SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 6
Download to read offline
Rating Action: Moody's assigns first-time Baa2/P-2 ratings to Bank of Ningbo;
outlook stable
Global Credit Research - 08 Dec 2014
Hong Kong, December 08, 2014 -- Moody's Investors Service has assigned first-time Baa2 long-term and P-2
short-term deposit ratings to Bank of Ningbo Co Ltd.
The Baa2/P-2 long-term and short-term deposit ratings reflect the bank's baseline credit assessment (BCA) of ba1
— which is equivalent to a bank financial strength rating of D+ — and a two-notch uplift based on Moody's
assumption of a high likelihood of systemic support for the bank, given the bank's importance to Ningbo city's
economy.
The ratings outlook is stable.
RATINGS RATIONALE
Bank of Ningbo is a city commercial bank. Its operations are mainly concentrated in Zhejiang Province's Ningbo
city, as well as the rest of the province.
At end-2013, while the bank's market share of system deposits totaled 0.24%, its share of deposits in Zhejiang
Province and Ningbo city totaled 2% and 10% respectively. In terms of total assets, Bank of Ningbo is the fourth-
largest city commercial bank in China.
The bank's BCA of ba1 reflects its: (1) strong franchise in small and medium enterprise (SME) lending, especially
in Zhejiang Province; (2) good track record in maintaining stable asset quality; and (3) adequate capital buffers.
However, the BCA is constrained by: (1) potential asset quality deterioration, due to the economic slowdown in
China; (2) high geographic concentration in the Yangtze River Delta (Zhejiang province, Jiangsu province and
Shanghai); and (3) increasing margin pressure, due to higher funding costs.
Bank of Ningbo was established in 1997, and has established a track record of offering SME banking services in
Zhejiang Province.
The bank cooperates closely in several of its business areas with its strategic shareholder, Oversea-Chinese
Banking Corp Ltd (OCBC, Aa1/P-1/aa3) which owns a 20% shareholding in Bank of Ningbo. As OCBC's
traditional strength is in the consumer and SME segments, Bank of Ningbo could benefit from the strategic
corporation with OCBC in its SME and micro and small enterprise businesses.
The bank has developed a unique risk management system for its SME loans. It has also demonstrated a good
track record of maintaining stable asset quality over the past 10 years. It reported a non-performing loan (NPL)
ratio of 0.89% at end-September 2014, a level unchanged from that reported at end-2013. By contrast, system
NPLs rose to 1.16% from 1.00% over the same period.
Bank of Ningbo's capital adequacy is also strong. Its, Tier 1 and capital adequacy ratios under the new Basel III
standard rose to 10.01% and 12.16% respectively at end-September 2014 from 9.35% and 12.06% at end-2013.
These levels well exceed the regulatory requirement of 8.5% and 10.5% for non-systemically important banks in
China by the end of 2018.
The bank's relatively strong capital adequacy was mainly due to its: 1) strong net profit, which rose 16% year-on-
year in the first nine months of 2014; and 2) a private placement in September 2014, which raised an additional
RMB3.1 billion in net capital.
Because the bank focuses on providing lending to SMEs in the Yangtze River Delta, Moody's expects that Bank
of Ningbo's asset quality will continue to face pressure, given that businesses in the delta region are more
sensitive to China's economic slowdown. The bank's special mention loans rose 63% in the first nine months of
2014 to RMB2.95 billion.
Nevertheless, Bank of Ningbo's strong profitability, loan loss reserves and strengthened capital position could
mitigate the effects of any deteriorating credit quality of businesses in the Yangtze River Delta.
The bank is heavily reliant on net interest income, which accounted for 87% of its operating income in 1H 2014. Its
reported net interest margin (NIM) in 1H 2014 was 2.52%, down from 3.05% in 2013, mainly due to its change in
asset allocation. The bank has increased its proportion of wealth management product and asset management
product investments; such holdings exhibit lower yields and spreads than loans.
Moody's expects Bank of Ningbo's NIM to be pressured by the asymmetrical rate cuts and the lifting of the deposit
rate ceiling to 1.2x of the official benchmarks from 1.1x in China announced on 21 November 2014.
Bank of Ningbo's deposit rating of Baa2 incorporates a two-notch uplift, due to Moody's assessment of a high
likelihood of systemic support for the bank from the government.
While the bank's market share in China is limited, its operations are important to Ningbo's economy, as seen by its
10% share of deposits in the city. Given that Ningbo is one of five centrally planned cities in China, and Bank of
Ningbo is the largest city commercial bank in Ningbo, Moody's expects there will be government support for the
bank in times of distress.
Bank of Ningbo is 20% owned by Ningbo Development & Investment Group Co. Ltd. (unrated), which in turn is
100% owned by the Ningbo government. Because some 1.4% of Bank of Ningbo's shares are owned by a state-
owned enterprise, the Ningbo government effectively owns 21.4% of Bank of Ningbo.
What Could Change the Rating -- Up
An upgrade of Bank of Ningbo's ratings would require the bank to demonstrate its ability to maintain its current
financial position during economic slowdowns.
Its ratings could face upward pressure if: (1) the bank maintains its NPL ratio at around 1%, without a significant
deterioration in its profitability levels and capital position over the next 1-2 years; and (2) the bank gradually
improves its geographic concentration, reducing loans and deposits in Zhejiang Province to less than 40% of total
loans and deposits.
What Could Change the Rating -- Down
Because the bank's deposit ratings incorporate a two-notch uplift based on Moody's expectation of a high
likelihood of government support, any indication of a weakening in government support would be negative for the
ratings.
The bank's ratings could face downward pressure if: (1) its NPL ratio exceeds 2.5%; (2) its Tier 1 ratio falls below
8.5% due to a deterioration in asset quality, and/or rapid asset growth; or (3) keen competition hampers its SME
franchise and profitability profile.
The principal methodology used in this rating was Global Banks published in July 2014. Please see the Credit
Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.
Bank of Ningbo Co Ltd is headquartered in Ningbo city. The bank reported assets totaling RMB537.9 billion
(approximately $86.8 billion) at end-September 2014.
REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides certain regulatory
disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class
of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance
with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain
regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating
action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings,
this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in
relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where
the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner
that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for
the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit support from the primary entity(ies) of this rating
action, and whose ratings may change as a result of this rating action, the associated regulatory disclosures will
be those of the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures, if applicable to
jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.
Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating
outlook or rating review.
Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal
entity that has issued the rating.
Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for
each credit rating.
The first name below is the lead rating analyst for this Credit Rating and the last name below is the person
primarily responsible for approving this Credit Rating.
Sean Hung
Asst Vice President - Analyst
Financial Institutions Group
Moody's Investors Service Hong Kong Ltd.
24/F One Pacific Place
88 Queensway
Hong Kong
China (Hong Kong S.A.R.)
JOURNALISTS: (852) 3758 -1350
SUBSCRIBERS: (852) 3551-3077
Stephen Long
MD - Financial Institutions
Financial Institutions Group
JOURNALISTS: (852) 3758 -1350
SUBSCRIBERS: (852) 3551-3077
Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service Hong Kong Ltd.
24/F One Pacific Place
88 Queensway
Hong Kong
China (Hong Kong S.A.R.)
JOURNALISTS: (852) 3758 -1350
SUBSCRIBERS: (852) 3551-3077
© 2015 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and
affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.
CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES
(“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES,
CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND
RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S (“MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS”) MAY INCLUDE
MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT
COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK
THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE
AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT
ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE
RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S
PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S
PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK
AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT
RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR
FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT
PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER
CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN
INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND
PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH
INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY
THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.
.
MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL
INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO CONSIDER MOODY’S CREDIT
RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS IN MAKING ANY INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU
SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE
REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED,DISSEMINATED,
REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN
WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON
WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable.
Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained
herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the
information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be
reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and
cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing
the Moody’s Publications.
.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors
and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for arising from or in connection with the information contained
herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers,
employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses
or damages, including but not limited to: (a(b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is
not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors
and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity,
including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability
that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the
control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers,
arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such
information.
NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER
OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER
WHATSOEVER.
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”),
hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes
and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of
any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees
ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address
the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist
between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also
publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at
www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder
Affiliation Policy.”
For Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services
License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or
Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended
to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By
continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are
accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you
represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of
section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a
debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to
retail clients. It would be dangerous for “retail clients” to make any investment decision based on MOODY’S credit
rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.
For Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group
Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO.
Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a
Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are
Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and,
consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ
are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are
FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.
MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and
municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as
applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal
and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000.
MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.

More Related Content

What's hot

Non Performing Assets (NPA)
Non Performing Assets (NPA)Non Performing Assets (NPA)
Non Performing Assets (NPA)Sanchit
 
Comparative Analysis of NPA in Public, Private & in Private Sector Banks.
Comparative Analysis of NPA in Public, Private & in Private Sector Banks.Comparative Analysis of NPA in Public, Private & in Private Sector Banks.
Comparative Analysis of NPA in Public, Private & in Private Sector Banks.Rajath Kunder
 
An empirical analysis on asset quality of public sector banks in india non p...
An empirical analysis on asset quality of public sector banks in india non  p...An empirical analysis on asset quality of public sector banks in india non  p...
An empirical analysis on asset quality of public sector banks in india non p...chelliah paramasivan
 
Non Performing Assets - Banks
Non Performing Assets - BanksNon Performing Assets - Banks
Non Performing Assets - Banksraj raisinghani
 
Non performing assets
Non performing assetsNon performing assets
Non performing assetsKrishna Kanth
 
Issues with banking sector in india
Issues with banking sector in indiaIssues with banking sector in india
Issues with banking sector in indiaHarshit Aggarwal
 
BancABC: 2013 Report
BancABC: 2013 ReportBancABC: 2013 Report
BancABC: 2013 Reportwgjlubbe
 
634811582135210678 (1)
634811582135210678 (1)634811582135210678 (1)
634811582135210678 (1)videoaakash15
 
Questionnaire on npa
Questionnaire on npaQuestionnaire on npa
Questionnaire on npavandivarun
 
Non performing assets
Non performing assetsNon performing assets
Non performing assetsnikkythomas8
 
Different type of rate Controlled by RBI
Different type of rate Controlled by RBIDifferent type of rate Controlled by RBI
Different type of rate Controlled by RBIChandan Singh
 
MENA Weekly - May 14 2017
MENA Weekly -  May 14 2017MENA Weekly -  May 14 2017
MENA Weekly - May 14 2017Jean-Paul Pigat
 
Increasing NPA In PSU Banks And Its Management
Increasing NPA  In PSU Banks And Its Management Increasing NPA  In PSU Banks And Its Management
Increasing NPA In PSU Banks And Its Management Amit Sharma
 

What's hot (20)

634891048388871123
634891048388871123634891048388871123
634891048388871123
 
Non Performing Assets (NPA)
Non Performing Assets (NPA)Non Performing Assets (NPA)
Non Performing Assets (NPA)
 
Comparative Analysis of NPA in Public, Private & in Private Sector Banks.
Comparative Analysis of NPA in Public, Private & in Private Sector Banks.Comparative Analysis of NPA in Public, Private & in Private Sector Banks.
Comparative Analysis of NPA in Public, Private & in Private Sector Banks.
 
An empirical analysis on asset quality of public sector banks in india non p...
An empirical analysis on asset quality of public sector banks in india non  p...An empirical analysis on asset quality of public sector banks in india non  p...
An empirical analysis on asset quality of public sector banks in india non p...
 
634747546547583299
634747546547583299634747546547583299
634747546547583299
 
Non Performing Assets - Banks
Non Performing Assets - BanksNon Performing Assets - Banks
Non Performing Assets - Banks
 
Npa mgt
Npa mgtNpa mgt
Npa mgt
 
Non performing assets
Non performing assetsNon performing assets
Non performing assets
 
Issues with banking sector in india
Issues with banking sector in indiaIssues with banking sector in india
Issues with banking sector in india
 
Npa 18
Npa 18Npa 18
Npa 18
 
Npa chapter 2
Npa chapter 2Npa chapter 2
Npa chapter 2
 
Npa
NpaNpa
Npa
 
Non Performing Asset (NPA)
Non Performing Asset (NPA)Non Performing Asset (NPA)
Non Performing Asset (NPA)
 
BancABC: 2013 Report
BancABC: 2013 ReportBancABC: 2013 Report
BancABC: 2013 Report
 
634811582135210678 (1)
634811582135210678 (1)634811582135210678 (1)
634811582135210678 (1)
 
Questionnaire on npa
Questionnaire on npaQuestionnaire on npa
Questionnaire on npa
 
Non performing assets
Non performing assetsNon performing assets
Non performing assets
 
Different type of rate Controlled by RBI
Different type of rate Controlled by RBIDifferent type of rate Controlled by RBI
Different type of rate Controlled by RBI
 
MENA Weekly - May 14 2017
MENA Weekly -  May 14 2017MENA Weekly -  May 14 2017
MENA Weekly - May 14 2017
 
Increasing NPA In PSU Banks And Its Management
Increasing NPA  In PSU Banks And Its Management Increasing NPA  In PSU Banks And Its Management
Increasing NPA In PSU Banks And Its Management
 

Viewers also liked

Running faster to stand still
Running faster to stand stillRunning faster to stand still
Running faster to stand stillbelligerentdate74
 
DWelski_Intelligent Immigration Reform
DWelski_Intelligent Immigration ReformDWelski_Intelligent Immigration Reform
DWelski_Intelligent Immigration ReformDerek M. Welski
 
Nathan Latusekpublic cv
Nathan Latusekpublic cv Nathan Latusekpublic cv
Nathan Latusekpublic cv nathan latusek
 
Bully zone slideshow 1
Bully zone slideshow 1Bully zone slideshow 1
Bully zone slideshow 1TheBullyZone
 
"Nature and Society" syllabus
"Nature and Society" syllabus"Nature and Society" syllabus
"Nature and Society" syllabusteperkins
 
Research Paper and Student Conference Sequence - Assignment Prompts
Research Paper and Student Conference Sequence - Assignment PromptsResearch Paper and Student Conference Sequence - Assignment Prompts
Research Paper and Student Conference Sequence - Assignment Promptsteperkins
 
How to write award winning entries for architects & designers
How to write award winning entries for architects & designersHow to write award winning entries for architects & designers
How to write award winning entries for architects & designersVerity Campbell
 
Yeoman(모던웹 개발을 위한 관리도구)설치사용가이드
Yeoman(모던웹 개발을 위한 관리도구)설치사용가이드Yeoman(모던웹 개발을 위한 관리도구)설치사용가이드
Yeoman(모던웹 개발을 위한 관리도구)설치사용가이드수정 김
 
WW2 Presentation Zac,Jordan,Thomas
WW2 Presentation Zac,Jordan,ThomasWW2 Presentation Zac,Jordan,Thomas
WW2 Presentation Zac,Jordan,ThomasDrigono
 
Syllabus - Making California
Syllabus - Making CaliforniaSyllabus - Making California
Syllabus - Making Californiateperkins
 

Viewers also liked (11)

Running faster to stand still
Running faster to stand stillRunning faster to stand still
Running faster to stand still
 
DWelski_Intelligent Immigration Reform
DWelski_Intelligent Immigration ReformDWelski_Intelligent Immigration Reform
DWelski_Intelligent Immigration Reform
 
Mapas
MapasMapas
Mapas
 
Nathan Latusekpublic cv
Nathan Latusekpublic cv Nathan Latusekpublic cv
Nathan Latusekpublic cv
 
Bully zone slideshow 1
Bully zone slideshow 1Bully zone slideshow 1
Bully zone slideshow 1
 
"Nature and Society" syllabus
"Nature and Society" syllabus"Nature and Society" syllabus
"Nature and Society" syllabus
 
Research Paper and Student Conference Sequence - Assignment Prompts
Research Paper and Student Conference Sequence - Assignment PromptsResearch Paper and Student Conference Sequence - Assignment Prompts
Research Paper and Student Conference Sequence - Assignment Prompts
 
How to write award winning entries for architects & designers
How to write award winning entries for architects & designersHow to write award winning entries for architects & designers
How to write award winning entries for architects & designers
 
Yeoman(모던웹 개발을 위한 관리도구)설치사용가이드
Yeoman(모던웹 개발을 위한 관리도구)설치사용가이드Yeoman(모던웹 개발을 위한 관리도구)설치사용가이드
Yeoman(모던웹 개발을 위한 관리도구)설치사용가이드
 
WW2 Presentation Zac,Jordan,Thomas
WW2 Presentation Zac,Jordan,ThomasWW2 Presentation Zac,Jordan,Thomas
WW2 Presentation Zac,Jordan,Thomas
 
Syllabus - Making California
Syllabus - Making CaliforniaSyllabus - Making California
Syllabus - Making California
 

Similar to Moody's - Bank of Ningbo

Moody's downgrades Noble Group to Ba1; outlook negative
Moody's downgrades Noble Group to Ba1;  outlook negativeMoody's downgrades Noble Group to Ba1;  outlook negative
Moody's downgrades Noble Group to Ba1; outlook negativeGE 94
 
Noble Group Moody's Global Credit Research Rating action
Noble Group Moody's Global Credit Research Rating action Noble Group Moody's Global Credit Research Rating action
Noble Group Moody's Global Credit Research Rating action GE 94
 
SBI Corporate Bond Fund: An Income Mutual Fund Scheme - Aug 16
SBI Corporate Bond Fund: An Income Mutual Fund Scheme - Aug 16SBI Corporate Bond Fund: An Income Mutual Fund Scheme - Aug 16
SBI Corporate Bond Fund: An Income Mutual Fund Scheme - Aug 16SBI Mutual Fund
 
Npa management (finance project)
Npa management (finance project)Npa management (finance project)
Npa management (finance project)Suyash Prakash
 
Indian Banking entering the new era of Basil III and Financial Inclusion
Indian Banking entering the new era of Basil III and Financial InclusionIndian Banking entering the new era of Basil III and Financial Inclusion
Indian Banking entering the new era of Basil III and Financial InclusionAnmol Narang
 
PBBANK – Fundamental Analysis FY15
PBBANK – Fundamental Analysis FY15PBBANK – Fundamental Analysis FY15
PBBANK – Fundamental Analysis FY15lcchong76
 
Noble group downgraded to 'bb+' on weakened liquidity; s&p global credit ...
Noble group downgraded to 'bb+' on weakened liquidity; s&p global credit ...Noble group downgraded to 'bb+' on weakened liquidity; s&p global credit ...
Noble group downgraded to 'bb+' on weakened liquidity; s&p global credit ...GE 94
 
Analysis of the Efficiency of NBFCs
Analysis of the Efficiency of NBFCsAnalysis of the Efficiency of NBFCs
Analysis of the Efficiency of NBFCsVasudha Ruhela
 
NBK Investor Presentation - May 2022.pdf
NBK Investor Presentation - May 2022.pdfNBK Investor Presentation - May 2022.pdf
NBK Investor Presentation - May 2022.pdfFarihaAmin7
 
Weekly news 6 to 10 sept
Weekly news 6 to 10 septWeekly news 6 to 10 sept
Weekly news 6 to 10 septNavneet Malhi
 
October 2015 Fitch Rating Bank of Astana B with Stable outlook Press release
October 2015 Fitch Rating Bank of Astana B with Stable outlook Press releaseOctober 2015 Fitch Rating Bank of Astana B with Stable outlook Press release
October 2015 Fitch Rating Bank of Astana B with Stable outlook Press releaseAlexander Chagoubat Millin
 
Analysis of the Efficiency of NBFCs
Analysis of the Efficiency of NBFCsAnalysis of the Efficiency of NBFCs
Analysis of the Efficiency of NBFCsVasudha Ruhela
 
Burning desires ipo outlook rbl bank
Burning desires ipo outlook rbl bankBurning desires ipo outlook rbl bank
Burning desires ipo outlook rbl bankBurning Desires
 
August 2015 S&P Rating upgrade Bank of Astana English
August 2015 S&P Rating upgrade Bank of Astana EnglishAugust 2015 S&P Rating upgrade Bank of Astana English
August 2015 S&P Rating upgrade Bank of Astana EnglishAlexander Chagoubat Millin
 
PBBANK – Fundamental Analysis FY14
PBBANK – Fundamental Analysis FY14PBBANK – Fundamental Analysis FY14
PBBANK – Fundamental Analysis FY14lcchong76
 

Similar to Moody's - Bank of Ningbo (20)

Moody's downgrades Noble Group to Ba1; outlook negative
Moody's downgrades Noble Group to Ba1;  outlook negativeMoody's downgrades Noble Group to Ba1;  outlook negative
Moody's downgrades Noble Group to Ba1; outlook negative
 
Noble Group Moody's Global Credit Research Rating action
Noble Group Moody's Global Credit Research Rating action Noble Group Moody's Global Credit Research Rating action
Noble Group Moody's Global Credit Research Rating action
 
Final report for submission
Final report for submissionFinal report for submission
Final report for submission
 
Credit discipline
Credit disciplineCredit discipline
Credit discipline
 
SBI Corporate Bond Fund: An Income Mutual Fund Scheme - Aug 16
SBI Corporate Bond Fund: An Income Mutual Fund Scheme - Aug 16SBI Corporate Bond Fund: An Income Mutual Fund Scheme - Aug 16
SBI Corporate Bond Fund: An Income Mutual Fund Scheme - Aug 16
 
Npa management (finance project)
Npa management (finance project)Npa management (finance project)
Npa management (finance project)
 
Indian Banking entering the new era of Basil III and Financial Inclusion
Indian Banking entering the new era of Basil III and Financial InclusionIndian Banking entering the new era of Basil III and Financial Inclusion
Indian Banking entering the new era of Basil III and Financial Inclusion
 
PBBANK – Fundamental Analysis FY15
PBBANK – Fundamental Analysis FY15PBBANK – Fundamental Analysis FY15
PBBANK – Fundamental Analysis FY15
 
Noble group downgraded to 'bb+' on weakened liquidity; s&p global credit ...
Noble group downgraded to 'bb+' on weakened liquidity; s&p global credit ...Noble group downgraded to 'bb+' on weakened liquidity; s&p global credit ...
Noble group downgraded to 'bb+' on weakened liquidity; s&p global credit ...
 
Analysis of the Efficiency of NBFCs
Analysis of the Efficiency of NBFCsAnalysis of the Efficiency of NBFCs
Analysis of the Efficiency of NBFCs
 
NBK Investor Presentation - May 2022.pdf
NBK Investor Presentation - May 2022.pdfNBK Investor Presentation - May 2022.pdf
NBK Investor Presentation - May 2022.pdf
 
Weekly news 6 to 10 sept
Weekly news 6 to 10 septWeekly news 6 to 10 sept
Weekly news 6 to 10 sept
 
October 2015 Fitch Rating Bank of Astana B with Stable outlook Press release
October 2015 Fitch Rating Bank of Astana B with Stable outlook Press releaseOctober 2015 Fitch Rating Bank of Astana B with Stable outlook Press release
October 2015 Fitch Rating Bank of Astana B with Stable outlook Press release
 
Analysis of the Efficiency of NBFCs
Analysis of the Efficiency of NBFCsAnalysis of the Efficiency of NBFCs
Analysis of the Efficiency of NBFCs
 
Burning desires ipo outlook rbl bank
Burning desires ipo outlook rbl bankBurning desires ipo outlook rbl bank
Burning desires ipo outlook rbl bank
 
August 2015 S&P Rating upgrade Bank of Astana English
August 2015 S&P Rating upgrade Bank of Astana EnglishAugust 2015 S&P Rating upgrade Bank of Astana English
August 2015 S&P Rating upgrade Bank of Astana English
 
Economic Capsule - May 2014
Economic Capsule - May 2014Economic Capsule - May 2014
Economic Capsule - May 2014
 
combank_economic_capsule_july
combank_economic_capsule_julycombank_economic_capsule_july
combank_economic_capsule_july
 
PBBANK – Fundamental Analysis FY14
PBBANK – Fundamental Analysis FY14PBBANK – Fundamental Analysis FY14
PBBANK – Fundamental Analysis FY14
 
Sawad memo
Sawad memoSawad memo
Sawad memo
 

Moody's - Bank of Ningbo

  • 1. Rating Action: Moody's assigns first-time Baa2/P-2 ratings to Bank of Ningbo; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 08 Dec 2014 Hong Kong, December 08, 2014 -- Moody's Investors Service has assigned first-time Baa2 long-term and P-2 short-term deposit ratings to Bank of Ningbo Co Ltd. The Baa2/P-2 long-term and short-term deposit ratings reflect the bank's baseline credit assessment (BCA) of ba1 — which is equivalent to a bank financial strength rating of D+ — and a two-notch uplift based on Moody's assumption of a high likelihood of systemic support for the bank, given the bank's importance to Ningbo city's economy. The ratings outlook is stable. RATINGS RATIONALE Bank of Ningbo is a city commercial bank. Its operations are mainly concentrated in Zhejiang Province's Ningbo city, as well as the rest of the province. At end-2013, while the bank's market share of system deposits totaled 0.24%, its share of deposits in Zhejiang Province and Ningbo city totaled 2% and 10% respectively. In terms of total assets, Bank of Ningbo is the fourth- largest city commercial bank in China. The bank's BCA of ba1 reflects its: (1) strong franchise in small and medium enterprise (SME) lending, especially in Zhejiang Province; (2) good track record in maintaining stable asset quality; and (3) adequate capital buffers. However, the BCA is constrained by: (1) potential asset quality deterioration, due to the economic slowdown in China; (2) high geographic concentration in the Yangtze River Delta (Zhejiang province, Jiangsu province and Shanghai); and (3) increasing margin pressure, due to higher funding costs. Bank of Ningbo was established in 1997, and has established a track record of offering SME banking services in Zhejiang Province. The bank cooperates closely in several of its business areas with its strategic shareholder, Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd (OCBC, Aa1/P-1/aa3) which owns a 20% shareholding in Bank of Ningbo. As OCBC's traditional strength is in the consumer and SME segments, Bank of Ningbo could benefit from the strategic corporation with OCBC in its SME and micro and small enterprise businesses. The bank has developed a unique risk management system for its SME loans. It has also demonstrated a good track record of maintaining stable asset quality over the past 10 years. It reported a non-performing loan (NPL) ratio of 0.89% at end-September 2014, a level unchanged from that reported at end-2013. By contrast, system NPLs rose to 1.16% from 1.00% over the same period. Bank of Ningbo's capital adequacy is also strong. Its, Tier 1 and capital adequacy ratios under the new Basel III standard rose to 10.01% and 12.16% respectively at end-September 2014 from 9.35% and 12.06% at end-2013. These levels well exceed the regulatory requirement of 8.5% and 10.5% for non-systemically important banks in China by the end of 2018. The bank's relatively strong capital adequacy was mainly due to its: 1) strong net profit, which rose 16% year-on- year in the first nine months of 2014; and 2) a private placement in September 2014, which raised an additional RMB3.1 billion in net capital. Because the bank focuses on providing lending to SMEs in the Yangtze River Delta, Moody's expects that Bank of Ningbo's asset quality will continue to face pressure, given that businesses in the delta region are more sensitive to China's economic slowdown. The bank's special mention loans rose 63% in the first nine months of 2014 to RMB2.95 billion.
  • 2. Nevertheless, Bank of Ningbo's strong profitability, loan loss reserves and strengthened capital position could mitigate the effects of any deteriorating credit quality of businesses in the Yangtze River Delta. The bank is heavily reliant on net interest income, which accounted for 87% of its operating income in 1H 2014. Its reported net interest margin (NIM) in 1H 2014 was 2.52%, down from 3.05% in 2013, mainly due to its change in asset allocation. The bank has increased its proportion of wealth management product and asset management product investments; such holdings exhibit lower yields and spreads than loans. Moody's expects Bank of Ningbo's NIM to be pressured by the asymmetrical rate cuts and the lifting of the deposit rate ceiling to 1.2x of the official benchmarks from 1.1x in China announced on 21 November 2014. Bank of Ningbo's deposit rating of Baa2 incorporates a two-notch uplift, due to Moody's assessment of a high likelihood of systemic support for the bank from the government. While the bank's market share in China is limited, its operations are important to Ningbo's economy, as seen by its 10% share of deposits in the city. Given that Ningbo is one of five centrally planned cities in China, and Bank of Ningbo is the largest city commercial bank in Ningbo, Moody's expects there will be government support for the bank in times of distress. Bank of Ningbo is 20% owned by Ningbo Development & Investment Group Co. Ltd. (unrated), which in turn is 100% owned by the Ningbo government. Because some 1.4% of Bank of Ningbo's shares are owned by a state- owned enterprise, the Ningbo government effectively owns 21.4% of Bank of Ningbo. What Could Change the Rating -- Up An upgrade of Bank of Ningbo's ratings would require the bank to demonstrate its ability to maintain its current financial position during economic slowdowns. Its ratings could face upward pressure if: (1) the bank maintains its NPL ratio at around 1%, without a significant deterioration in its profitability levels and capital position over the next 1-2 years; and (2) the bank gradually improves its geographic concentration, reducing loans and deposits in Zhejiang Province to less than 40% of total loans and deposits. What Could Change the Rating -- Down Because the bank's deposit ratings incorporate a two-notch uplift based on Moody's expectation of a high likelihood of government support, any indication of a weakening in government support would be negative for the ratings. The bank's ratings could face downward pressure if: (1) its NPL ratio exceeds 2.5%; (2) its Tier 1 ratio falls below 8.5% due to a deterioration in asset quality, and/or rapid asset growth; or (3) keen competition hampers its SME franchise and profitability profile. The principal methodology used in this rating was Global Banks published in July 2014. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology. Bank of Ningbo Co Ltd is headquartered in Ningbo city. The bank reported assets totaling RMB537.9 billion (approximately $86.8 billion) at end-September 2014. REGULATORY DISCLOSURES For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
  • 3. For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit support from the primary entity(ies) of this rating action, and whose ratings may change as a result of this rating action, the associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures, if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity. Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review. Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating. Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating. The first name below is the lead rating analyst for this Credit Rating and the last name below is the person primarily responsible for approving this Credit Rating. Sean Hung Asst Vice President - Analyst Financial Institutions Group Moody's Investors Service Hong Kong Ltd. 24/F One Pacific Place 88 Queensway Hong Kong China (Hong Kong S.A.R.) JOURNALISTS: (852) 3758 -1350 SUBSCRIBERS: (852) 3551-3077 Stephen Long MD - Financial Institutions Financial Institutions Group JOURNALISTS: (852) 3758 -1350 SUBSCRIBERS: (852) 3551-3077 Releasing Office: Moody's Investors Service Hong Kong Ltd. 24/F One Pacific Place 88 Queensway Hong Kong China (Hong Kong S.A.R.) JOURNALISTS: (852) 3758 -1350 SUBSCRIBERS: (852) 3551-3077 © 2015 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S (“MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS”) MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK
  • 4. THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. . MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO CONSIDER MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS IN MAKING ANY INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED,DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s Publications. . To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a(b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.
  • 5. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.” For Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail clients. It would be dangerous for “retail clients” to make any investment decision based on MOODY’S credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser. For Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively. MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000.
  • 6. MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.