SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 13
Running Head:IPLANNINIZERS
IPLANninizers of Kane County
Northern Illinois University
PHHE 469-1
Irene Cruz (Organization Capacity Assessment)
Chanelle Jones (Community Health Plan)
Kevin McKenzie (Accessibility, Availability…)
Omotola Okunuga (Reliability and Validity. . .)
Shqiponja Zeneli (Community Health Needs Assessment)
Organization Capacity Assessment
IPLANNINIZERS 2
“The Illinois Project for Local Assessment of Needs (IPLAN) is a community health
assessment and planning process that is conducted every five years by local health jurisdictions
in Illinois. This is to help county improve their living rates in their area. This help developed
different or more programs for their community to make residents more health. In Kane County,
it is reference as Community Health Improvement Plan (CHIP).
A Community Health Improvement Plan is a long-term, systematic effort to address
health problems in a community based on results from a community health assessment. The plan
recommends priorities for action and is used by health and other governmental, education, and
social service agencies and organizations to implement policies and programs that promote
health.
The Kane County’s community health needs assessment is found within the required
government IPLAN section. Kane County IPLAN, which is known as the CHIP (Community
Health Improvement Plan), obeys to the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH)
requirements. Kane County’s CHIP met this requirement by conducting their assessment every
five years as well as providing their goal for the next five years.
The first thing for a IPLAN, is should be well put together it needs to have some type
format that things are easy to find. Well organized, there should be pages number, subtitles listed
and maybe a table of contents. Also known as capacity which means, the abstract term that
describes a wide range of capabilities, knowledge, and resources that nonprofits need in order to
be effective. According to Grantmakers for Effective Organizations, it is “the rededication to
achieving results.” Organizational capacity is multi-faceted and continually evolving. Six
components of organizational capacity are necessary for high performance: governance and
IPLANNINIZERS 3
leadership; mission, vision, and strategy; program delivery and impact.; strategic relationships;
resource development; and internal operations and management.
In Kane’s CHIP, it is well put together from it’s title page to the reference page. There
content meets all the state requirements that they are required to included. Someone could easy
follow the format of the plan since it has the bold words when it is translation from different
topics. Throughout the plan Timmreck’s “10-step Planning Model” is used in the development
of their future goals. It goes really in depth with multiple sub- categories to express their
thoughts within each group. Also to show how the past goals were meet or still being worked on.
The purpose of the IPLAN is to be unique for its assigned area which Kane county has
meet that goal. It starts with the reference of the documentation which is the CHIP unlike
DeKalb’s which it is still IPLAN. I really like that in Kane’s there is color and many graphs
which makes it more presentable. I would not mind working with Kane County’s since it looks
to be more modernized unlike DeKalb’s which looks like a dull documentation. There is similar
data presented but different ways of approaching it since they are different population.
The community health needs assessment as stated by the CDC “identifies key health
issues and needs through systematic data collection and analysis”. This assessment is known to
determine the strengths and identify the weaknesses of Kane County. The community health
needs assessment primarily serves as a structure to improve health problems within the county.
Kane County states that their goal is to” identify areas where we can have the largest
impact on improving the quality of life for all Kane residents – particularly the most vulnerable
residents of our community – by reducing preventable sickness and death”(CHIP 2011). The
IPLANNINIZERS 4
CHIP also described the process and outcomes of their listed priorities in order to meet the
second mandate of IDPH. They perform this task by using the National Prevention Strategy.
With this strategy Kane County was able to plan and assess their community Themes and
Strengths and Public Health System Priorities.
After reading the Kane County’s needs assessment, I have come to a conclusion that this
assessment links best with Timmrecks’s “10- Step Planning Model”. This needs assessment
relates to the Timmreck’s three core functions, assessment, policy development, and assurance.
In addition, to the three core measures it also correlates with steps two and four from the model.
Step two is known as the Assessment, organization, resources and review of regulations. CHIP
2011 looks into the internal and external assessments by affiliating the local hospital, United
Way and the INC Board. Step four in Timmreck’s Model is the Needs Assessment. In this step
Timmreck focuses on the process of identifying, completing, and evaluating the needs
assessment. Kane County completes this step by holding focus groups and incorporating
Northern Illinois University Public Opinion Laboratory. Once they compiled their needed data,
Kane County evaluated it in order to come up with their major health priorities.
Overall, the Kane County CHIP needs assessment seems to be much more detailed and in
depth, compared to the DeKalb County IPLAN. The Kane County community health needs
assessment has more data within the CHIP than DeKalb County does. The DeKalb County
IPLAN has a simple layout and makes it easy to find each section. They also focused only on
their three priorities whereas; Kane County looked into other factors that affect the county as
well. Some factors that they took into consideration were socioeconomic status, access to
healthcare, as well as their surrounding environments. Being able to incorporate these factors
IPLANNINIZERS 5
into their major health priorities will allow them to develop programs in order to have a healthier
county. I believe that both counties did a nice job laying out their IPLAN’s but it all depends on
who has the supporting data, and Kane County did a much better job providing this information.
This makes the Kane County CHIP more reliable and much more evidence based.
The Kane County Community Health Improvement Plan (CHIP) is set to better Kane
residents and help improve quality of life. The plan can be used by health professionals, the
government, in educational settings, communities, social services, faith- based organizations and
other identifying agencies where resources are used to improve one’s quality of life in Kane
County (CHIP, 2011-2016). The plan includes four priorities and six health threats focusing on
the causes contributing to the health issues people face every day. CHIP is not only focusing on
access to medical care or behaviors but also on social, economic and environments that
contribute to good health. Kane County believe the need to address these issues may result in
“successful” population health. The four priorities are Support Health Behaviors that Promote
Well-Being and Prevent Disease Priority, Increase Access to High Quality, Holistic Preventive
and Treatment Services Across the Health Care System Priority, Support and Create Health
Promoting Neighborhoods, Towns and Cities Priority, and Promote Social, Economic, and
Educational Environments that Optimize Health. The six health threats that go along with this
are obesity, chronic disease, infant mortality, childhood lead poisoning, communicable disease,
and poor social and emotional wellness.
According to Kane County a few of the goals for the first priority Support Health
Behaviors that Promote Well-Being and Prevent Disease Priority, includes the reduction of
tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke which has an effect on chronic
IPLANNINIZERS 6
disease. People that don’t smoke are being exposed to hazardous tobacco smoke and needs to be
protected by policies. Also, by increasing access and consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables
it can help lower obesity rates, especially in low- income areas where fresh fruit and veggies may
not be available. Coordinate the effective communication of tailored, accurate and actionable
health information to Kane County residents across the lifespan, and create environments that
prevent excessive consumption of alcohol. The second priority Increase Access to High Quality,
Holistic Preventive and Treatment Services across the Health Care System, includes increasing
the proportion of residents of all ages that have regular, ongoing sources of medical and dental
care as well as increasing the proportion of residents of all ages who receive appropriate,
evidence- based clinical preventive services. Also, it focuses culturally appropriate outreach and
engagement efforts to eliminate racial disparities in health outcomes, especially in infant
mortality. It enhances systems to support the prevention, early identification and treatment of
communicable diseases in the community. Lastly, it enhances systems to support the prevention,
early identification and evidence-based treatment of mental health conditions. Priority three
Support & Create Health Promoting Neighborhoods, Towns & Cities goals includes Increase the
availability and variety of high quality, safe and affordable housing and compact, mixed use
developments by Instituting “complete streets” types of policies to ensure that roadways are
designed and operated with all users in mind - including bicyclists, public transportation vehicles
and riders, and pedestrians of all ages and abilities. Assure access to safe playgrounds, parks,
trails and open space. Assure access to safe food and clean and safe water and air. The fourth
priority is to Promote Social, Economic and Educational Environments that Optimize Health by
increasing the proportion of children who have high quality early developmental support,
especially in child care and education and by increasing the proportion of Kane County young
IPLANNINIZERS 7
people that complete high school education as well as increasing the job skills and readiness of
Kane County residents that is unemployed (CHIP 2011-2016).
The Kane county Community health improvement plan wants to ensure that the
accessibility, availability, and acceptability of the plan is able to reach each individual of the
county wanting to find any information or data relevant to Kane County.
The overall accessibility of the Kane county IPLAN is easy to find and access all the
health and data you are wishing to find as the County’s IPLAN is found online on the Kane
County health department's website which is www.kanehealth.com. For being an individual with
no knowledge of IPLANs, or minimal health and data knowledge finding the website and the
actual IPLAN was rather difficult as they call it the Community Health Improvement
Plan(CHIP) rather than IPLAN which led to confusion when searching for their IPLAN. Once
we found their IPLAN all the data and information we needed was found on a downloadable pdf
file on their main page. Included on that page was multiple live links with other useful data sets,
executive summaries about other assessments the kane county health department has done
previously, as well as having a website that has all their assessments and data sets together in
what seemed to be a one drive or even something similar to dropbox.
The Availability of the IPLAN is available to any individual with the basic technological
requirements in today’s society. Majority of individuals have smart phones, computers, and the
access to emails through one of the many apps they have on their phone so that makes accessing
the available information provided online from Kane County Health Department in regards to
their IPLAN and other health related issues easy as well. For those who don’t have access to
smartphones or a computer they can still access the information available in the IPLAN by
calling or by even physically stopping in to the Health department to speak to a representative or
even ask to have a physical hard copy of the information you are requesting or the entire IPLAN.
Once you have the IPLAN document the availability to any health issues or data is easily
available and is easy to find as the document is easy to read and follow as well as find any data
or information you are looking for within the document.
IPLANNINIZERS 8
The Kane County IPLAN follows all the required information and regulations from the
Illinois Department of Public Health when completing their community assessments every five
years. This helps make the County’s IPLAN Acceptable for not only the county itself but for the
individuals living there as well. Within the County IPLAN they have included an Executive
summary detailing the document briefly and what all goes into it and what you may find while
reading over the material. The document also has a table of contents with appendix’s listed at the
end with data sets, tables, and graphs charting data and comparing information from previous
years. The items throughout the document are easy to follow and seem to be in logical order and
won’t confuse the reader as they read over the material and analyze the data sets.
When comparing the Kane County IPLAN to the Dekalb County IPLAN I found that
when searching for the IPLAN for either county Dekalb County’s was easier to find as all i had
to do was google search the name or even just access the website dekalbcounty.gov/health/ and
under Administration tab it has its own link to the county’s IPLAN which may be a little more
difficult as I wouldnt think administration would category id class the IPLAN under. The Dekalb
County IPLAN I feel wasn’t as easy to read as the Kane county IPLAN but when it came to
content and the accessibility and availability of the information provided in either document they
are almost on the same level when it comes to quality and ease of access if you were an
individual with minimal to no knowledge about healthcare and IPLANs. One thing about the
Dekalb County IPLAN that is different than Kane County’s IPLAN is that Dekalb County’s
IPLAN has a much larger table of contents and information included into their IPLAN than Kane
County which I feel can either be a good or bad thing when it comes to analyzing data but may
confuse the reader as they might feel overwhelmed by all the data and information included
within the report.
According to AFMC Primer on Population Health, “Reliability refers to dependability or
consistency” while Validity “does the test measure what we are intending to measure?” So
basically, Reliability is based on how consistent and dependable either a plan or an individual
can be. And Validity is how valid a plan or a measurement we intend on measuring are. AFMC
Primer on Population Health also states that, “there is no single approach to measuring validity:
IPLANNINIZERS 9
the approach varies according to the purpose of the measurement and the sources of
measurement error you wish to detect. In medicine, the commonest way to assess validity is to
compare the measurement with a more extensive clinical or pathological examination of the
patient. This is called criterion validation, because it compares the measurement to a full work-
up that is considered a "gold standard" criterion. This is used where the measurement offers a
brief and simple way to assess the patient’s condition, and our question is: How well does this
simple method predict the results of a full and detailed (and also expensive, perhaps invasive)
examination?
On this project, one of the criteria I would be discussing about is Reliability and Validity
of Data Set Information which is already stated above, definitions, and the use of this criteria. In
regards to Kane County IPLAN, on page 12 of Kane County 2012-2016 Community Health
Improvement Plan, it states that they are required to conduct a “community health assessments
every 3-5years”. So basically, there mandated data set to be done every two years.
The data set include to “adopt an implementation strategy”, implement a program to help
promote and protect the health of the public and community by developing the quality of al
health department throughout the United States and national public health departments. So
therefore, the data set does support the goal and objectives stated.
The key objective according to Kane County 2012-2016 Community Health
Improvement IPLAN, “is to integrate for Health Impact Assessment as part of projects, plans,
and policies at the county and municipal level.” And also, the data sets provided is set to be used
every two years but the one used presently is about four years old. Perhaps, this is between four
years season for a reason. Plans and projects for a long term was mapped out to avoid being
IPLANNINIZERS 10
assessed every two years but instead include updates when needed. In DeKalb County’s IPLAN,
they seem to be focusing on the broader view of improving Public Health County wide. DeKalb
purpose of IPLAN states that, “it’s a planning process that is based on the Assessment Protocol
for Excellent in Public Health (APEXPH)” by which they would developing public health
organizations worldwide.
According to the DeKalb County Health Department: Illinois Project for Local
Assessments of Needs (IPLAN), DeKalb County provide the following tasks, “commitment to
improving the health of health county, willingness to maintain a county-wide perspective,
willingness to provide the required time, and ability to represent an important perspective,
organization, or sector of the county” all this are their primary objective to improving Public
Health but specifically “identify and prioritize health problems in accordance with the IPLAN
process, present their perspective in discussions, balancing those views with a county-wide
perspective, and finally participate in the development and recommendation of a health plan for
the county”.
Three reasons why I think DeKalb county’s is better, first, they work towards improving
Public Health worldwide, potential priorities are visible, and lastly, IPLAN is well arranged and
easy to access to grab on the important information’s needed. Easy accessibility, valid, and
reliable to the community to follow along with. This is what I call “transparency” by which the
entire county has an idea what is going on within.
Unfortunately, the data set are set at exactly at the range of four years difference. Their
data is reliable in the sense that it’s very dependable, more resourceful, and fully detailed in their
IPLAN in year 2002. As we know that validity, is questioning if the test measure Access to
IPLANNINIZERS 11
Health Care (Access to specialty care), Maternal and Child Health (Infant mortality), Chronic
Disease (Cardiovascular diseases), Access to Mental Health Services, and Public Health
Maintenance of Effort”, according to Kane County 2006 Community Health Improvement
IPLAN. With statement it clearly states to what measure they are planning to reach and
implement healthy food productions. Not only that but also redevelopment housing authority,
community gardens, sidewalks, and bike lanes.
Lastly, the most important reason why both reliability and validity is important in an
IPLAN is because reliability states the consistency of change and resources that could be
dependable for future reference while validity is knowing what to measure and question if you’re
measuring what is really needed to be measured. Also the concept of transparency helps to keep
whole county as whole in the loop and follow with assessments.
IPLANNINIZERS 12
References
2000 GEN-GEO Conference. (Grantmakers Evaluation Network and Grantmakers for Effective
Organizations, 2000)
AFMC Primer on Population Health: The Association of Facilities of Medicine of Canada
http://phprimer.afmc.ca/Part2MethodsStudyingHealth/Chapter6MethodsMeasuringHealth
/Reliabilityandvalidityofhealthmeasures
Community Health Improvement Plan. (n.d.). Retrieved November 10, 2015, from
http://kanehealth.com/chip.htm
DeKalb County Health Department: Illinois Project for Local Assessments of Needs (IPLAN),
March 26 2013. http://dekalbcounty.org/health/administration/pdf/IPLANassess.pdf
IPLAN. (n.d.). Retrieved November 9, 2015, from http://dekalbcounty.org/health/admin
istration/IPLAN.html
Illinois Project for Local Assessment of Needs (IPLAN). (n.d.). Retrieved November 5, 2015,
from http://app.idph.state.il.us/
Kane County 2012-2016 Community Health Improvement IPLAN.
http://kanehealth.com/PDFs/CHIP/CHIP-short.pdf
Kane County Community Needs Assessment and Community Health Plan, 2006
http://kanehealth.com/PDFs/Planning/IPLAN/The2006IPLAN.pdf
Kane County Population Estimates, Feb. 2007 by IPLAN Databook 2006/Charts
http://kanehealth.com/PDFs/Planning/IPLAN/IPLANDatabook2006.pdf
IPLANNINIZERS 13

More Related Content

What's hot

Health policy brief powerpoint final 2013
Health policy brief powerpoint final  2013Health policy brief powerpoint final  2013
Health policy brief powerpoint final 2013dkenney13
 
Civil Society Engagement Practical Country Platform Solutions to Reach Every ...
Civil Society Engagement Practical Country Platform Solutions to Reach Every ...Civil Society Engagement Practical Country Platform Solutions to Reach Every ...
Civil Society Engagement Practical Country Platform Solutions to Reach Every ...CORE Group
 
Comments on the hhs strategic plan 2010
Comments on the hhs strategic plan 2010Comments on the hhs strategic plan 2010
Comments on the hhs strategic plan 2010The National Council
 
FWB_FinalReport_2006
FWB_FinalReport_2006FWB_FinalReport_2006
FWB_FinalReport_2006Liz Pearson
 
A Framework for Healthcare and Public Health Collaboration: The Population He...
A Framework for Healthcare and Public Health Collaboration: The Population He...A Framework for Healthcare and Public Health Collaboration: The Population He...
A Framework for Healthcare and Public Health Collaboration: The Population He...Practical Playbook
 
Medicaid Waiver: MI Choice Presentation
Medicaid Waiver: MI Choice Presentation Medicaid Waiver: MI Choice Presentation
Medicaid Waiver: MI Choice Presentation Pam Perry
 
Healthy Lives, Healthy People: The Public Health White Paper
Healthy Lives, Healthy People: The Public Health White Paper Healthy Lives, Healthy People: The Public Health White Paper
Healthy Lives, Healthy People: The Public Health White Paper Voluntary Action LeicesterShire
 
PCD_HECEPP_ResultsPaper_2015
PCD_HECEPP_ResultsPaper_2015PCD_HECEPP_ResultsPaper_2015
PCD_HECEPP_ResultsPaper_2015Janet Jeon
 
Moving towards health equity in ky update
Moving towards health equity in ky updateMoving towards health equity in ky update
Moving towards health equity in ky updateVivian Lasley-Bibbs
 
Driving Health Equity into Action: Policy Change and Community Mobilization t...
Driving Health Equity into Action: Policy Change and Community Mobilization t...Driving Health Equity into Action: Policy Change and Community Mobilization t...
Driving Health Equity into Action: Policy Change and Community Mobilization t...Wellesley Institute
 
MPS_civil_society_case_studies
MPS_civil_society_case_studiesMPS_civil_society_case_studies
MPS_civil_society_case_studiesAlia Khan
 
WA DOH State Plan for Healthy Communities Recommended Changes - PowerPoint - ...
WA DOH State Plan for Healthy Communities Recommended Changes - PowerPoint - ...WA DOH State Plan for Healthy Communities Recommended Changes - PowerPoint - ...
WA DOH State Plan for Healthy Communities Recommended Changes - PowerPoint - ...James Harvey, Ed.S., BCPC, AAC
 
A retrospective review of the Honduras AIN-C program guided by a community he...
A retrospective review of the Honduras AIN-C program guided by a community he...A retrospective review of the Honduras AIN-C program guided by a community he...
A retrospective review of the Honduras AIN-C program guided by a community he...HFG Project
 
RuralHealth-NDWhitePaper-AFTER
RuralHealth-NDWhitePaper-AFTERRuralHealth-NDWhitePaper-AFTER
RuralHealth-NDWhitePaper-AFTERTim DeBolt
 
Substance Abuse Kent, Michigan
Substance Abuse Kent, MichiganSubstance Abuse Kent, Michigan
Substance Abuse Kent, Michiganrecoveryrestart2
 
Community Health Worker Models: A Focus on Sustainability MOLLY CHRISTIANSEN
Community Health Worker Models: A Focus on Sustainability MOLLY CHRISTIANSENCommunity Health Worker Models: A Focus on Sustainability MOLLY CHRISTIANSEN
Community Health Worker Models: A Focus on Sustainability MOLLY CHRISTIANSENCORE Group
 
Paving the Way: CLAS & Policy
Paving the Way: CLAS & PolicyPaving the Way: CLAS & Policy
Paving the Way: CLAS & PolicyDarci Graves
 

What's hot (20)

Health policy brief powerpoint final 2013
Health policy brief powerpoint final  2013Health policy brief powerpoint final  2013
Health policy brief powerpoint final 2013
 
Civil Society Engagement Practical Country Platform Solutions to Reach Every ...
Civil Society Engagement Practical Country Platform Solutions to Reach Every ...Civil Society Engagement Practical Country Platform Solutions to Reach Every ...
Civil Society Engagement Practical Country Platform Solutions to Reach Every ...
 
HMPRG Safety Net Initiative History- Lon Berkeley.
HMPRG Safety Net Initiative History- Lon Berkeley.HMPRG Safety Net Initiative History- Lon Berkeley.
HMPRG Safety Net Initiative History- Lon Berkeley.
 
Comments on the hhs strategic plan 2010
Comments on the hhs strategic plan 2010Comments on the hhs strategic plan 2010
Comments on the hhs strategic plan 2010
 
FWB_FinalReport_2006
FWB_FinalReport_2006FWB_FinalReport_2006
FWB_FinalReport_2006
 
A Framework for Healthcare and Public Health Collaboration: The Population He...
A Framework for Healthcare and Public Health Collaboration: The Population He...A Framework for Healthcare and Public Health Collaboration: The Population He...
A Framework for Healthcare and Public Health Collaboration: The Population He...
 
Medicaid Waiver: MI Choice Presentation
Medicaid Waiver: MI Choice Presentation Medicaid Waiver: MI Choice Presentation
Medicaid Waiver: MI Choice Presentation
 
Healthy Lives, Healthy People: The Public Health White Paper
Healthy Lives, Healthy People: The Public Health White Paper Healthy Lives, Healthy People: The Public Health White Paper
Healthy Lives, Healthy People: The Public Health White Paper
 
PCD_HECEPP_ResultsPaper_2015
PCD_HECEPP_ResultsPaper_2015PCD_HECEPP_ResultsPaper_2015
PCD_HECEPP_ResultsPaper_2015
 
HFHS 2016 CHNA
HFHS 2016 CHNAHFHS 2016 CHNA
HFHS 2016 CHNA
 
Moving towards health equity in ky update
Moving towards health equity in ky updateMoving towards health equity in ky update
Moving towards health equity in ky update
 
Driving Health Equity into Action: Policy Change and Community Mobilization t...
Driving Health Equity into Action: Policy Change and Community Mobilization t...Driving Health Equity into Action: Policy Change and Community Mobilization t...
Driving Health Equity into Action: Policy Change and Community Mobilization t...
 
MPS_civil_society_case_studies
MPS_civil_society_case_studiesMPS_civil_society_case_studies
MPS_civil_society_case_studies
 
WA DOH State Plan for Healthy Communities Recommended Changes - PowerPoint - ...
WA DOH State Plan for Healthy Communities Recommended Changes - PowerPoint - ...WA DOH State Plan for Healthy Communities Recommended Changes - PowerPoint - ...
WA DOH State Plan for Healthy Communities Recommended Changes - PowerPoint - ...
 
A retrospective review of the Honduras AIN-C program guided by a community he...
A retrospective review of the Honduras AIN-C program guided by a community he...A retrospective review of the Honduras AIN-C program guided by a community he...
A retrospective review of the Honduras AIN-C program guided by a community he...
 
RuralHealth-NDWhitePaper-AFTER
RuralHealth-NDWhitePaper-AFTERRuralHealth-NDWhitePaper-AFTER
RuralHealth-NDWhitePaper-AFTER
 
Substance Abuse Kent, Michigan
Substance Abuse Kent, MichiganSubstance Abuse Kent, Michigan
Substance Abuse Kent, Michigan
 
Community Health Worker Models: A Focus on Sustainability MOLLY CHRISTIANSEN
Community Health Worker Models: A Focus on Sustainability MOLLY CHRISTIANSENCommunity Health Worker Models: A Focus on Sustainability MOLLY CHRISTIANSEN
Community Health Worker Models: A Focus on Sustainability MOLLY CHRISTIANSEN
 
North-Kentucky-CHIP
North-Kentucky-CHIPNorth-Kentucky-CHIP
North-Kentucky-CHIP
 
Paving the Way: CLAS & Policy
Paving the Way: CLAS & PolicyPaving the Way: CLAS & Policy
Paving the Way: CLAS & Policy
 

Viewers also liked

Symphony No. 2 Ledger Score - Full Score (Transposing)
Symphony No. 2 Ledger Score - Full Score (Transposing)Symphony No. 2 Ledger Score - Full Score (Transposing)
Symphony No. 2 Ledger Score - Full Score (Transposing)Edgar Girtain
 
Plantilla de diseño
Plantilla de diseñoPlantilla de diseño
Plantilla de diseñomaraya2629
 
February 22, 2016 (73X)
February 22, 2016 (73X)February 22, 2016 (73X)
February 22, 2016 (73X)MelissaJLong
 
PRESENTACION MULTIMEDIA EN LA WEB TAREA 3.4 TIC
PRESENTACION MULTIMEDIA EN LA WEB TAREA 3.4 TICPRESENTACION MULTIMEDIA EN LA WEB TAREA 3.4 TIC
PRESENTACION MULTIMEDIA EN LA WEB TAREA 3.4 TICvilardelans
 
ASG Overview v4
ASG Overview v4ASG Overview v4
ASG Overview v4John Duke
 
De los libros a las computadoras
De los libros a las computadorasDe los libros a las computadoras
De los libros a las computadorasRuber Jimenez
 
Supervisors certificate
Supervisors certificateSupervisors certificate
Supervisors certificateMlu Tolo
 
Paulsen Gridlock Ad 2 350x250
Paulsen Gridlock Ad 2 350x250Paulsen Gridlock Ad 2 350x250
Paulsen Gridlock Ad 2 350x250Kelli Commers
 
List of References for Megan Luft
List of References for Megan LuftList of References for Megan Luft
List of References for Megan LuftMegan Luft
 
Certificate IV in Fitness SIS40210 AIPT Transcript P1 and 2
Certificate IV in Fitness SIS40210 AIPT Transcript P1 and 2Certificate IV in Fitness SIS40210 AIPT Transcript P1 and 2
Certificate IV in Fitness SIS40210 AIPT Transcript P1 and 2Ben Wildey
 

Viewers also liked (15)

Symphony No. 2 Ledger Score - Full Score (Transposing)
Symphony No. 2 Ledger Score - Full Score (Transposing)Symphony No. 2 Ledger Score - Full Score (Transposing)
Symphony No. 2 Ledger Score - Full Score (Transposing)
 
Plantilla de diseño
Plantilla de diseñoPlantilla de diseño
Plantilla de diseño
 
February 22, 2016 (73X)
February 22, 2016 (73X)February 22, 2016 (73X)
February 22, 2016 (73X)
 
Literatura exipcia platega
Literatura exipcia plategaLiteratura exipcia platega
Literatura exipcia platega
 
4 The Powhatans
4 The Powhatans4 The Powhatans
4 The Powhatans
 
PRESENTACION MULTIMEDIA EN LA WEB TAREA 3.4 TIC
PRESENTACION MULTIMEDIA EN LA WEB TAREA 3.4 TICPRESENTACION MULTIMEDIA EN LA WEB TAREA 3.4 TIC
PRESENTACION MULTIMEDIA EN LA WEB TAREA 3.4 TIC
 
Primera Guerra Mundial i Revolució Russa
Primera Guerra Mundial i Revolució RussaPrimera Guerra Mundial i Revolució Russa
Primera Guerra Mundial i Revolució Russa
 
ASG Overview v4
ASG Overview v4ASG Overview v4
ASG Overview v4
 
updated CV .
updated CV .updated CV .
updated CV .
 
De los libros a las computadoras
De los libros a las computadorasDe los libros a las computadoras
De los libros a las computadoras
 
Supervisors certificate
Supervisors certificateSupervisors certificate
Supervisors certificate
 
Paulsen Gridlock Ad 2 350x250
Paulsen Gridlock Ad 2 350x250Paulsen Gridlock Ad 2 350x250
Paulsen Gridlock Ad 2 350x250
 
List of References for Megan Luft
List of References for Megan LuftList of References for Megan Luft
List of References for Megan Luft
 
Magnetism Diagnos åk 5
Magnetism Diagnos åk 5Magnetism Diagnos åk 5
Magnetism Diagnos åk 5
 
Certificate IV in Fitness SIS40210 AIPT Transcript P1 and 2
Certificate IV in Fitness SIS40210 AIPT Transcript P1 and 2Certificate IV in Fitness SIS40210 AIPT Transcript P1 and 2
Certificate IV in Fitness SIS40210 AIPT Transcript P1 and 2
 

Similar to IPlanninizersofKaneCounty

Respond to this classmates like in the other posts you have done.docx
Respond to this classmates like in the other posts you have done.docxRespond to this classmates like in the other posts you have done.docx
Respond to this classmates like in the other posts you have done.docxinfantkimber
 
Stategic plan for the atcphd
Stategic plan for the atcphdStategic plan for the atcphd
Stategic plan for the atcphdFemi Popoola
 
Clay platte county needs assessment
Clay platte county needs assessmentClay platte county needs assessment
Clay platte county needs assessmentPHABexchange
 
2015-2019 ATCPHD Strategic Plan
2015-2019 ATCPHD Strategic Plan2015-2019 ATCPHD Strategic Plan
2015-2019 ATCPHD Strategic PlanDerrick L. Neal
 
Kent County Fact Sheet_FINAL
Kent County Fact Sheet_FINALKent County Fact Sheet_FINAL
Kent County Fact Sheet_FINALAbigail Anderson
 
Cook County Department of Public Health 2016 WePLAN 2020 Forces of Change Ass...
Cook County Department of Public Health 2016 WePLAN 2020 Forces of Change Ass...Cook County Department of Public Health 2016 WePLAN 2020 Forces of Change Ass...
Cook County Department of Public Health 2016 WePLAN 2020 Forces of Change Ass...Jim Bloyd
 
infant ec mh paper full document
infant ec mh paper full documentinfant ec mh paper full document
infant ec mh paper full documentCarla Denner, LCSW
 
Teagen Johnson: CHNA Dane County, WI: Creighton MPH602
Teagen Johnson: CHNA Dane County, WI: Creighton MPH602Teagen Johnson: CHNA Dane County, WI: Creighton MPH602
Teagen Johnson: CHNA Dane County, WI: Creighton MPH602Teagen Johnson
 
Tithing Intro Training
Tithing Intro TrainingTithing Intro Training
Tithing Intro Trainingwebmasterqol
 
BSheppard resume 2015 FINAL
BSheppard resume 2015 FINALBSheppard resume 2015 FINAL
BSheppard resume 2015 FINALBarbara Sheppard
 
Health Datapalooza 2013: Hearing from the Community - Jean Nudelman
Health Datapalooza 2013: Hearing from the Community - Jean NudelmanHealth Datapalooza 2013: Hearing from the Community - Jean Nudelman
Health Datapalooza 2013: Hearing from the Community - Jean NudelmanHealth Data Consortium
 
Driving Health Equity into Action at a Community Level
Driving Health Equity into Action at a Community Level Driving Health Equity into Action at a Community Level
Driving Health Equity into Action at a Community Level Wellesley Institute
 
Substance Abuse Osceola, Michigan
Substance Abuse Osceola, MichiganSubstance Abuse Osceola, Michigan
Substance Abuse Osceola, Michiganrecoveryrestart2
 
Substance Abuse Lake, Michigan
Substance Abuse Lake, MichiganSubstance Abuse Lake, Michigan
Substance Abuse Lake, Michiganrecoveryrestart2
 
AHA-IFD Equity of Care Slide Deck
AHA-IFD Equity of Care Slide DeckAHA-IFD Equity of Care Slide Deck
AHA-IFD Equity of Care Slide DeckTomas Leon
 

Similar to IPlanninizersofKaneCounty (20)

Respond to this classmates like in the other posts you have done.docx
Respond to this classmates like in the other posts you have done.docxRespond to this classmates like in the other posts you have done.docx
Respond to this classmates like in the other posts you have done.docx
 
Stategic plan for the atcphd
Stategic plan for the atcphdStategic plan for the atcphd
Stategic plan for the atcphd
 
Clay platte county needs assessment
Clay platte county needs assessmentClay platte county needs assessment
Clay platte county needs assessment
 
2015-2019 ATCPHD Strategic Plan
2015-2019 ATCPHD Strategic Plan2015-2019 ATCPHD Strategic Plan
2015-2019 ATCPHD Strategic Plan
 
Building a better a public health response system in Los Angeles County
Building a better a public health response system in Los Angeles CountyBuilding a better a public health response system in Los Angeles County
Building a better a public health response system in Los Angeles County
 
Kent County Fact Sheet_FINAL
Kent County Fact Sheet_FINALKent County Fact Sheet_FINAL
Kent County Fact Sheet_FINAL
 
Cook County Department of Public Health 2016 WePLAN 2020 Forces of Change Ass...
Cook County Department of Public Health 2016 WePLAN 2020 Forces of Change Ass...Cook County Department of Public Health 2016 WePLAN 2020 Forces of Change Ass...
Cook County Department of Public Health 2016 WePLAN 2020 Forces of Change Ass...
 
JAGS-0862-Final Oct 16 2014
JAGS-0862-Final Oct 16 2014JAGS-0862-Final Oct 16 2014
JAGS-0862-Final Oct 16 2014
 
Integrating personal and public health services in Los Angeles
Integrating personal and public health services in Los AngelesIntegrating personal and public health services in Los Angeles
Integrating personal and public health services in Los Angeles
 
infant ec mh paper full document
infant ec mh paper full documentinfant ec mh paper full document
infant ec mh paper full document
 
Teagen Johnson: CHNA Dane County, WI: Creighton MPH602
Teagen Johnson: CHNA Dane County, WI: Creighton MPH602Teagen Johnson: CHNA Dane County, WI: Creighton MPH602
Teagen Johnson: CHNA Dane County, WI: Creighton MPH602
 
Tithing Intro Training
Tithing Intro TrainingTithing Intro Training
Tithing Intro Training
 
BSheppard resume 2015 FINAL
BSheppard resume 2015 FINALBSheppard resume 2015 FINAL
BSheppard resume 2015 FINAL
 
Health Datapalooza 2013: Hearing from the Community - Jean Nudelman
Health Datapalooza 2013: Hearing from the Community - Jean NudelmanHealth Datapalooza 2013: Hearing from the Community - Jean Nudelman
Health Datapalooza 2013: Hearing from the Community - Jean Nudelman
 
Developing Healthy Eating Active Communities in the City of Baldwin Park
Developing Healthy Eating Active Communities in the City of Baldwin ParkDeveloping Healthy Eating Active Communities in the City of Baldwin Park
Developing Healthy Eating Active Communities in the City of Baldwin Park
 
Developing.Community.Liaising1.BPC
Developing.Community.Liaising1.BPCDeveloping.Community.Liaising1.BPC
Developing.Community.Liaising1.BPC
 
Driving Health Equity into Action at a Community Level
Driving Health Equity into Action at a Community Level Driving Health Equity into Action at a Community Level
Driving Health Equity into Action at a Community Level
 
Substance Abuse Osceola, Michigan
Substance Abuse Osceola, MichiganSubstance Abuse Osceola, Michigan
Substance Abuse Osceola, Michigan
 
Substance Abuse Lake, Michigan
Substance Abuse Lake, MichiganSubstance Abuse Lake, Michigan
Substance Abuse Lake, Michigan
 
AHA-IFD Equity of Care Slide Deck
AHA-IFD Equity of Care Slide DeckAHA-IFD Equity of Care Slide Deck
AHA-IFD Equity of Care Slide Deck
 

IPlanninizersofKaneCounty

  • 1. Running Head:IPLANNINIZERS IPLANninizers of Kane County Northern Illinois University PHHE 469-1 Irene Cruz (Organization Capacity Assessment) Chanelle Jones (Community Health Plan) Kevin McKenzie (Accessibility, Availability…) Omotola Okunuga (Reliability and Validity. . .) Shqiponja Zeneli (Community Health Needs Assessment) Organization Capacity Assessment
  • 2. IPLANNINIZERS 2 “The Illinois Project for Local Assessment of Needs (IPLAN) is a community health assessment and planning process that is conducted every five years by local health jurisdictions in Illinois. This is to help county improve their living rates in their area. This help developed different or more programs for their community to make residents more health. In Kane County, it is reference as Community Health Improvement Plan (CHIP). A Community Health Improvement Plan is a long-term, systematic effort to address health problems in a community based on results from a community health assessment. The plan recommends priorities for action and is used by health and other governmental, education, and social service agencies and organizations to implement policies and programs that promote health. The Kane County’s community health needs assessment is found within the required government IPLAN section. Kane County IPLAN, which is known as the CHIP (Community Health Improvement Plan), obeys to the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) requirements. Kane County’s CHIP met this requirement by conducting their assessment every five years as well as providing their goal for the next five years. The first thing for a IPLAN, is should be well put together it needs to have some type format that things are easy to find. Well organized, there should be pages number, subtitles listed and maybe a table of contents. Also known as capacity which means, the abstract term that describes a wide range of capabilities, knowledge, and resources that nonprofits need in order to be effective. According to Grantmakers for Effective Organizations, it is “the rededication to achieving results.” Organizational capacity is multi-faceted and continually evolving. Six components of organizational capacity are necessary for high performance: governance and
  • 3. IPLANNINIZERS 3 leadership; mission, vision, and strategy; program delivery and impact.; strategic relationships; resource development; and internal operations and management. In Kane’s CHIP, it is well put together from it’s title page to the reference page. There content meets all the state requirements that they are required to included. Someone could easy follow the format of the plan since it has the bold words when it is translation from different topics. Throughout the plan Timmreck’s “10-step Planning Model” is used in the development of their future goals. It goes really in depth with multiple sub- categories to express their thoughts within each group. Also to show how the past goals were meet or still being worked on. The purpose of the IPLAN is to be unique for its assigned area which Kane county has meet that goal. It starts with the reference of the documentation which is the CHIP unlike DeKalb’s which it is still IPLAN. I really like that in Kane’s there is color and many graphs which makes it more presentable. I would not mind working with Kane County’s since it looks to be more modernized unlike DeKalb’s which looks like a dull documentation. There is similar data presented but different ways of approaching it since they are different population. The community health needs assessment as stated by the CDC “identifies key health issues and needs through systematic data collection and analysis”. This assessment is known to determine the strengths and identify the weaknesses of Kane County. The community health needs assessment primarily serves as a structure to improve health problems within the county. Kane County states that their goal is to” identify areas where we can have the largest impact on improving the quality of life for all Kane residents – particularly the most vulnerable residents of our community – by reducing preventable sickness and death”(CHIP 2011). The
  • 4. IPLANNINIZERS 4 CHIP also described the process and outcomes of their listed priorities in order to meet the second mandate of IDPH. They perform this task by using the National Prevention Strategy. With this strategy Kane County was able to plan and assess their community Themes and Strengths and Public Health System Priorities. After reading the Kane County’s needs assessment, I have come to a conclusion that this assessment links best with Timmrecks’s “10- Step Planning Model”. This needs assessment relates to the Timmreck’s three core functions, assessment, policy development, and assurance. In addition, to the three core measures it also correlates with steps two and four from the model. Step two is known as the Assessment, organization, resources and review of regulations. CHIP 2011 looks into the internal and external assessments by affiliating the local hospital, United Way and the INC Board. Step four in Timmreck’s Model is the Needs Assessment. In this step Timmreck focuses on the process of identifying, completing, and evaluating the needs assessment. Kane County completes this step by holding focus groups and incorporating Northern Illinois University Public Opinion Laboratory. Once they compiled their needed data, Kane County evaluated it in order to come up with their major health priorities. Overall, the Kane County CHIP needs assessment seems to be much more detailed and in depth, compared to the DeKalb County IPLAN. The Kane County community health needs assessment has more data within the CHIP than DeKalb County does. The DeKalb County IPLAN has a simple layout and makes it easy to find each section. They also focused only on their three priorities whereas; Kane County looked into other factors that affect the county as well. Some factors that they took into consideration were socioeconomic status, access to healthcare, as well as their surrounding environments. Being able to incorporate these factors
  • 5. IPLANNINIZERS 5 into their major health priorities will allow them to develop programs in order to have a healthier county. I believe that both counties did a nice job laying out their IPLAN’s but it all depends on who has the supporting data, and Kane County did a much better job providing this information. This makes the Kane County CHIP more reliable and much more evidence based. The Kane County Community Health Improvement Plan (CHIP) is set to better Kane residents and help improve quality of life. The plan can be used by health professionals, the government, in educational settings, communities, social services, faith- based organizations and other identifying agencies where resources are used to improve one’s quality of life in Kane County (CHIP, 2011-2016). The plan includes four priorities and six health threats focusing on the causes contributing to the health issues people face every day. CHIP is not only focusing on access to medical care or behaviors but also on social, economic and environments that contribute to good health. Kane County believe the need to address these issues may result in “successful” population health. The four priorities are Support Health Behaviors that Promote Well-Being and Prevent Disease Priority, Increase Access to High Quality, Holistic Preventive and Treatment Services Across the Health Care System Priority, Support and Create Health Promoting Neighborhoods, Towns and Cities Priority, and Promote Social, Economic, and Educational Environments that Optimize Health. The six health threats that go along with this are obesity, chronic disease, infant mortality, childhood lead poisoning, communicable disease, and poor social and emotional wellness. According to Kane County a few of the goals for the first priority Support Health Behaviors that Promote Well-Being and Prevent Disease Priority, includes the reduction of tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke which has an effect on chronic
  • 6. IPLANNINIZERS 6 disease. People that don’t smoke are being exposed to hazardous tobacco smoke and needs to be protected by policies. Also, by increasing access and consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables it can help lower obesity rates, especially in low- income areas where fresh fruit and veggies may not be available. Coordinate the effective communication of tailored, accurate and actionable health information to Kane County residents across the lifespan, and create environments that prevent excessive consumption of alcohol. The second priority Increase Access to High Quality, Holistic Preventive and Treatment Services across the Health Care System, includes increasing the proportion of residents of all ages that have regular, ongoing sources of medical and dental care as well as increasing the proportion of residents of all ages who receive appropriate, evidence- based clinical preventive services. Also, it focuses culturally appropriate outreach and engagement efforts to eliminate racial disparities in health outcomes, especially in infant mortality. It enhances systems to support the prevention, early identification and treatment of communicable diseases in the community. Lastly, it enhances systems to support the prevention, early identification and evidence-based treatment of mental health conditions. Priority three Support & Create Health Promoting Neighborhoods, Towns & Cities goals includes Increase the availability and variety of high quality, safe and affordable housing and compact, mixed use developments by Instituting “complete streets” types of policies to ensure that roadways are designed and operated with all users in mind - including bicyclists, public transportation vehicles and riders, and pedestrians of all ages and abilities. Assure access to safe playgrounds, parks, trails and open space. Assure access to safe food and clean and safe water and air. The fourth priority is to Promote Social, Economic and Educational Environments that Optimize Health by increasing the proportion of children who have high quality early developmental support, especially in child care and education and by increasing the proportion of Kane County young
  • 7. IPLANNINIZERS 7 people that complete high school education as well as increasing the job skills and readiness of Kane County residents that is unemployed (CHIP 2011-2016). The Kane county Community health improvement plan wants to ensure that the accessibility, availability, and acceptability of the plan is able to reach each individual of the county wanting to find any information or data relevant to Kane County. The overall accessibility of the Kane county IPLAN is easy to find and access all the health and data you are wishing to find as the County’s IPLAN is found online on the Kane County health department's website which is www.kanehealth.com. For being an individual with no knowledge of IPLANs, or minimal health and data knowledge finding the website and the actual IPLAN was rather difficult as they call it the Community Health Improvement Plan(CHIP) rather than IPLAN which led to confusion when searching for their IPLAN. Once we found their IPLAN all the data and information we needed was found on a downloadable pdf file on their main page. Included on that page was multiple live links with other useful data sets, executive summaries about other assessments the kane county health department has done previously, as well as having a website that has all their assessments and data sets together in what seemed to be a one drive or even something similar to dropbox. The Availability of the IPLAN is available to any individual with the basic technological requirements in today’s society. Majority of individuals have smart phones, computers, and the access to emails through one of the many apps they have on their phone so that makes accessing the available information provided online from Kane County Health Department in regards to their IPLAN and other health related issues easy as well. For those who don’t have access to smartphones or a computer they can still access the information available in the IPLAN by calling or by even physically stopping in to the Health department to speak to a representative or even ask to have a physical hard copy of the information you are requesting or the entire IPLAN. Once you have the IPLAN document the availability to any health issues or data is easily available and is easy to find as the document is easy to read and follow as well as find any data or information you are looking for within the document.
  • 8. IPLANNINIZERS 8 The Kane County IPLAN follows all the required information and regulations from the Illinois Department of Public Health when completing their community assessments every five years. This helps make the County’s IPLAN Acceptable for not only the county itself but for the individuals living there as well. Within the County IPLAN they have included an Executive summary detailing the document briefly and what all goes into it and what you may find while reading over the material. The document also has a table of contents with appendix’s listed at the end with data sets, tables, and graphs charting data and comparing information from previous years. The items throughout the document are easy to follow and seem to be in logical order and won’t confuse the reader as they read over the material and analyze the data sets. When comparing the Kane County IPLAN to the Dekalb County IPLAN I found that when searching for the IPLAN for either county Dekalb County’s was easier to find as all i had to do was google search the name or even just access the website dekalbcounty.gov/health/ and under Administration tab it has its own link to the county’s IPLAN which may be a little more difficult as I wouldnt think administration would category id class the IPLAN under. The Dekalb County IPLAN I feel wasn’t as easy to read as the Kane county IPLAN but when it came to content and the accessibility and availability of the information provided in either document they are almost on the same level when it comes to quality and ease of access if you were an individual with minimal to no knowledge about healthcare and IPLANs. One thing about the Dekalb County IPLAN that is different than Kane County’s IPLAN is that Dekalb County’s IPLAN has a much larger table of contents and information included into their IPLAN than Kane County which I feel can either be a good or bad thing when it comes to analyzing data but may confuse the reader as they might feel overwhelmed by all the data and information included within the report. According to AFMC Primer on Population Health, “Reliability refers to dependability or consistency” while Validity “does the test measure what we are intending to measure?” So basically, Reliability is based on how consistent and dependable either a plan or an individual can be. And Validity is how valid a plan or a measurement we intend on measuring are. AFMC Primer on Population Health also states that, “there is no single approach to measuring validity:
  • 9. IPLANNINIZERS 9 the approach varies according to the purpose of the measurement and the sources of measurement error you wish to detect. In medicine, the commonest way to assess validity is to compare the measurement with a more extensive clinical or pathological examination of the patient. This is called criterion validation, because it compares the measurement to a full work- up that is considered a "gold standard" criterion. This is used where the measurement offers a brief and simple way to assess the patient’s condition, and our question is: How well does this simple method predict the results of a full and detailed (and also expensive, perhaps invasive) examination? On this project, one of the criteria I would be discussing about is Reliability and Validity of Data Set Information which is already stated above, definitions, and the use of this criteria. In regards to Kane County IPLAN, on page 12 of Kane County 2012-2016 Community Health Improvement Plan, it states that they are required to conduct a “community health assessments every 3-5years”. So basically, there mandated data set to be done every two years. The data set include to “adopt an implementation strategy”, implement a program to help promote and protect the health of the public and community by developing the quality of al health department throughout the United States and national public health departments. So therefore, the data set does support the goal and objectives stated. The key objective according to Kane County 2012-2016 Community Health Improvement IPLAN, “is to integrate for Health Impact Assessment as part of projects, plans, and policies at the county and municipal level.” And also, the data sets provided is set to be used every two years but the one used presently is about four years old. Perhaps, this is between four years season for a reason. Plans and projects for a long term was mapped out to avoid being
  • 10. IPLANNINIZERS 10 assessed every two years but instead include updates when needed. In DeKalb County’s IPLAN, they seem to be focusing on the broader view of improving Public Health County wide. DeKalb purpose of IPLAN states that, “it’s a planning process that is based on the Assessment Protocol for Excellent in Public Health (APEXPH)” by which they would developing public health organizations worldwide. According to the DeKalb County Health Department: Illinois Project for Local Assessments of Needs (IPLAN), DeKalb County provide the following tasks, “commitment to improving the health of health county, willingness to maintain a county-wide perspective, willingness to provide the required time, and ability to represent an important perspective, organization, or sector of the county” all this are their primary objective to improving Public Health but specifically “identify and prioritize health problems in accordance with the IPLAN process, present their perspective in discussions, balancing those views with a county-wide perspective, and finally participate in the development and recommendation of a health plan for the county”. Three reasons why I think DeKalb county’s is better, first, they work towards improving Public Health worldwide, potential priorities are visible, and lastly, IPLAN is well arranged and easy to access to grab on the important information’s needed. Easy accessibility, valid, and reliable to the community to follow along with. This is what I call “transparency” by which the entire county has an idea what is going on within. Unfortunately, the data set are set at exactly at the range of four years difference. Their data is reliable in the sense that it’s very dependable, more resourceful, and fully detailed in their IPLAN in year 2002. As we know that validity, is questioning if the test measure Access to
  • 11. IPLANNINIZERS 11 Health Care (Access to specialty care), Maternal and Child Health (Infant mortality), Chronic Disease (Cardiovascular diseases), Access to Mental Health Services, and Public Health Maintenance of Effort”, according to Kane County 2006 Community Health Improvement IPLAN. With statement it clearly states to what measure they are planning to reach and implement healthy food productions. Not only that but also redevelopment housing authority, community gardens, sidewalks, and bike lanes. Lastly, the most important reason why both reliability and validity is important in an IPLAN is because reliability states the consistency of change and resources that could be dependable for future reference while validity is knowing what to measure and question if you’re measuring what is really needed to be measured. Also the concept of transparency helps to keep whole county as whole in the loop and follow with assessments.
  • 12. IPLANNINIZERS 12 References 2000 GEN-GEO Conference. (Grantmakers Evaluation Network and Grantmakers for Effective Organizations, 2000) AFMC Primer on Population Health: The Association of Facilities of Medicine of Canada http://phprimer.afmc.ca/Part2MethodsStudyingHealth/Chapter6MethodsMeasuringHealth /Reliabilityandvalidityofhealthmeasures Community Health Improvement Plan. (n.d.). Retrieved November 10, 2015, from http://kanehealth.com/chip.htm DeKalb County Health Department: Illinois Project for Local Assessments of Needs (IPLAN), March 26 2013. http://dekalbcounty.org/health/administration/pdf/IPLANassess.pdf IPLAN. (n.d.). Retrieved November 9, 2015, from http://dekalbcounty.org/health/admin istration/IPLAN.html Illinois Project for Local Assessment of Needs (IPLAN). (n.d.). Retrieved November 5, 2015, from http://app.idph.state.il.us/ Kane County 2012-2016 Community Health Improvement IPLAN. http://kanehealth.com/PDFs/CHIP/CHIP-short.pdf Kane County Community Needs Assessment and Community Health Plan, 2006 http://kanehealth.com/PDFs/Planning/IPLAN/The2006IPLAN.pdf Kane County Population Estimates, Feb. 2007 by IPLAN Databook 2006/Charts http://kanehealth.com/PDFs/Planning/IPLAN/IPLANDatabook2006.pdf