Argumentative Essays On Gun Control

Argumentative Essay On Gun Control
The Second Amendment states, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free
State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." People interpret the
Second Amendment to mean that all people have the right to own guns, but not all people should be
able to own them. "In 2007, 385,178 total firearm crimes were committed, including 11,512 murders,
190,514 robberies, and 183,153 aggravated assaults" (Giffords). The United States government must
have stronger laws about purchasing guns.
The United States government can have stronger gun laws by increasing requirements to own a
gun. Background checks will help the government decide whether someone is capable of owning
and buying a firearm. The background checks will make sure that all prior information of criminal
activity is given and recorded by federal and state directories for restricted owners and buyers of
guns (Giffords). Background checks should help eliminate the amount of guns being sold to
irresponsible people and being used for unnecessary shootings in all communities....show more
content...
In the Second Amendment it says, "... the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be
infringed" (LII par. 1). Some people interpret the Second Amendment to say that all people have an
individual constitutional right to own guns. However, the Amendment was created before machine
guns and other dangerous firearms were invented. Therefore, people do not possess the authority to
own all types of firearms. "As a result of the Firearm Owners' Protection Act (FOPA), a person may
not make, manufacture, or import a machine gun unless it is for a government entity" (Giffords par.
14). No person, unless directed by the government, for a special purpose, has the right to own the
most dangerous weapons. Even though there is a constitiutional right to own guns, not all people
should be able to own
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Marshun Jones
Ms. Wilks
English IV
I was interested in this after the recent shootings in the U.S
The gun control Act of 1968 was passed after the assassinations of both president John F. Kennedy,
the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Robert F. Kennedy. It banned interstate mail orders of all
firearms, interstate handgun sales and weapons with no "sporting purpose. "It prohibited the sale of
firearms to minors, felony, fugitives, drug addicts and these committed to a mental institution. And
then allowed the sale of machine guns manufactured after May 19, 1986. The violent crime control
and law environment Act of 1994 banned the possession, transfer or domestic weapons for 10 years.
The debate over gun control in the United States has...show more content...
Gun–control advocates sought to rekindle the debate following another string of deadly mass
shootings in 2015, including the killing of nine people at a church in Charleston, South Carolina,
and 14 at a community center in San Bernardino, California. These advocates often highlight the
stricter gun laws and lower incidence of gun violence in several other democracies, like Japan and
Australia, but many others say this correlation proves little and note that rates of gun crime in the
United States have plunged over the last two decades.The current Constitution of Japan was
promulgated on November 3, 1946, and came into effect on May 3, 1947. China's expanding
military and growing assertiveness has been bolstered by weapons cloned from the arsenals of other
countries. It is not only American weapon designs and technology that have been stolen and
replicated by the Chinese. Russia has at times served as China's unwitting research and development
department. China bought two dozen of the fighters but later negotiated for a license to assemble
additional planes domestically using key components imported from Russia. Gun control in Japan,
combined with the prevailing respect for authority, has led to a more harmonious relationship
between civilians and the police than in the US. It's something of

Gun Control
Although gun control laws are made to prevent violent outcomes, the influence which laws carry are
the complete opposite to what one would think. Ever since the ratification of the Second
Amendment, the debate on gun control has become a very heated topic. There is one side that
believes that guns should be banned in order to stop any future tragedies from occurring. On the
other hand, there is another side that believes guns are our cherished right to own and we should be
allowed to use them freely. Even though many gun advocates believe that guns should be used in its
continued free fashion, there are many tragic events occurring in the US almost everyday, that
should lead to the scrutinization of guns.
The Second Amendment...show more content...
Although this event was mainly overseen, this occurrence added insult to injury as talks about gun
control revolved around this issue, but no initial laws nor decisions were made. In the past twenty
years, there has been an increase of major gun laws that have been able to prevent some tragedies
and the wrongful sale of guns.
Even though we are at a point where society has changed in the US, gun control has still been a
controversial subject that doesn't seem to have any compromise coming in its near future. Although
guns can't be directly banned, there have been many bills enacted in order to decrease the countless
occasions of gun violence, such as adding background checks and adding tougher guidelines for
purchasing a gun. In this article written by Abby Norman, she says, "It wasn't until 1993 that
background checks were instituted as a precursor to gun ownership which came as part of the Brady
Handgun Violence Prevention Act" (Norman, 2015). This law implemented a five day waiting
period for a licensed manufacturer, seller, or importer to sell, transfer, or deliver a handgun to
someone who is unlicensed. At first, this Act was successful as it was able to prevent the selling
of over 70,000 handguns, although just four years later, the law ceased to apply in November
1998. In the same, President Bill Clinton enact a newer and broader version of the Brady Act, which
was brought along with other rules as it now applied to

Samira Rastegar
Argumentative Essay
ESOL 0054 – 81003
Dr. Dogger
Nov 15, 2017
The Gun Control
Gun control is a controversial topic that has been around for decades in the United States and all
around the world. After the recent terrible events, it has become an issue of controversy between the
two groups that agree and disagree with gun control. Between 1970 and 2000, firearm injuries in the
United States annually has 32,703 deaths. After motor–vehicle crashes, firearm injuries are second
leading reason of injury and death in the United States.Majority of people that are against with gun
control believe that gun can help them for self–defense in home and society. However, other people
believe that if we reduce the number of guns in our society, we will reduce the amount of
violence. There are many reasons for gun control. Let's focus on three main reasons: manic people,
economy issue, and accident by children. First, the crazy person is one of the reason of gun
control. Studies show, increased risk of committing to violence against other if people have serious
mental illness like schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depression. Individually if perpetrators are
using drug and alcohol, and they are not tacking medical treatment. (Cook, Goss 71). Also, review
of more than 20 studies showed that commit to violence among mentally ill people are three to five
times more than other people. (Cook, Goss 72). For example, the gunman behind the worst mass
shooting in Texas

Chance Pressley
Mrs. Gallos
English 3
21 November 2017
Gun Control
The topic of gun control is a a very talked about and subjective topic and has many different
opinions and various extremes. First off, gun control can mean anything from having background
checks or waiting periods when buying guns to taking away guns completely. Most people agree
that background checks are necessary to keep guns out of people with bad intentions hands because a
gun itself is a very neutral object and can be used for any amount of good or bad as can any other
object. However, it is much easier for a person with bad intent to hurt more people with a gun then
say a stick or another neutral object. The danger of a weapon is completely up to the person in
control of the weapon.
The first argument of people in favor of gun control is, of course, If people don't have guns, they
can't kill people (or as many people). This makes sense because most mass mass killings and
murders are a result of a person with bad intent gaining possession of a gun. However, would a
stricter gun policy really help? People against gun control think not. There are various subjective
arguments but the facts are simple, the correlation between accessibility of guns and crime with
guns, if any, is that the less accessible the guns are the higher the gun violence is. This is made
very clear with studies from other countries who have very strict gun control policies. Which only
brings us back to the idea that guns are just neutral objects and can only be controlled by the person
in possession of the weapon.
One major problem that those against gun control have is that having guns is a right to every
American Citizen listed in the Second Amendment. "A well regulated militia, being necessary to
the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed"
("Second Amendment"). This is one of the major obstacles of those in a favor of gun control and a
key point in the argument of those against gun control. This is argued subjectively by those in favor
of gun control with saying that times have changed and guns are no longer needed in today's
society. However, as long as the Second Amendment is in place, guns will be legal.

Indeed, the United States has a long tradition of holding guns. The public opinion with guns is
deeply based. A survey conducted by the Pew Research Center in 2017 showed that 48% of the
population grew up in armed families; 72% believed that most people should have the right to
have guns or that almost everyone had the right to hold guns; 61% believed that the people have
the right to hold almost all types of firearms or most types of firearms; 56% believe that gunners
should be allowed to hold guns in almost any location or in most places. The right to hold guns is
both a constitutional provision and a "political correctness," and gun control faces many practical
resistances. However, with the continuous occurrence of vicious shooting incidents,...show more
content...
On the issue of gun legislation, the Democratic Party tends to establish a strict gun control law and
tries to pass it through the National Assembly. The Republican Party, on the other hand, strives to
prevent the passage of laws and regulations from the standpoint of fighting for party interests such as
voters and election expenses. Therefore, the bill proposed by the Democrats is difficult to pass in the
Senate, where the Republicans dominate. Since most of the constituency divisions in the House of
Representatives are decided by Republican–controlled state legislatures, the Republicans have more
"stable" seats than Democrats do. In the constituencies of these members of the House of
Representatives, politicians are more sensitive to their voters, and these voters are also more
inclined to vote on popular issues such as gun rights. The penalty for offending these voters is much
higher than alienating voters who support gun control, because voters who support gun control often
do not participate in the Republican primary election. The demographic structure also played a role
in the support of the House of Representatives in support of guns, because the proportion of gun
owners is higher in urban areas than in urban areas. Even

Gun Control Argumentative Essay
Argumentative Gun Control Paper The issue of Gun Control has been on the minds of humans
for hundreds of years. How do we protect ourselves and our loved ones? How do we keep such a
dangerous weapon out of the hands of the wrong person? Inside the Second Amendment we are
granted the right to Bear Arms. Having that amendment gives each person the ability to carry a
weapon if they choose, so how can we control who should or shouldn't carry? According to an
article evaluated from Kovandizic and Marvell, each year in America we can see the most violent
crimes have been committed using firearms. "In 2000 firearms were involved in 66% of homicides,
26% of robberies, 6% of aggravated assaults, and 8% of all violent crime victims faced...show more
content...
This group has very strong ties with many members of legislation; it also has many lobbyists and
supporters in our government. Among the many members of congress, former presidents George
Bush and Ronald Reagan were and are members of the NRA. One of the NRA's most noticeable
acts happened a few years ago, they tried to repeal the ban on assault weapons.
The second group mentioned was the Gun Owners of America. The Gun Owners of America is
another group that is against gun control. The GOA preserves and defends the rights of gun owners
through legislation. They publish books, articles, and videos on gun issues and how those issues
affect people. They also conduct seminars for the press and Congress about issues on the Second
Amendment, and gun issues. The GOA opposes bans on semiautomatic weapons, armor piercing
ammunition, and handguns.
You know a little about two major groups for gun control, now let's take a look at a couple groups
that are pro–gun control. The major group for gun control is Handgun Control, Inc. (HCI), which
is headed by Sarah Brady. Mrs. Brady is the wife of James Brady, who was shot during an attempt
on President Reagan's life in 1981. Another major group is the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence
(CSGV), which was formerly known as the National Coalition to Ban Handguns. The CSGV
believes that handguns

America should have less gun control Some pro gun control activists would have you believe that
all guns do is murder innocent people but there are countless stories of women using guns to stop
rapists or homeowners detailing home invaders with guns. It goes without a doubt that the woman
would have been raped, or the family would have been robbed, however with the ability to possess
guns these such tragedies are preventable for all families. Gun control can't touch illegal guns and
gun control only disarms legal citizens, and gun control is an attack on the second amendment. Guns
have become such a huge problem, that they have made their way into the black market. Often the
gun is not used by the original owner. "In crimes, only 13 percent...show more content...
The second amendment reads, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free
state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." Many would claim that
the second part of the amendment is merely an extension of the first, it is ridiculous to believe that
any free state could maintain its own militia or sense of security without the right for its citizens to
own their own guns. This claim is supported by the supreme District of Columbia v. Heller by a 5–4
vote allows citizens to possess guns for lawful purposes such as self defense. Guns are a basic right
of american citizen that exist for both self defense and recreation. Many guns are never even used by
their original, registered owners, if they are even registered at all. America's current gun control can't
touch these guns but only disarm it's citizens. Gun control is directly a infringement upon our
unalienable rights, the constitution. America does not have a problem with guns, America has a
problem with improper gun owners. We need to stop limiting gun control and start properly taking
the steps to disarm criminals, wake up

Dakota Pigg
Mrs.Gallos
English 3
21 November 2017
Gun Control
A common controversial topic that is discussed universally is the issue of shootings and gun use.
Citizens views on the topic range from the wishes to completely ban guns, to the total allowance
and ownership of such items. In comparison, some drugs may be illegal, although people still
possess them. Would the same be for guns? Should more be done to implement the control over
guns? Or should more freedom be given to gun owners? One can visualize the positives and
negatives regarding gun control by learning more about the following: the suspected terrorist list,
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is constantly adding new names to a list of suspected
terrorist....show more content...
These trends and patterns are indicative of the use of black market practices to obtain various
weapons by groups that the FBI and other law enforcement have been attempting to limit access to
weapons. Well known terrorist, Farook, who was involved in the San Bernardino terrorist attack
demonstrated the use of acquiring weapons through the black market as he went through friends and
neighbors to gather weapons he would not be able to get himself.
Some studies show, like the one coordinated by Cato, bans on certain guns in five states did not lead
to a decline in gun crime when compared to the other forty–five states, but an increase.
This counter argument is supported by evidence from VPC where they organized a study called
Firearm Justifiable Homicides and Non–Fatal Self Defense Gun Use, "In 2012, for every justifiable
homicide in the United States involving a firearm, guns were used in 32 criminal homicides."
(Whittenburg). During 2012 there were 8,342 homicides total. Given these points, guns were
scarcely used for self–defense and in turn used in criminal homicides.
Bailey, David. "Does Gun Control Encourage Crime? The Science of Crime Statistics."
huffingtonpost.com. Oath Inc, 3 Aug. 2016. Web. 15 Nov. 2017.
Cook, Philip. "How dangerous people get

What is gun control? Who is affected by Gun Control? Why should someone care about Gun
Control? Imagine going to a concert with your friends and family, you guys are laughing and
having a good time when all of sudden someone starts shooting up the place. Are you thinking to
yourself that if guns were banned this wouldn't have never happened? Or are you wishing you
had a gun to protect everyone from what is happening? Gun Control has been an issue since the
beginning of time, there are some people who think we need it and others who say we have the
right to bear arms. With gun control a lot more lives could be saved and people won't have to be
scared of a mass shootings happening somewhere. Kids can feel safe when going to school and they
won't have to worry about one of their class mates shooting up the school.
Gun Control is a set of laws or policies that regulate the sale or use of firearms by civilians. Guns
have a high rate of killing or injuring someone, which makes this a primary topic for gun control
policies. Even with a good reason to have gun control, it is still one of the most difficult topics in
American politics. Criminals are affected by gun control because they won't be able to have easy
access to getting a gun. Families are also affected in some way, for one with gun control families
won't have to be scared of a mass shootings happening because Gun Control will be put in place.
People need to care about this because kids,women and men could have been saved from some of
these mass shootings we have had over the last couple of months. Families wouldn't have to
mourn for their loved ones, if people can just see why this is such a big issue and be able to find a
way to stop all of these killings and shootings.
Having gun control can save a lot of lives and could have stop events that shouldn't have
happened. For Example, the Las Vegas shooting and Columbine High School shooting could have
all been avoided if these shooters were not able to get easy access to all of these guns. For the Las
Vegas shooting, Stephen Paddock who killed 58 people was able to get 23firearm and hundreds of
rounds of ammunition.The police also found 19 more guns and thousands of rounds of ammunition
in his house. It's not

Gun control in the United States is a very controversial topic in today's political society, leaving the
nation divided into two sides with two strongly opinionated beliefs. This all started with the increase
in the amount of mass shootings and an overall increase in gun violence. The two sides consist of
the liberal point of view and the conservative point of view. The liberals believe that the availability
of firearms to the people in the country is a major issue, and that the U.S. government is at fault for
the mass shootings due to the lenient regulations on guns. In retaliation, the conservatives argue that
having a gun is a God given right, that the Second Amendment of The Constitution. Although the
availability of guns is seen to be...show more content...
has a sin tax on harmful substances such as cigarettes and alcohol, so why are there none on gun
regulation? Putting a tax on the price of guns could potentially decrease the overall percentage of
purchase of guns. In the U.S. simple regulated background checks are required by licensed firearm
dealers, yet there is no mandatory check when exchanging a weapon privately, while in other
countries such as Canada background checks are mandatory across all firearm exchanges and focus
on the buyer's mental health and addiction history. The United States could learn how to keep citizens
safer by examining other areas' regulations. "California has America's strictest gun laws. This means
that prospective gun owners must hold a Firearms Safety Certificate, submit to a waiting period like
in Canada, buy weapons only through licensed dealers, and possess only a 'California legal' gun that
complies with restrictions on what can and cannot be sold inside the state." (https:/
/www.nationalobserver.com/2015/12/04/news
/how–american–gun–deaths–and–gun–laws–compare–canadas). Compared to Canada's gun laws
these are seen as fairly lenient. According to the CDC's National Center for Health Statistics,
California is on the lower end of the spectrum when it comes to gun violence per capita, evidence
shows that (as of 2014) California's death rate is 7.4 per 100,000 people, compared to a much
smaller state with lenient gun

Would you ever want to die or have one of your family members die from a gun? I have had
friends that experienced a family member dying from guns or firearm suicide. People in the
community would feel safer from gun threats and gun violence. More Gun control laws should be
enacted in the United States to stop gun violence and firearm suicide. The United States has one of
the highest rates of guns in the world. A study by Matt Doeden indicates the USA leads out of 178
countries with small firearms. Another study by Lynn Langton found that 1.4 million guns were
stolen from US homes during property crimes just between the years of 2005 and 2010.
Obviously, a lot of guns that may have been owned legally by decent people were stolen by
criminals, who probably sold them or used them to do terrible things. Michael Planty and Jennifer L.
Truman found that ".79% of victims protected themselves with a firearm out 29,618,300 crimes
committed between 2007 and 2011." The USA has more guns than most countries in the world, but
that does not mean we are a safer country....show more content...
In fact, people in our society are more scared of terrorism than guns. But Carol Hand noted in a
recent article that, "Between 2005 and 2015, only 71 Americans died in terrorism attacks on US
soil, while 301,797 died from gun violence." Through those ten years gun deaths outnumbered
terrorism greatly. According to CDC statistics, there were 464,033 total gun deaths between 1999
and 2013. 58.2% suicide, 37.7% homicide, and 2.2% unintentional. The CDC data also indicates
that between 1999 and 2013, there were 270,237 firearm suicides. There are a lot of deaths from
guns in the United

In the USA, Americans have right to own guns, and this is for self– protection. However, many
people are trying to take over advantage of the law by using guns to apply physical attack on
someone. This makes the issues of regulating the access, ownership, and use of guns are paramount
importance. The question of whether guns should be controlled touches the core of the country's
national security. Many Americans think thatgun control is wrong because guns do not kill people,
people do. If a person wants to kill someone, there are millions ways for him to do his dreadful
action without guns. Also, guns do provide protections. On the other hand, many others agree that
gun control should be enforced. With the widespread all of the incidences of unpurposed mass
shootings on the media, several proponents have had to question the existing legal on gun control in
the USA. Civilians should be kept away from guns to...show more content...
While most opponents of strict gun control ague that people should be allowed to own guns because
of their own self–defense. Also, those opponents show their evidence that their right to own gun is a
part of Second Amendment. Many Americans choose to interpret this to mean that civilians could
have the right to bear arms, but the key words in the law are 'well–regulated militia', which imply
that the groups or individuals owning guns must be well regulated. Therefore, when Americans are
trained properly, guns now will be the truest meaning of self–protection. In addition, many
Americans even take advantage of the "well–regulated militia" quote to do crimes. For example,
there was a veteran who found out his wife cheated on him. While he was in anger, he used his
handgun to shoot at his wife. This implies that most of the crimes committed using civilian held guns
is not for self–defense, but rather for purposes of committing violent

Gun Control In discussion of gun control, one controversial belief has been that banning certain
guns, ammo, and clips will reduce the amount of crime involving guns. On one hand, liberals
argue that this will decrease the amount of crimes because there are less guns out there. On the
other hand, conservatives contend that this is not true. Some even believe that crime might
increase due to this. My own view is that banning these items will have a negative impact on our
society, and here is why. The first reason that I don't think it would have a positive effect is
because criminals don't obey the law anyway so why would this change their availability of
firearms? Just because drugs are illegal doesn't mean one still can't obtain them, so how would
this be any different with firearms? One could buy pretty much anything their heart desires on
the black market, including human body parts, and many kinds of drugs. "Mexico has some of
the strictest gun control laws in the world and yet, in 2012, Mexico had 11,309 gun murders
(9.97 gun homicides per 100,000 people) compared to the United States that had 9,146 gun
homicides (2.97 per 100,000 people)" (should more gun control laws be enacted). With that being
said, how come some believe that we should have more strict gun laws simply because other
countries do, are we striving to be like Mexico, one might hope not. One could buy pretty much
anything their heart desires on the black market, including human body parts, and many kinds of
drugs. Making firearms illegal would not help solve anything, in fact I think it would make matters
worse. The effects of the government banning guns could lead to a crisis in America because it
would take away law abiding gun owner's protection. "The October 2015 Gallup survey showed a
higher rate of 43 percent, including guns kept on property outside the home" (Ingraham). 43 percent
of Americans are gunowners that would suffer from the government banning guns; people that could
potentially use these for self–defense in the occurrence of a robbery or assault. According to
gunowners.org: Guns used 2.5 million times a year in self–defense. Law–abiding citizens use guns
to defend themselves against criminals as many as 2.5 million times

Over the last few years, homicides due to firearms have seen a large increase in commonality and
the debate over gun ownership is as impassioned as ever before. On one hand, avid gun owners cite
the 2nd Amendment and their constitutional right to bear arms as reason to maintain possession over
their firearms. On the other hand though, many fanatics believe that guns should not be accessible to
any member of society, exempt of course for only members of the law enforcement or their country's
military. However, weighing all the possible options and providing resources for strictergun control
laws could help save the lives of many countless victims. Currently, there are over 33,000 gun
related deaths per year, coupled with over 370 mass shootings...show more content...
Currently, each store must conduct a background check that consists of asking of prior convictions
and commitments to mental institutions from the potential buyer. If in the case that the buyer is
deemed fit for purchase, they can likely walk out of the store with a gun, including a high–powered
automatic rifle, the same day. However, if their application is flagged a more extensive
background check is conducted, rightfully so. Nonetheless, rejections only occur in less than 1%
of gun applications and more often than not uninformed and untrained citizens become gun
owners if they apply (LePore 4). Even members of the "No Fly List," a list for potential domestic
terrorists, who aren't allowed to board American flights, are often allowed to obtain a gun license
without much thorough investigation to their background as long as they haven't been labeled
mentally disabled. Such is the case with the Orlando's gay nightclub shooter last year, Omar
Mateen. Mateen, was a suspected terrorist, who although was on the "No Fly List," was still
allowed to obtain a highly powered automatic weapon just days before his unprovoked massacre. By
applying a more thorough required background process, gun stores face much less risk of selling to a
potentially unstable person with ulterior motives than

Argumentative Essay Gun Control
English 101
Argumentative/Persuasive Essay
4/12/2013
Word Count 1,255
Readability 12.3
There are new proposed gun control laws in the aftermath of the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary
School in Newton, Connecticut that occurred on December 14th, 2012. This incident claimed the
lives of twenty 1st graders and six adults and has set the government in motion to try to prevent
future acts of violence by strengthening gun control laws in the United States (Smith). This has been
a topic that has been an extremely emotional debate with people on both sides unwilling to
compromise. Gun advocates and critics of the new proposed gun laws argue that these new laws
infringe on our constitutional...show more content...
There is also a focus on safety in schools and offering more help to the mentally ill. Also, the
government is proposing tougher penalties for people who purchase guns with the intention of
selling them to criminals (Remarks).
The first of these new proposals is the requirement of universal background checks for anyone who
wants to purchase a firearm. This will hopefully close some loopholes in the National Instant
Criminal Background Check System and prevent criminals and people with a history of mental
illness from obtaining firearms (Remarks). As the background check system stands now, people
who buy guns from gun shows and other unlicensed sellers do not have to complete a background
check (Stopping). For the Columbine massacre on April 20th, 1999, the killers purchased their
guns at a gun show from an unlicensed seller, so no background check was performed. On April
16th, 2007 was the shooting at Virginia Tech and this shooter obtained a gun from a licensed gun
dealer which he should have been prohibited from buying. He was able to purchase this weapon
because his records were never reported to the FBI's gun background check system. Again in
Tucson on January 8th, 2001, a killer acted with guns he should have been prohibited from buying
because his records also were not in the database. These considerable loopholes in our current

There should be a strict gun control law in the United States to regulate gun holders and eliminate
the misuse of gun and gun violence. It is necessary for the American people to be more careful with
all the firearms due to the result of many gun death whether it's an accident or on purpose.
In the 2nd Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being
necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be
infringed." Such language has created considerable debate regarding the Amendment's intended
scope. This inalienable right should belong to our people as the power to protect themselves.
Keeping this right also shows the respect to our nation's spirit of freedom and liberty of us as...show
more content...
People in the past had to protect themselves from wild, ferocious animal and their enemies; those
were no longer a threat to us. Current society needs to modify the law to adjust current society
better and increase the applicable area of law to cover. The law is the best weapon to protect and
defend yourself, and that's why we need to improve the law with the progress of our society.
Different periods have different problems; we should make the law more flexible to applied, and
gun control is one problem we are focusing right now.
For recent years in America, word "gun violence" and "gun control" were brought up more
frequently, we reevaluate and reconsider the safety of gun and the actual use of it. Gun holder
was asked to put the gun into gun cabinets because it's easy for kids to get and find out how to use
it without any safety instruction. It's horrible to hear a kid knows how to use a gun before he
knows how to read. Kids are not the only thing we should be worried about; many adults are
incorrectly using it as well, there are more than 78 injuries and death that was caused by firearms
every single day over the

Gun control
In the U.S. more than 30,000 people are killed by firearms each year, you can say that we need
stricter gun laws. Who should we blame for all of the shootings in America? We should blame the
people who pull the trigger, the people who sell the guns, and our government. Gun control is one of
the biggest debates because everyone has their own strong opinions. If the U.S. had better gun
control laws, then there wouldn't be any gun violence issues. The government can't figure out what
to do about the gun violence debate. Twice in the last two years the gun problem has reached the
nation's highest court. The main reason is the 2nd amendment. People simply won't give away their
firearms because they have the right to bear arms and that...show more content...
These are innocent children and teachers that are being killed by lunatics carrying a gun. Adam
Lanza was the shooter in the Sandy Hook shooting that killed twelve students, six school employees,
and his mother. Adam had many untreated disorders such as anxiety, excessive–compulsive disorder,
anorexia, and aspergers. This proves that if we had stronger background checks this may never have
happened. The gun sellers simply don't care about who is buying their guns, all they care about is
making money. Adam was also using an AR–15 which is an assault weapon that should be outlawed
for civilians. James Holmes was responsible for the mass movie theater shooting in Aurora,
Colorado. This shooting killed 12 people and injured 70 others. Experts say the reason why James
shot up the movie theater was because he had an untreated schizophrenia disorder. In these two
incidences the killers were able to get guns, even though they were mentally ill. They were guilty of
the crimes, but sometimes our Judicial System will find them innocent for reasons of insanity and
may eventually be let back into society. The senseless shootings might all be prevented with more
thorough background

Gun Control For many years the controversial topic of gun control has sparked countless
passionate debates. The arguments posed in these debates vary widely concerning the possible
solutions to solving the problem of violent crime due to the possession of firearms. This paper
introduces three different views concerning gun control. The first illustrates the freedom to own
firearms. The second view advocates the complete restriction of firearms owned by citizens, and
the last one presents a modified freedom of possessing firearms. Each faction seeks to have its
position supported by national legislation. One of the big supporters of owning firearms is The
Future of Freedom Foundation, known as FFF, who wants the absolute right to own any weapon.
Their reasoning is that people in America can only protect themselves from stronger dangers if
they own firearms. They point out that weak people like women on the street can defend
themselves against an attacker, and fewer hostage situations would happen when people in
America can carry guns with them. People of FFF freely say that more guns equals less crime,
and that in some of the states where gun ownership is not highly controlled, lower crime rate is
experienced. (Benedict D. LaRosa, October, 2002) Their argument is that after the government
passed a gun control act in 1968, the crime rate climbed up in robbery cases from 138,000 in 1965
to 376,000 in 1972, while murders with guns increased from 5,015 to 10,379 in the same period
according to the Census Bureau. They cite an example about New York, where the restrictions on
guns are strong; the crime rate is higher than in Vermont, where gun controls are low. Also, they
state where gun control is strictly enforced, illegal gun ownership is much higher. By allowing
guns for citizens, the crime rate will decrease. They also considered this an economical solution for
protection. (Benedict D. LaRosa) They support multiple gun ownership for each person so they can
be safe on the street, in the office and even at home. They say gun control interferes with the right to
protect yourself and your family. They attack the government by saying that the right to own
firearms is being taken away slowly from citizens, and

Many of you think that gun control is a good thing, but how good can such an idea really be? The
people who know me are well aware that I am a right wing conservative republican and have been
for quite some time. I didn't always have this political stance. Before I began recreational studies in
policy, I was a democrat, and at the time I did not know what being a democrat stood for. All I knew
was that I should support the democratic party and not the republican party. This opinion changed
when I began to actually study politics. My stance on gun control became in line with the beliefs of
many conservative figures which is less government control and resultingly more individual
freedoms. To achieve this goal of less government and more freedom, we must look at facts. The
facts I would like to go over with you prove that gun control is ineffective because of examples of
bad gun legislation, the intentions of the second amendment, and the true interpretation of the
second amendment. (Intro paragraph=Ethos)
Gun control is an argument that is being readily discussed.. This is because of facts which
ultimately disprove gun fallacies generated by pro gun control advocates. "Facts are stubborn
things" John Adams once said. 72% of homicides by firearms in 2012 were committed with a
handgun. (logos) These statistics from the FBI renders the popular myth that "assault weapons" are
a problem in the U.S. this is false and Despite this fact, our ex–president, Barack Obama, in 2013
wanted to push a piece of legislation called the Assault Weapons Ban of 2013 that would of
completely halted the importation of "assault weapons." (logos)
You might say, "Who needs afirearm?" Someone looking for a gun to protect themselves and their
loved ones in their home or someone like my friend's dad who is a gun junky wanting one for
target practice. I also say, patriots still aware of the purposes of the second amendment. Those who
have not failed to recognize one of the greater meanings of our individual right to keep and bear
arms. Self preservation. Lets define self preservation in relation to my point. One's preservation of
him/her self from the threat of harm from evil doers and/or a tyrannical government. Average
Americans have

Argumentative Essays On Gun Control

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Essay Help .

More from Essay Help . (13)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Argumentative Essays On Gun Control