SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
Download to read offline
Results
From the audio recordings, we found the root mean squared (RMS)
amplitude, a relative measure of loudness not dependent on the
human hearing range, of each audio file using Sox
(sox.sourceforge.net). The mean RMS amplitude of ToT nights (M
= 0.0239, SE 0.001) was significantly greater, and thus louder,
than baseline nights (M = 0.0154, SE 0.003), t(4) = -2.74, p =
0.026.
At night, the monkeys had access to both their exhibit yard and a
night-house. If the animals were inside, they were out of view of
the researchers. When controlling for visibility, there was no
significant difference between the percentages of scans the
monkeys were active when comparing baseline and ToT
(Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = 0.983). However, the monkeys
were inside during 40.8% of scans in the baseline condition and
only 0.5% of scans during ToT (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, one-
tailed p = 0.034, Figure 2). Thus, the monkeys were outside far
more often during ToT.
Given the large difference in where the monkeys spent time (inside
or outside) during ToT, we also analyzed the data without
controlling for visibility. In these analyses, we retain the data
points where the monkeys were not visible. Thus, we compared
the proportion of scans in which we know the monkeys were
active to the total number of scans, rather than only the scans in
which the animals were visible. The proportion of scans in which
the animals were active was significantly higher during ToT
observations compared to baseline (Dependent Proportions Test,
Z = 3.9, p < 0.001, Figure 2). This indicates that activity levels, or
at least outside activity levels, were much higher during the ToT
event, suggesting the event interrupted their typical resting
pattern.
Florida Institute of Technology – 2016
The effect of a nighttime zoo event on spider
monkey (Ateles geoffroyi) behavior
D. Proctor, H. Gedde, B. Baldrica, E. Burch, J. Kramer, J. Swanson and C. Vergason
Florida Institute of Technology
Introduction
The relationship between zoo visitors and animals, particularly
primates, is a complicated one and there is little consensus in the
literature on whether visitors cause stress, provide enrichment or do
not affect the animals (Hosey, 2000), although this varies by species.
For example, spider monkeys have higher urinary cortisol levels
when more visitors are present (Davis, Schaffner, & Smith, 2005).
Yet, there are also reports of other primates seeking visitor
interactions (Vrancken, Van Elsacker, & Verheyen, 1990). To gain
more information about this relationship and to ensure animal
wellness, it is important to monitor animal behavior in zoos when
adding new visitor experiences.
This is particularly true in regards to late-night zoo events, as there
has been little research on how events outside of the typical
operating hours affect animal behavior. In October, 2015, Brevard
Zoo in Melbourne, FL, USA added a new late-night (8-12 pm),
Halloween-themed visitor experience. The “Trail of Terror” (ToT;
runforyourfreakinlife.com) was a haunted house style event where
visitors walk through the woods surrounding the zoo and actors
startled them at certain locations on the trail. One such startle point
was located approximately 20 yards from the spider monkey exhibit.
To determine what effect, if any, this event had on the behavior of
these diurnal monkeys, we monitored their behavior during the event
and on baseline nights with no visitors present.
Methods
We observed the spider monkeys (n=4) at the Brevard Zoo on
Thursday through Sunday nights during the ToT event in October,
2015. Thursday and Sunday were considered baseline observations,
as ToT only ran on Friday and Saturday nights.
All the lights were turned off in the zoo, making observations
challenging. We used entry-level night-vision goggles to see the
monkeys, but they did not provide sufficient detail for reliable
individual identification (Figure 1). During the first min of each 10 min
period we observed the monkeys and coded whether they were
active (any movement or eyes visible), resting (no visible movement)
or inside (in their night building and not visible to researchers). This
totaled 202 data points for each of the four monkeys (101 data points
per monkey per condition, 808 total data points).
Additionally, we audio recorded the hour from 9:30 to 10:30 pm each
night. This allowed us to get an objective measure of the relative
degree of loudness during baseline and ToT observations.
Conclusions
• Spider monkeys changed their typical nighttime behavioral
patterns during ToT.
• They were outside much more frequently during ToT and were
likely active more as well, although this is less apparent when
controlling for visibility.
• This was likely a somewhat stressful event for the monkeys, as
they often appeared startled (rapid head movements and scanning
behavior) after actors and visitors screamed.
•  This will be systematically explored in 2016 with higher-
resolution night-vision goggles.
• However, to determine whether this event negatively effected their
welfare, we should explore how they would respond to naturally
occurring loud and startling events, such as thunderstorms.
Figure 1: Photograph of the spider monkeys through the night vision
goggles. Due to the relatively poor resolution, we were unable to take
detailed behavioral data.
References
Hosey, G. R. (2000). Zoo animals and their human audiences: What is the
visitor effect? Animal Welfare, 9, 343-357.
Davis, N., Schaffner, C. M., & Smith, T. E. (2005). Evidence that zoo visitors
influence HPA activity in spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyii rufiventris).
Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 90(2), 131-141.
Vrancken, A., Verheyen, R. F., & Elsacker, L. V. (1990). Preliminary study
on the influence of the visiting public on the spatial distribution in captive
eastern lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla graueri). Acta Zoologica et
Pathologica Antverpiensia (Belgium).
Figure 2: Percentage of total scans (not controlling for visibility) the
monkeys spent inside and active on baseline nights compared to ToT
nights.
*p < 0.05
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Inside Active
PercentageofScans
Behaviors by Condition
Baseline
ToT
* *

More Related Content

Similar to ToT_poster_ips_2016_sm

The Social Daily Activity Correlation of Olive Baboon (Papio Anubis) in Gash...
The Social Daily Activity Correlation of Olive Baboon (Papio  Anubis) in Gash...The Social Daily Activity Correlation of Olive Baboon (Papio  Anubis) in Gash...
The Social Daily Activity Correlation of Olive Baboon (Papio Anubis) in Gash...Sryahwa Publications
 
4. Temporal behaviors in squirrels
4. Temporal behaviors in squirrels4. Temporal behaviors in squirrels
4. Temporal behaviors in squirrelsNathan Hechtman
 
MAC 1105 2015-1 Test 2 Name _________________________________.docx
MAC 1105 2015-1 Test 2 Name _________________________________.docxMAC 1105 2015-1 Test 2 Name _________________________________.docx
MAC 1105 2015-1 Test 2 Name _________________________________.docxsmile790243
 
Agonistic Behaviour in Gulls
Agonistic Behaviour in GullsAgonistic Behaviour in Gulls
Agonistic Behaviour in GullsJames Duncan
 
Alexander et al 2016 Lizard Paper
Alexander et al 2016 Lizard PaperAlexander et al 2016 Lizard Paper
Alexander et al 2016 Lizard PaperStephanie Tang
 
Comparison of Echolocation by Sperm Whales and Spinner Dolphins
Comparison of Echolocation by Sperm Whales and Spinner DolphinsComparison of Echolocation by Sperm Whales and Spinner Dolphins
Comparison of Echolocation by Sperm Whales and Spinner DolphinsVictoria Nguyen
 
Taylor and Weary - Piglet vocs - 2000
Taylor and Weary - Piglet vocs - 2000Taylor and Weary - Piglet vocs - 2000
Taylor and Weary - Piglet vocs - 2000Allison Taylor
 
Ultraviolet reveals hemlock woolly adelgid predation CFSA13
Ultraviolet reveals hemlock woolly adelgid predation CFSA13Ultraviolet reveals hemlock woolly adelgid predation CFSA13
Ultraviolet reveals hemlock woolly adelgid predation CFSA13DrMcBug
 
From “Artificial” to “Real”: What 24/7 Home Cage Monitoring Teaches Us In Pre...
From “Artificial” to “Real”: What 24/7 Home Cage Monitoring Teaches Us In Pre...From “Artificial” to “Real”: What 24/7 Home Cage Monitoring Teaches Us In Pre...
From “Artificial” to “Real”: What 24/7 Home Cage Monitoring Teaches Us In Pre...InsideScientific
 
Insect orientation to various colors of lights in Sampaloc, San Rafael, Bulacan
Insect orientation to various colors of lights in Sampaloc, San Rafael, BulacanInsect orientation to various colors of lights in Sampaloc, San Rafael, Bulacan
Insect orientation to various colors of lights in Sampaloc, San Rafael, BulacanRenzel Santiago
 
ppt scope of animal behavior.pptx
ppt scope of animal behavior.pptxppt scope of animal behavior.pptx
ppt scope of animal behavior.pptxShivaniSharma217401
 
Herpetology Survey of Edith L. Moore Nature Sanctuary. Research by Dillon Jones
Herpetology Survey of Edith L. Moore Nature Sanctuary. Research by Dillon JonesHerpetology Survey of Edith L. Moore Nature Sanctuary. Research by Dillon Jones
Herpetology Survey of Edith L. Moore Nature Sanctuary. Research by Dillon JonesDillon Jones
 
THESIS DEFENSE
THESIS DEFENSETHESIS DEFENSE
THESIS DEFENSEJose Chapa
 
Burgess Shale Essay
Burgess Shale EssayBurgess Shale Essay
Burgess Shale EssayJulie May
 
Deep time and the tree of life
Deep time and the tree of lifeDeep time and the tree of life
Deep time and the tree of lifeLuke Harmon
 
Appearance of a Predator Increases the Avoidance Exhibited by Songbirds
Appearance of a Predator Increases the Avoidance Exhibited by SongbirdsAppearance of a Predator Increases the Avoidance Exhibited by Songbirds
Appearance of a Predator Increases the Avoidance Exhibited by SongbirdsAlexis Ernst
 
70 aspic viper movements
70 aspic viper movements70 aspic viper movements
70 aspic viper movementsRoger Meek
 
X International conference on Behaviour, Physiology and Genetic of Wildlife -...
X International conference on Behaviour, Physiology and Genetic of Wildlife -...X International conference on Behaviour, Physiology and Genetic of Wildlife -...
X International conference on Behaviour, Physiology and Genetic of Wildlife -...Dalila Frasson
 
Thesis absolute final checked M Wilson
Thesis absolute final checked M WilsonThesis absolute final checked M Wilson
Thesis absolute final checked M WilsonMichael Wilson
 

Similar to ToT_poster_ips_2016_sm (20)

The Social Daily Activity Correlation of Olive Baboon (Papio Anubis) in Gash...
The Social Daily Activity Correlation of Olive Baboon (Papio  Anubis) in Gash...The Social Daily Activity Correlation of Olive Baboon (Papio  Anubis) in Gash...
The Social Daily Activity Correlation of Olive Baboon (Papio Anubis) in Gash...
 
4. Temporal behaviors in squirrels
4. Temporal behaviors in squirrels4. Temporal behaviors in squirrels
4. Temporal behaviors in squirrels
 
MAC 1105 2015-1 Test 2 Name _________________________________.docx
MAC 1105 2015-1 Test 2 Name _________________________________.docxMAC 1105 2015-1 Test 2 Name _________________________________.docx
MAC 1105 2015-1 Test 2 Name _________________________________.docx
 
Agonistic Behaviour in Gulls
Agonistic Behaviour in GullsAgonistic Behaviour in Gulls
Agonistic Behaviour in Gulls
 
Alexander et al 2016 Lizard Paper
Alexander et al 2016 Lizard PaperAlexander et al 2016 Lizard Paper
Alexander et al 2016 Lizard Paper
 
Comparison of Echolocation by Sperm Whales and Spinner Dolphins
Comparison of Echolocation by Sperm Whales and Spinner DolphinsComparison of Echolocation by Sperm Whales and Spinner Dolphins
Comparison of Echolocation by Sperm Whales and Spinner Dolphins
 
Taylor and Weary - Piglet vocs - 2000
Taylor and Weary - Piglet vocs - 2000Taylor and Weary - Piglet vocs - 2000
Taylor and Weary - Piglet vocs - 2000
 
Ultraviolet reveals hemlock woolly adelgid predation CFSA13
Ultraviolet reveals hemlock woolly adelgid predation CFSA13Ultraviolet reveals hemlock woolly adelgid predation CFSA13
Ultraviolet reveals hemlock woolly adelgid predation CFSA13
 
From “Artificial” to “Real”: What 24/7 Home Cage Monitoring Teaches Us In Pre...
From “Artificial” to “Real”: What 24/7 Home Cage Monitoring Teaches Us In Pre...From “Artificial” to “Real”: What 24/7 Home Cage Monitoring Teaches Us In Pre...
From “Artificial” to “Real”: What 24/7 Home Cage Monitoring Teaches Us In Pre...
 
Justin sigma xi
Justin sigma xiJustin sigma xi
Justin sigma xi
 
Insect orientation to various colors of lights in Sampaloc, San Rafael, Bulacan
Insect orientation to various colors of lights in Sampaloc, San Rafael, BulacanInsect orientation to various colors of lights in Sampaloc, San Rafael, Bulacan
Insect orientation to various colors of lights in Sampaloc, San Rafael, Bulacan
 
ppt scope of animal behavior.pptx
ppt scope of animal behavior.pptxppt scope of animal behavior.pptx
ppt scope of animal behavior.pptx
 
Herpetology Survey of Edith L. Moore Nature Sanctuary. Research by Dillon Jones
Herpetology Survey of Edith L. Moore Nature Sanctuary. Research by Dillon JonesHerpetology Survey of Edith L. Moore Nature Sanctuary. Research by Dillon Jones
Herpetology Survey of Edith L. Moore Nature Sanctuary. Research by Dillon Jones
 
THESIS DEFENSE
THESIS DEFENSETHESIS DEFENSE
THESIS DEFENSE
 
Burgess Shale Essay
Burgess Shale EssayBurgess Shale Essay
Burgess Shale Essay
 
Deep time and the tree of life
Deep time and the tree of lifeDeep time and the tree of life
Deep time and the tree of life
 
Appearance of a Predator Increases the Avoidance Exhibited by Songbirds
Appearance of a Predator Increases the Avoidance Exhibited by SongbirdsAppearance of a Predator Increases the Avoidance Exhibited by Songbirds
Appearance of a Predator Increases the Avoidance Exhibited by Songbirds
 
70 aspic viper movements
70 aspic viper movements70 aspic viper movements
70 aspic viper movements
 
X International conference on Behaviour, Physiology and Genetic of Wildlife -...
X International conference on Behaviour, Physiology and Genetic of Wildlife -...X International conference on Behaviour, Physiology and Genetic of Wildlife -...
X International conference on Behaviour, Physiology and Genetic of Wildlife -...
 
Thesis absolute final checked M Wilson
Thesis absolute final checked M WilsonThesis absolute final checked M Wilson
Thesis absolute final checked M Wilson
 

ToT_poster_ips_2016_sm

  • 1. Results From the audio recordings, we found the root mean squared (RMS) amplitude, a relative measure of loudness not dependent on the human hearing range, of each audio file using Sox (sox.sourceforge.net). The mean RMS amplitude of ToT nights (M = 0.0239, SE 0.001) was significantly greater, and thus louder, than baseline nights (M = 0.0154, SE 0.003), t(4) = -2.74, p = 0.026. At night, the monkeys had access to both their exhibit yard and a night-house. If the animals were inside, they were out of view of the researchers. When controlling for visibility, there was no significant difference between the percentages of scans the monkeys were active when comparing baseline and ToT (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = 0.983). However, the monkeys were inside during 40.8% of scans in the baseline condition and only 0.5% of scans during ToT (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, one- tailed p = 0.034, Figure 2). Thus, the monkeys were outside far more often during ToT. Given the large difference in where the monkeys spent time (inside or outside) during ToT, we also analyzed the data without controlling for visibility. In these analyses, we retain the data points where the monkeys were not visible. Thus, we compared the proportion of scans in which we know the monkeys were active to the total number of scans, rather than only the scans in which the animals were visible. The proportion of scans in which the animals were active was significantly higher during ToT observations compared to baseline (Dependent Proportions Test, Z = 3.9, p < 0.001, Figure 2). This indicates that activity levels, or at least outside activity levels, were much higher during the ToT event, suggesting the event interrupted their typical resting pattern. Florida Institute of Technology – 2016 The effect of a nighttime zoo event on spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi) behavior D. Proctor, H. Gedde, B. Baldrica, E. Burch, J. Kramer, J. Swanson and C. Vergason Florida Institute of Technology Introduction The relationship between zoo visitors and animals, particularly primates, is a complicated one and there is little consensus in the literature on whether visitors cause stress, provide enrichment or do not affect the animals (Hosey, 2000), although this varies by species. For example, spider monkeys have higher urinary cortisol levels when more visitors are present (Davis, Schaffner, & Smith, 2005). Yet, there are also reports of other primates seeking visitor interactions (Vrancken, Van Elsacker, & Verheyen, 1990). To gain more information about this relationship and to ensure animal wellness, it is important to monitor animal behavior in zoos when adding new visitor experiences. This is particularly true in regards to late-night zoo events, as there has been little research on how events outside of the typical operating hours affect animal behavior. In October, 2015, Brevard Zoo in Melbourne, FL, USA added a new late-night (8-12 pm), Halloween-themed visitor experience. The “Trail of Terror” (ToT; runforyourfreakinlife.com) was a haunted house style event where visitors walk through the woods surrounding the zoo and actors startled them at certain locations on the trail. One such startle point was located approximately 20 yards from the spider monkey exhibit. To determine what effect, if any, this event had on the behavior of these diurnal monkeys, we monitored their behavior during the event and on baseline nights with no visitors present. Methods We observed the spider monkeys (n=4) at the Brevard Zoo on Thursday through Sunday nights during the ToT event in October, 2015. Thursday and Sunday were considered baseline observations, as ToT only ran on Friday and Saturday nights. All the lights were turned off in the zoo, making observations challenging. We used entry-level night-vision goggles to see the monkeys, but they did not provide sufficient detail for reliable individual identification (Figure 1). During the first min of each 10 min period we observed the monkeys and coded whether they were active (any movement or eyes visible), resting (no visible movement) or inside (in their night building and not visible to researchers). This totaled 202 data points for each of the four monkeys (101 data points per monkey per condition, 808 total data points). Additionally, we audio recorded the hour from 9:30 to 10:30 pm each night. This allowed us to get an objective measure of the relative degree of loudness during baseline and ToT observations. Conclusions • Spider monkeys changed their typical nighttime behavioral patterns during ToT. • They were outside much more frequently during ToT and were likely active more as well, although this is less apparent when controlling for visibility. • This was likely a somewhat stressful event for the monkeys, as they often appeared startled (rapid head movements and scanning behavior) after actors and visitors screamed. •  This will be systematically explored in 2016 with higher- resolution night-vision goggles. • However, to determine whether this event negatively effected their welfare, we should explore how they would respond to naturally occurring loud and startling events, such as thunderstorms. Figure 1: Photograph of the spider monkeys through the night vision goggles. Due to the relatively poor resolution, we were unable to take detailed behavioral data. References Hosey, G. R. (2000). Zoo animals and their human audiences: What is the visitor effect? Animal Welfare, 9, 343-357. Davis, N., Schaffner, C. M., & Smith, T. E. (2005). Evidence that zoo visitors influence HPA activity in spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyii rufiventris). Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 90(2), 131-141. Vrancken, A., Verheyen, R. F., & Elsacker, L. V. (1990). Preliminary study on the influence of the visiting public on the spatial distribution in captive eastern lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla graueri). Acta Zoologica et Pathologica Antverpiensia (Belgium). Figure 2: Percentage of total scans (not controlling for visibility) the monkeys spent inside and active on baseline nights compared to ToT nights. *p < 0.05 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Inside Active PercentageofScans Behaviors by Condition Baseline ToT * *