SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
Download to read offline
We thank all the marmoteers, since 2001, who have helped collect these data. D.T.B was supported by the National Geographic
Society, UCLA (Faculty Senate and the Division of Life Sciences), a Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory research fellowship, and by
the NSF (IDBR-0754247 and DEB-1119660 to D.T.B., as well as DBI 0242960 and 0731346 to the Rocky Mountain Biological
Laboratory). J.E.S. was supported by funds from Faculty Development Funds and from the Provost’s Office at Mills College as well as
by fellowships from the American Association of University Women, the Institute for Society and Genetics at the University of California
Los Angeles, and the American Philosophical Society.
GRAPHICS: www.adamspestcontrol.com; www.ironphoenix.org
a Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
b Department of Biology, Mills College, Oakland, CA,USA
c The Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, Crested Butte, CO, USA
Fitness & hormonal correlates of social and ecological stressors in
wild yellow-bellied marmot females
Vertebrates’ stress responses can be measured by
glucocorticoid (GC) hormones.
GC Production varies among species & can be
influenced by:
 Reproductively dominant females can be more
stressed to maintain their position
 Reproductively subordinate females can be more
stressed because of violence from reproductively
dominant females
However, individuals with higher FGM had
increased reproductive success. This suggests that
the reproductive skew may be due to factors other
than social rank, such as body mass, colony size,
or predator abundance.
Higher FGM levels =
• More likely to
reproduce
• Larger litter sizes
• Lower social rank
Higher social rank =
• Lower FGM levels
• Larger litter size
Larger colonies =
• Higher FGM levels
• More likely to
• reproduce
• Larger litters
(Graphed on right)
More predators =
• Higher FGM levels
• Less likely to
reproduce
Two year olds =
• Higher FGM levels
• Less likely to
reproduce
Increased mass
previous year =
• Higher FGM levels
• More likely to
reproduce
• Larger litters
Perhaps, in species like marmots (that only
have a single chance per year to reproduce),
reproductive suppression should be rare and
social interactions won’t affect reproductive
success.
What is the relationship between female social
rank and stress in adult females? Is stress
associated with reproductive success?
Kathryn N. Keeley a, Jennifer E. Smith b, & Daniel T. Blumstein a, c
We used long-term data
on yellow-bellied
marmots (YBM; Marmota
flaviventris). YBMs live in
dominance hierarchical
societies with ~50
females in each colony.
𝑪𝑩𝑰 =
(𝑩 + 𝒃 + 𝟏)
(𝑳 + 𝒍 + 𝟏)
B = number of “losers” that the individual has “beaten”
b = number of marmots that the “losers” (B) have “beaten”
L = number of “winners” that have “beaten” the individual
l = number of marmots that have “beaten” the “winners” (L)
YBM were live-
trapped & marked in
the field. Information
& fecal samples were
collected.
• Observe YBM for agonistic behavior
(aggression & accompanied by
biting, chasing, or fighting)
• Record “winners” & “losers” of each
interaction
GC levels were extracted from YBM feces. We called
these Fecal Glucocorticoid Metabolites (FGM) Social
rank hierarchies were calculated with the Clutton-Brock
Index (CBI):
Our models included 9 fixed effects, including:
body mass, predator abundance, age,
and colony size
Lower-ranking females had relatively
higher GC levels and had smaller litters
compared to higher-ranking females
Predator abundance may have sublethal effects on
prey by creating a predator-induced “stress”
Body mass from the previous year indicated that
dominant females may be in better body condition
than their subordinates due to increased access to
resources.
Body condition (e.g. body mass)
Ecology (e.g. predators, food availability)
Sociality (e.g. social rank within group)
 Subordinates may have higher GC (i.e.
because of harassment, lack of resources, etc)
 Dominants may have higher GC (i.e. to
maintain social rank)
 May be no relationship between rank & GC
Not all individuals breed or produce surviving
offspring & GCs may be a mechanism of this
reproductive failure.
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
260
-0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1
Fecalglucocorticoidmetabolites
(ng/gfeces)
Numberofpupssurvivingto
weaning
Relative social rank of adult females
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
low FCMs
large colony
low FCMs
small colony
high FGMs
large colony
high FGMs
small colony
Proportionofadultfemalesthat
reproduced
N = 68 N = 30 N = 116 N = 44
The Effect of FGM and Colony Size on
Reproduction
The Effect of FGM and Rank on Reproductive
Success
We studied 5
colonies in
Gunnison
County, CO from
2003-2011.
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
Low Heavy
#pupssurvivingtoweaning
0.46
0.48
0.50
0.52
0.54
0.56
0.58
0.60
0.62
low predation high predation
Proportionofadultfemales
thatreproduced
N = 122 N = 151
Number pups weaned
increases with body mass
from the previous year
Females reproduce less with
high predator abundance
N = 139 N = 134

More Related Content

What's hot

IB Diploma BLOA - Behavioural Genetics
IB Diploma BLOA - Behavioural GeneticsIB Diploma BLOA - Behavioural Genetics
IB Diploma BLOA - Behavioural GeneticsLauraSw
 
Bio evolution
Bio evolutionBio evolution
Bio evolutionssealey
 
factors affecting allele frequencies
factors affecting allele  frequenciesfactors affecting allele  frequencies
factors affecting allele frequenciestammi-1990
 
Variation & Evolution
Variation & EvolutionVariation & Evolution
Variation & EvolutionBeth Lee
 
Evolution final
Evolution finalEvolution final
Evolution finalJesmin55
 
Ch 6.3 evidence of evolution
Ch 6.3 evidence of evolution Ch 6.3 evidence of evolution
Ch 6.3 evidence of evolution sekuhar
 
The evolution of kin selection
The evolution of kin selectionThe evolution of kin selection
The evolution of kin selectionadityakuroodi
 
Mechanisms of Evolution: Population Selection and Change
Mechanisms of Evolution: Population Selection and ChangeMechanisms of Evolution: Population Selection and Change
Mechanisms of Evolution: Population Selection and ChangePaulVMcDowell
 
1st 4th 5th Final Review
1st 4th 5th Final Review1st 4th 5th Final Review
1st 4th 5th Final ReviewC Meador
 
The effects of bot fly parasitism on aggressive behavior in Peromyscus leucopus
The effects of bot fly parasitism on aggressive behavior in Peromyscus leucopusThe effects of bot fly parasitism on aggressive behavior in Peromyscus leucopus
The effects of bot fly parasitism on aggressive behavior in Peromyscus leucopusgsabrinus
 
Developmental mechanisms of evolutionary change
Developmental mechanisms of evolutionary changeDevelopmental mechanisms of evolutionary change
Developmental mechanisms of evolutionary changeMerlyn Denesia
 
anthropology lab reports
anthropology lab reports anthropology lab reports
anthropology lab reports daveson700
 
4 behavioral genetics and evolutionary psychology
4 behavioral genetics and evolutionary psychology4 behavioral genetics and evolutionary psychology
4 behavioral genetics and evolutionary psychologySOAccidents
 

What's hot (20)

IB Diploma BLOA - Behavioural Genetics
IB Diploma BLOA - Behavioural GeneticsIB Diploma BLOA - Behavioural Genetics
IB Diploma BLOA - Behavioural Genetics
 
BOOBIES_Megedit
BOOBIES_MegeditBOOBIES_Megedit
BOOBIES_Megedit
 
Bio evolution
Bio evolutionBio evolution
Bio evolution
 
factors affecting allele frequencies
factors affecting allele  frequenciesfactors affecting allele  frequencies
factors affecting allele frequencies
 
Natural selection
Natural selectionNatural selection
Natural selection
 
Lec13 Mating Systems
Lec13 Mating SystemsLec13 Mating Systems
Lec13 Mating Systems
 
Fisher theory
Fisher theoryFisher theory
Fisher theory
 
Unit 12 Mechanisms For Evolution
Unit 12 Mechanisms For EvolutionUnit 12 Mechanisms For Evolution
Unit 12 Mechanisms For Evolution
 
Mr. Hunter Ch. 3
Mr. Hunter Ch. 3Mr. Hunter Ch. 3
Mr. Hunter Ch. 3
 
Variation & Evolution
Variation & EvolutionVariation & Evolution
Variation & Evolution
 
Evolution final
Evolution finalEvolution final
Evolution final
 
Ch 6.3 evidence of evolution
Ch 6.3 evidence of evolution Ch 6.3 evidence of evolution
Ch 6.3 evidence of evolution
 
The evolution of kin selection
The evolution of kin selectionThe evolution of kin selection
The evolution of kin selection
 
Mechanisms of Evolution: Population Selection and Change
Mechanisms of Evolution: Population Selection and ChangeMechanisms of Evolution: Population Selection and Change
Mechanisms of Evolution: Population Selection and Change
 
1st 4th 5th Final Review
1st 4th 5th Final Review1st 4th 5th Final Review
1st 4th 5th Final Review
 
The effects of bot fly parasitism on aggressive behavior in Peromyscus leucopus
The effects of bot fly parasitism on aggressive behavior in Peromyscus leucopusThe effects of bot fly parasitism on aggressive behavior in Peromyscus leucopus
The effects of bot fly parasitism on aggressive behavior in Peromyscus leucopus
 
Developmental mechanisms of evolutionary change
Developmental mechanisms of evolutionary changeDevelopmental mechanisms of evolutionary change
Developmental mechanisms of evolutionary change
 
anthropology lab reports
anthropology lab reports anthropology lab reports
anthropology lab reports
 
4 behavioral genetics and evolutionary psychology
4 behavioral genetics and evolutionary psychology4 behavioral genetics and evolutionary psychology
4 behavioral genetics and evolutionary psychology
 
Mechanism of Evolution
Mechanism of EvolutionMechanism of Evolution
Mechanism of Evolution
 

Similar to Marmot Social Stress and Reproduction

Blumstein et al_2016
Blumstein et al_2016Blumstein et al_2016
Blumstein et al_2016Kate
 
Lesson 6_Ethology_behavioural_ecology_human_behaviour.ppt
Lesson 6_Ethology_behavioural_ecology_human_behaviour.pptLesson 6_Ethology_behavioural_ecology_human_behaviour.ppt
Lesson 6_Ethology_behavioural_ecology_human_behaviour.pptmidolyon1990gmailcom
 
POPULATION ECOLOGYBASIC DEFINITIONSPOPU.docx
POPULATION ECOLOGYBASIC DEFINITIONSPOPU.docxPOPULATION ECOLOGYBASIC DEFINITIONSPOPU.docx
POPULATION ECOLOGYBASIC DEFINITIONSPOPU.docxharrisonhoward80223
 
CHAPTER 7Primate BehaviorWhat is Meant By Behavior.docx
CHAPTER 7Primate BehaviorWhat is Meant By Behavior.docxCHAPTER 7Primate BehaviorWhat is Meant By Behavior.docx
CHAPTER 7Primate BehaviorWhat is Meant By Behavior.docxmccormicknadine86
 
CHAPTER 7Primate BehaviorWhat is Meant By Behavior.docx
CHAPTER 7Primate BehaviorWhat is Meant By Behavior.docxCHAPTER 7Primate BehaviorWhat is Meant By Behavior.docx
CHAPTER 7Primate BehaviorWhat is Meant By Behavior.docxrobertad6
 
Evolve 7
Evolve 7Evolve 7
Evolve 7zmiers
 
Evolution and the Fate of Humanity
Evolution and the Fate of HumanityEvolution and the Fate of Humanity
Evolution and the Fate of HumanityLawrence Wood
 
Eusocial behaviour.pptx
Eusocial behaviour.pptxEusocial behaviour.pptx
Eusocial behaviour.pptxalkanokhwal
 
Concepts of Evolution.pptx
Concepts of Evolution.pptxConcepts of Evolution.pptx
Concepts of Evolution.pptxAbhijit Dutta
 
IntroductionDarwin argused that living organisms evolved from one .pdf
IntroductionDarwin argused that living organisms evolved from one .pdfIntroductionDarwin argused that living organisms evolved from one .pdf
IntroductionDarwin argused that living organisms evolved from one .pdfanugrahafancy
 

Similar to Marmot Social Stress and Reproduction (20)

Blumstein et al_2016
Blumstein et al_2016Blumstein et al_2016
Blumstein et al_2016
 
Lesson 6_Ethology_behavioural_ecology_human_behaviour.ppt
Lesson 6_Ethology_behavioural_ecology_human_behaviour.pptLesson 6_Ethology_behavioural_ecology_human_behaviour.ppt
Lesson 6_Ethology_behavioural_ecology_human_behaviour.ppt
 
Chapter 3 ap psych- Nature & Nurture
Chapter 3 ap psych- Nature & NurtureChapter 3 ap psych- Nature & Nurture
Chapter 3 ap psych- Nature & Nurture
 
POPULATION ECOLOGYBASIC DEFINITIONSPOPU.docx
POPULATION ECOLOGYBASIC DEFINITIONSPOPU.docxPOPULATION ECOLOGYBASIC DEFINITIONSPOPU.docx
POPULATION ECOLOGYBASIC DEFINITIONSPOPU.docx
 
CHAPTER 7Primate BehaviorWhat is Meant By Behavior.docx
CHAPTER 7Primate BehaviorWhat is Meant By Behavior.docxCHAPTER 7Primate BehaviorWhat is Meant By Behavior.docx
CHAPTER 7Primate BehaviorWhat is Meant By Behavior.docx
 
CHAPTER 7Primate BehaviorWhat is Meant By Behavior.docx
CHAPTER 7Primate BehaviorWhat is Meant By Behavior.docxCHAPTER 7Primate BehaviorWhat is Meant By Behavior.docx
CHAPTER 7Primate BehaviorWhat is Meant By Behavior.docx
 
W-4-MECHANISM.pptx
W-4-MECHANISM.pptxW-4-MECHANISM.pptx
W-4-MECHANISM.pptx
 
Evolve 7
Evolve 7Evolve 7
Evolve 7
 
researchposter
researchposterresearchposter
researchposter
 
Evolution and the Fate of Humanity
Evolution and the Fate of HumanityEvolution and the Fate of Humanity
Evolution and the Fate of Humanity
 
Presentation on Selection
Presentation on SelectionPresentation on Selection
Presentation on Selection
 
9e ch 03 nature nuture
9e ch 03 nature nuture9e ch 03 nature nuture
9e ch 03 nature nuture
 
Eusocial behaviour.pptx
Eusocial behaviour.pptxEusocial behaviour.pptx
Eusocial behaviour.pptx
 
301_A3-2
301_A3-2301_A3-2
301_A3-2
 
breed.pptx
breed.pptxbreed.pptx
breed.pptx
 
07 pop bio
07 pop bio07 pop bio
07 pop bio
 
Concepts of Evolution.pptx
Concepts of Evolution.pptxConcepts of Evolution.pptx
Concepts of Evolution.pptx
 
CH 4 Nature Nurture
CH 4 Nature NurtureCH 4 Nature Nurture
CH 4 Nature Nurture
 
BASIC GENDER SENSITIVITY TRAINING
BASIC GENDER SENSITIVITY TRAININGBASIC GENDER SENSITIVITY TRAINING
BASIC GENDER SENSITIVITY TRAINING
 
IntroductionDarwin argused that living organisms evolved from one .pdf
IntroductionDarwin argused that living organisms evolved from one .pdfIntroductionDarwin argused that living organisms evolved from one .pdf
IntroductionDarwin argused that living organisms evolved from one .pdf
 

More from Kate

The Species Reintroduction Toolbox
The Species Reintroduction ToolboxThe Species Reintroduction Toolbox
The Species Reintroduction ToolboxKate
 
Geog170 finalproject mtnlions
Geog170 finalproject mtnlionsGeog170 finalproject mtnlions
Geog170 finalproject mtnlionsKate
 
Keeley et al_02-15
Keeley et al_02-15Keeley et al_02-15
Keeley et al_02-15Kate
 
Fuong et al._09-14_Animal Behaviour
Fuong et al._09-14_Animal BehaviourFuong et al._09-14_Animal Behaviour
Fuong et al._09-14_Animal BehaviourKate
 
SAFposter_final
SAFposter_finalSAFposter_final
SAFposter_finalKate
 
scienceposterday2015_kkeeley_direwolfv6
scienceposterday2015_kkeeley_direwolfv6scienceposterday2015_kkeeley_direwolfv6
scienceposterday2015_kkeeley_direwolfv6Kate
 

More from Kate (6)

The Species Reintroduction Toolbox
The Species Reintroduction ToolboxThe Species Reintroduction Toolbox
The Species Reintroduction Toolbox
 
Geog170 finalproject mtnlions
Geog170 finalproject mtnlionsGeog170 finalproject mtnlions
Geog170 finalproject mtnlions
 
Keeley et al_02-15
Keeley et al_02-15Keeley et al_02-15
Keeley et al_02-15
 
Fuong et al._09-14_Animal Behaviour
Fuong et al._09-14_Animal BehaviourFuong et al._09-14_Animal Behaviour
Fuong et al._09-14_Animal Behaviour
 
SAFposter_final
SAFposter_finalSAFposter_final
SAFposter_final
 
scienceposterday2015_kkeeley_direwolfv6
scienceposterday2015_kkeeley_direwolfv6scienceposterday2015_kkeeley_direwolfv6
scienceposterday2015_kkeeley_direwolfv6
 

Marmot Social Stress and Reproduction

  • 1. We thank all the marmoteers, since 2001, who have helped collect these data. D.T.B was supported by the National Geographic Society, UCLA (Faculty Senate and the Division of Life Sciences), a Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory research fellowship, and by the NSF (IDBR-0754247 and DEB-1119660 to D.T.B., as well as DBI 0242960 and 0731346 to the Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory). J.E.S. was supported by funds from Faculty Development Funds and from the Provost’s Office at Mills College as well as by fellowships from the American Association of University Women, the Institute for Society and Genetics at the University of California Los Angeles, and the American Philosophical Society. GRAPHICS: www.adamspestcontrol.com; www.ironphoenix.org a Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA b Department of Biology, Mills College, Oakland, CA,USA c The Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, Crested Butte, CO, USA Fitness & hormonal correlates of social and ecological stressors in wild yellow-bellied marmot females Vertebrates’ stress responses can be measured by glucocorticoid (GC) hormones. GC Production varies among species & can be influenced by:  Reproductively dominant females can be more stressed to maintain their position  Reproductively subordinate females can be more stressed because of violence from reproductively dominant females However, individuals with higher FGM had increased reproductive success. This suggests that the reproductive skew may be due to factors other than social rank, such as body mass, colony size, or predator abundance. Higher FGM levels = • More likely to reproduce • Larger litter sizes • Lower social rank Higher social rank = • Lower FGM levels • Larger litter size Larger colonies = • Higher FGM levels • More likely to • reproduce • Larger litters (Graphed on right) More predators = • Higher FGM levels • Less likely to reproduce Two year olds = • Higher FGM levels • Less likely to reproduce Increased mass previous year = • Higher FGM levels • More likely to reproduce • Larger litters Perhaps, in species like marmots (that only have a single chance per year to reproduce), reproductive suppression should be rare and social interactions won’t affect reproductive success. What is the relationship between female social rank and stress in adult females? Is stress associated with reproductive success? Kathryn N. Keeley a, Jennifer E. Smith b, & Daniel T. Blumstein a, c We used long-term data on yellow-bellied marmots (YBM; Marmota flaviventris). YBMs live in dominance hierarchical societies with ~50 females in each colony. 𝑪𝑩𝑰 = (𝑩 + 𝒃 + 𝟏) (𝑳 + 𝒍 + 𝟏) B = number of “losers” that the individual has “beaten” b = number of marmots that the “losers” (B) have “beaten” L = number of “winners” that have “beaten” the individual l = number of marmots that have “beaten” the “winners” (L) YBM were live- trapped & marked in the field. Information & fecal samples were collected. • Observe YBM for agonistic behavior (aggression & accompanied by biting, chasing, or fighting) • Record “winners” & “losers” of each interaction GC levels were extracted from YBM feces. We called these Fecal Glucocorticoid Metabolites (FGM) Social rank hierarchies were calculated with the Clutton-Brock Index (CBI): Our models included 9 fixed effects, including: body mass, predator abundance, age, and colony size Lower-ranking females had relatively higher GC levels and had smaller litters compared to higher-ranking females Predator abundance may have sublethal effects on prey by creating a predator-induced “stress” Body mass from the previous year indicated that dominant females may be in better body condition than their subordinates due to increased access to resources. Body condition (e.g. body mass) Ecology (e.g. predators, food availability) Sociality (e.g. social rank within group)  Subordinates may have higher GC (i.e. because of harassment, lack of resources, etc)  Dominants may have higher GC (i.e. to maintain social rank)  May be no relationship between rank & GC Not all individuals breed or produce surviving offspring & GCs may be a mechanism of this reproductive failure. 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 -0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 Fecalglucocorticoidmetabolites (ng/gfeces) Numberofpupssurvivingto weaning Relative social rank of adult females 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 low FCMs large colony low FCMs small colony high FGMs large colony high FGMs small colony Proportionofadultfemalesthat reproduced N = 68 N = 30 N = 116 N = 44 The Effect of FGM and Colony Size on Reproduction The Effect of FGM and Rank on Reproductive Success We studied 5 colonies in Gunnison County, CO from 2003-2011. 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 Low Heavy #pupssurvivingtoweaning 0.46 0.48 0.50 0.52 0.54 0.56 0.58 0.60 0.62 low predation high predation Proportionofadultfemales thatreproduced N = 122 N = 151 Number pups weaned increases with body mass from the previous year Females reproduce less with high predator abundance N = 139 N = 134