Healing process involved in anterior cruciate ligament injury and surgery/ reconstruction (majority based on animal studies - integrates human research when possible).
2. Overview
Native ACL rupture - reasons for reconstruction
Post-operative healing:
1) Intra-articular remodelling:
a) Early phase
b) Proliferation
- Recellularisation
- Revascularisation
c) Maturation/ Ligamentisation
2) Intra-tunnel incorporation
3. Why does the native ACL not heal?
Inactive plasminogen
Urokinase plasminogen
activator (uPa)
Plasmin
Poor vascularisation
Intra-articular joint
Healthy
Fibrinolysis
Fibrinogen
Natural, biological, fibrin-platelet
scaffold (clot) cannot be formed
Murray et al. (2000)
Perrone et al.(2017)
Smith & Noyes (2019)
4. Why does the native ACL not heal?
No contact between “stumps”
Poor vascularisation
Murray et al. (2000)
Smith & Noyes (2019)
Intra-articular joint
Retraction of the ligament remnant
7. Early phase (Week 1-4)
Avascularisation (relative hypoxia)
Partial Necrosis (*central)? (<30%)
Inflammatory & fibroblastic responses:
cytokines and growth factors (e.g. vascular
endothelial growth factor)
Initiates cascade of healing
Johnson (1993); Amiel et al. (1986); Claes et al. (2011); Smith & Noyes (2019)
8. Proliferation (Week 4-12) (up to 10 months)
Re-cellularisation
↑ fibroblastic density (*myofibroblasts)
Mixed diameter fibrils to smaller diameter
Increase in type III collagen/ fibronectin
Become disorganised and lose crimp
pattern
↑ collagen density
Johnson (1993); Amiel et al. (1986); Grant & Mohtadi (2003); Scheffler et al. (2008); Claes et al. (2011); Smith & Noyes (2019)
9.
10. Re-vascularisation
12 weeks post-op: >native ACL vascular density
Hypothesised: angiogenesis enables maximal cellular activity??
From Early Phase ↑ expression of VEGF
Neovascularisation
Hoffa fat pad & synovium?
External
factors
–
smoking,
drugs,
diabetes
Johnson (1993); Amiel et al. (1986); Grant & Mohtadi (2003); Scheffler et al. (2008); Claes et al. (2011); Smith & Noyes (2019);
Proliferation (Week 4-12) (up to 10 months)
12. Ligamentisation/ Maturation (week 12 +) (Up to 3 years)
Graft cells to native-like cells:
1) ↑ glycoaminoglycans? (*myofibroblasts)
2) Collagen bundles attain a densely packed, parallel alignment
3) Crimp pattern re-develops
4) Collagen cross-linking progresses
@ 2 years post: collagen content and density resembles but not same as native ACL (smaller
diameter)
Hydroxypyridium cross-link density (Ng et al. 1996):
- Good correlation on regression analyses with Young’s Modulus
- Comparable effects of increase of HP within ACL
Johnson (1993); Ng et al. 1996; Amiel et al. (1986); Grant & Mohtadi (2003); Scheffler et al. (2008); Claes et al. (2011); Smith & Noyes (2019);
13.
14. No real consensus on actual phase
durations and limited human studies
- Claes et al. (2011)
15. N = 67
Mid-
substance
biopsies
Group 1 (6-12 months)
Group 2 (13-24 months)
Group 3 (>24 months)
Myofibroblast density: ↑ Group 2
Collagen orientation: irregular in Group 1; “more regular” in 2 & 3
Group 1: ovoid; Group 2: spindle; Group 3:~narrow and long
↑ cellular & vascular density up to 24 months post-op
Collagen orientation: not “native” by 117 months
Hamstring remodelling: 12-24 months (Pauzenberger et al. 2013)
17. Incorporation
• Systematic review (Lu et al. 2018) – not regenerated after aclr
• 3 months (3-4 weeks): fibrovascular interface formed between
tendon and bone
• 6 months: fibrous interface throughout bone tunnel
• 6-12 months: showed indirect insertion via Sharpey-like fibres
intact native ACL – 4 distinct zones (Evans et al. 1990):
1) Ligament
2) Unmineralized fibrocartilage
3) Mineralisezed fibrocartilage
4) Bone
Dissipation of forces
Most findings from animal studies due to the
invasive nature of biopsies – limited on humans and
far from understood (Lu et al. 2018)
21. Jackson et al. (1993); Ng et al. (1995); Janssen & Scheffler (2013); Smith & Noyes (2019)
Strongest: Wk 1
Graft Failure:
< Week 4: graft pull-out
> Week 4: intra-articular
(6-8 weeks post-op*)
Full restoration of
mechanical strength to
intact ACL not observed
in vivo: type III collagen?
Most rehabilitative
programmes are formed
from animal progression
22. Graft loading:
- Initial partial loading:
maintain graft integrity;
prevent stretching, laxity and
future instability; optimise
ingrowth and subsequent
maturation of cellular and
extracellular components
Scheffler et al (2008); Smith & Noyes (201
No consensus on what optimal loading looks like throughout rehab –
biological healing takes time
23. Summary
A LOT OF DEBATE & HETEROGENEITY
Hypoxia/Necrosis cell migration, proliferation, ECM synthesis, revascularisation
Limited capacity for
human in vivo
studies
Current RTS –
modelled off animal
biology?
“Complete” healing: may take up to 3 years!!!
Assisted by progressive loading
GENERAL OVERVIEW – NOT REALLY SPECIFIC TO GRAFT TYPE EXCEPT IN INTRA-TUNNEL INCORPORTATION
Injury to extra-articular ligaments, such as the MCL, lead to bleeding from surrounding tissues that delivers fibrinogen. This fibrinogen is cleaved by thrombin to fibrin – allowing for the formation of platelet-fibrin clot as these can coagulate. This clots acts as a scaffold for platelets, WBC, RBCs etc – which then allows a space for surrounding tissues to grow and connect. But in intra-articular ligaments, this cant happen. Synovial fluid surrounding the joint contacts plasminogen which is inactive in the healthy knee. When injured, a protease enzyme known as urokinase plasminogen activator is upregulated by synviocytes and this converts plasminogen to plasmin. Any fibrinogen in any bleeding is acted upon by plasmin by fibrinolysis which means that a natural and biological scaffold for ligament healing cannot occur.
Movement of the knee and they position of the acl stumps left after rupture means that no consistent contact occurs to act as a structure to heal.
A synovial tissue layer also forms around each stump end, encasing it and thickening and eventually contracting to restrict stump-to-stump healing.
a) Disruption of the epiligament and synovial covering of the ligament (b) intimal hyperplasia of the vessels (c), and loss of the regular crimp structure near the site of injury (d).
B: The epiligamentous regeneration phase, involving a gradual recovering of the ligament remnant by vascularized, epiligamentous tissue
and synovial tissue (e).
C: The proliferative phase, with revascularization of the remnant with groups of capillaries (f).
D: The remodeling and maturation phase, characterized by a decrease in cell number density and blood vessel density (g) and by retraction of the ligament remanent
- Partial / complete necrosis : complete in animals i.e. sheep
A cascade of events here sets up for the latter phases as the cytokines and growth factors promote cell migration, proliferation, extracellular matrix synthesis (ie. Collagen), and the eventual revascularisation.
Animal versus human – necrotic magnitude (3 and 6 weeks post-op), retained tissue from graft source, remodelling speed, degree of neovascularisation (dependent on necrosis?), quality of replacement tissue
Within this stage there are no significant changes to collagen composition/ structure – retain
Phenotype of the synovial fibroblasts that recolonize the graft likely differ from those of the native ACL – accounting for differences in ultra-structure and mechanical quality
Cellular activity has slowed to native ACL levels – protein synthesis and growth factor release slow to native levels
The higher the youngs modulus – the stiffer the material is stiffness is the resistance to stretch -> goats
Sanchez – hamstring, falconiero mixed (*BPTB), abe BPTB, rougraff - BPTB
No consensus – but gives indication of biological processes and timlines for return – where the biopsy is taken from, procedures used to determine remodelling status – optical microscrope versus electron microscope, thresholds utilised.
Why its hard to draw on research for humans – animals: faster and more necrosis of which magnitude of neovascularisation is associated with – alongside differing weight-bearing, slight variations in surgical techniques, and mechanics – bipedal vs quadrupedal
Biopsies from native HT (n = 17) and ACL (n = 8) served as controls. Strong increase in group 2 myofibroblast content, from 13 -24 months, indicated an activie remodelling process from 1 to 2 years. &
Longer recovery – non-anatomic ACLR that used trans-tibial surgical techniques &
No necrosis – too late
Used factor VIII staining tehcniques tht can improve vessel detection possibility and special immunohistochemical staining techniques for mofibroblast density = not used by Sanchez.
Sharpey’s-like fibres @ 12weeks for
Tendon Healing in Bone Tunnel after Human Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Histological Results (Lu et al. 2018)
Sharkey-like collagen fibres that connect the tendon graft to the bone has been described as is viewed as the earlier sign of osteointegration (Lui et al. 1997).
28) Evans et al 1990 - Fibrocartilage in the attachment
zones of the quadriceps tendon and patellar ligament of
man.
Rossetti et al 2017 - The microstructure and micromechanics of the tendon-bone insertion.
In 1905, Wilhem Roux stated the law of tissue adaptation (developmental mechancis as he labelled it) to which a tissue can adapt its structure to be better suited to an meet the demands of an alterative circumstance, possibly within the environment. With self-determinantion, the inherit structural and functional development of a specific organ or tissue is preprogrammed. Dependent differation, on the other hand, attempts to exmaplin how external stimuli can drive purposeful and biological adaptions to tissues to allow for improve function. As a graft integrates into its host, its intraarticular component experiences functional adaptions and reorgainziation of its internal structure to closely resemble a native acl. ( 1min 14)
Strongest: Wk 1
Weakest: ~Wk 6-8 – revascularisation, cellular infiltration, loss of regular collagen oritentation and crimp pattern and the phases of collagen characteristisc (density, magnitude, size changes)
Tendon healing in bone tunnel is influed by mechanical stress – it has been shown that the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells is directly influend by pressure and tenson.
Maximum cellular activity and remodelling (weeks 4 -10) - mechanical weakening graft (much weaker than native)
Increase in type III collagen – mechanical strength of graft is not restored to native acl strength even after 2 – type III has lower mechanical strength
maximum cellular activity and remodelling (weeks 4 -10) - mechanical weakening graft (much weaker than native) – Lowest mechanical strength at 6-8 weeks post-op
Slow regain of strength – at 12 months mechanical strength is 50-60% of intact acl
Graft loading: some authors suggest early loading should be avoid but tensile strength of patellar and HT ACLR decrease in stress-deprived as opposed to partially loaded early loading relies of stability of fixation of graft as adequate healing into tunnels hasn’t happened & too much loading can be deleterious for biological ingrowth and stability for required for healing
The strength of all the available grafts is superior to that of the native ACL. All these tests were performed on the unimplanted graft, and therefore the subsequent weakening that takes place in the graft after implantation and during healing should be taken into consideration (From Zen et al. 2017 - Autogenous Hamstring-Bone Graft Preparation for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction)
Strongest: Wk 1
Weakest: ~Wk 6-8 – revascularisation, cellular infiltration, loss of regular collagen oritentation and crimp pattern and the phases of collagen characteristisc (density, magnitude, size changes)
Tendon healing in bone tunnel is influed by mechanical stress – it has been shown that the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells is directly influend by pressure and tenson.
Maximum cellular activity and remodelling (weeks 4 -10) - mechanical weakening graft (much weaker than native)
Increase in type III collagen – mechanical strength of graft is not restored to native acl strength even after 2 – type III has lower mechanical strength
maximum cellular activity and remodelling (weeks 4 -10) - mechanical weakening graft (much weaker than native) – Lowest mechanical strength at 6-8 weeks post-op
Slow regain of strength – at 12 months mechanical strength is 50-60% of intact acl
Graft loading: some authors suggest early loading should be avoid but tensile strength of patellar and HT ACLR decrease in stress-deprived as opposed to partially loaded early loading relies of stability of fixation of graft as adequate healing into tunnels hasn’t happened & too much loading can be deleterious for biological ingrowth and stability for required for healing
Scheffler et al. 2008 - Graft remodelling and ligamentization after cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Human – periphery, sensitivity of staining techniques, rehabilitative programmes, surgical techniques, second-look or post mortem, endo-button or interference screws (tunnel widening)