SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 5
Download to read offline
David Cirillo is a student
at Rice University in
Houston, Texas, USA.
The opinions expressed in
this text are the
responsibility of the author
alone.
ISBN: 978-2-36567-593-2
© All rights reserved,
Paris, Ifri, 2016.
How to quote this
publication:
David Cirillo,
“The Taboo of the
Armenian Genocide,
Part One”, Repères sur
la Turquie, No. 14,
June 27, 2016.
Ifri
27 rue de la Procession
75740 Paris Cedex 15
Tél. : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 00
Email : accueil@ifri.org
Website:
www.ifri.org
Éditoriaux de l’Ifri
June 27, 2016
1
Repères sur la Turquie 14
The Taboo of the Armenian Genocide,
Part One
Global Reaction and American
Inaction
David CIRILLO
In the Syrian refugee crisis enveloping Europe, Turkey has become the
bottleneck toward which migrants are flowing into Europe, a factor
increasingly important for Germany in particular. Relations have been
strained, however, due to disputes over the possibility of lifting visa
requirements. By all odds, Germany should be treading lightly in its
relations with Turkey, seeing as it is in the midst of the largest influx of
migrants and refugees it has ever seen. Yet, as of June, 2016, Germany
decided to vote on the one issue that the Turkish government has
always denied and fought against: the Armenian genocide1. It was an
expected vote, on the docket of the Bundestag for months, and it passed.
It was first proposed by Chancellor Merkel’s Christian Democratic
Union more than a year ago.
Perhaps its passage was such a surprise because of the storied histories
of similar measures with other allies of Turkey, such as the United
States. In 2008, then-candidate Barack Obama made a campaign
promise to acknowledge the Armenian genocide as a genocide if he were
to become president2. Eight years later, and there has been no official
recognition. Germany’s vote was a culmination of domestic and global
political dynamics as well as a product of timing. The United States had
similar timing to Germany, with the 100th anniversary of the genocide
occurring in 2015, yet did not act on it; as President Obama’s term ends,
questions loom around such inaction, the possible action of his
successor, and the underlying political forces driving America’s
response or lack thereof.
The Taboo of the Armenian Genocide, Part One David CirilloRepères sur la Turquie
2
14
International Recognition and Repercussions
Germany became the 27th country in the world to officially
acknowledge the Armenian genocide on June 2nd of 20163. This
important declaration acknowledges the genocidal massacre of an
estimated 800,000 Armenians by the Ottoman Empire in 1915 (with
most reports varying from 500,000 to 1,500,000 killed), a position
denied by modern Turkey since the Republic was founded4 . Its
recognition by nationally representative bodies such as the
Bundestag pits German recognition against official Turkish accounts.
Merkel herself signified support for the measure via her vote in favor
during a preliminary straw poll held by the CDU5. She was not
present during the actual vote due to scheduling conflicts, but also,
perhaps, in an effort to avoid further confrontation with Turkey on an
individualistic level. The Turkish Ambassador to Germany, Hüseyin
Avni Karslıoğlu, was immediately sent back to Ankara for
consultations, a step Turkey is known to take after countries
recognize the genocide, having done as such to France, Italy, Austria,
Brazil, and even countries considering it, such as the United States in
20106. However, Prime Minister Binali Yıldırım released a statement,
“Turkey and Germany are two important allies. No one should expect
a full worsening of our relationship with Germany because of this
kind of a decision. But this does not mean that Turkey will remain
indifferent and silent against such a move”, signaling a lesser penalty
despite the need for some sort of response7. Germany is the largest
foreign investor in Turkey, and in 2015, Turkey exported over
14 billion euros worth of goods to Germany, meaning a break could
hurt both countries8. On June 8th, Turkish official Ibrahim Kalin
confirmed that Turkey is “preparing an action plan” against Germany
via the foreign ministry9. The plan itself has yet to be revealed, but
there are signs of small-scale retaliation; on June 23rd, Ankara
officially restricted German members of parliament from visiting
Incirlik airbase in Turkey, where over 250 German soldiers are
located10.
The plan could consist of severing diplomatic ties, ending bilateral or
international cooperation agreements, or halting projects and
German land contracts in Turkey. When France passed a law
proclaiming it a crime to deny the Armenian genocide, Turkey
recalled its ambassador, cut off all bilateral and international
The Taboo of the Armenian Genocide, Part One David CirilloRepères sur la Turquie
3
14
cooperation contracts, and put an end to military contracts as well as
French use of Turkish naval ports and airspace11. Although possible
with Germany, this would prove increasingly complicated due to
NATO operations and bilateral agreements involving both operations
against the Islamic State with German tornado aircrafts and in
halting migration from Turkey to Greece. Turkey is also invested in
the almost three million German residents with Turkish origin,
lessening attempts at formal Turkish retaliation12. Specific sects of
the same population have staged protests and threatened members of
parliament who voted for the resolution. If such formal measures are
taken, however, the results could prove dangerous for Germany and
the entire EU, as well as possibly for Turkey.
The Politics of American Recognition
Perhaps similar retaliation, as well as the fight against bodies such as
the Islamic State, is what has stalled the United States from
recognizing the genocide over 101 years later. In a 2015 survey by
Zogby Analytics, a plurality of Americans who were aware of the
Armenian genocide were in favor of the United States calling “on
Turkey to publicly admit the Armenian genocide”, while a plurality,
albeit at 39%, agreed that the United States should release a
resolution in recognition of the genocide13. In both of these questions,
the second highest answer was not a rejection, but indecision, stating,
“I don’t know”14 . A plurality of Americans already aware of the
Armenian massacres believes it to be genocide and that America
should act on it. Furthermore, there are estimated accounts of more
than one million Armenians in the United States, second only to
Russia in number15. And yet, the government has not acted in such a
manner. This being said, a majority of Americans aren’t even
informed on the genocide, according to the same survey. Therefore, it
seems as if, despite there being a constituency and plurality on which
to act, the government also has a majority that is ignorant to the
matter. The genocide being on the backburner in Congress and for
the President, therefore, isn’t as large a political issue for most groups.
Despite this lack of widespread knowledge, the Armenian genocide
has been brought up again and again, on the local, state, and federal
level. In 2007, while over two hundred members of the House of
Representatives supported and even sponsored a bill recognizing the
Armenian genocide, many abandoned it, leaving it to fail before it
The Taboo of the Armenian Genocide, Part One David CirilloRepères sur la Turquie
4
14
could even be voted on16. Then-Senator Obama agreed with such
sentiments, stating, “For those who aren’t aware there was a genocide
that did take place against the Armenian people. It is one of these
situations where we have seen a constant denial on part of the
Turkish Government and others that this occurred,”17. In 2010, the
House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee, a preliminary
committee in Congress made up of selected specified representatives
in order to allow bills to move toward a full vote, voted in favor of the
resolution18. There are forces in play in American politics that are
both pushing such measures to the national forefront, but also
making them ultimately fail at the finish line. As goes representative
democracy, there are political action and interest groups that have
powerful sway. In regard to the Armenian genocide, these groups
tend to be the Armenian lobbies, Turkish interest groups, and Israeli
action groups. And they get results. The methods differ between
lobbying via Americanized grassroots organizations, results of the
diaspora, and direct foreign government lobbying. The former is a
method more associated with Armenia, the latter with Turkey. As
both lobbies play the game of American politics, how will the pieces
fall? America is a diverse nation, with many Armenians and Turks
and various other nationalities represented in its patchwork, and yet
this politik surrounding recognition tends to end the same way time
and time again. Why? Surely ask the politicians, but don’t forget
about the lobbies.
1 . Amtliches Protokoll, “173. Sitzung des Deutschen Bundestages am Donnerstag”,
Deustcher Bundestag, June 2nd, 2016, available at: www.bundestag.de.
2. J. Hudson, “Despite Campaign Pledge, Obama Won’t Call 1915 Killings of Armenians
‘Genocide’”, Foreign Policy, April 21, 2015, available at: http://foreignpolicy.com.
3 . R. Hackwill, “Germany Becomes 27th Nation to Recognise Armenian Genocide”,
Euronews, June 2nd, 2016, available at: www.euronews.com.
4. D. Melvin, “8 Things to Know About the Mass Killings of Armenians 100 Years Ago”,
CNN, April 27, 2015, available at: http://edition.cnn.com.
5 . P. Carrel, “Merkel to Skip Disputed German Vote on Armenian Killings”,
Reuters¸June 1st, 2016, available at: http://uk.reuters.com.
6 . D. Nasaw, “Turkey Recalls US Ambassador Over Armenia Genocide Resolution”,
The Guardian, March 5, 2010, available at: www.theguardian.com.
7. “Turkey Values Germany Ties Despite Armenian ‘Genocide’ Row”, BBC, June 3rd, 2016,
available at: www.bbc.com.
8. J. Hill, “German Genocide Vote Inflames Tensions with Turkey”, BBC, June 10, 2016,
available at: www.bbc.com.
9. J. Delcker, “Bundestag Urges Angela Merkel to Stand Up to Turkey”, Politico, June 8,
2016, available at: www.politico.eu.
The Taboo of the Armenian Genocide, Part One David CirilloRepères sur la Turquie
5
14
10. “Turkey ‘Blocking’ German MPs’ visit to Incirlik Air Base”, BBC, June 22, 2016,
available at: www.bbc.com.
11. R. Connor, “Turkey Announces Sanctions Against France Over Genocide Bill”, Deutsche
Welle, December 22, 2011, available at: www.dw.com.
12. More details at: www.destatis.de.
13. H. Sassounian, “Only 35% of Americans Are Aware There Was an Armenian Genocide”,
The Californian Courrier, November 17, 2015, available at: www.thecaliforniacourier.com.
14. Ibid.
15 . E. Y. Azadian, “Commentary: A Million Person March on Washington”, Armenian
Mirror-Spectator, available at: www.accc.org.uk.
16 . R. Simon, “Genocide Resolution’s Support Starts to Fade”, Los Angeles Times,
October 17, 2007, available at: http://articles.latimes.com.
17. “Barack Obama’s Track Record of Armenian Genocide Recognition”, Armenian National
Committee of America (ANCA), available at: https://anca.org.
18. N. Mozgavaya News Agency, “Turkey Recalls Ambassador From Washington”, Haaretz,
June 27, 2016, available at: www.haaretz.com.

More Related Content

What's hot

Du bow digest germany edition may 8, 2012 a
Du bow digest germany edition may 8, 2012 aDu bow digest germany edition may 8, 2012 a
Du bow digest germany edition may 8, 2012 adubowdigest
 
TheCaseforMilitaryAidtoIsrael
TheCaseforMilitaryAidtoIsraelTheCaseforMilitaryAidtoIsrael
TheCaseforMilitaryAidtoIsraelJoseph Laughon
 
Will Hurd wikipedia (highlighted)
Will Hurd   wikipedia (highlighted)Will Hurd   wikipedia (highlighted)
Will Hurd wikipedia (highlighted)VogelDenise
 
THE DISASTROUS AND ANTIDEMOCRATIC DONALD TRUMP GOVERNMENT
THE DISASTROUS AND ANTIDEMOCRATIC DONALD TRUMP  GOVERNMENT THE DISASTROUS AND ANTIDEMOCRATIC DONALD TRUMP  GOVERNMENT
THE DISASTROUS AND ANTIDEMOCRATIC DONALD TRUMP GOVERNMENT Fernando Alcoforado
 
The Ethics of Trump's Refugee Ban
The Ethics of Trump's Refugee Ban The Ethics of Trump's Refugee Ban
The Ethics of Trump's Refugee Ban S Henry
 
Iran in Latin America: Threat or 'Axis of Annoyance'?
Iran in Latin America: Threat or 'Axis of Annoyance'? Iran in Latin America: Threat or 'Axis of Annoyance'?
Iran in Latin America: Threat or 'Axis of Annoyance'? Felix Maradiaga
 
Trump’s pox americana | foreign policy
Trump’s pox americana | foreign policyTrump’s pox americana | foreign policy
Trump’s pox americana | foreign policyCarlo Favaretti
 
Du bow digest american edition feb. 20, 2011
Du bow digest american edition feb. 20, 2011Du bow digest american edition feb. 20, 2011
Du bow digest american edition feb. 20, 2011dubowdigest
 
Commonsense Political Thinking Book 8 2013 examiner complete
Commonsense Political Thinking Book 8 2013 examiner completeCommonsense Political Thinking Book 8 2013 examiner complete
Commonsense Political Thinking Book 8 2013 examiner completeGerald Furnkranz
 
Trump on-china-putting-america-first
Trump on-china-putting-america-firstTrump on-china-putting-america-first
Trump on-china-putting-america-first中 央社
 
final-presidential-debate
final-presidential-debatefinal-presidential-debate
final-presidential-debateEmily Drewry
 
[Final] nstf report
[Final] nstf report[Final] nstf report
[Final] nstf reportBabelNews
 
Will The U.S. Split Into One or More Countries?
Will The U.S. Split Into One or More Countries?Will The U.S. Split Into One or More Countries?
Will The U.S. Split Into One or More Countries?Bruce LaCour
 
Keefe, katherine assignment #1 final draft
Keefe, katherine assignment #1 final draftKeefe, katherine assignment #1 final draft
Keefe, katherine assignment #1 final draftkatiekf3
 

What's hot (20)

Mortensen letter
Mortensen letterMortensen letter
Mortensen letter
 
Du bow digest germany edition may 8, 2012 a
Du bow digest germany edition may 8, 2012 aDu bow digest germany edition may 8, 2012 a
Du bow digest germany edition may 8, 2012 a
 
TheCaseforMilitaryAidtoIsrael
TheCaseforMilitaryAidtoIsraelTheCaseforMilitaryAidtoIsrael
TheCaseforMilitaryAidtoIsrael
 
Fys research paper
Fys research paperFys research paper
Fys research paper
 
Will Hurd wikipedia (highlighted)
Will Hurd   wikipedia (highlighted)Will Hurd   wikipedia (highlighted)
Will Hurd wikipedia (highlighted)
 
THE DISASTROUS AND ANTIDEMOCRATIC DONALD TRUMP GOVERNMENT
THE DISASTROUS AND ANTIDEMOCRATIC DONALD TRUMP  GOVERNMENT THE DISASTROUS AND ANTIDEMOCRATIC DONALD TRUMP  GOVERNMENT
THE DISASTROUS AND ANTIDEMOCRATIC DONALD TRUMP GOVERNMENT
 
The Ethics of Trump's Refugee Ban
The Ethics of Trump's Refugee Ban The Ethics of Trump's Refugee Ban
The Ethics of Trump's Refugee Ban
 
Donald trump slideshow
Donald trump slideshowDonald trump slideshow
Donald trump slideshow
 
A Jewish Scorecard: Trump vs. Sanders
A Jewish Scorecard: Trump vs. SandersA Jewish Scorecard: Trump vs. Sanders
A Jewish Scorecard: Trump vs. Sanders
 
Iran in Latin America: Threat or 'Axis of Annoyance'?
Iran in Latin America: Threat or 'Axis of Annoyance'? Iran in Latin America: Threat or 'Axis of Annoyance'?
Iran in Latin America: Threat or 'Axis of Annoyance'?
 
Trump’s pox americana | foreign policy
Trump’s pox americana | foreign policyTrump’s pox americana | foreign policy
Trump’s pox americana | foreign policy
 
Du bow digest american edition feb. 20, 2011
Du bow digest american edition feb. 20, 2011Du bow digest american edition feb. 20, 2011
Du bow digest american edition feb. 20, 2011
 
BIG BROTHER
BIG BROTHERBIG BROTHER
BIG BROTHER
 
Commonsense Political Thinking Book 8 2013 examiner complete
Commonsense Political Thinking Book 8 2013 examiner completeCommonsense Political Thinking Book 8 2013 examiner complete
Commonsense Political Thinking Book 8 2013 examiner complete
 
WORDLPEACEfdu
WORDLPEACEfduWORDLPEACEfdu
WORDLPEACEfdu
 
Trump on-china-putting-america-first
Trump on-china-putting-america-firstTrump on-china-putting-america-first
Trump on-china-putting-america-first
 
final-presidential-debate
final-presidential-debatefinal-presidential-debate
final-presidential-debate
 
[Final] nstf report
[Final] nstf report[Final] nstf report
[Final] nstf report
 
Will The U.S. Split Into One or More Countries?
Will The U.S. Split Into One or More Countries?Will The U.S. Split Into One or More Countries?
Will The U.S. Split Into One or More Countries?
 
Keefe, katherine assignment #1 final draft
Keefe, katherine assignment #1 final draftKeefe, katherine assignment #1 final draft
Keefe, katherine assignment #1 final draft
 

Similar to american_avoidance_1_revusl_0

The battle Against Credit Card Fraud: Cooperation between Airlines and Law En...
The battle Against Credit Card Fraud: Cooperation between Airlines and Law En...The battle Against Credit Card Fraud: Cooperation between Airlines and Law En...
The battle Against Credit Card Fraud: Cooperation between Airlines and Law En...Shalini Levens
 
An Analysis Of Refugee Rights And Human Security A Case Study Of Germany
An Analysis Of Refugee Rights And Human Security  A Case Study Of GermanyAn Analysis Of Refugee Rights And Human Security  A Case Study Of Germany
An Analysis Of Refugee Rights And Human Security A Case Study Of GermanyCheryl Brown
 
Du bow digest germany edition nov. 23, 2010
Du bow digest germany edition nov. 23, 2010Du bow digest germany edition nov. 23, 2010
Du bow digest germany edition nov. 23, 2010dubowdigest
 
Du bow digestgermany edition jan. 10, 2011
Du bow digestgermany edition jan. 10, 2011Du bow digestgermany edition jan. 10, 2011
Du bow digestgermany edition jan. 10, 2011dubowdigest
 
Kevin_C_Wright_Final_Paper
Kevin_C_Wright_Final_PaperKevin_C_Wright_Final_Paper
Kevin_C_Wright_Final_PaperKevin Wright
 
Du Bow Digest American Edition dec. 12, 2012
Du Bow Digest American Edition dec. 12, 2012Du Bow Digest American Edition dec. 12, 2012
Du Bow Digest American Edition dec. 12, 2012dubowdigest
 
Part 1: The end of liberal democracies with brexit and the trump administration
Part 1: The end of liberal democracies with brexit and the trump administrationPart 1: The end of liberal democracies with brexit and the trump administration
Part 1: The end of liberal democracies with brexit and the trump administrationAlan Kin Him Ng
 
DuBow Digest American Edition July 2014
DuBow Digest American Edition July 2014DuBow Digest American Edition July 2014
DuBow Digest American Edition July 2014dubowdigest
 
Most common mistakes 3 e4 16 17
Most common mistakes 3 e4 16 17Most common mistakes 3 e4 16 17
Most common mistakes 3 e4 16 17jeanphilippeguy
 
GLC Human Security Policy Brief
GLC Human Security Policy BriefGLC Human Security Policy Brief
GLC Human Security Policy BriefEmma Perrin
 
DuBow Digest American Edition march 6, 2013 a
DuBow Digest American Edition march 6, 2013 aDuBow Digest American Edition march 6, 2013 a
DuBow Digest American Edition march 6, 2013 adubowdigest
 
The politics of immigration-dissertation
The politics of immigration-dissertationThe politics of immigration-dissertation
The politics of immigration-dissertationSamuel Skipper
 
Du bow digest germany edition september 8, 2011
Du bow digest germany edition september 8, 2011Du bow digest germany edition september 8, 2011
Du bow digest germany edition september 8, 2011dubowdigest
 
Brittany S CulverSeptember 14, 2016A Man’s Obsession wi.docx
Brittany S CulverSeptember 14, 2016A Man’s Obsession wi.docxBrittany S CulverSeptember 14, 2016A Man’s Obsession wi.docx
Brittany S CulverSeptember 14, 2016A Man’s Obsession wi.docxAASTHA76
 
Du Bow digestamerican edition july 29, 2011
Du Bow digestamerican edition july 29, 2011Du Bow digestamerican edition july 29, 2011
Du Bow digestamerican edition july 29, 2011dubowdigest
 

Similar to american_avoidance_1_revusl_0 (17)

The battle Against Credit Card Fraud: Cooperation between Airlines and Law En...
The battle Against Credit Card Fraud: Cooperation between Airlines and Law En...The battle Against Credit Card Fraud: Cooperation between Airlines and Law En...
The battle Against Credit Card Fraud: Cooperation between Airlines and Law En...
 
An Analysis Of Refugee Rights And Human Security A Case Study Of Germany
An Analysis Of Refugee Rights And Human Security  A Case Study Of GermanyAn Analysis Of Refugee Rights And Human Security  A Case Study Of Germany
An Analysis Of Refugee Rights And Human Security A Case Study Of Germany
 
Du bow digest germany edition nov. 23, 2010
Du bow digest germany edition nov. 23, 2010Du bow digest germany edition nov. 23, 2010
Du bow digest germany edition nov. 23, 2010
 
Du bow digestgermany edition jan. 10, 2011
Du bow digestgermany edition jan. 10, 2011Du bow digestgermany edition jan. 10, 2011
Du bow digestgermany edition jan. 10, 2011
 
Kevin_C_Wright_Final_Paper
Kevin_C_Wright_Final_PaperKevin_C_Wright_Final_Paper
Kevin_C_Wright_Final_Paper
 
Du Bow Digest American Edition dec. 12, 2012
Du Bow Digest American Edition dec. 12, 2012Du Bow Digest American Edition dec. 12, 2012
Du Bow Digest American Edition dec. 12, 2012
 
Part 1: The end of liberal democracies with brexit and the trump administration
Part 1: The end of liberal democracies with brexit and the trump administrationPart 1: The end of liberal democracies with brexit and the trump administration
Part 1: The end of liberal democracies with brexit and the trump administration
 
Trump threat to world peace
Trump threat to world peaceTrump threat to world peace
Trump threat to world peace
 
DuBow Digest American Edition July 2014
DuBow Digest American Edition July 2014DuBow Digest American Edition July 2014
DuBow Digest American Edition July 2014
 
Most common mistakes 3 e4 16 17
Most common mistakes 3 e4 16 17Most common mistakes 3 e4 16 17
Most common mistakes 3 e4 16 17
 
Essays On Genocide
Essays On GenocideEssays On Genocide
Essays On Genocide
 
GLC Human Security Policy Brief
GLC Human Security Policy BriefGLC Human Security Policy Brief
GLC Human Security Policy Brief
 
DuBow Digest American Edition march 6, 2013 a
DuBow Digest American Edition march 6, 2013 aDuBow Digest American Edition march 6, 2013 a
DuBow Digest American Edition march 6, 2013 a
 
The politics of immigration-dissertation
The politics of immigration-dissertationThe politics of immigration-dissertation
The politics of immigration-dissertation
 
Du bow digest germany edition september 8, 2011
Du bow digest germany edition september 8, 2011Du bow digest germany edition september 8, 2011
Du bow digest germany edition september 8, 2011
 
Brittany S CulverSeptember 14, 2016A Man’s Obsession wi.docx
Brittany S CulverSeptember 14, 2016A Man’s Obsession wi.docxBrittany S CulverSeptember 14, 2016A Man’s Obsession wi.docx
Brittany S CulverSeptember 14, 2016A Man’s Obsession wi.docx
 
Du Bow digestamerican edition july 29, 2011
Du Bow digestamerican edition july 29, 2011Du Bow digestamerican edition july 29, 2011
Du Bow digestamerican edition july 29, 2011
 

american_avoidance_1_revusl_0

  • 1. David Cirillo is a student at Rice University in Houston, Texas, USA. The opinions expressed in this text are the responsibility of the author alone. ISBN: 978-2-36567-593-2 © All rights reserved, Paris, Ifri, 2016. How to quote this publication: David Cirillo, “The Taboo of the Armenian Genocide, Part One”, Repères sur la Turquie, No. 14, June 27, 2016. Ifri 27 rue de la Procession 75740 Paris Cedex 15 Tél. : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 00 Email : accueil@ifri.org Website: www.ifri.org Éditoriaux de l’Ifri June 27, 2016 1 Repères sur la Turquie 14 The Taboo of the Armenian Genocide, Part One Global Reaction and American Inaction David CIRILLO In the Syrian refugee crisis enveloping Europe, Turkey has become the bottleneck toward which migrants are flowing into Europe, a factor increasingly important for Germany in particular. Relations have been strained, however, due to disputes over the possibility of lifting visa requirements. By all odds, Germany should be treading lightly in its relations with Turkey, seeing as it is in the midst of the largest influx of migrants and refugees it has ever seen. Yet, as of June, 2016, Germany decided to vote on the one issue that the Turkish government has always denied and fought against: the Armenian genocide1. It was an expected vote, on the docket of the Bundestag for months, and it passed. It was first proposed by Chancellor Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union more than a year ago. Perhaps its passage was such a surprise because of the storied histories of similar measures with other allies of Turkey, such as the United States. In 2008, then-candidate Barack Obama made a campaign promise to acknowledge the Armenian genocide as a genocide if he were to become president2. Eight years later, and there has been no official recognition. Germany’s vote was a culmination of domestic and global political dynamics as well as a product of timing. The United States had similar timing to Germany, with the 100th anniversary of the genocide occurring in 2015, yet did not act on it; as President Obama’s term ends, questions loom around such inaction, the possible action of his successor, and the underlying political forces driving America’s response or lack thereof.
  • 2. The Taboo of the Armenian Genocide, Part One David CirilloRepères sur la Turquie 2 14 International Recognition and Repercussions Germany became the 27th country in the world to officially acknowledge the Armenian genocide on June 2nd of 20163. This important declaration acknowledges the genocidal massacre of an estimated 800,000 Armenians by the Ottoman Empire in 1915 (with most reports varying from 500,000 to 1,500,000 killed), a position denied by modern Turkey since the Republic was founded4 . Its recognition by nationally representative bodies such as the Bundestag pits German recognition against official Turkish accounts. Merkel herself signified support for the measure via her vote in favor during a preliminary straw poll held by the CDU5. She was not present during the actual vote due to scheduling conflicts, but also, perhaps, in an effort to avoid further confrontation with Turkey on an individualistic level. The Turkish Ambassador to Germany, Hüseyin Avni Karslıoğlu, was immediately sent back to Ankara for consultations, a step Turkey is known to take after countries recognize the genocide, having done as such to France, Italy, Austria, Brazil, and even countries considering it, such as the United States in 20106. However, Prime Minister Binali Yıldırım released a statement, “Turkey and Germany are two important allies. No one should expect a full worsening of our relationship with Germany because of this kind of a decision. But this does not mean that Turkey will remain indifferent and silent against such a move”, signaling a lesser penalty despite the need for some sort of response7. Germany is the largest foreign investor in Turkey, and in 2015, Turkey exported over 14 billion euros worth of goods to Germany, meaning a break could hurt both countries8. On June 8th, Turkish official Ibrahim Kalin confirmed that Turkey is “preparing an action plan” against Germany via the foreign ministry9. The plan itself has yet to be revealed, but there are signs of small-scale retaliation; on June 23rd, Ankara officially restricted German members of parliament from visiting Incirlik airbase in Turkey, where over 250 German soldiers are located10. The plan could consist of severing diplomatic ties, ending bilateral or international cooperation agreements, or halting projects and German land contracts in Turkey. When France passed a law proclaiming it a crime to deny the Armenian genocide, Turkey recalled its ambassador, cut off all bilateral and international
  • 3. The Taboo of the Armenian Genocide, Part One David CirilloRepères sur la Turquie 3 14 cooperation contracts, and put an end to military contracts as well as French use of Turkish naval ports and airspace11. Although possible with Germany, this would prove increasingly complicated due to NATO operations and bilateral agreements involving both operations against the Islamic State with German tornado aircrafts and in halting migration from Turkey to Greece. Turkey is also invested in the almost three million German residents with Turkish origin, lessening attempts at formal Turkish retaliation12. Specific sects of the same population have staged protests and threatened members of parliament who voted for the resolution. If such formal measures are taken, however, the results could prove dangerous for Germany and the entire EU, as well as possibly for Turkey. The Politics of American Recognition Perhaps similar retaliation, as well as the fight against bodies such as the Islamic State, is what has stalled the United States from recognizing the genocide over 101 years later. In a 2015 survey by Zogby Analytics, a plurality of Americans who were aware of the Armenian genocide were in favor of the United States calling “on Turkey to publicly admit the Armenian genocide”, while a plurality, albeit at 39%, agreed that the United States should release a resolution in recognition of the genocide13. In both of these questions, the second highest answer was not a rejection, but indecision, stating, “I don’t know”14 . A plurality of Americans already aware of the Armenian massacres believes it to be genocide and that America should act on it. Furthermore, there are estimated accounts of more than one million Armenians in the United States, second only to Russia in number15. And yet, the government has not acted in such a manner. This being said, a majority of Americans aren’t even informed on the genocide, according to the same survey. Therefore, it seems as if, despite there being a constituency and plurality on which to act, the government also has a majority that is ignorant to the matter. The genocide being on the backburner in Congress and for the President, therefore, isn’t as large a political issue for most groups. Despite this lack of widespread knowledge, the Armenian genocide has been brought up again and again, on the local, state, and federal level. In 2007, while over two hundred members of the House of Representatives supported and even sponsored a bill recognizing the Armenian genocide, many abandoned it, leaving it to fail before it
  • 4. The Taboo of the Armenian Genocide, Part One David CirilloRepères sur la Turquie 4 14 could even be voted on16. Then-Senator Obama agreed with such sentiments, stating, “For those who aren’t aware there was a genocide that did take place against the Armenian people. It is one of these situations where we have seen a constant denial on part of the Turkish Government and others that this occurred,”17. In 2010, the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee, a preliminary committee in Congress made up of selected specified representatives in order to allow bills to move toward a full vote, voted in favor of the resolution18. There are forces in play in American politics that are both pushing such measures to the national forefront, but also making them ultimately fail at the finish line. As goes representative democracy, there are political action and interest groups that have powerful sway. In regard to the Armenian genocide, these groups tend to be the Armenian lobbies, Turkish interest groups, and Israeli action groups. And they get results. The methods differ between lobbying via Americanized grassroots organizations, results of the diaspora, and direct foreign government lobbying. The former is a method more associated with Armenia, the latter with Turkey. As both lobbies play the game of American politics, how will the pieces fall? America is a diverse nation, with many Armenians and Turks and various other nationalities represented in its patchwork, and yet this politik surrounding recognition tends to end the same way time and time again. Why? Surely ask the politicians, but don’t forget about the lobbies. 1 . Amtliches Protokoll, “173. Sitzung des Deutschen Bundestages am Donnerstag”, Deustcher Bundestag, June 2nd, 2016, available at: www.bundestag.de. 2. J. Hudson, “Despite Campaign Pledge, Obama Won’t Call 1915 Killings of Armenians ‘Genocide’”, Foreign Policy, April 21, 2015, available at: http://foreignpolicy.com. 3 . R. Hackwill, “Germany Becomes 27th Nation to Recognise Armenian Genocide”, Euronews, June 2nd, 2016, available at: www.euronews.com. 4. D. Melvin, “8 Things to Know About the Mass Killings of Armenians 100 Years Ago”, CNN, April 27, 2015, available at: http://edition.cnn.com. 5 . P. Carrel, “Merkel to Skip Disputed German Vote on Armenian Killings”, Reuters¸June 1st, 2016, available at: http://uk.reuters.com. 6 . D. Nasaw, “Turkey Recalls US Ambassador Over Armenia Genocide Resolution”, The Guardian, March 5, 2010, available at: www.theguardian.com. 7. “Turkey Values Germany Ties Despite Armenian ‘Genocide’ Row”, BBC, June 3rd, 2016, available at: www.bbc.com. 8. J. Hill, “German Genocide Vote Inflames Tensions with Turkey”, BBC, June 10, 2016, available at: www.bbc.com. 9. J. Delcker, “Bundestag Urges Angela Merkel to Stand Up to Turkey”, Politico, June 8, 2016, available at: www.politico.eu.
  • 5. The Taboo of the Armenian Genocide, Part One David CirilloRepères sur la Turquie 5 14 10. “Turkey ‘Blocking’ German MPs’ visit to Incirlik Air Base”, BBC, June 22, 2016, available at: www.bbc.com. 11. R. Connor, “Turkey Announces Sanctions Against France Over Genocide Bill”, Deutsche Welle, December 22, 2011, available at: www.dw.com. 12. More details at: www.destatis.de. 13. H. Sassounian, “Only 35% of Americans Are Aware There Was an Armenian Genocide”, The Californian Courrier, November 17, 2015, available at: www.thecaliforniacourier.com. 14. Ibid. 15 . E. Y. Azadian, “Commentary: A Million Person March on Washington”, Armenian Mirror-Spectator, available at: www.accc.org.uk. 16 . R. Simon, “Genocide Resolution’s Support Starts to Fade”, Los Angeles Times, October 17, 2007, available at: http://articles.latimes.com. 17. “Barack Obama’s Track Record of Armenian Genocide Recognition”, Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA), available at: https://anca.org. 18. N. Mozgavaya News Agency, “Turkey Recalls Ambassador From Washington”, Haaretz, June 27, 2016, available at: www.haaretz.com.