SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Download to read offline
MILLAN JIMENEZ, Julice
140701
MILLAN JIMENEZ, Julice
General Analysis
06 April 2016
Name on Documentation:
Date:
SpanTran Number:
Name on Application:
Date of Birth:
Type of Evaluation:
12/23/1986
#
Prepared by:
Ildiko Bors /
Comments:
AM
Senior Credentials Evaluator
Issuing Office - Houston, TX
RECOMMENDED U.S. EDUCATIONAL EQUIVALENCY: Bachelor of Science in Petroleum
Engineering from a regionally-accredited institution of higher education in the United
States.
Records pertaining to this file will be retained until 4/6/2021.
Diploma, issued October 21, 2010, conferring Title of Petroleum Engineering (Título de
Ingeniero de Petróleo)
Received
5 years beyond 11 years of elementary-secondary education
Cumana, Venezuela
Universidad de Oriente
Verification:
CREDENTIAL I OF I
Documentation:
Length of Program:
Institution:
Location:
Educational System:
Suggested U.S.
Equivalency:
Bachelor of Science in Petroleum Engineering from a regionally-accredited institution of
higher education in the United States.
CREDENTIAL I DETAILS
Institution Description:
Foreign Credential: Título de Ingeniero de Petróleo, 2010
Undergraduate admission in Venezuela requires the título de bachiller / secondary school diploma which marks the completion
of 11 to 12 years of school education. Técnico superior universitario / higher university technician programs, completed at
intermediate post-secondary institutions, require 3 years / 6 semesters of full-time study. Licenciatura / licentiate and título /
professional title programs, completed at university-level institutions, require 4 to 5 years (usually 5); human medicine requires
6 to 7 years. Graduate admission requires a título / licenciatura. Spanish is the principal language of instruction. Grade
scales vary by institution.
The University of the East, founded in 1958, is a bona fide public institution of tertiary education in Venezuela. The grade
scale is based on 9 with 5 as minimum passing grade: 9 = 4.00/A, 7- 8 = 3.00/B, 5 - 6 = 2.00/C, below 5 = 0.00/F. An alternate
grading scale is based on zero to ten, with five as the minimum passing grade, converted as: 10 = 4.00/A, 9 = 3.67 / A-, 8 =
3.33/B+, 7 = 3.00/B, 6 = 2.67/B-, and 5 = 2.00/C.
This evaluation is advisory only. The recipient retains the right to accept, modify or reject the recommendations
listed herein.
v
This file will be retained for five years from the date of file initiation. Inquiries about this evaluation must be
submitted in writing within thirty days of the date listed at the top of page one of the evaluation.
v
SpanTran: The Evaluation Company is a member of the National Association of Credential Evaluation Services /
NACES.
v
SPANTRAN NO. : 140701 * Page 1 of 2
General Information and Policy Statements for Evaluation and Translation Services
Located in Houston, Texas, New York, New York, and Miami, Florida (Intake Office), SpanTran: the Evaluation Company referred
to herein as SpanTran, provides translations and credential(s) evaluations, SpanTran was incorporated in Texas in 1989. SpanTran
employs A.T.A. certified translator(s). In 1996, SpanTran joined the National Association of Credential Evaluation Services /
NACES® as a regular member.
SpanTran does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, handicap, religion, sex, national origin, or age. Nevertheless, as a private
company not supported by any governmental / public funds, SpanTran retains the right to decline to provide services.
SpanTran is not responsible for the content, legibility, accuracy, and authenticity of translated documents. Nevertheless, SpanTran
does not knowingly translate / evaluate falsified or altered documents. SpanTran does not knowingly evaluate documents from
unaccredited institutions. SpanTran notifies appropriate entities of confirmed forgeries.
From 1982 to December 31, 2000, SpanTran retained files for 10 years from the date of file initiation. Since January 1, 2001,
SpanTran has been retaining files for five years from the date of file initiation. Questions regarding completed translations /
evaluations must be submitted in writing within 30 calendar days of issuance. Questions submitted after 30 calendar days must be
submitted in writing, accompanied by a non-refundable review fee of $50.00, which does not guarantee that any changes are justified.
Credential Evaluation Policies
SpanTran bases its evaluations on extensive in-house research and on information available to U.S. credential analysts in light of
prevailing placement guidelines and methodologies, as well as industry developments shared by member organizations of NACES®.
Since guidelines vary depending on the prevailing members and on changes in educational systems, credentials and methodologies,
individual recommendations may differ. Target / admitting institutions / entities in compliance with their internal policies and
procedures retain the absolute right to accept, modify, or reject the advisory recommendations expressed in our credential
evaluations. Furthermore, target / admitting institutions retain the right to require ‘challenge testing’ of all coursework, especially in
English and Mathematics.
Course analyses include equivalent U.S. credit hours. Whether the source degree plan is based on a yearly, semester, trimester or
quarter system, these are converted to semester credit hours. A semester credit hour requires a minimum of 15 contact hours of
theoretical instruction or 30 to 45 contact hours of laboratory / practical instruction. The norm in the United States is approximately
30 semester credit hours per academic year; foreign education requiring a heavier class load must be reduced accordingly. Thus,
subjects may be assigned a lower number or U.S. semester credit hours than the student expects to receive; some subjects may
receive only one or two credits and others may receive no credit at all. Evaluations state total recommended credit hours and may list
subjects for which no U.S. transfer credit is recommended; the latter are included in grade point calculations.
Course analyses provide course listings which follow transcript order without divisional recommendations. Divisional and nursing
course analyses provide course listings which follow transcript order with divisional recommendations. Engineering and Teaching
course analyses provide course listings which are grouped by category. For the last two categories, credits bear divisional
recommendations as follows: L= Lower division (first two years of undergraduate level study in content or U.S. equivalency
regardless of student standing), U = Upper division (third and higher years of undergraduate level study in content or U.S.
equivalency regardless of student standing), and G = Graduate (beyond the undergraduate level in content or U.S. equivalency
regardless of student standing).
Foreign grades are converted to U.S. letter grades based on the 4.00 system. Letter grade values are A = 4.00, A- = 3.67, B+ = 3.33,
B = 3.00, B- = 2.67, C+ = 2.33, C = 2.00, C- = 1.67, D+ = 1.33, D = 1.00, F = 0.00. A grade point average is a weighted average;
i.e., recommended credits per subject are multiplied times the 4.00-based grade per subject, arriving at quality points, and then total
quality points are divided by attempted credits. SpanTran lists the highest equivalent grade per subject, including failures and such
grades as credit, satisfactory, and pass. Failures are included in grade point calculations; such grades as credit, satisfactory, and pass
are excluded from grade point calculations. Because D grades, though passing, indicate a marginal achievement, target admitting
institutions retain the right to decline to recognize coursework with a D grade or to require 'challenge testing' of the same.
Electronic Evaluation Reports received directly from a SpanTran representative are deemed official. For questions concerning an
electronic copy of a SpanTran credentials evaluation, please email status@spantran.com.
SPANTRAN NO. : 140701 * Page 2 of 2

More Related Content

What's hot

UCL HEAR (Transcript)
UCL HEAR (Transcript)UCL HEAR (Transcript)
UCL HEAR (Transcript)Miguel Marin
 
MIS Transcript
MIS TranscriptMIS Transcript
MIS TranscriptKim Lewis
 
Ryan McGrady Transcripts SNHU 6MR7024651
Ryan McGrady Transcripts SNHU 6MR7024651Ryan McGrady Transcripts SNHU 6MR7024651
Ryan McGrady Transcripts SNHU 6MR7024651Ryan McGrady
 
Admissions To The U S Presentation
Admissions To The  U S PresentationAdmissions To The  U S Presentation
Admissions To The U S PresentationMarty Bennett
 
Unofficial transcript
Unofficial transcriptUnofficial transcript
Unofficial transcriptJason Walker
 
1653473917321-Eligibility and GTE.pptx
1653473917321-Eligibility and GTE.pptx1653473917321-Eligibility and GTE.pptx
1653473917321-Eligibility and GTE.pptxssuserc1d914
 
Trabajo sobre el Informe Médico Forense, temas 23, 24 y 25.
Trabajo sobre el Informe Médico Forense, temas 23, 24 y 25.Trabajo sobre el Informe Médico Forense, temas 23, 24 y 25.
Trabajo sobre el Informe Médico Forense, temas 23, 24 y 25.PaolaGordillo13
 
UCSD eTranscript
UCSD eTranscriptUCSD eTranscript
UCSD eTranscriptYi Rong
 
Management Diploma The Open University Berezhnova
Management Diploma The Open University BerezhnovaManagement Diploma The Open University Berezhnova
Management Diploma The Open University BerezhnovaLarissa Berezhnova
 
ND Official Transcript
ND Official TranscriptND Official Transcript
ND Official TranscriptAndi Noakes
 

What's hot (20)

UCL HEAR (Transcript)
UCL HEAR (Transcript)UCL HEAR (Transcript)
UCL HEAR (Transcript)
 
MIS Transcript
MIS TranscriptMIS Transcript
MIS Transcript
 
Ryan McGrady Transcripts SNHU 6MR7024651
Ryan McGrady Transcripts SNHU 6MR7024651Ryan McGrady Transcripts SNHU 6MR7024651
Ryan McGrady Transcripts SNHU 6MR7024651
 
Admissions To The U S Presentation
Admissions To The  U S PresentationAdmissions To The  U S Presentation
Admissions To The U S Presentation
 
Unofficial transcript
Unofficial transcriptUnofficial transcript
Unofficial transcript
 
Us higher education
Us higher educationUs higher education
Us higher education
 
Official Transcript
Official TranscriptOfficial Transcript
Official Transcript
 
5KK7815741
5KK78157415KK7815741
5KK7815741
 
1653473917321-Eligibility and GTE.pptx
1653473917321-Eligibility and GTE.pptx1653473917321-Eligibility and GTE.pptx
1653473917321-Eligibility and GTE.pptx
 
Trabajo sobre el Informe Médico Forense, temas 23, 24 y 25.
Trabajo sobre el Informe Médico Forense, temas 23, 24 y 25.Trabajo sobre el Informe Médico Forense, temas 23, 24 y 25.
Trabajo sobre el Informe Médico Forense, temas 23, 24 y 25.
 
Master's transcript
Master's transcriptMaster's transcript
Master's transcript
 
Official Transcripts
Official TranscriptsOfficial Transcripts
Official Transcripts
 
UCSD eTranscript
UCSD eTranscriptUCSD eTranscript
UCSD eTranscript
 
OFFICIAL-TRANSCRIPT_MCW
OFFICIAL-TRANSCRIPT_MCWOFFICIAL-TRANSCRIPT_MCW
OFFICIAL-TRANSCRIPT_MCW
 
College Transcript
College TranscriptCollege Transcript
College Transcript
 
Management Diploma The Open University Berezhnova
Management Diploma The Open University BerezhnovaManagement Diploma The Open University Berezhnova
Management Diploma The Open University Berezhnova
 
transcript
transcripttranscript
transcript
 
ND Official Transcript
ND Official TranscriptND Official Transcript
ND Official Transcript
 
Transcripts
TranscriptsTranscripts
Transcripts
 
Transcript.pdf(New)
Transcript.pdf(New)Transcript.pdf(New)
Transcript.pdf(New)
 

Similar to evaluation_140701

ElectronicTranscript
ElectronicTranscriptElectronicTranscript
ElectronicTranscriptYIRAN LIU
 
CISD Guidance for Seniors 2011 2012
CISD Guidance for Seniors 2011 2012CISD Guidance for Seniors 2011 2012
CISD Guidance for Seniors 2011 2012defibas
 
CISD GUIDANCE FOR SENIORS 2011
CISD GUIDANCE FOR SENIORS 2011CISD GUIDANCE FOR SENIORS 2011
CISD GUIDANCE FOR SENIORS 2011defibas
 
Senior guidance 2011
Senior guidance 2011Senior guidance 2011
Senior guidance 2011defibas
 
Carroll ISD Senior Guidance 2011 2012
Carroll ISD Senior Guidance 2011 2012Carroll ISD Senior Guidance 2011 2012
Carroll ISD Senior Guidance 2011 2012defibas
 
Inside law school admissions roboski fall 2010
Inside law school admissions roboski fall 2010Inside law school admissions roboski fall 2010
Inside law school admissions roboski fall 2010Charles Roboski
 
American Council on Education Transcript of Deepak (Danny) Singh
American Council on Education Transcript of Deepak (Danny) SinghAmerican Council on Education Transcript of Deepak (Danny) Singh
American Council on Education Transcript of Deepak (Danny) SinghDanny Singh, M.B.A., MSEd
 
Undergraduate Transcripts of Deepak (Danny) Singh
Undergraduate Transcripts of Deepak (Danny) SinghUndergraduate Transcripts of Deepak (Danny) Singh
Undergraduate Transcripts of Deepak (Danny) SinghDanny Singh, M.B.A., MSEd
 
Western New England University Graduate application
Western New England  University Graduate application Western New England  University Graduate application
Western New England University Graduate application Abhishek Bajaj
 
OTA STEPS Session - 2/18/2022
OTA STEPS Session - 2/18/2022OTA STEPS Session - 2/18/2022
OTA STEPS Session - 2/18/2022HGTCLibrary
 
Brad Kleindl - Degree to Enrollment Ratios and Persistence Rates, Meeting Rep...
Brad Kleindl - Degree to Enrollment Ratios and Persistence Rates, Meeting Rep...Brad Kleindl - Degree to Enrollment Ratios and Persistence Rates, Meeting Rep...
Brad Kleindl - Degree to Enrollment Ratios and Persistence Rates, Meeting Rep...ACBSP Global Accreditation
 
PRAB: R Vanderslice 10 24 08
PRAB:   R Vanderslice 10 24 08PRAB:   R Vanderslice 10 24 08
PRAB: R Vanderslice 10 24 08SE Lytle
 

Similar to evaluation_140701 (20)

evaluation_150007
evaluation_150007evaluation_150007
evaluation_150007
 
evaluation_134629
evaluation_134629evaluation_134629
evaluation_134629
 
KSTATE_Transcript_Fall 2014
KSTATE_Transcript_Fall 2014KSTATE_Transcript_Fall 2014
KSTATE_Transcript_Fall 2014
 
Brand Management
Brand ManagementBrand Management
Brand Management
 
ElectronicTranscript
ElectronicTranscriptElectronicTranscript
ElectronicTranscript
 
CISD Guidance for Seniors 2011 2012
CISD Guidance for Seniors 2011 2012CISD Guidance for Seniors 2011 2012
CISD Guidance for Seniors 2011 2012
 
CISD GUIDANCE FOR SENIORS 2011
CISD GUIDANCE FOR SENIORS 2011CISD GUIDANCE FOR SENIORS 2011
CISD GUIDANCE FOR SENIORS 2011
 
Senior guidance 2011
Senior guidance 2011Senior guidance 2011
Senior guidance 2011
 
Carroll ISD Senior Guidance 2011 2012
Carroll ISD Senior Guidance 2011 2012Carroll ISD Senior Guidance 2011 2012
Carroll ISD Senior Guidance 2011 2012
 
Inside law school admissions roboski fall 2010
Inside law school admissions roboski fall 2010Inside law school admissions roboski fall 2010
Inside law school admissions roboski fall 2010
 
University of California 101
University of California 101University of California 101
University of California 101
 
American Council on Education Transcript of Deepak (Danny) Singh
American Council on Education Transcript of Deepak (Danny) SinghAmerican Council on Education Transcript of Deepak (Danny) Singh
American Council on Education Transcript of Deepak (Danny) Singh
 
USC Transcript
USC TranscriptUSC Transcript
USC Transcript
 
Undergraduate Transcripts of Deepak (Danny) Singh
Undergraduate Transcripts of Deepak (Danny) SinghUndergraduate Transcripts of Deepak (Danny) Singh
Undergraduate Transcripts of Deepak (Danny) Singh
 
Western New England University Graduate application
Western New England  University Graduate application Western New England  University Graduate application
Western New England University Graduate application
 
OTA STEPS Session - 2/18/2022
OTA STEPS Session - 2/18/2022OTA STEPS Session - 2/18/2022
OTA STEPS Session - 2/18/2022
 
EVALUATION
EVALUATIONEVALUATION
EVALUATION
 
Brad Kleindl - Degree to Enrollment Ratios and Persistence Rates, Meeting Rep...
Brad Kleindl - Degree to Enrollment Ratios and Persistence Rates, Meeting Rep...Brad Kleindl - Degree to Enrollment Ratios and Persistence Rates, Meeting Rep...
Brad Kleindl - Degree to Enrollment Ratios and Persistence Rates, Meeting Rep...
 
PRAB: R Vanderslice 10 24 08
PRAB:   R Vanderslice 10 24 08PRAB:   R Vanderslice 10 24 08
PRAB: R Vanderslice 10 24 08
 
UTA Transcript
UTA TranscriptUTA Transcript
UTA Transcript
 

evaluation_140701

  • 1. MILLAN JIMENEZ, Julice 140701 MILLAN JIMENEZ, Julice General Analysis 06 April 2016 Name on Documentation: Date: SpanTran Number: Name on Application: Date of Birth: Type of Evaluation: 12/23/1986 # Prepared by: Ildiko Bors / Comments: AM Senior Credentials Evaluator Issuing Office - Houston, TX RECOMMENDED U.S. EDUCATIONAL EQUIVALENCY: Bachelor of Science in Petroleum Engineering from a regionally-accredited institution of higher education in the United States. Records pertaining to this file will be retained until 4/6/2021. Diploma, issued October 21, 2010, conferring Title of Petroleum Engineering (Título de Ingeniero de Petróleo) Received 5 years beyond 11 years of elementary-secondary education Cumana, Venezuela Universidad de Oriente Verification: CREDENTIAL I OF I Documentation: Length of Program: Institution: Location: Educational System: Suggested U.S. Equivalency: Bachelor of Science in Petroleum Engineering from a regionally-accredited institution of higher education in the United States. CREDENTIAL I DETAILS Institution Description: Foreign Credential: Título de Ingeniero de Petróleo, 2010 Undergraduate admission in Venezuela requires the título de bachiller / secondary school diploma which marks the completion of 11 to 12 years of school education. Técnico superior universitario / higher university technician programs, completed at intermediate post-secondary institutions, require 3 years / 6 semesters of full-time study. Licenciatura / licentiate and título / professional title programs, completed at university-level institutions, require 4 to 5 years (usually 5); human medicine requires 6 to 7 years. Graduate admission requires a título / licenciatura. Spanish is the principal language of instruction. Grade scales vary by institution. The University of the East, founded in 1958, is a bona fide public institution of tertiary education in Venezuela. The grade scale is based on 9 with 5 as minimum passing grade: 9 = 4.00/A, 7- 8 = 3.00/B, 5 - 6 = 2.00/C, below 5 = 0.00/F. An alternate grading scale is based on zero to ten, with five as the minimum passing grade, converted as: 10 = 4.00/A, 9 = 3.67 / A-, 8 = 3.33/B+, 7 = 3.00/B, 6 = 2.67/B-, and 5 = 2.00/C. This evaluation is advisory only. The recipient retains the right to accept, modify or reject the recommendations listed herein. v This file will be retained for five years from the date of file initiation. Inquiries about this evaluation must be submitted in writing within thirty days of the date listed at the top of page one of the evaluation. v SpanTran: The Evaluation Company is a member of the National Association of Credential Evaluation Services / NACES. v SPANTRAN NO. : 140701 * Page 1 of 2
  • 2. General Information and Policy Statements for Evaluation and Translation Services Located in Houston, Texas, New York, New York, and Miami, Florida (Intake Office), SpanTran: the Evaluation Company referred to herein as SpanTran, provides translations and credential(s) evaluations, SpanTran was incorporated in Texas in 1989. SpanTran employs A.T.A. certified translator(s). In 1996, SpanTran joined the National Association of Credential Evaluation Services / NACES® as a regular member. SpanTran does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, handicap, religion, sex, national origin, or age. Nevertheless, as a private company not supported by any governmental / public funds, SpanTran retains the right to decline to provide services. SpanTran is not responsible for the content, legibility, accuracy, and authenticity of translated documents. Nevertheless, SpanTran does not knowingly translate / evaluate falsified or altered documents. SpanTran does not knowingly evaluate documents from unaccredited institutions. SpanTran notifies appropriate entities of confirmed forgeries. From 1982 to December 31, 2000, SpanTran retained files for 10 years from the date of file initiation. Since January 1, 2001, SpanTran has been retaining files for five years from the date of file initiation. Questions regarding completed translations / evaluations must be submitted in writing within 30 calendar days of issuance. Questions submitted after 30 calendar days must be submitted in writing, accompanied by a non-refundable review fee of $50.00, which does not guarantee that any changes are justified. Credential Evaluation Policies SpanTran bases its evaluations on extensive in-house research and on information available to U.S. credential analysts in light of prevailing placement guidelines and methodologies, as well as industry developments shared by member organizations of NACES®. Since guidelines vary depending on the prevailing members and on changes in educational systems, credentials and methodologies, individual recommendations may differ. Target / admitting institutions / entities in compliance with their internal policies and procedures retain the absolute right to accept, modify, or reject the advisory recommendations expressed in our credential evaluations. Furthermore, target / admitting institutions retain the right to require ‘challenge testing’ of all coursework, especially in English and Mathematics. Course analyses include equivalent U.S. credit hours. Whether the source degree plan is based on a yearly, semester, trimester or quarter system, these are converted to semester credit hours. A semester credit hour requires a minimum of 15 contact hours of theoretical instruction or 30 to 45 contact hours of laboratory / practical instruction. The norm in the United States is approximately 30 semester credit hours per academic year; foreign education requiring a heavier class load must be reduced accordingly. Thus, subjects may be assigned a lower number or U.S. semester credit hours than the student expects to receive; some subjects may receive only one or two credits and others may receive no credit at all. Evaluations state total recommended credit hours and may list subjects for which no U.S. transfer credit is recommended; the latter are included in grade point calculations. Course analyses provide course listings which follow transcript order without divisional recommendations. Divisional and nursing course analyses provide course listings which follow transcript order with divisional recommendations. Engineering and Teaching course analyses provide course listings which are grouped by category. For the last two categories, credits bear divisional recommendations as follows: L= Lower division (first two years of undergraduate level study in content or U.S. equivalency regardless of student standing), U = Upper division (third and higher years of undergraduate level study in content or U.S. equivalency regardless of student standing), and G = Graduate (beyond the undergraduate level in content or U.S. equivalency regardless of student standing). Foreign grades are converted to U.S. letter grades based on the 4.00 system. Letter grade values are A = 4.00, A- = 3.67, B+ = 3.33, B = 3.00, B- = 2.67, C+ = 2.33, C = 2.00, C- = 1.67, D+ = 1.33, D = 1.00, F = 0.00. A grade point average is a weighted average; i.e., recommended credits per subject are multiplied times the 4.00-based grade per subject, arriving at quality points, and then total quality points are divided by attempted credits. SpanTran lists the highest equivalent grade per subject, including failures and such grades as credit, satisfactory, and pass. Failures are included in grade point calculations; such grades as credit, satisfactory, and pass are excluded from grade point calculations. Because D grades, though passing, indicate a marginal achievement, target admitting institutions retain the right to decline to recognize coursework with a D grade or to require 'challenge testing' of the same. Electronic Evaluation Reports received directly from a SpanTran representative are deemed official. For questions concerning an electronic copy of a SpanTran credentials evaluation, please email status@spantran.com. SPANTRAN NO. : 140701 * Page 2 of 2