1. DNA Clues to Human Origins Indicate Brutal Genetic Culling
Updated with the latest findings as of January 2017, and a tribute to origins theorist Lloyd Pye
by L. Allen Brantley
“It is Error only, and not Truth, that shrinks from inquiry.” — Thomas Paine
Introduction
The search for definitive answers to human origins is easily the most fascinating challenge in all of
science and perhaps the least settled. New evidence arrives almost daily setting ivory towers a-
quiver and occasionally uprooting theories (and reputations) cultivated for hundreds of years.
The free market of ideas and raw data now arrives at your face in High-Definition 3D Virtual
Reality, ruthlessly assaulting the conventional scientific view of many of these issues and perhaps
even challenging the exalted Scientific Method. You can stroll or fly (via dronecam) through
places like the Pyramids, Yonaguni, the Grand Canyon, Angkor Wat, Machu Picchu, or South L.A.
A chatty, attractive tourguide avatar AI will soon be an option. Be aware, it no doubt works for a
government or media cartel, at the very least recording your preferences and quirks.
Contents
CHAPTER I. The intellectual and technological challenge to mainstream Science 2
CHAPTER II. How DNA truth could change the world 7
CHAPTER III. The Starchild Skull and other evidence 9
CHAPTER IV. Leaving the tunnel 14
CHAPTER V. DNA truth 19
CHAPTER VI. The family bramble bush 23
CHAPTER VII. DNA conundrums 27
CHAPTER VIII. Tracks and film 33
CHAPTER IX. Summary 36

2. CHAPTER I. The intellectual and technological challenge to mainstream Science
Academia is traditionally and understandably slow to rewrite textbooks or overhaul curricula;
nevertheless the time for meaningful change has arrived. For example the entire concept of
“textbook” obviously needs reformulation given the parabolic trajectory of technology and
bandwidth options vs. having to chop down trees, float them down the river, etc.
A prickly tension grows between the brave writers and flamboyant hosts of the History Channel's
Ancient Aliens series and mainstream Science (mScience). But a growing clique of 'maverick'
credentialed scientists and PhD's are beginning to find their way out of the dark shadows and
mental jungle of the ivory towers, leading to some new paradigms.
The journalists, bloggers and amateur experts supporting their ideas vie for clicks on YouTube
with videos presenting evidence and narrative that are indeed out on the edge. If you haven't seen
the Paracas skulls, the Starchild Skull, the stonework at Puma Punku, Bolivia, or the extraordinary
12 thousand-year-old pillars at Gobekli Tepe, Turkey, you are missing the show. Your perspective
is defective.
Just because they poke sleeping dogmas and pry the lids off inconvenient worm cans, it does not
follow that their work should be denigrated with the pejorative “pseudoscience.” Ignored science,
previously misunderstood science, demonstrably blind science or suppressed science is not
pseudoscience. Smugly pretending that important scientific questions are settled and must never
be challenged or debated is far creepier than simple professional vanity or noble efforts to
preserve Sir Francis Bacon's hallowed Method.
"Suspicion must always fall upon those who attempt to silence their opponents."
— Ian Buckley, radical Irish playwright
The New 'Producers'
TV producers on deadlines bypass the snails' pace of hidebound scientific method and certified
paleontology to crisply present directly to the visual cortex of spellbound audiences in glorious
full-color HD, the dramatic, mysterious and unexplained from all over the world. Hard evidence
and traces of possible pre-ice age civilizations, rediscovered or finally recognized for what they are
and what they mean, appear on every continent, and as well, beneath every ocean.
Yes, some are overhyped and have mundane explanations, but hardly all. Take five minutes to
examine the photos of the megaliths at Baalbek, Lebanon. The existence of these great stones, a
few used in the construction of the Baalbek Platform which required transporting from the quarry
and raising 30 to 60 feet, defy explanation by any conventional engineering means. Some still
being excavated are estimated to weigh more than 1500 tons.
Simply, there has never been a crane or even two or three cranes in existence that could lift such a
load, much less move it and place it on top of a wall 30 feet up. There are a few barely plausible
mainstream theories as to how Giza perhaps came to be, but nothing begins to explain the
immovable giant beams and obelisks of Baalbek. Except, you know...
Audiences suddenly can use their own eyes, logic and judgment, deciding for themselves whether
the official mainstream scientific narratives explain all the observed facts. In case no one has

3. mentioned it lately, that is the first test of the validity of any theory.
And of course these writers, producers and bloggers have little to lose and everything to gain in
the way of credentials, probably necessary to the process. However the precise opposite is true for
those whose life's work they are trying to challenge, so no help there.
The TV viewing public is quite intrigued by these new “experts” who insist that certain extremely
strange artifacts and mind-boggling constructions need better explanations than what mScience
and mArchaeology glibly provide. Ancient Aliens, now in its twelfth season and moved from the
History Channel to their H2 channel (after protests by, presumably, religious groups) neverthless
has one of the fastest growing audiences on cable.
However, in contrast to what many creationists would say about alternative theorists, Christians
and creationists have just as much right to make TV shows and point to the same scientific
evidence to bolster their own theories on their own cable and YouTube channels as alternative
media, and they do.
Note that heavy-handed mainstream efforts to censor and messenger-slime those with
constitutional rights to express their opinions and seek clear answers endanger both sides of this
debate. Instead, they want to institutionalize a dogma that has long since had its day, something
along the lines of "nothing to see here, move along." And that would be no fun at all.
"The truth is not for all men, but only those who seek it." — Ayn Rand
Radical Epistemology
Safe to say that no matter how these conflicts resolve, the ol' scientific method is never going to be
quite the same again. Whether science and academia approve and participate or not our methods
of learning, our epistemology, is undergoing dramatic technological transformation.
Even before the symbiosis becomes internal, as with wearable AI's (like "Siri" whispering
seductively in our ears) and soon enough with implants, our language paradigms and worldviews
within have already changed as we learn the new ways of apprehending reality and truth and
expressing these perceptions in language that updates itself daily. Any new slang term or cute
idea becomes a meme and hashtag within minutes.
Learning becomes a dynamic state of mind, even an interactive game rather than drudge work.
Education can be properly understood as a lifelong process as it always should have been, rather
than a discrete goal presumably reached after 4 years of overpriced college.
Out of Control... theirs
These fundamental shifts are predictably misunderstood and misrepresented by the self-appointed
keepers of our culture and would-be über-authoritarian arbiters of thought and expression.
Threatened power structures would “control” the internet and social media and even restrict
research and inquiry, especially that which might overturn orthodox views.
Human curiosity at work is characterized as uncredentialed miscreants living in their parents'
basements watching "Fake News" and attempting to create some of their own for clickbait. And
don't touch those textbooks, we'll tell you if and when any meaningful science is discovered.

4. "...[I]n holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should,
we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy
could itself become the captive of scientific technological elite."
— Dwight D. Eisenhower, 34th President of the US.