SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 9
1. Aims and Objectives
IN STRICTEST CONFIDENCE
1
Compliance Simplified
3
Compliance
Assurance :
Asset Data
Standards
Process
Mgmt. Persons
Design Guides :
influence initial
compliance and
at refurbishment
Audit:
Quantitive Perf
Tech Qualitative
Mgmt. Groups
Duties
Understood
: Legislative
Reqs
Arrangements :
Contracts –
compliance
Performance Reqs
Resource
Database
Reporting
General H+S
reqs
Specific
Legislation
Business
Mandatory
Reqs
Business
Interpreted
Stds
Overall
Standards
Compliance
Handbook
TFM Contract
Specialists
Contracts
General
Performance
KPI
Quantitive
Qualitative
Audits
Software/
Database
Process
Handbook
Audit
Handbook
Capital/ LCR
delivered
Compliance
Management
Actions
Reporting
Menu
Management
and Board
Reports
New/Refurb
Design
Guidance
Management
Arrangements
The Compliance Approach
5
Compliance
Reports
Legal
Framework
Applicability
test to Business
Policy,
Standards,
Guidance
Supply Chain
Procured
Test and
Certification
Compliance
Database
Industry Stds
Current/Future
Operating
Conditions
Bus. Standards
Draft defined
Suite of P+S,
Guidance
Comprehensive
Design Guides
TFM
Contract
Specialist
Suppliers
Assets and
Frequency
maintained
Performance
and
Certification
Risk Based
Management
Dynamic
Supplier Mgmt.
Programme
KPI Mgmt.
Procurement and Process
Gaps reviewed and
closed
Structure, Database and
Audit Function Recommendations
as part of Compliance Review
Feedback
Loop
Process Review
and refinement as
function of
Compliance Forum
KEY - Activity Supporting Process
Key Process Step
Key Decision
Legislation and
ACOP Review
Board Reports
Assurance
Statement
BRE Exercise
Overall Review by Business –
Determination of
Operating Suite
Audit Function
Data/ System
Audits
Technical
Audit
Compliance
Forum
Independent
Compliance
Review
Compliance
Summaries
Compliance
Process
The Standards and Guidance Delivery Approach
6
Menu of reqd
P+S
Data Gather
P+S,
Guidance
developed
Stakeholder
Approval
Publication Training
Industry Stds
Current/Future
Operating
Conditions
Bus. Existing
Standards
Draft defined
Suite of P+S,
Guidance
Comprehensive
Design Guides
Impact
Statement
Responsibility
Matrix
Ownership/
Version and
Date controls
Database and
Protection
Guides and
Templates
Process
Mapping
KEY - Activity Supporting Process
Key Process Step
Legislation and
ACOP Review
BRE Exercise
Review
In use
Review
Change and
Date Triggers
Bus. Reqd
Operating
Standards
Guiding
Principles
Legislative /
Process
Updates
Business SME
Engaged
Supply Chain
Engaged
FireElectricalMechanical EnvironmentalBuilding
1. Earthing Systems
2. Electrical Installation
Inspection
3. Emergency Lights High
Voltage Installations
4. Lightning Protection
Systems
5. PCB’s – (old
switchgear)
6. Portable Appliance
Testing
1. Aircon – F Gas
2. Biomass Boilers
3. Cooling Towers
4. Dock Levellers
5. Gas Installation + Appliances
6. Legionella and Water
Hygiene
7. LEV Systems
8. Lifting Equipment (scissor
lifts, lifting beams etc)
9. Lifts
10. LPG – Fixed Systems
11. Microwave Ovens
12. Power operated shutter,
sectional and rapid roll doors
13. Pressure Systems and
Vessels
14. Traffic Barriers, Gates,
Hydraulic Ramps
1. Access Equipment- Fall
arrest etc
2. Asbestos Management
3. Eye Bolts
4. Fixed Ladders and
Gantries
5. Glazing Safety
6. Radiation Safety –
naturally occurring
radiation
7. Window Cradles
1. Control of Substances
Hazardous to Health (COSHH)
Regs 2002
2. Display Energy Certificate
3. Discharge Consents
4. Fuel Facilities and Adblue
5. Grease Traps and Dosing
Systems
6. Hazardous Waste
7. Invasive Weeds (principally
Japanese Knotweed)
8. Oil Interceptors
9. Oil Storage (>200 litres)
10. Oil Storage (Drums < 200l,
Intermediate bulk containers
<1000l)
11. Vehicle Washing and Cleaning
1. ASD Systems (very
early smoke detection)
2. Fire Dampers
3. Fire Detection and
Alarm Systems
4. Fire Doors
5. Fire Fighting
Equipment
6. Fire Risk Assessment
7. Gas Extinguishing
Systems
8. Hydrants and Fire
Risers
9. Pocket Vibrating Fire
Warning Systems
10. Refuge Areas and
Evac. Chairs
11. Smoke Control
Systems and Vents
12. Sprinkler Systems
L1 -High Risk , High
Impact – eg : Asbestos
,Legionella, Lifts,
Electrical
L2 – Medium Risk, eg :
gas , equipment,
L3 - Lower Risk , eg
glazing safety, radiation
safety
 Why ? – certain assets and
activities warrant additional audit
– risk, severity, likelihood and
complexity of delivery determine
the targets.
 Who ? – balance of internal and
external resource structured
through eg HV Mgmt. Team,
Compliance Forum,
 What ? – quantitive, qualitative,
methodology, training (int. and
ext.) recording, reporting ,
benchmark compliance.
Compliance Deep Audit
Volatile, subject to multiple
influences, based on 3rd party
assessed risk, complex layered
delivery with high risk of supply chain
failure – DEEP AUDIT NEEDED
Less complex delivery requirements,
more fully defined, less risk based
and less likelihood of process failure
by supply chain – STD Quantitive/
Qualitative Audit suffices?
Proposed Graduated Approach
Typically routine delivery
requirements , generic delivery
through supply chain/ PiC, low
likelihood of process failure. - – STD
Quantitive/ Qualitative Audit
suffices less frequently.
Heading Asset Element Severity Likelihood Complexity
Score/
Indicator L1 L2 L3
Electrical Earthing Systems 5 3 1 9 y
Electrical Electrical Installation Inspection 5 3 4 12 y
Electrical Emergency Lights 2 2 1 5 y
Electrical High Voltage Installations 5 3 5 13 y
Electrical Lightning Protection 5 1 1 7 y
Electrical PCB Old Switchgear 2 1 1 4 y
Electrical Portable Appliance Testing 2 1 1 4 y
Mechanical Aircon - F Gas 1 2 1 4 y
Mechanical Biomass Boilers 2 1 1 4 y
Mechanical Cooling Towers 5 4 5 14 y
Mechanical Dock Levellers 2 1 1 4 y
Audit LevelAudit Level Scoring
Audit Level Scoring

More Related Content

Similar to Compliance Legal Framework Review snapshot

Hsse policy group 5 final
Hsse policy group 5 finalHsse policy group 5 final
Hsse policy group 5 finalSamarth Mewada
 
How to Drive Value from Operational Risk Data - Part 2
How to Drive Value from Operational Risk Data - Part 2How to Drive Value from Operational Risk Data - Part 2
How to Drive Value from Operational Risk Data - Part 2Perficient, Inc.
 
Validation Services
Validation ServicesValidation Services
Validation ServicesRS Serve
 
Audit in Pharmacovigilance
Audit in PharmacovigilanceAudit in Pharmacovigilance
Audit in Pharmacovigilanceclarityeye
 
Operational Excellence in Oil and Gas Loss Prevention
Operational Excellence in Oil and Gas Loss PreventionOperational Excellence in Oil and Gas Loss Prevention
Operational Excellence in Oil and Gas Loss PreventionMichael Marshall, PE
 
2016-06-08 FDA Inspection Readiness - Mikael Yde
2016-06-08 FDA Inspection Readiness - Mikael Yde2016-06-08 FDA Inspection Readiness - Mikael Yde
2016-06-08 FDA Inspection Readiness - Mikael Ydemikaelyde
 
Lean Thinking Inside and Outside a Software Engineering Company (Dave Jackson)
Lean Thinking Inside and Outside a Software Engineering Company (Dave Jackson)Lean Thinking Inside and Outside a Software Engineering Company (Dave Jackson)
Lean Thinking Inside and Outside a Software Engineering Company (Dave Jackson)AdaCore
 
Introduction to The Augustus Group and RBI
Introduction to The Augustus Group and RBIIntroduction to The Augustus Group and RBI
Introduction to The Augustus Group and RBIEdwin A Merrick
 
Ofqual Audit Approach: April 2015
Ofqual Audit Approach: April 2015Ofqual Audit Approach: April 2015
Ofqual Audit Approach: April 2015Ofqual Slideshare
 
APM Best Practices - Reliability Added Value
APM Best Practices - Reliability Added ValueAPM Best Practices - Reliability Added Value
APM Best Practices - Reliability Added ValueStork
 
Creating a compliance assessment program on a tight budget
Creating a compliance assessment program on a tight budgetCreating a compliance assessment program on a tight budget
Creating a compliance assessment program on a tight budgetAshley Deuble
 
Introducing mark lynch
Introducing mark lynchIntroducing mark lynch
Introducing mark lynchmelynch
 
Paul Howland - DSTL - SPF EM risk framework presentation v2
Paul Howland - DSTL - SPF EM risk framework presentation v2Paul Howland - DSTL - SPF EM risk framework presentation v2
Paul Howland - DSTL - SPF EM risk framework presentation v2techUK
 
supply chain management.docxnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
supply chain management.docxnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnsupply chain management.docxnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
supply chain management.docxnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnMinaMikhael14
 
Recipe for successful Supply Chain Risk Management
Recipe for successful Supply Chain Risk ManagementRecipe for successful Supply Chain Risk Management
Recipe for successful Supply Chain Risk ManagementHeiko Schwarz
 
Managing Today’s Supply Chain
Managing Today’s Supply ChainManaging Today’s Supply Chain
Managing Today’s Supply Chainmubarak2009
 

Similar to Compliance Legal Framework Review snapshot (20)

Hsse policy group 5 final
Hsse policy group 5 finalHsse policy group 5 final
Hsse policy group 5 final
 
How to Drive Value from Operational Risk Data - Part 2
How to Drive Value from Operational Risk Data - Part 2How to Drive Value from Operational Risk Data - Part 2
How to Drive Value from Operational Risk Data - Part 2
 
Validation Services
Validation ServicesValidation Services
Validation Services
 
Audit in Pharmacovigilance
Audit in PharmacovigilanceAudit in Pharmacovigilance
Audit in Pharmacovigilance
 
Operational Excellence in Oil and Gas Loss Prevention
Operational Excellence in Oil and Gas Loss PreventionOperational Excellence in Oil and Gas Loss Prevention
Operational Excellence in Oil and Gas Loss Prevention
 
2016-06-08 FDA Inspection Readiness - Mikael Yde
2016-06-08 FDA Inspection Readiness - Mikael Yde2016-06-08 FDA Inspection Readiness - Mikael Yde
2016-06-08 FDA Inspection Readiness - Mikael Yde
 
Lean Thinking Inside and Outside a Software Engineering Company (Dave Jackson)
Lean Thinking Inside and Outside a Software Engineering Company (Dave Jackson)Lean Thinking Inside and Outside a Software Engineering Company (Dave Jackson)
Lean Thinking Inside and Outside a Software Engineering Company (Dave Jackson)
 
Introduction to The Augustus Group and RBI
Introduction to The Augustus Group and RBIIntroduction to The Augustus Group and RBI
Introduction to The Augustus Group and RBI
 
CRO - Clinical Vendor Oversight Webinar.
CRO - Clinical Vendor Oversight Webinar.CRO - Clinical Vendor Oversight Webinar.
CRO - Clinical Vendor Oversight Webinar.
 
Ofqual Audit Approach: April 2015
Ofqual Audit Approach: April 2015Ofqual Audit Approach: April 2015
Ofqual Audit Approach: April 2015
 
APM Best Practices - Reliability Added Value
APM Best Practices - Reliability Added ValueAPM Best Practices - Reliability Added Value
APM Best Practices - Reliability Added Value
 
Creating a compliance assessment program on a tight budget
Creating a compliance assessment program on a tight budgetCreating a compliance assessment program on a tight budget
Creating a compliance assessment program on a tight budget
 
David Whitaker: Managing Your Vendors
David Whitaker: Managing Your VendorsDavid Whitaker: Managing Your Vendors
David Whitaker: Managing Your Vendors
 
Introducing mark lynch
Introducing mark lynchIntroducing mark lynch
Introducing mark lynch
 
Paul Howland - DSTL - SPF EM risk framework presentation v2
Paul Howland - DSTL - SPF EM risk framework presentation v2Paul Howland - DSTL - SPF EM risk framework presentation v2
Paul Howland - DSTL - SPF EM risk framework presentation v2
 
Security audit
Security auditSecurity audit
Security audit
 
supply chain management.docxnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
supply chain management.docxnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnsupply chain management.docxnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
supply chain management.docxnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
 
Recipe for successful Supply Chain Risk Management
Recipe for successful Supply Chain Risk ManagementRecipe for successful Supply Chain Risk Management
Recipe for successful Supply Chain Risk Management
 
UNIT 9 ASSIGNMENT
UNIT 9 ASSIGNMENTUNIT 9 ASSIGNMENT
UNIT 9 ASSIGNMENT
 
Managing Today’s Supply Chain
Managing Today’s Supply ChainManaging Today’s Supply Chain
Managing Today’s Supply Chain
 

Compliance Legal Framework Review snapshot

  • 1. 1. Aims and Objectives IN STRICTEST CONFIDENCE 1
  • 2.
  • 3. Compliance Simplified 3 Compliance Assurance : Asset Data Standards Process Mgmt. Persons Design Guides : influence initial compliance and at refurbishment Audit: Quantitive Perf Tech Qualitative Mgmt. Groups Duties Understood : Legislative Reqs Arrangements : Contracts – compliance Performance Reqs Resource Database Reporting
  • 5. The Compliance Approach 5 Compliance Reports Legal Framework Applicability test to Business Policy, Standards, Guidance Supply Chain Procured Test and Certification Compliance Database Industry Stds Current/Future Operating Conditions Bus. Standards Draft defined Suite of P+S, Guidance Comprehensive Design Guides TFM Contract Specialist Suppliers Assets and Frequency maintained Performance and Certification Risk Based Management Dynamic Supplier Mgmt. Programme KPI Mgmt. Procurement and Process Gaps reviewed and closed Structure, Database and Audit Function Recommendations as part of Compliance Review Feedback Loop Process Review and refinement as function of Compliance Forum KEY - Activity Supporting Process Key Process Step Key Decision Legislation and ACOP Review Board Reports Assurance Statement BRE Exercise Overall Review by Business – Determination of Operating Suite Audit Function Data/ System Audits Technical Audit Compliance Forum Independent Compliance Review Compliance Summaries Compliance Process
  • 6. The Standards and Guidance Delivery Approach 6 Menu of reqd P+S Data Gather P+S, Guidance developed Stakeholder Approval Publication Training Industry Stds Current/Future Operating Conditions Bus. Existing Standards Draft defined Suite of P+S, Guidance Comprehensive Design Guides Impact Statement Responsibility Matrix Ownership/ Version and Date controls Database and Protection Guides and Templates Process Mapping KEY - Activity Supporting Process Key Process Step Legislation and ACOP Review BRE Exercise Review In use Review Change and Date Triggers Bus. Reqd Operating Standards Guiding Principles Legislative / Process Updates Business SME Engaged Supply Chain Engaged
  • 7. FireElectricalMechanical EnvironmentalBuilding 1. Earthing Systems 2. Electrical Installation Inspection 3. Emergency Lights High Voltage Installations 4. Lightning Protection Systems 5. PCB’s – (old switchgear) 6. Portable Appliance Testing 1. Aircon – F Gas 2. Biomass Boilers 3. Cooling Towers 4. Dock Levellers 5. Gas Installation + Appliances 6. Legionella and Water Hygiene 7. LEV Systems 8. Lifting Equipment (scissor lifts, lifting beams etc) 9. Lifts 10. LPG – Fixed Systems 11. Microwave Ovens 12. Power operated shutter, sectional and rapid roll doors 13. Pressure Systems and Vessels 14. Traffic Barriers, Gates, Hydraulic Ramps 1. Access Equipment- Fall arrest etc 2. Asbestos Management 3. Eye Bolts 4. Fixed Ladders and Gantries 5. Glazing Safety 6. Radiation Safety – naturally occurring radiation 7. Window Cradles 1. Control of Substances Hazardous to Health (COSHH) Regs 2002 2. Display Energy Certificate 3. Discharge Consents 4. Fuel Facilities and Adblue 5. Grease Traps and Dosing Systems 6. Hazardous Waste 7. Invasive Weeds (principally Japanese Knotweed) 8. Oil Interceptors 9. Oil Storage (>200 litres) 10. Oil Storage (Drums < 200l, Intermediate bulk containers <1000l) 11. Vehicle Washing and Cleaning 1. ASD Systems (very early smoke detection) 2. Fire Dampers 3. Fire Detection and Alarm Systems 4. Fire Doors 5. Fire Fighting Equipment 6. Fire Risk Assessment 7. Gas Extinguishing Systems 8. Hydrants and Fire Risers 9. Pocket Vibrating Fire Warning Systems 10. Refuge Areas and Evac. Chairs 11. Smoke Control Systems and Vents 12. Sprinkler Systems
  • 8. L1 -High Risk , High Impact – eg : Asbestos ,Legionella, Lifts, Electrical L2 – Medium Risk, eg : gas , equipment, L3 - Lower Risk , eg glazing safety, radiation safety  Why ? – certain assets and activities warrant additional audit – risk, severity, likelihood and complexity of delivery determine the targets.  Who ? – balance of internal and external resource structured through eg HV Mgmt. Team, Compliance Forum,  What ? – quantitive, qualitative, methodology, training (int. and ext.) recording, reporting , benchmark compliance. Compliance Deep Audit Volatile, subject to multiple influences, based on 3rd party assessed risk, complex layered delivery with high risk of supply chain failure – DEEP AUDIT NEEDED Less complex delivery requirements, more fully defined, less risk based and less likelihood of process failure by supply chain – STD Quantitive/ Qualitative Audit suffices? Proposed Graduated Approach Typically routine delivery requirements , generic delivery through supply chain/ PiC, low likelihood of process failure. - – STD Quantitive/ Qualitative Audit suffices less frequently.
  • 9. Heading Asset Element Severity Likelihood Complexity Score/ Indicator L1 L2 L3 Electrical Earthing Systems 5 3 1 9 y Electrical Electrical Installation Inspection 5 3 4 12 y Electrical Emergency Lights 2 2 1 5 y Electrical High Voltage Installations 5 3 5 13 y Electrical Lightning Protection 5 1 1 7 y Electrical PCB Old Switchgear 2 1 1 4 y Electrical Portable Appliance Testing 2 1 1 4 y Mechanical Aircon - F Gas 1 2 1 4 y Mechanical Biomass Boilers 2 1 1 4 y Mechanical Cooling Towers 5 4 5 14 y Mechanical Dock Levellers 2 1 1 4 y Audit LevelAudit Level Scoring Audit Level Scoring