SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 3
Download to read offline
Feeling the Pressure on Drilling and Completions? :
Well Structure Compliance with Texas Railroad Commission’s Statewide Rule 13
By Logan Lewis, TAEP Government Relations Intern
Drilling a well in the state of Texas. Yup, you all know what I’m talking about, and you are no
doubt familiar with Statewide Rule 13. The Texas Railroad Commission (RRC) recently updated the rule
for the first time in nearly thirty years. The Commission adapted the rule in an effort to tailor the
legislation to account for new technological advances in the industry, but it still adheres to the same
vision as when it was first drafted: ensuring that casing effectively controls the well, isolating all useable
quality water and sealing off all “trouble” zones to ensure no fluid can vertically migrate behind the
casing.
Statewide Rule 13 now details the requirements on everything from drilling fluid regimes and
well control to casing testing and hydraulic fracturing. Not only is it expansive; it is also notoriously
difficult to follow. A few of the most commonly applied topics in Statewide Rule 13 pertain to the
regulations surrounding the pressure testing of casing and the placement of cement. With any luck, this
article will clear up some common misconceptions on these topics and to plainly outline the
requirements presented in the rule.
Rule 13 places immense value on protecting the useable quality ground water located near the
surface (Don’t we all?). This is accomplished by implementing rigorous quality control around setting
and testing the surface casing string. Before operators can even begin to set the casing string, two key
documents are needed: a letter obtained from the Groundwater Advisory Unit of the Oil and Gas
Division and the pipe test documentation. The letter from the Groundwater Advisory Unit specifies the
protection depth that the surface casing must meet to conserve the fresh water strata. The pipe test
documentation consists of either a mill test report for new pipe, or a refurbished pipe report for used
pipe. These reports state that the casing has either been hydrostatically pressure tested or gauged with
a casing evaluation tool and can withstand the maximum downhole pressure. Together, these
documents are meant to prove that the well structure is capable of effectively sealing the protection
zone and should be kept on hand throughout the operation.
Once the operator sets the casing and pumps adequate cement to fill the annular space from
the shoe to the surface, and before drilling the plug out, they assess the casing using a mechanical
integrity test. The operator must test the casing at a pump pressure of 0.5 psi × total vertical depth for
30 minutes. This pressure does not need to exceed 1500 psi. If the pressure drops more than 10% in this
time period, the test is failed, and all operations are suspended until the RRC district director approves a
remediation plan.
After drilling commences through the plug and to the depth of the next casing string, there is a
possibility that the surface casing string may need to be tested once more (obviously, we like to protect
our fresh water). Rule 13 states that if the surface casing is exposed to more than 360 rotating hours,
the string’s integrity must be proven by another hydrostatic pressure test, use of a casing evaluation
tool, or another RRC approved method. The key phrase to notice in this clause is “rotating hours,”
meaning that the time spent tripping in and out of the well is excluded from the net rotating time. In the
event that operators do exceed 360 rotating hours, the testing proceeds in the same manner as the
original test – however, the RRC requests an eight-hour notice to give the district office an opportunity
to witness the test and the outcome.
The intermediate and production casing strings follow identical testing procedures to those of
the surface casing. The same cannot be said for the regulations pertaining to the cement height
requirements. Hoping to detail a wide range of acceptable practices, the legislature devotes an
extensive list of guidelines on determining the top of cement. While this doesn’t make Statewide Rule
13 a lighter read, it does give the operator a bit of autonomy in regards to economics, while still
complying with RRC regulations.
As a standard, each string of casing must be cemented from the shoe to a point 600 feet above
the shoe. That’s the easy part. If and when an operator encounters a “trouble zone” (a productive zone,
potential flow zone, or a zone with corrosive fluid), the rule opens up a margin for operator
interpretation. If the operator plans on sealing off the trouble zone by determining the top of cement by
calculation, the casing must be cemented from the shoe to at least 600 feet above the top of the
shallowest trouble zone. If the operator uses a temperature survey, the cement must rise to 250 feet
above the trouble zone; a cement evaluation log warrants 100-foot rise above the zone and if all else
fails, the cement must rise to at least 200 feet above the shoe of the next casing string. If these
requirements prove impossible or ineffective, the RRC district director can approve alternate cementing
plans and certain multi-stage processes.
Another recent addition to the rule involves injection and disposal zones. In order to
compensate for possible increases of formation pressure and to prevent unwanted fluid from entering
the annulus, casing must be cemented across and above all formations permitted for injections wells
operating within a ¼ mile radius. In the event of an EOR project, the operator must cement the casing
above all formations permitted for injection into productive reservoirs. In both cases, the cement height
is determined using the guidelines for the trouble zones mentioned above.
Finally, the RRC made a significant amendment to Rule 13 concerning hydraulic fracturing
treatments. A minimum internal yield pressure of at least 1.10 times the maximum pressure of the
completion method is Rule 13-standard for any casing string or tubing installed in a well subjected to a
hydraulic fracturing treatment. If the operator included a pressure actuated valve or sleeve in their well
design, the device only needs to be tested at 80% of the actuation pressure for 5 minutes. The total test
of the casing from the wellhead to the top of cement behind the casing concerned is considered a failure
if the original pressure drops by more than 10%. If the test is deemed a failure, the operator must obtain
an RRC-approved remediation plan before the treatment can proceed. This is also relevant if any
abnormal pressure increases are observed in the annulus. As a result, it is exceedingly important that
operators monitor all annuli throughout the treatment operation.
The Texas Railroad Commission spared no attention to detail when outlining well structure in
Statewide Rule 13. They hit every topic from drilling fluid regimes and well control to casing testing and
hydraulic fracturing, all the while reflecting back on the purpose of the rule. By following the regulations
laid out Rule 13 and explained in this article, operators should have little trouble in ensuring that casing
effectively controls the well, seals off all trouble zones, and ultimately isolates and protects all useable
quality water. Hopefully the requirements outlined in the Texas Railroad Commission’s Statewide Rule
13 are now a bit clearer than your average drilling fluid, and we can all get back to drilling for oil!
Casing String Pressure Testing Requirements Cement Height Requirements
Surface Before setting casing: Mill test/
refurbished pipe test documentation
Before drill-out: Tested under
pressure of 0.5 psi × TVD for 30
minutes
After drill-out: If set casing is
subjected to more than 360 rotating
hours integrity must be tested again
in similar manner
Sufficient cement is required to fill the annular
space between the shoe and surface
Casing must stand under pressure until
compressive strength of 500 psi w/ 72 hour
strength of 1200 psi at zone of critical cement:
 Extends from the base of the surface
casing to cover the lower 20% of the
string (minimum of 300’)
 Covers the bottom 20% of the
intermediate/ production string
(minimum of 300’) or to the top of the
highest productive zone
Intermediate/
Production
Before setting casing: Mill test/
refurbished pipe test documentation
Before drill-out: Tested under
pressure of 0.5 psi × TVD for 30
minutes
Unlikely to be subjected to 360
rotating hours
Cemented from shoe to point at least 600’ above
shoe in both cases
If any productive, potential flow or corrosive
zone: the cementing job is determined by:
 Calculation?  600’+ above zones of
interest
 Temperature survey?  250’+ above
zones of interest
 Cement evaluation log?  100’+ above
zones of interest
 At least 200’ above previous casing shoe
Injection
Wells/
Disposal Zones
Casing must be cemented across and above all
formations permitted for injection by wells
within a ¼ mile radius
Casing must be cemented above all formations
permitted for injection into productive reservoirs
(i.e. EOR projects)
In all cases, cement height is determined by:
 Calculation?  600’+ above zones of
interest
 Temperature survey?  250’+ above
zones of interest
 Cement evaluation log?  100’+ above
zones of interest
Hydraulic
Fracturing
All casing strings/tubing must have a
minimum internal yield pressure
rating of at least 1.10 times the
maximum pressure to which they
may be subjected
Pressure actuated valve/sleeves are
tested to 80% of the actuation
pressure for a minimum of 5 minutes
Minimum separation wells:
 Cement with pump and plug method to
a point at least 200’ above the shoe of
the next shallower casing string
 Cement evaluation is subject to
exemptions based on previous field
development

More Related Content

What's hot

Dst (Drill Stem Test)
Dst (Drill Stem Test)Dst (Drill Stem Test)
Dst (Drill Stem Test)Mubarik Rao
 
Aw 101 occupational safety and health 2
Aw 101 occupational safety and health 2Aw 101 occupational safety and health 2
Aw 101 occupational safety and health 2Mohamad_Nizam_Zafael
 
The humble check_valve
The humble check_valveThe humble check_valve
The humble check_valveUsama Khan
 
Gas Lift Optimization and Troubleshooting
Gas Lift Optimization and Troubleshooting Gas Lift Optimization and Troubleshooting
Gas Lift Optimization and Troubleshooting Bailey LeRoux
 
Managing Downhole Failures in a Rod Pumped Well
Managing Downhole Failures in a Rod Pumped Well Managing Downhole Failures in a Rod Pumped Well
Managing Downhole Failures in a Rod Pumped Well Ramez Abdalla, M.Sc
 
Service Operator Surface Well Testing
Service Operator Surface Well TestingService Operator Surface Well Testing
Service Operator Surface Well TestingJason Situmorang
 
Work carried out on 21G20 in March 2013 - Copy
Work carried out on 21G20 in March 2013 - CopyWork carried out on 21G20 in March 2013 - Copy
Work carried out on 21G20 in March 2013 - CopyJoe Edwards
 
Cavitation Reduction in Industrial Process Control Valves
Cavitation Reduction in Industrial Process Control ValvesCavitation Reduction in Industrial Process Control Valves
Cavitation Reduction in Industrial Process Control ValvesCTi Controltech
 
HYDROSTATIC TESTING
HYDROSTATIC TESTINGHYDROSTATIC TESTING
HYDROSTATIC TESTINGPaul Sumal
 
Sop for air compressors
Sop for air compressorsSop for air compressors
Sop for air compressorschaosbrigade
 
Design and analysis of control valve with a multi stage anti cavitation trim
Design and analysis of control valve with a multi stage anti cavitation trimDesign and analysis of control valve with a multi stage anti cavitation trim
Design and analysis of control valve with a multi stage anti cavitation trimnaz4u
 
Centrifugal Pump Testing Standards - Presentation by ITT
Centrifugal Pump Testing Standards - Presentation by ITTCentrifugal Pump Testing Standards - Presentation by ITT
Centrifugal Pump Testing Standards - Presentation by ITTSahyog Shishodia
 
Basic Operation and Function of Control Valves
Basic Operation and Function of Control ValvesBasic Operation and Function of Control Valves
Basic Operation and Function of Control ValvesBelilove Company-Engineers
 

What's hot (18)

Dst (Drill Stem Test)
Dst (Drill Stem Test)Dst (Drill Stem Test)
Dst (Drill Stem Test)
 
Well test procedures manual
Well test procedures manualWell test procedures manual
Well test procedures manual
 
Aw 101 occupational safety and health 2
Aw 101 occupational safety and health 2Aw 101 occupational safety and health 2
Aw 101 occupational safety and health 2
 
ZELS1206B Portable Water Velocity Meter Data
ZELS1206B Portable Water Velocity Meter DataZELS1206B Portable Water Velocity Meter Data
ZELS1206B Portable Water Velocity Meter Data
 
The humble check_valve
The humble check_valveThe humble check_valve
The humble check_valve
 
Gas Lift Optimization and Troubleshooting
Gas Lift Optimization and Troubleshooting Gas Lift Optimization and Troubleshooting
Gas Lift Optimization and Troubleshooting
 
Hydrotest
HydrotestHydrotest
Hydrotest
 
Managing Downhole Failures in a Rod Pumped Well
Managing Downhole Failures in a Rod Pumped Well Managing Downhole Failures in a Rod Pumped Well
Managing Downhole Failures in a Rod Pumped Well
 
Service Operator Surface Well Testing
Service Operator Surface Well TestingService Operator Surface Well Testing
Service Operator Surface Well Testing
 
Work carried out on 21G20 in March 2013 - Copy
Work carried out on 21G20 in March 2013 - CopyWork carried out on 21G20 in March 2013 - Copy
Work carried out on 21G20 in March 2013 - Copy
 
Cavitation Reduction in Industrial Process Control Valves
Cavitation Reduction in Industrial Process Control ValvesCavitation Reduction in Industrial Process Control Valves
Cavitation Reduction in Industrial Process Control Valves
 
2 delugevalve a
2 delugevalve a2 delugevalve a
2 delugevalve a
 
HYDROSTATIC TESTING
HYDROSTATIC TESTINGHYDROSTATIC TESTING
HYDROSTATIC TESTING
 
Sop for air compressors
Sop for air compressorsSop for air compressors
Sop for air compressors
 
04 gas lift_equipment
04 gas lift_equipment04 gas lift_equipment
04 gas lift_equipment
 
Design and analysis of control valve with a multi stage anti cavitation trim
Design and analysis of control valve with a multi stage anti cavitation trimDesign and analysis of control valve with a multi stage anti cavitation trim
Design and analysis of control valve with a multi stage anti cavitation trim
 
Centrifugal Pump Testing Standards - Presentation by ITT
Centrifugal Pump Testing Standards - Presentation by ITTCentrifugal Pump Testing Standards - Presentation by ITT
Centrifugal Pump Testing Standards - Presentation by ITT
 
Basic Operation and Function of Control Valves
Basic Operation and Function of Control ValvesBasic Operation and Function of Control Valves
Basic Operation and Function of Control Valves
 

Viewers also liked

Building a Better Future for Future Generations
Building a Better Future for Future GenerationsBuilding a Better Future for Future Generations
Building a Better Future for Future GenerationsEncore.org
 
Persuasive essay 1000
Persuasive essay 1000Persuasive essay 1000
Persuasive essay 1000EssayAcademy
 
Making The Most Of Your Fears
Making The Most Of Your Fears Making The Most Of Your Fears
Making The Most Of Your Fears Ben Seymour
 
Prueba alimentacion saludable
Prueba alimentacion saludablePrueba alimentacion saludable
Prueba alimentacion saludablekarencatalan777
 
L'entreprise, le travail et la religion - étude 2016
L'entreprise, le travail et la religion - étude 2016L'entreprise, le travail et la religion - étude 2016
L'entreprise, le travail et la religion - étude 2016Groupe Randstad France
 
Bloque comparacion matematica_comparaciomn_iv_visita
Bloque comparacion matematica_comparaciomn_iv_visitaBloque comparacion matematica_comparaciomn_iv_visita
Bloque comparacion matematica_comparaciomn_iv_visitaFroy Castro Ventura
 
Disaster management-ppt
Disaster management-pptDisaster management-ppt
Disaster management-pptVinod Kumari
 
Natural disasters' Impacts & Prevention
Natural disasters' Impacts & PreventionNatural disasters' Impacts & Prevention
Natural disasters' Impacts & PreventionKatie Chan
 
Disaster Management
Disaster ManagementDisaster Management
Disaster ManagementNc Das
 
Natural disaster powerpoint
Natural disaster powerpointNatural disaster powerpoint
Natural disaster powerpointNbort
 
Hidden in Plain Sight: How Intergenerational Relationships Can Transform Our ...
Hidden in Plain Sight: How Intergenerational Relationships Can Transform Our ...Hidden in Plain Sight: How Intergenerational Relationships Can Transform Our ...
Hidden in Plain Sight: How Intergenerational Relationships Can Transform Our ...Encore.org
 
Disaster management ppt
Disaster management pptDisaster management ppt
Disaster management pptAniket Pingale
 

Viewers also liked (14)

Building a Better Future for Future Generations
Building a Better Future for Future GenerationsBuilding a Better Future for Future Generations
Building a Better Future for Future Generations
 
Persuasive essay 1000
Persuasive essay 1000Persuasive essay 1000
Persuasive essay 1000
 
Making The Most Of Your Fears
Making The Most Of Your Fears Making The Most Of Your Fears
Making The Most Of Your Fears
 
Prueba alimentacion saludable
Prueba alimentacion saludablePrueba alimentacion saludable
Prueba alimentacion saludable
 
L'entreprise, le travail et la religion - étude 2016
L'entreprise, le travail et la religion - étude 2016L'entreprise, le travail et la religion - étude 2016
L'entreprise, le travail et la religion - étude 2016
 
Bloque comparacion matematica_comparaciomn_iv_visita
Bloque comparacion matematica_comparaciomn_iv_visitaBloque comparacion matematica_comparaciomn_iv_visita
Bloque comparacion matematica_comparaciomn_iv_visita
 
Disaster management-ppt
Disaster management-pptDisaster management-ppt
Disaster management-ppt
 
Natural disasters' Impacts & Prevention
Natural disasters' Impacts & PreventionNatural disasters' Impacts & Prevention
Natural disasters' Impacts & Prevention
 
Disaster Management
Disaster ManagementDisaster Management
Disaster Management
 
Disaster management
Disaster managementDisaster management
Disaster management
 
Natural disaster powerpoint
Natural disaster powerpointNatural disaster powerpoint
Natural disaster powerpoint
 
Disaster ppt
Disaster pptDisaster ppt
Disaster ppt
 
Hidden in Plain Sight: How Intergenerational Relationships Can Transform Our ...
Hidden in Plain Sight: How Intergenerational Relationships Can Transform Our ...Hidden in Plain Sight: How Intergenerational Relationships Can Transform Our ...
Hidden in Plain Sight: How Intergenerational Relationships Can Transform Our ...
 
Disaster management ppt
Disaster management pptDisaster management ppt
Disaster management ppt
 

Similar to Feeling the Pressure on Drilling and Completion1

Well abandonment process procedures
Well abandonment process proceduresWell abandonment process procedures
Well abandonment process proceduresDrilling Manual
 
Getting in the Zone, Oilfield Technology, December 2018
Getting in the Zone, Oilfield Technology, December 2018Getting in the Zone, Oilfield Technology, December 2018
Getting in the Zone, Oilfield Technology, December 2018tmtallant
 
Key Process Considerations for Pipeline Design Basis
Key Process Considerations for Pipeline Design BasisKey Process Considerations for Pipeline Design Basis
Key Process Considerations for Pipeline Design BasisVijay Sarathy
 
Hydrostatic pressure testing of PE pipelines (handbook) as per EN805
Hydrostatic pressure testing of PE pipelines (handbook) as per EN805Hydrostatic pressure testing of PE pipelines (handbook) as per EN805
Hydrostatic pressure testing of PE pipelines (handbook) as per EN805Vladimir Popovic
 
A practical guide_to_rotary_valves
A practical guide_to_rotary_valvesA practical guide_to_rotary_valves
A practical guide_to_rotary_valvesCarlos Diaz Gomez
 
253651195 astm-c939
253651195 astm-c939253651195 astm-c939
253651195 astm-c939Socolap Pham
 
Semester Assignment Drilling, Reservoir & Well Engineering Study
Semester Assignment Drilling, Reservoir & Well Engineering StudySemester Assignment Drilling, Reservoir & Well Engineering Study
Semester Assignment Drilling, Reservoir & Well Engineering StudyNikolaos Felessakis
 
CNG Technical & Hydrogen Blending in Natural Gas pipeline.pptx
CNG Technical & Hydrogen Blending in Natural Gas pipeline.pptxCNG Technical & Hydrogen Blending in Natural Gas pipeline.pptx
CNG Technical & Hydrogen Blending in Natural Gas pipeline.pptxRishabh Sirvaiya
 
F500 series floco positive displacement meters
F500 series floco positive displacement metersF500 series floco positive displacement meters
F500 series floco positive displacement metersWilly Orosco Mariscal
 
Natural Gas Storage Sample Memo
Natural Gas Storage Sample MemoNatural Gas Storage Sample Memo
Natural Gas Storage Sample MemoChad Colton
 
State Differences Summaries and Checklists for Onshore and Offshore Upstream ...
State Differences Summaries and Checklists for Onshore and Offshore Upstream ...State Differences Summaries and Checklists for Onshore and Offshore Upstream ...
State Differences Summaries and Checklists for Onshore and Offshore Upstream ...Specialty Technical Publishers
 
production casing design considerations
production casing design considerationsproduction casing design considerations
production casing design considerationskillergog
 
Oil and Gas Undergrond Storage Keystone Project.
Oil and Gas Undergrond Storage Keystone Project.Oil and Gas Undergrond Storage Keystone Project.
Oil and Gas Undergrond Storage Keystone Project.Jeffrey Pickett
 
0b5342337b224348ab5435dd7bf76f14
0b5342337b224348ab5435dd7bf76f140b5342337b224348ab5435dd7bf76f14
0b5342337b224348ab5435dd7bf76f14Obionochie Patrick
 
Center for Sustainable Shale Development Comparison to State/Federal Regulations
Center for Sustainable Shale Development Comparison to State/Federal RegulationsCenter for Sustainable Shale Development Comparison to State/Federal Regulations
Center for Sustainable Shale Development Comparison to State/Federal RegulationsMarcellus Drilling News
 

Similar to Feeling the Pressure on Drilling and Completion1 (20)

Well abandonment process procedures
Well abandonment process proceduresWell abandonment process procedures
Well abandonment process procedures
 
Getting in the Zone, Oilfield Technology, December 2018
Getting in the Zone, Oilfield Technology, December 2018Getting in the Zone, Oilfield Technology, December 2018
Getting in the Zone, Oilfield Technology, December 2018
 
Hydraulic catalogue
Hydraulic catalogueHydraulic catalogue
Hydraulic catalogue
 
Key Process Considerations for Pipeline Design Basis
Key Process Considerations for Pipeline Design BasisKey Process Considerations for Pipeline Design Basis
Key Process Considerations for Pipeline Design Basis
 
Hydrostatic pressure testing of PE pipelines (handbook) as per EN805
Hydrostatic pressure testing of PE pipelines (handbook) as per EN805Hydrostatic pressure testing of PE pipelines (handbook) as per EN805
Hydrostatic pressure testing of PE pipelines (handbook) as per EN805
 
A practical guide_to_rotary_valves
A practical guide_to_rotary_valvesA practical guide_to_rotary_valves
A practical guide_to_rotary_valves
 
253651195 astm-c939
253651195 astm-c939253651195 astm-c939
253651195 astm-c939
 
Silo safety
Silo safety Silo safety
Silo safety
 
Semester Assignment Drilling, Reservoir & Well Engineering Study
Semester Assignment Drilling, Reservoir & Well Engineering StudySemester Assignment Drilling, Reservoir & Well Engineering Study
Semester Assignment Drilling, Reservoir & Well Engineering Study
 
CNG Technical & Hydrogen Blending in Natural Gas pipeline.pptx
CNG Technical & Hydrogen Blending in Natural Gas pipeline.pptxCNG Technical & Hydrogen Blending in Natural Gas pipeline.pptx
CNG Technical & Hydrogen Blending in Natural Gas pipeline.pptx
 
Subgrade
SubgradeSubgrade
Subgrade
 
343312365 mt-ppt
343312365 mt-ppt343312365 mt-ppt
343312365 mt-ppt
 
Drilling Mannual
Drilling MannualDrilling Mannual
Drilling Mannual
 
F500 series floco positive displacement meters
F500 series floco positive displacement metersF500 series floco positive displacement meters
F500 series floco positive displacement meters
 
Natural Gas Storage Sample Memo
Natural Gas Storage Sample MemoNatural Gas Storage Sample Memo
Natural Gas Storage Sample Memo
 
State Differences Summaries and Checklists for Onshore and Offshore Upstream ...
State Differences Summaries and Checklists for Onshore and Offshore Upstream ...State Differences Summaries and Checklists for Onshore and Offshore Upstream ...
State Differences Summaries and Checklists for Onshore and Offshore Upstream ...
 
production casing design considerations
production casing design considerationsproduction casing design considerations
production casing design considerations
 
Oil and Gas Undergrond Storage Keystone Project.
Oil and Gas Undergrond Storage Keystone Project.Oil and Gas Undergrond Storage Keystone Project.
Oil and Gas Undergrond Storage Keystone Project.
 
0b5342337b224348ab5435dd7bf76f14
0b5342337b224348ab5435dd7bf76f140b5342337b224348ab5435dd7bf76f14
0b5342337b224348ab5435dd7bf76f14
 
Center for Sustainable Shale Development Comparison to State/Federal Regulations
Center for Sustainable Shale Development Comparison to State/Federal RegulationsCenter for Sustainable Shale Development Comparison to State/Federal Regulations
Center for Sustainable Shale Development Comparison to State/Federal Regulations
 

Feeling the Pressure on Drilling and Completion1

  • 1. Feeling the Pressure on Drilling and Completions? : Well Structure Compliance with Texas Railroad Commission’s Statewide Rule 13 By Logan Lewis, TAEP Government Relations Intern Drilling a well in the state of Texas. Yup, you all know what I’m talking about, and you are no doubt familiar with Statewide Rule 13. The Texas Railroad Commission (RRC) recently updated the rule for the first time in nearly thirty years. The Commission adapted the rule in an effort to tailor the legislation to account for new technological advances in the industry, but it still adheres to the same vision as when it was first drafted: ensuring that casing effectively controls the well, isolating all useable quality water and sealing off all “trouble” zones to ensure no fluid can vertically migrate behind the casing. Statewide Rule 13 now details the requirements on everything from drilling fluid regimes and well control to casing testing and hydraulic fracturing. Not only is it expansive; it is also notoriously difficult to follow. A few of the most commonly applied topics in Statewide Rule 13 pertain to the regulations surrounding the pressure testing of casing and the placement of cement. With any luck, this article will clear up some common misconceptions on these topics and to plainly outline the requirements presented in the rule. Rule 13 places immense value on protecting the useable quality ground water located near the surface (Don’t we all?). This is accomplished by implementing rigorous quality control around setting and testing the surface casing string. Before operators can even begin to set the casing string, two key documents are needed: a letter obtained from the Groundwater Advisory Unit of the Oil and Gas Division and the pipe test documentation. The letter from the Groundwater Advisory Unit specifies the protection depth that the surface casing must meet to conserve the fresh water strata. The pipe test documentation consists of either a mill test report for new pipe, or a refurbished pipe report for used pipe. These reports state that the casing has either been hydrostatically pressure tested or gauged with a casing evaluation tool and can withstand the maximum downhole pressure. Together, these documents are meant to prove that the well structure is capable of effectively sealing the protection zone and should be kept on hand throughout the operation. Once the operator sets the casing and pumps adequate cement to fill the annular space from the shoe to the surface, and before drilling the plug out, they assess the casing using a mechanical integrity test. The operator must test the casing at a pump pressure of 0.5 psi × total vertical depth for 30 minutes. This pressure does not need to exceed 1500 psi. If the pressure drops more than 10% in this time period, the test is failed, and all operations are suspended until the RRC district director approves a remediation plan. After drilling commences through the plug and to the depth of the next casing string, there is a possibility that the surface casing string may need to be tested once more (obviously, we like to protect our fresh water). Rule 13 states that if the surface casing is exposed to more than 360 rotating hours, the string’s integrity must be proven by another hydrostatic pressure test, use of a casing evaluation tool, or another RRC approved method. The key phrase to notice in this clause is “rotating hours,” meaning that the time spent tripping in and out of the well is excluded from the net rotating time. In the event that operators do exceed 360 rotating hours, the testing proceeds in the same manner as the original test – however, the RRC requests an eight-hour notice to give the district office an opportunity to witness the test and the outcome.
  • 2. The intermediate and production casing strings follow identical testing procedures to those of the surface casing. The same cannot be said for the regulations pertaining to the cement height requirements. Hoping to detail a wide range of acceptable practices, the legislature devotes an extensive list of guidelines on determining the top of cement. While this doesn’t make Statewide Rule 13 a lighter read, it does give the operator a bit of autonomy in regards to economics, while still complying with RRC regulations. As a standard, each string of casing must be cemented from the shoe to a point 600 feet above the shoe. That’s the easy part. If and when an operator encounters a “trouble zone” (a productive zone, potential flow zone, or a zone with corrosive fluid), the rule opens up a margin for operator interpretation. If the operator plans on sealing off the trouble zone by determining the top of cement by calculation, the casing must be cemented from the shoe to at least 600 feet above the top of the shallowest trouble zone. If the operator uses a temperature survey, the cement must rise to 250 feet above the trouble zone; a cement evaluation log warrants 100-foot rise above the zone and if all else fails, the cement must rise to at least 200 feet above the shoe of the next casing string. If these requirements prove impossible or ineffective, the RRC district director can approve alternate cementing plans and certain multi-stage processes. Another recent addition to the rule involves injection and disposal zones. In order to compensate for possible increases of formation pressure and to prevent unwanted fluid from entering the annulus, casing must be cemented across and above all formations permitted for injections wells operating within a ¼ mile radius. In the event of an EOR project, the operator must cement the casing above all formations permitted for injection into productive reservoirs. In both cases, the cement height is determined using the guidelines for the trouble zones mentioned above. Finally, the RRC made a significant amendment to Rule 13 concerning hydraulic fracturing treatments. A minimum internal yield pressure of at least 1.10 times the maximum pressure of the completion method is Rule 13-standard for any casing string or tubing installed in a well subjected to a hydraulic fracturing treatment. If the operator included a pressure actuated valve or sleeve in their well design, the device only needs to be tested at 80% of the actuation pressure for 5 minutes. The total test of the casing from the wellhead to the top of cement behind the casing concerned is considered a failure if the original pressure drops by more than 10%. If the test is deemed a failure, the operator must obtain an RRC-approved remediation plan before the treatment can proceed. This is also relevant if any abnormal pressure increases are observed in the annulus. As a result, it is exceedingly important that operators monitor all annuli throughout the treatment operation. The Texas Railroad Commission spared no attention to detail when outlining well structure in Statewide Rule 13. They hit every topic from drilling fluid regimes and well control to casing testing and hydraulic fracturing, all the while reflecting back on the purpose of the rule. By following the regulations laid out Rule 13 and explained in this article, operators should have little trouble in ensuring that casing effectively controls the well, seals off all trouble zones, and ultimately isolates and protects all useable quality water. Hopefully the requirements outlined in the Texas Railroad Commission’s Statewide Rule 13 are now a bit clearer than your average drilling fluid, and we can all get back to drilling for oil!
  • 3. Casing String Pressure Testing Requirements Cement Height Requirements Surface Before setting casing: Mill test/ refurbished pipe test documentation Before drill-out: Tested under pressure of 0.5 psi × TVD for 30 minutes After drill-out: If set casing is subjected to more than 360 rotating hours integrity must be tested again in similar manner Sufficient cement is required to fill the annular space between the shoe and surface Casing must stand under pressure until compressive strength of 500 psi w/ 72 hour strength of 1200 psi at zone of critical cement:  Extends from the base of the surface casing to cover the lower 20% of the string (minimum of 300’)  Covers the bottom 20% of the intermediate/ production string (minimum of 300’) or to the top of the highest productive zone Intermediate/ Production Before setting casing: Mill test/ refurbished pipe test documentation Before drill-out: Tested under pressure of 0.5 psi × TVD for 30 minutes Unlikely to be subjected to 360 rotating hours Cemented from shoe to point at least 600’ above shoe in both cases If any productive, potential flow or corrosive zone: the cementing job is determined by:  Calculation?  600’+ above zones of interest  Temperature survey?  250’+ above zones of interest  Cement evaluation log?  100’+ above zones of interest  At least 200’ above previous casing shoe Injection Wells/ Disposal Zones Casing must be cemented across and above all formations permitted for injection by wells within a ¼ mile radius Casing must be cemented above all formations permitted for injection into productive reservoirs (i.e. EOR projects) In all cases, cement height is determined by:  Calculation?  600’+ above zones of interest  Temperature survey?  250’+ above zones of interest  Cement evaluation log?  100’+ above zones of interest Hydraulic Fracturing All casing strings/tubing must have a minimum internal yield pressure rating of at least 1.10 times the maximum pressure to which they may be subjected Pressure actuated valve/sleeves are tested to 80% of the actuation pressure for a minimum of 5 minutes Minimum separation wells:  Cement with pump and plug method to a point at least 200’ above the shoe of the next shallower casing string  Cement evaluation is subject to exemptions based on previous field development