Uneak White's Personal Brand Exploration Presentation
PILOT STUDY RESULTS TURNAROUND - EDITED.pptx
1. PILOT STUDY RESULTS
TURNAROUND STRATEGIES AND
PERFORMANCE OF SELECTED
PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES IN KENYA
Nyanchama Janealtone Florence
HDB311-C007-0487/2018
2. Location of the Pilot Study
• The 33 respondents were be drawn from Embu University, Kirinyaga
University and The Cooperative University of Kenya which are outside
the rift valley region.
• The 33 respondents were supplied with questionnaires and 30 of
them returned the questionnaires
• The purpose of pre-testing was to aid in refining the content and
language used in the questionnaire.
• Calculation of the Cronbach’s Alpha test was computed to facilitate
the understanding of reliability and validity of the survey tool that will
be used to collect data (Mugenda & Mugenda, 2003).
3. Reliability Test Results
For diversification strategies the results were as follows:
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha Cronbach's Alpha Based on
Standardized Items
N of Items
.748 .763 4
4. Reliability Test for Operational Restructuring
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha Cronbach's Alpha Based on Standardized Items N of Items
.738 .757 5
5. Reliability Test Results for Management
Restructuring
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha Cronbach's Alpha Based on
Standardized Items
N of Items
.787 .842 5
6. Performance Reliability Test Results
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha Cronbach's Alpha Based on Standardized
Items
N of Items
.773 .822 4
7. Whole Instrument Reliability test
• Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was used to determine the reliability and
internal consistency of the 18-item Turnaround strategies and
performance.
• Therefore, the results indicate that scale has good reliability and
internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient = 0.762).
8. Reliability Statistics for the Whole Instrument
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha N of Items
.720 18
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Item
Deleted
Scale Variance if Item
Deleted
Corrected Item-Total
Correlation
Cronbach's Alpha if
Item Deleted
Operational 8.0545 2.754 .007 .738
Management 8.0909 1.807 .651 . 787
Diversitication 8.3273 1.489 .301 . 748
Perfomance 8.1455 1.878 .501 . 773
9. Interpretation of reliability coefficient
• Interpret the reliability coefficient to provide insight into the reliability
of the measure.
• A higher coefficient indicates greater internal consistency or
reliability. The following general guidelines for interpretation are
used:
• Alpha coefficient values between 0.70 and 0.80 are considered
acceptable.
• Values above 0.80 indicate good reliability.
• Values below 0.70 may suggest lower reliability and may require
further investigation or refinement of the measure.
10. DIAGNOSTIC TESTS
Multicolineality Test
Coefficientsa
Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized
Coefficients
t Sig. Collinearity Statistics
B Std. Error Beta Tolerance variance
inflation
factor (VIF)
1
(Constant) 1.414 .430 3.290 .003
Operational -.475 .131 -.427 -3.617 .001 .825 1.212
Management .860 .135 .784 6.371 .000 .760 1.316
Diversitication .101 .074 .159 1.378 .179 .866 1.155
a. Dependent Variable: Perfomance
11. Interpretation
• The variance inflation factor (VIF) values indicated for the
predictor variables operational, management restructuring
and diversification,are above 1 and less that ten which shows
that there is no multicollinearity issues in the data (Ray-
Mukherjee et al., 2014).
13. Interpretation
• The scatter points are on the lower part of the scatter
plot indicating that there could be low correlation
between the variables.
• The distribution of the scatter points indicate the
assumptions of linearity and homoscedasticity are
adhered to and correlation test can be conducted.
15. Interpretation
• Since the sample is less than 50 then Shapiro Test is
appropriate
• If the Sig. value of the Shapiro-Wilk Test is greater than 0.05,
the data is normal. If it is below 0.05, the data significantly
deviate from a normal distribution.
• The Values of the variables are greater than 0.05 hence the
data is normally distributed
16. Conclusion
• Since the Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of the
variables are above .70 as recommended by then the
variables measure give a consistent reliable results.
• Similarly the overall Cronbach’s alpha coefficient is
0.762 which is higher than the recommended 0.70
threshold.
