Healthcare facilities should always practice safe patient handling practices to prevent unwanted injuries. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/safepatient/
Design Requirements For a Tendon Rehabilitation Robot: Results From a Survey ...ertekg
Download Link > https://ertekprojects.com/gurdal-ertek-publications/blog/design-requirements-for-a-tendon-rehabilitation-robot-results-from-a-survey-of-engineers-and-health-professionals/
Exoskeleton type finger rehabilitation robots are helpful in assisting the treatment of tendon injuries. A survey has been carried out with engineers and health professionals to further develop an existing finger exoskeleton prototype. The goal of the study is to better understand the relative importance of several design criteria through the analysis of survey results and to improve the finger exoskeleton accordingly. The survey questions with strong correlations are identified and the preferences of the two respondent groups are statistically compared. The results of the statistical analysis are interpreted and insights obtained are used to guide the design process. The answers to the qualitative questions are also discussed together with their design implications. Finally, Quality Function Deployment (QFD) has been employed for visualizing these functional requirements in relation to the customer requirements.
COMMENTARY–INVITEDRun, Hide, Fight,” or Secure, PreserveLynellBull52
COMMENTARY–INVITED
“Run, Hide, Fight,” or “Secure, Preserve,
Fight”: How Should Health Care
Professionals and Facilities Respond to
Active Shooter Incidents?
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) definesan active shooter as “an individual actively
engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a
confined and populated area.”1 A study of newspaper
articles and press releases identified 154 active shooter
incidents (ASIs) in hospitals in the United States in
the 12-year period 2000 through 2011.2 ASIs were
more common in larger hospitals, with 29% taking
place in the emergency department (ED) and 19% in
patient rooms. In 50% of the ASIs in an ED, the per-
petrator used a security officer’s gun.2
Current federal law enforcement guidelines recom-
mend “Run, Hide, Fight” as a stepwise response to
ASIs.3 A 2014 report issued jointly by the U.S.
Departments of Health and Human Services, Home-
land Security, and Justice; the FBI; and the Federal
Emergency Management Agency explicitly endorses
the “run, hide, fight” model for health care facilities.4
According to this strategy, one should first “run,” that
is, rapidly leave the area under attack and keep mov-
ing until one is in a safe location. If one cannot run
away, the next best option is to “hide” in as safe a
place as one can. This may include locking and barri-
cading doors and windows and remaining silent. In
the event one cannot run or hide, one should “fight”
when confronted, that is use force to disrupt or inca-
pacitate the shooter.
Law enforcement agencies endorse the “run, hide,
fight” strategy because research shows that it is the
most effective sequence of responses to protect individ-
uals during ASIs.5 Self-protection is certainly an
understandable and permissible reason for choosing a
particular action, but it is only one among a variety of
actions and reasons. Should the value of self-protec-
tion persuade health care facilities and individual
health care professionals to implement the “run, hide,
fight” response to ASIs?
In a 2018 article in the New England Journal of
Medicine, Inaba et al.6 agree that health care profes-
sionals, staff, patients, and visitors should follow the
“run, hide, fight” strategy in ASIs, provided that all
are able to take those actions. In other situations, how-
ever, these authors propose that health care facilities
and professionals consider a different response to
ASIs that they refer to as “secure, preserve, fight.”
They describe these specific health care situations and
their proposed response as follows: “for professionals
providing essential medical care to patients who can-
not run, hide, or fight owing to their medical condi-
tion or ongoing life-sustaining therapy, a different set
of responses should be considered—secure the loca-
tion immediately, preserve the life of the patient and
oneself [by continuing care that is required to preserve
life], and fight only if necessary.”6
Inaba et al. offer several reasons for their propos ...
Design Requirements For a Tendon Rehabilitation Robot: Results From a Survey ...ertekg
Download Link > https://ertekprojects.com/gurdal-ertek-publications/blog/design-requirements-for-a-tendon-rehabilitation-robot-results-from-a-survey-of-engineers-and-health-professionals/
Exoskeleton type finger rehabilitation robots are helpful in assisting the treatment of tendon injuries. A survey has been carried out with engineers and health professionals to further develop an existing finger exoskeleton prototype. The goal of the study is to better understand the relative importance of several design criteria through the analysis of survey results and to improve the finger exoskeleton accordingly. The survey questions with strong correlations are identified and the preferences of the two respondent groups are statistically compared. The results of the statistical analysis are interpreted and insights obtained are used to guide the design process. The answers to the qualitative questions are also discussed together with their design implications. Finally, Quality Function Deployment (QFD) has been employed for visualizing these functional requirements in relation to the customer requirements.
COMMENTARY–INVITEDRun, Hide, Fight,” or Secure, PreserveLynellBull52
COMMENTARY–INVITED
“Run, Hide, Fight,” or “Secure, Preserve,
Fight”: How Should Health Care
Professionals and Facilities Respond to
Active Shooter Incidents?
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) definesan active shooter as “an individual actively
engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a
confined and populated area.”1 A study of newspaper
articles and press releases identified 154 active shooter
incidents (ASIs) in hospitals in the United States in
the 12-year period 2000 through 2011.2 ASIs were
more common in larger hospitals, with 29% taking
place in the emergency department (ED) and 19% in
patient rooms. In 50% of the ASIs in an ED, the per-
petrator used a security officer’s gun.2
Current federal law enforcement guidelines recom-
mend “Run, Hide, Fight” as a stepwise response to
ASIs.3 A 2014 report issued jointly by the U.S.
Departments of Health and Human Services, Home-
land Security, and Justice; the FBI; and the Federal
Emergency Management Agency explicitly endorses
the “run, hide, fight” model for health care facilities.4
According to this strategy, one should first “run,” that
is, rapidly leave the area under attack and keep mov-
ing until one is in a safe location. If one cannot run
away, the next best option is to “hide” in as safe a
place as one can. This may include locking and barri-
cading doors and windows and remaining silent. In
the event one cannot run or hide, one should “fight”
when confronted, that is use force to disrupt or inca-
pacitate the shooter.
Law enforcement agencies endorse the “run, hide,
fight” strategy because research shows that it is the
most effective sequence of responses to protect individ-
uals during ASIs.5 Self-protection is certainly an
understandable and permissible reason for choosing a
particular action, but it is only one among a variety of
actions and reasons. Should the value of self-protec-
tion persuade health care facilities and individual
health care professionals to implement the “run, hide,
fight” response to ASIs?
In a 2018 article in the New England Journal of
Medicine, Inaba et al.6 agree that health care profes-
sionals, staff, patients, and visitors should follow the
“run, hide, fight” strategy in ASIs, provided that all
are able to take those actions. In other situations, how-
ever, these authors propose that health care facilities
and professionals consider a different response to
ASIs that they refer to as “secure, preserve, fight.”
They describe these specific health care situations and
their proposed response as follows: “for professionals
providing essential medical care to patients who can-
not run, hide, or fight owing to their medical condi-
tion or ongoing life-sustaining therapy, a different set
of responses should be considered—secure the loca-
tion immediately, preserve the life of the patient and
oneself [by continuing care that is required to preserve
life], and fight only if necessary.”6
Inaba et al. offer several reasons for their propos ...
January-February 2016 • Vol. 25/No. 1 17
CPT (R) Gwendolyn Godlock, MS-PSL, BSN, RN, AN, CPHQ, is Field Representative Nurse
Surveyor, The Joint Commission, Oakbrook, Terrace, IL.
CPT Mollie Christiansen, BSN, RN, AN, CMSRN, is Clinical Nurse Officer in Charge, Burn
Progressive Care Unit, United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, Joint Base San
Antonio Fort Sam Houston, TX.
COL Laura Feider, PhD, RN, is Dean, School of Nursing Science and Chief, Department of
Nursing Science, Army Medical Department Center and School, Health Readiness Center of
Excellence, Joint Base San Antonio Fort Sam Houston, TX.
Acknowledgments: The team would like to thank nursing leaders COL (R) Sheri Howell, for-
mer Deputy Commander of Nursing and Chief of Staff; and COL Richard Evans, Assistant
Deputy Chief Army Nurse Corps, for their support. A special acknowledgment for the former
Chief, Medical Nursing Section, COL Vivian Harris, who remained a staunch supporter, advo-
cate, and cheerleader, the Medical Section nursing staff, and the Center for Nursing Science
and Clinical Inquiry.
Note: The view(s) expressed herein are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy
or position of Brooke Army Medical Center, the U.S. Army Medical Department, the U.S. Army
Office of the Surgeon General, the Department of the Army, Department of Defense, or the U.S.
Government.
Implementation of an Evidence-Based
Patient Safety Team to Prevent Falls
in Inpatient Medical Units
T
he Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services identified
falls as a preventable health
care acquired condition (DuPree,
Fritz-Campiz, & Musheno, 2014). A
large portion of the medical-surgical
inpatient population is aging, and
therefore at high risk for falls (Boltz,
Capezuti, Wagner, Rosen berg, &
Secic, 2013). Falls have physical and
emotional implications for patients,
as well as increased financial costs for
facilities. Nationally, medical units
have the highest rates of falls
(Bouldin et al., 2013). Most notably,
falls can cause significant injuries
resulting in increased length of stay,
unexpected surgeries, and even death
(Williams, Szekendi, & Thomas,
2014). Historically medical-surgical
nurses care for a mix of complex
patients with an array of comorbidi-
ties and patient needs (Carter &
Burnette, 2011).
Literature Review
The literature search was limited
to keyword searches on falls, team-
work, patient safety, nursing, hourly
rounding, and communication. Data -
bases included PubMed, EBSCO,
Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality, CINAHL, and The Joint
Commission for years 2008-2014.
Use of fall prevention teams was an
emerging evidence-based practice
(EBP) intervention to decrease the
incidence of inpatient falls (Graham,
2012). Consistently, the evidence
demonstrated ineffective communi-
cation, situation awareness, team-
work, assessment, hourly rounding,
and environmental challenges as key
factors related to preventable inpa-
tient falls.
Collectively, research.
30 Volume 82 • Number 1A D V A N C E M E N T O F T H E .docxlorainedeserre
30 Volume 82 • Number 1
A D V A N C E M E N T O F T H E PRACTICEA D V A N C E M E N T O F T H E PRACTICE
D I R E C T F R O M C D C E N V I R O N M E N T A L H E A L T H S E R V I C E S
I ntroductionEmergency response and recovery work-ers might be exposed to multiple hazard-
ous conditions and stressful work environ-
ments when responding to a public health
emergency. Previous emergency events have
demonstrated that significant gaps and defi-
ciencies in responder health and safety con-
tinue to exist (Michaels & Howard 2012,
Newman, 2012). Ensuring the health and
safety of emergency response and recovery
workers who might be exposed to hazardous
conditions and stressful work environments
when responding to a public health emer-
gency should remain a top priority (Kitt et al.,
2011). The National Response Framework
contains a Worker Safety and Health Annex
detailing responsibilities for safety and health
during major emergencies, including roles
for the National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH) such as exposure
assessment and personal protective equip-
ment determination.
The NIOSH Emergency Preparedness
and Response (EPR) Program was created
in 2002 following the events of 9/11, which
included attacks on the World Trade Center
and Pentagon, and the anthrax letter terrorist
attacks. The goal of the NIOSH EPR Program
is to coordinate emergency preparedness
and response within NIOSH and improve
NIOSH’s ability to respond to future emergen-
cies and disasters. The NIOSH EPR Program
protects the health and safety of emergency
response and recovery workers through the
advancement of research and collaborations
to prevent diseases, injuries, and fatalities in
anticipation of and during responses to natu-
ral and human-induced disasters and novel
emergent events.
The NIOSH EPR Program participates in
response planning at the local, state, national,
and international levels to ensure the timely
identification of health hazards associated
with emergency responses and implementa-
tion of adequate protection measures; support
the Centers for Disease Control and Preven-
tion’s (CDC) emergency response efforts; and
use the Disaster Science Responder Research
Program to identify research needs to protect
emergency response and recovery workers
while identifying solutions to rapidly support
research during emergencies. Training for
emergency response and recovery workers is
an integral part of the NIOSH EPR Program.
This column highlights the NIOSH EPR Pro-
gram training opportunities and activities.
E d i t o r ’s N o t e : NEHA strives to provide up-to-date and relevant
information on environmental health and to build partnerships in the
profession. In pursuit of these goals, we feature this column on environmental
health services from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
in every issue of the Journal.
In these columns, authors from CDC’s Water, Fo ...
30 Volume 82 • Number 1A D V A N C E M E N T O F T H E .docxBHANU281672
30 Volume 82 • Number 1
A D V A N C E M E N T O F T H E PRACTICEA D V A N C E M E N T O F T H E PRACTICE
D I R E C T F R O M C D C E N V I R O N M E N T A L H E A L T H S E R V I C E S
I ntroductionEmergency response and recovery work-ers might be exposed to multiple hazard-
ous conditions and stressful work environ-
ments when responding to a public health
emergency. Previous emergency events have
demonstrated that significant gaps and defi-
ciencies in responder health and safety con-
tinue to exist (Michaels & Howard 2012,
Newman, 2012). Ensuring the health and
safety of emergency response and recovery
workers who might be exposed to hazardous
conditions and stressful work environments
when responding to a public health emer-
gency should remain a top priority (Kitt et al.,
2011). The National Response Framework
contains a Worker Safety and Health Annex
detailing responsibilities for safety and health
during major emergencies, including roles
for the National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH) such as exposure
assessment and personal protective equip-
ment determination.
The NIOSH Emergency Preparedness
and Response (EPR) Program was created
in 2002 following the events of 9/11, which
included attacks on the World Trade Center
and Pentagon, and the anthrax letter terrorist
attacks. The goal of the NIOSH EPR Program
is to coordinate emergency preparedness
and response within NIOSH and improve
NIOSH’s ability to respond to future emergen-
cies and disasters. The NIOSH EPR Program
protects the health and safety of emergency
response and recovery workers through the
advancement of research and collaborations
to prevent diseases, injuries, and fatalities in
anticipation of and during responses to natu-
ral and human-induced disasters and novel
emergent events.
The NIOSH EPR Program participates in
response planning at the local, state, national,
and international levels to ensure the timely
identification of health hazards associated
with emergency responses and implementa-
tion of adequate protection measures; support
the Centers for Disease Control and Preven-
tion’s (CDC) emergency response efforts; and
use the Disaster Science Responder Research
Program to identify research needs to protect
emergency response and recovery workers
while identifying solutions to rapidly support
research during emergencies. Training for
emergency response and recovery workers is
an integral part of the NIOSH EPR Program.
This column highlights the NIOSH EPR Pro-
gram training opportunities and activities.
E d i t o r ’s N o t e : NEHA strives to provide up-to-date and relevant
information on environmental health and to build partnerships in the
profession. In pursuit of these goals, we feature this column on environmental
health services from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
in every issue of the Journal.
In these columns, authors from CDC’s Water, Fo.
Student ProfileThe student profile will serve as an introduction.docxorlandov3
Student Profile
The student profile will serve as an introduction of the student to the Professor.
In a double spaced, one page essay, please tell me about your academic background, major, career goals, favorite subjects, learning style (visual/audio learner), etc. Add anything else that you think would be pertinent for a new professor to know about you before taking this class.
_____________________________________________________________________________
Essay Writing Rules:
When writing these essays, please refer to the fatal writing flaws included below. Late papers will never be accepted. You have plenty of warning on when the papers are due, so take into the account the possibility of an emergency and get it done early. For example, your internet being down at the time it is due is NOT a valid excuse. Each essay carries 15 points and only 3 best will be counted into your final grade. Fatal Writing Flaws
In grading writing submissions, when the “fifth” of any combination of the “flaws” listed below is reached, your paper will be returned with a failing grade. You are strongly encouraged to use the ReWrite Connection on campus to help prevent committing these writing mistakes.
1. Subject/Verb Agreement
2. Rambling/Run-On Sentences
3. Grammatical Errors
4. Poor Sentence Structure
5. Pervasive Spelling Errors (more than a couple typos)
6. Informal or Inappropriate Language
7. No Conclusion
July/August 2015 Corrections Today — 41
Kerry Kuehl, M.D., Dr.P.H., was the lead investigator
in the NIOSH-funded “Safety and Health Improve-
ment: Enhancing Law Enforcement Departments”
study,7 which established an evidence-based safety
and health program for municipal and county law
enforcement officers. It was natural to extend that
work to COs. An initial step compared survey find-
ings from COs at prisons of different security levels
in an effort to characterize staff and use that informa-
tion to match facilities in a prospective trial of a pro-
gram to improve COs’ TWH. Despite similar years on
the job across sites, stress levels, body weight, alco-
hol intake and sick days all increased as the security
level intensified. However, even at the minimum-
security sites, COs had higher body weights and
more cardiovascular risk factors than the average
police officer. Findings pointed to a gradient of
increasing stress relating to greater health problems.
Tim Morse, Ph.D., and colleagues from the Cen-
ter for Promoting Health in the New England Work-
place (CPH-NEW) used surveys, focus groups and
physical assessments to understand the health of
COs from two prisons.8 Morse and his colleagues
found COs had more obesity than the U.S. aver-
age. Only 15 percent of COs were in the normal
weight range, about half what is found in the gen-
eral adult population. The COs’ interview data was
remarkable for findings of stress relating to poor
dietary habits and barriers to regular exercise.
Kuehl’s subsequent study among .
“Multi-Purpose Manually Operated Cart” is a cart which is designed ergonomically to improve the working conditions of laborers and workers at
construction sites, factories, ports, railway stations, etc. The main objective is to prevent various occupational hazards and improve the quality of life for
workers everywhere. The simple, durable, light weight and cost effective carrier is intended to reduce the pressure put on the spine when load is carried
on the head. There is also a good hand grip which reduces stress on the spine when load is carried on the back or while pushing a cart. In due course of
our study we analyzed working condition of laborers and people living around our city, usually they carry goods or materials on their head, back,
shoulders which make the task more difficult for them and they are more prone to injuries thereby aroused the need of an ergonomic push cart which
would help them to carry materials easy and without injuries. The easily usable carrier, made up of cane which underwent bending process for giving it a
designed shape. This cane structure weighs 1 kg which is provided with cushions and belt. The main objective of the design is to prevent various
occupational hazards and improve the quality of life of the laborer. This product will help them in their work. The carrier can be used into three different
forms. This allows the user to carry lighter loads on the head, medium loads at the back and heavier loads on a trolley. Ergonomically the load is
distributed on the shoulder and at the lumber support by softer material.
January-February 2016 • Vol. 25/No. 1 17
CPT (R) Gwendolyn Godlock, MS-PSL, BSN, RN, AN, CPHQ, is Field Representative Nurse
Surveyor, The Joint Commission, Oakbrook, Terrace, IL.
CPT Mollie Christiansen, BSN, RN, AN, CMSRN, is Clinical Nurse Officer in Charge, Burn
Progressive Care Unit, United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, Joint Base San
Antonio Fort Sam Houston, TX.
COL Laura Feider, PhD, RN, is Dean, School of Nursing Science and Chief, Department of
Nursing Science, Army Medical Department Center and School, Health Readiness Center of
Excellence, Joint Base San Antonio Fort Sam Houston, TX.
Acknowledgments: The team would like to thank nursing leaders COL (R) Sheri Howell, for-
mer Deputy Commander of Nursing and Chief of Staff; and COL Richard Evans, Assistant
Deputy Chief Army Nurse Corps, for their support. A special acknowledgment for the former
Chief, Medical Nursing Section, COL Vivian Harris, who remained a staunch supporter, advo-
cate, and cheerleader, the Medical Section nursing staff, and the Center for Nursing Science
and Clinical Inquiry.
Note: The view(s) expressed herein are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy
or position of Brooke Army Medical Center, the U.S. Army Medical Department, the U.S. Army
Office of the Surgeon General, the Department of the Army, Department of Defense, or the U.S.
Government.
Implementation of an Evidence-Based
Patient Safety Team to Prevent Falls
in Inpatient Medical Units
T
he Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services identified
falls as a preventable health
care acquired condition (DuPree,
Fritz-Campiz, & Musheno, 2014). A
large portion of the medical-surgical
inpatient population is aging, and
therefore at high risk for falls (Boltz,
Capezuti, Wagner, Rosen berg, &
Secic, 2013). Falls have physical and
emotional implications for patients,
as well as increased financial costs for
facilities. Nationally, medical units
have the highest rates of falls
(Bouldin et al., 2013). Most notably,
falls can cause significant injuries
resulting in increased length of stay,
unexpected surgeries, and even death
(Williams, Szekendi, & Thomas,
2014). Historically medical-surgical
nurses care for a mix of complex
patients with an array of comorbidi-
ties and patient needs (Carter &
Burnette, 2011).
Literature Review
The literature search was limited
to keyword searches on falls, team-
work, patient safety, nursing, hourly
rounding, and communication. Data -
bases included PubMed, EBSCO,
Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality, CINAHL, and The Joint
Commission for years 2008-2014.
Use of fall prevention teams was an
emerging evidence-based practice
(EBP) intervention to decrease the
incidence of inpatient falls (Graham,
2012). Consistently, the evidence
demonstrated ineffective communi-
cation, situation awareness, team-
work, assessment, hourly rounding,
and environmental challenges as key
factors related to preventable inpa-
tient falls.
Collectively, research.
30 Volume 82 • Number 1A D V A N C E M E N T O F T H E .docxlorainedeserre
30 Volume 82 • Number 1
A D V A N C E M E N T O F T H E PRACTICEA D V A N C E M E N T O F T H E PRACTICE
D I R E C T F R O M C D C E N V I R O N M E N T A L H E A L T H S E R V I C E S
I ntroductionEmergency response and recovery work-ers might be exposed to multiple hazard-
ous conditions and stressful work environ-
ments when responding to a public health
emergency. Previous emergency events have
demonstrated that significant gaps and defi-
ciencies in responder health and safety con-
tinue to exist (Michaels & Howard 2012,
Newman, 2012). Ensuring the health and
safety of emergency response and recovery
workers who might be exposed to hazardous
conditions and stressful work environments
when responding to a public health emer-
gency should remain a top priority (Kitt et al.,
2011). The National Response Framework
contains a Worker Safety and Health Annex
detailing responsibilities for safety and health
during major emergencies, including roles
for the National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH) such as exposure
assessment and personal protective equip-
ment determination.
The NIOSH Emergency Preparedness
and Response (EPR) Program was created
in 2002 following the events of 9/11, which
included attacks on the World Trade Center
and Pentagon, and the anthrax letter terrorist
attacks. The goal of the NIOSH EPR Program
is to coordinate emergency preparedness
and response within NIOSH and improve
NIOSH’s ability to respond to future emergen-
cies and disasters. The NIOSH EPR Program
protects the health and safety of emergency
response and recovery workers through the
advancement of research and collaborations
to prevent diseases, injuries, and fatalities in
anticipation of and during responses to natu-
ral and human-induced disasters and novel
emergent events.
The NIOSH EPR Program participates in
response planning at the local, state, national,
and international levels to ensure the timely
identification of health hazards associated
with emergency responses and implementa-
tion of adequate protection measures; support
the Centers for Disease Control and Preven-
tion’s (CDC) emergency response efforts; and
use the Disaster Science Responder Research
Program to identify research needs to protect
emergency response and recovery workers
while identifying solutions to rapidly support
research during emergencies. Training for
emergency response and recovery workers is
an integral part of the NIOSH EPR Program.
This column highlights the NIOSH EPR Pro-
gram training opportunities and activities.
E d i t o r ’s N o t e : NEHA strives to provide up-to-date and relevant
information on environmental health and to build partnerships in the
profession. In pursuit of these goals, we feature this column on environmental
health services from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
in every issue of the Journal.
In these columns, authors from CDC’s Water, Fo ...
30 Volume 82 • Number 1A D V A N C E M E N T O F T H E .docxBHANU281672
30 Volume 82 • Number 1
A D V A N C E M E N T O F T H E PRACTICEA D V A N C E M E N T O F T H E PRACTICE
D I R E C T F R O M C D C E N V I R O N M E N T A L H E A L T H S E R V I C E S
I ntroductionEmergency response and recovery work-ers might be exposed to multiple hazard-
ous conditions and stressful work environ-
ments when responding to a public health
emergency. Previous emergency events have
demonstrated that significant gaps and defi-
ciencies in responder health and safety con-
tinue to exist (Michaels & Howard 2012,
Newman, 2012). Ensuring the health and
safety of emergency response and recovery
workers who might be exposed to hazardous
conditions and stressful work environments
when responding to a public health emer-
gency should remain a top priority (Kitt et al.,
2011). The National Response Framework
contains a Worker Safety and Health Annex
detailing responsibilities for safety and health
during major emergencies, including roles
for the National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH) such as exposure
assessment and personal protective equip-
ment determination.
The NIOSH Emergency Preparedness
and Response (EPR) Program was created
in 2002 following the events of 9/11, which
included attacks on the World Trade Center
and Pentagon, and the anthrax letter terrorist
attacks. The goal of the NIOSH EPR Program
is to coordinate emergency preparedness
and response within NIOSH and improve
NIOSH’s ability to respond to future emergen-
cies and disasters. The NIOSH EPR Program
protects the health and safety of emergency
response and recovery workers through the
advancement of research and collaborations
to prevent diseases, injuries, and fatalities in
anticipation of and during responses to natu-
ral and human-induced disasters and novel
emergent events.
The NIOSH EPR Program participates in
response planning at the local, state, national,
and international levels to ensure the timely
identification of health hazards associated
with emergency responses and implementa-
tion of adequate protection measures; support
the Centers for Disease Control and Preven-
tion’s (CDC) emergency response efforts; and
use the Disaster Science Responder Research
Program to identify research needs to protect
emergency response and recovery workers
while identifying solutions to rapidly support
research during emergencies. Training for
emergency response and recovery workers is
an integral part of the NIOSH EPR Program.
This column highlights the NIOSH EPR Pro-
gram training opportunities and activities.
E d i t o r ’s N o t e : NEHA strives to provide up-to-date and relevant
information on environmental health and to build partnerships in the
profession. In pursuit of these goals, we feature this column on environmental
health services from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
in every issue of the Journal.
In these columns, authors from CDC’s Water, Fo.
Student ProfileThe student profile will serve as an introduction.docxorlandov3
Student Profile
The student profile will serve as an introduction of the student to the Professor.
In a double spaced, one page essay, please tell me about your academic background, major, career goals, favorite subjects, learning style (visual/audio learner), etc. Add anything else that you think would be pertinent for a new professor to know about you before taking this class.
_____________________________________________________________________________
Essay Writing Rules:
When writing these essays, please refer to the fatal writing flaws included below. Late papers will never be accepted. You have plenty of warning on when the papers are due, so take into the account the possibility of an emergency and get it done early. For example, your internet being down at the time it is due is NOT a valid excuse. Each essay carries 15 points and only 3 best will be counted into your final grade. Fatal Writing Flaws
In grading writing submissions, when the “fifth” of any combination of the “flaws” listed below is reached, your paper will be returned with a failing grade. You are strongly encouraged to use the ReWrite Connection on campus to help prevent committing these writing mistakes.
1. Subject/Verb Agreement
2. Rambling/Run-On Sentences
3. Grammatical Errors
4. Poor Sentence Structure
5. Pervasive Spelling Errors (more than a couple typos)
6. Informal or Inappropriate Language
7. No Conclusion
July/August 2015 Corrections Today — 41
Kerry Kuehl, M.D., Dr.P.H., was the lead investigator
in the NIOSH-funded “Safety and Health Improve-
ment: Enhancing Law Enforcement Departments”
study,7 which established an evidence-based safety
and health program for municipal and county law
enforcement officers. It was natural to extend that
work to COs. An initial step compared survey find-
ings from COs at prisons of different security levels
in an effort to characterize staff and use that informa-
tion to match facilities in a prospective trial of a pro-
gram to improve COs’ TWH. Despite similar years on
the job across sites, stress levels, body weight, alco-
hol intake and sick days all increased as the security
level intensified. However, even at the minimum-
security sites, COs had higher body weights and
more cardiovascular risk factors than the average
police officer. Findings pointed to a gradient of
increasing stress relating to greater health problems.
Tim Morse, Ph.D., and colleagues from the Cen-
ter for Promoting Health in the New England Work-
place (CPH-NEW) used surveys, focus groups and
physical assessments to understand the health of
COs from two prisons.8 Morse and his colleagues
found COs had more obesity than the U.S. aver-
age. Only 15 percent of COs were in the normal
weight range, about half what is found in the gen-
eral adult population. The COs’ interview data was
remarkable for findings of stress relating to poor
dietary habits and barriers to regular exercise.
Kuehl’s subsequent study among .
“Multi-Purpose Manually Operated Cart” is a cart which is designed ergonomically to improve the working conditions of laborers and workers at
construction sites, factories, ports, railway stations, etc. The main objective is to prevent various occupational hazards and improve the quality of life for
workers everywhere. The simple, durable, light weight and cost effective carrier is intended to reduce the pressure put on the spine when load is carried
on the head. There is also a good hand grip which reduces stress on the spine when load is carried on the back or while pushing a cart. In due course of
our study we analyzed working condition of laborers and people living around our city, usually they carry goods or materials on their head, back,
shoulders which make the task more difficult for them and they are more prone to injuries thereby aroused the need of an ergonomic push cart which
would help them to carry materials easy and without injuries. The easily usable carrier, made up of cane which underwent bending process for giving it a
designed shape. This cane structure weighs 1 kg which is provided with cushions and belt. The main objective of the design is to prevent various
occupational hazards and improve the quality of life of the laborer. This product will help them in their work. The carrier can be used into three different
forms. This allows the user to carry lighter loads on the head, medium loads at the back and heavier loads on a trolley. Ergonomically the load is
distributed on the shoulder and at the lumber support by softer material.
Premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions for Modern BusinessesSynapseIndia
Stay ahead of the curve with our premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions. Our expert developers utilize MongoDB, Express.js, AngularJS, and Node.js to create modern and responsive web applications. Trust us for cutting-edge solutions that drive your business growth and success.
Know more: https://www.synapseindia.com/technology/mean-stack-development-company.html
3.0 Project 2_ Developing My Brand Identity Kit.pptxtanyjahb
A personal brand exploration presentation summarizes an individual's unique qualities and goals, covering strengths, values, passions, and target audience. It helps individuals understand what makes them stand out, their desired image, and how they aim to achieve it.
Memorandum Of Association Constitution of Company.pptseri bangash
www.seribangash.com
A Memorandum of Association (MOA) is a legal document that outlines the fundamental principles and objectives upon which a company operates. It serves as the company's charter or constitution and defines the scope of its activities. Here's a detailed note on the MOA:
Contents of Memorandum of Association:
Name Clause: This clause states the name of the company, which should end with words like "Limited" or "Ltd." for a public limited company and "Private Limited" or "Pvt. Ltd." for a private limited company.
https://seribangash.com/article-of-association-is-legal-doc-of-company/
Registered Office Clause: It specifies the location where the company's registered office is situated. This office is where all official communications and notices are sent.
Objective Clause: This clause delineates the main objectives for which the company is formed. It's important to define these objectives clearly, as the company cannot undertake activities beyond those mentioned in this clause.
www.seribangash.com
Liability Clause: It outlines the extent of liability of the company's members. In the case of companies limited by shares, the liability of members is limited to the amount unpaid on their shares. For companies limited by guarantee, members' liability is limited to the amount they undertake to contribute if the company is wound up.
https://seribangash.com/promotors-is-person-conceived-formation-company/
Capital Clause: This clause specifies the authorized capital of the company, i.e., the maximum amount of share capital the company is authorized to issue. It also mentions the division of this capital into shares and their respective nominal value.
Association Clause: It simply states that the subscribers wish to form a company and agree to become members of it, in accordance with the terms of the MOA.
Importance of Memorandum of Association:
Legal Requirement: The MOA is a legal requirement for the formation of a company. It must be filed with the Registrar of Companies during the incorporation process.
Constitutional Document: It serves as the company's constitutional document, defining its scope, powers, and limitations.
Protection of Members: It protects the interests of the company's members by clearly defining the objectives and limiting their liability.
External Communication: It provides clarity to external parties, such as investors, creditors, and regulatory authorities, regarding the company's objectives and powers.
https://seribangash.com/difference-public-and-private-company-law/
Binding Authority: The company and its members are bound by the provisions of the MOA. Any action taken beyond its scope may be considered ultra vires (beyond the powers) of the company and therefore void.
Amendment of MOA:
While the MOA lays down the company's fundamental principles, it is not entirely immutable. It can be amended, but only under specific circumstances and in compliance with legal procedures. Amendments typically require shareholder
7 Benefits of Using Tradeasia’s Premium Paint Chemicalsjeffmilton96
Discover 7 compelling reasons to choose Tradeasia’s premium paint chemicals. Enhance your formulations with eco-friendly, high-performance ingredients. Ideal for all paint types.
Skye Residences | Extended Stay Residences Near Toronto Airportmarketingjdass
Experience unparalleled EXTENDED STAY and comfort at Skye Residences located just minutes from Toronto Airport. Discover sophisticated accommodations tailored for discerning travelers.
Website Link :
https://skyeresidences.com/
https://skyeresidences.com/about-us/
https://skyeresidences.com/gallery/
https://skyeresidences.com/rooms/
https://skyeresidences.com/near-by-attractions/
https://skyeresidences.com/commute/
https://skyeresidences.com/contact/
https://skyeresidences.com/queen-suite-with-sofa-bed/
https://skyeresidences.com/queen-suite-with-sofa-bed-and-balcony/
https://skyeresidences.com/queen-suite-with-sofa-bed-accessible/
https://skyeresidences.com/2-bedroom-deluxe-queen-suite-with-sofa-bed/
https://skyeresidences.com/2-bedroom-deluxe-king-queen-suite-with-sofa-bed/
https://skyeresidences.com/2-bedroom-deluxe-queen-suite-with-sofa-bed-accessible/
#Skye Residences Etobicoke, #Skye Residences Near Toronto Airport, #Skye Residences Toronto, #Skye Hotel Toronto, #Skye Hotel Near Toronto Airport, #Hotel Near Toronto Airport, #Near Toronto Airport Accommodation, #Suites Near Toronto Airport, #Etobicoke Suites Near Airport, #Hotel Near Toronto Pearson International Airport, #Toronto Airport Suite Rentals, #Pearson Airport Hotel Suites
It is therefore essential to employ other water sources, such as river water, for consumption by humans. Commercial RO Plant purifiers manufactured by Netsol Water are necessary because a different type of water is completely unsuitable for human consumption. Large-scale water filtration is accomplished with the assistance of a Noida-based commercial RO plant manufacturer i.e., Netsol Water. It supports several methods for getting rid of all kinds of contaminants in water.
Discover the innovative and creative projects that highlight my journey throu...dylandmeas
Discover the innovative and creative projects that highlight my journey through Full Sail University. Below, you’ll find a collection of my work showcasing my skills and expertise in digital marketing, event planning, and media production.
Business Valuation Principles for EntrepreneursBen Wann
This insightful presentation is designed to equip entrepreneurs with the essential knowledge and tools needed to accurately value their businesses. Understanding business valuation is crucial for making informed decisions, whether you're seeking investment, planning to sell, or simply want to gauge your company's worth.
BIS Hallmark Certificate for jewellery business in India.pdfAgile Regulatory
A BIS Hallmark is a certification mark from the Bureau of Indian Standards that guarantees the purity of gold and silver jewelry. An Agile Regulatory Consultant can assist in obtaining this hallmark by providing expert guidance, managing paperwork, and ensuring compliance with BIS standards efficiently and smoothly. To know more visit https://www.agileregulatory.com/service/bis-hallmark
Improving profitability for small businessBen Wann
In this comprehensive presentation, we will explore strategies and practical tips for enhancing profitability in small businesses. Tailored to meet the unique challenges faced by small enterprises, this session covers various aspects that directly impact the bottom line. Attendees will learn how to optimize operational efficiency, manage expenses, and increase revenue through innovative marketing and customer engagement techniques.
Personal Brand Statement:
As an Army veteran dedicated to lifelong learning, I bring a disciplined, strategic mindset to my pursuits. I am constantly expanding my knowledge to innovate and lead effectively. My journey is driven by a commitment to excellence, and to make a meaningful impact in the world.
Attending a job Interview for B1 and B2 Englsih learnersErika906060
It is a sample of an interview for a business english class for pre-intermediate and intermediate english students with emphasis on the speking ability.
Affordable Stationery Printing Services in Jaipur | Navpack n PrintNavpack & Print
Looking for professional printing services in Jaipur? Navpack n Print offers high-quality and affordable stationery printing for all your business needs. Stand out with custom stationery designs and fast turnaround times. Contact us today for a quote!
Explore our most comprehensive guide on lookback analysis at SafePaaS, covering access governance and how it can transform modern ERP audits. Browse now!
Buy Verified PayPal Account | Buy Google 5 Star Reviewsusawebmarket
Buy Verified PayPal Account
Looking to buy verified PayPal accounts? Discover 7 expert tips for safely purchasing a verified PayPal account in 2024. Ensure security and reliability for your transactions.
PayPal Services Features-
🟢 Email Access
🟢 Bank Added
🟢 Card Verified
🟢 Full SSN Provided
🟢 Phone Number Access
🟢 Driving License Copy
🟢 Fasted Delivery
Client Satisfaction is Our First priority. Our services is very appropriate to buy. We assume that the first-rate way to purchase our offerings is to order on the website. If you have any worry in our cooperation usually You can order us on Skype or Telegram.
24/7 Hours Reply/Please Contact
usawebmarketEmail: support@usawebmarket.com
Skype: usawebmarket
Telegram: @usawebmarket
WhatsApp: +1(218) 203-5951
USA WEB MARKET is the Best Verified PayPal, Payoneer, Cash App, Skrill, Neteller, Stripe Account and SEO, SMM Service provider.100%Satisfection granted.100% replacement Granted.
Putting the SPARK into Virtual Training.pptxCynthia Clay
This 60-minute webinar, sponsored by Adobe, was delivered for the Training Mag Network. It explored the five elements of SPARK: Storytelling, Purpose, Action, Relationships, and Kudos. Knowing how to tell a well-structured story is key to building long-term memory. Stating a clear purpose that doesn't take away from the discovery learning process is critical. Ensuring that people move from theory to practical application is imperative. Creating strong social learning is the key to commitment and engagement. Validating and affirming participants' comments is the way to create a positive learning environment.
Cdc safe patient handling and mobility (sphm) - niosh workplace safety and health topic
1. On This Page
Patient Handling HazardsPatient Handling Ergonomics
Patient Handling and the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation (RNLE)
“Limited Guidance” – Not “NIOSH Policy:” Caution regarding the 35 lb. LimitSources:
This web page contains links to multiple resources for further information on safe patient handling:
NIOSH PublicationsNIOSHTIC-2 Search
NIOSH Blogs about Safe Patient HandlingNIOSH Occupational Health Safety Network (OHSN)
Other ResourcesUpcoming ConferencesNational Safe Patient Handling Standards
Safe Patient Handling Program Implementation: Free Tools and Resources from The Veterans Health
Administration (VHA)
Safe Patient Handling Legislation in the USA
(/niosh/index.htm)
Safe Patient Handling and Mobility (SPHM)
Patient Handling Hazards
Rates of musculoskeletal injuries from overexertion in healthcare occupations are among the highest of all U.S.
industries. Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) show that in 2014, the rate of overexertion injuries
averaged across all industries was 33 per 10,000 full time workers. By comparison, the overexertion injury rate for
hospital workers was twice the average (68 per 10,000), the rate for nursing home workers was over three times
2. the average (107 per 10,000), and the rate for ambulance workers was over five times the average (174 per
10,000). The single greatest risk factor for overexertion injuries in healthcare workers is the manual lifting,
moving and repositioning of patients, residents or clients, i.e., manual patient handling.
Patient Handling Ergonomics
Occupational safety and health programs have fostered research to identify injury risk factors and safety
interventions to prevent injuries during patient handling. Evidence-based research has shown that safe patient
handling interventions can significantly reduce overexertion injuries by replacing manual patient handling with
safer methods guided by the principles of “Ergonomics.” Ergonomics refers to the design of work tasks to best suit
the capabilities of workers. In the case of patient handling, it involves the use of mechanical equipment and safety
procedures to lift and move patients so that health care workers can avoid using manual exertions and thereby
reduce their risk of injury. At the same time, patient handling ergonomics seeks to maximize the safety and comfort
of patients during handling.
Patient Handling and the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation (RNLE)
One question that has been raised about patient handling is, “How much weight can be safely lifted without using
assistive equipment?” When it comes to questions about lifting, many safety professionals rely on the Revised
NIOSH Lifting Equation (https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/94-110/pdfs/94-110.pdf) (RNLE). NIOSH
researchers developed the RNLE to determine weight limits for preventing back injuries caused by manually lifting
objects on the job. Research studies have validated the equation’s usefulness for computing safe weight limits
when lifting inanimate objects such as boxes and other packages. As a matter of policy, NIOSH recommends its use
for that purpose.
The RNLE is not intended to be used for determining safe weight limits when lifting people. The shape and size of
the human body differ from person to person, and patient handling situations are often complicated by many other
factors such as the potential for unpredictable movements, the patient’s medical condition, and so on. Since the
equation was designed to be used for more stable and predictable lifting tasks, it is generally considered to be
impractical for patient handling tasks.
As the field of safe patient handling grew over the years, practitioners increasingly expressed interest in trying to
determine how much weight can be lifted safely using manual methods, and how much weight requires using lifting
equipment. Dr. Thomas Waters examined the issue further and published an article entitled, “When is it Safe to
Manually Lift a Patient?” (http://www.asphp.org/wp-
content/uploads/2011/05/When_Is_It_Safe_To_Manually_Lift_A_Patient.pdf) . The article describes how the
RNLE “can be used to calculate a recommended weight limit for a limited range of patient-handling tasks in which
the patient is cooperative and unlikely to move suddenly during the task.”
When lifting a box or other inanimate object, the lifter can usually get quite close to the object, which helps
minimize strain caused by reaching while lifting. It is usually not possible to get as close when lifting a patient. In
order to accommodate the added space needed when lifting a person, Dr. Waters increased the equation’s
minimum horizontal distance of 10 inches (between the lifter’s spine and the object) to 14.5 inches (between the
1
2
3. lifter’s spine and the patient). After including this change in the equation, he applied the RNLE and determined that
under the assumption of an otherwise “ideal” patient handling situation, the maximum recommended weight limit
is 35 lbs.
Based on Dr. Waters’ calculation, lifting algorithms developed by the Veterans’ Health Administration and the
Association of periOperative Nurses state that assistive equipment should be used if the weight to be lifted by any
single person exceeds 35 lbs. However, the guidance provided along with the algorithms advises that the 35 lb. limit
is not, by itself, sufficiently protective under all circumstances. As explained below, assistive devices are still needed
in most situations, even when the weight to be lifted is less than 35 lb.
“Limited Guidance” – Not “NIOSH Policy:” Caution regarding the 35 lb. Limit
When Dr. Waters derived 35 lb. as the maximum acceptable weight for manual patient handling, his calculation
assumed the most ideal, low-risk situation for lifting a person. In his article, “When is it Safe to Manually Lift a
Patient?” (http://www.asphp.org/wp-
content/uploads/2011/05/When_Is_It_Safe_To_Manually_Lift_A_Patient.pdf) he cautioned that even when the
patient is cooperative, many conditions reduce the weight limit even further. These include “lifting with extended
arms, lifting when near the floor, lifting when sitting or kneeling, lifting with the trunk twisted or the load off to the
side of the body, lifting with one hand or in a restricted space, or lifting during a shift lasting longer than eight
hours.” Most patient handling tasks occur under one or more of these circumstances, and certain physical/medical
conditions can compromise the patient’s safety during manual handling. Clearly, the majority of patient handling
situations are far less than ideal, thus NIOSH cannot designate 35 lb, nor any other weight, as a protective
“exposure limit” for patient handling. Instead, NIOSH shares in the consensus among patient handling professionals
that the goal of safe patient handling programs should be to eliminate all manual lifting whenever possible.
Sources:
1 BLS Table R8. Incidence rates for nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses involving days away from work per
10,000 full-time workers by industry and selected events or exposures leading to injury or illness, private industry,
2014. (http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/case/ostb4374.pdf)
2 Waters, T., Putz-Anderson, V., Fine, L. [1993]. Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual
lifting tasks. Ergonomics, 36, 749-776.
Please Note: A Special Section entitled “Impact of Thomas Waters on the Field of Ergonomics,” has been published
in Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, August 2016 58:665-795. View the
Preface to the Special Section (http://hfs.sagepub.com/content/58/5/665.full.pdf) .
This web page contains links to multiple resources for further information on safe patient
handling:
NIOSH Health Care and Social Assistance Program (HCSA) and the National Occupational Research Agenda
(NORA)
4. “Healthcare and Social Assistance” (HCSA) is one of many occupational sectors studied by U.S. federal agencies
such as the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).Guided by NORA-identified research priorities, the
mission of the NIOSH HCSA research program is to eliminate occupational diseases, injuries, and fatalities among
workers in this sector.Much of this research focuses on safe patient handling.
Collaboration among partners in government, industry, and academia has provided a great deal of information on
safe patient handling through publications, conferences, and safety training programs.To date, most of the research
has focused on the handling of “average-sized” patients in institutional settings such as hospitals and nursing
homes. Continued research in these and other settings such as home health care and emergency response, and
with obese and morbidly obese (“bariatric”) patients is needed.The research-based evidence gathered thus far has
led to the development of safe patient handling standards, and ongoing legislation to enact laws requiring or
promoting the use of safe patient handling programs in health care settings.
You can use the links and references shown below to find more information on publications, injury data
networking, conferences, training programs, standards, and legislation on safe patient handling.
NIOSH Publications
Safe Lifting and Movement of Nursing Home Residents
DHHS (NIOSH) Publication Number 2006-117 (February 2006)
State of the Sector Healthcare and Social Assistance Identification of Research Opportunities for the Next Decade
of NORA
Chapter 11: Musculoskeletal Disorders and Ergonomic Issues
DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2009-139 (June 2009)
NIOSH Hazard Review: Occupational Hazards in Home Healthcare
Chapter 2: Musculoskeletal Disorders and Ergonomic Interventions
DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2010-125 (January 2010)
Safe Patient Handling Training for Schools of Nursing
DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2009-127 (March 2010)
NIOSH fast facts: home healthcare workers – how to prevent musculoskeletal disorders
DHHS (NIOSH) Publication Number 2012-120 (February 2012)
NIOSHTIC-2 Search
NIOSHTIC-2 (http://www2a.cdc.gov/nioshtic-2/) is a searchable bibliographic database of occupational safety and
health publications, documents, grant reports, and journal articles supported in whole or in part by NIOSH.
View search results on Safe Patient Handling (http://www2a.cdc.gov/nioshtic-2/BuildQyr.asp?
s1=%27patient+handling%27&f1=*&t1=1&s2=%27patient+lift*%27&f2=*&t2=1&s3=%27lift*+patient*%27&f3=*
&t3=1&s4=%27handl*+patient*%27&f4=*&t4=1&s5=lift*+and+patient*&f5=TI&terms=5&Adv=1&n=new&View=
b&Startyear=&EndYear=&whichdate=DP&D1=10&Limit=500&Sort=DP+DESC&ct=&B1=Search)
5. NIOSH Blogs about Safe Patient Handling
Prevention of Back Injuries in Healthcare Settings (http://blogs.cdc.gov/niosh-science-blog/?p=158)
Strains, Sprains and Pains in Home Healthcare: Working in an Uncontrolled Environment
(http://blogs.cdc.gov/niosh-science-blog/2010/04/16/homehealthcare/)
NIOSH Occupational Health Safety Network (OHSN)
The OHSN is a secure electronic surveillance system designed to promote analysis and benchmarking of existing
occupational health data to prevent injury and illness among healthcare workers. Occupational health staff and
workplace safety managers can use OHSN Tools to convert data to OHSN format, then upload without worker
identifiers to the secure web portal. Current modules focus on traumatic injuries among healthcare workers
including musculoskeletal injuries from patient handling events; slips, trips, and falls; and workplace violence.
Other Resources
American Association for Safe Patient Handling and Movement (AASPHM) (http://aasphm.org/)
AASPHM: Healthcare Recipient Sling and Lift Hanger Bar Compatibility Guidelines (http://aasphm.org/wp-
content/uploads/AASPHM-Sling-Hanger-Bar-Guidelines-2016.pdf)
International Journal of Safe Patient Handling & Mobility (http://www.americanjournalofsphm.com/) (formerly
the American Journal of Safe Patient Handling & Movement)
American Nurses Association (ANA) Safe Patient Handling and Mobility (http://www.anasphm.org/)
Association of Occupational Health Professionals in Healthcare (AOHP) Resource Guide
(http://aohp.org/aohp/Portals/0/Documents/ToolsForYourWork/free_publications/Beyond%20Getting%20Starte
d%20Safe%20Patient%20Handling%20-%20May%202014.pdf.pdf)
Association of periOperative Nurses (AORN) (http://www.aorn.org/)
Association of Safe Patient Handling Professionals (ASPHP) (http://www.asphp.org/)
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Worker Safety in Hospitals: Safe Patient Handling
(https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hospitals/patient_handling.html)
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Ergonomics: Guidelines for Nursing Homes
(https://www.osha.gov/ergonomics/guidelines/nursinghome/index.html)
Safe Patient Handling in Washington State (http://www.washingtonsafepatienthandling.org/)
Upcoming Conferences
2 National Bariatric SPHM Conference, September 14-15, 2017, Austin, TX.
http://bariatricsphmconference.com/ (http://bariatricsphmconference.com/)
Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care 2018 International Symposium, March 26-28, 2018, Boston
Marriott Copley Place Hotel, Boston, MA
nd
6. https://www.hfes.org/web/HFESMeetings/2018HCSCallforproposals.html
(https://www.hfes.org/web/HFESMeetings/2018HCSCallforproposals.html)
2018 Safe Patient Handling & Mobility/Falls Conference: Featuring content on Mobility-related Adverse
Events, April 16-20, 2018, Rosen Centre, Orlando, FL
http://www.tampavaref.org/conferences.ht (http://www.tampavaref.org/conferences.htm)
1 International Conference on Safe Patient Handling and Mobility, September 5-7, 2018, Hyatt Regency,
Atlanta, GA
https://sphmjournal.com/save-date-1st-international-sphm-conference-september-5-7-2018/
(https://sphmjournal.com/save-date-1st-international-sphm-conference-september-5-7-2018/)
National Safe Patient Handling Standards
One of the goals established by the NORA Healthcare and Social Assistance (HCSA) Sector Council was for
organizations to establish national standards to guide a reduction in musculoskeletal disorders in healthcare
workers. The American Nurses Association (ANA) facilitated this effort with several Council members and other
interprofessional national subject matter experts, reaching across the continuum of care. On June 26, 2013, ANA
released Safe Patient Handling and Mobility Interprofessional National Standards (http://www.anasphm.org/) .
For more information about the NORA HCSA Sector Council’s involvement in this and other activities, contact the
NORA coordinator at noracoordinator@cdc.gov (mailto:noracoordinator@cdc.gov).
Safe Patient Handling Program Implementation: Free Tools and Resources from The
Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The VHA provides toolkits that contain comprehensive information related to developing and maintaining safe
patient handling programs. These toolkits (http://www.tampavaref.org/safe-patient-handling.htm) include
guidance and templates that are being used in VHA hospitals for patient assessment, equipment selection, policy
development, program coordination and management, training, and program assessment. They also include
algorithms that can be used to maximize safety while handling and mobilizing all patients, with extra guidance
specific to “patients of size,” i.e., “bariatric” patients. Easy access to the algorithms and other tools is now available
on a free mobile app (https://mobile.va.gov/app/safe-patient-handling) .
Safe Patient Handling Legislation in the USA
Safe patient handling legislation has been introduced in numerous states and at the federal level.
At the state level, the following safe patient handling laws have been enacted:
California Labor Code Section 6403.5 signed into law On October 7, 2011
Illinois Public Act 97-0122 signed into law on July 30, 2011
New Jersey S-1758/A-3028 signed into law January 2008
Minnesota HB 712.2 signed into law May 2007
Maryland SB 879 signed into law April 2007
Rhode Island House 7386 and Senate 2760, passed on July 7, 2006
Hawaii House Concurrent Resolution No. 16 passed on April 24, 2006
st
7. Washington House Bill 1672 signed into law on March 22, 2006
Ohio House Bill 67, Section 4121.48 signed into law on March 21, 2006
New York companion bills A11484, A07836, S05116, and S08358 signed into law on October 18, 2005
Texas Senate Bill 1525 signed into law on June 17, 2005
To date, no federal safe patient handling law has yet been enacted. The most recently introduced federal bill is the
Nurse and Health Care Worker Protection Act of 2015 (H.R.4266 (https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-
congress/house-bill/4266/text?
q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22%5C%22hr4266%5C%22%22%5D%7D&resultIndex=1) and S.2408
(https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/2408/text?
q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22%5C%22s2408%5C%22%22%5D%7D&resultIndex=1) ).
Read “Preventing Back Injuries in Health Care Settings (http://blogs.cdc.gov/niosh-science-
blog/2008/09/22/lifting/)” on the NIOSH Science Blog and share your comments.
Related Topics
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Health Care Workers
Follow NIOSH
Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/NIOSH)
Flickr (http://www.flickr.com/photos/NIOSH)
Pinterest (http://www.pinterest.com/cdcgov/workplace-safety-and-health/)
Twitter (http://twitter.com/NIOSH)
YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/user/NIOSHSafetyVideos)
NIOSH Homepage
NIOSH A-Z
Workplace Safety & Health Topics
Publications and Products
Programs
Contact NIOSH
8. (https://www.cdc.gov/Other/plugins/#pdf)
File Formats Help:
How do I view different file formats (PDF, DOC, PPT, MPEG) on this site?
(https://www.cdc.gov/Other/plugins/)
Page last reviewed: August 2, 2013
Page last updated: December 4, 2017
Content source: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (http://www.cdc.gov/niosh) Division of Applied Research
and Technology