SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 24
Download to read offline
Rob J. Thurston – HR Consulting Group
Matt Gabrielson – Connect Your Benefits
Using plain language for employers, benefits consultants
and brokers.
Review a proven process to evaluate, interview,
compare and select vendors using less time and
fewer resources.
Today’s Presentation
Review a case study demonstrating how Boeing used this
process to find a high-quality vendor and boost employee
engagement.
Learn how working with an expert during vendor selection
makes life easier on your organization.
Today’s Presentation
Outdated vendor selection
processes lead to scope creep,
unexpected costs and poor
outcomes.
Request for Proposal (RFP) bid
processes are time-consuming
and expensive.
Outdated Vendor Selection Processes
Expensive delays and
inadequate resource
allocation during
implementation with new
vendors.
Desired ROI not consistently
achieved due to poor
planning and/or execution.
Outdated Vendor Selection Processes
Unnecessary stress due to
improper vendor selection
or process challenges.
Unforeseen costs not
identified in a RFP method.
Outdated Vendor Selection Processes
New Product Paradigmism
Vision
Time
Objective
Match your time
constraints with
the scope of the
project, with the
resources
available.
Optimal Vendor Selection Process
1. Planning
2. Selection
3. Execution
4. Refinement
Phase 1: Planning
1. Planning
2. Selection
3. Execution
4. Refinement
Planning
1. Define requirements &
desired ROI
2. Obtain initial buy-in from
management
3. Conduct feasibility study &
cost/benefit analysis
4. Get final buy-in from
management
Phase 2: Selection
Selection
1. Evaluate potential vendors:
 Best fit with needs
 Strength of references
 Responsiveness of vendor
 Implementation time and cost
2. Make final selection based
on Vendor Query Response
(VQR)
1. Planning
2. Selection
3. Execution
4. Refinement
Phase 3: Execution
Execution
1. Establish milestones
2. Deliver effective training to
all program leaders and end
users
3. Scale program realistically
1. Planning
2. Selection
3. Execution
4. Refinement
Phase 4: Refinement
Refinement
1. Performance metrics to
measure ROI
2. Adjust messaging to boost
employee participation
3. Embrace beneficial process
and technology changes
1. Planning
2. Selection
3. Execution
4. Refinement
Company: Boeing, the world’s largest aerospace company,
and leading manufacturer of commercial jetliners and
defense, space and security systems.
Case Study – Process In Action
Challenge: Boeing wanted more ancillary benefits to recruit
and retain employees, and to keep the entire workforce
more engaged.
 Home services promotions were identified as a common
interest to its diverse workforce spread across 49 states.
Case Study
Planning: Boeing determined it needed voluntary benefits
that:
 Appealed to every employee
 Were available to employees in every state
 Minimal implementation time
 Minimal training for HR staff
 Not cost-prohibitive on a per-employee basis
 Was a program exclusive to Boeing employees
Case Study – Planning
Selection: Boeing used a Vendor Query Response (VQR) to
compare employee discount programs and services
 Narrowed the field of potential vendors.
 Investigated each vendor’s capacity, security, and process
controls.
 Selected Connect Your Home, an award-winning
national home services retailer.
Case Study – Selection
Execution: Boeing established milestones for the execution
process.
1. Assigned its HR staff to collaborate with the vendor.
2. Boeing worked with the vendor to set milestones for the
project.
Case Study – Execution
3. The vendor provided tailored marketing materials to
promote the program to employees
4. The vendor created Boeing-branded landing pages
5. HR staff promoted the employee engagement ‘discount’
program it’s employee portals and internal
communications
Case Study – Execution
Refinement: Boeing HR staff with the vendor finds new
and creative ways to engage its workforce.
1. Additional home services have been added to the Boeing
portal
2. Special promotions are changed to maintain
relevance to Boeing employees
Case Study – Refinement
• Results: Boeing improved employee engagement with a home services
discount provider.
• New discount program offered to all 150,000 employees nationwide.
• Low impact on HR staff with zero implementation or maintenance cost
• Achieved its objective and cleared the path for
impressive future ROI.
• Implemented a valuable new tool in its effort to
recruit and retain employees, and to keep the
entire workforce more engaged.
Case Study – Results
 Helps HR and Benefits teams maintain their strategic focus
 Ensures timely, cost-effective flow from planning through execution
 Gives your organization a process template for quickly and easily
expanding the benefits programs and technology you offer to
employees
 Ultimately improves your employee recruitment, retention and
engagement as you add new incentives and technology
Successful Vendor Selection
Utilize vendors to provide industry knowledge,
implementation specialists, and maximizing your time &
resources.
 Clear guidance in program planning and preparation
 Faster, more streamlined implementation and setup
 Customization of employee engagement tools
 Ability to keep projects on time due to 24/7 work process
 Uncompromising data security for client organization
and end users
Use Vendors As Your Multipliers
Rob J. Thurston
President
HR Consulting Group
801-787-0416
hrcgpartners@gmail.com
A Better Process – Q&A
Matt Gabrielson
President
Connect Your Benefits
720-539-7516
matt@connectyourbenefits.com
 Rob J. Thurston – HR Consulting Group
 Matt Gabrielson – Connect Your Benefits
Thank You For Attending

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Cost of Poor quality
Cost of  Poor qualityCost of  Poor quality
Cost of Poor quality
 
Cost Reduction using QMS-1
Cost Reduction using QMS-1Cost Reduction using QMS-1
Cost Reduction using QMS-1
 
Design of a Prevention, Appraisal and Failure Cost Model
Design of a Prevention, Appraisal and Failure Cost ModelDesign of a Prevention, Appraisal and Failure Cost Model
Design of a Prevention, Appraisal and Failure Cost Model
 
Cost of quality
Cost of qualityCost of quality
Cost of quality
 
Cost of Poor Quality - Lean Conference 2016
Cost of Poor Quality - Lean Conference 2016Cost of Poor Quality - Lean Conference 2016
Cost of Poor Quality - Lean Conference 2016
 
Cost of quality
Cost of qualityCost of quality
Cost of quality
 
Cost of-poor-quality - juran institute
Cost of-poor-quality - juran instituteCost of-poor-quality - juran institute
Cost of-poor-quality - juran institute
 
Business case using Cost of Quality
Business case using Cost of QualityBusiness case using Cost of Quality
Business case using Cost of Quality
 
Sathish AMD resume
Sathish AMD resumeSathish AMD resume
Sathish AMD resume
 
2. cost of quality
2. cost of quality2. cost of quality
2. cost of quality
 
Cost of quality
Cost of qualityCost of quality
Cost of quality
 
Cost of quality concept and advantages
Cost of quality   concept and advantagesCost of quality   concept and advantages
Cost of quality concept and advantages
 
Quality costing
Quality costingQuality costing
Quality costing
 
Cost of-poor-quality
Cost of-poor-qualityCost of-poor-quality
Cost of-poor-quality
 
Cost of quality
Cost of qualityCost of quality
Cost of quality
 
Resume
ResumeResume
Resume
 
Cost of quality
Cost of qualityCost of quality
Cost of quality
 
COPQ Presentation 2
COPQ Presentation  2COPQ Presentation  2
COPQ Presentation 2
 
cost of quality
cost of qualitycost of quality
cost of quality
 
Tqm through cost of quality
Tqm through cost of qualityTqm through cost of quality
Tqm through cost of quality
 

Similar to EBN Forum Sept 2016 A_Better_Selection_Presentation

Running Head EVALUATION1EVALUATION 2.docx
Running Head EVALUATION1EVALUATION 2.docxRunning Head EVALUATION1EVALUATION 2.docx
Running Head EVALUATION1EVALUATION 2.docxtodd271
 
WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE .docx
WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE                                          .docxWORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE                                          .docx
WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE .docxericbrooks84875
 
Lean pilots by Mariya Breyter from Dun & Bradstreet
Lean pilots by Mariya Breyter from Dun & BradstreetLean pilots by Mariya Breyter from Dun & Bradstreet
Lean pilots by Mariya Breyter from Dun & BradstreetInstitut Lean France
 
Vendor Selection Case Study
Vendor Selection Case Study Vendor Selection Case Study
Vendor Selection Case Study Laura Arber, PMP
 
Practical approaches to address government contracting problems
Practical approaches to address government contracting problemsPractical approaches to address government contracting problems
Practical approaches to address government contracting problemsJohn Gilligan
 
Strategic service initiatives
Strategic service initiativesStrategic service initiatives
Strategic service initiativesAndre Gilbert
 
A guide to conducting Integrated Baseline Reviews, Webinar, 24 May 2016
A guide to conducting Integrated Baseline Reviews, Webinar, 24 May 2016A guide to conducting Integrated Baseline Reviews, Webinar, 24 May 2016
A guide to conducting Integrated Baseline Reviews, Webinar, 24 May 2016Association for Project Management
 
Industrialengineeringpresentation
IndustrialengineeringpresentationIndustrialengineeringpresentation
IndustrialengineeringpresentationAliHasan202
 
General Counsel Taking Control
General Counsel Taking ControlGeneral Counsel Taking Control
General Counsel Taking ControlPaul Taylor
 
Bpr Presentation 21 Nov
Bpr Presentation 21 NovBpr Presentation 21 Nov
Bpr Presentation 21 Novmalonema
 
Bpr Presentation 21 Nov
Bpr Presentation 21 NovBpr Presentation 21 Nov
Bpr Presentation 21 Novmalonema
 
Taking Back Your Manufacturing Plant Through Continuous Improvement
Taking Back Your Manufacturing Plant Through Continuous Improvement Taking Back Your Manufacturing Plant Through Continuous Improvement
Taking Back Your Manufacturing Plant Through Continuous Improvement Frank Donohue
 
krm_om10_ch01_ge.pptx
krm_om10_ch01_ge.pptxkrm_om10_ch01_ge.pptx
krm_om10_ch01_ge.pptxesra170752
 
Relocation of Us headquarters Technology firmJi Pete.docx
Relocation of Us headquarters Technology firmJi Pete.docxRelocation of Us headquarters Technology firmJi Pete.docx
Relocation of Us headquarters Technology firmJi Pete.docxcarlt4
 
Relocation of Us headquarters Technology firmJi Pete.docx
Relocation of Us headquarters Technology firmJi Pete.docxRelocation of Us headquarters Technology firmJi Pete.docx
Relocation of Us headquarters Technology firmJi Pete.docxdebishakespeare
 

Similar to EBN Forum Sept 2016 A_Better_Selection_Presentation (20)

build-for-speed-brochure
build-for-speed-brochurebuild-for-speed-brochure
build-for-speed-brochure
 
Running Head EVALUATION1EVALUATION 2.docx
Running Head EVALUATION1EVALUATION 2.docxRunning Head EVALUATION1EVALUATION 2.docx
Running Head EVALUATION1EVALUATION 2.docx
 
RMCO Proposal
RMCO ProposalRMCO Proposal
RMCO Proposal
 
WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE .docx
WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE                                          .docxWORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE                                          .docx
WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE .docx
 
Lean pilots by Mariya Breyter from Dun & Bradstreet
Lean pilots by Mariya Breyter from Dun & BradstreetLean pilots by Mariya Breyter from Dun & Bradstreet
Lean pilots by Mariya Breyter from Dun & Bradstreet
 
Setting Sail to Success.pdf
Setting Sail to Success.pdfSetting Sail to Success.pdf
Setting Sail to Success.pdf
 
Vendor Selection Case Study
Vendor Selection Case Study Vendor Selection Case Study
Vendor Selection Case Study
 
Practical approaches to address government contracting problems
Practical approaches to address government contracting problemsPractical approaches to address government contracting problems
Practical approaches to address government contracting problems
 
Strategic service initiatives
Strategic service initiativesStrategic service initiatives
Strategic service initiatives
 
A guide to conducting Integrated Baseline Reviews, Webinar, 24 May 2016
A guide to conducting Integrated Baseline Reviews, Webinar, 24 May 2016A guide to conducting Integrated Baseline Reviews, Webinar, 24 May 2016
A guide to conducting Integrated Baseline Reviews, Webinar, 24 May 2016
 
Industrialengineeringpresentation
IndustrialengineeringpresentationIndustrialengineeringpresentation
Industrialengineeringpresentation
 
PMP® Sample Questions 3
PMP® Sample Questions 3PMP® Sample Questions 3
PMP® Sample Questions 3
 
General Counsel Taking Control
General Counsel Taking ControlGeneral Counsel Taking Control
General Counsel Taking Control
 
Bpr Presentation 21 Nov
Bpr Presentation 21 NovBpr Presentation 21 Nov
Bpr Presentation 21 Nov
 
Bpr Presentation 21 Nov
Bpr Presentation 21 NovBpr Presentation 21 Nov
Bpr Presentation 21 Nov
 
Taking Back Your Manufacturing Plant Through Continuous Improvement
Taking Back Your Manufacturing Plant Through Continuous Improvement Taking Back Your Manufacturing Plant Through Continuous Improvement
Taking Back Your Manufacturing Plant Through Continuous Improvement
 
krm_om10_ch01_ge.pptx
krm_om10_ch01_ge.pptxkrm_om10_ch01_ge.pptx
krm_om10_ch01_ge.pptx
 
BPR ppt.pptx
BPR ppt.pptxBPR ppt.pptx
BPR ppt.pptx
 
Relocation of Us headquarters Technology firmJi Pete.docx
Relocation of Us headquarters Technology firmJi Pete.docxRelocation of Us headquarters Technology firmJi Pete.docx
Relocation of Us headquarters Technology firmJi Pete.docx
 
Relocation of Us headquarters Technology firmJi Pete.docx
Relocation of Us headquarters Technology firmJi Pete.docxRelocation of Us headquarters Technology firmJi Pete.docx
Relocation of Us headquarters Technology firmJi Pete.docx
 

EBN Forum Sept 2016 A_Better_Selection_Presentation

  • 1. Rob J. Thurston – HR Consulting Group Matt Gabrielson – Connect Your Benefits
  • 2. Using plain language for employers, benefits consultants and brokers. Review a proven process to evaluate, interview, compare and select vendors using less time and fewer resources. Today’s Presentation
  • 3. Review a case study demonstrating how Boeing used this process to find a high-quality vendor and boost employee engagement. Learn how working with an expert during vendor selection makes life easier on your organization. Today’s Presentation
  • 4. Outdated vendor selection processes lead to scope creep, unexpected costs and poor outcomes. Request for Proposal (RFP) bid processes are time-consuming and expensive. Outdated Vendor Selection Processes
  • 5. Expensive delays and inadequate resource allocation during implementation with new vendors. Desired ROI not consistently achieved due to poor planning and/or execution. Outdated Vendor Selection Processes
  • 6. Unnecessary stress due to improper vendor selection or process challenges. Unforeseen costs not identified in a RFP method. Outdated Vendor Selection Processes
  • 7. New Product Paradigmism Vision Time Objective Match your time constraints with the scope of the project, with the resources available.
  • 8. Optimal Vendor Selection Process 1. Planning 2. Selection 3. Execution 4. Refinement
  • 9. Phase 1: Planning 1. Planning 2. Selection 3. Execution 4. Refinement Planning 1. Define requirements & desired ROI 2. Obtain initial buy-in from management 3. Conduct feasibility study & cost/benefit analysis 4. Get final buy-in from management
  • 10. Phase 2: Selection Selection 1. Evaluate potential vendors:  Best fit with needs  Strength of references  Responsiveness of vendor  Implementation time and cost 2. Make final selection based on Vendor Query Response (VQR) 1. Planning 2. Selection 3. Execution 4. Refinement
  • 11. Phase 3: Execution Execution 1. Establish milestones 2. Deliver effective training to all program leaders and end users 3. Scale program realistically 1. Planning 2. Selection 3. Execution 4. Refinement
  • 12. Phase 4: Refinement Refinement 1. Performance metrics to measure ROI 2. Adjust messaging to boost employee participation 3. Embrace beneficial process and technology changes 1. Planning 2. Selection 3. Execution 4. Refinement
  • 13. Company: Boeing, the world’s largest aerospace company, and leading manufacturer of commercial jetliners and defense, space and security systems. Case Study – Process In Action
  • 14. Challenge: Boeing wanted more ancillary benefits to recruit and retain employees, and to keep the entire workforce more engaged.  Home services promotions were identified as a common interest to its diverse workforce spread across 49 states. Case Study
  • 15. Planning: Boeing determined it needed voluntary benefits that:  Appealed to every employee  Were available to employees in every state  Minimal implementation time  Minimal training for HR staff  Not cost-prohibitive on a per-employee basis  Was a program exclusive to Boeing employees Case Study – Planning
  • 16. Selection: Boeing used a Vendor Query Response (VQR) to compare employee discount programs and services  Narrowed the field of potential vendors.  Investigated each vendor’s capacity, security, and process controls.  Selected Connect Your Home, an award-winning national home services retailer. Case Study – Selection
  • 17. Execution: Boeing established milestones for the execution process. 1. Assigned its HR staff to collaborate with the vendor. 2. Boeing worked with the vendor to set milestones for the project. Case Study – Execution
  • 18. 3. The vendor provided tailored marketing materials to promote the program to employees 4. The vendor created Boeing-branded landing pages 5. HR staff promoted the employee engagement ‘discount’ program it’s employee portals and internal communications Case Study – Execution
  • 19. Refinement: Boeing HR staff with the vendor finds new and creative ways to engage its workforce. 1. Additional home services have been added to the Boeing portal 2. Special promotions are changed to maintain relevance to Boeing employees Case Study – Refinement
  • 20. • Results: Boeing improved employee engagement with a home services discount provider. • New discount program offered to all 150,000 employees nationwide. • Low impact on HR staff with zero implementation or maintenance cost • Achieved its objective and cleared the path for impressive future ROI. • Implemented a valuable new tool in its effort to recruit and retain employees, and to keep the entire workforce more engaged. Case Study – Results
  • 21.  Helps HR and Benefits teams maintain their strategic focus  Ensures timely, cost-effective flow from planning through execution  Gives your organization a process template for quickly and easily expanding the benefits programs and technology you offer to employees  Ultimately improves your employee recruitment, retention and engagement as you add new incentives and technology Successful Vendor Selection
  • 22. Utilize vendors to provide industry knowledge, implementation specialists, and maximizing your time & resources.  Clear guidance in program planning and preparation  Faster, more streamlined implementation and setup  Customization of employee engagement tools  Ability to keep projects on time due to 24/7 work process  Uncompromising data security for client organization and end users Use Vendors As Your Multipliers
  • 23. Rob J. Thurston President HR Consulting Group 801-787-0416 hrcgpartners@gmail.com A Better Process – Q&A Matt Gabrielson President Connect Your Benefits 720-539-7516 matt@connectyourbenefits.com
  • 24.  Rob J. Thurston – HR Consulting Group  Matt Gabrielson – Connect Your Benefits Thank You For Attending