Zompiconsolidadointernationaowipo

1
http://www.totalplaycolombia.com http://www.totalplay.com.co
http://www.totalplay.store
TOTALPLAY SAS NIT 900.603.020-0 Carrera 34 # 47-23 Oficina #1. Barranquilla.
Atlántico. Colombia. Email: totalplaycolombia@outlook.com
info@totalplaycolombia.com totalplaycolombia@gmail.com Celulares: 57-
3043878883 57-3023606508 57-3207953622
Barranquilla, Colombia. 04 de Junio de 2017
DOCTOR: FRANCISCO REYES VILLAMIZAR
PRESIDENTE UNCITRAL (CNUDMI)
SUPERINTENDENTE DE SOCIEDADES DE COLOMBIA
BOGOTA D.C.
Dr. Stephen D. Crocker, Board Chair, Akram Atallah, Interim CEO
Cherine Chalaby, Chair, New gTLD Program Committee., John Jeffrey, General
Counsel Heather Dryden, Chair, Government Advisory Committee. Kurt Pritz, SVP
Stakeholder Relations and Acting Director of New gTLD Program Suzanne Sene,
U.S. Representative to ICANN Government Advisory Committee Dr. Olivier M.J.
Crépin-Leblond, Chair, ICANN At Large Advisory Committee Internet Corporation for
Assigned Names and Numbers 1101 New York Ave, NW, Suite 930 Washington, DC
20005 VIA EMAIL (steve.crocker@icann.org; akram.atallah@icann.org;
cherine.chalaby@icann.org; john.jeffrey@icann.org; heather.dryden@ic.gc.ca;
kurt.pritz@icann.org; ssene@ntia.doc.gov; ocl@gih.com)
Sr. António Guterres. PORTUGAL. SECRETARIO GENERAL DE LAS NACIONES
UNIDAS ONU toursunhq@un.org unitg@un.org inquiries2@un.org
briefings@un.org Nueva York, Estados Unidos United Nations Headquarters 1
United Nations Plaza New York N.Y. 10017 USA
Sr. Andrew G. McCabe Director en Funciones FBI.
FBI Headquarters 935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
(202) 324-3000 Por intermedio de la oficina FBI
De la embajada de Estados Unidos Señor Embajador Kevin Whitaker.
Señores: UNCITRAL Secretaría de la CNUDMI Centro Internacional de Viena
Apartado postal 500 A- 1400 Viena, Austria (Europa)
Teléfono: 43-(1) 26060-4060 ó 4061 Telefax: 43-(1) 26060-5813
uncitral@uncitral.org jenny.clift@uncitral.org
Señores: Interpol https://www.interpol.int/es/Internet
DIRECTOR INTERPOL Secretaría General de INTERPOL 200, Quai Charles de Gaulle
69006 Lyon (Francia) Fax: +33 4 72 44 71 63
Señores: Legal Force INC Atención RAJ ABHYANKER. ABOGADO TITULADO
CEO CALIFORNIA ESTADOS UNIDOS. raj@legalforcelaw.com
SEÑOR: LUIS ANGEL AVENDAÑO CORTES ABOGADO TOTALPLAY SAS
negociosjudiciales@hotmail.com

2
DOCTOR: JUAN MANUEL SANTOS CALDERON
PRESIDENTE DE COLOMBIA
PRESIDENCIA DE LA REPUBLICA
CALLE 7 # 6-54 PALACIO DE NARIÑO
ATENCION: DOCTORA CLAUDIA ISABEL GONZALEZ SANCHEZ
SECRETARIA JURIDICA
PRESIDENCIA DE LA REPUBLICA DE COLOMBIA
DOCTOR: NESTOR HUMBERTO MARTINEZ NEIRA
FISCAL GENERAL DE LA COLOMBIA
BUNKER FISCALIA GENERAL DE LA NACION
BOGOTA D.C
Claudia.arambula@fiscalia.gov.co
derechosdepeticion@fiscalia.gov.co
DOCTOR: FERNANDO CARRILLO FLOREZ. PROCURADOR GENERAL DE LA
NACION. PROCURADURIA GENERAL DE LA NACION
BOGOTA D.C. procurador@procuraduria.gov.co quejas@procuraduria.gov.co
DOCTOR: PABLO FELIPE ROBLEDO DEL CASTILLO
SUPERINTENDENTE DE INDUSTRIA Y COMERCIO DE COLOMBIA
SUPERINTENDENCIA DE INDUSTRIA Y COMERCIO
BOGOTA D.C. contactenos@sic.gov.co superintendente@sic.gov.co
DOCTOR: DAVID LUNA
MINISTRO DE TECNOLOGIA DE LA INFORMACION Y COMUNICACIONES
MINTIC
DOCTOR: CARLOS ALFONSO NEGRET MOSQUERA
DEFENSOR DEL PUEBLO DE COLOMBIA
BOGOTA D.C. asuntosdefensor@defensoria.gov.co
DEFENSORIA REGIONAL ATLANTICO.
GENERAL JORGE HERNANDO NIETO ROJAS
DIRECTOR GENERAL. POLICIA NACIONAL DE COLOMBIA
POLICIA NACIONAL. BOGOTA D.C. segen.oac@policia.gov.co
BIRGADIER GENERAL: JORGE LUIS VARGAS VALENCIA
DIRECTOR INTERPOL COLOMBIA.
dijin.oac@policia.gov.co
DOCTORA: CARMEN TERESA CASTAÑEDA VILLAMIZAR
PERSONERA DE BOGOTA D.C.
PERSONERIA DE BOGOTA.
CORTE INTERAMERICANA DE DERECHOS HUMANOS CIDH COMUNIDAD ANDINA
ASUNTO: DENUNCIA PENAL Y DEMANDA COMERCIAL INTERNACIONAL CONTRA
LA ORGANIZACIÓN MUNDIAL DE PROPIEDAD INDUSTRIAL OMPI Y CONTRA
FRANCIS GURRY DIRECTOR DE LA OMPI, PABLO PALAZZI PRESIDENTE DEL
PANEL DELIVERATORIO DEL CASO No. D2012-2533, ALVARO LOUREIRO OLIVEIRA
PANELISTA CASO No. D2012-2533 Y DAVID W. QUINTO PANELISTA CASONo. 2012-
2533 WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center Y BLAKE J IRVING CEO GO DADDY INC
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION TV Azteca S.A.B. de C.V. v. Johny Romero (aka
Johny Alfonso Romero Rocha)/ Total Play Inc. Solicitud de Nulidad y devolución de
los nombres de Dominios total-play.com y total-play.co a la Sociedad TOTALPLAY
SAS NIT 900.603.020-0 de Colombia. El panel decidió sin tener certeza más allá de
toda duda razonable y en presunta complicidad con los demandantes y el abogado
de la parte demandante. SOLICITUD DE CIRCULARES AZULES INTERPOL.
Johny Alfonso Romero Rocha identificado con Cedula de Ciudadanía No. 72.200.057
expedida por COLOMBIA, Pasaporte No. AM 852285 Expedido por la Oficina de

3
Pasaportes Bogotá D.C. Calle 100 Colombia vigente hasta el 7 de Agosto de 2021,
Ingeniero Químico, Magister en Ingeniería Industrial con 20 años experiencia profesional
y empresarial pública y privada y docencia universitaria pública y privada, sin ningún tipo
de antecedentes penales, disciplinarios, fiscales por lavados de activos, por narcotráfico,
actuando en esta DENUNCIA Y DEMANDA en Calidad de Representante Legal de
TOTALPLAY SAS PYME Colombiana identificada con NIT 900.603.020-0 y Colombian
Sweeper Company PYME Colombiana identificada con NIT 900.360.752-9 y Actuando en
Calidad de Persona Natural Ciudadano en Ejercicio Colombiano , estando dentro de los
términos legales mediante el presente Memorial presento ante sus despachos DENUNCIA
PENAL Y DEMANDA COMERCIAL INTERNACIONAL CONTRA LA ORGANIZACIÓN
MUNDIAL DE PROPIEDAD INDUSTRIAL OMPI Y CONTRA FRANCIS GURRY
DIRECTOR DE LA OMPI, PABLO PALAZZI PRESIDENTE DEL PANEL
DELIVERATORIO DEL CASO No. D2012-2533, ALVARO LOUREIRO OLIVEIRA
PANELISTA CASO No. D2012-2533 Y DAVID W. QUINTO PANELISTA CASO No. 2012-
2533 WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION TV Azteca S.A.B. de C.V. v. Johny Romero (aka
Johny Alfonso Romero Rocha)/ Total Play Inc. Solicitud de Nulidad y devolución de
los nombres de Dominios total-play.com y total-play.co a la Sociedad TOTALPLAY
SAS NIT 900.603.020-0 de Colombia. La presente denuncia y demanda se presenta
en base a los siguientes fundamentos de Derechos y Hechos.
FUNDAMENTOS DE DERECHOS
1) Declaración universal de los derechos humanos y del hombre
2) Convenio de Paris de Propiedad Industrial
3) Acuerdos modificatorios del Convenio de Paris
4) Normas para solución de controversias de nombres de dominio
5) Constitución política de Colombia
6) Acuerdo de Cartagena
7) Leyes y circulares de la Organización Mundial de Comercio OMC
8) Decisión 486 de 2000 de la Comunidad Andina de Naciones.
9) Regulaciones policivas y de investigación internacionales.
10) Decreto 216 del 2010 y la Resolución 319 del 2010
11) Ley 1670 del 2013
12) Corte Suprema de Justicia Sala Penal, Sentencia 12222016 (83545)
HECHOS.
1) Que posterior a una Serie de Denuncias y Demandas en Contra de las Sociedades
Mexicanas TV AZTECA SAB DE CV MEXICO , TOTAL PLAY
TELECOMUNICACIONES SA DE CV de MEXICO, AZTECA COMUNICACIONES
COLOMBIA SAS Identificada con NIT 900548102-0, En fecha 30 de Noviembre
de 2016 Mediante acuerdo Conciliatorio en los numerales 1.3, 1.4 , 1.5, 1.6 y 1.7
las empresas del GRUPO SALINAS reconocieron los derechos de TOTAL PLAY
INC Y TOTALPLAY SAS sobre las marcas identificadas en signo Distintivo
TOTALPLAY Nominativa y mixta con los Certificado 467274 Clase 25 NIZA
Expediente 11-180437 de la Republica de Colombia y Certificado 467273 Clase 25
NIZA Expediente 12-061444 de la Republica de C0lombia y de igual forma
reconoció los derechos sobre el NOMBRE COMERCIAL TOTALPLAY Clase 25
NIZA identificado con el Deposito de Nombre Comercial No. 20718 Expediente 11-
180443 de la Republica de Colombia, Anexo Acuerdo de Conciliación que es parte
integrante de la presente DENUNCIA y DEMANDA. En relación al Nombre
Comercial las empresas del Grupo Salinas Expresaron numeral 1.7 dado que la
existencia del derecho sobre un nombre comercial se da por el uso público y
continuo y no por el registro del mismo ante la superintendencia de industria y
comercio de Colombia. TV AZTECA, TOTAL PLAY TELCO Y AZTECA aceptan
cualquier decisión emitida por cualquier entidad administrativa o judicial sobre la
existencia o no del nombre comercial indicado en el numeral 1.5 del presente
acuerdo. El numeral 1.5 reza TOTAL PLAY INC, ha licenciado las marcas
TOTALPLAY en la clase 25 indicadas en el presente acuerdo, a la sociedad
TOTALPLAY SAS, licencia que TV AZTECA, TOTAL PLAY TELCO Y AZTECA
reconocen como valida.

12
2) De tal forma que la SUPERINTENDENCIA DE INDUSTRIA Y COMERCIO DE
COLOMBIA mediante inscripciones de transferencias de signos distintivos en fecha
8 de Febrero de 2017, reconoció la Titularidad de TOTALPLAY SAS en las marcas
y nombres comerciales reconocidos por Grupo salinas ASI:

15
Y la oficina de Marcas y Patentes de los Estados Unidos de Norteamérica así en fecha 14
de Enero de 2017:

16
3) Que la empresas del GRUPO SALINAS DE MEXICO TV AZTECA SAB DE CV ,
TOTAL PLAY TELECOMUNICACIONES SA DE CV y AZTECA
COMUNICACIONES COLOMBIA, al reconocer los derechos de TOTAL PLAY INC
y TOTALPLAY SAS sobre las marcas TOTALPLAY nominativa y mixta Clase 25 en
la República de Colombia y el Nombre Comercial TOTALPLAY clase 25 de NIZA ,

17
dejan sin asidero legal y técnico las decisiones ilegales y erróneas expedidas por
el Panel Conformado por PABLO PALAZZI, ALVARO LOUREIRO OLIVEIRA Y
DAVID W QUINTO quienes presuntamente en complicidad con el Abogado
Colombiano EDUARDO SECONDO VARELA PEZZANO, decidieron concluir en su
momento que la Corporación Americana TOTAL PLAY INC no tenía derechos sobre
las marcas y nombres comerciales TOTALPLAY en Estados Unidos y Colombia
porque el Titular que aparecía en el registro era GRIPGUARD INC, violando
claramente los artículos 10 y 12 del procedimiento para la resolución de nombres
de conflictos de la OMPI lo cual se explica así,
4) En la sentencia o resolución no se tuvo en cuenta el hecho de que la corporación
GRIPGUARD INC. Es la misma corporación que TOTAL PLAY INC., Y el panel de
expertos administrativos no aplicó el mismo conjunto de reglas o regulaciones que
rigen este procedimiento, tales como Como artículo 12, que dice: “Además de la
demanda y el escrito de contestación, el grupo de expertos, de conformidad con sus
facultades legales, podría solicitar otras declaraciones o documentos de cualquiera
de las partes" sin embargo no lo hizo para poder decidir más allá de toda duda
razonable.
Y el mismo reglamento, como parte de las facultades otorgadas, permite al
Grupo de expertos prorrogar los plazos fijados en el mismo (artículo 10). Esto
Significa que al panel se le presentó la duda con respecto a la corporación que
En realidad es propietaria de los nombres de dominio y per se, el primero
Asumió, sin más investigación, que no existía ninguna relación entre las dos
Corporaciones, cuando Se ha establecido que es la misma persona jurídica
GRIPGUARD INC. Es el mismo TOTAL PLAY INC. Al asumir esta posición incorrecta,
el panel de expertos de OMPI determinó de manera incorrecta que TOTAL PLAY INC.
No tiene derechos ni intereses legítimos con respecto a los nombres de dominio sujetos
a controversia, y como corolario por medio de la presente aplico Mala Fe al demandado
TOTAL PLAY INC en El uso de los nombres de dominio antes mencionados. Acción
que ha causado un gran daño económico y de desarrollo comercial a TOTALPLAY SAS
5) Que de acuerdo a los reconocimientos realizados por el GRUPO SALINAS DE
MEXICO es claro que no se cumplían ni se cumplen los tres presupuestos
necesarios para que el PANEL DENUNCIADO ordenara la transferencia de los
Nombres de Dominio TOTAL-PLAY.COM TOTAL-PLAY.CO
TOTALPLAY.COM.CO TOTAL-PLAY.COM.CO MITOTALPLAY.COM.CO
6) De acuerdo a Cesiones de derechos privadas realizadas mucho la apertura del Caso
D2012-2533 y antes de la expedición de la decisión del panel de la OMPI de fecha
9 de Abril de 2013. entre TOTAL PLAY INC y TOTALPLAY SAS y COLOMBIAN
SWEEPER COMPANY CSC SAS, la Corporación TOTAL PLAY INC había cedido
todos sus derechos sobre los nombres de dominio en TOTAL-PLAY.COM TOTAL-
PLAY.CO TOTALPLAY.COM.CO TOTAL-PLAY.COM.CO
MITOTALPLAY.COM.CO a TOTALPLAY SAS y COLOMBIAN SWEEPER
COMPANY CSC SAS. Todo lo anterior con la validez legal de la ley 1258 de 2008
de la Republica de Colombia y el Velo Corporativo de las leyes del Estado de New
York y de Confidencialidad de la Republica de Colombia.
7) Que como base a lo anterior el registrador en Colombia cumplió con la aplicación
legal de estos derechos entregados mediante CESION y en aplicabilidad a estas
leyes. Los Dominios TOTALPLAY.COM.CO TOTAL-PLAY.COM.CO y
MITOTALPLAY.COM.CO tienen como Su titular a COLOMBIAN SWEEPER
COMPANY CSC SAS identificada con NIT 900.360.752-9 Empresa que no fue
Incluida en la Demanda presentaba en Ginebra Suiza D2012-2533 como por lógica
tampoco está cobijada por las Decisiones emitidas por el panel administrativo.
COLOMBIAN SWEEPER COMPANY CSC SAS ejerce pleno dominio comercial y legal
sobre los nombres de dominios TOTALPLAY.COM.CO TOTAL-PLAY.COM.CO y
MITOTALPLAY.COM.CO mediante Contrato de Arrendamiento con TOTALPLAY SAS
y en función de Participada Social.
Nombre del Dominio TOTALPLAY.COM.CO
ID del Dominio D22858925-CO
Entidad responsable del Registrador HELLO INTERNET CORP.
ID del Registrador 1924
URL (Servicio Registro) Registrador www.hellodotnyc.com
Estado del Dominio clientTransferProhibited

18
Numero Identificación de Registrante CE_45845434
Nombre del Registrante
COLOMBIAN SWEEPER
COMPANY CSC SAS
Compañía/Organización de Registrante
COLOMBIAN SWEEPER
COMPANY CSC SAS-
9003607529
Dirección del Registrante CARRERA 34 47 -23 OFICINA 1
Ciudad del Registrante BARRANQUILLA
Departamento/Ciudad del Registrante ATLANTICO
Código Postal del Registrante 00000
País de Registrante Colombia
Código de País del Registrador CO
Teléfono de Registrante +57.3207953622
Correo electrónico del Registrante
colombiansweepercompany@
gmail.com
Numero Identificación de Contacto AdministrativoCE_37057051
Nombre de Contacto Administrativo
COLOMBIAN SWEEPER
COMPANY CSC SAS
Compañía/Organización de Contacto
Administrativo
COLOMBIAN SWEEPER
COMPANY CSC SAS-
9003607529
Dirección de Contacto Administrativo CARRERA 34 47 -23 OFICINA 1
Ciudad de Contacto Administrativo BARRANQUILLA
Estado/Provincia de Contacto Administrativo ATLANTICO
Código Postal de Contacto Administrativo 00000
País de Contacto Administrativo Colombia
Código de País de Contacto Administrativo CO
Teléfono de Contacto Administrativo +57.3517473
Correo electrónico de contacto administrativo
gmail.com
Numero Identificación de Contacto de Pago CE_37057051
Nombre de Contacto de Pago
COLOMBIAN SWEEPER
COMPANY CSC SAS
Compañía/Organización de Contacto de Pago
COLOMBIAN SWEEPER
COMPANY CSC SAS-
9003607529
Dirección de Contacto de Pago CARRERA 34 47 -23 OFICINA 1
Ciudad de Contacto de Pago BARRANQUILLA
Estado/Provincia de Contacto de Pago ATLANTICO
Código Postal de Contacto de Pago 00000
País de Contacto de Pago Colombia
Código de País de Contacto de Pago CO
Teléfono de Contacto de Pago +57.3517473
Correo electrónico del Contacto de Pago
gmail.com
Número Identificación del Contacto Técnico CE_37057051
Nombre del Contacto Técnico
COLOMBIAN SWEEPER
COMPANY CSC SAS

19
Compañía/Organización del Contacto Técnico
COLOMBIAN SWEEPER
COMPANY CSC SAS-
9003607529
Dirección del Contacto Técnico CARRERA 34 47 -23 OFICINA 1
Ciudad del Contacto Técnico BARRANQUILLA
Departamento/Ciudad del Contacto Técnico ATLANTICO
Código Postal del Contacto Técnico 00000
País del Contacto Técnico Colombia
Código de País del Contacto Técnico CO
Teléfono del Contacto Técnico +57.3517473
Correo electrónico del Contacto Técnico
gmail.com
nombre del servidor NS12.HELLODOTNYC.COM
nombre del servidor NS13.HELLODOTNYC.COM
Creado por el Registrador
CENTRAL COMERCIALIZADORA
DE INTERNET S.A.S
Ultima fecha de actualización por el Registrador HELLO INTERNET CORP.
Ultima transferencia del Dominio
Tue Nov 08 15:39:09 GMT
2016
Fecha de Registro del Dominio Sat Nov 05 01:08:36 GMT 2011
Expiración del Dominio Sat Nov 04 23:59:59 GMT 2017
Ultima fecha de actualización del Dominio
Nombre del
Dominio
TOTAL-PLAY.COM.CO
Entidad
responsable del
Registrador
HELLO.CO
URL (Servicio
Registro)
Registrador
www.hello.co
Estado del
Dominio
clientTransferProhibited
Numero
Identificación de
Registrante
CE_37057051
Nombre del
Registrante
COLOMBIAN SWEEPER
COMPANY CSC SAS
Compañía/Organi
zación de
Registrante
COLOMBIAN SWEEPER
COMPANY CSC SAS-
9003607529
Dirección del
Registrante
CARRERA 34 47 -23 OFICINA 1
Ciudad del
Registrante
BARRANQUILLA
Thu Nov 10 09:26:08 GMT
2016

20
Departamento/Ci
udad del
Registrante
ATLANTICO
Código Postal del
Registrante
00000
País de
Registrante
Colombia
Código de País del
Registrador
CO
Teléfono de
Registrante
+57.3517473
Correo electrónico
del Registrante
gmail.com
Numero
Identificación de
Contacto
Administrativo
CE_37057051
Nombre de
Contacto
Administrativo
COLOMBIAN SWEEPER
COMPANY CSC SAS
Compañía/Organi
zación de
Contacto
Administrativo
COLOMBIAN SWEEPER
COMPANY CSC SAS-
9003607529
Dirección de
Contacto
Administrativo
Ciudad de
Contacto
Administrativo
BARRANQUILLA
Estado/Provincia
de Contacto
Administrativo
ATLANTICO
Código Postal de
Contacto
Administrativo
00000
País de Contacto
Administrativo
Colombia
Código de País de
Contacto
Administrativo
CO
Teléfono de
Contacto
Administrativo
+57.3517473
Correo electrónico
de contacto
administrativo
gmail.com
Numero
Identificación de
Contacto de Pago
CE_37057051

21
Nombre de
Contacto de Pago
COLOMBIAN SWEEPER
COMPANY CSC SAS
Compañía/Organi
zación de
Contacto de Pago
COLOMBIAN SWEEPER
COMPANY CSC SAS-
9003607529
Dirección de
Contacto de Pago
Ciudad de
Contacto de Pago
BARRANQUILLA
Estado/Provincia
de Contacto de
Pago
ATLANTICO
Código Postal de
Contacto de Pago
00000
País de Contacto
de Pago
Colombia
Código de País de
Contacto de Pago
CO
Teléfono de
Contacto de Pago
+57.3517473
Correo electrónico
del Contacto de
Pago
gmail.com
Número
Identificación del
Contacto Técnico
CE_37057051
Nombre del
Contacto Técnico
COLOMBIAN SWEEPER
COMPANY CSC SAS
Compañía/Organi
zación del
Contacto Técnico
COLOMBIAN SWEEPER
COMPANY CSC SAS-
9003607529
Dirección del
Contacto Técnico
Ciudad del
Contacto Técnico
BARRANQUILLA
Departamento/Ci
udad del Contacto
Técnico
ATLANTICO
Código Postal del
Contacto Técnico
00000
País del Contacto
Técnico
Colombia
Contacto Técnico
CO
Teléfono del
Contacto Técnico
+57.3517473
Correo electrónico
del Contacto
Técnico
gmail.com

22
nombre del
servidor
HELLO01.MARS.ORDERBOX-
DNS.COM
nombre del
servidor
HELLO01.EARTH.ORDERBOX-
DNS.COM
nombre del
servidor
HELLO01.VENUS.ORDERBOX-
DNS.COM
nombre del
servidor
HELLO01.MERCURY.ORDERBO
X-DNS.COM
Creado por el
Registrador
DE INTERNET S.A.S
Ultima fecha de
actualización por
el Registrador
HELLO.CO
Ultima
transferencia del
Dominio
Wed Nov 13 14:46:21 GMT
2013
Fecha de Registro
del Dominio
Mon Nov 14 23:46:41 GMT
2011
Expiración del
Dominio
Mon Nov 13 23:59:59 GMT
2017
Ultima fecha de
actualización del
Dominio
Wed Nov 09 06:15:23 GMT
2016
Nombre del
Dominio
MITOTALPLAY.COM.CO
Entidad
responsable del
Registrador
HELLO INTERNET CORP.
URL (Servicio
Registro)
Registrador
www.hellodotnyc.com
Estado del
Dominio
clientTransferProhibited
Numero
Identificación de
Registrante
CE_37057051
Nombre del
Registrante
COLOMBIAN SWEEPER
COMPANY CSC SAS
Compañía/Organiz
ación de
Registrante
COLOMBIAN SWEEPER
COMPANY CSC SAS-
9003607529
Dirección del
Registrante
Ciudad del
Registrante
BARRANQUILLA
Departamento/Ci
udad del
Registrante
ATLANTICO

23
Código Postal del
Registrante
00000
País de
Registrante
Colombia
Registrador
CO
Teléfono de
Registrante
+57.3517473
Correo electrónico
del Registrante
gmail.com
Numero
Identificación de
Contacto
Administrativo
CE_37057051
Nombre de
Contacto
Administrativo
COLOMBIAN SWEEPER
COMPANY CSC SAS
Compañía/Organiz
ación de Contacto
Administrativo
COLOMBIAN SWEEPER
COMPANY CSC SAS-
9003607529
Dirección de
Contacto
Administrativo
Ciudad de
Contacto
Administrativo
BARRANQUILLA
Estado/Provincia
de Contacto
Administrativo
ATLANTICO
Código Postal de
Contacto
Administrativo
00000
País de Contacto
Administrativo
Colombia
Código de País de
Contacto
Administrativo
CO
Teléfono de
Contacto
Administrativo
+57.3517473
Correo electrónico
de contacto
administrativo
gmail.com
Numero
Identificación de
Contacto de Pago
CE_37057051
Nombre de
Contacto de Pago
COLOMBIAN SWEEPER
COMPANY CSC SAS

24
Compañía/Organiz
ación de Contacto
de Pago
COLOMBIAN SWEEPER
COMPANY CSC SAS-
9003607529
Dirección de
Contacto de Pago
Ciudad de
Contacto de Pago
BARRANQUILLA
Estado/Provincia
de Contacto de
Pago
ATLANTICO
Código Postal de
Contacto de Pago
00000
País de Contacto
de Pago
Colombia
Código de País de
Contacto de Pago
CO
Teléfono de
Contacto de Pago
+57.3517473
Correo electrónico
del Contacto de
Pago
gmail.com
Número
Identificación del
Contacto Técnico
CE_37057051
Nombre del
Contacto Técnico
COLOMBIAN SWEEPER
COMPANY CSC SAS
Compañía/Organiz
ación del Contacto
Técnico
COLOMBIAN SWEEPER
COMPANY CSC SAS-
9003607529
Dirección del
Contacto Técnico
Ciudad del
Contacto Técnico
BARRANQUILLA
Departamento/Ci
udad del Contacto
Técnico
ATLANTICO
Código Postal del
Contacto Técnico
00000
País del Contacto
Técnico
Colombia
Contacto Técnico
CO
Teléfono del
Contacto Técnico
+57.3517473
Correo electrónico
del Contacto
Técnico
gmail.com
nombre del
servidor
NS12.HELLODOTNYC.COM

25
nombre del
servidor
NS13.HELLODOTNYC.COM
Creado por el
Registrador
DE INTERNET S.A.S
Ultima fecha de
actualización por
el Registrador
HELLO INTERNET CORP.
Ultima
transferencia del
Dominio
Fri Nov 25 14:30:34 GMT 2016
Fecha de Registro
del Dominio
Thu Nov 17 03:03:55 GMT
2011
Expiración del
Dominio
Thu Nov 16 23:59:59 GMT
2017
Ultima fecha de
actualización del
Dominio
Tue Jan 10 00:39:19 GMT 2017
8) Sin embargo los dominios TOTAL-PLAY.COM y TOTAL-PLAY.CO por un acto ilegal y
de características penales el Registrador GO DADDY INC realizo una transferencia
NO consentida de Activos que se constituye en un delito penal a CAVELIER
ABOGADOS Y/O EDUARDO SECONDO VARELA PEZZANO. Cuando estos dominios
debían quedar en suspenso y bajo control de TOTAL PLAY INC hoy TOTALPLAY SAS
mientras se resolvían de fondo las denuncias presentadas en COLOMBIA y ESTADOS
UNIDOS; una de las cuales remitió en fecha Agosto 23 de 2013 el
SUPERINTENDENTE DE INDUSTRIA Y COMERCIO DE COLOMBIA DR. Pablo Felipe
Robledo del Castillo ante el Despacho de FRANCIS GURRY DIRECTOR DE LA
ORGANIZACIÓN MUNDIAL DE PROPIEDAD INDUSTRIAL al considerar que por
competencia le correspondía atender la denuncia y resolver los yerros y nulidades
contenidas en la decisión del panel conformado por PABLO PALAZZI, ALVARO
LOUREIRO OLIVEIRA Y DAVID W QUINTO. Sin embargo desde Septiembre de 2013
hasta la fecha 05 de Junio de 2017 el Señor FRANCIS GURRY OMITIO y GUARDO
SILENCIO ADMINISTRATIVO sobre esta denuncia lo cual se constituye en un delito
grave penal internacional dado que se ocasionaron, y están ocasionando graves
perjuicios económicos a las empresas y comerciales a TOTAL PLAY INC hoy
TOTALPLAY SAS y adicionalmente como se demostrara también se han ocasionado
perjuicios morales, de derechos humanos y personales al Ciudadano Colombiano
JOHNY ALFONSO ROMERO ROCHA.
9) En Base al punto 8 anterior. Me permito declarar que en calidad de Ciudadano
Colombiano mi nombre es JOHNY ALFONSO ROMERO ROCHA identificado con CC
72.200.057 no tengo antecedentes de ningún tipo y no debo ser llamado AKA JOHNY
ALFONSO ROMERO ROCHA como se menciona en la ilegal decisión D-2012-2533
toda vez que el termino AKA refiere al apodo que usan las personas cuando son
conocidos como y en mi caso yo no soy conocido como JOHNY ALFONSO ROMERO
ROCHA, Este es mi nombre desde mi nacimiento JOHNY ALFONSO ROMERO
ROCHA, tal como reza en mi registro Civil, en mi cedula de Ciudadanía y en mi
pasaporte. Se me señalo de usar nombres falsos y direcciones falsos, lo cual solo es
propio de los delincuentes , tipología que no aplica a mi reconocido comportamiento
estudiantil, profesional y personal donde he sido distinguido en todos los centros
educativos donde he estudiado y en los sitios donde he laborado no he cometido delito
alguno. Todo lo anterior ya previamente denunciados de forma detallada me ha
ocasionado graves perjuicios morales, económicos, familiares, motivacionales y
personales. A continuación Documento de Identificación Nacional 72.200.057

26
10) Que dentro de los términos legales y en pleno uso de sus facultades la Corporación
TOTAL PLAY INC Cedió todos los derechos de las Marcas TOTALPLAY y nombre
comercial TOTALPLAY en Estados Unidos de Norteamérica y En Colombia a la
sociedad TOTALPLAY SAS NIT 900.603.020 de igual forma cedió todos los derechos
litigiosos, en suspenso y futuros. Actualmente TOTALPLAY SAS es la titular de los
registros marcarios, nombre comercial y nombres de dominio TOTAL-PLAY.COM y
TOTAL-PLAY.CO. tal como es de conocimiento de la Oficina de Marcas y Patentes de
Estados Unidos de América y de la Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio de
Colombia.

27
11) Que como base a lo anterior y al ACUERDO DE CONCILIACION y AL SILENCIO
ADMINISTRATIVO Del DIRECTOR DE LA OMPI FRANCIS GURRY solicito se resuelva
de FONDO las siguientes PETICIONES.
1) Que El Secretario General de las Naciones Unidas Sr. Antonio Guterres , quien
es el Superior de Francis Gurry al Ser la OMPI una Oficina Adscrita a las Naciones
Unidas Investigue el Accionar del director de la OMPI (WIPO) y del PANEL
ADMINISTRATIVO Conformado por PABLO PALAZZI, ALVARO LOUREIRO
OLIVEIRA Y DAVID W QUINTO y solicite que se emita la nulidad de la DECISION
Contenida en la Resolución D2012-2533 que se encuentra para su información
detallada en este link y se anexa en el acápite de pruebas.
http://www.wipo.int/amc/es/domains/search/text.jsp?case=D2012-2533 ordenando
la Devolucion inmediata de los Dominios TOTAL-PLAY.COM Y TOTAL-PLAY.CO A
TOTALPLAY SAS NIT 900.603.020-0 Barranquilla Colombia.
2) Solicito al FBI por intermedio de la Oficina Adscrita a la Embajada de Estados Unidos
en Colombia y en cabeza del Director de la Agencia, investigar la Conducta, las
omisiones y presuntos delitos cometidos por FRANCIS GURRY, PABLO PALAZZI,
ALVARO LOUREIRO OLIVEIRA, DAVID W QUINTO y BLAKE IRVING CEO DE
GO DADDY INC, en este CASO. Decisión que afecto comercial y económicamente
a una Corporación Americana y Afecta los derechos comerciales de marcas
registradas en Estados Unidos de Norteamérica.
3) Demando ante UNCITRAL Secretaría de la CNUDMI que se condene a la
ORGANIZACIÓN MUNDIAL DE PROPIEDAD INDUSTRIAL OMPI (WIPO) A SU
DIRECTOR FRANCIS GURRY Y A LOS PANELISTAS PABLO PALAZZI,
ALVARO LOUREIRO OLIVEIRA Y DAVID W QUINTO Y A GO DADDY INC
representada por su CEO DAVID IRVING , al pago de una indemnización por
daños y perjuicios económicos y comerciales de $1.000.000 Un millón de
dólares americanos a TOTALPLAY SAS NIT 900.603.020-0 y el pago de
$1.000.000 un millón de dólares por daños y perjuicios Personales y morales
y profesionales a JOHNY ALFONSO ROMERO ROCHA Cedula de Ciudadanía
Numero 72.200.057.
4) Solicito al SECRETARIO GENERAL DE LA INTERPOL Jürgen Stock Y/O quienes
hagan las veces y al Presidente de la INTERPOL Meng Hongwei que ordene de oficio
dado el silencio presentado por tres años seis meses, por el Director de la OMPI y los
panelistas implicados, la expedición de las CIRCULARES AZULES INTERPOL
CONTRA FRANCIS GURRY, PABLO PALAZZI, ALVARO LOUREIRO OLIVEIRA,
DAVID W QUINTO y al CEO de GO DADDY INC BLAKE IRVING, hasta que no
resuelvan de fondo las denuncias presentadas en sus despachos. Para la
localización de los denunciados mencionados en con la colaboración de las oficinas
de la interpol de SUIZA; ARGENTINA, BRASIL Y ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMERICA
(USA) entregamos a continuación sus fotografías, direcciones, cargos, correos
electrónicos y teléfonos. SOLICITO AL DIRECTOR DE LA POLICIA NACIONAL
COLOMBIA Y AL DIRECTOR INTERPOL COLOMBIA Establecer Contacto con los
Señores: Jurgen Stock y Meng Hongwei para la expedición de las Circulares
azules. Pablo A. Palazzi ARGENTINA
ESPECIMEN FOTOGRAFIA AÑO 2012-2013 ESPECIMEN FOTOGRAFIA 2017
Partner Allende & Brea
Argentina
Derecho

28
Actual Allende & Brea,
Universidad de San Andres
Anterior Revista Latinoamericana de Protección de Datos personales,
Cabanellas, Etchebarne & Kelly,
Supreme Court of Argentina
Educación
n
Universidad Católica Argentina. Fordham University School of Law
Sitios web Sitio web personal
Sitio web de la empresa
http://www.allendebrea.com.ar/Abogado/DetailsSocio/16?printPrevie
w=False Email pap@allendebrea.com.ar
+54 11 4318-9986
http://www.udesa.edu.ar/departamento-de-derecho/profesores/pablo-andres-palazzi
http://pablopalazzi.blogspot.com.co/
https://co.linkedin.com/in/pablopalazzi
Dirección: Vito Dumas 284, B1644BID Victoria, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Teléfono: +54 11 4725-7000
Alvaro Loureiro Oliveira BRASIL
ESPECIMEN FOTOGRAFICO AÑO 2017
Sócio
Advogado
Agente da Propriedade Industrial
Rio de Janeiro
alvaro@dannemann.com.br
+55 (21) 2237 8834
Rio de Janeiro
Rua Marquês de Olinda, 70 - Parte - Botafogo
22251-040 Rio de Janeiro RJ - Brasil
Tel:: +55 21 2237 8700
Fax:: +55 21 2237 8922
mail@dannemann.com.br

29
São Paulo
Av. Indianópolis, 739
04063-000 São Paulo - SP - Brasil
Tel:: +55 11 2155 9500
spmail@dannemann.com.br
Brasília
SCS, Quadra 1, Bloco H, nº 30 - 3° Andar
70399-900 Brasília - DF - Brasil
Edifício Morro Vermelho
Tel:: +55 61 3433 6694
Fax:: +55 61 3433 6695
dfmail@dannemann.com.br
DAVID W. QUINTO
ESTADOS UNIDOS DE NORTEAMERICA
https://www.linkedin.com/in/david-quinto-7109a45

30
https://api.vidangel.com/invest/team/
Contacto: https://vidangel.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/requests/new
press@vidangel.com
FRANCIS GURRY DIRECTOR OMPI WIPO.
http://www.wipo.int/about-wipo/es/dgo/
Organización Mundial de la Propiedad Intelectual
34, chemin des Colombettes
CH-1211 Ginebra 20, Suiza
BLAKE IRVING. CEO DE GO DADDY INC DESDE 7 DE ENERO DE 2013
ESPECIMEN FOTOGRAFICO DEL AÑO 2012
Company Name GODADDY INC. Company Address14455 N. HAYDEN ROAD
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260 Company Phone(480)505-8800 Company Website:

31
http://www.godaddy.com CEO : Blake J. Irving
Email: Soporte@godaddy.com Support@godaddy.com legal@godaddy.com
5) Solicito al FISCAL GENERAL DE COLOMBIA, Coordinar con el FBI y los
organismos internacionales para la Resolución de Fondo de estos asuntos.
6) Solicito al Procurador General de la Nación y a la Personería de Bogota D.C. se
brinde la trazabilidad y Protección en Derechos fundamentales y civiles a nivel
internacional en este caso. En cumplimiento de los acuerdos internacionales.
7) A la Presidencia de La Republica de Colombia y al Ministerio de Comunicaciones
MINTIC ventilar este asunto, haciéndole la trazabilidad debida.
8) CIDH, CORTE IDH, COMUNIDAD ANDINA y DEFENSORIA DEL PUEBLO,
garantizar los derechos fundamentales.
PRUEBAS TESTIMONIALES: Mediante la Web mundial Carta abierta
http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/case-tv-azteca-mexico-obstruction-justice-any-abuse-one-or-
more-undertakings-dominant Doce mil cuatrocientas veinte y tres (12423) personas
tienen conocimiento del caso de igual forma instituciones nacionales de Colombia y del
Perú e internacionales de estados unidos de América
To The
FBI FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Copy to: Department of Justice
US EMBASSY BOGOTA COLOMBIA
US GOVERNMENT.
REF: COMPLAINT ID: I 1506071229174771
OF: TOTAL PLAY INC. AND TOTALPLAY S.A.S.
AGAINST: GO DADDY INC ARIZONA USA / TV AZTECA SAB OF CV MEXICO D.F.
COMPLAINT ID : unauthorized transfer of assets, www.total-play.com www.total-
play.co domains. transferred by Go Daddy INC and usufruct and used by TV AZTECA SAB
DE CV, without complaints have been completed and legal requirements to the competent
authorities
The panel comprised: David Quinto (Hollywood, Ca, USA), Loureiro Da Silva (Rio de
Janeiro, Brazil) and Pablo Palazzi (Buenos Aires, Argentina). They disregarded order more
tests and failed regardless of who TOTAL PLAY INC, owns the trademarks and trade names
TOTALPLAY® in Colombia and the United States. Without investigating, the company
GripGuard Inc changed its name to TOTAL PLAY INC. legally registered with the
Department of State of New York and to the Chamber of Commerce of Barranquilla.
Pursuing complaint with the prosecution of Colombia because there was violation of the right
to personal and professional privacy and human rights of the natural person JOHNY
ALFONSO ROMERO ROCHA. WIPO has not acted background on the subject when it is
your duty to do so
JOHNY ALFONSO ROMERO ROCHA, male, of legal age and domiciled in Barranquilla,
Colombia, identified with Citizenship Card 72.200.057 from Barranquilla, passport number
AM 852285 from COLOMBIA, social security number 598-52-66//, DIRECTOR OF TOTAL
PLAY INC AND TOTALPLAY SAS, acting on behalf and in representation of the
corporations TOTAL PLAY INC. and TOTALPLAY S.A.S., I hereby and respectfully
represent that I am filing COMPLAINT against the corporations: GO DADDY INC
Represented by Blake Irving and TVAZTECA S.A.B. DE C.V., Foreign Company Legally
Represented by Mr. Darío de Jesus Rodríguez Villicaña, Francisco Xavier Borrego Hinojosa
Linage or Who does substitute him at the time of Service of Notice of this action, and
TVAZTECA SUCURSAL COLOMBIA, identified with NIT 900.474.762-2 Branch Office of
TVAZTECA S.A.B. DE C.V. in Colombia and legally represented by Ms. GLADYS
ALEXANDRA REYES GOMEZ or Who shall substitute her at the time of Service of Notice
of this action, all of the above pursuant the following
RECITALS:

32
1. On August 10th of 2011 was created in the State of New York, in the United States, the
company GRIPGUARD INC. as a corporation, under section 402 of the Corporate Business
Law, designating Mr. JOHNY ALFONSO ROMERO ROCHA as Director;
GRIPGUARD INC. did use the trademark and trade name TOTALPLAY for the first time and
as from August 31st 2011, and in commerce as from October 31st 2011, proceeding to
request the awarding of the exclusive registration of said rights on December 21st 2011, for
the nominative trademark TOTALPLAY and on January 3rd 2012 for the mixed trademark
TOTALPLAY.
Upon completion of all relevant procedures, the aforementioned trademarks were awarded
through the following registries: for the mixed trademark TOTALPLAY: Reg. No. 4190587
dated August 14th 2012, for the nominative trademark TOTALPLAY: Reg. No. 4243480
dated November 13th 2012, both registrations are for the International Nice Class 25 that
does comprise Clothing, Footwear and Hat manufacturing in general
All registrations were awarded by the Federal Department of Trademarks and Patents of the
United States.
GRIPGUARD INC. pursuant the Free Trade Agreement executed between the U.S. and
Colombia, exercising the priority replevin right provided for at the Paris Covenant, did apply
for the registration for Colombia of the trade name TOTALPLAY on December 29th 2011,
nominative trademark TOTALPLAY on December 29th 2011, both with priority at December
21st 2011, date when registration in the United States was applied for, and the mixed
trademark TOTALPLAY. On April 15th 2012, with priority at January 3rd 2012, date when
registration in the United States was applied for, all of the above for International Nice Class
25
These registrations in Colombia were granted on the following dates: the trade name through
Resolution 1511 dated January 24th 2012 and Deposit Certificate No. 20718 dated January
24th 2012, the nominative trademark through resolution 59232 dated September 28th 2012
and Certificate No. 467274 and the mixed trademark through resolution No. 59224 dated
September 28th 2012 and Certificate No. 467273
All of the aforementioned documents were issued by the Superintendence of Industry and
Commerce of Colombia
We hereby clarify to the Court that GRIPGUARD INC. requested the change of the corporate
name or firm name GRIPGUARD INC. to TOTAL PLAY INC. at the New York State
Department on April 23rd 2012, with filing No. 120508000091, said proceedings were
completed on May 8th 2012, certificated by the Secretary of the Department of State of the
State of New York DANIEL E. SHAPIRO
Pursuant all of the above it is established with absolute clarity that the legitimate owner of
the aforementioned trademarks, both in the United States as well as in Colombia is TOTAL
PLAY INC.
2. Throughout the application and awarding proceedings for the trademarks' registration in the
United States, no opposition nor claims from any corporation or individual were filed, thus,
said proceedings were satisfactorily completed for GRIPGUARD INC. currently TOTAL
PLAY INC.
3. Throughout the proceedings for application and award of the trademarks' registration in
Colombia, the company TVAZTECA S.A.B. DE C.V. did file objection to the registration
thereof, yet eventually the Director of Distinctive Signs of the Superintendence of Industry
and Commerce, through Resolution 59224 dated September 28th 2012 and 59232 dated
September 28th 2012 did rule said objections as groundless and the trademarks'
registrations were awarded to GRIPGUARD INC. currently TOTAL PLAY INC., the
aforementioned resolutions were appealed by TVAZTECA S.A.B. DE C.V. but the decisions
contested were confirmed through resolutions 603 and 604 dated January 22nd 2013 by the
Deputy Superintendent of Industry and Commerce at the Superintendence of Industry and
Commerce of Colombia

33
4. The Corporation TOTAL PLAY INC. as the legitimate owner of the aforementioned
trademarks, for the due publicity and legitimate use in commerce uses at the world-wide
WEB the following domain names: TOTAL-PLAY.COM, TOTALPLAY.COM.CO, TOTAL-
PLAY.CO, TOTAL-PLAY.COM.CO and MITOTALPLAY.COM.CO the registrant and holder
of title of these domain manes in the internet is the corporation TOTAL PLAY INC. who has
been exercising the legitimate utilization of the aforementioned trademarks and domain
names quite some time before TVAZTECA S.A.B. DE C.V. did file any claim
5. Due to the fact it did not obtain positive results in Colombia through the objections filed with
regards to the aforementioned trademarks, the company TVAZTECA S.A.B. DE C.V. did file
a complaint at the ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER OF THE WORLD
COPYRIGHTS ORGANIZATION in Switzerland, on this occasion in view of the presumed
illegitimate utilization by TOTAL PLAY INC. of the domain names www.total-
play.com, www.totalplay.com.co, www.mitotalplay.com.co, www.total-play.com.co,
and www.total-play.co, the juridical or administrative grounds of the complaint are based in
provisions at the Uniform Policy for the Settlement of Controversies on the Matter of Domain
Names, Article 4°, sections a. – b. – and c., and in the Regulations of the Uniform Policy for
the Settlement of Controversies on the Matter of Domain Names, Article 3.- it being a biased,
ill-advised complaint with false arguments that does not state the facts in the actual manner
they did occur, whereby the claimants did manage to induce to error the ruling officials, this
eventually concluded in a ruling against TOTAL PLAY INC. whereby the registers
GODADDY.COM and MI.COM.CO are ordered to transfer the domain names subject of
dispute to TVAZTECA S.A.B. DE C.V.
6. At the ruling or resolution was not taken into consideration the fact that GRIPGUARD INC.
corporation is the same corporation as TOTAL PLAY INC., and the administrative experts'
panel did not apply the same body of rules or regulations that do govern this procedure,
such as article 12th, that reads:
"Besides the complaint and reply writ, the group pf experts, pursuant their legal powers,
could request other depositions or documents from either party"
And, the same regulations, as part of the powers granted thereby, allows the panel of experts
to extend the terms fixed thereat, (article 10).
This means that the panel was presented the doubt with regards to the corporation that
actually is the owner of the domain names and per se, the former did assume, without any
further research, that there did not exist any relationship between the two corporations, when
it has been actually established that it is the same juridical person. GRIPGUARD INC. is the
same TOTAL PLAY INC.
By assuming this incorrect position, the OMPI panel of experts did determine in a wrong
manner that TOTAL PLAY INC. has no rights nor legitimate interests with regards to the
domain names subject to dispute, and as corollary I hereby foist Bad Faith to the defendant
in the use of the aforementioned domain names. Action that has caused huge damage to
TOTAL PLAY INC.
7. Notwithstanding the aforementioned decision, the previously quoted Regulations at Article
18 and the OMPI Policy at Article 4 paragraph K, grant the parties the possibility to file at
competent jurisdiction in their respective countries, all claims or complaints about facts
investigated or decided upon by the former
The claimant, at the complaint petition in Spanish before OMPI did state that it would be
subject to Colombian Jurisdiction, and the complaint petition in English leaves open the
possibilities provided for at said regulations, to proceed at the jurisdiction of either party.
8. In the event the OMPI resolution whereby it is ordered to transfer the domain names subject
to dispute from TOTAL PLAY INC. to TVAZTECA S.A.B. DE C.V., at the WEB, the damages
that would be caused to the corporation TOTAL PLAY INC., affecting the development of its
strategic plan and its positioning in the global market through the WEB.
Eventually, the promotion of its brands, products, franchises and trade names legally
obtained would be voided in an undue manner at the national and international markets,
thus generating huge economic losses to the corporation both in its projections as well as in

34
the investments made, which, we estimate, at this time would be undetermined, however
we do estimate such at more than USD 1.000.000 (USD. $1.000.0000).
Regardless such economic loss, what actually does interest the claimants at this action is
the ability to use the domain names without any conditions, names that had been used in a
legitimate manner by TOTAL PLAY INC and TOTALPLAY S.A.S., up to the time when OMPI
did order the transfer thereof.
9. TOTAL PLAY S.AS., is a Colombian company licensee of TOTAL PLAY INC., for the entire
Colombian territory, thus, its interests shall also be affected by the decision of OMPI, for this
reason it is a corporation with legitimate interest in this action and must be acknowledged
as a party of this action.
10. In order to reach a possible settlement and with the purpose of complying with the requisite
of admissibility required at these actions, the claimants TOTAL PLAY INC. and TOTALPLAY
S.A.S., did resort to the ANA BOLIVAR DE CONSUEGRA CONCILIATION AND
ARBITRATION CENTER of UNIVERSIDAD SIMON BOLIVAR, and, through summons to a
hearing to all parties mentioned hereat, the CONCILIATION HEARING was held on the 22nd
day of May of 2013, said hearing did not attain any results.
CLAIMS:
That through ruling that is determined as res judicata, it be decided:
FIRST: That are the property under full and absolute ownership of the corporation TOTAL
PLAY INC. and of its licensee in Colombia TOTAL PLAY S.A.S., the web domain
names, www.total-play.com, www.totalplay.com.co, www.mitotalplay.com.co, www.total-
play.com.co and www.total-play.co.
SECOND: That as a consequence of the aforementioned declaration the defendants be
sentenced to restore, upon execution of this ruling, in favor of the claimant, the
aforementioned domain names.
THIRD: Also, that the official registers at the WEB, GODADDY.COM and MI.COM.CO be
ordered to transfer in favor of the claimants the aforementioned domain names.
FOURTH: That the defendants be sentenced as owners in bad faith and also to cover court
costs.
FIFTH: That the defendants be sentenced to the payment of indemnification for damages
caused to the claimants for the amount of USD. $1.000.000 (one million dollars)
SIXTH: DIRECT EXAMINATION
That a direct examination be decreed to the legal representatives of the defendants, so that
they do complete the examination I shall formulate them.
SEVENTH: EXPERT EVIDENCE
I hereby request the designation of experts specialized in the matter who shall determine
the value in actual currency of the damages caused to my constituents by the actions of the
defendants, nevertheless, my constituents do estimate said loss at more than USD
1.000.000, LEGAL TENDER (USD$1.000.000).
REGISTRATION OF THE ACTION:
I hereby request the FBI and US department of Jusitice to register this action with the official
WEB registers WEB GODADDY.COM (Go Daddy
INC) Domaindisputes@godaddy.com, soporte@godaddy.com, support@godaddy.com an
d MI.COM.CO (Internet Marketer
SAS) servicioalcliente@mi.com.co aristizabal@mi.com.co so that the aforementioned
domain names are not marketed nor used until this action is decided upon. And for the
former to remain under the control of TOTAL PLAY INC and TOTALPLAY SAS pursuant
regulations that govern the matter of domain names.

35
LEGAL GROUNDS
United States Constitution: Safeguards of civil rights (Amendments 13, 14, 15, 19, 23, 24,
26)
BUSSINES CORPORATION LAW
Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement (TPA)
AMOUNT:
As the proceedings herein are those established at Ledger III, Title XXI, of the Civil
Procedure Code. In view of the nature of the matter and the location of the claimants and
defendants and in view of the amount which I do estimate as in excess of one MILLION
Dollars, LEGAL TENDER (USD. $1.000.000.oo). This Court is competent to hear the action.
EVIDENCE:
 Certificate of Incumbency and legal representation GripGuard Inc. duly certified and
apostilled.
 Certificate of Change of Name of GripGuard Inc. to TOTALPLAY Inc. duly certified and
apostilled.
 Certificate of Incumbency and legal representation of TOTAL PLAY S.A.S.
 Title of the nominative trademark TOTALPLAY issued by the Bureau of Patents and
Trademarks of the United States of America.
 Title of the mixed trademark TOTALPLAY issued by the Bureau of Patents and Trademarks
of the United States of America
 Deposit of Trade Name TOTALPLAY issued by the Superintendence of Industry and
Commerce of Colombia.
 Resolution of the Awarding of the Trade Name
 Title of the nominative trademark TOTALPLAY issued by the Superintendence of Industry
and Commerce of Colombia
 Title of the mixed trademark TOTALPLAY issued by the Superintendence of Industry and
Commerce of Colombia.
 Solutions # 59232 and # 59224 dated September 28th 2012, issued by the Superintendence
of Industry and Commerce whereby is awarded the TOTALPLAY Nice class 25 trademark
and the objections by TV AZTECA SAB DE CV is ruled groundless.
 Resolutions 603 and 604 dated January 22nd 2013 whereby ruling is made upon the appeal
filed by TV AZTECA SAB DE CV whereby is confirmed the Awarding of the registry of the
TOTALPLAY trademark at Nice class 25.
 Policy and Regulations for the settlement of disputes on matters regarding domain names
of OMPI approved by ICAAN
 Lawsuit filed by TV AZTECA at OMPI
 Reply to the Lawsuit by LEGAL FORCE in representation of TOTAL PLAY INC. and JOHNY
ALFONSO ROMERO ROCHA at OMPI.
 OMPI resolution whereby is ordered the transfer of the aforementioned domain names from
TOTAL PLAY INC. to TVAZTECA S.A.B. DE C.V.
 Conciliation Record from the Ana Bolívar de Consuegra Conciliation Center
ATTACHMENTS:
All listed at the Evidence paragraph, copies of the action to be served to the defendants and
archive and for performance of the action.
NOTICES:
TOTAL PLAY INC
80 STATE
ALBANY NY
12207-2543
USA
TOTALPLAY SAS
Carrera 34 Nº. 47-23
Suite # 1 in Barranquilla

36
Atlántico
Colombia.
The defendants at ;
TV Azteca, S.A.B. de C.V.. Periférico Sur 4121. Colonia Fuentes del Pedregal. 14141
México, D.F. MEXICO.
Carrera 9 A N°. 99-02 Of. 1001 Bogotá D.C. – COLOMBIA.
Respectfully,
JOHNY ALFONSO ROMERO ROCHA
DIRECTOR TOTAL PLAY INC
EIN 45-3049896
DIRECTOR TOTALPLAY SAS
NIT 900.603.020
CC 72.200.057
usufruct illegal domains: www.total-play.com
www.total-play.co
RESOLUCION CASO D2012-2533
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
TV Azteca S.A.B. de C.V. v. Johny Romero (aka Johny Alfonso Romero Rocha)/
Total Play Inc.
Case No. D2012-2533
1. The Parties
Complainant is TV Azteca S.A.B. De C.V. of México D.F., Mexico, represented by Cavelier
Abogados, Colombia.
Respondents are Johny Romero (aka Johny Alfonso Romero Rocha) from Barranquilla,
Colombia, and Total Play Inc. of United States of America, represented by LegalForce
RAPC Worldwide, United States.
2. The Domain Names and Registrars
The disputed domain names <total-play.co> and <total-play.com> are registered with
GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “First Registrar”), while the disputed domain names
<mitotalplay.com.co>, <total-play.com.co> and <totalplay.com.co> are registered with
Central Comercializadora de Internet S.A.S (the “Second Registrar”).
3. Procedural History
The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on
December 21, 2012. On December 24, 2012, the Center transmitted by email to both
Registrars a request for registrar verification in connection with the disputed domain
names. On December 24, 2012, the First Registrar transmitted by email to the Center its
verification response disclosing registrant and contact information for the disputed domain
names which differed from the named Respondent and contact information in the
Complaint. On December 29, 2012, the Second Registrar transmitted by email to the
Center its verification response confirming that Respondent is listed as the registrant and
providing the contact details.
The Center sent an email communication to Complainant on January 11, 2013 providing
the registrant and contact information disclosed by the Registrar, and requesting the
Complainant to 1) submit an amendment to the Complaint to add the registrant of record

37
for the disputed domain names <total-play.co> and <total-play.com> and demonstrate that
both registrants are, in fact, the same entity or that the disputed domain names are under
common control or 2) file a separate Complaint in relation to the domain names <total-
play.co> and <total-play.com>, and file a short amendment to drop said separately-filed
domain names from the current Complaint. On January 11, 2013, the Center also received
several informal communications from Total Play Inc..
Complainant filed an amended Complaint on January 15, 2013, indicating the connection
or relationship between the disputed domain names and their listed domain name holders.
On January 16, 2013, the Center communicated to the parties that the language of the
registration agreements for the disputed domain names was English and Spanish. On
January 17, 2013, the Center sent an email communication to Complainant inviting it to
remedy several deficiencies found in the Complaint. Complainant filed an amended
Complaint on January 18, 2013. On the same date and in response to the language of
proceedings email communication by the Center, Complainant filed the Complaint in
English. Respondents did not submit any comments in this respect.
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaints satisfied the
formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”
or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”),
and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
In accordance with the Rules, paragraphs 2(a) and 4(a), the Center formally notified
Respondents of the Complaint, and the proceedings commenced on January 31, 2013. In
accordance with the Rules, paragraph 5(a), the due date for Response February 20, 2013.
A Response was filed by Total Play Inc. with the Center on February 20, 2013 with respect
to all disputed domain names.
The Center appointed Pablo Palazzi, Alvaro Loureiro Oliveira and David W. Quinto as
panelists in this matter on March 18, 2013. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted.
Each member of the Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of
Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the
Rules, paragraph 7.
4. Factual Background
Complainant TV Azteca S.A.B. de C.V. is a Mexican telecommunications company that
provides services related to radio, television and Internet in Mexico and around the world.
Complainant operates the two television networks, Azteca 7 and Azteca Trece with
affiliated stations in most cities in Mexico and the Americas.
In November 2011, Complainant was awarded a license in Colombia to operate the
national fiber optic with the aim of providing broadband Internet service under the
trademark TOTALPLAY.
The disputed domain names <total-play.com.co>, <totalplay.com.co> and
<mitotalplay.com.co> were registered on November 5, 14 and 17, 2011 respectively. The
disputed domain names <total-play.co> and <total-play.com> were registered on
September 8, 2012, and December 21, 2012 respectively.
5. Parties’ Contentions
A. Complainant
Complainant alleges that it is the owner in Mexico of 206 registrations for the trademark
TOTALPLAY in several classes. Complainant has also applied for these trademarks in
Colombia.
In addition, Complainant states that it owns registrations of the domain names
<totalplay.com>, <mitotalplay.com.mx> and <totalplay.com.mx> where the TOTALPLAY
trademark is promoted in regards to Internet, interactive TV and optical fiber services.
Complainant’s registration of its trademarks in Mexico predates Respondents’ registration
of the disputed domain names <total-play.com.co>, <totalplay.com.co> and

38
<mitotalplay.com.co>. The disputed domain names were registered respectively on
November 5, 14 and 17, 2011.
Complainant claims the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to the
TOTALPLAY trademark.
Complainant states that prior to learning of the entry into Colombia of Complainant TV
Azteca with the TOTALPLAY trademarks, as reported in several news media on
November 4, 2011, Respondents were not known in Colombia for a name consisting in
whole or in part of the TOTALPLAY trademarks. The disputed domain names were
registered only after the entry of Complainant in Colombia was announced. Thus,
Respondents do not have any legitimate interest in the disputed domain names.
According to the Complaint, Respondents are not using the disputed domain names to
offer goods or services in good faith. The disputed domain names are a façade to conceal
their lack or legitimate rights of interest over them.
Complainant asserts that the disputed domain names were registered and are being used
in bad faith. The disputed domain names were registered with the purposes of selling,
renting, or transferring them to Complainant for an amount that exceeds the documented
costs directly related to the disputed domain names.
According to the Complaint, Respondent Johny Alfonso Romero Rocha tried to sell the
disputed domain names one month after registering them, and following a first offer made
by a representative of the Complainant. The required sum of USD 50,000 for the domain
names exceeds the cost directly related to the registration of the disputed domain names
and is an act of bad faith.
In addition, Complainant stated that registration of multiple domain names with the same
trademarks as that of the Complainant is a registration in bad faith. Complainant cites the
case ECOPETROL AMERICA INC. v. JOHNY ALFONSO ROMERO ROCHA, NAF Claim
No. 1450566, as an evidence of the same Respondent incurring in a pattern of registration
of domain names that incorporate famous trademarks.
According to the Complaint, another sign of bad faith is the use of a privacy proxy service
in the registration of some of the disputed domain names.
Complainant requests as a remedy the transfer of the disputed domain names.
B. Respondents
The Response was filed by Total Play Inc. with respect to all the disputed domain names,
In the Response, under the heading “Respondent’s contact details”, it is indicated “name:
Johny Romero and/or Total Play Inc.”
Respondents state that Complainant does not have rights to bar legitimate uses in
commerce for those areas that are non-conflicting with that of Complainant. Respondents
attached United States registration (number 4243480)for TOTALPLAY. Respondents also
state they have a Colombian trademark registration for TOTALPLAY.
Respondents state that they have legitimate rights to use the domain name for their goods
and services by virtue of its United States registration for TOTALPLAY for goods in
international class 25. Respondents also argue that they were using the TOTALPLAY
trademark in commerce since as early as October 2011 in the United States. Respondents
registration of their domain names in the present proceeding were to promote their
legitimate use in commerce for its clothing line, with no relation to Complainant’s products
or services.
According to Respondents, Complainant claims that Respondents offer to sell the domain
names for USD 50,000 was in bad faith, but it fails to take into account that Respondents
have been using its trademark in commerce in the United States and had built up good will
behind the name prior to Complainant media foray. Respondents would only sell the
domain name and as a result give up the good will of its business for an amount that would
make financial sense to Respondents considering the long terms business goals of a
successful clothing line.

39
Respondents state that the offer was not in bad faith because Complainant’s
representative real identity was not disclosed. In addition, Respondents state that the offer
did not include only the cost of registration but also took into account other factors such as
legal and government fees to file trademarks both in the United States and abroad, the
goodwill behind their clothing company, and cost to create inventory, merchandise
branding and clothing specimen/tags for retail sales.
Respondents submit as Annex 4 photos of TOTALPLAY clothing specimens to show their
legitimate use in commerce, with branding, clothing tags, examples of articles clothing and
retail ready clothing.
Respondents state that at the date of Complainant notice to Respondents about its alleged
rights, Respondents had already obtained a registration of its United States trademark,
which precludes Complainant claim that Respondents simply held the domain name with
an intention to block Complainant use of the domain names.
Respondents deny the use of a fake address. According to Respondents, the address
listed in the United States is a listed address of Respondents United States operations and
thus is not fraudulent or incorrect.
According to Respondents, the registration of two or three domain names does not
constitute a pattern of bad faith registration for purposes of section 4(b)(ii) of the Policy.
Finally, Respondents state that their use of data and privacy protection services are simply
an effort to not authorize third party contacts for spam or marketing.
6. Discussion and Findings
Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy provides that to divest a respondent of a disputed domain
name, a complainant must demonstrate each of the following:
(i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in
which the Complainant has rights; and
(ii) the respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name; and
(iii) the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
Under paragraph 15(a) of the Rules, “A Panel shall decide a complaint on the basis of the
statements and documents submitted and in accordance with the Policy, these Rules and
any rules and principles of law that it deems applicable.”
A. Identity of the Respondents
An important preliminary issue in this case concerns the identity of Respondents.
The Complaint was filed with the Center on December 21, 2012, in Spanish. The only
named Respondent at that time was Johnny Alfonso Romero Rocha.
On December 24, 2012, the Center transmitted by email to both Registrars a request for
registrar verification in connection with the disputed domain names.
GoDaddy.com, LLC informed the Center that the registrant of the domain names <total-
play.co> and <total-play.com> was Total Play Inc. and not Johny Alfonso Romero Rocha.
Central Comercializadora de Internet S.A.S. transmitted by email to the Center its
verification response confirming that Johny Romero is listed as the registrant and providing
the contact details for the disputed domain names <mitotalplay.com.co>, <total-
play.com.co> and <totalplay.com.co>. The contact details informed for these domains
where the following:
JOHNY ROMERO
[…]@totalplay.biz
TOTAL PLAY INC

40
The Center sent an email communication to the Complainant providing the registrant and
contact information disclosed by the Registrar, and requesting the Complainant to submit
an amendment to the Complaint to 1) add the registrant of record for the disputed domain
names <total-play.co> and <total-play.com> and to demonstrate that both registrants are,
in fact, the same entity or that the disputed domain names are under common control or 2)
file a separate Complaint in relation to the domain names <total-play.co> and <total-
play.com>, and file a short amendment to drop said separately-filed domain names from
the current Complaint.
On January 11, 2013, the Center received an informal communication from Respondent
Total Play Inc. requesting to receive the text of the Complaint for review and stating that
the owner of the five domain names was Total Play Inc. On the same date, Johnny Alfonso
Romero Rocha sent an email communication to the Center expressing that “Johnny
Alfonso Romero Rocha is not the owner of the disputed domain names” and requesting
not to receive any more email communications related to this matter to his electronic
address.
Complainant filed an amended Complaint on January 15, 2013, indicating the connection
or relationship between the disputed domain names and their listed domain name holders.
According to the Complaint, Johny Alfonso Romero Rocha and Total Play Inc. is the same
person. Thus, the amended Complaint in English was filed against both Johny Alfonso
Romero Rocha and Total Play Inc.
With respect to the identity of Respondents, the Panel notes that Johny Romero is
mentioned as registrant in the WhoIs record of three of the five disputed domain names. In
addition, Respondents have attached the full email communication between Respondents
and a Complainant’s employee as Annex 5. In that email communication, the person who
presents himself as the owner of three of the disputed domain names and offers to sell
them is Johny Alfonso Romero Rocha. Johny Romero appears also as administrative and
technical contact in three of the disputed domain names, where Total Play Inc. is the
registrant. In addition, the five disputed domain names currently have the same identical
content. Furthermore, in the Response, Respondents provided the following information
with respect to contact details: “Johny Romero and/or TOTAL PLAY INC.”.
Thus, the Panel is further satisfied that the disputed domain names registered by Johny
Alfonso Romero Rocha (aka Johny Romero) and Total Play Inc. are all subject to common
control and that it is appropriate, equitable and fair to all parties involved to consolidate this
proceeding.
B. Language of the proceedings
The Center communicated to the parties that the language of the registration agreements
is English and Spanish. On January 18, 2013 and in response to the language of
proceedings email communication by the Center, Complainant filed the amended
Complaint in English. Respondents did not submit any comments in this respect. However,
Respondents answered the Complaint in English.
Complainant requested that Spanish be the language of the proceeding taking into
account that (i) Spanish is the native language of the Parties, (ii) the respective domiciles
of the parties are in Mexico and Colombia, where Spanish is the official language, and (iii)
the registration agreements of the registrars are available in Spanish on the Internet.
The language of the registration agreements of the disputed domain names is both English
and Spanish. However, in light of the consolidation of the five disputed domain names in
one case, the fact that both parties were able to file their Complaint and Response in
English, the Panel decides that English is the language of the proceedings.
C. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Complainant is the owner of several trademark registrations for TOTALPLAY in Mexico.
Respondents are not contesting this issue, so the Panel accepts that the registered
trademarks for TOTALPLAY are valid and subsisting.
The disputed domain names <mitotalplay.com.co>, <total-play.com.co>,
<totalplay.com.co>, <total-play.co> and <total-play.com> are confusingly similar to
Complainant’s trademark.

41
For the purpose of comparison of the disputed domain names with the trademark, the
extensions “.com” and “.co”, can be ignored as trivial. The same can be said of the hyphen
“-” available in three of the five disputed domain names.
Finally, one of the disputed domain names contains the prefix “mi”. The Panel notes that
Complainant has a similar domain name in use that starts with the “mi” prefix (see
<mitotalplay.com.mx>) used to provide information and configuration of the service to its
clients in Mexico. The disputed domain name <mitotalplay.com.co> is also confusingly
similar to Complainant’s trademark and its domain name, <mitotalplay.com.mx>.
Respondents allege that Complainant has not registered the trademark TOTALPLAY in
class 25 (for clothing products) and that Respondents own such trademark registration in
the United States and in Colombia.
Under the Policy, if the Complainant owns a trademark, then it generally satisfies the
threshold requirement under the first element. The location of the trademark, its date of
registration, and the goods and/or services for which it is registered, are all irrelevant for
the purpose of finding rights in a trademark under the first element of the UDRP.
See WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions Second
Edition (“WIPO Overview 2.0”), paragraph 1.1.
Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Complainant has met the first requirement of the
Policy.
D. Rights or Legitimate Interests
The following are examples of circumstances where a respondent may have rights or
legitimate interests in a contested domain name:
“(i) before any notice to you of the dispute, your use of, or demonstrable preparations to
use, the domain name or a name corresponding to the domain name in connection with
a bona fide offering of goods or services; or
(ii) you (as an individual, business, or other organization) have been commonly known by
the domain name, even if you have acquired no trademark or service mark rights; or
(iii) you are making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the domain name, without
intent for commercial gain to misleadingly divert consumers or to tarnish the trademark or
service mark at issue.” (Policy, paragraph 4(c)).
Once a prima facie case is made by a complainant, it becomes the respondent’s burden to
demonstrate its rights or legitimate interests. If it fails to do so, the Complainant is deemed
to have satisfied to paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy. See, e.g., paragraph 2.1 of WIPO
Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Second Edition (“WIPO
Overview 2.0”).
Respondents argue that they have a valid trademark registration for TOTALPLAY in
Colombia and the United States.
According to the record (Annex 1 of the Response), the trademark TOTALPLAY is
registered in the United States since November 13, 2012 for class 25 in the name of a
company called GripGuard Inc.
The Response does not provide a copy of the Colombian trademark registration. The only
document attached as Annex 2 of the Response is a decision from the Colombian
trademark office dated February 11, 2013, rejecting Complainant’s registration for the
trademark TOTALPLAY in class 24. Nonetheless, the Panel visited the website for the
Colombian trademark office and was able to verify that the trademark TOTALPLAY for
class 25 is also registered in the name of GripGuard Inc.
The decision from the Colombian trademark office dated February 11, 2013, rejecting the
registration of Complainant’s application for TOTALPLAY trademark in class 24 addressed
two grounds: the TOTALPLAY trademark owned by GripGuard Inc. and the Totalplay
tradename. The Colombian Trademark Office decision however, was based only on the
TOTALPLAY trademark. With respect to the Totalplay tradename, the Colombian
trademark office stated that the mere deposit of a tradename in the office does not
constitute proof of its use and that GripGuard Inc. had not proved use of the Totalplay
tradename.

42
The Panel notes that the listed owner of the trademark registration referred to by
Respondents is GripGuard Inc., a third party in this proceeding. There is no mention of
such company in the WhoIs registration of any of the disputed domain names, or in the
Response, and Respondents have not stated that they have a license or any other valid
title to use the trademark TOTALPLAY from such company. Thus, the argument that
Respondents have a valid trademark is not supported by the record and cannot be
accepted by the Panel.
In sum, given that there is no demonstrated relationship between Gripguard Inc. and
Respondents, it is the view of the Panel that Respondents do not have registered
trademark rights over the term TOTALPLAY, which can form the basis for claiming rights
on legitimate interests in the disputed domain names.
The Panel notes that Johny Alfonso Romero Rocha may arguably be associated with
GripGuard Inc., the owner of the two trademark registrations referred to by Respondents.
Indeed, it appears from Annex 2 of the Response, that Johny Alfonso Romero Rocha
might have acted as the representative of GripGuard Inc. at some point in the past. In the
Panel’s view, this however is not sufficient to conclude that Respondents in this case have
rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain names for the purpose of the second
element of the UDRP. Indeed, the Panel notes that the registration of the disputed domain
name <totalplay.com.co> occurred on November 5, 2011, only one day after it became
public knowledge that Complainant was entering the Colombian market to operate the
national fiber optic with the aim of providing broadband Internet service under the
trademark TOTALPLAY and that all the other disputed domain names were also registered
after this information became public. Panels have generally declined to find respondent
rights or legitimate interests in a domain name on the basis of a corresponding trademark
registration where the overall circumstances demonstrate that such trademark was
obtained primarily to circumvent the application of the UDRP, WIPO Overview of WIPO
Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Second Edition, 2.7 (“WIPO Overview 2.0“). In
light of the above, even if the Panel were to associate Respondents with GripGuard Inc.’s
trademarks, this would not suffice given the circumstances described above, to conclude
that Respondents have rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain names.
In relation to the existence and activity of Respondents under the name Totalplay, the
Panel notes the following facts:
- In November 2011, Complainant was awarded a license to operate a national fiber optic
for broadband Internet service in Colombia;
- This was widely publicized in several newspapers in Colombia on November 4, 2011.
There are also newspapers clips dated October 25, 2011 that identified Totalplay as the
likely candidate to win the public tender for fiber optic.
- The disputed domain names were registered on November 5, 14 and 17, 2011, and then
on September 8, 2012, and December 21, 2012.
- On December 12, 2011 Respondent Johny Alfonso Romero Rocha received an email
communication from a representative of Complainant (without disclosing identity) asking if
he was willing to sell the domain name <totalplay.com.co>. Several emails followed up.
Respondent first stated that he was using the domain name to sell kits of machines and
accessories. The Panel notes that such use would be inconsistent with a class 25
registration. He added that he had already been successful and obtained two sales for
USD 25,000 and USD 125, 000 respectively. He offered also to sell the social media
accounts associated with the domain name. Finally, Respondent stated that he had
additionally registered <total-play.com.co> and <mitotalplay.com.co> and offered to sell all
the domain names for the sum of USD 50,000. In the Response, Respondents state that
they have a successful clothing business and that they have been using the trademark
TOTALPLAY in commerce since October 2011.
The assertions are contradictory and lack any material evidence or supporting
documentation. Respondents pretend to offer clothes, but they have not provided any
evidence of a physical location or online ordering system, actual sales, invoices,
expenditures, clients or any other demonstrable preparations for a serious and credible
business. The assertions of a successful business and goodwill are not supported by any
kind of evidence, except some photos of shirts bearing the “Totalplay” logo. The

43
photographies of trousers on the websites of the disputed domain name do not even have
the trademark.
The consensus view is that the general standard of proof under the UDRP is "on balance"
- often expressed as the "balance of probabilities" or "preponderance of the evidence"
standard. Under this standard, an asserting party would typically need to establish that it is
more likely than not that the claimed fact is true. (see, paragraph 4.7, WIPO Overview 2.0).
The Panel finds that the criteria enunciated in paragraph 4(c) criteria of the Policy have not
been demonstrated and that without any evidence of their alleged rights or legitimate
interests in the disputed domain names, Respondents have not rebutted
Complainant’s prima facie case that Respondents lack rights or legitimate interests.
The Panel therefore finds that the Complainant has satisfied what was required of it under
Paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy.
E. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
According to paragraph 4(b) of the Policy, the following circumstances shall be evidence of
registration and use in bad faith:
“(i) circumstances indicating that you have registered or you have acquired the domain
name primarily for the purpose of selling, renting, or otherwise transferring the domain
name registration to the complainant who is the owner of the trademark or service mark or
to a competitor of that complainant, for valuable consideration in excess of your
documented out-of-pocket costs directly related to the domain name; or
(ii) you have registered the domain name in order to prevent the owner of the trademark or
service mark from reflecting the mark in a corresponding domain name, provided that you
have engaged in a pattern of such conduct; or
(iii) you have registered the domain name primarily for the purpose of disrupting the
business of a competitor; or
(iv) by using the domain name, you have intentionally attempted to attract, for commercial
gain, Internet users to your website or other on-line location, by creating a likelihood of
confusion with the complainant's mark as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or
endorsement of your website or location or of a product or service on your website or
location.”
Each of those circumstances requires, or at least implies, that a respondent must have
known, or ought to have known, of the complainant or its trademark rights and that the
domain name was registered with those rights in mind.
In light of all the evidence available, it is the view of the Panel that the disputed domain
names were registered with the purposes of selling, renting, or transferring them to the
Complainant for an amount that exceeds the documented costs directly related to the
domain name.
The following circumstances are taken into account:
- Respondents registered five domain names comprising Complainant’s trademarks.
- The disputed domain names were registered after the public announcement in several
newspapers that Complainant was awarded a public tender to install fiber optic in
Colombia.
- Respondents registered the disputed domain name <mitotalplay.com.co> on November
17, 2011. This disputed domain name contains the same prefix “mi” that Complainant is
using in the domain name <mitotalplay.com.mx>, which is used by Complaint to provide to
its clients access to information about its service and to provide them personalized
configuration in Mexico.
- Respondents have provided contradictory explanations of what they are doing with the
domain name.
- Respondent Johny Alfonso Romero Rocha has already been a party to other
proceedings in which he was found to have acted in bad faith in registering several

44
variations of domain names including the trademark ECOPETROL. This establishes a
pattern of conduct. - Respondent Johny Alfonso Romero Rocha offered to sell the
disputed domain names for a sum exceeding out-of-pocket expenses. In November 2011,
Complainant was awarded a license to operate the national fiber optic system of Colombia
under the trademark TOTALPLAY. This was widely publicized by the Colombian
newspapers “Portafolio”, “Semana” and “El Espectador” on November 4, 2011. The
documents attached to the Complaint also contain two notes published on October 25,
2011, reflecting that some newspapers were already mentioning the possible entry into
Colombia of the trademark TOTALPLAY. Respondents registered the first disputed
domain name on November 5, 2011, just one day after it became public knowledge that
TOTALPLAY was entering the Colombian market. Then on December 12, 2011, a
representative of Complainant sent an email to Respondent Johny Alfonso Romero Rocha
inquiring if he would sell the disputed domain names. He offered to sell them for USD
50,000 and mentioned a successful business selling machines and accessories. The
Panel notes that Respondents registered the disputed domain names before GripGuard
Inc. registered its trademarks in the United States and in Colombia. The Panel also notes
that the offer to sell the disputed domain names made by Johny Alfonso Romero Rocha,
was made before said trademarks were registered. Respondent Johny Alfonso Romero
Rocha was thus interested in selling the disputed domain names within days of registering
them. In the view of this Panel, it is surprising that Respondent Johny Alfonso Romero
Rocha was purportedly using them to sell machines and accessories. No evidence of this
was offered in the Response. It is also suggestive that after a few emails with the
representative, Respondent Johny Alfonso Romero Rocha also offered to sell two other
domain names containing the trademark TOTALPLAY. There is no explanation why
Respondents offered an unknown person a domain name containing the prefix “mi” with
the trademark TOTALPLAY and the ccTLD for Colombia “.co”. The only plausible answer
is that Respondent Johny Alfonso Romero Rocha knew he was dealing with Complainant’s
representative and was aware of the importance of the disputed domain names for
Complainant’s new business in Colombia. With respect to the offer to sell, Respondents
argue that the sum includes all the investment and goodwill of Complainant in a successful
clothing business. Such bare assertion lacks any evidence of the investment, goodwill,
existing clientele or invoices. As already stated in the previous section of this decision,
Respondents have offered only conclusory assertions but not evidence to support them.
With respect to the application of the pattern of registering domain names forbidden by
paragraph 4(b)(ii) of the Policy, Respondents state that “[…] Panels have held that the
registration of two or three names does not constitute a pattern of bad faith registration for
purposes of the 4(b)(ii) requirement”. The Panel disagrees. The consensus view states
that a pattern of conduct can involve multiple UDRP cases with similar fact patterns or a
single case involving the registration of multiple domain names similar to a trademark
(see Paragraph 3.3, WIPO Overview 2.0). In this case, Complainant was awarded a tender
to operate in Colombia. Just days after it was publicly announced, Respondents registered
the disputed domain names. It is the view of the Panel that Respondents registered the
disputed domain names in order to prevent the owner of the trademarks from reflecting the
mark in a corresponding domain name. The Panel notes that it is not casual that of the five
disputed domain names, four of them relate to the “.co” ccTLD that relates to Colombia,
where Complainant has been granted a license to operate. The Panel also notes that the
fact pattern of this case is similar to that of the Ecopetrol case, cited by Complaint
(see Ecopetrol America Inc. v. JOHNY ALFONSO ROMERO ROCHA, NAF Claim No.
1450566). There, Respondent Johny Alfonso Romero Rocha registered a package of
domain names and social media accounts and offered them to Complainant. The seven
domain names involved in that case were: <ecopetrolamerica.com>,
<ecopetrolamerica.co>, <ecopetrolamerica.net>, <ecopetrolamerica.org>,
<ecopetrolamerica.info>, <ecopetrolamerica.mobi>, and <ecopetrolamerica.biz>.
There are two additional NAF cases related to Respondent Johny Alfonso Romero Rocha
involving the domain names <ecopetrol.co> and <ecopetrol.us> (Ecopetrol America Inc. v.
JOHNY ALFONSO ROMERO ROCHA, NAF Claim No. 1450584 and 1450580).
In all the cases, Respondent Johny Alfonso Romero Rocha was found to be acting in bad
faith. In sum, the Panel finds that Respondents registered the disputed domain names to
prevent the owner of the trademark from reflecting its mark in a corresponding domain
name, and Respondents have engaged in a pattern of such conduct.
Accordingly, the Panel finds that Complainant has met the third requirement of the Policy.
7. Decision

45
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the disputed domain names <mitotalplay.com.co>, <total-play.co>, <total-play.com>, <total-
play.com.co> and <totalplay.com.co> be transferred to Complainant.
Pablo Palazzi
Presiding Panelist
Alvaro Loureiro Oliveira
Panelist
David, W. Quinto
Panelist
Date: April 9, 2013
PRUEBAS DOCUMENTALES:
1) ACUERDO DE CONCILIACION CELEBRADO ENTRE TV AZTECA SAB DE CV,
TOTAL PLAY TELECOMUNICACIONES SA DE CV MEXICO Y AZTECA
COMUNICACIONES COLOMBIA Y POR OTRA PARTE TOTAL PLAY INC Y
TOTALPLAY SAS NIT 900.603.020-0. DOCUMENTO QUE SE INTREGRO EN EL
ESCRITO DE DEMANDA.
2) REGISTROS DE TRANSFERENCIA DE MARCA Y NOMBRE COMERCIAL DE LA
SUPERINTENDENCIA DE INDUSTRIA Y COMERCIO DE COLOMBIA Y DE LA
OFICINA DE MARCAS Y PATENTES DE LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS DE
NORTEAMERICA.
3) REGISTROS BASE WHO IS DE LOS NOMBRE DE DOMINIOS
TOTALPLAY.COM.CO TOTAL-PLAY.COM.CO Y MITOTALPLAY.COM.CO A
NOMBRE DE COLOMBIAN SWEEPER COMPANY CSC SAS NIT 900.360.752-9
4) DOCUMENTO DE IDENTIFICACION NACIONAL CEDULA DE CIUDADANIA DE
JOHNY AFONSO ROMERO ROCHA CC 72.200.057 DE COLOMBIA
5) CAMARAS DE COMERCIO DE TOTALPLAY SAS NIT 900.603.020-0 Y
COLOMBIAN SWEEPER COMPANY CSC SAS NIT 900.360.752-9
6) CARTA ABIERTA DENUNCIA Y DEMANDA PRESENTADA ANTE EL
DEPARTAMENTO DE JUSTICIA DE LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS DE
NORTEAMERICA Y ANTE EL FBI PUBLICADA EN
http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/case-tv-azteca-mexico-obstruction-justice-any-abuse-
one-or-more-undertakings-dominant Y REGISTRADA ANTE LOS DESPACHOS
RESPECTIVOS.
7) RESOLUCION DE DECISION DEL PANEL DE LA OMPI WIPO.
http://www.wipo.int/amc/es/domains/search/text.jsp?case=D2012-2533
NOTIFICACION: TOTALPLAY SAS en la Carrera 34 # 47-23 Oficina # 1 de Barranquilla
Atlantico Colombia. Y a Johny Alfonso Romero Rocha en la Carrera 34 # 47-23 del Barrio
Chiquinquira de Barranquilla Atlantico Colombia.
ATENTAMENTE
JOHNY ALFONSO ROMERO ROCHA
EN CALIDAD DE REPRESENTANTE LEGAL DE TOTALPLAY SAS , COLOMBIAN
SWEEPER COMPANY CSC SAS Y A NOMBRE PROPIO COMO CIUDADANO
COLOMBIANO IDENTIFICADO CON CC 72.200.057 EXPEDIDA EN BARRANQUILLA.

CÁMARA DE COMERCIO DE BARRANQUILLA
CERTIFICADO GENERADO A TRAVÉS DE LAS VENTANILLAS DE LA CCB
FECHA DE EXPEDICIÓN: 16 de Marzo de 2017 Hr:17:22:44 Pag. 1
CÓDIGO DE VERIFICACIÓN: MJ0B6D26FF
RECIBO DE CAJA: 03-95009836
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LA PERSONA O ENTIDAD A LA QUE USTED LE VA A ENTREGAR EL CERTIFICADO
PUEDE VERIFICAR EL CONTENIDO Y CONFIABILIDAD, INGRESANDO A
WWW.CAMARABAQ.ORG.CO OPCIÓN CERTIFICADOS ELECTRONICOS Y DIGITANDO
EL CÓDIGO DE VERIFICACIÓN CITADO EN EL ENCABEZADO. ESTE
CERTIFICADO, QUE PODRÁ SER VALIDADO POR UNA ÚNICA VEZ, CORRESPONDE
A LA IMAGEN Y CONTENIDO DEL CERTIFICADO CREADO EN EL MOMENTO EN QUE
SE GENERÓ EN LAS VENTANILLAS O A TRAVÉS DE LA PLATAFORMA VIRTUAL DE
LA CÁMARA.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CERTIFICADO DE EXISTENCIA Y REPRESENTACION LEGAL O DE INSCRIPCION DE
DOCUMENTOS.
TOTALPLAY S.A.S.------------------------------------------------------
NIT: 900.603.020-0.
"LA MATRICULA MERCANTIL PROPORCIONA SEGURIDAD Y CONFIANZA EN LOS
NEGOCIOS.
RENUEVE SU MATRICULA MERCANTIL A MAS TARDAR EL 31 DE MARZO Y EVITE
SANCIONES DE HASTA 17 S.M.L.M.V.-------------------------------------"
EL SUSCRITO SECRETARIO DE LA CAMARA DE COMERCIO DE BARRANQUILLA, CON
FUNDAMENTO EN LAS INSCRIPCIONES DEL REGISTRO MERCANTIL:
C E R T I F I C A
Que por Documento Privado del 14 de Marzo de 2013, otorgado en
Barranquilla inscrito(as) en esta Cámara de Comercio, el 21 de
Marzo de 2013 bajo el No. 253,005 del libro respectivo, fue
constituida la sociedad-----------------------------------------------
denominada TOTALPLAY S.A.S.-----------------------------------------
C E R T I F I C A
Que de acuerdo con la(s) escritura(s) o el(los) documento(s) arriba
citado(s), la sociedad se rige por las siguientes disposiciones:
DENOMINACION O RAZON SOCIAL:
TOTALPLAY S.A.S.------------------------------------------------------
DOMICILIO PRINCIPAL: Barranquilla.
NIT No: 900.603.020-0.
MATRICULA MERCANTIL: 565,880.
C E R T I F I C A
Direccion Domicilio Ppal.:
CR 34 No 47 - 23 OF 1 en Barranquilla.
Email Comercial: info@totalplaycolombia.com
Telefono: 3043878883.
********** C O N T I N U A **********
Signature Not Verified

Pag. 2
DOCUMENTOS.
TOTALPLAY S.A.S.------------------------------------------------------
NIT: 900.603.020-0.
Direccion Judicial:
Email Notific. Judicial: info@totalplaycolombia.com
Telefono: 3043878883.
C E R T I F I C A
DURACION: Que la sociedad no se halla disuelta y su término de
duración es INDEFINIDO.
C E R T I F I C A
OBJETO SOCIAL: La sociedad tendrá como objeto social principal las
siguientes actividades: La comercialización, fabricación, compra,
venta, importación, exportación y distribución de prendas,
sombrerería, zapatos es decir blusas, pantalones, jeans, camisetas,
polos, sudaderas. sudaderas con capuchas, faldas, vestidos,
suéteres, abrigos, chaquetas, y demás accesorios comprendidos en la
clase 25 internacional de Niza, ropa de la marca americana
TOTALPLAY cuyo nombre comercial y marca están registrados en
Colombia, y la concesión y venta de franquicias TOTALPLAY en la
República de Colombia, Cuyos derechos en Colombia ejerce la firma
por autorización de la oompañía americana TOTAL PLAY INC con sede
en NEW YORK, N.Y. USA 5.2) La sociedad podrá dedicarse a todas las
actividades que más adelante se expresen a saber: a) Establecer,
gestionar, y llevar a cabo en general todo tipo de negocios,
incluyendo, financiamiento, inversiones, correduría, garantía,
consultoría, suscripción y venta de valores, operaciones
mercantiles, fabricación, importación, expedidores de carga,
construcción, ingenieria, arquitectura. comercio marítimo,
transporte, Publicidad, fletamento y arrendamiento, actividades
agrónomas, de auditoría, hotelería, alimentos, bebidas, ropa,
minería, pesquería, de exploración, comunicaciones, y de almacenaje
y, en general llevar a cabo cualquier otro comercio, negocio,
-industria, tráfico, empresa o actividad lícita, sean o no
similares o relacionados con los objetos antes mencionados. b)
Comprar, adquirir, arrendar, o de otro modo recibir y vender,
enajenar, ceder, comerciar, permutar, pignorar, hipotecar, gravar,
arrendar, conceder licencia o disponer de cualesquiera bienes y
derechos reales o personales ya sean tangibles o intangibles,
muebles o inmuebles, incluyendo bonos, hipotecas, acciones u otros
valores, productos , obligaciones, concesiones, opciones, pólizas
comprobantes de deuda, contratos y derechos, conocimientos de
embarque, recibos, documentos negociables o no negociables,
patentes, licencias, marcas de fábricas, nombres comerciales,
inventos, derechos de autor, denominaciones comerciales, logos y
diseño de todo tipo, mercancías, naves, aeronaves, y demás
embarcaciones, minas, derechos y concesiones mineras,
********** C O N T I N U A **********

Pag. 3
DOCUMENTOS.
TOTALPLAY S.A.S.------------------------------------------------------
NIT: 900.603.020-0.
bosques,canteras, Pesquerías y fábricas; y mientras fuera dueña de
las mismas, ejercer todos los derechos, facultades y privilegios de
dominios perteneciente a ellos y recibir todos los alquileres,
intereses, dividendos y producto de los mismos. c) dar o tomar
dinero en préstamo o hacerse responsable por el Pago de dinero como
principal, codeudor o garante, traspasar bienes en fideicomiso o
grabarlos con prenda, hipoteca o de otro modo en garantía de
obligaciones de la sociedad o de terceros d) comprar, redimir o de
otro modo adquirir, girar, endosar, descontar, tener, vender,
pignorar, transferir, emitir o de otro modo enajenar acciones de su
propio capital, bonos u otros valores, obligaciones o comprobantes
de deudas, celebrar y llevar a cabo contratos y arreglos de toda
clase y para cualquier fin lícito, con cualquier persona o compañía,
entidad, gobierno o autoridad. e) Vender, arrendar o de otro modo
disponer de la totalidad o de cualqu-er parte del activo, derechos,
o bienes de la sociedad. f) tener una o más oficinas; y llevar a
cabo y conducir todas y cualquiera de sus operaciones y negocos en
cualquier país del mundo. g) Repartir en especie, en concepto de
dividendo o por otro conoepto, entre los accionistas, directores,
dignatarios, clientes o empleados de la sociedad, cualquier bien o
activo de la sociedad. h) Adquirir, asumir o emprender la totalidad
o cualquier parte del negocio, bienes o pasivos de cualquier persona
o compañía y organizar, constituir, reorganizar, fusionarse, o
consolidarse y ayudar financieramente o de otra manera a cualquier
subsidiaria, afiliada y a otra compañía. i) Establecer, sostener o
ayudar en el establecimiento de asociaciones, fondo u
organizaciones no lucrativas y contribuir a cualesquiera propósitos
caritativos o benévolos que se determine como provechosos para el
negocio o interés general de la sociedad o sus accionistas j) En
general llevar a cabo cualquier negocio lícito en cualquier parte
del mundo y hacer todos o cualesquiera los actos y cosas que
antecedan, ya sea como poderdante, factor, mandatario, agente,
corredor, apoderado, contratista o de otro carácter, ya sea socio
en compañía con otros y ya sea mediante mandatarios o agentes fuera
incidental o conducente al logro de todos o cualesquiera de los
objetos que anteceden derivados de la existencia de actividades de
la sociedad.--------------------------------------------------------
C E R T I F I C A
CAPITAL Nro Acciones Valor Acción
Autorizado
$************100,000,000 ***************100,000 *****************1,000
Suscrito
$**************1,000,000 *****************1,000 *****************1,000
Pagado
$**************1,000,000 *****************1,000 *****************1,000
********** C O N T I N U A **********

Pag. 4
DOCUMENTOS.
TOTALPLAY S.A.S.------------------------------------------------------
NIT: 900.603.020-0.
C E R T I F I C A
ADMINISTRACION:La representación legal de la sociedad será ejercida
por el Gerenle General. El Gerente General tendrá la representación
legal y extrajudicial de la sociedad y en especial las siguientes
funciones entre otras: Ejecutar y celebrar todos los actos,
operaciones y contratos de cualquier naturaleza y de cualquier
cuantía, comprendidos dentro del acto objeto social de conformidad
con lo previsto en las leyes y en lo referente a las reclamaciones
ante la DIAN y otras facultades oficiales, tendrá amplias
facultades para solicitar las devoluciones de los saldos a favor de
la sociedad sin limite de cuantía. Dar o tomar dinero en préstamo o
hacerse responsable por el pago de dinero como el principal,
codeudor o garante, traspasar bienes en fideicomiso o grabarlos con
prenda, hipoteca o de otro modo en garantía de obligaciones de la
sociedad o terceros, comprar, redimir, o de otro modo adquirir,
girar, endosar, descontar, tener, vender, pignorar, transferir,
emitir o de otro modo enajenar acciones del capital social, bonos y
otros valores, obligaciones o comprobantes de deudas de la
sociedad, empresa, señalarles sus funciones y su remuneración.
Representar a la sociedad ante los accionistas y ante toda clase de
autoridades del orden administrativo y jurisdiccional. Constituir
mandatarios que representen a la sodedad en negocios judiciales o
extrajudiciales y delegar las funciones o atribuciones necesarias
que el mismo goza. Abrir cuentas bancarias en Colombia y/o en el
extranjero y designar las personas autorizadas para firmar cheques,
letras de cambio, Pagares, u otro instrumento cambiario o otros
documentos de la compañia relacionados con las cuentas bancarias.
Celebrar los contratos de alquiler o arrendamiento de bienes
muebles e inmuebles de la compañía necesarios dentro del giro
ordinario de los negocios. El representante legal suplente,
reemplazará en las ausencias temporales y/o absolutas al
Representante Legal y tendrá las mismas funciones del Representante
Legal de la Sociedad.-----------------------------------------------
C E R T I F I C A
Que por Documento Privado del 14 de Marzo de 2013, otorgado en
Barranquilla inscrito en esta Cámara de Comercio, el 21 de Marzo de
2013 bajo el Nro 253,005 del libro respectivo, fueron hechos los
siguientes nombramientos:
Cargo/Nombre Identificación
Gerente General.
Romero Rocha Stephanie Patricia CC.******1129573224
Representante Legal Suplente
Romero Rocha Johny Alfonso CC.********72200057
C E R T I F I C A
********** C O N T I N U A **********

Pag. 5
DOCUMENTOS.
TOTALPLAY S.A.S.------------------------------------------------------
NIT: 900.603.020-0.
Que en esta Cámara de Comercio no aparecen inscripciones posteriores
de documentos referentes a reforma, disolución, liquidación o
nombramientos de representantes legales de la expresada sociedad.
C E R T I F I C A
Que su última Renovación fue el: 08 de Marzo de 2017.
La información sobre embargos de establecimiento se suministra en
Certificados de Matrícula, la de contratos sujetos a registro, en
Certificados Especiales.
C E R T I F I C A
De conformidad con lo establecido en el Código de Procedimiento
Administrativo y de lo Contencioso y de la Ley 962 de 2005, los
Actos Administrativos de Registro aquí certificados quedan en firme
Diez (10) días hábiles después de la fecha de inscripción, siempre
que no sean objeto de recursos.
______________________________________________________________________
LA CAMARA DE COMERCIO DE BARRANQUILLA INFORMA QUE POR SU CONDUCTO
EL COMERCIANTE:
TOTALPLAY S.A.S.----------------------------------------------------
HA REALIZADO LOS SIGUIENTES TRÁMITES:
INSCRIPCIÓN EN EL REGISTRO DE INDUSTRIA Y COMERCIO DE LA SECRETARÍA
DE HACIENDA PÚBLICA DEL DISTRITO DE BARRANQUILLA.
NOTIFICACIÓN DE LA APERTURA DE SU(S) ESTABLECIMIENTO(S) DE COMERCIO
ANTE LA SECRETARIA DE PLANEACIÓN DEL DISTRITO DE BARRANQUILLA.
______________________________________________________________________

CÁMARA DE COMERCIO DE BARRANQUILLA
CERTIFICADO GENERADO A TRAVÉS DE LAS VENTANILLAS DE LA CCB
FECHA DE EXPEDICIÓN: 16 de Marzo de 2017 Hr:17:22:48 Pag. 1
CÓDIGO DE VERIFICACIÓN: JT0B6D27FF
RECIBO DE CAJA: 03-95009837
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LA PERSONA O ENTIDAD A LA QUE USTED LE VA A ENTREGAR EL CERTIFICADO
PUEDE VERIFICAR EL CONTENIDO Y CONFIABILIDAD, INGRESANDO A
WWW.CAMARABAQ.ORG.CO OPCIÓN CERTIFICADOS ELECTRONICOS Y DIGITANDO
EL CÓDIGO DE VERIFICACIÓN CITADO EN EL ENCABEZADO. ESTE
CERTIFICADO, QUE PODRÁ SER VALIDADO POR UNA ÚNICA VEZ, CORRESPONDE
A LA IMAGEN Y CONTENIDO DEL CERTIFICADO CREADO EN EL MOMENTO EN QUE
SE GENERÓ EN LAS VENTANILLAS O A TRAVÉS DE LA PLATAFORMA VIRTUAL DE
LA CÁMARA.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CERTIFICADO DE MATRICULA DE PERSONA JURIDICA.
TOTALPLAY S.A.S.------------------------------------------------------
NIT: 900.603.020-0.
"LA MATRICULA MERCANTIL PROPORCIONA SEGURIDAD Y CONFIANZA EN LOS
NEGOCIOS.
RENUEVE SU MATRICULA MERCANTIL A MAS TARDAR EL 31 DE MARZO Y EVITE
SANCIONES DE HASTA 17 S.M.L.M.V.-------------------------------------"
EL SUSCRITO SECRETARIO DE LA CAMARA DE COMERCIO DE BARRANQUILLA, CON
FUNDAMENTO EN LAS MATRICULAS E INSCRIPCIONES DEL REGISTRO MERCANTIL:
C E R T I F I C A
Que:
TOTALPLAY S.A.S.------------------------------------------------------
Nit: 900.603.020-0.
C E R T I F I C A
Matrícula No. 565,880, registrado(a) desde el 21 de Marzo de 2013.
C E R T I F I C A
Que su última Renovación fue el: 08 de Marzo de 2017.
C E R T I F I C A
Direccion Domicilio Ppal.:
Email Comercial: info@totalplaycolombia.com
Telefono: 3043878883.
Direccion Judicial:
Email Notific. Judicial: info@totalplaycolombia.com
Telefono: 3043878883.
********** C O N T I N U A **********
Signature Not Verified

Zompiconsolidadointernationaowipo

Zompiconsolidadointernationaowipo

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Colombian Sweeper Co CSC SAS

More from Colombian Sweeper Co CSC SAS (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Zompiconsolidadointernationaowipo