This performance evaluation is for Jayme Veiro-Smith, a Micro-Computer Tech Specialist at Park Ridge Elementary. The evaluation rates Mr. Veiro-Smith's performance in several categories on a scale from Unsatisfactory to Excels. He receives positive ratings in all categories, including following directives, completing assignments in a timely manner, being hard working and professional, and having an excellent working relationship with staff. His overall performance is rated as "Excels", surpassing job requirements.

1. The School Board of Broward County, Florida
NON-INSTR~UCTIONAL EMPLOYEE
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Name (Last)
Veiro-Smith
(First)
Jayme
From
78030
(Initial) PeriodCovered
-08l11J09- To -'16105/09
Mo. Day Yr. Mo. Day Yr.
Classification: fStatus:
__ M_ic_r_o-_C_o_m_p_u__t_e_r_T_ec_.h_S_p_e_c L Permanent
SchooVDepartment:
Park Ridge Elementary
rte ProbationEnds:
L
ReasonforReview:
oEND OF PROBATION ~ ANNUAL REV!EW 0 OTHER
----- ..---------~-------------.!
CheckItems:
iElExcels liJ Satisfactory [NJ Needs Improvement
CommentsI. QUANTITY OF WORK
~J Amount of work performed
PersonnelNumber:
W Unsatisfactory ~ Not Applicable
CommentsII. QUALITY OF WORK
[fJ Accuracy
[-81 The achievement of objectives; effectiveness
m Initiative and resourcefulness
l..§..J Neatness of work product
eNAl Other __ .__n _
III. ~K HABITS
l.§J Attendance
LfJ Observance of work hours
m Completion of work on schedule
[TI Compliance with rules, policies, and directives
[NAI Safety practice
I NA I Use of tools and equipment
L~ Other
IV. PERSONAL RELATIONS
~_J With fellow employees
~ With supervisors
It ] With public
V. SUPERVISORY PERFORMANCE (If applicable)
INA I Efficiency and effectiveness of work unit
[NA] Training and development
INA I Personnel Management
INA I Decision-making and delegating
INA 1 Safety record
Mr. Veiro-Smth follows directives and completes his job
assignments in a timely manner.
Comments
Mr. Veiro-Smith is hard working and remains professional at all
times.
Comments
Mr. Veiro-Smith has an excellent working relationship with the
entire staff.
Comments
RATER'S OVERALL EVALUATION
o Unsatisfactory: Performance is inadequate and must be corrected.
D Needs Improvement: Performance does not fully meet job requirements as indicated below.
nSatisfactory: Employee is performing as required and expected in an entirely satisfactory manner.
[g] Excels: Performance surpasses job requirements
if an employee IS eligible for permanent status, cheCkfoiiowlng Withihe 0Granted 0Denied OR 0 Extended
employee's written permission. (Attached)
If an employee was rated "Unsatisfactory" when will another evaluation be conducted? DATE:
-------
___ Months
IN WHAT WAYS CAN OR MUST THE EMPLOYEE IMPROVE PERFORMANCE?
Evaluator's Signature
REV. 7/05