing
overcrowding
School feeding for 1.2mil
children
Create 10,000 agricultural
jobs
Maintenance of reforested areas (54 days)
Stakeholder consultative forum on agriculture
financing organized (55 days)
Support 1,000 MSMEs to
increase their competitiveness
Health
Social
Protection
Education
PSD
Started1 Completed2
76/84 24/40
75%-100% 50%-74% <50%
84/89 8/21
35/36 18/20
7/7 3/4
50/62 25/38
35/35 16/23
13/13 7/8
MoSWGCA
MoHS
Local Content Act reviewed (57 days)
34/56 20/31
1 Milestones which start on time, out of all of those which are scheduled to have started. As of Tuesday 5 pm, of the current week
2 Milestones which end on time, out of all of those which are scheduled to have ended. As of Tuesday 5 pm, of the current week
Change
Secretariat setup (68 days)
Support to Social workforce extended for 10 more
months (62 days)
15. Weekly implementation rhythm designed to report progress and to
identify, escalate and resolve issues
Presidential/ Ministerial
Delivery Forum
Thurs, 2pm
MDA Initiative Working Groups
& District Sector Meetings
Weekly/Bi-Weekly sessions held
before & after Activity Tracker
submission
▪ PDT aggregates MDA
submissions to collate
Milestones hit/missed and
create Delivery Forum
outputs (e.g. milestone
summary and issues for
resolution)
Additional
mechanisms for
issues
identification and
resolution:
• Daily District
sector specific
issues log
• Fortnightly
Sector Deep
Dives to review
milestones
missed
• Quarterly Donor
Deep Dives
• Funds
disbursements
tracker
▪ Post Delivery Forum,
Sector Action Trackers
produced and follow-up
happens via:
– HE meetings
– Bi-lateral MDA
meetings
– Donor meetings
– Other actions
▪ MDAs:
– Implement activities at District and Central level, directly or
via Implementing Partners
– Update activity trackers to report implementation
– Resolve/escalate issues affecting implementation
Activity tracker
updates submitted by
MDAs
Tues, 5pm Weekly
implementation
rhythm
16. Transparency and accountability - Chiefdom and section-level
monitoring of PRP targets deepens community ownership
Overview of Section Targets
198
183
505
281
67
Current breakdown of Sections by Number
of Relevant Delivery Indicators (1,234)
None
1
2-3
4-10
>10
Agriculture: 5
Water: 3
Education: 3
Health: 2
Current Delivery Indicators
available at Section-level
•Additional section targets
will be added in January,
as implementation
progresses.
*70% of sections have 2 or more indicators to monitor
17. We are using online, social and traditional media to keep citizens
and stakeholders informed
195,000 reached
through WhatsApp
This Week in
Recovery
239,000 reached
through Facebook
>700
Twitter followers
PRP Monthly Newsletter, plus
regular articles in the printed
press
presidentsrecovery
priorities.gov.sl
Dedicated PRP
website
‘Leh we make Salone grow’ ,
a half hour magazine style radio programme
giving fortnightly news and
updates on the PRP and dedicated 98.1
“Gud Monin Salon” every Friday
“…the presence of a
delivery unit is not the
only way to drive delivery
and demonstrate
leadership
commitment…citizen
feedback is widely used in
many countries. In fact,
the wide use of social
media and technology
has further amplified the
pressure for political
leaders and governments
to deliver”
“Ministers share experienceof leadership
for delivery” - World Bank Feature Article
June 2014
18. The PRP has an extensive array of monitoring mechanisms to ensure
effective implementation of the PRPs
External monitoring mechanisms
▪ SABI consortium
▪ Independent evaluators
GoSL monitoring mechanisms
▪ PDT
▪ MDAs
▪ District Councils
▪ Paramount / Section Chiefs
19. PRP capability building designed to support sustainability
Establish and embed the skills
needed for delivery
Support counterparts to use the
tools for delivery
Help change expectations and
attitudes through the experience of
delivering results and thus
inculcating new habits to support
delivery long term.
Our Goals
Short-term: In the short term the programme
must ensure capacity is in place to deliver the
President’s Recovery Priorities by June 2017.
Long-term: we aim at more lasting impact, by
handing over delivery processes to a permanent
home (expected to be Performance Management
and Service Delivery Directorate (PMSD)) and by
changing some key individuals’ ways of working,
habits and attitudes.
Culture change is fundamental and we cannot expect –
through a tightly-focused programme in the 13 priority
MDAs – to change a whole system, or to do it overnight.
But by June 2017 we aim to have facilitated and supported
priority leaders to make some measurable impact.
“It could not have come at
a better time. The training
has exposed me to the
flaws that we continually
keep doing in running
meetings” Chairman, District
Council Koinadugu, October 2016
20. Based on risk assessment, 90% of priority initiatives on track to meet at least 50%
of targets by June; 77% will meet 100% of targets by December 2017
1 54
16
26
17
27
Look Forward: 56% of priority initiatives will meet 100% of
targets by 30th June 2017
Timeline Risk
Assessment
48 Initiatives
No issues
Major
issues
Minor issues
Projected to
hit 100% of
target by
June 2017
<50% of target
achieved
50 – 99% of
target by
June 2017
Projected June ‘17
Achievement
48 Initiatives
Sectors
Number of
initiatives
Water 5
Energy 4
Health 1
Total 10
77% of priority initiatives to meet 100% of targets by
December 2017
10 priority initiatives unlikely to meet targets by
December 2017
21. The President’s Recovery Priorities – Focused Delivery of Key Results
07 14611 13 48
Priority Sectors
Education, energy, governance,
health, private sector development,
social welfare, water
Key Result Areas
Moving Sierra Leone back
onto the Agenda for
Prosperity pathway
Sub-initiatives
Delivering change across 7
priority sectors, in 14
districts
Participating MDAs
Ministries of Agriculture, Education,
Energy, Health, Social Welfare, Trade,
Water + NACSA, the ACC, Freetown City
Council & the Sierra Leone Ports Authority
Priority Initiatives
Enabling the achievement of
the 13 Key Result Area
targets
