SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 10
Lyme Disease: Analyzing Temporal, Land Use, Acorn
Distribution, Population, and Climate as Factors
Contributing to Cases in the Northeast United
States
from 2007 to 2011
Created By: Matt Weik
GEOG 522: Final Project
Date: December 11, 2014
Introduction
• Background
– Lyme disease is a vector, arthropod, borne disease
• Requires ticks in order to complete infection cycle
– Borrelia burgdorferi:
• Spirochete (spiral shaped) bacteria
• Double membrane.
– Ixodes spacularis:
• Commonly known as the “deer tick”
• Feed off of blood: can survive 2 years without a blood meal.
• Three life stages (larvae, nymph, and adult):takes 3 years to complete cycle
• Different host at each stage
– Hosts:
• Immature ticks (larvae and Nymph): mice, chipmunks, birds and other small animals
• Mature ticks (adult): Deer, dogs, birds, larger mammals and warm blooded animals.
– Symptoms
• Chills, fever, headache, pain in large joints, swollen lymph nodes, and a bulls-eye rash (Erythema
Migrans)
– Treatment
• By mouth antibiotics
• No treatment within 6 months= chance of Chronic Lyme
Introduction
• Previous Research
– Climate factors
• Growing degree days for nymph ticks growing season , March 1st- September 30th
– Ticks and hosts factors
• White tail deer are being represented by using the area of forest in each county
– If area has enough woodland to support deer population
• Acorn abundance was represented by using the distribution of Oak Tree species
– If area can supply a population of small rodents: common host for immature ticks
– Human factors
• Lyme disease reservoir presence: previous cases show the strength of presence of Lyme-
disease reservoir
• Urban areas: the more urban space has shown it reduces interaction between people
and ticks
– However it has been theorized that more urban area reduced host populations; forcing ticks to
seek humans.
Methodology and Data
• Process
– Gather GIS data into county variables
– Run Principle Component Analysis
– Run regression on PCA components
– Run spatial regression and look for improvement
– Define components that are make up spatial regression
• Data Gathering and Calculating
– Lyme-disease: cases were organized by column: needed FIPS column for unique join
– Oak tree species variation: If the distribution of a species of the Oak tree genus then a value of one was added to the variable;
for example three different types of oaks had a value of 3.
– Land use data and GDD: data were both raster; required extensive use of GIS to manipulate to county level variable.
• GDD had to be averaged for each county based on points representing values.
• Variables:
– Dependent Variable
• P_LD_07_11: The percent of population of Lyme-disease cases between 2007 and 2011
– Independent Variables:
• TGDD_2012: Growing degree days before 2012, or 50 degrees Fahrenheit from March 1:- Sept
• P_LD_97-01: The number of cases per county, normalized by population for years including the previous census data, represents the
temporal factors of the Lyme-disease cycle.
• In addition it can represent the size and prevalence of a disease reservoir in each county.
• Oak_Var: the number of different oak tree species located within the county.
• used to measure acorn distribution, and therefore the region’s carrying capacity of preferred immature tick hosts.
• pforest: The percent of each county that is forest.
• Represents the distribution of white-tailed deer in the northeast area.
• purban: The percent of county that is urban, or developed
» Area void of suitable hosts.
Results
• Principle Component Analysis (PCA)
– Component
• 1: The percent of urban land
• 2:The percent of woodland with small negative effect of GDD= Northern forested land
• 3:The percent of grassland
• 4:The percent of population with Lyme disease between 1997-2001; the status of
disease-reservoir 10 years ago
• 5: Mix- GGD (.823) and Oak species variation (.491)
– Long or very warm growing season, southern located, places with higher diversity of Oak tree
species
• 6:Mix – Oak species variation (.773) and GGD (.456)
– Places with a higher diversity of oak species, and a longer or warmer growing season
Rotated Component Matrix
a
Component
1 2 3 4 5 6
Oak_Var .143 -.275 .115 .072 .823 .456
TGDD_2012 .228 -.318 .092 -.001 .491 .773
Pforest -.230 .895 -.112 -.014 -.248 -.269
Purban .959 -.195 -.004 -.027 .124 .164
P_LD_97_01 -.024 -.011 .176 .983 .042 .009
Pgrass -.002 -.090 .973 .184 .082 .071
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Rotation Method: Equamax with Kaiser Normalization.
a. Rotation converged in 6 iterations.
Results
• R squared: 0.52
• Components 1- 4 significant
at 0.01 level
• Component 5 is significant at
0.05 level
• Component 6 is at the 0.1
• Moran’s I: 8.97; p-value: 0.00
– There is spatial autocorrelation
Results
• Regression:
– Map of Residuals:
Results
• Spatial Regression
– R squared: 0.69
– Component 2,3, and 4 are significant
– Components 1, 5, and 6 not significant
Discussion
• Coefficient Analysis
– From the analysis of both the components created using PCA and then tested using a spatial regression:
• Variables Purban, GGD_2012, and Oak_Var are accounted for in principle components that were not significantly different from 0 ,
– therefore they virtually do not contribute to the variation in the percent of people who became infected with Lyme-disease between 2007 and 2011.
• Variables Pforest, Pgrass, and P_LD_97_01 are accounted for in significant principle components
– Coefficients/Variable not significant
• 1: The percent of urban land
• 5: Mix- GGD (.823) and Oak species variation (.491)
• 6:Mix – Oak species variation (.773) and GGD (.456)
– From PCA and spatial regression:
• Component 2:The percent of woodland with small negative effect of GDD= Northern forested land
• Component 3:The percent of grassland
• Component 4:The percent of population with Lyme disease between 1997-2001; the status of disease-reservoir 10 years ago
• Limitations and Error
– Many more climate and environmental factors exist, but there is limited data: regression does not explain that much variation
(R squared = 0.69)
– Many issues with data set, even after PCA and spatial regression: Failed tests of both normaility and heteroscedasity
– Many of the variables used were based of prior research, but did not have same units or measurement
• Oak tree variation does not necessarily equal abundance of acorns
Conclusion
• While Lyme-disease is rare, and poorly understood, it can
cause debilitating and potentially chronic symptoms if
untreated.
• Complicated cycle of Lyme disease infection, and
differences in host preference for each stages of Tick
lifecycle cause a large number of possible environmental
factors.
• From this study, it seems out of the variables examined that
the percent area in a county that is vegetation (both forest
or grassland), and areas that have a strong disease
reservoir (high number of cases between 1997-2000);
however the percent of urban area in a county, the climate
(growing season or GDD), and variation in Oak species do
not effect this relationship.

More Related Content

Viewers also liked (11)

Matt_Weik_GEOG422_FinalProject
Matt_Weik_GEOG422_FinalProjectMatt_Weik_GEOG422_FinalProject
Matt_Weik_GEOG422_FinalProject
 
Climate_WNV_M_Weik
Climate_WNV_M_WeikClimate_WNV_M_Weik
Climate_WNV_M_Weik
 
Resume_Manjunath Jayaram
Resume_Manjunath JayaramResume_Manjunath Jayaram
Resume_Manjunath Jayaram
 
MattWeik_RP1_ClimateTBD
MattWeik_RP1_ClimateTBDMattWeik_RP1_ClimateTBD
MattWeik_RP1_ClimateTBD
 
Resume_Manjunath Jayaram
Resume_Manjunath JayaramResume_Manjunath Jayaram
Resume_Manjunath Jayaram
 
CA Research Paper
CA Research PaperCA Research Paper
CA Research Paper
 
Resume_Manjunath Jayaram
Resume_Manjunath JayaramResume_Manjunath Jayaram
Resume_Manjunath Jayaram
 
GEOG_525_Final_Presentation_Weik
GEOG_525_Final_Presentation_WeikGEOG_525_Final_Presentation_Weik
GEOG_525_Final_Presentation_Weik
 
Project 2MattWeik
Project 2MattWeikProject 2MattWeik
Project 2MattWeik
 
Spm k1-bab-3-soalan
Spm k1-bab-3-soalanSpm k1-bab-3-soalan
Spm k1-bab-3-soalan
 
Using films in the ESL classroom to improve communication skills of non-nativ...
Using films in the ESL classroom to improve communication skills of non-nativ...Using films in the ESL classroom to improve communication skills of non-nativ...
Using films in the ESL classroom to improve communication skills of non-nativ...
 

Similar to LD_MattWeik_522

Habitat Change Analysis Project
Habitat Change Analysis ProjectHabitat Change Analysis Project
Habitat Change Analysis Project
John Reiser
 
Development and application of core attributes, A first approximation nation...
Development and application of core attributes,  A first approximation nation...Development and application of core attributes,  A first approximation nation...
Development and application of core attributes, A first approximation nation...
Richard Thackway
 

Similar to LD_MattWeik_522 (20)

Participatory GIS for collaborative deer management
Participatory GIS for collaborative deer managementParticipatory GIS for collaborative deer management
Participatory GIS for collaborative deer management
 
Habitat Change Analysis Project
Habitat Change Analysis ProjectHabitat Change Analysis Project
Habitat Change Analysis Project
 
Biodiversity informatics and the agricultural data landscape
Biodiversity informatics and the agricultural data landscapeBiodiversity informatics and the agricultural data landscape
Biodiversity informatics and the agricultural data landscape
 
Spatial Statistics 2017 Conference: Towards the modelling and mapping of acti...
Spatial Statistics 2017 Conference: Towards the modelling and mapping of acti...Spatial Statistics 2017 Conference: Towards the modelling and mapping of acti...
Spatial Statistics 2017 Conference: Towards the modelling and mapping of acti...
 
2013 Poster Session, Geospatial Modeling of Mountain Pine Beetle Mortality by...
2013 Poster Session, Geospatial Modeling of Mountain Pine Beetle Mortality by...2013 Poster Session, Geospatial Modeling of Mountain Pine Beetle Mortality by...
2013 Poster Session, Geospatial Modeling of Mountain Pine Beetle Mortality by...
 
Deforestation diagnostics
Deforestation diagnosticsDeforestation diagnostics
Deforestation diagnostics
 
Seminar final1
Seminar final1Seminar final1
Seminar final1
 
“Predicting the impacts of genetic improvements and climate change on GA-FL-A...
“Predicting the impacts of genetic improvements and climate change on GA-FL-A...“Predicting the impacts of genetic improvements and climate change on GA-FL-A...
“Predicting the impacts of genetic improvements and climate change on GA-FL-A...
 
Assessing ecosystem services over large areas
Assessing ecosystem services over large areasAssessing ecosystem services over large areas
Assessing ecosystem services over large areas
 
TLI 2012: Data management for bean breeding - Ethiopia
TLI 2012: Data management for bean breeding - EthiopiaTLI 2012: Data management for bean breeding - Ethiopia
TLI 2012: Data management for bean breeding - Ethiopia
 
WNS_BLM_Presentation
WNS_BLM_PresentationWNS_BLM_Presentation
WNS_BLM_Presentation
 
E-Bird and Climate Change distribution and abundance models, John Alexander
E-Bird and Climate Change distribution and abundance models, John AlexanderE-Bird and Climate Change distribution and abundance models, John Alexander
E-Bird and Climate Change distribution and abundance models, John Alexander
 
Development and application of core attributes, A first approximation nation...
Development and application of core attributes,  A first approximation nation...Development and application of core attributes,  A first approximation nation...
Development and application of core attributes, A first approximation nation...
 
Ncssa bcm-vegetation condition monitoring workshop
Ncssa bcm-vegetation condition monitoring workshopNcssa bcm-vegetation condition monitoring workshop
Ncssa bcm-vegetation condition monitoring workshop
 
Linking biodiversity data for ecology
Linking biodiversity data for ecologyLinking biodiversity data for ecology
Linking biodiversity data for ecology
 
Is Dormancy an Indicator of Ecotypic Variation?
Is Dormancy an Indicator of Ecotypic Variation?Is Dormancy an Indicator of Ecotypic Variation?
Is Dormancy an Indicator of Ecotypic Variation?
 
Effects of Climate Variability and Change on Forest Ecosystems: A Comprehensi...
Effects of Climate Variability and Change on Forest Ecosystems: A Comprehensi...Effects of Climate Variability and Change on Forest Ecosystems: A Comprehensi...
Effects of Climate Variability and Change on Forest Ecosystems: A Comprehensi...
 
Presentaion by Musana S. Bernard.
Presentaion by Musana S. Bernard. Presentaion by Musana S. Bernard.
Presentaion by Musana S. Bernard.
 
Journal Club presentation_01_12_2022.pptx
Journal Club presentation_01_12_2022.pptxJournal Club presentation_01_12_2022.pptx
Journal Club presentation_01_12_2022.pptx
 
Factors associated with wetland participation
Factors associated with wetland participationFactors associated with wetland participation
Factors associated with wetland participation
 

LD_MattWeik_522

  • 1. Lyme Disease: Analyzing Temporal, Land Use, Acorn Distribution, Population, and Climate as Factors Contributing to Cases in the Northeast United States from 2007 to 2011 Created By: Matt Weik GEOG 522: Final Project Date: December 11, 2014
  • 2. Introduction • Background – Lyme disease is a vector, arthropod, borne disease • Requires ticks in order to complete infection cycle – Borrelia burgdorferi: • Spirochete (spiral shaped) bacteria • Double membrane. – Ixodes spacularis: • Commonly known as the “deer tick” • Feed off of blood: can survive 2 years without a blood meal. • Three life stages (larvae, nymph, and adult):takes 3 years to complete cycle • Different host at each stage – Hosts: • Immature ticks (larvae and Nymph): mice, chipmunks, birds and other small animals • Mature ticks (adult): Deer, dogs, birds, larger mammals and warm blooded animals. – Symptoms • Chills, fever, headache, pain in large joints, swollen lymph nodes, and a bulls-eye rash (Erythema Migrans) – Treatment • By mouth antibiotics • No treatment within 6 months= chance of Chronic Lyme
  • 3. Introduction • Previous Research – Climate factors • Growing degree days for nymph ticks growing season , March 1st- September 30th – Ticks and hosts factors • White tail deer are being represented by using the area of forest in each county – If area has enough woodland to support deer population • Acorn abundance was represented by using the distribution of Oak Tree species – If area can supply a population of small rodents: common host for immature ticks – Human factors • Lyme disease reservoir presence: previous cases show the strength of presence of Lyme- disease reservoir • Urban areas: the more urban space has shown it reduces interaction between people and ticks – However it has been theorized that more urban area reduced host populations; forcing ticks to seek humans.
  • 4. Methodology and Data • Process – Gather GIS data into county variables – Run Principle Component Analysis – Run regression on PCA components – Run spatial regression and look for improvement – Define components that are make up spatial regression • Data Gathering and Calculating – Lyme-disease: cases were organized by column: needed FIPS column for unique join – Oak tree species variation: If the distribution of a species of the Oak tree genus then a value of one was added to the variable; for example three different types of oaks had a value of 3. – Land use data and GDD: data were both raster; required extensive use of GIS to manipulate to county level variable. • GDD had to be averaged for each county based on points representing values. • Variables: – Dependent Variable • P_LD_07_11: The percent of population of Lyme-disease cases between 2007 and 2011 – Independent Variables: • TGDD_2012: Growing degree days before 2012, or 50 degrees Fahrenheit from March 1:- Sept • P_LD_97-01: The number of cases per county, normalized by population for years including the previous census data, represents the temporal factors of the Lyme-disease cycle. • In addition it can represent the size and prevalence of a disease reservoir in each county. • Oak_Var: the number of different oak tree species located within the county. • used to measure acorn distribution, and therefore the region’s carrying capacity of preferred immature tick hosts. • pforest: The percent of each county that is forest. • Represents the distribution of white-tailed deer in the northeast area. • purban: The percent of county that is urban, or developed » Area void of suitable hosts.
  • 5. Results • Principle Component Analysis (PCA) – Component • 1: The percent of urban land • 2:The percent of woodland with small negative effect of GDD= Northern forested land • 3:The percent of grassland • 4:The percent of population with Lyme disease between 1997-2001; the status of disease-reservoir 10 years ago • 5: Mix- GGD (.823) and Oak species variation (.491) – Long or very warm growing season, southern located, places with higher diversity of Oak tree species • 6:Mix – Oak species variation (.773) and GGD (.456) – Places with a higher diversity of oak species, and a longer or warmer growing season Rotated Component Matrix a Component 1 2 3 4 5 6 Oak_Var .143 -.275 .115 .072 .823 .456 TGDD_2012 .228 -.318 .092 -.001 .491 .773 Pforest -.230 .895 -.112 -.014 -.248 -.269 Purban .959 -.195 -.004 -.027 .124 .164 P_LD_97_01 -.024 -.011 .176 .983 .042 .009 Pgrass -.002 -.090 .973 .184 .082 .071 Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. Rotation Method: Equamax with Kaiser Normalization. a. Rotation converged in 6 iterations.
  • 6. Results • R squared: 0.52 • Components 1- 4 significant at 0.01 level • Component 5 is significant at 0.05 level • Component 6 is at the 0.1 • Moran’s I: 8.97; p-value: 0.00 – There is spatial autocorrelation
  • 8. Results • Spatial Regression – R squared: 0.69 – Component 2,3, and 4 are significant – Components 1, 5, and 6 not significant
  • 9. Discussion • Coefficient Analysis – From the analysis of both the components created using PCA and then tested using a spatial regression: • Variables Purban, GGD_2012, and Oak_Var are accounted for in principle components that were not significantly different from 0 , – therefore they virtually do not contribute to the variation in the percent of people who became infected with Lyme-disease between 2007 and 2011. • Variables Pforest, Pgrass, and P_LD_97_01 are accounted for in significant principle components – Coefficients/Variable not significant • 1: The percent of urban land • 5: Mix- GGD (.823) and Oak species variation (.491) • 6:Mix – Oak species variation (.773) and GGD (.456) – From PCA and spatial regression: • Component 2:The percent of woodland with small negative effect of GDD= Northern forested land • Component 3:The percent of grassland • Component 4:The percent of population with Lyme disease between 1997-2001; the status of disease-reservoir 10 years ago • Limitations and Error – Many more climate and environmental factors exist, but there is limited data: regression does not explain that much variation (R squared = 0.69) – Many issues with data set, even after PCA and spatial regression: Failed tests of both normaility and heteroscedasity – Many of the variables used were based of prior research, but did not have same units or measurement • Oak tree variation does not necessarily equal abundance of acorns
  • 10. Conclusion • While Lyme-disease is rare, and poorly understood, it can cause debilitating and potentially chronic symptoms if untreated. • Complicated cycle of Lyme disease infection, and differences in host preference for each stages of Tick lifecycle cause a large number of possible environmental factors. • From this study, it seems out of the variables examined that the percent area in a county that is vegetation (both forest or grassland), and areas that have a strong disease reservoir (high number of cases between 1997-2000); however the percent of urban area in a county, the climate (growing season or GDD), and variation in Oak species do not effect this relationship.