2. Historical Perspective
1878 Invention of thermometer
Carl Wunderlich
1907 First series on prolonged fever
Richard C Cabot - 784 cases
Typhoid fever - 75%
Sepsis - 9%
TB - 7%
3. Historical Perspective
1961 Diagnostic criteria for PUO
(Petersdorf & Beeson)
Illness of at least 3 weeks duration
Fever of >38.3 oC on several occasions
Undiagnosed after 1 week study in hospital
4.
5. PUO Redefined
Durack & Street (1991)
‘Classic’ PUO
Nosocomial PUO
Neutropaenic PUO
HIV associated PUO
Episodic PUO
7. Nosocomial PUO
Fever > 38.30C, >3 days,
not present or incubating on admission,
negative cultures after 2 days
Neutropenic PUO
Fever > 38.3 0C, >3 days,
< 500 polymorph neutrophils/mm3,
negative cultures after 2 days
HIV-associated PUO
Fever > 38.30C,
>4 weeks for outpatients or
> 3 days for inpatients,
HIV infection confirmed
15. HIV associated PUO
PUO occurs with low CD4 cell count <100/µL
Fever persists for a mean of 42 d before diagnosis
Time taken for diagnosis same as in Classic PUO
Infections commonest cause –
TB, DMAC, PCP, CMV
Leishmaniasis
Disseminated histoplasmosis
Lymphoma, the cause in 7% cases
16. HIV associated PUO
Respiratory tract Pneumocystis, Myc TB,
MAI, CMV
CNS Toxoplasma
GIT Salmonella, Shigella,
Campylobacter
Genital tract, disseminated T pallidum, N gonorrhoeae
17.
18. Nosocomial PUO
Vascular line related staphylococci
Other device related staphylococci, Candida
Transfusion related hepatitis, CMV
Pneumonia (Ventilator) Gm - rods, incl
Pseudomonas
Post-op abscesses Gm – rods, anaerobes
Postgastric surgery systemic candidiasis
19. Neutropaenic PUO
Vascular- line related staphylococci
Oral infection Candida, HSV
Pneumonia Gm – rods, Candida,
Aspergillus, CMV
Soft tissue Mixed aerobes, and
anaerobes
20. Approach to FUO
Stage 1 History
Physical examination
Screening tests
Stage 2 Review history
Repeat physical examination
Specific diagnostic tests
Non-invasive investigations
Sage 3 Invasive tests
Stage 4 Therapeutic trials
21. Investigations in PUO
•Potential diagnostic clues (PDCs) should guide
investigations. Screening tests – low yield
•Non-invasive lab tests diagnosis in ¼ cases
•BMC not justified for routine initial evaluation
BM examination - diagnostic yield 0 – 14%
•Liver biopsy - diagnostic yield – 14%
•Abdominal CT, USG - for all cases of PUO
CT/USG guided biopsy – diagnostic yield
22. Newer modalities
Cultivation dependent microbial detection
Sequence- based molecular methods
Newer diagnostic technologies
High density micro-arrays
Improved nucleic acid subtractive methods
Novel bioassays for toxin activity
24. Outcome of PUO
“…90% of patients with FUO should have a
diagnosable condition, the remaining patients will
recover. Patients should rarely die with a diagnosis
of FUO.”
Petersdorf 1992
25. Take-home Message
Uncommon manifestations of common disorders
more likely to be the cause than rare diseases
Keys to successful diagnosis
Diligent history taking & examination &
Perseverance