1. 2017 EDELMAN EARNED BRAND STUDY
BEYOND NO
BRAND’S LAND
J U N E 2 0 1 7

2. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
THE WORLD WANTS MORE FROM BRANDS
2
Sources:
12017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q672-675, 678-680, 688-690. For details on how the “system failing” measure was calculated, please refer to the Technical Appendix.
22017 Edelman Earned Brand study. Q17. Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following statements. (Top 4 Box, Agree.) 14-country global total.
53%
2017 EDELMAN TRUST BAROMETER 2017 EDELMAN EARNED BRAND
51%“The system is
failing me.”1
Believe brands can do
more to solve social
ills than government.2
SINCE I DO NOT TRUST INSTITUTIONS
TO STAND UP FOR ME…
…I EXPECT BRANDS TO
STAND WITH ME.

3. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D 3
BRANDS ARE TRYING
TO ANSWER THE CALL

4. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
THERE IS A LOT AT STAKE FOR THE
CONSUMER-BRAND RELATIONSHIP
4
BUYING
LOYALTY
ADVOCACY
DEFENSE
SOME GAIN SOME LOSE

5. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
2017 EDELMAN EARNED BRAND STUDY
5
14,000
RESPONDENTS
1,000 per country,
nationally representative
of age, gender, and region
based on most recent
country census data.
14
COUNTRIES
Online survey in Australia,
Brazil, Canada, China,
France, Germany, India,
Japan, Mexico, The
Netherlands, Singapore,
UAE, U.K., and the U.S.
SURVEY
TIMING
March 31 –
April 24, 2017
THE EDELMAN BRAND
RELATIONSHIP INDEX
Measures the strength
of the relationship consumers
have with the favorite brand
they buy across 7
dimensions. Measures
relationships across 18 brand
categories.
SOCIAL
LISTENING
We listened to consumer
conversations on social
media to understand the
societal issues that matter
most to consumers in
those countries to help inform
our analysis.
Unless otherwise specified, all data is from the 2017 Edelman Earned Brand study.
Full explanations of the Edelman Brand Relationship Index and other analyses performed, along with detailed sample and margin of error information, can be found in the Technical Appendix.
METHODOLOGY
GLOBAL SURVEY
2ND YEAR

6. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
SHARED BELIEFS ARE
THE MOST POWERFUL
DRIVER OF COMMITMENT
6
From Involved to Committed,
brand attributes that increase the most
WE SHARE VIEWS ON
CONTROVERSIAL SOCIETAL
AND POLITICAL ISSUES
PART OF MY SOCIAL MEDIA LANDSCAPE
HELPS ME EXPRESS SOMETHING
IMPORTANT ABOUT MYSELF
Source: 2017 Edelman Earned Brand study.
Q13. Still thinking of your favorite brand in this category, what is it about this brand that makes it special to you? Using a nine-point scale that goes from not at all important to extremely important, please indicate how
important each of the following was in building the special relationship you have with this brand. (Top 4 Box, Important.) 14-country global total.
See Technical Appendix for a full explanation of how the five relationship stages and the Edelman Brand Relationship Index were built.
37
Edelman
Brand Relationship Index
2017 Global Average
STRENGTH OF THE CONSUMER-BRAND RELATIONSHIP
INDIFFERENT INTERESTED INVOLVED INVESTED COMMITTED

7. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
BRANDS ARE FALLING SHORT
7
SIGNIFICANT DECLINES IN THREE OF SEVEN DIMENSIONS OF THE CONSUMER-BRAND
RELATIONSHIP
Source: 2017 Edelman Earned Brand study. Dimensions. 13-country global total.
See Technical Appendix for a full explanation of the dimensions of the consumer-brand relationship.
2016 VS. 2017
ACTS WITH PURPOSE
“This brand is one way I
actively support causes.”
INSPIRES SHARING,
INVITES PARTNERSHIP
“I want to be associated with
what this brand is doing.”
EMBODIES
UNIQUE CHARACTER
“The brand embodies values
I can relate to.”
-3 -2 -3
CONSUMERS LESS CONVINCED THAT BRANDS ARE WITH THEM.

8. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
LESS COMMITMENT
8
CHANGE FROM 2016 TO 2017 IN THE
INVESTED AND COMMITTED LEVELS
Source: 2017 Edelman Earned Brand study. Relationship levels. 13-country global total.
See Technical Appendix for a full explanation of how the five relationship stages were built.
8%
INDIFFERENT
33%
INTERESTED
24%
INVOLVED
25%
INVESTED
10%
COMMITTED
STRENGTH OF THE CONSUMER-BRAND RELATIONSHIP
-1 -2
PERCENT OF CONSUMER-BRAND
RELATIONSHIPS AT EACH LEVEL

9. 9
NO
BRAND’S
LAND
Brands that ignore this new normal
will find themselves trapped in

10. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D 10
CONSUMERS
WANT TO
KNOW:
ARE YOU WITH ME?

11. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
A BRAND’S STAND NOW MATTERS MORE
11
Source: 2017 Edelman Earned Brand study.
NET: [Q60. How many products are you currently boycotting/not buying, that you might otherwise buy, solely because you do not like their position on a social or political issue? Q62. How many products are you
currently buying, that you would not otherwise buy, solely because you like their position on a social or political issue? (Net of 1 or more from Q60 and Q62)] NET: [Q61. Is that number higher or lower than three years
ago? Q63. Is this number higher or lower than three years ago? (Net of “Higher today” from Q61 and Q63)] 14-country global total.
57%
Are buying or boycotting brands
based on the brand’s position on a
social or political issue.
30%
Are buying or boycotting more than
three years ago.

12. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
HALF SAY THEY ARE BELIEF-DRIVEN BUYERS
12
DO YOU CHOOSE, SWITCH, AVOID OR BOYCOTT A BRAND BASED ON ITS STAND ON
CONTROVERSIAL SOCIETAL ISSUES?
Source: 2017 Edelman Earned Brand study. Belief-driven buying segments. 14-country global total.
See Technical Appendix for a full explanation of how belief-driven buying was measured.
50% SPECTATORS
Rarely buy on belief or punish
brands for taking a stand.
25% LEADERS
Have strongly-held, passionate
beliefs. The brands they buy are
one important way they express
those beliefs.
25% JOINERS
Depending on the issue and the
brand, they will change their
buying behavior based on the
brand’s stand.
50% BELIEF-DRIVEN BUYERS

13. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
28 26 26
21
25
34
25
16
53
60
51
37
Gen Z
(18-22)
Millennials
(23-37)
Gen X
(38-51)
Boomers
(52-71)
Leaders
Joiners
BELIEF-DRIVEN BUYERS ARE YOUNGER
13
PERCENT IN EACH GENERATION WHO ARE BUYING BASED ON SHARED BELIEFS
Source: 2017 Edelman Earned Brand study. Belief-driven buying segments. 14-country global total, by generation.
See Technical Appendix for a full explanation of how belief-driven buying was measured.
MILLENNIALS MOST LIKELY TO BUY
BASED ON SHARED BELIEFS IN
India 75%
China 73%
UAE 67%
U.S. 66%
Mexico 63%

14. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
27 23 26
22
25
31
49 48
57
Low Income Middle Income High Income
Leaders
Joiners
BELIEF-DRIVEN BUYERS ARE HIGHER-INCOME
14
PERCENT IN EACH INCOME GROUP WHO ARE BUYING BASED ON SHARED BELIEFS
Source: 2017 Edelman Earned Brand study. Belief-driven buying segments. 14-country global total, by income.
See Technical Appendix for a full explanation of how belief-driven buying was measured.
Low Income = bottom 25%; Middle Income = middle 50%; High Income = top 25%
HIGH-INCOME CONSUMERS MOST LIKELY
TO BUY BASED ON SHARED BELIEFS IN
China 70%
UAE 69%
Mexico 67%
India 62%
U.S. 62%

15. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
CONSUMERS BUY BASED ON SHARED BELIEFS
AROUND THE WORLD
15
PERCENT WHO ARE BUYING BASED ON SHARED BELIEFS IN EACH COUNTRY
Source: 2017 Edelman Earned Brand study. Belief-driven buying segments. 14-country global total, by country.
See Technical Appendix for a full explanation of how belief-driven buying was measured.
25
37
24 26 26 23
31 29
17 20 21
28
18 23 22
25
36
41 36 32 33 22 21
30 20 19
11
19 14 14
50
73
65
62
58 56
53
50
47
40 40 39 37 37 36
Global 14 China India UAE Mexico Brazil Singapore France U.S. Australia Canada Japan U.K. Germany The
Netherlands
Joiners
Leaders

16. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
WITH BELIEF-DRIVEN BUYERS,
SILENCE IS NOT AN OPTION
16
Source: 2017 Edelman Earned Brand study.
Q17. Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following statements. (Top 4 Box, Agree.) 14-country global total, by belief-driven buyers.
See Technical Appendix for a full explanation of how belief-driven buying was measured.
OF BELIEF-DRIVEN BUYERS
Will not buy a brand because it stayed silent
on an issue it had an obligation to address65%

17. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D 17
IF YOU
SHARE THEIR
BELIEFS,
THEY WILL REWARD YOU

18. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
GET IT RIGHT, AND WIN NEW BUYERS
18
OF BELIEF-DRIVEN BUYERS
Bought a brand for the first time because of
its position on a controversial issue
Source: 2017 Edelman Earned Brand study.
Q17. Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following statements. (Top 4 Box, Agree.) 14-country global total, by belief-driven buyers.
See Technical Appendix for a full explanation of how belief-driven buying was measured.
BRANDS GAIN
10x more than
from Spectators
67%

19. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
BUYING ON BELIEF IS A FAST TRACK
TO A STRONGER RELATIONSHIP
19
Source: 2017 Edelman Earned Brand study. Brand Relationship Index. 14-country global total, by belief-driven buying segments.
See Technical Appendix for a full explanation of how the five relationship stages, the Edelman Brand Relationship Index and belief-driven buying were built and measured.
29
Edelman
Brand Relationship Index
STRENGTH OF THE CONSUMER-BRAND RELATIONSHIP
SPECTATORS
46
BELIEF-DRIVEN
BUYERS
INDIFFERENT INTERESTED INVOLVED INVESTED COMMITTED

20. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
SPEAK UP, AND THEY WILL BUY LOYALLY
20
OF BELIEF-DRIVEN BUYERS
Buy only that brand
Buy more often
Buy first
Stay loyal
when a brand supports their position on an
issue vs. staying silent
Source: 2017 Edelman Earned Brand study. Q54. Now consider two brands. You like their products and services both equally, but one brand agrees with and supports (with time, money and considerable resources)
your position on the issue you mentioned above. The second brand is silent on this issue. It has given you no indication of where its stands. For each of the behaviors listed below, please indicate how much more
likely you would be take this action on behalf of the brand that supports your position versus the one that you like equally well but is silent on the issue. (Top 2 Box, Much more and extremely more likely.) (Average of
4 items.) Question asked of half the sample.14-country global total, by belief-driven buyers. See Technical Appendix for a full explanation of how belief-driven buying was measured.
BRANDS GAIN
2x more than
from Spectators
51%

21. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
SPEAK UP, AND THEY WILL SPEAK FOR YOU
21
Source: 2017 Edelman Earned Brand study. Q54. Now consider two brands. You like their products and services both equally, but one brand agrees with and supports (with time, money and considerable resources)
your position on the issue you mentioned above. The second brand is silent on this issue. It has given you no indication of where its stands. For each of the behaviors listed below, please indicate how much more
likely you would be take this action on behalf of the brand that supports your position versus the one that you like equally well but is silent on the issue. (Top 2 Box, much more and extremely more likely.) (Average of
4 items.), question asked of half the sample.14-country global total, by belief-driven buyers. See Technical Appendix for a full explanation of how belief-driven buying was measured.
OF BELIEF-DRIVEN BUYERS
Advocate for the brand
Defend it against critics
Criticize competitors
when a brand supports their position on an
issue vs. staying silent
2x more than
from Spectators
48% BRANDS GAIN

22. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
SPEAK UP, AND THEY WILL PAY A PREMIUM
22
Source: 2017 Edelman Earned Brand study. Q53. We are going to present you with a series of choices and ask you to tell us the one you would make in each situation. Each choice entails you deciding among three
brands of a product you really need. The first brand (1) agrees with and supports with time, money and considerable resources your position on the issue described above. The second (2) is silent on this issue. It has
given you no indication of where it stands. The third brand (3) disagrees with you on this issue and supports with time, money and considerable resources those on the other side. Assume everything about the brands
is the same or equal except for the specific difference mentioned in each question. For each set of choices please indicate which of the three brands you would mostly likely choose to buy. (Percent who selected
Brand 1 in cost scenario 2.) Question asked of half the sample. 14-country global total, by belief-driven buyers. See Technical Appendix for a full explanation of how belief-driven buying was measured.
OF BELIEF-DRIVEN BUYERS
Will pay a 25% premium
for a brand that supports their position on an issue
2x more than
from Spectators
23% BRANDS GAIN

23. YOU HAVE
TO ANSWER
THEIR CALL.
23
To move beyond No Brand’s Land,

24. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
DON’T
CO-OPT
CULTURE.
FIND YOUR CALLING.

25. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
CONNECTING YOUR BRAND TO AN ISSUE
IN THE RIGHT WAY
25
Source: 2017 Edelman Earned Brand study. Q52. Think about a societal or political issue that is both controversial and that you feel strongly about. If you had to describe this issue, which of these categories would it
fall into? Question asked of half the sample. Q49. There are many controversial societal or political issues that a brand can choose to weigh in on. Some of the issues may be ones that you feel the brand has an
obligation to take a stand on and should take leadership role in addressing. Some may be issues you feel that the brand really has no license to address and should avoid becoming involved in. For each of the types
of issues described below, please indicate whether you believe that a brand has an obligation to take a stand, or it is wrong for it to take a stand on this type of issue. (Net Obligation Score = Obligated minus Avoid),
question asked of half the sample. 14-country global total, by belief-driven buyers. See Technical Appendix for a full explanation of how belief-driven buying was measured.
WHAT ISSUES MATTER MOST?
Some of the issues that concern
belief-driven buyers:
Immigration1
Gender equality2
The environment3
Economic policy4
Racial & ethnic divisions5
HOW DOES THE ISSUE AFFECT… ?
25
23
23
23
22
20
17
15
5
Your customers
Use of your product
Your employees
How your products are made
Your brand's physical environment
Your brand's core values
Communities in which you operate
Your brand's heritage
Society at large
Strength of expectation that your brand must address (net obligation score)

26. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D 26

27. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
TALK LESS.
ACT MORE.

28. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
STRONG
RELATIONSHIPS
REQUIRE A
TRUSTED
CORPORATE
BRAND
COMMIT, LIVE AND LINK YOUR BELIEFS
28
Source: 2017 Edelman Earned Brand study. Q51. If a brand is really serious about taking a stand on a controversial societal or political issue, where and how do you expect to see evidence of that stand? On a scale,
where one means not at all important and nine means extremely important, how important is it that the brand’s position on an issue be demonstrated in the following ways? (Top 4 Box, Importance), question asked of
half the sample. Q43. Do you know the name of the company that owns or makes this brand (Yes) Q44. Please indicate how much you trust the parent company that owns or makes the brand to do what is right,
using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal” to do what is right. (Top 4 Box, Trust.) 14-country global total, by belief-driven buyers.
See Technical Appendix for a full explanation of how the five relationship stages and belief-driven buying were built and measured.
LINK
Percent of belief-driven buyers who
know and trust the corporate brand
COMMIT
Belief-driven buyers expect
brands to contribute:
1 Money
Time
Influence
1
2
3
LIVE
Belief-driven buyers say your brand’s
beliefs should be evident in your:
1 Employees
Day-to-day business activities
Sourcing/manufacturing
Advertising
1
2
3
4
72 75
87
INVOLVED INVESTED COMMITTED
STRENGTH OF CONSUMER-BRAND RELATIONSHIP

29. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D 29

30. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D 30
INVITE THEM TO ACT.DON’T JUST
START A
CONVERSATION.

31. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
INVITE PEOPLE TO ACT ON BELIEF, AND DRIVE
CONVERSATIONS THAT EARN CUSTOMERS
31
Source: 2017 Edelman Earned Brand study. Q131-79. One last question about your favorite brand. Below is a list of people. In general, if you heard information about this brand from each of these people, how
credible would the information be--extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? “Peer sources” is a net of 134, 48, 70, 76; “Company sources” is a net of 131, 72, 135;
“Celebrity/Influencers sources” is a net of 747, 78, 71(Top 2 Box, Very/Extremely Credible) Q58. How do you usually learn about where a brand stands on controversial societal and political issues? From among the
potential sources of information listed below, select the top three that you rely upon most when it comes to finding out about a brand’s position. Question asked of half the sample. 14-country global total, by belief-
driven buyers. See Technical Appendix for a full explanation of how belief-driven buying was measured.
PEER-DRIVEN CONVERSATIONS ARE MORE CREDIBLE
THAN CELEBRITIES AND COMPANY SOURCES
Percent of belief-driven buyers who say each information source about
brands is very/extremely credible
PEOPLE RELY ON CONVERSATIONS AND THE MEDIA TO
LEARN ABOUT A BRAND’S BELIEFS
Where belief-driven buyers learn about where a brand stands on
controversial issues
89 79 74 69
Peer
sources
Expert
sources
Company
sources
Celebrities/
influencers
1 Conversations with friends and family
Newspapers, magazines, TV
Your customers on social media
Your brand’s advertising
1
2
3
4

32. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D 32

33. BEYOND
NO BRAND’S
LAND
33

34. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
GOING BEYOND NO BRAND’S LAND
34
CO-OPTING CULTURE
PUTTING OUT A POINT
OF VIEW
JUST STARTING
CONVERSATIONS
FROM
FIND YOUR CALLING
ACTING MORE THAN YOU TALK
INVITING THEM TO ACT
TO

35. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
BUYING ON BELIEF IS A FAST TRACK TO A
STRONGER RELATIONSHIP
35
Source: 2017 Edelman Earned Brand study. Edelman Brand Relationship Index. 14-country global total, by belief-driven buying segments.
See Technical Appendix for a full explanation of how the five relationship stages, the Edelman Brand Relationship Index and belief-driven buying were built and measured.
29
Edelman
Brand Relationship Index
STRENGTH OF THE CONSUMER-BRAND RELATIONSHIP
SPECTATORS
46
BELIEF-DRIVEN
BUYERS
INDIFFERENT INTERESTED INVOLVED INVESTED COMMITTED

36. YOU HAVE
TO ANSWER
THEIR CALL.
36
People are buying brands based on their beliefs

37. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D 37
DO YOU WANT
TO STAY IN
NO BRAND’S
LAND?
OR WILL YOU
ANSWER THE CALL?

38. 2017 EDELMAN EARNED BRAND STUDY
DATAAPPENDIX
J U N E 2 0 1 7

39. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
-3
--
-1
+1
-2
+1
-3
-1
THE SEVEN DIMENSIONS IN 2017
39
STRENGTH OF THE CONSUMER-BRAND RELATIONSHIP
INDIFFERENT INTERESTED INVOLVED INVESTED COMMITTED
Source: 2017 Edelman Earned Brand study. Dimensions. 13-country global total.
See Technical Appendix for a full explanation of the dimensions of the consumer-brand relationship.
STRENGTH OF EACH OF THE SEVEN DIMENSIONS OF THE CONSUMER-BRAND RELATIONSHIP
Edelman
Brand Relationship Index
2017 Global Average
37
The Edelman Brand Relationship
scale measures the strength of the
consumer-brand relationship across
seven dimensions. The Index is
calculated as an average of the seven
dimensions.
LAGGING LEADING Y-T-Y CHANGE
30
43
37
36
33
38
41
Acts with purpose
Builds trust at every touchpoint
Inspires sharing, invites partnership
Listens openly, responds selectively
Tells a memorable story
Makes its mark
Embodies unique character

40. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
CONSUMER-BRAND RELATIONSHIP
ACROSS CATEGORIES
40
STRENGTH OF THE CONSUMER-BRAND RELATIONSHIP BY CATEGORY
Source: 2017 Edelman Earned Brand study. Brand Relationship Index. 13-country global total, by category.
See Technical Appendix for a full explanation of how the Edelman Brand Relationship Index was built.
*Categories added in 2017
Y-to-Y change
40 40 39 39 39 39 38 37 37 37 36 36 36 35
33 32 31 31
Automobile
Luxury
goods
Fashion
Financial
services
Retailers
Social
media
*Entertainment
Travel
Foodand
beverage
*Personal
technology
Creditcards
Mobile
carriers
Personal
care
Beer,wine
andspirits
Household
products
Utilities
OTC
medicines
Perscription
medicines
-3 -1 -3 -1 -1 -4 n/a -2 -2 n/a -2 -2 -3 -2 -2 -1 -2 -3
Edelman
Brand Relationship Index
2017 Global Average
37
Brand
Relationship Index

41. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
CONSUMER-BRAND RELATIONSHIP
BY COUNTRY
41
STRENGTH OF THE CONSUMER-BRAND RELATIONSHIP BY COUNTRY
Source: 2017 Edelman Earned Brand study. Brand Relationship Index. 13-country global total, by country.
See Technical Appendix for a full explanation of how the Edelman Brand Relationship Index was built.
*UAE added in 2017, so not included in the Global 13 total.
Y-to-Y change
-3 -1 -3 -1 -1 -4 n/a -2 -2 n/a -2 -2 -3 -2 -2 -1 -2 -3
Edelman
Brand Relationship Index
2017 Global Average
37
Brand
Relationship Index
52
48
43
40 39 38 38
34 33 32 32 31 31
29
China
India
*UAE
U.S.
Singapore
Brazil
Mexico
U.K.
Australia
Canada
Japan
France
Germany
The
Netherlands
-1 -4 n/a - - -5 -1 1 1 - - -1 -3 -1

42. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
42
44
37
30
Gen Z
(18-22)
Millennials
(23-37)
Gen X
(38-51)
Boomers
(52-71)
CONSUMER-BRAND RELATIONSHIP
ACROSS GENERATIONS
42
STRENGTH OF THE CONSUMER-BRAND RELATIONSHIP BY GENERATION
Source: 2017 Edelman Earned Brand study. Edelman Brand Relationship Index. 13-country global total, by generation.
See Technical Appendix for a full explanation of how the Edelman Brand Relationship Index was built.
Edelman
Brand Relationship Index
2017 Global Average
37
Y-to-Y change
Brand
Relationship Index
The Edelman Brand Relationship
Index reveals that consumer-brand
relationships are strongest among
Millennials, and strengthening the
fastest among Gen Z.
+4 -- -2 -2

43. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
36 36
41
36
38
Low
Income
Middle
Income
High
Income
Female Male
CONSUMER-BRAND RELATIONSHIP
BY INCOME AND GENDER
43
STRENGTH OF THE CONSUMER-BRAND RELATIONSHIP BY
INCOME AND GENDER
Edelman
Brand Relationship Index
2017 Global Average
37
Y-to-Y change
Brand
Relationship Index
The Edelman Brand Relationship
Index reveals that consumer-brand
relationships are strongest among
those with high incomes and among
males.
-1 -- -2 -- -2
Source: 2017 Edelman Earned Brand study. Edelman Brand Relationship Index. 13-country global total, by income and gender.
See Technical Appendix for a full explanation of how the Brand Relationship Index was built.
Low Income = bottom 25%; Middle Income = middle 50%; High Income = top 25%

44. 2017 EDELMAN EARNED BRAND STUDY
TECHNICAL
APPENDIX
J U N E 2 0 1 7

45. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
2017 EDELMAN EARNED BRAND STUDY
TECHNICAL APPENDIX
45
Methodology
The sample
How were the three types of belief-driven buyers
identified?
1
How was the Edelman Brand Relationship
Index built?
The Earned Brand team
2
3
4
5

46. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
2017 EDELMAN EARNED BRAND STUDY
46
14,000
RESPONDENTS
1,000 per country,
nationally representative
of age, gender, and region
based on most recent
country census data.
14
COUNTRIES
Online survey in Australia,
Brazil, Canada, China,
France, Germany, India,
Japan, Mexico, The
Netherlands, Singapore,
UAE, U.K., and the U.S.
SURVEY
TIMING
March 31 –
April 24, 2017
THE EDELMAN BRAND
RELATIONSHIP INDEX
Measures the strength
of the relationship consumers
have with the favorite brand
they buy across 7
dimensions. Measures
relationships across 18 brand
categories.
SOCIAL
LISTENING
We listened to consumer
conversations on social
media to understand the
societal issues that matter
most to consumers in
those countries to help inform
our analysis.
METHODOLOGY
GLOBAL SURVEY
2ND YEAR

47. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
2017 EDELMAN EARNED BRAND | THE SAMPLE
47
COUNTRY INTERNET PENETRATION SAMPLE SIZE LANGUAGES QUOTA PARAMETERS
AUSTRALIA 85% 1,000 English Gender, age & region
BRAZIL 66% 1,000 Portuguese Gender, age & region
CANADA 88% 1,000 English & localized French Gender, age & region
CHINA 52% 1,000 Simplified Chinese (Mandarin) Gender, age & region
FRANCE 86% 1,000 French Gender, age & region
GERMANY 88% 1,000 German Gender, age & region
INDIA 35% 1,000 English Gender, age & region
JAPAN 91% 1,000 Japanese Gender, age & region
MEXICO 45% 1,000 Localized Spanish Gender, age & region
NETHERLANDS 94% 1,000 Dutch Gender, age & region
SINGAPORE 82% 1,000 English & Simplified Chinese Gender, age & region
UAE 91% 1,000 English & Arabic Gender, age & region & ethnicity
U.K. 93% 1,000 English Gender, age & region & ethnicity
U.S. 88% 1,000 English Gender, age & region & ethnicity
14-country global data margin of error: +/-0.8% (N=14,000), global index scores +/- 0.39 points (N=14,000). Country-specific data margin of error: +/- 3.1% ( N=1,000), country index scores +/- 1.56 points (N = 1,000).
Category specific data margin of error: +/-2.7% (N=1,338-1,699), category index scores +/- 1.3 points (N=1,338-1,699), Millennial specific data margin of error: +/- 1.4% (N=4,654), millennial index scores +/- 0.6
points (N=4,654).

48. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
HOW WERE THE THREE TYPES OF
BELIEF-DRIVEN BUYERS IDENTIFIED?
48
We developed a series of six nine-point questions
to measure the extent to which beliefs affect people’s
buying behaviors:
We then classified respondents into three segments
based on their responses to the above items:
1
Even if a company makes the product that I like most, I will not buy it if I
disagree with the company’s stand on important social issues
I have bought a brand for the first time for the sole reason that I
appreciated its position on a controversial societal or political issue
I have stopped buying one brand and started buying another because I
liked the politics of one more than the other
I have strong opinions about many societal and political issues. The
brands I choose to buy and not buy are one important way I express
those opinions
If a brand offers the best price on a product, I will buy it even if
I disagree with the company’s stand on controversial social or
political issues [reversed scored]
I have stopped buying a brand solely because it remained silent on a
controversial societal or political issue that I believed it had an obligation
to publicly address
LEADERS JOINERS SPECTATORS
Have strongly-held,
passionate beliefs.
The brands they buy
are one important
way they express
those beliefs.
Depending on the
issue and the brand,
they will change
their buying behavior
based on the
brand’s stand.
Rarely buy on belief
or punish brands that
take a stand.
1
2
3
4
5
6

49. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
HOW WAS THE EDELMAN
BRAND RELATIONSHIP INDEX BUILT?
49
Respondents were asked to describe their relationship with their
favorite brand in three categories, assigned to them at random from
among the 18 categories examined in this research. The only
stipulation placed on their brand choice was that the brand had to be
one they currently own, use or purchase.
• Automobile
• Beer, wine, and spirits
• Credit cards
• Entertainment platforms
• Fashion
• Financial services
• Food and beverage
• Household products
• Luxury goods
• Mobile carriers
• OTC medicines
• Personal care
• Personal technology
• Prescription medicines
• Retailers
• Social media
• Travel
• Utilities
Product categories included in the study
1. WHAT IS YOUR FAVORITE BRAND IN THIS
CATEGORY, ONE THAT YOU CURRENTLY BUY
OR USE?

50. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
HOW WAS THE EDELMAN BRAND
RELATIONSHIP INDEX BUILT?
50
Respondents gave each of the brands seven ratings, from zero to
five, depending on how deeply involved they were with the brand
along each of the seven relationship dimensions.
Embodies unique character
Makes its mark
Tells a memorable story
Listens openly, responds selectively
Inspires sharing, invites partnership
Builds trust at every touchpoint
Acts with purpose
2. PLEASE DESCRIBE YOUR RELATIONSHIP WITH
THIS BRAND, ACROSS SEVEN DIMENSIONS.
11
2
3
4
5
6
7

51. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
THE SEVEN DIMENSIONS
OF THE CONSUMER-BRAND RELATIONSHIP
51
HOW EACH DIMENSION IS DEFINED AT EACH LEVEL OF THE CONSUMER-BRAND RELATIONSHIP
INDIFFERENT INTERESTED INVOLVED INVESTED COMMITTED
EMBODIES UNIQUE
CHARACTER
Not much different from its competitors
Different from many other
products/services in the category
Offers unique products/services
Bigger than the products/services it
delivers--has its own unique
personality
Embodies an idea or value or
lifestyle I can relate to; helps me
express something
MAKES ITS MARK
I buy this brand out of habit. I have no
real attachment to or affection for it
I go out of my way to buy this brand,
even if it is not the cheapest or
most convenient
The only brand I will buy. If it is not
available, I will do without until I can
find it again
My relationship with this brand goes
beyond liking it as a product or service
A positive force in my life. This brand
represents a lifestyle or way of life that
defines me.
TELLS A
MEMORABLE STORY
I do not have any idea of what this
brand stands for or about its heritage
This brand has a story about what it
stands for and its heritage
I admire what the brand stands for and
its heritage
I can identify with the brand’s story
and heritage
I am part of the brand’s story; we
share a heritage, a future, a set
of values
LISTENS OPENLY,
RESPONDS
SELECTIVELY
I would not know how to go about
reaching out to or interacting with
this brand
If I had something to say, I know I
could get a message to the people
behind this brand
This brand often gives me
opportunities to engage with it or to
give it feedback and input
I have communicated with this brand
in some way
I have ongoing interactions with this
brand. It is part of my social circle
INSPIRES SHARING,
INVITES PARTNERSHIP
Unware of what this brand is doing
or saying
I remember seeing some
advertising/promotions, and
sometimes see things about it in the
news or online
I notice and pay attention to what this
brand is saying and doing when I see
its ads, other content, or news about
the brand
I am likely to forward, share or repost
news/online content about this brand,
or share information about my
experiences with it
Has become part of my social life. I am
likely to participate in promotions,
engage with its content online, attend
its events
BUILDS TRUST AT
EVERY TOUCHPOINT
I do not really trust this brand
I trust this brand to make good
products/services at a fair price
I trust that this brand makes business
decisions with interests of its
customers top of mind
Makes all of its business decisions
with the best interests of the broader
society top of mind
I would stick by and defend this brand
even if I was disappointed, I have faith
it will correct mistakes
ACTS WITH PURPOSE
Unaware if it supports any causes or
has any social purpose beyond
making good products/services
Contributes to the greater good in
some way, in how the product/service
is made delivered, or by actively
supporting social causes
The brand’s greater purpose or the
social causes that it supports are
important and worthwhile
This brand’s cause or social purpose
is something that I share and
also support
Supporting this brand is one way I
support a cause I believe in; because
of this brand I have become even
more actively engaged in the cause

52. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
The Edelman Brand Relationship Index was
calculated by taking the average of the seven
dimension scores and multiplying by twenty to
convert the index to a 100 point scale.
The 2017 Global Brand Relationship
score of 37 represents the average Brand
Relationship Index across the 42,000 (14,000
X 3) consumer-brand relationships analyzed.
HOW WAS THE EDELMAN
BRAND RELATIONSHIP
INDEX BUILT?
52
37
2017 Edelman
Brand Relationship Index
Global Average
0-6
INDIFFERENT
7-26
INTERESTED
27-43
INVOLVED
44-69
INVESTED
70-100
COMMITTED
STRENGTH OF THE CONSUMER-BRAND RELATIONSHIP
3. CONSTRUCTING THE SCALE.

53. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
4. DEFINING THE RELATIONSHIP LEVELS.
HOW WAS THE EDELMAN
BRAND RELATIONSHIP
INDEX BUILT?
53
STRENGTH OF THE CONSUMER-BRAND RELATIONSHIP
2017 Edelman
Brand Relationship Index
An Edelman Brand Relationship Index score can vary
from zero to 100. In working with the scale, we identified
five unique relationship levels. The cut-points that define
each level are displayed below.
These relationship levels were empirically determined
based on two criteria.
The first was a correspondence between relationship
level as determined by the Edelman Brand Relationship
Index and respondents’ self-described level of
attachment to a given brand.
The second was how distinct the levels were when
profiled against key marketplace behaviors of general
interest to brands.
The resulting relationship levels and cut-points represent
an optimized result that captures both respondents’
explicitly stated level of relationship with a brand and
their implicit level of relationship as defined by their
willingness to buy that brand first as well as to
advocate for and defend it.
0-6
INDIFFERENT
7-26
INTERESTED
27-43
INVOLVED
44-69
INVESTED
70-100
COMMITTED

54. E D E L M A N E A R N E D B R A N D
THE EARNED BRAND TEAM
54
TONIA E. RIES
Edelman Square
Tonia is Executive Director of Edelman Square, a role that includes stewardship of the Trust
Barometer, now in its 17th year, the Earned Brand research into consumer relationships with
brands, as well as the development of new research initiatives.
She leads the firm’s global knowledge agenda across practices, geographies and clients, and
acts as a catalyst for new thinking and discourse on business in a multi-stakeholder society.
Tonia has more than 25 years of experience in marketing, research, strategy, conferences,
and media.
DAVID M. BERSOFF, PH.D.
Edelman Intelligence
David is in charge of global thought leadership research at Edelman Intelligence, a world-
class research and analytics consultancy.
Before joining Edelman Intelligence, Dr. Bersoff served as The Futures Company’s Chief
Insights Officer. In that role, he drove the research, data analysis, IP creation and product
development strategy for all of their syndicated consumer insights offers, including the
Yankelovich MONITOR.
David holds a Ph.D. in social and cross-cultural psychology from Yale University.
SARAH ADKINS
Edelman Intelligence
Sarah leads the operations side of all IP projects at Edelman Intelligence.
Prior to joining the EI team, Sarah spent 8 years at Nielsen designing surveys, conducting
data analysis and working closely with clients from all industries. She has 16+ years of
experience in market research, with more than half of that spent in the brand and
communications industry.
Sarah graduated from Fredonia State University with a bachelors degree in business
administration, specializing in marketing and communications.
KISHA R. STOKES
Edelman Square
Kisha manages Intellectual Property assets for the firm’s top revenue-driving research
studies, Edelman’s Trust Barometer and Earned Brand.
She supports the Executive Director with day-to-day administration of company-wide IP
related projects – including requests for data/insights, presentation development,
insights/headlines review, data visualization, and other special projects.
Kisha holds a Master’s of Science degree in Kinesiology from James Madison University.
CODY ARMSTRONG
Edelman Intelligence
Cody manages the day-to-day operations of all Intellectual Property research conducted by
Edelman Intelligence.
He has five years of experience in the market research industry, with more than three of them
spent on the IP research team. Cody’s background includes secondary research, where he
conducted media analysis for clients across several industries.
Cody holds a B.A. in Sociology from the University at Albany, where he also dual minored in
Psychology and Business.
JAMIS BRUENING
Edelman Intelligence
Jamis handles the data management, processing, and analysis for all IP-related projects run
by Edelman Intelligence.
An environmental scientist by training, Jamis came to EI with several years of research in an
academic setting, where he studied climate dynamics and global environmental change.
Jamis holds a M.S. in Environmental Science from Western Washington University, and
previously graduated from Colgate University where he studied physics and geography.