SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 50
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
LIFECYCLE
3130 Summer 2011
What is Software?
 Software (IEEE) is a collection of
 programs,
 procedures,
 rules, and
 associated documentation and data
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 2
Software
 Q : If you have to write a 10,000 line program in C
to solve a problem, how long will it take?
 Answers: generally range from 2-4 months
 Let us analyze the productivity
 Productivity = output/input resources
 In SW output is considered as LOC
 Input resources is effort - person months; overhead
cost modeled in rate for person month
 Though not perfect, some productivity measure is
needed, as project has to keep it high
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 3
Software …
 The productivity is 2.5-5 KLOC/PM
 Q:What is the productivity in a typical commercial
SW organization ?
 A: Between 100 to 1000 LOC/PM
 Q:Why is it low, when your productivity is so high?
(people like you work in the industry)
 A:What the student is building and what the
industry builds are two different things
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 4
Software…
 Students build: student software
 Industry builds: industrial strength Systems
 What is the difference between
 student software and
 industrial strength software
for the same problem?
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 5
Software…
Student
 Developer is the user
 Works for the typical
case most of the time
 Bugs are tolerable
 UI not important
 No documentation
Industrial Strength
 Others are the users
 Works robustly
 Bugs not tolerated
 UI very important issue
 Documents needed for
the user as well as for
the organization and the
project
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 6
Software…
Student
 SW not in critical use
 Reliability, robustness
not important
 No investment
 Don’t care about
portability
Industrial Strength
 Supports important
functions / business
 Reliability , robustness
are very important
 Heavy investment
 Portability is a key issue
here
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 7
Industrial Strength Software
 Student programs != industrial strength software
 Key difference is in quality (including usability,
reliability, portability, etc.)
 High quality requires heavy testing, which
consumes 30-50% of total development effort
 Requires development be broken in stages such
that bugs can be detected in each
 Good UI, backup, fault-tolerance, following of stds
etc all increase the size for the same functionality
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 8
Industrial strength software
 If 1/5th productivity, and increase in size by a factor
of 2, industrial strength software will take 10 times
effort
 Brooks thumb-rule: Industrial strength SW costs 10
time more than student SW
 In this course, software == industrial strength
software
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 9
Software is Expensive
 Rough cost estimate…
 Productivity = 500 LOC/PM
 Cost to the company = $10K/PM
 Cost per LOC = $20
 So each line of delivered code costs about $20.
 A simple application for a business may have
20KLOC to 50KLOC
 Cost = $100K to $1Million
 Can easily run on $10K-$20K hardware
 So HW costs <<< SW costs.
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 10
Software is Expensive…
 The HW/SW ratio for a computer system has
shown a reversal from the early years.
 In 50s , HW:SW :: 80:20
 In 80s , HW:SW :: 20:80
 So, SW is very expensive
 Importance of optimizing HW is not much
 More important to optimize SW
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 11
Late & Unreliable
 20-25% of SW projects never complete
 Because after some time they realize that the final
cost will be much higher
 Many companies report “runaways”
 Budget & cost out of control
 Consulting companies to help control them
 One defense survey found that 70% of the
equipment problems are due to SW
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 12
Why is SW Unreliable?
 SW failures are different from failures of
mechanical or electrical systems
 In software, failures are not due to aging related
problems
 Failures occur due to bugs or errors that get
introduced during development
 The bug that causes a failure typically exists from
start, only manifests later
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 13
Maintenance
 Once SW delivered, it enters maintenance phase
 Why is maintenance needed for SW when it does
not wear with age?
 Residual errors requiring corrective maintenance
 Upgrades and environment changes – adaptive
maintenance
 Over SW lifetime, maintenance can cost more than
the development cost of SW
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 14
What is Software
Engineering?
 Problem domain discussed before, now we
discuss the area of SE
 SE (IEEE): systematic approach to development
[….] of software
 Systematic approach: methodologies and
practices that can be used to solve a problem
from problem domain
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 15
Basic Problem
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 16
SE Challenges
 The problem of producing software to satisfy user
needs drives the approaches used in SE
 Q: What other factors that drive the selection of a
SE approach?
1. scale,
2. productivity,
3. quality,
4. consistency,
5. rate of change, …
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 17
1) Scale
 SE must deal with problem of scale
 methods for solving small problems do not scale up for
large problems
 industrial strength SW problems tend to be large
 SE methods must be scalable
 Two clear dimensions in this
1. engineering methods
2. project management
 For small, both can be informal or ad-hoc, for large
both have to be formalized
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 18
1) Scale…
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 19
1) Scale…
 An illustration of issue of scale is counting the
number of people in a room vs taking a census
 Both are counting problems
 Methods used in first not useful for census
 For large scale counting problem, must use different
techniques and models
 Management will become critical
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 20
1) Scale: Examples
Gcc 980KLOC C, C++, yacc
Perl 320 KLOC C, perl, sh
Appache 100 KLOC C, sh
Linux 30,000 KLOC C, C++
Windows XP 40,000 KLOC C, C++
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer
2011
21
2) Productivity
 An enginerring project is driven by cost and
schedule
 Cost: In sw, cost is mainly manpower cost; hence, it
is measured in person-months
 Schedule is in months/weeks – very important in
business context
 In Biz context
 Cost and Schedule can not be separated
 SE must serve the Biz, NOT the other way around
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 22
2) Productivity
 Productivity captures both Cost and Schedule
 If P is higher, cost is lower
 If P is higher, time taken can be lesser
 Approaches used by SE must deliver high
Productivity
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 23
3) Quality
 Quality is the other major driving factor
 Developing high Quality SW is a basic goal
 Quality of SW is harder to define
 Approaches used should produce a high Quality
software
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 24
3) Quality – ISO standard
 ISO standard has six attributes
1. Functionality
2. Reliability
3. Usability
4. Efficiency
5. Maintainability
6. Portability
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 25
3) Quality…
 Multiple dimensions mean that not easy to
reduce Q to a single number
 Concept of Q is project specific
 For some reliability is most important
 For others usability may be more important
 Reliability is generally considered the main Q
criterion
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 26
3) Quality…
 Reliability = Probability of failure
 Hard to measure
 Approximated by # of defects in software
 To normalize Quality = Defect density
 Quality = # of defects delivered / Size
 Defects delivered - approximated with no. of
defects found in operation
 Current practices: less than 1 defect/KLOC
 What is a defect? Project specific!
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 27
4) Consistency and
repeatability
 Sometimes a group can deliver one good software
system, but not a second
 Key SE challenge: how to ensure that success can be
repeated ?
 SE wants methods that can consistently produce
high Quality SW with high Productivity
 A SW org, wants to deliver high Q&P consistently
across projects
 Frameworks like
 Inter. Org. for Standardization (ISO) and
 Capability Maturity Model (CMM)
 focus on this aspect
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 28
5) Rate of Change
 Only constant in business is change!
 Software must change to support the changing
business needs
 SE practices must accommodate change
 Methods that disallow change, even if high Q and P,
are of little value
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 29
Goals of Industrial Strength
SE
 Consistently develop SW with high Q&P for large
scale problems, under change
 Q&P are the basic objectives to be achieved
 Q&P governed by people, processes, and
technology
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 30
Iron Triangle
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 31
Iron Triangle
 What happens when you
break the triangle?
 1)The project gets canceled.
 15% of projects are cancelled before they deliver a system.
 A study of 1,027 IT projects cited scope management
related to serial practices as the single largest contributing
factor to project failure in 82% of the projects and was
given a overall weighted failure influence of 25%.
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 32
www.ambysoft.com/essays/brokenTriangle.htm
Iron Triangle
 What happens when you
break the triangle?
2)The Project is deliver late, over budget, or both
 According to the Chaos Report 51% of projects are
challenged (severely over budget and/or late), with
an average cost overrun of 43%.
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 33
www.ambysoft.com/essays/brokenTriangle.htm
Iron Triangle
 What happens when you
break the triangle?
3)The Project delivers poor quality software.
 When development teams are forced to deliver more
functionality than they have time or resources for, they are often
motivated to take short cuts which inevitably result in poor
quality.
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 34
www.ambysoft.com/essays/brokenTriangle.htm
Iron Triangle
 What happens when you
break the triangle?
4)The project under delivers.
 The team fails to deliver all of the required
functionality.
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 35
www.ambysoft.com/essays/brokenTriangle.htm
Iron Triangle…
 What to do about it?
 Recognize that the iron triangle must be respected.
 So
 Vary the Scope
 Vary the Schedule
 Vary the Resources
 Vary two or more factors
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 36
www.ambysoft.com/essays/brokenTriangle.htm
SE Methodology
 SE focuses mostly on processes for achieving the
goals
 Process must be systematic
 SE separates process for developing sw from the
developed product (i.e the sw)
 Premise: Process largely determines Q&P, hence
suitable processes will lead to high Q&P
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 37
SE Methodology…
 Design of proper processes and their control is a
key challenge SE faces
 Sw process is the equivalent of manufacturing
process
 This focus on process makes SE different from
many CS courses
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 38
SE Methodology…
 The development process used in SE is typically
phased
 Phases separate concerns with each phase focusing
on some aspect
 Requirements, architecture, design, coding, testing
are key phases
 This phased process has to be properly managed to
achieve the objectives
 Metrics and measurement important for this
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 39
“V” model
http://www.harmonicss.co.uk/index.php/hss-downloads/doc_download/12-death-of-the-v-model
Summary
 The problem domain for SE is industrial strength
software
 Software comprises programs, documentation,
and data
 SE aims to provide methods for systematically
developing SW
 Main goal – achieve high quality and
productivity (Q&P)
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 41
Summary…
 Must have high Q&P with consistency in the
context of large scale and frequent changes
 Basic approach of SE is to separate process from
products and focus on process and managing
the process
CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 42
Other Processes 43
PROCESS MANAGEMENT
PROCESS
Background
 A process is not a static entity – it has to
change to improve to improve the Q&P
 Focus of process management is to evaluate
and improve the process
 Is different from project management which
focuses on a project
 Process management is an advanced topic
Other Processes 44
Software Process Improvement
 To improve the process, an org must
understand the current process
 Requires process be properly documented
 Properly executed on projects
 Data is collected from projects to understand the
performance of process on projects
 Changes to process are best made in small
increments
Other Processes 45
Software Process Improvement
Frameworks
 What changes should be made to the process
and when
 Frameworks suggest ways of how process
improvement can proceed
 Capability Maturity Model (CMM) is one of
the most common frameworks
Other Processes 46
CMM
 CMM has five maturity levels for a software
process (level 1 is ad-hoc)
 In a level, process has some capabilities and
lays the foundation for next level
 For moving from one level to another, CMM
specifies areas to focus on
 Is used heavily by sw industry
Other Processes 47
CMM
Other Processes 48
Note:
• Student projects: CMM level 1 (ad hoc)
• SW Engg. Course Project: CMM level 2
Course Project Notes
 Decide on roles and responsibilities
 Possible Roles
 Project management & Change management process
 Web site, Charter & Feasibility Doc, SRS & Project Plan,
Meeting minutes
 Design Lead
 High Level & Detailed Design Docs
 Development Lead
 Coordination of implementation efforts, system integration
 Configuration Management Lead
 Setup and management of version control and build system
 Quality Assurance &Testing Lead
 Test Docs, User manuals
Software Process 49
Course Project Notes
 Set up the website and SVN (MS1)
 Project Charter Doc (MS2)
 Anchors a project helping the team avoid mid project drift.
 Every project needs a charter! If the sponsor doesn't provide it, the
development team should create one and get it approved!
 See the Project Details document for templates.
Software Process 50

More Related Content

Similar to 2_SoftwareEngineeringLifecycle.ppt

Similar to 2_SoftwareEngineeringLifecycle.ppt (20)

ISD LECT 2and3upd.pptx
ISD LECT 2and3upd.pptxISD LECT 2and3upd.pptx
ISD LECT 2and3upd.pptx
 
IRJET- A Study on Software Reliability Models
IRJET-  	  A Study on Software Reliability ModelsIRJET-  	  A Study on Software Reliability Models
IRJET- A Study on Software Reliability Models
 
RELM Overview
RELM OverviewRELM Overview
RELM Overview
 
lecture 1-5.pdf
lecture 1-5.pdflecture 1-5.pdf
lecture 1-5.pdf
 
Unit1
Unit1Unit1
Unit1
 
1-SoftwareEngineeringandBestPractices.ppt
1-SoftwareEngineeringandBestPractices.ppt1-SoftwareEngineeringandBestPractices.ppt
1-SoftwareEngineeringandBestPractices.ppt
 
1-SoftwareEngineeringandBestPractices.ppt
1-SoftwareEngineeringandBestPractices.ppt1-SoftwareEngineeringandBestPractices.ppt
1-SoftwareEngineeringandBestPractices.ppt
 
IBM InterConnect 2013: DevOps Keynote
IBM InterConnect 2013: DevOps KeynoteIBM InterConnect 2013: DevOps Keynote
IBM InterConnect 2013: DevOps Keynote
 
Mi0033 software engineering
Mi0033   software engineeringMi0033   software engineering
Mi0033 software engineering
 
Software Defect Prediction Techniques in the Automotive Domain: Evaluation, S...
Software Defect Prediction Techniques in the Automotive Domain: Evaluation, S...Software Defect Prediction Techniques in the Automotive Domain: Evaluation, S...
Software Defect Prediction Techniques in the Automotive Domain: Evaluation, S...
 
Pm soln9416141129710
Pm soln9416141129710Pm soln9416141129710
Pm soln9416141129710
 
SECh123
SECh123SECh123
SECh123
 
Software Quality Assurance class 1
Software Quality Assurance  class 1Software Quality Assurance  class 1
Software Quality Assurance class 1
 
Project Management (October - 2016) [CBSGS - Paper Solution] {Mumbai University}
Project Management (October - 2016) [CBSGS - Paper Solution] {Mumbai University}Project Management (October - 2016) [CBSGS - Paper Solution] {Mumbai University}
Project Management (October - 2016) [CBSGS - Paper Solution] {Mumbai University}
 
Popular Pitfalls In Sdlc Phases 1
Popular Pitfalls In Sdlc Phases 1Popular Pitfalls In Sdlc Phases 1
Popular Pitfalls In Sdlc Phases 1
 
PROMISE 2011: "An Analysis of Trends in Productivity and Cost Drivers over Ye...
PROMISE 2011: "An Analysis of Trends in Productivity and Cost Drivers over Ye...PROMISE 2011: "An Analysis of Trends in Productivity and Cost Drivers over Ye...
PROMISE 2011: "An Analysis of Trends in Productivity and Cost Drivers over Ye...
 
Hci in-the-software-process-1
Hci in-the-software-process-1Hci in-the-software-process-1
Hci in-the-software-process-1
 
SW_Cost_Estimation.ppt
SW_Cost_Estimation.pptSW_Cost_Estimation.ppt
SW_Cost_Estimation.ppt
 
Managing Complexity and Change with Scalable Software Design
Managing Complexity and Change with Scalable Software DesignManaging Complexity and Change with Scalable Software Design
Managing Complexity and Change with Scalable Software Design
 
An Introduction To Software Engineering
An Introduction To Software EngineeringAn Introduction To Software Engineering
An Introduction To Software Engineering
 

Recently uploaded

Large-scale Logging Made Easy: Meetup at Deutsche Bank 2024
Large-scale Logging Made Easy: Meetup at Deutsche Bank 2024Large-scale Logging Made Easy: Meetup at Deutsche Bank 2024
Large-scale Logging Made Easy: Meetup at Deutsche Bank 2024
VictoriaMetrics
 

Recently uploaded (20)

BUS PASS MANGEMENT SYSTEM USING PHP.pptx
BUS PASS MANGEMENT SYSTEM USING PHP.pptxBUS PASS MANGEMENT SYSTEM USING PHP.pptx
BUS PASS MANGEMENT SYSTEM USING PHP.pptx
 
WSO2CON 2024 - Navigating API Complexity: REST, GraphQL, gRPC, Websocket, Web...
WSO2CON 2024 - Navigating API Complexity: REST, GraphQL, gRPC, Websocket, Web...WSO2CON 2024 - Navigating API Complexity: REST, GraphQL, gRPC, Websocket, Web...
WSO2CON 2024 - Navigating API Complexity: REST, GraphQL, gRPC, Websocket, Web...
 
WSO2Con2024 - Hello Choreo Presentation - Kanchana
WSO2Con2024 - Hello Choreo Presentation - KanchanaWSO2Con2024 - Hello Choreo Presentation - Kanchana
WSO2Con2024 - Hello Choreo Presentation - Kanchana
 
WSO2CON 2024 Slides - Open Source to SaaS
WSO2CON 2024 Slides - Open Source to SaaSWSO2CON 2024 Slides - Open Source to SaaS
WSO2CON 2024 Slides - Open Source to SaaS
 
Large-scale Logging Made Easy: Meetup at Deutsche Bank 2024
Large-scale Logging Made Easy: Meetup at Deutsche Bank 2024Large-scale Logging Made Easy: Meetup at Deutsche Bank 2024
Large-scale Logging Made Easy: Meetup at Deutsche Bank 2024
 
WSO2CON 2024 - Building the API First Enterprise – Running an API Program, fr...
WSO2CON 2024 - Building the API First Enterprise – Running an API Program, fr...WSO2CON 2024 - Building the API First Enterprise – Running an API Program, fr...
WSO2CON 2024 - Building the API First Enterprise – Running an API Program, fr...
 
%in Midrand+277-882-255-28 abortion pills for sale in midrand
%in Midrand+277-882-255-28 abortion pills for sale in midrand%in Midrand+277-882-255-28 abortion pills for sale in midrand
%in Midrand+277-882-255-28 abortion pills for sale in midrand
 
WSO2CON 2024 - WSO2's Digital Transformation Journey with Choreo: A Platforml...
WSO2CON 2024 - WSO2's Digital Transformation Journey with Choreo: A Platforml...WSO2CON 2024 - WSO2's Digital Transformation Journey with Choreo: A Platforml...
WSO2CON 2024 - WSO2's Digital Transformation Journey with Choreo: A Platforml...
 
WSO2Con2024 - From Blueprint to Brilliance: WSO2's Guide to API-First Enginee...
WSO2Con2024 - From Blueprint to Brilliance: WSO2's Guide to API-First Enginee...WSO2Con2024 - From Blueprint to Brilliance: WSO2's Guide to API-First Enginee...
WSO2Con2024 - From Blueprint to Brilliance: WSO2's Guide to API-First Enginee...
 
%in kempton park+277-882-255-28 abortion pills for sale in kempton park
%in kempton park+277-882-255-28 abortion pills for sale in kempton park %in kempton park+277-882-255-28 abortion pills for sale in kempton park
%in kempton park+277-882-255-28 abortion pills for sale in kempton park
 
VTU technical seminar 8Th Sem on Scikit-learn
VTU technical seminar 8Th Sem on Scikit-learnVTU technical seminar 8Th Sem on Scikit-learn
VTU technical seminar 8Th Sem on Scikit-learn
 
WSO2Con2024 - From Code To Cloud: Fast Track Your Cloud Native Journey with C...
WSO2Con2024 - From Code To Cloud: Fast Track Your Cloud Native Journey with C...WSO2Con2024 - From Code To Cloud: Fast Track Your Cloud Native Journey with C...
WSO2Con2024 - From Code To Cloud: Fast Track Your Cloud Native Journey with C...
 
WSO2Con2024 - WSO2's IAM Vision: Identity-Led Digital Transformation
WSO2Con2024 - WSO2's IAM Vision: Identity-Led Digital TransformationWSO2Con2024 - WSO2's IAM Vision: Identity-Led Digital Transformation
WSO2Con2024 - WSO2's IAM Vision: Identity-Led Digital Transformation
 
WSO2CON 2024 Slides - Unlocking Value with AI
WSO2CON 2024 Slides - Unlocking Value with AIWSO2CON 2024 Slides - Unlocking Value with AI
WSO2CON 2024 Slides - Unlocking Value with AI
 
Artyushina_Guest lecture_YorkU CS May 2024.pptx
Artyushina_Guest lecture_YorkU CS May 2024.pptxArtyushina_Guest lecture_YorkU CS May 2024.pptx
Artyushina_Guest lecture_YorkU CS May 2024.pptx
 
AI & Machine Learning Presentation Template
AI & Machine Learning Presentation TemplateAI & Machine Learning Presentation Template
AI & Machine Learning Presentation Template
 
%in Stilfontein+277-882-255-28 abortion pills for sale in Stilfontein
%in Stilfontein+277-882-255-28 abortion pills for sale in Stilfontein%in Stilfontein+277-882-255-28 abortion pills for sale in Stilfontein
%in Stilfontein+277-882-255-28 abortion pills for sale in Stilfontein
 
%in Bahrain+277-882-255-28 abortion pills for sale in Bahrain
%in Bahrain+277-882-255-28 abortion pills for sale in Bahrain%in Bahrain+277-882-255-28 abortion pills for sale in Bahrain
%in Bahrain+277-882-255-28 abortion pills for sale in Bahrain
 
WSO2CON 2024 - Does Open Source Still Matter?
WSO2CON 2024 - Does Open Source Still Matter?WSO2CON 2024 - Does Open Source Still Matter?
WSO2CON 2024 - Does Open Source Still Matter?
 
%in Soweto+277-882-255-28 abortion pills for sale in soweto
%in Soweto+277-882-255-28 abortion pills for sale in soweto%in Soweto+277-882-255-28 abortion pills for sale in soweto
%in Soweto+277-882-255-28 abortion pills for sale in soweto
 

2_SoftwareEngineeringLifecycle.ppt

  • 2. What is Software?  Software (IEEE) is a collection of  programs,  procedures,  rules, and  associated documentation and data CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 2
  • 3. Software  Q : If you have to write a 10,000 line program in C to solve a problem, how long will it take?  Answers: generally range from 2-4 months  Let us analyze the productivity  Productivity = output/input resources  In SW output is considered as LOC  Input resources is effort - person months; overhead cost modeled in rate for person month  Though not perfect, some productivity measure is needed, as project has to keep it high CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 3
  • 4. Software …  The productivity is 2.5-5 KLOC/PM  Q:What is the productivity in a typical commercial SW organization ?  A: Between 100 to 1000 LOC/PM  Q:Why is it low, when your productivity is so high? (people like you work in the industry)  A:What the student is building and what the industry builds are two different things CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 4
  • 5. Software…  Students build: student software  Industry builds: industrial strength Systems  What is the difference between  student software and  industrial strength software for the same problem? CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 5
  • 6. Software… Student  Developer is the user  Works for the typical case most of the time  Bugs are tolerable  UI not important  No documentation Industrial Strength  Others are the users  Works robustly  Bugs not tolerated  UI very important issue  Documents needed for the user as well as for the organization and the project CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 6
  • 7. Software… Student  SW not in critical use  Reliability, robustness not important  No investment  Don’t care about portability Industrial Strength  Supports important functions / business  Reliability , robustness are very important  Heavy investment  Portability is a key issue here CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 7
  • 8. Industrial Strength Software  Student programs != industrial strength software  Key difference is in quality (including usability, reliability, portability, etc.)  High quality requires heavy testing, which consumes 30-50% of total development effort  Requires development be broken in stages such that bugs can be detected in each  Good UI, backup, fault-tolerance, following of stds etc all increase the size for the same functionality CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 8
  • 9. Industrial strength software  If 1/5th productivity, and increase in size by a factor of 2, industrial strength software will take 10 times effort  Brooks thumb-rule: Industrial strength SW costs 10 time more than student SW  In this course, software == industrial strength software CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 9
  • 10. Software is Expensive  Rough cost estimate…  Productivity = 500 LOC/PM  Cost to the company = $10K/PM  Cost per LOC = $20  So each line of delivered code costs about $20.  A simple application for a business may have 20KLOC to 50KLOC  Cost = $100K to $1Million  Can easily run on $10K-$20K hardware  So HW costs <<< SW costs. CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 10
  • 11. Software is Expensive…  The HW/SW ratio for a computer system has shown a reversal from the early years.  In 50s , HW:SW :: 80:20  In 80s , HW:SW :: 20:80  So, SW is very expensive  Importance of optimizing HW is not much  More important to optimize SW CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 11
  • 12. Late & Unreliable  20-25% of SW projects never complete  Because after some time they realize that the final cost will be much higher  Many companies report “runaways”  Budget & cost out of control  Consulting companies to help control them  One defense survey found that 70% of the equipment problems are due to SW CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 12
  • 13. Why is SW Unreliable?  SW failures are different from failures of mechanical or electrical systems  In software, failures are not due to aging related problems  Failures occur due to bugs or errors that get introduced during development  The bug that causes a failure typically exists from start, only manifests later CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 13
  • 14. Maintenance  Once SW delivered, it enters maintenance phase  Why is maintenance needed for SW when it does not wear with age?  Residual errors requiring corrective maintenance  Upgrades and environment changes – adaptive maintenance  Over SW lifetime, maintenance can cost more than the development cost of SW CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 14
  • 15. What is Software Engineering?  Problem domain discussed before, now we discuss the area of SE  SE (IEEE): systematic approach to development [….] of software  Systematic approach: methodologies and practices that can be used to solve a problem from problem domain CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 15
  • 16. Basic Problem CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 16
  • 17. SE Challenges  The problem of producing software to satisfy user needs drives the approaches used in SE  Q: What other factors that drive the selection of a SE approach? 1. scale, 2. productivity, 3. quality, 4. consistency, 5. rate of change, … CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 17
  • 18. 1) Scale  SE must deal with problem of scale  methods for solving small problems do not scale up for large problems  industrial strength SW problems tend to be large  SE methods must be scalable  Two clear dimensions in this 1. engineering methods 2. project management  For small, both can be informal or ad-hoc, for large both have to be formalized CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 18
  • 19. 1) Scale… CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 19
  • 20. 1) Scale…  An illustration of issue of scale is counting the number of people in a room vs taking a census  Both are counting problems  Methods used in first not useful for census  For large scale counting problem, must use different techniques and models  Management will become critical CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 20
  • 21. 1) Scale: Examples Gcc 980KLOC C, C++, yacc Perl 320 KLOC C, perl, sh Appache 100 KLOC C, sh Linux 30,000 KLOC C, C++ Windows XP 40,000 KLOC C, C++ CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 21
  • 22. 2) Productivity  An enginerring project is driven by cost and schedule  Cost: In sw, cost is mainly manpower cost; hence, it is measured in person-months  Schedule is in months/weeks – very important in business context  In Biz context  Cost and Schedule can not be separated  SE must serve the Biz, NOT the other way around CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 22
  • 23. 2) Productivity  Productivity captures both Cost and Schedule  If P is higher, cost is lower  If P is higher, time taken can be lesser  Approaches used by SE must deliver high Productivity CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 23
  • 24. 3) Quality  Quality is the other major driving factor  Developing high Quality SW is a basic goal  Quality of SW is harder to define  Approaches used should produce a high Quality software CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 24
  • 25. 3) Quality – ISO standard  ISO standard has six attributes 1. Functionality 2. Reliability 3. Usability 4. Efficiency 5. Maintainability 6. Portability CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 25
  • 26. 3) Quality…  Multiple dimensions mean that not easy to reduce Q to a single number  Concept of Q is project specific  For some reliability is most important  For others usability may be more important  Reliability is generally considered the main Q criterion CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 26
  • 27. 3) Quality…  Reliability = Probability of failure  Hard to measure  Approximated by # of defects in software  To normalize Quality = Defect density  Quality = # of defects delivered / Size  Defects delivered - approximated with no. of defects found in operation  Current practices: less than 1 defect/KLOC  What is a defect? Project specific! CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 27
  • 28. 4) Consistency and repeatability  Sometimes a group can deliver one good software system, but not a second  Key SE challenge: how to ensure that success can be repeated ?  SE wants methods that can consistently produce high Quality SW with high Productivity  A SW org, wants to deliver high Q&P consistently across projects  Frameworks like  Inter. Org. for Standardization (ISO) and  Capability Maturity Model (CMM)  focus on this aspect CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 28
  • 29. 5) Rate of Change  Only constant in business is change!  Software must change to support the changing business needs  SE practices must accommodate change  Methods that disallow change, even if high Q and P, are of little value CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 29
  • 30. Goals of Industrial Strength SE  Consistently develop SW with high Q&P for large scale problems, under change  Q&P are the basic objectives to be achieved  Q&P governed by people, processes, and technology CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 30
  • 31. Iron Triangle CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 31
  • 32. Iron Triangle  What happens when you break the triangle?  1)The project gets canceled.  15% of projects are cancelled before they deliver a system.  A study of 1,027 IT projects cited scope management related to serial practices as the single largest contributing factor to project failure in 82% of the projects and was given a overall weighted failure influence of 25%. CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 32 www.ambysoft.com/essays/brokenTriangle.htm
  • 33. Iron Triangle  What happens when you break the triangle? 2)The Project is deliver late, over budget, or both  According to the Chaos Report 51% of projects are challenged (severely over budget and/or late), with an average cost overrun of 43%. CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 33 www.ambysoft.com/essays/brokenTriangle.htm
  • 34. Iron Triangle  What happens when you break the triangle? 3)The Project delivers poor quality software.  When development teams are forced to deliver more functionality than they have time or resources for, they are often motivated to take short cuts which inevitably result in poor quality. CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 34 www.ambysoft.com/essays/brokenTriangle.htm
  • 35. Iron Triangle  What happens when you break the triangle? 4)The project under delivers.  The team fails to deliver all of the required functionality. CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 35 www.ambysoft.com/essays/brokenTriangle.htm
  • 36. Iron Triangle…  What to do about it?  Recognize that the iron triangle must be respected.  So  Vary the Scope  Vary the Schedule  Vary the Resources  Vary two or more factors CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 36 www.ambysoft.com/essays/brokenTriangle.htm
  • 37. SE Methodology  SE focuses mostly on processes for achieving the goals  Process must be systematic  SE separates process for developing sw from the developed product (i.e the sw)  Premise: Process largely determines Q&P, hence suitable processes will lead to high Q&P CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 37
  • 38. SE Methodology…  Design of proper processes and their control is a key challenge SE faces  Sw process is the equivalent of manufacturing process  This focus on process makes SE different from many CS courses CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 38
  • 39. SE Methodology…  The development process used in SE is typically phased  Phases separate concerns with each phase focusing on some aspect  Requirements, architecture, design, coding, testing are key phases  This phased process has to be properly managed to achieve the objectives  Metrics and measurement important for this CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 39
  • 41. Summary  The problem domain for SE is industrial strength software  Software comprises programs, documentation, and data  SE aims to provide methods for systematically developing SW  Main goal – achieve high quality and productivity (Q&P) CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 41
  • 42. Summary…  Must have high Q&P with consistency in the context of large scale and frequent changes  Basic approach of SE is to separate process from products and focus on process and managing the process CS3130 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING – Summer 2011 42
  • 43. Other Processes 43 PROCESS MANAGEMENT PROCESS
  • 44. Background  A process is not a static entity – it has to change to improve to improve the Q&P  Focus of process management is to evaluate and improve the process  Is different from project management which focuses on a project  Process management is an advanced topic Other Processes 44
  • 45. Software Process Improvement  To improve the process, an org must understand the current process  Requires process be properly documented  Properly executed on projects  Data is collected from projects to understand the performance of process on projects  Changes to process are best made in small increments Other Processes 45
  • 46. Software Process Improvement Frameworks  What changes should be made to the process and when  Frameworks suggest ways of how process improvement can proceed  Capability Maturity Model (CMM) is one of the most common frameworks Other Processes 46
  • 47. CMM  CMM has five maturity levels for a software process (level 1 is ad-hoc)  In a level, process has some capabilities and lays the foundation for next level  For moving from one level to another, CMM specifies areas to focus on  Is used heavily by sw industry Other Processes 47
  • 48. CMM Other Processes 48 Note: • Student projects: CMM level 1 (ad hoc) • SW Engg. Course Project: CMM level 2
  • 49. Course Project Notes  Decide on roles and responsibilities  Possible Roles  Project management & Change management process  Web site, Charter & Feasibility Doc, SRS & Project Plan, Meeting minutes  Design Lead  High Level & Detailed Design Docs  Development Lead  Coordination of implementation efforts, system integration  Configuration Management Lead  Setup and management of version control and build system  Quality Assurance &Testing Lead  Test Docs, User manuals Software Process 49
  • 50. Course Project Notes  Set up the website and SVN (MS1)  Project Charter Doc (MS2)  Anchors a project helping the team avoid mid project drift.  Every project needs a charter! If the sponsor doesn't provide it, the development team should create one and get it approved!  See the Project Details document for templates. Software Process 50