This document discusses contrarian approaches to airport terminal design that focus on improving the passenger experience. It outlines how past terminal designs have evolved incrementally without questioning assumptions. The document advocates rethinking all aspects of the terminal to improve wayfinding, uplift passengers, and optimize operations instead of focusing on retail or civic pride. Examples discussed include inverting the terminal layout to simplify arrivals routing and moving from lower to higher spaces for departures. The goal is to design every touchpoint to enhance perceptions and turn aircraft efficiently.
14. The evolution of airport terminal design
has been a series of small steps over the
past decades, often catching up to new
demands of the air carriers or the airport.
15. What happens if we take a different
approach to many of the “givens?”
16. Do we end up with a significantly different—and
potentially better—end result for the passenger?
17. Do airports and air carriers get better
facilities than they otherwise might?
18. Rethinking what the
terminal can be requires:
1. Asking the most basic questions—
the ones we think have already
been answered
2. Thinking about what remains
tiresome to the passenger
3. Avoiding preconceived solutions
25. Actually, we should not confuse the city hall with the airport.
Gateways are only evident to the arriving passenger,
not departing…and we often don’t do much for the
arriving passenger to “announce” where they are.
42. The departures sequence and arrivals sequence
require different spaces in terminals. They don’t
neatly stack. We see an opportunity to avoid
overbuilding by re-thinking the alignment.