SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 26
Download to read offline
1 University of Oregon Investment Group
Covering Analysts: Gregg Anderson
and Charles Pontrelli
May 1, 2015
Consumer Goods
Investment Thesis
The recent acquisition of Harris Teeter and Vitacost.com provides Kroger
the opportunity to further penetrate and capitalize on the fast-growing
online, southeast and Mid-Atlantic markets. Successful penetration, via
Harris Teeters’ numerous locations and established brand, will result in
additional market share and diversification for Kroger’s revenue streams.
Kroger’s wide variety of stores and brands, spanning across 36 states,
provides various price points and value for nearly all consumers. This
unique diversity allows Kroger to adapt to shifting consumer trends and
maintain stable revenue streams.
Considering a proven management team, geographic diversification, clear
growth strategies, and little downside risk, Kroger offers investors a value
play.
The Kroger Company
Ticker: KR
Current Price: $70.55
Recommendation: Outperform
Price Target: $83.47
Five-Year Stock Chart
0
5000000
10000000
15000000
20000000
25000000
30000000
35000000
40000000
45000000
$0.00
$10.00
$20.00
$30.00
$40.00
$50.00
$60.00
$70.00
$80.00
$90.00
Apr-10 Oct-10 Apr-11 Oct-11 Apr-12 Oct-12 Apr-13 Oct-13 Apr-14 Oct-14
Volume Adj Close 50-Day Avg 200-Day Avg
Key Statistics
52 Week Price Range $44.72 - $77.74
50-Day Moving Average $75.33
Estimated Beta 0.63
Dividend Yield 1.00%
Market Capitalization (mm) $35,741.25
3-Year Revenue CAGR 3.88%
Trading Statistics
Diluted Shares Outstanding (mm) 502.41
Average Volume (3-Month) (mm) 4.32
Institutional Ownership 83.50%
Insider Ownership 6.11%
EBITDA Growth (2015E) 4.63%
Margins and Ratios
Gross Margin (2015E) 21.15%
EBITDA Margin (2015E) 4.67%
Net Margin (2015E) 1.58%
Debt to Enterprise Value 0.31
UOIG 2
University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015
Business Overview
The Kroger Company (Kroger) was founded in 1883 by Bernard Kroger in
Cincinnati Ohio as a grocery store, and was incorporated in 1902. They
currently trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker KR. Their
headquarters are in Cincinnati, Ohio. Kroger is now the largest supermarket
chain in America, the second-largest general retail chain behind Walmart, and
the fifth largest retailer in the world. They operate domestically in 36 states,
with over 3500 stores. Kroger also employs approximately 400,000 full- and
part- time employees, with the majority of these employees being covered by
collective bargaining agreements. There are approximately 300 bargaining
agreements that can range from three to five years.
Kroger’s stores consist of supermarkets, convenience stores, and jewelry stores.
In addition, their supermarkets operate under a few different formats:
combination food and drug stores, multi-department stores, marketplace stores,
and price impact warehouses. The majority of the supermarkets function under
the combo store format, which offer natural food and organic sections,
pharmacies, general merchandise, pet centers, and seafood and meat. Their
multi-department stores offer everything the combo stores offer, as well as
apparel, home furnishings, outdoor living, automotive products, electronics,
toys, and fine jewelry. Marketplace stores are a little smaller than multi-
department stores, but have similar offerings, and the price impact warehouses
offer a “no frills, low cost” warehouse format, similar to that of Costco.
Kroger operates a considerable amount of brands to meet every customer’s
needs. Their supermarkets stock over 13,000 private label items, on average.
Kroger’s corporate brand products are essential to their merchandising strategy,
and are separated into three tiers: premium, quality, and value. Private Selection
brand is designed to compete with other “gourmet” or “upscale” brands.
Kroger’s banner brands, such as Kroger, Ralph’s, Fred Meyer, King Scoopers,
and newly acquired Harris Teeter represent the majority of their private label
items, and are included under the quality tier. Before banner brand products are
carried in their stores, Kroger does extensive product quality testing to make
sure that the customers will be extremely satisfied, and Kroger has a satisfaction
guarantee. They also offer brands such as P$$T, Check This Out…, and
Heritage Farm, which fall under the value tier. These brands provide good
quality at a very low price. Kroger has also grown other brands extensively.
For example, their new brands Simple Truth and Simple Truth Organic provide
food free of artificial preservatives and ingredients, and Simple Truth Organic
has been certified organic by the USDA.
In 2013, Kroger announced they would acquire Harris Teeter, super market
chain based in the southeast portion of the United States. They acquired Harris
Teeter for $2.5 billion and assumed $100 million of Harris Teeter’s debt. This
acquisition gave Kroger access to Harris Teeter’s click and collect program,
which allows customers to order their groceries online and then pick them up in
a nearby store. Also, Kroger announced on March 3, 2015 that they will be
expanding their operations to Hawaii, which currently has Safeway, Wal-Mart,
Costco, Honolulu-based Foodland and Times, as well as Department of
Defense-owned DeCA Commissaries. Kroger is still deciding on whether they
will use the Kroger name or another banner brand, such as Fred Meyer or QFC.
Figure 1: Kroger Employee Growth
Source: Kroger 10-K
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000
400000
450000
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014
TotalEmployees
Figure 2: Kroger Store Breakdown
Source: Kroger 10-K
70%
21%
9%
Supermarkets and Multi-Department Stores Convenience Stores Jewelry Stores
Figure 3: Kroger Identical Store Sales
Source: Kroger 10-K
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
2000A 2002A 2004A 2006A 2008A 2010A 2012A 2014A
Millions($)
UOIG 3
University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015
Industry
Overview
The Kroger Company operates in the Consumer Goods sector and the
Supermarkets and Grocery Stores industry. Businesses in this industry sell
general food products, including canned and frozen foods, fresh produce, fresh
and prepared meats, poultry, and seafood, and dairy products. Many companies
in this industry also provide ancillary household products and appliances. There
are approximately 42,036 businesses in this industry. While this is not a
relatively large industry, the competition level is very high. Kroger holds the
largest market share in this industry with approximately 15.4%. Safeway
follows behind with a 6.6% market share, then Publix Super Markets Inc. at
5.5%, followed by the rest of the industry. The majority of these companies
operate domestically.
Competition is very high in this industry due to supermarkets and grocery stores
competing fiercely for sales by offering discounts and promotions. Companies
like Kroger depend on their size and purchasing power to provide the lowest
prices. Goods within the industry are relatively homogeneous, so businesses
must compete on price. However, there has been a growing trend with
consumers of buying an increasing amount of natural and organic goods. This
allows companies to charge a higher price on their goods and boost revenues.
However, as organic and natural foods become more common with the
consumers, stores have to compete on price of those goods, as well.
Even though competition is relatively stiff in the industry, the market
concentration is very low. Reports estimate that over a third of the businesses
operating in this industry employ five or less employees. On top of that, the top
four companies account for approximately 30% of revenue in 2014. Most of the
players in the industry are small- to medium-sized companies, and operate in
local or regional markets. Even though this industry is segmented,
concentration has increased over the last few years with many mergers and
acquisitions by the industry leaders.
The Supermarkets and Grocery Stores industry has relatively low capital
intensity. It is estimated that for every dollar spent on labor in the industry, 9
cents will be spent on capital. Capital expenditures usually go towards the
purchase of buildings, as well as store assets, such as cash registers, shelving,
refrigerators, etc. Still, capital expenditures have been increasing due to the
expansion into online shopping, the addition of self-checkout systems, and
computerized point-of-sale systems. This industry demands a high amount of
labor because of the amount of work it takes to stock shelves, organize
inventories, and provide customer service. However, the amount of workers in
the industry has declined the past 5 years with the implementation of self-
checkout systems. Still, wages have increased because of the general economic
trend of increasing minimum wage standards.
While technology change has traditionally been low in this industry, there have
been many developments in the recent future that have changed the industry.
For example, the aforementioned self-checkout systems. Additionally, many
grocery store and supermarket chains are offering online ordering and
smartphone ordering, where customers can order from their computer or phone
and then have their purchases delivered to them or they can pick them up at a
nearby store. These same stores also offer online coupons and promotions so
that consumers can have access to their deals wherever they go. One of the
Figure 4: Industry Market Share
Source: IBIS World
Kroger 15.40%
Safeway, Inc. 6.60%
Publix Super Markets, Inc. 5.50%
Other 72.50%
Life Cycle Stage Mature
Revenue Volatility Low
Capital Intensity Low
Industry Assistance Low
Concentration Level Low
Regulation Level Medium
Technology Change Medium
Barriers to Entry Medium
Industry Globalization Low
Competition Level High
Figure 5: Industry Structure
Source: IBIS World
6.4% 7.3%
4.0% 4.6%
9.1% 9.7%
74.0%
75.4%
0.9% 0.9%
2.0%
0.6%3.5% 1.5%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Sector Industry
Other Rent & Utilities Wages Purchases Depreciation Marketing Profit
Figure 6: Sector vs. Industry Costs
Source: IBIS World
UOIG 4
University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015
latest technological advancements in the industry is the Pay By Touch system.
Consumer can set up a profile or “e-wallet” with the store that stores their bank
account, reward card, and/or credit card information. When they shop at the
store, the consumer only needs to provide their fingerprint and a passcode in
order to pay for their groceries. This provides for an easier and more secure way
of shopping.
The Supermarket and Grocery Stores utilizes a few metrics to measure company
performance, the two primary metrics being sales per square foot and same store
sales. Kroger has had positive same store sales growth for 45 straight quarters,
and is expected to continue this trend in the future. They also have relatively
high sales per square foot. It is expected that sales per square foot will continue
to increase due to Kroger focusing on operational efficiency and increasing their
offerings of natural and organic goods. This will be discussed later in the report
with the revenue model.
Macro factors
US Population
Total US Population is one macroeconomic factor that affects total sales.
Because supermarkets and grocery stores offer primarily necessities like food,
they have relatively stable revenue streams. Still, the more people that shop at
their store, the greater amount of revenue they will have. Additionally, Kroger
is trying to raise their sales per square foot by bringing in more customers. With
a higher total US Population, Kroger can capitalize on more customers. Total
US Population was factored into the revenue regression, and was projected into
2021 at approximately a .8% growth rate year over year. It is expected that the
US Population will continue to grow at a steady growth rate such as this one.
Producer Price Index
Another significant macroeconomic factor that drives the industry is the
Producer Price Index, or PPI. Because grocery stores and supermarkets compete
fiercely on prices to attract customers, they are highly affected by how much it
costs to produce their goods. The Producer Price Index measures relative
production costs for businesses and the items the produce. Therefore, the lower
the PPI, the better companies can compete in the industry. If the PPI rises, it
becomes more difficult for operators in the industries to provide competitive
prices. However, for larger companies such as Kroger and Safeway, they can
keep their costs low through economies of scale. It is also moderately easy to
pass on the additional costs to the consumer.
Per Capita Disposable Income
Per Capita Disposable Income refers to the average amount of money each
person in the United States has to spend on goods and services, after taxes,
savings, and some non-tax payments are factored in. Per Capita Disposable
Income has a positive correlation with normal goods. While it has a moderate
effect on grocery store and supermarket sales, it has increasingly become a
larger factor, due to businesses providing more natural and organic foods, which
cost more. Consumers are willing to spend more on these premium products
because of their growing disposable income. Kroger has been capitalizing on
this growth with their Simple Truth and Simple Truth Organic products.
Competition
Competition in the Supermarket and Grocery Store industry is relatively high
due to large players in the space, as well as the fierce price competition and
Figure 7: Industry Segmentation
Source: IBIS World
19.10%
12.10%
11.40%
11.30%
8.40%
3.10%
2.20%
32.40%
Beverages Dairy Products Frozen Foods
Non-Food Items Fresh and Frozen Meat Drugs and Health Products
Fruit and Vegetables Other Food Items
250000
270000
290000
310000
330000
350000
370000
2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018 2021 2024
TotalUSPopulation(thousands)
Figure 8: Total US Population
Source: FRED and UOIG Spreads
50
100
150
200
250
300
2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018 2021 2024
ProducerPriceIndexLevel
Figure 9: Producer Price Index
Source: FRED and UOIG Spreads
UOIG 5
University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015
aggressive expansion. Additionally, the introduction of online markets has
increased competition as businesses are now able to reach a wider customer
base. While most of the companies in this industry operate in small local and
regional markets, there are a few large players that dominate the market.
It is estimated that four companies represented approximately 30% of revenue in
2014. Kroger leads these companies, with an estimated 15% market share. Its
largest competitors in the industry are Safeway and Publix, while Costco and
Wal-Mart are its largest competitors outside of the industry. Kroger has been
able to maintain its position through its large product offering, its commitment
to its customers, and its strategic acquisitions, which will be discussed later.
All of the major players in the industry have put a large focus on providing
natural and organic foods for their customers. Now that these natural and
organic foods are becoming more widespread, companies are going to have to
compete on price on these products as well. Traditionally, companies were able
to charge premiums for these foods, but they will be expected to compete on
price in the near future. Kroger owns a very large amount of bakeries, dairy
farms, and other farms that act as local manufacturers and distributors for the
surrounding stores. By owning many of these local manufacturers, they are able
to provide a greater amount of natural and organic foods, without having to
worry about the food products spoiling.
Going into the future, success in the industry will be determined by the
companies that can achieve economies of scale, capture greater market share
than its competitors, and provide a substantial amount of products to meet
consumer needs. Whichever company that is able to offer the lowest price for
comparable goods will attract the most customers, and will be able to enjoy the
greatest market share.
Strategic Positioning
Market Leader
Kroger is the leader in its industry, and continues to grow. Market share is a
very important part of their long-term strategy, and it is the best way to reflect
the success of its products with customers. In addition to increasing revenue
through market share, a greater market share allows Kroger to spread its fixed
costs out over a wider revenue base. To measure its market share, Kroger uses
Nielsen POS+ data. From this data, it is estimated that Kroger’s market share in
the markets in which it operates increased by 60 basis points in 2014. This is
compared to an estimated 50 basis points increase in 2013. Wal-Mart is one of
Kroger’s top two competitors in 15 of the 20 markets that are covered in the
Nielson Report. According to Nielsen, Kroger’s market share increased in all 15
of these markets. Overall, their market share increased in 18 of the markets and
decreased slightly in two of the markets. Kroger plans on growing their market
share in these markets going into the future through the establishment of new
stores, and possible acquisitions.
Merchandising and Manufacturing
Kroger is has one of the largest private label manufacturing networks in the
country. Kroger owns 37 manufacturing plants, which consists of 17 dairies,
nine deli or bakery plants, five grocery product plants, two beverage plants, two
meat plants and two cheese plants. These plants produce 40% of the food
100
150
200
250
300
350
2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018 2021 2024
ConsumerPriceIndexLevel
Figure 10: Consumer Price Index
Source: FRED and UOIG Spreads
Figure 11: Kroger Total Square Footage
Source: Kroger 10-K and UOIG Spreads
120.0
130.0
140.0
150.0
160.0
170.0
180.0
190.0
2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018 2021 2024
MillionsofSquareFeet
Figure 12: Merchandising Costs
Source: Kroger 10-K and UOIG Spreads
0.00
20000.00
40000.00
60000.00
80000.00
100000.00
120000.00
140000.00
2010A 2012A 2014A 2016E 2018E 2020E 2022E 2024E
Millions($)
UOIG 6
University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015
products sold by Kroger and its subsidiaries. The other 60% are produced by
outside manufacturers that follow strict guidelines. Kroger also recently opened
a new, state of the art dairy processing plant in Denver. It is the first dairy in the
United States to use robotic technology that enables Kroger to pack cases and
pick and palletize orders entirely by automation. It produces fresh and organic
milk, and will primarily distribute to Kroger stores in the central United States
Because they own so many of the plants that manufacture their goods, Kroger is
able to lower their manufacturing prices considerably. It also allows them to
ensure that their customers get the highest quality products. These
manufacturing plants are spread out all across the United States. This allows
Kroger to maintain the freshness of their products and reduce transportation
costs.
Acquisitions
On January 28, 2014, Kroger closed their merger with Harris Teeter
Supermarkets, Inc. (“Harris Teeter”) by buying 100% of Harris Teeter stock for
approximately $2.4 billion. This merger allows Kroger to establish itself in the
southeastern and mid-Atlantic markets, as well as Washington, D.C. Both the
southeastern and mid-Atlantic states, on average, have higher population growth
than the United States as a whole, which Kroger will now be able to capitalize
on. Gross margins increased in 2014 because of the merger with Harris Teeter,
which historically has had slightly larger margins than Kroger without Harris
Teeter.
From the merger with Harris Teeter, Kroger gained access to Harris Teeter’s
“click and collect” system, which allows customers to shop on line through
Harris Teeter’s website, and then pick up the products ordered at a nearby Harris
Teeter supermarket. This service has been extremely successful for Harris
Teeter, and Kroger has expanded the service for its Kroger Supermarkets in the
greater Cincinnati area. Kroger has been dabbling with online shopping with its
King Soopers stores in Denver, but now they want to make a big push through
Harris Teeter’s system. While it is still very early since Kroger rolled out the
system into its Kroger Supermarkets, management has had very positive
feedback and expects it to be very popular with consumers.
On August 18, 2014, Kroger closed its merger with Vitacost.com by purchasing
100% of the Vitacost.com outstanding common stock for $8.00 per share,
totaling approximately $287 million. Vitacost.com provides health and wellness
products sold directly through its website. It is a leading online retailer of these
products, and the merger with Vitacost.com gives Kroger access to extensive e-
commerce platform, which can be combined with Kroger’s resources and loyal
customer base, to create an even more personalized experience for customers.
Diversified Store Formats and Product Offerings
As mentioned earlier, Kroger has a variety of different store formats that span
across the United States, ranging from big box retail to convenient stores.
Furthermore, within these stores are a wide array of products that range from
value to premium. The geographic, store, and product diversification provides
Kroger with stable revenues that are protected from regional macroeconomic
trends. Furthermore, Kroger is able to capitalize on a wide array of customers
based on price. Going forward, Kroger will continue to fill their current
channels as well as expand into new markets. The dynamic and proven store
Figure 13: Capital Expenditures Projections
Source: Kroger 10-K and UOIG Spreads
0.00
500.00
1,000.00
1,500.00
2,000.00
2,500.00
3,000.00
3,500.00
4,000.00
4,500.00
2015E 2017E 2019E 2021E 2023E
Millions($)
Figure 14: EBITDA Projections
Source: Kroger 10-K and UOIG Spreads
0.00
500.00
1,000.00
1,500.00
2,000.00
2,500.00
3,000.00
3,500.00
4,000.00
4,500.00
2015E 2017E 2019E 2021E 2023E
Millions($)
Figure 15: Kroger Store Geographical Distribution
Source: Kroger 2013 Factbook
UOIG 7
University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015
formats will provide Kroger the ability to open the type of stores that cater best
to the region they occupy.
Business Growth Strategies
Geographic Growth
Kroger operates exclusively in the United States. They have over 3500 stores
and recently increased their presence in the southeast portion of the United
States, as well as the mid-Atlantic through their acquisition of Harris Teeter,
which closed in early 2014. The southeast United States is rapidly growing, and
has outpaced the population growth of the United States as a whole in the past
few years and is projected to keep this pace. Kroger’s sales success is greatly
determined by the amount of people that shop at their stores. Therefore, the fast
growing population of the southeast should bolster their revenue streams.
In early 2015, Kroger registered as a company in Hawaii, and recently registered
their pharmaceutical segment as well. Hawaii is currently home to chains such
as Albertson, Safeway, Wal-Mart, Japan-based Don Quijote, and various local
stores. However, since the Albertsons-Safeway merger, the future of the
Albertson’s stores in Hawaii has been uncertain, and provides an opportunity for
Kroger to expand its business. Kroger, with its pricing power and superior
management, should be able to compete and thrive in the Hawaiian market, even
with high rental rates and land costs. This expansion will boost sales and market
share.
Organic Growth
Kroger is the Supermarket and Grocery Store industry leader, and is committed
to maintain its position as such. Kroger management believes that the best way
for their business to grow is not through acquisitions or mergers, but through
organic growth and the development of its core operations. One way they are
fostering organic growth and operational efficiency is through the buying out of
their current leases. Kroger management believes that by buying out these
leases they will reduce costs in the long run, as well as provide more flexibility
with their stores. Kroger plans on increasing their capital expenditures in the
next few years in order to finance these lease buyouts. Additionally, they plan
to remodel stores in order to keep them up to date and attractive to customers.
Another way Kroger believes they can grow their business is through the
development of their store associates. They believe that by providing their
workers with good compensation and exceptional training, they can boost sales
and retain customers. Nationally, on average, Kroger associates make an
average $14 an hour, compared to $8.81 an hour for Wal-Mart associates. When
you include the benefits that Kroger provides its workers, this average is much
higher. By taking care of their associates, Kroger can better provide for its
customers and their needs, which ultimately leads to higher sales, better
margins, and increased customer loyalty.
Acquisitions and Online Retail
In 2014, Kroger closed two mergers: one with Harris Teeter Supermarkets, and
one with Vitacost.com. While the merger with Harris Teeter was primarily for
Kroger to expand its operations into the central and southeastern portions of the
Figure 16: 2013 Capital Investment Allocation
Source: Kroger 2013 Factbook
49%
19%
15%
3%
14%
Major Supermarket (including real estate)
Minor Supermarket
Supermarket Support (Tech & Logistics)
Other Retail
Other
Figure 17: Net Income vs. OG&A Expense
Source: Kroger 10-K
0.00
5000.00
10000.00
15000.00
20000.00
25000.00
2010A 2012A 2014A 2016E 2018E 2020E 2022E 2024E
Millions($)
Figure 18: OG&A Expense per Employee
Source: Kroger 10-K and UOIG Spreads
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014
Dollars
UOIG 8
University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015
east coast of the United States, Kroger also acquired its proprietary “click and
collect” online system. This system has been very successful at Harris Teeter
supermarkets, and Kroger is currently testing it at some of its supermarkets in
the greater Cincinnati area. Additionally, the merger with Vitacost.com allows
Kroger to expand its online offerings even more.
With many retail chains, such as Wal-Mart, Amazon, and Safeway expanding
their online retail services into fresh produce and food, it is very beneficial for
Kroger to expand as well. These services are relatively new in the Supermarket
and Grocery Store Industry, so by entering the market now, Kroger can leverage
its pricing power to attract customers through the reduction of delivery costs.
Many of Kroger’s competitors, such as Safeway, charge up to $14.99 in delivery
costs. Kroger is known for being able to provide the lowest price on quality
prices, and Kroger will be able to do the same with its online orders. By adding
these online retail options, Kroger can bring in more customers, and provide a
more personalized shopping experience.
Proliferation of Natural and Organic
A recent trend that has emerged in the United States is the natural and organic
foods trend. Coinciding with increased awareness in nutrition, many Americans
have begun to more actively seek out natural and organic groceries. Originally,
stores like Whole Foods, New Seasons, and Market of Choice enjoyed a first-
mover’s advantage, offering unique natural products and brands in which
consumers were willing to pay a premium for. However, in the last two years,
Kroger has also been able to capitalize on this trend by offering some of the
same brands that Whole Foods and other organic stores offer. Furthermore,
Kroger has also created a private label, known as “Simple Truth,” which has
seen sales rise to $1.2 billion in 2014, just two years after launch. Where
previously consumers had to pay a premium to access organic and natural foods,
the introduction of Simple Truth and other brands allows consumers to access
comparable foods at a much lower price. The success of Simple Truth and
Kroger’s other private labels are a significant driver of revenue and allow
Kroger to take market share away from Whole Foods and other comparable
stores. Going forward, Kroger will continue to develop their brands in order to
maintain and capitalize on this growing trend.
Management and Employee Relations
W. Rodney McMullen – Chairman and CEO
Rodney McMullen is the current Chairman and CEO of Kroger. He joined
Kroger in 1978 as a part-time stock clerk in Lexington, KY. Before his current
position, he was the President and the Chief Operating Officer. He was named
Chairman of the Board earlier this year. Mr. McMullen earned a bachelor’s
degree in Accounting, a B.B.A. in Finance, and a master’s degree in Accounting
from the University of Kentucky.
Michael L. Ellis – President and COO
Mike Ellis is currently the President and Chief Operating Officer of Kroger.
Mike joined Fred Meyer at the age of 16, and has advanced through the ranks up
to his current position. Prior to President and COO, he was the senior vice
president of Kroger’s retail divisions.
Figure 19: Key Management Compensation vs.
Net Income
Source: Kroger 10-K and UOIG Spreads
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
2010 2011 2012 2013
Millions($)
Millions($)
Key Executive Compensation Net Income
Figure 20: EPS Guidance vs. Actuals
Source: Kroger 10-K and UOIG Spreads
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
2012 2013 2014
EPS($)
Low High Actual
UOIG 9
University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015
J. Michael Schlotman – Senior Vice President and CFO
Mike Schlotman is currently the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of Kroger. Mike joined Kroger in 1985, and has held a variety of
leadership positions. He was named group vice president and chief financial
officer in 2000, and was named senior vice president in 2003. Mike earned his
bachelor’s degree in Accounting from the University of Kentucky
Geoffrey J. Covert – Senior Vice President
Geoffrey Covert is the current Senior Vice President of Kroger. He joined
Kroger in 1996 as vice president of the Grocery Products Group. In 2010, Geoff
was promoted to senior officer of Kroger’s Retail Operations at General Office.
He was named to his current role in 2012. Before Kroger, Geoff worked for 22
years in various management positions at Procter & Gamble Co. He received
his bachelor’s degree in Chemical Engineering at Case Western Reserve
University.
Management Guidance
Management provides guidance on revenue and EPS for their operations in each
fiscal year. Management does not break out their revenue into segments, but
instead reports total sales. In recent years, management has consistently met, or
beaten their guidance. The revenue model is slightly above management
guidance, due to management’s trend to provide beatable guidance. For the
fiscal year of 2015, management estimates EPS will between $3.80 and $3.90 a
share and sales will be between $111.7 billion and $112.8 billion.
Portfolio Strategy
Kroger is not currently held in any of the University of Oregon Investment
Group’s portfolios. At the moment, the Tall Firs portfolio is underweight in
large cap stocks and overweight in consumer goods. While Tall Firs is
overweight in Consumer Goods, the portfolio would benefit from additional
exposure and diversity to the food and grocery space. Currently, Costco is the
only holding that provides this exposure. By adding Kroger to the portfolio, Tall
Firs would be better aligned with the market capitalization distribution of the
benchmark. Even though Tall Firs is overweight consumer goods, the strong
management, consistent top- and bottom-line growth, and its position as a
market leader make Kroger a very attractive value buy.
Recent News
Wal-Mart and Target Are Being Crushed by Supermarkets in
the Business of Selling Food – TheStreet – Friday April 17th
2015
Traditional supermarkets like Kroger and Safeway are outperforming mass
merchants like Wal-Mart and Target in selling fresh food and packaged goods.
In the past year, Kroger posted double digit same-store sales growth, leading to
investors pushing up Kroger’s stock price by 66% in the past year, compared to
3.2% and 36% increases by Wal-Mart and Target, respectively.
Select pieces of important current news and state explicitly how they affect your
company, its stock price, and/or the industry.
Figure 21: Revenue Regression Projections
Source: Kroger 10-K and UOIG Spreads
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
180000
2015E 2017E 2019E 2021E 2023E
Millions($)
CPI PPI US Population
One-Year Stock Chart
0
2000000
4000000
6000000
8000000
10000000
12000000
14000000
16000000
$0.00
$10.00
$20.00
$30.00
$40.00
$50.00
$60.00
$70.00
$80.00
$90.00
Nov-13 Jan-14 Mar-14 May-14 Jul-14 Sep-14 Nov-14 Jan-15 Mar-15
Volume Adj Close 50-Day Avg 200-Day Avg
Figure 22: Kroger 1 Year Stock Chart
Source: Yahoo Finance
Figure 23: US Disposable Income per Capita
Source: FRED
30000
31000
32000
33000
34000
35000
36000
37000
38000
39000
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014
Dollars
UOIG 10
University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015
Kroger Honored by EPA as a 2015 ENERGY STAR® Partner
of the Year – PR Newswire – Wednesday April 8th, 2015
Kroger was recognized as an ENERGY STAR® Partner by the EPA for its
outstanding efforts and actions to improve the energy efficiency of its buildings
and facilities. Kroger has been an ENERGY STAR® Partner since 2010. Some
key factors in Kroger’s energy management program include the
implementation of best practices for refrigeration, lighting, and HVAC,
extensive use of LED lighting in refrigerated cases, and enhanced associate and
customer awareness. Since 2000, Kroger has reduced its average grocery store
electricity usage by 35%.
Catalysts
Upside
Future acquisitions in the United States, particularly in fast growing
urban areas, would allow Kroger to further increase their revenue
streams and national market share
Faster than anticipated adoption of online grocery technology would
allow Kroger to further capitalize on their early position within this
market
As the American market, particularly lower and middle-income
consumers, continue to adopt natural and organic groceries, Kroger’s
established and fast-growing natural and organic brands will allow the
company to further their customer base and capture additional market
share against competitors
Downside
Unexpectedly heightened levels of competition could force Kroger to
further compete on price in order to maintain market, ultimately
resulting in deteriorated margins and reduced free cash flow
Unprecedented disputes between Kroger and their employees could
result in temporarily halted operations that could potentially tarnish the
brand image and result in the loss of customers
Failure to acquire additional grocery chains could result in the loss of
lucrative urban areas and slower than anticipated growth in the coming
years
Comparable Analysis
Kroger is the largest grocer in the United States, operating in over 36 states.
While there are other conglomerates of grocery stores in the United States, most
of these firms are dramatically smaller than Kroger. As a result, the comparable
universe was expanded to include companies in the general food and retail
space. The primary criteria used to screen for comparable companies was size,
revenue and EBITDA growth, operating margins, and a general exposure to the
grocery and food space. Considering the maturity of the industry and the firms
within, EV/EBITDA and P/E were the primary metrics used for benchmarking.
The rationale for EV/EBITDA is primarily that it provides investors with the
truest sense of operational efficiency and cash flows. The rationale for P/E is
Figure 24: US Unemployment Rate
Source: FRED
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014
PercentageUnemployed
Figure 25: Costco 1 Year Stock Chart
Source: Yahoo Finance
One-Year Stock Chart
0
2000000
4000000
6000000
8000000
10000000
12000000
$0.00
$20.00
$40.00
$60.00
$80.00
$100.00
$120.00
$140.00
$160.00
$180.00
Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15
Volume Adj Close 50-Day Avg 200-Day Avg
UOIG 11
University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015
that the maturity of the company and the steadiness of the cash flows make it an
attractive metric for institutional investors and should thus be considered in our
valuation.
COST: Costco Company (35%)
“The company, formerly known as Costco Companies, Inc., was founded in
1976 and is based in Issaquah, Washington. Costco Wholesale Corporation,
together with its subsidiaries, operates membership warehouses. The company
offers branded and private-label products in a range of merchandise categories.
It provides dry and institutionally packaged foods; snack foods, candy, tobacco,
alcoholic and nonalcoholic beverages, and cleaning and institutional supplies;
appliances, electronics, health and beauty aids, hardware, garden and patio, and
office supplies; meat, bakery, deli, and produce; and apparel, small appliances,
and home furnishings. The company also operates gas stations, pharmacies, food
courts, optical dispensing centers, photo processing centers, and hearing-aid
centers; and engages in the travel business.” -Yahoo! Finance
Qualitatively, Costco and Kroger are both large-scale, mature grocers operating
primarily in the United States. While Costco is a warehouse club, requiring a
yearly payment for membership, the two companies directly compete for
consumers and offer many of the same products, including both grocery
products as well as fuel services. Furthermore, both companies compete directly
on price with consumers. Apart from the warehouse membership, Kroger and
Costco have relatively similar business models and similar exposure to
macroeconomic factors, especially in the United States.
Quantitatively, Costco and Kroger are relatively comparable in size, both having
market capitalizations and enterprise values exceeding $35 billion. Revenue and
EBITDA growth is also relatively in line for the two firms. Finally, Kroger and
Costco have very comparable margins.
Comparable business models, similar product offers, direct competition,
comparable margins, and similar exposure to macroeconomic trends are all
factors considered in a 35% weighting of Costco.
SYY: Sysco Company (35%)
“Sysco Corporation, through its subsidiaries, markets and distributes a range of
food and related products primarily to the foodservice or food-away-from-home
industry. It operates in Broadline and SYGMA segments. The company
distributes a line of frozen foods, such as meats, seafood, fully prepared entrees,
fruits, vegetables, and desserts; a line of canned and dry foods; fresh meats;
dairy products; beverage products; imported specialties; and fresh produce. The
company offers its products to the restaurants, hospitals and nursing homes,
schools and colleges, hotels and motels, industrial caterers, and other
foodservice customers through distribution facilities.”
Qualitatively, Sysco and Kroger both operate in the United States and provide
general food products. Both companies have considerable exposure to the food
space within the United States. Sysco does have operations outside of the
United States but their primary operations are within the U.S.
Quantitatively, Sysco is approximately 3/5ths the size of Kroger in both market
capitalization and enterprise value. Both companies have similar volatility and
very comparable Debt/EV. In terms of growth, Sysco and Kroger are directly in
Figure 26: Kroger vs. Costco
Source: UOIG Spreads
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
% Revenue
Growth
2015E
% Revenue
Growth
2016E
% EBITDA
Growth
2015E
% EBITDA
Growth
2016E
% EPS
Growth
2015E
% EPS
Growth
2016E
PercentageGrowth
Kroger Co. Costco Whole Sale
Figure 27: Kroger Margin Projections
Source: UOIG Spreads
20.00%
20.20%
20.40%
20.60%
20.80%
21.00%
21.20%
21.40%
2015E 2017E 2019E 2021E 2023E
GrossMargin
Figure 28: Sysco 1 Year Stock Chart
One-Year Stock Chart
0
2000000
4000000
6000000
8000000
10000000
12000000
14000000
$31.00
$32.00
$33.00
$34.00
$35.00
$36.00
$37.00
$38.00
$39.00
$40.00
$41.00
$42.00
Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15
Volume Adj Close 50-Day Avg 200-Day Avg
Source: Yahoo Finance
UOIG 12
University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015
line in terms of Revenue, EBIT, and EBITDA going into the NTM. In terms of
margins, Kroger and Sysco have very comparable margins across the board.
As a result of similar exposure to the United States food space, size, volatility,
capital structures, growth prospects and margins, Sysco received a 35%
weighting.
WMT: Wal-Mart Stores (20%)
“The company was founded in 1945 and is headquartered in Bentonville,
Arkansas. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. operates retail stores in various formats
worldwide. The company operates through three segments: Walmart U.S.,
Walmart International, and Sam’s Club. It operates discount stores,
supermarkets, supercenters, hypermarkets, warehouse clubs, cash and carry
stores, home improvement stores, specialty electronics stores, restaurants,
apparel stores, drug stores, and convenience stores, as well as retail Websites,
such as walmart.com and samsclub.com.” –Yahoo! Finance
Qualitatively, Walmart and Kroger are both large-scale retailers that operate
primarily in the United States. Walmart currently has some international
operations and will continue to look for opportunities to expand. Kroger
currently only operates in the United States and currently has no plans to expand
outside of the United States. While Kroger primarily offers grocery products,
Wal-Mart has a more diversified offering of products, including grocery
products. Both Kroger and Wal-Mart have various store formats and generally
compete over the same consumer through price and promotion.
Quantitatively, Walmart is dramatically larger than Kroger in terms of market
capitalization and enterprise value. The two companies share similar betas.
Margins are relatively similar for the two firms and growth prospects are both
representative of mature companies within the space.
Due to the massive size disparity between Walmart and Kroger and different
product offers, Wal-Mart received only a 20% weighting in the comparable
valuation.
TGT: Target Company (5%)
“Target Corporation was founded in 1902 and is headquartered in Minneapolis,
Minnesota. Target Corporation operates as a general merchandise retailer in the
United States and Canada. It offers household essentials, including pharmacy,
beauty, personal care, baby care, cleaning, and paper products; music, movies,
books, computer software, sporting goods, and toys; electronics, such as video
game hardware and software; and apparel for women, men, boys, girls, toddlers,
infants, and newborns, as well as intimate apparel, jewelry, accessories, and
shoes. The company also provides food comprising dry grocery, dairy, frozen
food, beverages, candy, snacks, deli, bakery, meat, produce, and pet supplies” –
Yahoo! Finance
Qualitatively, Target and Kroger are both large-scale retail companies that offer
grocery products. While Target does have a wider array of other product
offerings, the two companies have similar business models and appeal to similar
consumers. Furthermore, both Kroger and Target primarily operate in the
United States and this trend will continue as Target continues to exit Canada.
Quantitatively, Target and Kroger have very similar market capitalizations and
enterprise values as well as comparable betas. Going into 2015 and 2016, both
Figure 30: Wal-Mart 1 Year Stock Chart
Source: Yahoo Finance
One-Year Stock Chart
0
5000000
10000000
15000000
20000000
25000000
$0.00
$10.00
$20.00
$30.00
$40.00
$50.00
$60.00
$70.00
$80.00
$90.00
$100.00
Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15
Volume Adj Close 50-Day Avg 200-Day Avg
Figure 31: Target 1 Year Stock Chart
Source: Yahoo Finance
One-Year Stock Chart
0
5000000
10000000
15000000
20000000
25000000
30000000
$0.00
$10.00
$20.00
$30.00
$40.00
$50.00
$60.00
$70.00
$80.00
$90.00
Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15
Volume Adj Close 50-Day Avg 200-Day Avg
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
% Revenue
Growth
2015E
% Revenue
Growth
2016E
% EBITDA
Growth
2015E
% EBITDA
Growth
2016E
% EPS
Growth
2015E
% EPS
Growth
2016E
PercentageGrowth
Figure 29: Kroger vs. Sysco
Source: UOIG Spreads
UOIG 13
University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015
firms have comparable growth prospects. However, the two companies have
different margins, particularly in EBIT and EBITDA.
Target and Kroger are comparable in size, business model, geographic
operations, and product offerings. However, considering varying margins,
Target was weighted 5%.
WFM: Whole Foods Market (5%)
“Whole Foods Market, Inc. operates as a retailer of natural and organic foods.
The company’s stores offer produce and floral, grocery, meat, seafood, bakery,
prepared foods and catering, coffee, tea, beer, wine, cheese, nutritional
supplements, vitamins, and body care products, as well as lifestyle products,
including books, pet products, and household products. As of November 5,
2014, the company had 401 stores in the United States, Canada, and the United
Kingdom. Whole Foods Market, Inc. was founded in 1978 and is headquartered
in Austin, Texas”
Qualitatively, Whole Foods and Kroger both operate throughout the United
States and offer grocery products. Whole Foods is generally categorized as a
premium natural and organic foods supplier whereas Kroger is more of a general
grocer. However, a recent trend within Kroger’s stores has been natural and
organic foods produced under their Simple Truth brand, growing to $1.2 billion
in sales in just two years. That being said, there is still a considerable difference
in the type of consumers that Whole Foods and Kroger attracts.
Quantitatively, Whole Foods is approximately half the size of Kroger, has
widely varying margins, and much larger growth rates in the next years.
Considering the qualitative and quantitative factors listed above, Whole Foods
has received a 5% weighting.
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
Revenue Model
The revenue model was created by first calculating historical revenue per square
foot. From there, revenue per square foot was projected out using a Multiple
Linear Regression model. Various factors were screened for the model. Such
factors were Total US Population, Average Disposable Income Per Capita,
National Unemployment Rate, the Producer Price Index, and the Consumer
Price Index. From there, multicollinearity tests were conducted to choose the
proper inputs for the regression.
After running various tests, it was found that Total US Population, the Producer
Price Index, and the Consumer Price Index would be the best predictors of
future revenue per square foot. Instead of including all of these factors in one
regression, however, three separate regressions were used with only one of these
factors, because of the multicollinearity and high standard errors that occurred
when including all 3 factors in one regression. Each of these three regressions
also include three dummy variables that controlled for effects caused by
seasonality.
Once the regression statistics were calculated with each factor, revenue per
square foot was projected into 2024. Total square footage was also projected
out using historical data, management guidance, and a Simple Linear
Regression. This was also forecasted into 2024. To calculate total revenue,
Figure 32: Whole Foods 1 Year Stock Chart
Source: Yahoo Finance
One-Year Stock Chart
0
10000000
20000000
30000000
40000000
50000000
60000000
$0.00
$10.00
$20.00
$30.00
$40.00
$50.00
$60.00
Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15
Volume Adj Close 50-Day Avg 200-Day Avg
Figure 33: Kroger vs. Whole Foods
Source: UOIG Spreads
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
14.00%
% Revenue
Growth
2015E
% Revenue
Growth
2016E
% EBITDA
Growth
2015E
% EBITDA
Growth
2016E
% EPS
Growth
2015E
% EPS
Growth
2016E
PercentageGrowth
Figure 34: Regression Weighting
Source: UOIG Spreads
Multiple Weight
CPI Regression 33.33%
PPI Regression 33.33%
US Population Regression 33.33%
UOIG 14
University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015
each of values of revenue per square foot were multiplied by their respective
total square footage during that quarter. From there, all four quarters of each
year were summed up to produce the total revenue of the year.
For the final revenue model, a weighted average of the revenue models
produced by each of the regressions was used. This allowed the final revenue
model to contain each of the inputs while maintaining a high adjusted R-squared
and minimizing standard errors.
Cost of Goods Sold
Cost of goods sold were projected to slightly increase from 78.74% in 2014 to
79.00% of revenue in the terminal year. The slight increase in cost of goods
sold is meant to reflect a competitive landscape and potential price competition
that will emerge from the recent markets Kroger has entered. Considering that
price is a primary factor in consumers’ decision, Kroger will continue to heavily
compete on price. However, while Kroger will continue to invest in prices, this
increase in cost of goods sold is off-set by the successful implementation of in-
house private brands, including Simple Truth, which have amassed $1.2 billion
in the two mere years since entering Kroger stores.
Operating Expenses
Operating, General and Administrative (OG&A) Expenses:
Operating, General, and Administrative expenses are primarily composed of
employee wages, salaries and benefits. Comparing 2012 to 2014, OG&A
expense as a percentage of revenue has increased by about 50 basis points. In
2012, Kroger re-crafted their strategic plan, shifting towards a more employee
focused direction. The results have, notable in their sales and market
performance, paid off. Kroger has stated that they will continue to move in this
direction as it has been very successful. As a result, we have OG&A increasing
slightly as a percentage of revenue going into the terminal year.
Depreciation and Amortization:
Depreciation and Amortization was projected out as a percentage of beginning
plant, property and equipment. Historical averages were used to determine the
rate as the last 5-years have produced a close band of percentages between
11.42% and 11.58%.
Rent:
Rent is projected to continue to decrease as a percentage of revenue going into
the terminal year as Kroger has recently adopted the philosophy of owning the
land their stores operate on. As noted in the capital expenditures, as Kroger
continues to purchase the leases and land, rent expense as percentage of revenue
will continue to decrease.
Net Working Capital
Working Capital was primarily projected off historical averages and days
outstanding. Two exceptions are accounts receivable and accounts payable
which have shown an increasing and decreasing trend in the past five years. The
models reflect these trends.
Figure 35: CPI Regression Statistics
Source: UOIG Spreads
Multiple R 0.97
R Square 0.94
Adjusted R Square 0.94
Standard Error 7.20
Observations 60
Figure 36: PPI Regression Statistics
Source: UOIG Spreads
Multiple R 0.98
R Square 0.96
Adjusted R Square 0.95
Standard Error 6.29
Observations 60
Figure 37: US Population Regression Statistics
Source: UOIG Spreads
Multiple R 0.96
R Square 0.93
Adjusted R Square 0.92
Standard Error 8.10
Observations 60
Figure 38: Beta Table
Source: UOIG Spreads
Beta SE Weighting
1-Year Daily 0.65 0.08 0.00%
3-Year Daily 0.76 0.05 15.00%
5-Year Daily 0.63 0.03 25.00%
10-Year Daily 0.60 0.02 20.00%
15-Year Daily 0.58 0.02 15.00%
25-Year Daily 0.66 0.02 12.50%
38-Year Daily 0.69 0.02 5.00%
5-Year Weekly 0.58 0.07 0.00%
10-Year Weekly 0.55 0.05 2.50%
Kroger Co. Beta 0.64
UOIG 15
University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015
Capital Expenditures
Capital expenditures primarily consists of costs associate with building new
stores, revamping older stores, and purchasing leases and land. Capital
expenditures are modeled to increase by 14 basis points as a percentage of
revenue in 2018 before trending back towards historical averages. In recent
years Kroger has adopted the philosophy of owning their stores and will
continue to buy-out leases in the coming years.
Beta
The estimated beta for Kroger Company is 0.64. The beta was calculated by
calculating the weighted averages of the Vasicek, Hamada, and regressed betas.
For regressions, the S&P 500 was used as Kroger is a large-cap company. 3, 5,
10, 15, 25, and 38-year dailies were used as well as a 10 year weekly. Each of
the above regressions yielded a close band of betas ranging from 0.55 to 0.76.
Standard errors were the primary criteria used to determine weightings for the
regressions. The weighting of shorter-term and longer-term regressions is
appropriate as it provides both a long-term picture of the stability and
matureness while also reflecting more contemporary evolutions of the industry.
The close band of regressed betas, from both short and long-term periods,
corroborates this.
Hamada and Vasicek betas were also calculated using both comparable
companies and ETFs. The calculated betas were not weighted as the companies
included within our comps and our ETFs are drastically different in both size
and business operations. While they do provide insight into the large industry as
a whole, the regressed betas offer a tight range of betas that are more reflective
of Kroger’s true beta.
Tax Rate
The tax rate was determined using primarily management guidance. Previously
the tax rate has been slightly below the 35% US Corporate tax rate as tax breaks
and credits have been used. However, these breaks and credits are largely
unpredictable and therefore for the sake of conservatism, the US Corporate tax
rate was used.
Cost of Debt
Cost of debt was determined by using a weighted average of current rates on
Kroger’s outstanding debt.
Recommendation
As the leader in its industry and a provider of quality service and products,
Kroger is a strong value play. With consistent revenue growth, strong
management, a commitment to customer service and quality, as well as its
geographic expansion and online retail development, Kroger is poised to
continue its success and even increase its market share. Additionally, its
increased organic and natural offerings will spur revenue and increase its market
share. A weighting of 75% was given to the Discounted Cash Flow Analysis,
while a weighting of 25% was given to the Comparable Analysis, giving a final
Figure 41: Share Sensitivity Table
Source: UOIG Spreads
Figure 40: Tax Rate Sensitivity Table
Source: UOIG Spreads
Figure 39: Beta Sensitivity Table
Source: UOIG Spreads
Undervalued/(Overvalued)
Terminal Growth Rate
0 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0%
0.60 (8.98%) 5.86% 26.50% 57.12% 107.30%
0.62 (12.52%) 1.35% 20.43% 48.34% 93.06%
0.64 (15.88%) (2.90%) 14.79% 40.31% 80.37%
0.66 (19.07%) (6.91%) 9.52% 32.94% 68.99%
0.68 (22.10%) (10.69%) 4.60% 26.14% 58.73%
AdjustedBeta
Undervalued/(Overvalued)
Terminal Growth Rate
0 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0%
25% (19.51%) (7.45%) 8.81% 31.94% 67.48%
30% (17.72%) (5.21%) 11.74% 36.03% 73.73%
35% (15.88%) (2.90%) 14.79% 40.31% 80.37%
40% (13.99%) (.51%) 17.96% 44.81% 87.44%
45% (12.03%) 1.97% 21.26% 49.53% 94.97%
TaxRate
Undervalued/(Overvalued)
Terminal Growth Rate
0 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0%
482 (12.32%) 1.21% 19.65% 46.25% 88.01%
492 (14.10%) (.85%) 17.21% 43.28% 84.19%
502 (15.81%) (2.82%) 14.88% 40.43% 80.52%
512 (17.46%) (4.72%) 12.64% 37.68% 76.99%
522 (19.04%) (6.55%) 10.48% 35.05% 73.60%
Outstanding
Shares
UOIG 16
University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015
price target of $83.47, implying an undervaluation of 18.31%. Because of this
price target, it is recommended that Kroger will outperform and should be added
to the Tall Firs portfolio.
Figure 42: Final Price Target
Source: UOIG Spreads
Source Implied Price Weighting
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis $80.98 75%
Comparable Analysis 90.93 25%
Weighted Implied Price $83.47
Current Price $70.55
Undervalued 18.31%
UOIG 17
University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015
Appendix 1 – Comparable Analysis
Comparables Analysis KR TGT WFM WMT SYY COST
($ in millions) Kroger Co. Target Co.
Whole Foods
Market, Inc.
Wal-Mart
Stores, Inc. Sysco Co.
Costco Whole
Sale
Stock Characteristics Max Min Median Weight Avg. 5.00% 5.00% 20.00% 35.00% 35.00%
Current Price $148.96 $37.77 $79.24 $87.91 $70.55 $83.15 $50.99 $79.24 $37.77 $148.96
Beta 0.96 0.53 0.71 0.68 0.64 0.65 0.96 0.53 0.71 0.71
Size
Short-TermDebt 6,689.00 2.00 311.35 1,871.42 1,885.00 91.00 2.00 6,689.00 311.35 1,200.00
Long-TermDebt 43,692.00 60.00 7,248.46 13,254.11 9,771.00 12,705.00 60.00 43,692.00 7,248.46 3,830.00
Cash and Cash Equivalent 9,135.00 852.00 4,907.68 6,306.34 1,256.00 2,210.00 852.00 9,135.00 4,907.68 7,453.00
Non-Controlling Interest 4,543.00 - 34.94 997.48 30.00 - - 4,543.00 34.94 219.00
Preferred Stock - - - - - - - - - -
Diluted Basic Shares 3,243.00 370.50 592.34 1,060.44 502.41 640.10 370.50 3,243.00 592.34 439.97
Market Capitalization 256,975.32 18,891.80 53,224.32 85,769.84 35,163.48 53,224.32 18,891.80 256,975.32 22,372.79 65,538.57
Enterprise Value 302,764.32 18,101.80 63,334.57 95,586.52 45,593.48 63,810.32 18,101.80 302,764.32 25,059.85 63,334.57
Growth Expectations
% Revenue Growth 2015E 10.93% 1.38% 5.01% 4.64% 4.94% 2.28% 10.93% 1.38% 5.01% 5.58%
% Revenue Growth 2016E 11.23% 2.72% 3.35% 4.61% 4.60% 2.72% 11.23% 3.06% 3.35% 6.09%
% EBITDA Growth 2015E 11.79% -0.54% 7.22% 6.93% 4.51% 7.22% 9.52% -0.54% 5.94% 11.79%
% EBITDA Growth 2016E 10.62% 2.98% 7.90% 7.04% 4.18% 3.57% 10.62% 2.98% 8.50% 7.90%
% EPS Growth 2015E 11.46% -3.17% 6.76% 4.78% 10.24% 6.76% 11.46% -3.17% 6.10% 6.77%
% EPS Growth 2016E 11.84% 5.28% 8.88% 8.26% 10.52% 9.15% 11.84% 5.28% 8.70% 8.88%
Profitability Margins
Gross Margin 35.20% 11.47% 24.31% 18.06% 21.15% 26.45% 35.20% 24.31% 17.45% 11.47%
EBIT Margin 7.54% 2.85% 5.42% 4.17% 2.85% 7.54% 6.47% 5.42% 3.77% 3.05%
EBITDA Margin 10.48% 3.97% 7.37% 5.57% 4.67% 10.48% 9.13% 7.37% 4.94% 3.97%
Net Margin 4.00% 1.58% 3.20% 2.49% 1.58% 3.37% 4.00% 3.20% 2.27% 1.95%
Credit Metrics
Interest Expense $2,487.00 $0.00 $134.00 $615.45 $487.00 $632.00 $0.00 $2,487.00 $134.00 $113.00
Debt/EV 0.30 0.00 0.17 0.18 0.26 0.20 0.00 0.17 0.30 0.08
Leverage Ratio 3.03 0.04 1.39 1.79 2.12 1.76 0.04 1.39 3.03 1.04
Interest Coverage Ratio 42.86 0.00 10.73 24.06 11.27 8.02 0.00 10.73 18.62 42.86
Operating Results
Revenue $492,348.80 $15,745.98 $74,276.89 $163,379.50 $112,500.00 $74,276.89 $15,746 $492,348.80 $50,506.00 $122,090.00
Gross Profit $119,672.34 $5,542.47 $14,002.00 $33,293.74 $23,797.00 $21,944.92 $5,542 $119,672.34 $8,812.00 $14,002.00
EBIT $26,690.31 $1,018.64 $3,718.00 $7,609.71 $3,444.00 $5,067.39 $1,019 $26,690.31 $1,903.00 $3,718.00
EBITDA $36,272.51 $1,437.70 $4,843.00 $10,257.35 $5,489.00 $7,253.35 $1,438 $36,272.51 $2,495.00 $4,843.00
Net Income $15,772.28 $629.16 $2,375.00 $4,562.26 $1,904.00 $2,858.94 $629 $15,772.28 $1,149.00 $2,375.00
Capital Expenditures $12,292.97 $572.00 $2,140.56 $3,677.59 $3,077.00 $2,140.56 $770 $12,292.97 $572.00 $2,495.00
Multiples
EV/Revenue 1.15x 0.41x 0.61x 0.58x 0.41x 0.86x 1.15x 0.61x 0.50x 0.52x
EV/Gross Profit 4.52 1.92 2.91 3.39 1.92 2.91 3.27 2.53 2.84 4.52
EV/EBIT 17.77 11.34 13.17 14.36 13.24 12.59 17.77 11.34 13.17 17.03
EV/EBITDA 13.08 8.31 10.04 10.83 8.31 8.80 12.59 8.35 10.04 13.08
EV/(EBITDA-Capex) 27.13 12.48 13.03 18.51 18.90 12.48 27.13 12.63 13.03 26.97
Market Cap/Net Income = P/E 30.03 16.29 19.47 22.16 18.47 18.62 30.03 16.29 19.47 27.60
Multiple Implied Price Weight
EV/Revenue 108.87 0.00%
EV/Gross Profit 140.02 0.00%
EV/EBIT 77.72 20.00%
EV/EBITDA 97.64 60.00%
EV/(EBITDA-Capex) 68.15 0.00%
Market Cap/Net Income = P/E 84.00 20.00%
Price Target $90.93
Current Price 70.55
Undervalued 28.88%
UOIG 18
University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015
Appendix 2 – Discounted Cash Flows Valuation
DiscountedCash FlowAnalysis
($ in millions) 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 2014A 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E 2023E 2024E
Total Revenue $82,189.00 $90,374.00 $96,751.00 $98,375.00 $108,465.00 $113,818.52 $119,057.50 $124,404.90 $129,861.27 $135,427.16 $141,103.15 $146,889.79 $152,787.66 $158,797.35 $164,919.44
% YoY Growth 7.11% 9.96% 7.06% 1.68% 10.26% 4.94% 4.60% 4.49% 4.39% 4.29% 4.19% 4.10% 4.02% 3.93% 3.86%
Cost of Goods Sold 63,803.00 71,389.00 76,726.00 78,138.00 85,512.00 $89,751.03 $93,901.44 98,139.08 102,464.44 106,877.99 111,380.24 115,971.69 120,652.85 125,424.24 130,286.36
% Revenue 77.63% 78.99% 79.30% 79.43% 78.84% 78.85% 78.87% 78.89% 78.90% 78.92% 78.94% 78.95% 78.97% 78.98% 79.00%
Gross Profit $18,386.00 $18,985.00 $20,025.00 $20,237.00 $22,953.00 $24,067.49 $25,156.05 $26,265.81 $27,396.83 $28,549.17 $29,722.91 $30,918.10 $32,134.81 $33,373.12 $34,633.08
Gross Margin 22.37% 21.01% 20.70% 20.57% 21.16% 21.15% 21.13% 21.11% 21.10% 21.08% 21.06% 21.05% 21.03% 21.02% 21.00%
Operating, General and Adminstrative 13,823.00 15,345.00 14,849.00 15,196.00 17,161.00 18,056.77 18,938.90 19,842.81 20,768.73 21,716.89 22,687.52 23,680.85 24,697.12 25,736.56 26,799.41
% Revenue 16.82% 16.98% 15.35% 15.45% 15.82% 15.86% 15.91% 15.95% 15.99% 16.04% 16.08% 16.12% 16.16% 16.21% 16.25%
Depreciation and Amortization 1,600.00 1,638.00 1,652.00 1,703.00 1,948.00 2,065.51 2,198.11 2,337.29 2,483.07 2,635.50 2,777.73 2,910.34 3,033.84 3,148.64 3,255.07
% of Beginning PP&E 11.58% 11.58% 11.42% 11.47% 11.53% 11.53% 11.53% 11.53% 11.53% 11.53% 11.53% 11.53% 11.53% 11.53% 11.53%
Rent 623.00 619.00 628.00 613.00 707.00 696.16 680.36 660.93 637.74 610.66 579.55 544.30 504.76 460.80 412.30
% Revenue 0.76% .68% .65% .62% .65% .61% .57% .53% .49% .45% .41% .37% .33% .29% .25%
Earnings Before Interest & Taxes $2,340.00 $1,383.00 $2,896.00 $2,725.00 $3,137.00 $3,249.06 $3,338.68 $3,424.78 $3,507.28 $3,586.12 $3,678.11 $3,782.61 $3,899.09 $4,027.12 $4,166.31
% Revenue 2.85% 1.53% 2.99% 2.77% 2.89% 2.85% 2.80% 2.75% 2.70% 2.65% 2.61% 2.58% 2.55% 2.54% 2.53%
Interest Expense 448.00 435.00 462.00 443.00 488.00 480.00 535.76 559.82 584.38 609.42 634.96 661.00 687.54 714.59 742.14
% of Revenue 0.55% .48% .48% .45% .45% .48% .48% .48% .48% .48% .48% .48% .48% .48% .48%
Earnings Before Taxes 1,892.00 948.00 2,434.00 2,282.00 2,649.00 2,769.06 2,802.93 2,864.96 2,922.91 2,976.70 3,043.14 3,121.60 3,211.55 3,312.53 3,424.17
% Revenue 2.30% 1.05% 2.52% 2.32% 2.44% 2.43% 2.35% 2.30% 2.25% 2.20% 2.16% 2.13% 2.10% 2.09% 2.08%
Less Taxes (Benefits) 601.00 247.00 794.00 751.00 902.00 969.17 981.02 1,002.73 1,023.02 1,041.84 1,065.10 1,092.56 1,124.04 1,159.39 1,198.46
TaxRate 31.77% 26.05% 32.62% 32.91% 34.05% 35.00% 35.00% 35.00% 35.00% 35.00% 35.00% 35.00% 35.00% 35.00% 35.00%
Net Income $1,291.00 $701.00 $1,640.00 $1,531.00 $1,747.00 $1,799.89 $1,821.90 $1,862.22 $1,899.89 $1,934.85 $1,978.04 $2,029.04 $2,087.51 $2,153.15 $2,225.71
Net Margin 1.57% .78% 1.70% 1.56% 1.61% 1.58% 1.53% 1.50% 1.46% 1.43% 1.40% 1.38% 1.37% 1.36% 1.35%
Add Back: Depreciation and Amortization 1,600.00 1,638.00 1,652.00 1,703.00 1,948.00 2,065.51 2,198.11 2,337.29 2,483.07 2,635.50 2,777.73 2,910.34 3,033.84 3,148.64 3,255.07
Add Back: Interest Expense*(1-TaxRate) 305.69 321.66 311.29 297.21 321.83 312.00 348.24 363.88 379.84 396.12 412.73 429.65 446.90 464.48 482.39
Operating Cash Flow $3,196.69 $2,660.66 $3,603.29 $3,531.21 $4,016.83 $4,177.39 $4,368.25 $4,563.39 $4,762.81 $4,966.48 $5,168.50 $5,369.04 $5,568.26 $5,766.27 $5,963.17
% Revenue 3.89% 2.94% 3.72% 3.59% 3.70% 3.67% 3.67% 3.67% 3.67% 3.67% 3.66% 3.66% 3.64% 3.63% 3.62%
Current Assets 6,130.00 6,351.00 6,766.00 7,471.00 7,655.00 8,130.60 8,513.96 8,905.89 9,306.45 9,715.70 10,133.71 10,560.54 10,996.27 11,440.95 11,933.77
% Revenue 7.46% 7.03% 6.99% 7.59% 7.06% 7.14% 7.15% 7.16% 7.17% 7.17% 7.18% 7.19% 7.20% 7.20% 7.24%
Current Liabilities 7,482.00 7,790.00 8,327.00 9,048.00 9,518.00 9,921.76 10,341.34 10,746.88 11,160.74 11,578.96 12,001.44 12,430.12 12,864.85 13,305.48 13,751.86
% Revenue 9.10% 8.62% 8.61% 9.20% 8.78% 8.72% 8.69% 8.64% 8.59% 8.55% 8.51% 8.46% 8.42% 8.38% 8.34%
Net Working Capital ($1,352.00) ($1,439.00) ($1,561.00) ($1,577.00) ($1,863.00) ($1,791.16) ($1,827.37) ($1,840.98) ($1,854.29) ($1,863.26) ($1,867.73) ($1,869.58) ($1,868.58) ($1,864.52) ($1,818.09)
% Revenue (1.64%) (1.59%) (1.61%) (1.60%) (1.72%) (1.57%) (1.53%) (1.48%) (1.43%) (1.38%) (1.32%) (1.27%) (1.22%) (1.17%) (1.10%)
Change in Working Capital - ($87.00) ($122.00) ($16.00) ($286.00) $71.84 ($36.21) ($13.61) ($13.31) ($8.97) ($4.47) ($1.85) $1.00 $4.06 $46.43
Capital Expenditures 1,919.00 1,898.00 2,062.00 2,330.00 2,831.00 3,010.55 3,190.78 3,377.61 3,571.18 3,625.12 3,673.78 3,716.92 3,754.33 3,785.77 3,811.01
% Revenue 2.33% 2.10% 2.13% 2.37% 2.61% 2.65% 2.68% 2.72% 2.75% 2.68% 2.60% 2.53% 2.46% 2.38% 2.31%
Acquisitions 7.00 51.00 122.00 2,344.00 252.00 204.87 214.30 223.93 233.75 243.77 253.99 264.40 275.02 285.84 296.85
% Revenue 0.01% .06% .13% 2.38% .23% .18% .18% .18% .18% .18% .18% .18% .18% .18% .18%
UnleveredFree Cash Flow $1,270.69 $798.66 $1,541.29 -$1,126.79 $1,219.83 $890.13 $999.38 $975.47 $971.18 $1,106.56 $1,245.21 $1,389.57 $1,537.91 $1,690.60 $1,808.87
DiscountedFree Cash Flow 846.24 903.25 838.16 793.33 859.35 919.34 975.33 1,026.22 1,072.48 1,090.93
UOIG 19
University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015
Appendix 3 – Revenue Model
Multiple Weight
CPI Regression 33.33%
PPI Regression 33.33%
US Population Regression 33.33%
CPI Regression
Revenue Model
($ in millions) 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 2014A 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E 2023E 2024E
Total Revenue $82,189.00 $90,374.00 $96,751.00 $98,375.00 $108,465.00 $113,859.89 $119,019.96 $124,274.73 $129,624.22 $135,068.40 $140,607.30 $146,240.91 $151,969.22 $157,792.24 $163,709.96
% Growth 7.38% 9.96% 7.06% 1.68% 10.26% 4.97% 4.53% 4.42% 4.30% 4.20% 4.10% 4.01% 3.92% 3.83% 3.75%
PPI Regression
Revenue Model
($ in millions) 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 2014A 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E 2023E 2024E
Total Revenue $82,189.00 $90,374.00 $96,751.00 $98,375.00 $108,465.00 $113,840.85 $118,998.19 $124,250.17 $129,596.80 $135,038.07 $140,573.98 $146,204.54 $151,929.74 $157,749.58 $163,664.06
% Growth 7.38% 9.96% 7.06% 1.68% 10.26% 4.96% 4.53% 4.41% 4.30% 4.20% 4.10% 4.01% 3.92% 3.83% 3.75%
Weighted
Revenue Model
($ in millions) 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 2014A 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E 2023E 2024E
Total Revenue $82,189.00 $90,374.00 $96,751.00 $98,375.00 $108,465.00 $113,818.52 $119,057.50 $124,404.90 $129,861.27 $135,427.16 $141,103.15 $146,889.79 $152,787.66 $158,797.35 $164,919.44
% Growth 7.38% 9.96% 7.06% 1.68% 10.26% 4.94% 4.60% 4.49% 4.39% 4.29% 4.19% 4.10% 4.02% 3.93% 3.86%
US Population Regression
Revenue Model
($ in millions) 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 2014A 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E 2023E 2024E
Total Revenue $82,189.00 $90,374.00 $96,751.00 $98,375.00 $108,465.00 $113,754.82 $119,154.35 $124,689.78 $130,362.78 $136,175.01 $142,128.15 $148,223.92 $154,464.04 $160,850.24 $167,384.30
% Growth 7.38% 9.96% 7.06% 1.68% 10.26% 4.88% 4.75% 4.65% 4.55% 4.46% 4.37% 4.29% 4.21% 4.13% 4.06%
UOIG 20
University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015
Appendix 4 – Working Capital Model
Working Capital Model
($ in millions) 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 2014A 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E 2023E 2024E
Total Revenue $82,189.00 $90,374.00 $96,751.00 $98,375.00 $108,465.00 $113,818.52 $119,057.50 $124,404.90 $129,861.27 $135,427.16 $141,103.15 $146,889.79 $152,787.66 $158,797.35 $164,919.44
Current Assets
Accounts Receivable 845.00 949.00 1,051.00 1,116.00 1,266.00 1,335.96 1,405.27 1,476.56 1,549.85 1,625.18 1,702.56 1,782.03 1,863.61 1,947.35 2,033.25
Days Sales Outstanding A/R 3.75 3.83 3.96 4.14 4.26 4.28 4.31 4.33 4.36 4.38 4.40 4.43 4.45 4.48 4.50
% of Revenue 1.03% 1.05% 1.09% 1.13% 1.17% 1.17% 1.18% 1.19% 1.19% 1.20% 1.21% 1.21% 1.22% 1.23% 1.23%
FIFO Inventory 5,793.00 6,157.00 6,244.00 6,801.00 6,933.00 7,276.68 7,613.19 7,956.76 8,307.44 8,665.28 9,030.30 9,402.56 9,782.09 10,168.94 10,563.14
Days Inventory Outstanding 33.14 31.48 29.70 31.77 29.59 29.59 29.59 29.59 29.59 29.59 29.59 29.59 29.59 29.59 29.59
% of Revenue 7.05% 6.81% 6.45% 6.91% 6.39% 6.39% 6.39% 6.40% 6.40% 6.40% 6.40% 6.40% 6.40% 6.40% 6.41%
LIFO Reserve (827.00) (1,043.00) (1,098.00) (1,150.00) (1,245.00) (1,217.65) (1,273.96) (1,331.45) (1,390.13) (1,450.01) (1,511.09) (1,573.38) (1,636.89) (1,701.62) (1,767.59)
% of FIFO Inventory (14.28%) (16.94%) (17.58%) (16.91%) (17.96%) (16.73%) (16.73%) (16.73%) (16.73%) (16.73%) (16.73%) (16.73%) (16.73%) (16.73%) (16.73%)
% of Revenue (1.01%) (1.15%) (1.13%) (1.17%) (1.15%) (1.07%) (1.07%) (1.07%) (1.07%) (1.07%) (1.07%) (1.07%) (1.07%) (1.07%) (1.07%)
Prepaid and Other Current Assets 319.00 288.00 569.00 704.00 701.00 735.60 769.46 804.02 839.28 875.25 911.94 949.34 987.45 1,026.29 1,104.96
% of Revenue .39% .32% .59% .72% .65% .65% .65% .65% .65% .65% .65% .65% .65% .65% .67%
Total Current Assets $6,130.00 $6,351.00 $6,766.00 $7,471.00 $7,655.00 $8,130.60 $8,513.96 $8,905.89 $9,306.45 $9,715.70 $10,133.71 $10,560.54 $10,996.27 $11,440.95 $11,933.77
% of Revenue 7.46% 7.03% 6.99% 7.59% 7.06% 7.14% 7.15% 7.16% 7.17% 7.17% 7.18% 7.19% 7.20% 7.20% 7.24%
Long Term Assets
Net PP&E Beginning 13,821.00 14,147.00 14,464.00 14,848.00 16,893.00 17,912.00 19,061.92 20,268.89 21,533.14 22,855.00 24,088.39 25,238.42 26,309.40 27,304.91 28,227.87
Capital Expenditures 1,919.00 1,898.00 2,062.00 2,330.00 2,831.00 3,010.55 3,190.78 3,377.61 3,571.18 3,625.12 3,673.78 3,716.92 3,754.33 3,785.77 3,811.01
Acquisitions 7.00 51.00 122.00 2,344.00 252.00 204.87 214.30 223.93 233.75 243.77 253.99 264.40 275.02 285.84 296.85
Depreciation and Amortization 1,600.00 1,638.00 1,652.00 1,703.00 1,948.00 2,065.51 2,198.11 2,337.29 2,483.07 2,635.50 2,777.73 2,910.34 3,033.84 3,148.64 3,255.07
Net PP&E Ending 14,147.00 14,464.00 14,848.00 16,893.00 17,912.00 19,061.92 20,268.89 21,533.14 22,855.00 24,088.39 25,238.42 26,309.40 27,304.91 28,227.87 29,080.67
Total Current Assets & Net PP&E $20,277.00 $20,815.00 $21,614.00 $24,364.00 $25,567.00 $27,192.52 $28,782.85 $30,439.03 $32,161.45 $33,804.09 $35,372.13 $36,869.95 $38,301.18 $39,668.83 $41,014.43
% of Revenue 24.67% 23.03% 22.34% 24.77% 23.57% 23.89% 24.18% 24.47% 24.77% 24.96% 25.07% 25.10% 25.07% 24.98% 24.87%
Current Liabilities
Accounts Payable 4,227.00 4,329.00 4,484.00 4,881.00 5,052.00 5,263.98 5,467.17 5,671.85 5,877.92 6,085.31 6,293.93 6,503.69 6,714.51 6,926.30 7,138.98
Days Payable Outstanding 24.18 22.13 21.33 22.80 21.56 21.41 21.25 21.09 20.94 20.78 20.63 20.47 20.31 20.16 20.00
% of Revenue 5.14% 4.79% 4.63% 4.96% 4.66% 4.62% 4.59% 4.56% 4.53% 4.49% 4.46% 4.43% 4.39% 4.36% 4.33%
Accrued Salaries and Wages 888.00 1,056.00 1,017.00 1,150.00 1,291.00 1,348.18 1,403.40 1,459.28 1,515.82 1,573.01 1,630.83 1,689.27 1,748.32 1,807.96 1,868.19
% of Revenue 1.08% 1.17% 1.05% 1.17% 1.19% 1.18% 1.18% 1.17% 1.17% 1.16% 1.16% 1.15% 1.14% 1.14% 1.13%
Income Taxes Payable 220.00 190.00 288.00 248.00 287.00 310.56 333.68 337.76 345.24 352.22 358.70 366.71 376.16 387.00 399.17
% of Revenue .27% .21% .30% .25% .26% .27% .28% .27% .27% .26% .25% .25% .25% .24% .24%
Other Current Liabilities 2,147.00 2,215.00 2,538.00 2,769.00 2,888.00 2,999.04 3,137.09 3,277.99 3,421.76 3,568.42 3,717.97 3,870.45 4,025.85 4,184.20 4,345.52
% of Revenue 2.61% 2.45% 2.62% 2.81% 2.66% 2.63% 2.63% 2.63% 2.63% 2.63% 2.63% 2.63% 2.63% 2.63% 2.63%
Total Current Liabilities $7,482.00 $7,790.00 $8,327.00 $9,048.00 $9,518.00 $9,921.76 $10,341.34 $10,746.88 $11,160.74 $11,578.96 $12,001.44 $12,430.12 $12,864.85 $13,305.48 $13,751.86
% of Revenue 9.10% 8.62% 8.61% 9.20% 8.78% 8.72% 8.69% 8.64% 8.59% 8.55% 8.51% 8.46% 8.42% 8.38% 8.34%
UOIG 21
University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015
Appendix 5 – Income Statement
Appendix 6 – Balance Sheet
Balance Sheet
($ in millions) 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 2014A 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E 2023E 2024E
Assets
Current Assets
Cash and Cash Equivalents 825.00$ 188.00$ 238.00$ 401.00$ 268.00$ 261.74$ 229.52$ 565.82$ 411.10$ 804.33$ 1,298.12$ 1,647.48$ 2,055.70$ 3,076.43$ 3,974.57$
Deposits in Transit 666.00 786.00 955.00 958.00 988.00 1,058.51 1,084.75 1,133.47 1,183.19 1,233.90 1,285.61 1,338.34 1,392.07 1,446.83 1,502.61
Receivables 845.00 949.00 1,051.00 1,116.00 1,266.00 1,335.96 1,405.27 1,476.56 1,549.85 1,625.18 1,702.56 1,782.03 1,863.61 1,947.35 2,033.25
Inventory 4,966.00 5,114.00 5,146.00 5,651.00 5,688.00 6,059.04 6,339.23 6,625.31 6,917.31 7,215.27 7,519.21 7,829.18 8,145.20 8,467.32 8,795.55
Prepaid and Other Current Assets 319.00 288.00 569.00 704.00 701.00 735.60 769.46 804.02 839.28 875.25 911.94 949.34 987.45 1,026.29 1,104.96
Total Current Assets 7,621.00 7,325.00 7,959.00 8,830.00 8,911.00 9,450.85 9,828.23 10,605.18 10,900.73 11,753.93 12,717.44 13,546.35 14,444.04 15,964.22 17,410.95
Long-Term Assets
Property, Planet and Equipment, net 14,147.00 14,464.00 14,848.00 16,893.00 17,912.00 19,061.92 20,268.89 21,533.14 22,855.00 24,088.39 25,238.42 26,309.40 27,304.91 28,227.87 29,080.67
Intangibles, net 130.00 702.00 757.00 757.00 757.00 757.00 757.00 757.00 757.00 757.00 757.00 757.00 757.00
Goodwill 1,140.00 1,138.00 1,234.00 2,135.00 2,304.00 2,304.00 2,304.00 2,304.00 2,304.00 2,304.00 2,304.00 2,304.00 2,304.00 2,304.00 2,304.00
Total Long-TermAssets 15,884.00 16,151.00 16,675.00 20,451.00 21,645.00 22,809.92 24,031.89 25,311.14 26,648.00 27,896.39 29,061.42 30,147.40 31,157.91 32,095.87 32,963.67
Total Assets 23,505.00$ 23,476.00$ 24,634.00$ 29,281.00$ 30,556.00$ 32,260.77$ 33,860.12$ 35,916.33$ 37,548.73$ 39,650.32$ 41,778.86$ 43,693.76$ 45,601.94$ 48,060.09$ 50,374.61$
Liabilities
Current Liabilities
Current Portion of Long-TermDebt 588.00$ 1,315.00$ 2,734.00$ 1,657.00$ 1,885.00$ 500.00$ 300.00$ 1,050.00$ 500.00$ 500.00$ 750.00$ 1,200.00$ 500.00$ 500.00$ -$
Trade Accounts Payable 4,227 4,329 4,484 4,881 5,052 5,264 5,467 5,672 5,878 6,085 6,294 6,504 6,715 6,926 7,139
Accrued Salaries and Wages 888 1,056 1,017 1,150 1,291 1,348 1,403 1,459 1,516 1,573 1,631 1,689 1,748 1,808 1,868
Deferred Income Taxes 220 190 288 248 287 311 334 338 345 352 359 367 376 387 399
Other Current Liabilities 2,147 2,215 2,538 2,769 2,888 2,999 3,137 3,278 3,422 3,568 3,718 3,870 4,026 4,184 4,346
Total Current Liabilities 8,070 9,105 11,061 10,705 11,403 10,422 10,641 11,797 11,661 12,079 12,751 13,630 13,365 13,805 13,752
Long-Term Liabilities
Long-TermDebt 7,304 6,850 6,145 9,653 9,771 9,221 8,771 8,021 7,371 7,171 6,721 5,571 5,071 5,071 5,371
Deferred Income Taxes 750 647 796 1,381 1,209 1,263 1,322 1,381 1,441 1,503 1,566 1,630 1,696 1,763 1,831
Pension and Post-Retirement Benefits 946 1,393 1,291 901 1,463 1,411 1,480 1,551 1,623 1,697 1,773 1,850 1,930 2,011 2,094
Other Long-Term Liabilities 1,137 1,515 1,127 1,246 1,268 1,268 1,268 1,268 1,268 1,268 1,268 1,268 1,268 1,268 1,268
Total Long-TermLiabilities 10137.00 10405.00 9359.00 13181.00 13711.00 13163.34 12840.43 12220.41 11703.33 11639.20 11328.05 10319.90 9964.78 10112.71 10563.72
Total Liabilities 18,207.00$ 19,510.00$ 20,420.00$ 23,886.00$ 25,114.00$ 23,585.10$ 23,481.76$ 24,017.29$ 23,364.07$ 23,718.16$ 24,079.49$ 23,950.02$ 23,329.63$ 23,918.18$ 24,315.57$
Shareowner's Equity
Common Stock $959.00 $959.00 $959.00 $959.00 $959.00 $959.00 $959.00 $959.00 $959.00 $959.00 $959.00 $959.00 $959.00 $959.00 $959.00
Additional Paid-In Capital 3,394.00 3,427.00 3,451.00 3,549.00 3,707.00 5,493.61 5,743.48 5,787.59 6,575.90 6,808.37 7,034.96 7,505.64 8,420.35 8,629.07 8,831.74
Accumulated Earnings 7,675.00 7,727.00 9,034.00 10,517.00 11,555.00 13,002.05 14,454.88 15,931.44 17,428.76 18,943.79 20,484.41 22,058.10 23,671.96 25,332.84 27,047.30
Common Stock in Treasury (6,732) (8,132) (9,237) (9,641) (10,809) (10,809) (10,809) (10,809) (10,809) (10,809) (10,809) (10,809) (10,809) (10,809) (10,809)
Total Shareowner's Equity -- The Kroger Co. 5,296.00 3,981.00 4,207.00 5,384.00 5,412.00 8,645.66 10,348.36 11,869.04 14,154.66 15,902.16 17,669.38 19,713.73 22,242.31 24,111.90 26,029.04
Noncontrolling Interests 2.00 -15.00 7.00 11.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
Total Equity 5,298.00$ 3,966.00$ 4,214.00$ 5,395.00$ 5,442.00$ 8,675.66$ 10,378.36$ 11,899.04$ 14,184.66$ 15,932.16$ 17,699.38$ 19,743.73$ 22,272.31$ 24,141.90$ 26,059.04$
Total Liabilities and Equity 23,505.00$ 23,476.00$ 24,634.00$ 29,281.00$ 30,556.00$ 32,260.77$ 33,860.12$ 35,916.33$ 37,548.73$ 39,650.32$ 41,778.86$ 43,693.76$ 45,601.94$ 48,060.09$ 50,374.61$
Income Statement
($ in millions) 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 2014A 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E 2023E 2024E
Sales 82,049.00$ 90,269.00$ 96,619.00$ 98,375.00$ 108,465.00$ 113,818.52$ 119,057.50$ 124,404.90$ 129,861.27$ 135,427.16$ 141,103.15$ 146,889.79$ 152,787.66$ 158,797.35$ 164,919.44$
Operating Expenses:
Merchandise Costs 63,803.00 71,389.00 76,726.00 78,138.00 85,512.00 89,751.03 93,901.44 98,139.08 102,464.44 106,877.99 111,380.24 115,971.69 120,652.85 125,424.24 130,286.36
Operating, General, and Adminstrative 13,823.00 15,345.00 14,849.00 15,196.00 17,161.00 18,056.77 18,938.90 19,842.81 20,768.73 21,716.89 22,687.52 23,680.85 24,697.12 25,736.56 26,799.41
Rent 623.00 619.00 628.00 613.00 707.00 696.16 680.36 660.93 637.74 610.66 579.55 544.30 504.76 460.80 412.30
Depreciation and Amortization 1,600.00 1,638.00 1,652.00 1,703.00 1,948.00 2,065.51 2,198.11 2,337.29 2,483.07 2,635.50 2,777.73 2,910.34 3,033.84 3,148.64 3,255.07
Operating Profit 2,200.00 1,278.00 2,764.00 2,725.00 3,137.00 3,249.06 3,338.68 3,424.78 3,507.28 3,586.12 3,678.11 3,782.61 3,899.09 4,027.12 4,166.31
Non-Operating Expense:
Interest Expense 448.00 435.00 462.00 443.00 488.00 480.00 535.76 559.82 584.38 609.42 634.96 661.00 687.54 714.59 742.14
Earnings Before Interest and Taxes 1,752.00 843.00 2,302.00 2,282.00 2,649.00 2,769.06 2,802.93 2,864.96 2,922.91 2,976.70 3,043.14 3,121.60 3,211.55 3,312.53 3,424.17
Income TaxExpense 601.00 247.00 794.00 751.00 902.00 969.17 981.02 1,002.73 1,023.02 1,041.84 1,065.10 1,092.56 1,124.04 1,159.39 1,198.46
Net Earnings Including Non-Controlling Interest 1,151.00 596.00 1,508.00 1,531.00 1,747.00 1,799.89 1,821.90 1,862.22 1,899.89 1,934.85 1,978.04 2,029.04 2,087.51 2,153.15 2,225.71
Net Earnings (Loss) Attributable to Non-Controlling Interests 17.00 (6.00) 11.00 12.00 19.00 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60
Net Earnings Attributable to Kroger Co. 1,134.00$ 602.00$ 1,497.00$ 1,519.00$ 1,728.00$ 1,789.29$ 1,811.30$ 1,851.62$ 1,889.29$ 1,924.25$ 1,967.44$ 2,018.44$ 2,076.91$ 2,142.55$ 2,215.11$
UOIG 22
University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015
Appendix 7 – Statement of Cash Flows
Appendix 8 – Acquisitions
Statement of Cash Flows
($ in millions) 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 2014A 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E 2023E 2024E
Cash FlowFrom Operating Activities
Net Earnings including noncontrolling interests $1,133.00 $596.00 $1,508.00 $1,531.00 $1,747.00 $1,799.89 $1,821.90 $1,862.22 $1,899.89 $1,934.85 $1,978.04 $2,029.04 $2,087.51 $2,153.15 $2,225.71
Adjustments to Reconcile:
Depreciation and Amortization 1,600.00 1,638.00 1,652.00 1,703.00 1,948.00 2,065.51 2,198.11 2,337.29 2,483.07 2,635.50 2,777.73 2,910.34 3,033.84 3,148.64 3,255.07
Asset Impairment Charge 25.00 37.00 18.00 39.00 37.00 - - - - - - - - - -
LIFO Charge 57.00 216.00 55.00 52.00 147.00 - - - - - - - - - -
Stock-Based Employee Compensation 79.00 81.00 82.00 107.00 155.00 - - - - - - - - - -
Expense for Company-Sponsored Pension Plans 65.00 70.00 89.00 74.00 55.00 - - - - - - - - - -
Deferred Income Taxes 37.00 31.00 176.00 72.00 73.00 - - - - - - - - - -
Other 8.00 8.00 17.00 47.00 72.00 - - - - - - - - - -
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:
Store Deposits In-Transit (12.00) (120.00) (169.00) 25.00 (27.00) (70.51) (26.24) (48.72) (49.71) (50.71) (51.71) (52.72) (53.74) (54.76) (55.78)
Inventories (88.00) (361.00) (78.00) (131.00) (147.00) (371.04) (280.19) (286.08) (292.00) (297.96) (303.94) (309.97) (316.02) (322.11) (328.24)
Receivables (11.00) (63.00) (126.00) (8.00) (141.00) (69.96) (69.31) (71.29) (73.29) (75.32) (77.38) (79.47) (81.59) (83.73) (85.91)
Prepaid and Other Current Assets 290.00 52.00 (257.00) (49.00) 2.00 (34.60) (33.86) (34.56) (35.26) (35.97) (36.68) (37.40) (38.12) (38.84) (78.67)
Trade Accounts Payable 315.00 82.00 58.00 3.00 135.00 211.98 203.19 204.67 206.07 207.39 208.62 209.76 210.82 211.79 212.67
Accrued Expenses 71.00 216.00 76.00 77.00 197.00 57.18 55.22 55.88 56.54 57.19 57.82 58.44 59.05 59.64 60.23
Income Taxes Receivable/Payable 133.00 (106.00) 164.00 (47.00) (68.00) 23.56 23.13 4.08 7.47 6.98 6.48 8.01 9.45 10.84 12.17
Net Cash Providedby Operating Activities $3,366.00 $2,658.00 $2,833.00 $3,380.00 $4,163.00 $3,612.00 $3,891.94 $4,023.50 $4,202.78 $4,381.96 $4,558.97 $4,736.04 $4,911.21 $5,084.62 $5,217.26
Cash FlowFrom Investing Activities
Payments for Property and Equipment, Including Lease Buyouts ($1,919.00) ($1,898.00) ($2,062.00) ($2,330.00) ($2,831.00) ($3,010.55) ($3,190.78) ($3,377.61) ($3,571.18) ($3,625.12) ($3,673.78) ($3,716.92) ($3,754.33) ($3,785.77) ($3,811.01)
Payments for Acquisitions (7.00) (51.00) (122.00) (2,344.00) (252.00) (204.87) (214.30) (223.93) (233.75) (243.77) (253.99) (264.40) (275.02) (285.84) (296.85)
Net Cash Usedby Investing Activities ($1,961.00) ($1,908.00) ($2,183.00) ($4,771.00) ($3,060.00) ($3,215.42) ($3,405.08) ($3,601.54) ($3,804.94) ($3,868.89) ($3,927.76) ($3,981.32) ($4,029.35) ($4,071.60) ($4,107.86)
Cash FlowFrom Financing Activities
Proceeds fromIssuance of Long-TermDebt $381.00 $453.00 $863.00 $3,548.00 $576.00 $450.00 $350.00 $600.00 $900.00 $800.00 $800.00 $800.00 $1,200.00 $1,000.00 $800.00
Payments on Long-TermDebt (553.00) (547.00) (1,445.00) (1,060.00) (375.00) (500.00) (500.00) (300.00) (1,050.00) (500.00) (500.00) (750.00) (1,200.00) (500.00) (500.00)
Treasury Stock Purchases (545.00) (1,547.00) (1,261.00) (609.00) (1,283.00) - - - - - - - - - -
Dividends Paid (250.00) (257.00) (267.00) (319.00) (338.00) (352.84) (369.08) (385.66) (402.57) (419.82) (437.42) (455.36) (473.64) (492.27) (511.25)
Other -66.00 23.00 125.00 193.00 49.00 - - - - - - - - - -
Net Cash Provided(Used) by Financing Activities ($1,004.00) ($1,387.00) ($600.00) $1,554.00 ($1,236.00) ($402.84) ($519.08) ($85.66) ($552.57) ($119.83) ($137.42) ($405.36) ($473.64) $7.73 ($211.25)
Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents $401.00 ($637.00) $50.00 $163.00 ($133.00) ($6.26) ($32.22) $336.30 ($154.72) $393.24 $493.79 $349.36 $408.22 $1,020.74 $898.14
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year - 825.00 188.00 238.00 401.00 268.00 261.74 229.52 565.82 411.10 804.33 1298.12 1647.48 2055.70 3076.43
Cash Equivlanets at Endof Year $188.00 $238.00 $401.00 $268.00 $261.74 $229.52 $565.82 $411.10 $804.33 $1,298.12 $1,647.48 $2,055.70 $3,076.43 $3,974.57
Acquisitions
($ in millions) 2000A 2001A 2002A 2003A 2004A 2005A 2006A 2007A 2008A 2009A 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 2014A
Revenue 49,000.00 50,098.00 51,760.00 53,791.00 56,434.00 60,553.00 66,110.00 70,240.00 76,000.00 76,730.00 82,190.00 90,374.00 96,750.00 98,380.00 108,470.00
Total Assets 18,179.00 19,087.00 20,349.00 20,767.00 20,493.00 20,482.00 21,215.00 22,293.00 23,211.00 23,126.00 23,505.00 23,476.00 24,652.00 29,281.00 30,556.00
% Growth 1.87% 4.99% 6.61% 2.05% -1.32% -0.05% 3.58% 5.08% 4.12% -0.37% 1.64% -0.12% 5.01% 18.78% 4.35%
Payments for Acquisitions 67 103 126 87 25 - - 90 80 36 7 51 122 2,344 252
% of Revenue 0.14% 0.21% 0.24% 0.16% 0.04% 0.00% 0.00% 0.13% 0.11% 0.05% 0.01% 0.06% 0.13% 2.38% 0.23%
Goodwill, net 3,639.00 3,594.00 3,575.00 3,134.00 2,191.00 2,192.00 2,192.00 2,144.00 2,271.00 1,158.00 1,140.00 1,138.00 1,234.00 2,135.00 2,304.00
Change in Goodwill 58.00 (19.00) (441.00) (943.00) 1.00 - (48.00) 127.00 (1,113.00) (18.00) (2.00) 96.00 901.00 169.00
% of Revenue 7.43% 7.17% 6.91% 5.83% 3.88% 3.62% 3.32% 3.05% 2.99% 1.51% 1.39% 1.26% 1.28% 2.17% 2.12%
% of Assets 20.02% 18.83% 17.57% 15.09% 10.69% 10.70% 10.33% 9.62% 9.78% 5.01% 4.85% 4.85% 5.01% 7.29% 7.54%
Goodwill amortization 101 103 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
% of Revenue 0.21% 0.21% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
UOIG 23
University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015
Appendix 9 – Discounted Cash Flow Assumptions
DiscountedFree Cash FlowAssumptions Considerations
TaxRate 35.00% Terminal Growth Rate 3.00%
Risk Free Rate 1.93% Terminal Value 76,745 Avg. Industry Debt / Equity 12.40%
Beta 0.64 PVof Terminal Value 39,770 Avg. Industry TaxRate 34.98%
Market Risk Premium 6.45% Sumof PVFree Cash Flows 12,572 Current Reinvestment Rate 41.04%
% Equity 74.00% FirmValue 52,342 Reinvestment Rate in Year 2020E 47.92%
% Debt 26.00% Total Debt 11,656 Implied Return on Capital in Perpetuity 6.26%
Cost of Debt 4.19% Cash & Cash Equivalents 1,256 Terminal Value as a % of Total 76.0%
CAPM 6.05% Market Capitalization 40,686 Implied 2015E EBITDA Multiple 9.8x
WACC 5.19% Fully Diluted Shares 502 Implied Multiple in Year 2021E 5.9x
Terminal Risk Free Rate 2.70% Implied Price 80.98 Free Cash Flow Growth Rate in Year 2024E 7.00%
Terminal CAPM 6.82% Current Price 70.55
Terminal WACC 5.76% Undervalued 14.79%
Source Implied Price Weighting
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis $80.98 75%
Comparable Analysis 90.93 25%
Weighted Implied Price $83.47
Current Price $70.55
Undervalued 18.31%
UOIG 24
University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015
Appendix 10 – Sensitivity Tables
ImpliedPrice Undervalued/(Overvalued)
Terminal Growth Rate Terminal Growth Rate
81 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% 0 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0%
0.61 62.40 72.37 86.12 106.32 138.88 0.61 (11.56%) 2.57% 22.07% 50.70% 96.85%
0.63 59.99 69.32 82.06 100.52 129.64 0.63 (14.97%) (1.75%) 16.31% 42.47% 83.75%
0.65 57.71 66.45 78.27 95.19 121.37 0.65 (18.20%) (5.82%) 10.95% 34.93% 72.03%
0.67 55.54 63.74 74.74 90.29 113.93 0.67 (21.28%) (9.66%) 5.94% 27.97% 61.48%
0.69 53.48 61.18 71.43 85.76 107.19 0.69 (24.20%) (13.29%) 1.25% 21.55% 51.93%
ImpliedPrice Undervalued/(Overvalued)
Terminal Growth Rate Terminal Growth Rate
81 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% 0 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0%
4.82% 78.46 95.44 121.74 167.98 270.63 4.82% 11.21% 35.27% 72.56% 138.10% 283.60%
5.32% 66.92 78.84 95.89 122.32 168.78 5.32% (5.15%) 11.75% 35.92% 73.39% 139.24%
5.82% 58.40 67.24 79.21 96.35 122.91 5.82% (17.23%) (4.70%) 12.28% 36.57% 74.21%
6.32% 51.85 58.67 67.56 79.59 96.81 6.32% (26.51%) (16.83%) (4.24%) 12.81% 37.22%
6.82% 46.66 52.09 58.95 67.87 79.96 6.82% (33.86%) (26.16%) (16.44%) (3.79%) 13.34%
ImpliedPrice Undervalued/(Overvalued)
Terminal Growth Rate Terminal Growth Rate
81 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% 0 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0%
5.45% 72.45 85.39 103.99 133.02 184.67 5.45% 2.69% 21.03% 47.40% 88.55% 161.75%
5.95% 65.45 76.28 91.40 114.01 151.49 5.95% (7.23%) 8.12% 29.55% 61.60% 114.72%
6.45% 59.35 68.50 80.98 98.99 127.25 6.45% (15.88%) (2.90%) 14.79% 40.31% 80.37%
6.95% 53.97 61.79 72.22 86.83 108.78 6.95% (23.50%) (12.42%) 2.37% 23.08% 54.19%
7.45% 49.21 55.94 64.75 76.79 94.24 7.45% (30.25%) (20.71%) (8.22%) 8.85% 33.57%
AdjustedBeta
AdjustedBeta
TerminalWACC
TerminalWACC
MarketRisk
Premium
MarketRisk
Premium
UOIG 25
University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015
Appendix 10 – Sensitivity Tables Continued
ImpliedPrice Undervalued/(Overvalued)
Terminal Growth Rate Terminal Growth Rate
81 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% 0 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0%
25% 56.79 65.29 76.76 93.09 118.16 25% (19.51%) (7.45%) 8.81% 31.94% 67.48%
30% 58.05 66.87 78.83 95.97 122.57 30% (17.72%) (5.21%) 11.74% 36.03% 73.73%
35% 59.35 68.50 80.98 98.99 127.25 35% (15.88%) (2.90%) 14.79% 40.31% 80.37%
40% 60.68 70.19 83.22 102.16 132.24 40% (13.99%) (.51%) 17.96% 44.81% 87.44%
45% 62.06 71.94 85.55 105.50 137.55 45% (12.03%) 1.97% 21.26% 49.53% 94.97%
ImpliedPrice Undervalued/(Overvalued)
Terminal Growth Rate Terminal Growth Rate
81 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% 0 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0%
1.70% 60.87 70.22 82.97 101.36 130.22 1.70% (13.72%) (.46%) 17.60% 43.67% 84.58%
1.80% 60.20 69.47 82.10 100.32 128.92 1.80% (14.67%) (1.53%) 16.37% 42.20% 82.74%
1.90% 59.54 68.73 81.24 99.30 127.63 1.90% (15.60%) (2.59%) 15.15% 40.75% 80.91%
2.00% 58.89 67.99 80.39 98.28 126.36 2.00% (16.53%) (3.63%) 13.94% 39.31% 79.11%
2.10% 58.24 67.26 79.54 97.27 125.10 2.10% (17.45%) (4.67%) 12.75% 37.88% 77.32%
ImpliedPrice Undervalued/(Overvalued)
Terminal Growth Rate Terminal Growth Rate
81 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% 0 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0%
482 61.86 71.40 84.41 103.18 132.64 482 (12.32%) 1.21% 19.65% 46.25% 88.01%
492 60.60 69.95 82.69 101.08 129.94 492 (14.10%) (.85%) 17.21% 43.28% 84.19%
502 59.39 68.56 81.05 99.07 127.35 502 (15.81%) (2.82%) 14.88% 40.43% 80.52%
512 58.23 67.22 79.46 97.14 124.87 512 (17.46%) (4.72%) 12.64% 37.68% 76.99%
522 57.12 65.93 77.94 95.27 122.47 522 (19.04%) (6.55%) 10.48% 35.05% 73.60%
RiskFreeRate
RiskFreeRate
Outstanding
Shares
Outstanding
Shares
TaxRate
TaxRate
UOIG 26
University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015
Appendix 11 - Sources
FactSet
Federal Reserve Economic Data
Financial Visualizations Website
IBIS World
Kroger 10-K
Kroger 2013 Factbook
Kroger Quarterly Reports
Kroger Q1 2014 Earnings Presentation
Kroger Q2 2014 Earnings Presentation
Kroger Q3 2014 Earnings Presentation
Kroger Q4 2014 Earnings Presentation
Kroger Website
Morningstar
United States Census Bureau
Wall Street Journal
Yahoo Finance

More Related Content

What's hot

Kinyatti maina strategic_management_case (1)
Kinyatti maina strategic_management_case (1)Kinyatti maina strategic_management_case (1)
Kinyatti maina strategic_management_case (1)Tianyu Yuan
 
SGA Talent's 2019 Retail Study
SGA Talent's 2019 Retail StudySGA Talent's 2019 Retail Study
SGA Talent's 2019 Retail StudySGA Talent
 
Whole foods market inc
Whole foods market incWhole foods market inc
Whole foods market inchowardaa
 
Interpreting product launch sales data for NPDs
Interpreting product launch sales data for NPDs Interpreting product launch sales data for NPDs
Interpreting product launch sales data for NPDs IRI, INTL
 
Capitalizing on Opportunities in Fresh Prepared Foods
Capitalizing on Opportunities in Fresh Prepared FoodsCapitalizing on Opportunities in Fresh Prepared Foods
Capitalizing on Opportunities in Fresh Prepared FoodsL.E.K. Consulting
 
TPL Case Study 2
TPL Case Study 2TPL Case Study 2
TPL Case Study 2IT-NEXT
 
Macy's Acquires Nordstrom | Mergers & Acquisitions Pitch
Macy's Acquires Nordstrom | Mergers & Acquisitions PitchMacy's Acquires Nordstrom | Mergers & Acquisitions Pitch
Macy's Acquires Nordstrom | Mergers & Acquisitions PitchAntony Zaki
 
Srategic management
Srategic managementSrategic management
Srategic managementanna41192
 
Amcon Distributing Final
Amcon Distributing FinalAmcon Distributing Final
Amcon Distributing Finallesterlie88
 
2016 UK state of the nation update by IRI
2016 UK state of the nation update by IRI 2016 UK state of the nation update by IRI
2016 UK state of the nation update by IRI IRI, INTL
 
Direct and Global Sourcing
Direct and Global SourcingDirect and Global Sourcing
Direct and Global SourcingGary Kawahara
 
Whole Foods Market (WFM) Internal and External Marketing Analysis | Strategic...
Whole Foods Market (WFM) Internal and External Marketing Analysis | Strategic...Whole Foods Market (WFM) Internal and External Marketing Analysis | Strategic...
Whole Foods Market (WFM) Internal and External Marketing Analysis | Strategic...Jack Sherrer
 
IRI UK FMCG snapshot
IRI UK FMCG snapshotIRI UK FMCG snapshot
IRI UK FMCG snapshotIRI, INTL
 
Apparel Quarterly Update – Summer 2018
Apparel Quarterly Update – Summer 2018Apparel Quarterly Update – Summer 2018
Apparel Quarterly Update – Summer 2018Duff & Phelps
 
5 force model
5 force model5 force model
5 force modelJoel Pais
 
Vips post 4 q12 presentation
Vips post 4 q12  presentationVips post 4 q12  presentation
Vips post 4 q12 presentationdgiplcorponline
 
Retail Asia 2013 Analysis & Top 40
Retail Asia 2013 Analysis & Top 40Retail Asia 2013 Analysis & Top 40
Retail Asia 2013 Analysis & Top 40Melih ÖZCANLI
 

What's hot (20)

Kinyatti maina strategic_management_case (1)
Kinyatti maina strategic_management_case (1)Kinyatti maina strategic_management_case (1)
Kinyatti maina strategic_management_case (1)
 
SGA Talent's 2019 Retail Study
SGA Talent's 2019 Retail StudySGA Talent's 2019 Retail Study
SGA Talent's 2019 Retail Study
 
Whole foods market inc
Whole foods market incWhole foods market inc
Whole foods market inc
 
Interpreting product launch sales data for NPDs
Interpreting product launch sales data for NPDs Interpreting product launch sales data for NPDs
Interpreting product launch sales data for NPDs
 
Capitalizing on Opportunities in Fresh Prepared Foods
Capitalizing on Opportunities in Fresh Prepared FoodsCapitalizing on Opportunities in Fresh Prepared Foods
Capitalizing on Opportunities in Fresh Prepared Foods
 
TPL Case Study 2
TPL Case Study 2TPL Case Study 2
TPL Case Study 2
 
Macy's Acquires Nordstrom | Mergers & Acquisitions Pitch
Macy's Acquires Nordstrom | Mergers & Acquisitions PitchMacy's Acquires Nordstrom | Mergers & Acquisitions Pitch
Macy's Acquires Nordstrom | Mergers & Acquisitions Pitch
 
Srategic management
Srategic managementSrategic management
Srategic management
 
Amcon Distributing Final
Amcon Distributing FinalAmcon Distributing Final
Amcon Distributing Final
 
Walmart SWOT Analysis 2018
Walmart SWOT Analysis 2018Walmart SWOT Analysis 2018
Walmart SWOT Analysis 2018
 
Walmart swot analysis 2021
Walmart swot analysis 2021Walmart swot analysis 2021
Walmart swot analysis 2021
 
2016 UK state of the nation update by IRI
2016 UK state of the nation update by IRI 2016 UK state of the nation update by IRI
2016 UK state of the nation update by IRI
 
Direct and Global Sourcing
Direct and Global SourcingDirect and Global Sourcing
Direct and Global Sourcing
 
Whole Foods Market (WFM) Internal and External Marketing Analysis | Strategic...
Whole Foods Market (WFM) Internal and External Marketing Analysis | Strategic...Whole Foods Market (WFM) Internal and External Marketing Analysis | Strategic...
Whole Foods Market (WFM) Internal and External Marketing Analysis | Strategic...
 
IRI UK FMCG snapshot
IRI UK FMCG snapshotIRI UK FMCG snapshot
IRI UK FMCG snapshot
 
Apparel Quarterly Update – Summer 2018
Apparel Quarterly Update – Summer 2018Apparel Quarterly Update – Summer 2018
Apparel Quarterly Update – Summer 2018
 
5 force model
5 force model5 force model
5 force model
 
Vips post 4 q12 presentation
Vips post 4 q12  presentationVips post 4 q12  presentation
Vips post 4 q12 presentation
 
Retail Asia 2013 Analysis & Top 40
Retail Asia 2013 Analysis & Top 40Retail Asia 2013 Analysis & Top 40
Retail Asia 2013 Analysis & Top 40
 
Retail Mix | Retail Pulse
Retail Mix | Retail PulseRetail Mix | Retail Pulse
Retail Mix | Retail Pulse
 

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (16)

RENT Report
RENT ReportRENT Report
RENT Report
 
Deepthi IM & KM
Deepthi IM & KMDeepthi IM & KM
Deepthi IM & KM
 
Ejercicio de-diagnóstico-caso-15-1
Ejercicio de-diagnóstico-caso-15-1Ejercicio de-diagnóstico-caso-15-1
Ejercicio de-diagnóstico-caso-15-1
 
walton CV 2015 brief
walton CV 2015 briefwalton CV 2015 brief
walton CV 2015 brief
 
wamu new cv
wamu new cvwamu new cv
wamu new cv
 
Medical Instrument and Supply Manufacturing Industry Report
Medical Instrument and Supply Manufacturing Industry ReportMedical Instrument and Supply Manufacturing Industry Report
Medical Instrument and Supply Manufacturing Industry Report
 
Trabajo práctico
Trabajo prácticoTrabajo práctico
Trabajo práctico
 
introduccion a la psicologia cognitiva
introduccion a la psicologia cognitivaintroduccion a la psicologia cognitiva
introduccion a la psicologia cognitiva
 
Classical Music Magazine - Classical Clubnights
Classical Music Magazine - Classical ClubnightsClassical Music Magazine - Classical Clubnights
Classical Music Magazine - Classical Clubnights
 
Classical Music - Panufnik
Classical Music - PanufnikClassical Music - Panufnik
Classical Music - Panufnik
 
Muso - Heath Quartet
Muso - Heath QuartetMuso - Heath Quartet
Muso - Heath Quartet
 
Final PAYX Report
Final PAYX ReportFinal PAYX Report
Final PAYX Report
 
AGX-Final-Report
AGX-Final-ReportAGX-Final-Report
AGX-Final-Report
 
SSNI-Report-Final
SSNI-Report-FinalSSNI-Report-Final
SSNI-Report-Final
 
Becton-Dickinson
Becton-DickinsonBecton-Dickinson
Becton-Dickinson
 
DHC 8 Ice Shields
DHC 8 Ice ShieldsDHC 8 Ice Shields
DHC 8 Ice Shields
 

Similar to Final KR Report

Operation strategy kroger and wholefoods
Operation strategy kroger and wholefoodsOperation strategy kroger and wholefoods
Operation strategy kroger and wholefoodsChannels-Brief
 
Wassim Zhani Kroger.pdf
Wassim Zhani Kroger.pdfWassim Zhani Kroger.pdf
Wassim Zhani Kroger.pdfWassim Zhani
 
IMC 613 Brand Equity Audit for Ingles Markets
IMC 613 Brand Equity Audit for Ingles MarketsIMC 613 Brand Equity Audit for Ingles Markets
IMC 613 Brand Equity Audit for Ingles MarketsStephanie Marchant
 
Food Retail Industry Insights - 2016
Food Retail Industry Insights - 2016Food Retail Industry Insights - 2016
Food Retail Industry Insights - 2016Duff & Phelps
 
Whole Foods Analysis Final Report v2
Whole Foods Analysis Final Report v2Whole Foods Analysis Final Report v2
Whole Foods Analysis Final Report v2Teddy Freedman
 
IRI Review of C Stores 2013
IRI Review of C Stores 2013IRI Review of C Stores 2013
IRI Review of C Stores 2013Neil Kimberley
 
Promar Digest February 2015
Promar Digest February 2015Promar Digest February 2015
Promar Digest February 2015John Giles
 
Promar digest Feb 2015
Promar digest Feb 2015Promar digest Feb 2015
Promar digest Feb 2015Thomas Gill
 
Amazon Fresh - Mock Marketing Plan
Amazon Fresh - Mock Marketing PlanAmazon Fresh - Mock Marketing Plan
Amazon Fresh - Mock Marketing PlanHelena Lavieri
 
An analysis of_consumers_brand_preference_on_national_vs_store_management
An analysis of_consumers_brand_preference_on_national_vs_store_managementAn analysis of_consumers_brand_preference_on_national_vs_store_management
An analysis of_consumers_brand_preference_on_national_vs_store_managementSumit Kumar Gangwani
 
Red Team Capstone Week 2Brianna Baldwin, Brittn.docx
Red Team Capstone Week 2Brianna Baldwin, Brittn.docxRed Team Capstone Week 2Brianna Baldwin, Brittn.docx
Red Team Capstone Week 2Brianna Baldwin, Brittn.docxdanas19
 

Similar to Final KR Report (14)

Operation strategy kroger and wholefoods
Operation strategy kroger and wholefoodsOperation strategy kroger and wholefoods
Operation strategy kroger and wholefoods
 
Wassim Zhani Kroger.pdf
Wassim Zhani Kroger.pdfWassim Zhani Kroger.pdf
Wassim Zhani Kroger.pdf
 
IMC 613 Brand Equity Audit for Ingles Markets
IMC 613 Brand Equity Audit for Ingles MarketsIMC 613 Brand Equity Audit for Ingles Markets
IMC 613 Brand Equity Audit for Ingles Markets
 
Whole Foods
Whole FoodsWhole Foods
Whole Foods
 
Food Retail Industry Insights - 2016
Food Retail Industry Insights - 2016Food Retail Industry Insights - 2016
Food Retail Industry Insights - 2016
 
Whole Foods Analysis Final Report v2
Whole Foods Analysis Final Report v2Whole Foods Analysis Final Report v2
Whole Foods Analysis Final Report v2
 
Grocery Tracker 2019
Grocery Tracker 2019Grocery Tracker 2019
Grocery Tracker 2019
 
Trader Joe's HBS Case Analysis 12.2016
Trader Joe's HBS Case Analysis 12.2016Trader Joe's HBS Case Analysis 12.2016
Trader Joe's HBS Case Analysis 12.2016
 
IRI Review of C Stores 2013
IRI Review of C Stores 2013IRI Review of C Stores 2013
IRI Review of C Stores 2013
 
Promar Digest February 2015
Promar Digest February 2015Promar Digest February 2015
Promar Digest February 2015
 
Promar digest Feb 2015
Promar digest Feb 2015Promar digest Feb 2015
Promar digest Feb 2015
 
Amazon Fresh - Mock Marketing Plan
Amazon Fresh - Mock Marketing PlanAmazon Fresh - Mock Marketing Plan
Amazon Fresh - Mock Marketing Plan
 
An analysis of_consumers_brand_preference_on_national_vs_store_management
An analysis of_consumers_brand_preference_on_national_vs_store_managementAn analysis of_consumers_brand_preference_on_national_vs_store_management
An analysis of_consumers_brand_preference_on_national_vs_store_management
 
Red Team Capstone Week 2Brianna Baldwin, Brittn.docx
Red Team Capstone Week 2Brianna Baldwin, Brittn.docxRed Team Capstone Week 2Brianna Baldwin, Brittn.docx
Red Team Capstone Week 2Brianna Baldwin, Brittn.docx
 

Final KR Report

  • 1. 1 University of Oregon Investment Group Covering Analysts: Gregg Anderson and Charles Pontrelli May 1, 2015 Consumer Goods Investment Thesis The recent acquisition of Harris Teeter and Vitacost.com provides Kroger the opportunity to further penetrate and capitalize on the fast-growing online, southeast and Mid-Atlantic markets. Successful penetration, via Harris Teeters’ numerous locations and established brand, will result in additional market share and diversification for Kroger’s revenue streams. Kroger’s wide variety of stores and brands, spanning across 36 states, provides various price points and value for nearly all consumers. This unique diversity allows Kroger to adapt to shifting consumer trends and maintain stable revenue streams. Considering a proven management team, geographic diversification, clear growth strategies, and little downside risk, Kroger offers investors a value play. The Kroger Company Ticker: KR Current Price: $70.55 Recommendation: Outperform Price Target: $83.47 Five-Year Stock Chart 0 5000000 10000000 15000000 20000000 25000000 30000000 35000000 40000000 45000000 $0.00 $10.00 $20.00 $30.00 $40.00 $50.00 $60.00 $70.00 $80.00 $90.00 Apr-10 Oct-10 Apr-11 Oct-11 Apr-12 Oct-12 Apr-13 Oct-13 Apr-14 Oct-14 Volume Adj Close 50-Day Avg 200-Day Avg Key Statistics 52 Week Price Range $44.72 - $77.74 50-Day Moving Average $75.33 Estimated Beta 0.63 Dividend Yield 1.00% Market Capitalization (mm) $35,741.25 3-Year Revenue CAGR 3.88% Trading Statistics Diluted Shares Outstanding (mm) 502.41 Average Volume (3-Month) (mm) 4.32 Institutional Ownership 83.50% Insider Ownership 6.11% EBITDA Growth (2015E) 4.63% Margins and Ratios Gross Margin (2015E) 21.15% EBITDA Margin (2015E) 4.67% Net Margin (2015E) 1.58% Debt to Enterprise Value 0.31
  • 2. UOIG 2 University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015 Business Overview The Kroger Company (Kroger) was founded in 1883 by Bernard Kroger in Cincinnati Ohio as a grocery store, and was incorporated in 1902. They currently trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker KR. Their headquarters are in Cincinnati, Ohio. Kroger is now the largest supermarket chain in America, the second-largest general retail chain behind Walmart, and the fifth largest retailer in the world. They operate domestically in 36 states, with over 3500 stores. Kroger also employs approximately 400,000 full- and part- time employees, with the majority of these employees being covered by collective bargaining agreements. There are approximately 300 bargaining agreements that can range from three to five years. Kroger’s stores consist of supermarkets, convenience stores, and jewelry stores. In addition, their supermarkets operate under a few different formats: combination food and drug stores, multi-department stores, marketplace stores, and price impact warehouses. The majority of the supermarkets function under the combo store format, which offer natural food and organic sections, pharmacies, general merchandise, pet centers, and seafood and meat. Their multi-department stores offer everything the combo stores offer, as well as apparel, home furnishings, outdoor living, automotive products, electronics, toys, and fine jewelry. Marketplace stores are a little smaller than multi- department stores, but have similar offerings, and the price impact warehouses offer a “no frills, low cost” warehouse format, similar to that of Costco. Kroger operates a considerable amount of brands to meet every customer’s needs. Their supermarkets stock over 13,000 private label items, on average. Kroger’s corporate brand products are essential to their merchandising strategy, and are separated into three tiers: premium, quality, and value. Private Selection brand is designed to compete with other “gourmet” or “upscale” brands. Kroger’s banner brands, such as Kroger, Ralph’s, Fred Meyer, King Scoopers, and newly acquired Harris Teeter represent the majority of their private label items, and are included under the quality tier. Before banner brand products are carried in their stores, Kroger does extensive product quality testing to make sure that the customers will be extremely satisfied, and Kroger has a satisfaction guarantee. They also offer brands such as P$$T, Check This Out…, and Heritage Farm, which fall under the value tier. These brands provide good quality at a very low price. Kroger has also grown other brands extensively. For example, their new brands Simple Truth and Simple Truth Organic provide food free of artificial preservatives and ingredients, and Simple Truth Organic has been certified organic by the USDA. In 2013, Kroger announced they would acquire Harris Teeter, super market chain based in the southeast portion of the United States. They acquired Harris Teeter for $2.5 billion and assumed $100 million of Harris Teeter’s debt. This acquisition gave Kroger access to Harris Teeter’s click and collect program, which allows customers to order their groceries online and then pick them up in a nearby store. Also, Kroger announced on March 3, 2015 that they will be expanding their operations to Hawaii, which currently has Safeway, Wal-Mart, Costco, Honolulu-based Foodland and Times, as well as Department of Defense-owned DeCA Commissaries. Kroger is still deciding on whether they will use the Kroger name or another banner brand, such as Fred Meyer or QFC. Figure 1: Kroger Employee Growth Source: Kroger 10-K 0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 350000 400000 450000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 TotalEmployees Figure 2: Kroger Store Breakdown Source: Kroger 10-K 70% 21% 9% Supermarkets and Multi-Department Stores Convenience Stores Jewelry Stores Figure 3: Kroger Identical Store Sales Source: Kroger 10-K 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 2000A 2002A 2004A 2006A 2008A 2010A 2012A 2014A Millions($)
  • 3. UOIG 3 University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015 Industry Overview The Kroger Company operates in the Consumer Goods sector and the Supermarkets and Grocery Stores industry. Businesses in this industry sell general food products, including canned and frozen foods, fresh produce, fresh and prepared meats, poultry, and seafood, and dairy products. Many companies in this industry also provide ancillary household products and appliances. There are approximately 42,036 businesses in this industry. While this is not a relatively large industry, the competition level is very high. Kroger holds the largest market share in this industry with approximately 15.4%. Safeway follows behind with a 6.6% market share, then Publix Super Markets Inc. at 5.5%, followed by the rest of the industry. The majority of these companies operate domestically. Competition is very high in this industry due to supermarkets and grocery stores competing fiercely for sales by offering discounts and promotions. Companies like Kroger depend on their size and purchasing power to provide the lowest prices. Goods within the industry are relatively homogeneous, so businesses must compete on price. However, there has been a growing trend with consumers of buying an increasing amount of natural and organic goods. This allows companies to charge a higher price on their goods and boost revenues. However, as organic and natural foods become more common with the consumers, stores have to compete on price of those goods, as well. Even though competition is relatively stiff in the industry, the market concentration is very low. Reports estimate that over a third of the businesses operating in this industry employ five or less employees. On top of that, the top four companies account for approximately 30% of revenue in 2014. Most of the players in the industry are small- to medium-sized companies, and operate in local or regional markets. Even though this industry is segmented, concentration has increased over the last few years with many mergers and acquisitions by the industry leaders. The Supermarkets and Grocery Stores industry has relatively low capital intensity. It is estimated that for every dollar spent on labor in the industry, 9 cents will be spent on capital. Capital expenditures usually go towards the purchase of buildings, as well as store assets, such as cash registers, shelving, refrigerators, etc. Still, capital expenditures have been increasing due to the expansion into online shopping, the addition of self-checkout systems, and computerized point-of-sale systems. This industry demands a high amount of labor because of the amount of work it takes to stock shelves, organize inventories, and provide customer service. However, the amount of workers in the industry has declined the past 5 years with the implementation of self- checkout systems. Still, wages have increased because of the general economic trend of increasing minimum wage standards. While technology change has traditionally been low in this industry, there have been many developments in the recent future that have changed the industry. For example, the aforementioned self-checkout systems. Additionally, many grocery store and supermarket chains are offering online ordering and smartphone ordering, where customers can order from their computer or phone and then have their purchases delivered to them or they can pick them up at a nearby store. These same stores also offer online coupons and promotions so that consumers can have access to their deals wherever they go. One of the Figure 4: Industry Market Share Source: IBIS World Kroger 15.40% Safeway, Inc. 6.60% Publix Super Markets, Inc. 5.50% Other 72.50% Life Cycle Stage Mature Revenue Volatility Low Capital Intensity Low Industry Assistance Low Concentration Level Low Regulation Level Medium Technology Change Medium Barriers to Entry Medium Industry Globalization Low Competition Level High Figure 5: Industry Structure Source: IBIS World 6.4% 7.3% 4.0% 4.6% 9.1% 9.7% 74.0% 75.4% 0.9% 0.9% 2.0% 0.6%3.5% 1.5% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Sector Industry Other Rent & Utilities Wages Purchases Depreciation Marketing Profit Figure 6: Sector vs. Industry Costs Source: IBIS World
  • 4. UOIG 4 University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015 latest technological advancements in the industry is the Pay By Touch system. Consumer can set up a profile or “e-wallet” with the store that stores their bank account, reward card, and/or credit card information. When they shop at the store, the consumer only needs to provide their fingerprint and a passcode in order to pay for their groceries. This provides for an easier and more secure way of shopping. The Supermarket and Grocery Stores utilizes a few metrics to measure company performance, the two primary metrics being sales per square foot and same store sales. Kroger has had positive same store sales growth for 45 straight quarters, and is expected to continue this trend in the future. They also have relatively high sales per square foot. It is expected that sales per square foot will continue to increase due to Kroger focusing on operational efficiency and increasing their offerings of natural and organic goods. This will be discussed later in the report with the revenue model. Macro factors US Population Total US Population is one macroeconomic factor that affects total sales. Because supermarkets and grocery stores offer primarily necessities like food, they have relatively stable revenue streams. Still, the more people that shop at their store, the greater amount of revenue they will have. Additionally, Kroger is trying to raise their sales per square foot by bringing in more customers. With a higher total US Population, Kroger can capitalize on more customers. Total US Population was factored into the revenue regression, and was projected into 2021 at approximately a .8% growth rate year over year. It is expected that the US Population will continue to grow at a steady growth rate such as this one. Producer Price Index Another significant macroeconomic factor that drives the industry is the Producer Price Index, or PPI. Because grocery stores and supermarkets compete fiercely on prices to attract customers, they are highly affected by how much it costs to produce their goods. The Producer Price Index measures relative production costs for businesses and the items the produce. Therefore, the lower the PPI, the better companies can compete in the industry. If the PPI rises, it becomes more difficult for operators in the industries to provide competitive prices. However, for larger companies such as Kroger and Safeway, they can keep their costs low through economies of scale. It is also moderately easy to pass on the additional costs to the consumer. Per Capita Disposable Income Per Capita Disposable Income refers to the average amount of money each person in the United States has to spend on goods and services, after taxes, savings, and some non-tax payments are factored in. Per Capita Disposable Income has a positive correlation with normal goods. While it has a moderate effect on grocery store and supermarket sales, it has increasingly become a larger factor, due to businesses providing more natural and organic foods, which cost more. Consumers are willing to spend more on these premium products because of their growing disposable income. Kroger has been capitalizing on this growth with their Simple Truth and Simple Truth Organic products. Competition Competition in the Supermarket and Grocery Store industry is relatively high due to large players in the space, as well as the fierce price competition and Figure 7: Industry Segmentation Source: IBIS World 19.10% 12.10% 11.40% 11.30% 8.40% 3.10% 2.20% 32.40% Beverages Dairy Products Frozen Foods Non-Food Items Fresh and Frozen Meat Drugs and Health Products Fruit and Vegetables Other Food Items 250000 270000 290000 310000 330000 350000 370000 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018 2021 2024 TotalUSPopulation(thousands) Figure 8: Total US Population Source: FRED and UOIG Spreads 50 100 150 200 250 300 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018 2021 2024 ProducerPriceIndexLevel Figure 9: Producer Price Index Source: FRED and UOIG Spreads
  • 5. UOIG 5 University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015 aggressive expansion. Additionally, the introduction of online markets has increased competition as businesses are now able to reach a wider customer base. While most of the companies in this industry operate in small local and regional markets, there are a few large players that dominate the market. It is estimated that four companies represented approximately 30% of revenue in 2014. Kroger leads these companies, with an estimated 15% market share. Its largest competitors in the industry are Safeway and Publix, while Costco and Wal-Mart are its largest competitors outside of the industry. Kroger has been able to maintain its position through its large product offering, its commitment to its customers, and its strategic acquisitions, which will be discussed later. All of the major players in the industry have put a large focus on providing natural and organic foods for their customers. Now that these natural and organic foods are becoming more widespread, companies are going to have to compete on price on these products as well. Traditionally, companies were able to charge premiums for these foods, but they will be expected to compete on price in the near future. Kroger owns a very large amount of bakeries, dairy farms, and other farms that act as local manufacturers and distributors for the surrounding stores. By owning many of these local manufacturers, they are able to provide a greater amount of natural and organic foods, without having to worry about the food products spoiling. Going into the future, success in the industry will be determined by the companies that can achieve economies of scale, capture greater market share than its competitors, and provide a substantial amount of products to meet consumer needs. Whichever company that is able to offer the lowest price for comparable goods will attract the most customers, and will be able to enjoy the greatest market share. Strategic Positioning Market Leader Kroger is the leader in its industry, and continues to grow. Market share is a very important part of their long-term strategy, and it is the best way to reflect the success of its products with customers. In addition to increasing revenue through market share, a greater market share allows Kroger to spread its fixed costs out over a wider revenue base. To measure its market share, Kroger uses Nielsen POS+ data. From this data, it is estimated that Kroger’s market share in the markets in which it operates increased by 60 basis points in 2014. This is compared to an estimated 50 basis points increase in 2013. Wal-Mart is one of Kroger’s top two competitors in 15 of the 20 markets that are covered in the Nielson Report. According to Nielsen, Kroger’s market share increased in all 15 of these markets. Overall, their market share increased in 18 of the markets and decreased slightly in two of the markets. Kroger plans on growing their market share in these markets going into the future through the establishment of new stores, and possible acquisitions. Merchandising and Manufacturing Kroger is has one of the largest private label manufacturing networks in the country. Kroger owns 37 manufacturing plants, which consists of 17 dairies, nine deli or bakery plants, five grocery product plants, two beverage plants, two meat plants and two cheese plants. These plants produce 40% of the food 100 150 200 250 300 350 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018 2021 2024 ConsumerPriceIndexLevel Figure 10: Consumer Price Index Source: FRED and UOIG Spreads Figure 11: Kroger Total Square Footage Source: Kroger 10-K and UOIG Spreads 120.0 130.0 140.0 150.0 160.0 170.0 180.0 190.0 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018 2021 2024 MillionsofSquareFeet Figure 12: Merchandising Costs Source: Kroger 10-K and UOIG Spreads 0.00 20000.00 40000.00 60000.00 80000.00 100000.00 120000.00 140000.00 2010A 2012A 2014A 2016E 2018E 2020E 2022E 2024E Millions($)
  • 6. UOIG 6 University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015 products sold by Kroger and its subsidiaries. The other 60% are produced by outside manufacturers that follow strict guidelines. Kroger also recently opened a new, state of the art dairy processing plant in Denver. It is the first dairy in the United States to use robotic technology that enables Kroger to pack cases and pick and palletize orders entirely by automation. It produces fresh and organic milk, and will primarily distribute to Kroger stores in the central United States Because they own so many of the plants that manufacture their goods, Kroger is able to lower their manufacturing prices considerably. It also allows them to ensure that their customers get the highest quality products. These manufacturing plants are spread out all across the United States. This allows Kroger to maintain the freshness of their products and reduce transportation costs. Acquisitions On January 28, 2014, Kroger closed their merger with Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc. (“Harris Teeter”) by buying 100% of Harris Teeter stock for approximately $2.4 billion. This merger allows Kroger to establish itself in the southeastern and mid-Atlantic markets, as well as Washington, D.C. Both the southeastern and mid-Atlantic states, on average, have higher population growth than the United States as a whole, which Kroger will now be able to capitalize on. Gross margins increased in 2014 because of the merger with Harris Teeter, which historically has had slightly larger margins than Kroger without Harris Teeter. From the merger with Harris Teeter, Kroger gained access to Harris Teeter’s “click and collect” system, which allows customers to shop on line through Harris Teeter’s website, and then pick up the products ordered at a nearby Harris Teeter supermarket. This service has been extremely successful for Harris Teeter, and Kroger has expanded the service for its Kroger Supermarkets in the greater Cincinnati area. Kroger has been dabbling with online shopping with its King Soopers stores in Denver, but now they want to make a big push through Harris Teeter’s system. While it is still very early since Kroger rolled out the system into its Kroger Supermarkets, management has had very positive feedback and expects it to be very popular with consumers. On August 18, 2014, Kroger closed its merger with Vitacost.com by purchasing 100% of the Vitacost.com outstanding common stock for $8.00 per share, totaling approximately $287 million. Vitacost.com provides health and wellness products sold directly through its website. It is a leading online retailer of these products, and the merger with Vitacost.com gives Kroger access to extensive e- commerce platform, which can be combined with Kroger’s resources and loyal customer base, to create an even more personalized experience for customers. Diversified Store Formats and Product Offerings As mentioned earlier, Kroger has a variety of different store formats that span across the United States, ranging from big box retail to convenient stores. Furthermore, within these stores are a wide array of products that range from value to premium. The geographic, store, and product diversification provides Kroger with stable revenues that are protected from regional macroeconomic trends. Furthermore, Kroger is able to capitalize on a wide array of customers based on price. Going forward, Kroger will continue to fill their current channels as well as expand into new markets. The dynamic and proven store Figure 13: Capital Expenditures Projections Source: Kroger 10-K and UOIG Spreads 0.00 500.00 1,000.00 1,500.00 2,000.00 2,500.00 3,000.00 3,500.00 4,000.00 4,500.00 2015E 2017E 2019E 2021E 2023E Millions($) Figure 14: EBITDA Projections Source: Kroger 10-K and UOIG Spreads 0.00 500.00 1,000.00 1,500.00 2,000.00 2,500.00 3,000.00 3,500.00 4,000.00 4,500.00 2015E 2017E 2019E 2021E 2023E Millions($) Figure 15: Kroger Store Geographical Distribution Source: Kroger 2013 Factbook
  • 7. UOIG 7 University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015 formats will provide Kroger the ability to open the type of stores that cater best to the region they occupy. Business Growth Strategies Geographic Growth Kroger operates exclusively in the United States. They have over 3500 stores and recently increased their presence in the southeast portion of the United States, as well as the mid-Atlantic through their acquisition of Harris Teeter, which closed in early 2014. The southeast United States is rapidly growing, and has outpaced the population growth of the United States as a whole in the past few years and is projected to keep this pace. Kroger’s sales success is greatly determined by the amount of people that shop at their stores. Therefore, the fast growing population of the southeast should bolster their revenue streams. In early 2015, Kroger registered as a company in Hawaii, and recently registered their pharmaceutical segment as well. Hawaii is currently home to chains such as Albertson, Safeway, Wal-Mart, Japan-based Don Quijote, and various local stores. However, since the Albertsons-Safeway merger, the future of the Albertson’s stores in Hawaii has been uncertain, and provides an opportunity for Kroger to expand its business. Kroger, with its pricing power and superior management, should be able to compete and thrive in the Hawaiian market, even with high rental rates and land costs. This expansion will boost sales and market share. Organic Growth Kroger is the Supermarket and Grocery Store industry leader, and is committed to maintain its position as such. Kroger management believes that the best way for their business to grow is not through acquisitions or mergers, but through organic growth and the development of its core operations. One way they are fostering organic growth and operational efficiency is through the buying out of their current leases. Kroger management believes that by buying out these leases they will reduce costs in the long run, as well as provide more flexibility with their stores. Kroger plans on increasing their capital expenditures in the next few years in order to finance these lease buyouts. Additionally, they plan to remodel stores in order to keep them up to date and attractive to customers. Another way Kroger believes they can grow their business is through the development of their store associates. They believe that by providing their workers with good compensation and exceptional training, they can boost sales and retain customers. Nationally, on average, Kroger associates make an average $14 an hour, compared to $8.81 an hour for Wal-Mart associates. When you include the benefits that Kroger provides its workers, this average is much higher. By taking care of their associates, Kroger can better provide for its customers and their needs, which ultimately leads to higher sales, better margins, and increased customer loyalty. Acquisitions and Online Retail In 2014, Kroger closed two mergers: one with Harris Teeter Supermarkets, and one with Vitacost.com. While the merger with Harris Teeter was primarily for Kroger to expand its operations into the central and southeastern portions of the Figure 16: 2013 Capital Investment Allocation Source: Kroger 2013 Factbook 49% 19% 15% 3% 14% Major Supermarket (including real estate) Minor Supermarket Supermarket Support (Tech & Logistics) Other Retail Other Figure 17: Net Income vs. OG&A Expense Source: Kroger 10-K 0.00 5000.00 10000.00 15000.00 20000.00 25000.00 2010A 2012A 2014A 2016E 2018E 2020E 2022E 2024E Millions($) Figure 18: OG&A Expense per Employee Source: Kroger 10-K and UOIG Spreads 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 50000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Dollars
  • 8. UOIG 8 University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015 east coast of the United States, Kroger also acquired its proprietary “click and collect” online system. This system has been very successful at Harris Teeter supermarkets, and Kroger is currently testing it at some of its supermarkets in the greater Cincinnati area. Additionally, the merger with Vitacost.com allows Kroger to expand its online offerings even more. With many retail chains, such as Wal-Mart, Amazon, and Safeway expanding their online retail services into fresh produce and food, it is very beneficial for Kroger to expand as well. These services are relatively new in the Supermarket and Grocery Store Industry, so by entering the market now, Kroger can leverage its pricing power to attract customers through the reduction of delivery costs. Many of Kroger’s competitors, such as Safeway, charge up to $14.99 in delivery costs. Kroger is known for being able to provide the lowest price on quality prices, and Kroger will be able to do the same with its online orders. By adding these online retail options, Kroger can bring in more customers, and provide a more personalized shopping experience. Proliferation of Natural and Organic A recent trend that has emerged in the United States is the natural and organic foods trend. Coinciding with increased awareness in nutrition, many Americans have begun to more actively seek out natural and organic groceries. Originally, stores like Whole Foods, New Seasons, and Market of Choice enjoyed a first- mover’s advantage, offering unique natural products and brands in which consumers were willing to pay a premium for. However, in the last two years, Kroger has also been able to capitalize on this trend by offering some of the same brands that Whole Foods and other organic stores offer. Furthermore, Kroger has also created a private label, known as “Simple Truth,” which has seen sales rise to $1.2 billion in 2014, just two years after launch. Where previously consumers had to pay a premium to access organic and natural foods, the introduction of Simple Truth and other brands allows consumers to access comparable foods at a much lower price. The success of Simple Truth and Kroger’s other private labels are a significant driver of revenue and allow Kroger to take market share away from Whole Foods and other comparable stores. Going forward, Kroger will continue to develop their brands in order to maintain and capitalize on this growing trend. Management and Employee Relations W. Rodney McMullen – Chairman and CEO Rodney McMullen is the current Chairman and CEO of Kroger. He joined Kroger in 1978 as a part-time stock clerk in Lexington, KY. Before his current position, he was the President and the Chief Operating Officer. He was named Chairman of the Board earlier this year. Mr. McMullen earned a bachelor’s degree in Accounting, a B.B.A. in Finance, and a master’s degree in Accounting from the University of Kentucky. Michael L. Ellis – President and COO Mike Ellis is currently the President and Chief Operating Officer of Kroger. Mike joined Fred Meyer at the age of 16, and has advanced through the ranks up to his current position. Prior to President and COO, he was the senior vice president of Kroger’s retail divisions. Figure 19: Key Management Compensation vs. Net Income Source: Kroger 10-K and UOIG Spreads 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 2010 2011 2012 2013 Millions($) Millions($) Key Executive Compensation Net Income Figure 20: EPS Guidance vs. Actuals Source: Kroger 10-K and UOIG Spreads 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 2012 2013 2014 EPS($) Low High Actual
  • 9. UOIG 9 University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015 J. Michael Schlotman – Senior Vice President and CFO Mike Schlotman is currently the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Kroger. Mike joined Kroger in 1985, and has held a variety of leadership positions. He was named group vice president and chief financial officer in 2000, and was named senior vice president in 2003. Mike earned his bachelor’s degree in Accounting from the University of Kentucky Geoffrey J. Covert – Senior Vice President Geoffrey Covert is the current Senior Vice President of Kroger. He joined Kroger in 1996 as vice president of the Grocery Products Group. In 2010, Geoff was promoted to senior officer of Kroger’s Retail Operations at General Office. He was named to his current role in 2012. Before Kroger, Geoff worked for 22 years in various management positions at Procter & Gamble Co. He received his bachelor’s degree in Chemical Engineering at Case Western Reserve University. Management Guidance Management provides guidance on revenue and EPS for their operations in each fiscal year. Management does not break out their revenue into segments, but instead reports total sales. In recent years, management has consistently met, or beaten their guidance. The revenue model is slightly above management guidance, due to management’s trend to provide beatable guidance. For the fiscal year of 2015, management estimates EPS will between $3.80 and $3.90 a share and sales will be between $111.7 billion and $112.8 billion. Portfolio Strategy Kroger is not currently held in any of the University of Oregon Investment Group’s portfolios. At the moment, the Tall Firs portfolio is underweight in large cap stocks and overweight in consumer goods. While Tall Firs is overweight in Consumer Goods, the portfolio would benefit from additional exposure and diversity to the food and grocery space. Currently, Costco is the only holding that provides this exposure. By adding Kroger to the portfolio, Tall Firs would be better aligned with the market capitalization distribution of the benchmark. Even though Tall Firs is overweight consumer goods, the strong management, consistent top- and bottom-line growth, and its position as a market leader make Kroger a very attractive value buy. Recent News Wal-Mart and Target Are Being Crushed by Supermarkets in the Business of Selling Food – TheStreet – Friday April 17th 2015 Traditional supermarkets like Kroger and Safeway are outperforming mass merchants like Wal-Mart and Target in selling fresh food and packaged goods. In the past year, Kroger posted double digit same-store sales growth, leading to investors pushing up Kroger’s stock price by 66% in the past year, compared to 3.2% and 36% increases by Wal-Mart and Target, respectively. Select pieces of important current news and state explicitly how they affect your company, its stock price, and/or the industry. Figure 21: Revenue Regression Projections Source: Kroger 10-K and UOIG Spreads 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000 160000 180000 2015E 2017E 2019E 2021E 2023E Millions($) CPI PPI US Population One-Year Stock Chart 0 2000000 4000000 6000000 8000000 10000000 12000000 14000000 16000000 $0.00 $10.00 $20.00 $30.00 $40.00 $50.00 $60.00 $70.00 $80.00 $90.00 Nov-13 Jan-14 Mar-14 May-14 Jul-14 Sep-14 Nov-14 Jan-15 Mar-15 Volume Adj Close 50-Day Avg 200-Day Avg Figure 22: Kroger 1 Year Stock Chart Source: Yahoo Finance Figure 23: US Disposable Income per Capita Source: FRED 30000 31000 32000 33000 34000 35000 36000 37000 38000 39000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Dollars
  • 10. UOIG 10 University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015 Kroger Honored by EPA as a 2015 ENERGY STAR® Partner of the Year – PR Newswire – Wednesday April 8th, 2015 Kroger was recognized as an ENERGY STAR® Partner by the EPA for its outstanding efforts and actions to improve the energy efficiency of its buildings and facilities. Kroger has been an ENERGY STAR® Partner since 2010. Some key factors in Kroger’s energy management program include the implementation of best practices for refrigeration, lighting, and HVAC, extensive use of LED lighting in refrigerated cases, and enhanced associate and customer awareness. Since 2000, Kroger has reduced its average grocery store electricity usage by 35%. Catalysts Upside Future acquisitions in the United States, particularly in fast growing urban areas, would allow Kroger to further increase their revenue streams and national market share Faster than anticipated adoption of online grocery technology would allow Kroger to further capitalize on their early position within this market As the American market, particularly lower and middle-income consumers, continue to adopt natural and organic groceries, Kroger’s established and fast-growing natural and organic brands will allow the company to further their customer base and capture additional market share against competitors Downside Unexpectedly heightened levels of competition could force Kroger to further compete on price in order to maintain market, ultimately resulting in deteriorated margins and reduced free cash flow Unprecedented disputes between Kroger and their employees could result in temporarily halted operations that could potentially tarnish the brand image and result in the loss of customers Failure to acquire additional grocery chains could result in the loss of lucrative urban areas and slower than anticipated growth in the coming years Comparable Analysis Kroger is the largest grocer in the United States, operating in over 36 states. While there are other conglomerates of grocery stores in the United States, most of these firms are dramatically smaller than Kroger. As a result, the comparable universe was expanded to include companies in the general food and retail space. The primary criteria used to screen for comparable companies was size, revenue and EBITDA growth, operating margins, and a general exposure to the grocery and food space. Considering the maturity of the industry and the firms within, EV/EBITDA and P/E were the primary metrics used for benchmarking. The rationale for EV/EBITDA is primarily that it provides investors with the truest sense of operational efficiency and cash flows. The rationale for P/E is Figure 24: US Unemployment Rate Source: FRED 0.00% 2.00% 4.00% 6.00% 8.00% 10.00% 12.00% 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 PercentageUnemployed Figure 25: Costco 1 Year Stock Chart Source: Yahoo Finance One-Year Stock Chart 0 2000000 4000000 6000000 8000000 10000000 12000000 $0.00 $20.00 $40.00 $60.00 $80.00 $100.00 $120.00 $140.00 $160.00 $180.00 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 Volume Adj Close 50-Day Avg 200-Day Avg
  • 11. UOIG 11 University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015 that the maturity of the company and the steadiness of the cash flows make it an attractive metric for institutional investors and should thus be considered in our valuation. COST: Costco Company (35%) “The company, formerly known as Costco Companies, Inc., was founded in 1976 and is based in Issaquah, Washington. Costco Wholesale Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, operates membership warehouses. The company offers branded and private-label products in a range of merchandise categories. It provides dry and institutionally packaged foods; snack foods, candy, tobacco, alcoholic and nonalcoholic beverages, and cleaning and institutional supplies; appliances, electronics, health and beauty aids, hardware, garden and patio, and office supplies; meat, bakery, deli, and produce; and apparel, small appliances, and home furnishings. The company also operates gas stations, pharmacies, food courts, optical dispensing centers, photo processing centers, and hearing-aid centers; and engages in the travel business.” -Yahoo! Finance Qualitatively, Costco and Kroger are both large-scale, mature grocers operating primarily in the United States. While Costco is a warehouse club, requiring a yearly payment for membership, the two companies directly compete for consumers and offer many of the same products, including both grocery products as well as fuel services. Furthermore, both companies compete directly on price with consumers. Apart from the warehouse membership, Kroger and Costco have relatively similar business models and similar exposure to macroeconomic factors, especially in the United States. Quantitatively, Costco and Kroger are relatively comparable in size, both having market capitalizations and enterprise values exceeding $35 billion. Revenue and EBITDA growth is also relatively in line for the two firms. Finally, Kroger and Costco have very comparable margins. Comparable business models, similar product offers, direct competition, comparable margins, and similar exposure to macroeconomic trends are all factors considered in a 35% weighting of Costco. SYY: Sysco Company (35%) “Sysco Corporation, through its subsidiaries, markets and distributes a range of food and related products primarily to the foodservice or food-away-from-home industry. It operates in Broadline and SYGMA segments. The company distributes a line of frozen foods, such as meats, seafood, fully prepared entrees, fruits, vegetables, and desserts; a line of canned and dry foods; fresh meats; dairy products; beverage products; imported specialties; and fresh produce. The company offers its products to the restaurants, hospitals and nursing homes, schools and colleges, hotels and motels, industrial caterers, and other foodservice customers through distribution facilities.” Qualitatively, Sysco and Kroger both operate in the United States and provide general food products. Both companies have considerable exposure to the food space within the United States. Sysco does have operations outside of the United States but their primary operations are within the U.S. Quantitatively, Sysco is approximately 3/5ths the size of Kroger in both market capitalization and enterprise value. Both companies have similar volatility and very comparable Debt/EV. In terms of growth, Sysco and Kroger are directly in Figure 26: Kroger vs. Costco Source: UOIG Spreads 0.00% 2.00% 4.00% 6.00% 8.00% 10.00% 12.00% % Revenue Growth 2015E % Revenue Growth 2016E % EBITDA Growth 2015E % EBITDA Growth 2016E % EPS Growth 2015E % EPS Growth 2016E PercentageGrowth Kroger Co. Costco Whole Sale Figure 27: Kroger Margin Projections Source: UOIG Spreads 20.00% 20.20% 20.40% 20.60% 20.80% 21.00% 21.20% 21.40% 2015E 2017E 2019E 2021E 2023E GrossMargin Figure 28: Sysco 1 Year Stock Chart One-Year Stock Chart 0 2000000 4000000 6000000 8000000 10000000 12000000 14000000 $31.00 $32.00 $33.00 $34.00 $35.00 $36.00 $37.00 $38.00 $39.00 $40.00 $41.00 $42.00 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 Volume Adj Close 50-Day Avg 200-Day Avg Source: Yahoo Finance
  • 12. UOIG 12 University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015 line in terms of Revenue, EBIT, and EBITDA going into the NTM. In terms of margins, Kroger and Sysco have very comparable margins across the board. As a result of similar exposure to the United States food space, size, volatility, capital structures, growth prospects and margins, Sysco received a 35% weighting. WMT: Wal-Mart Stores (20%) “The company was founded in 1945 and is headquartered in Bentonville, Arkansas. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. operates retail stores in various formats worldwide. The company operates through three segments: Walmart U.S., Walmart International, and Sam’s Club. It operates discount stores, supermarkets, supercenters, hypermarkets, warehouse clubs, cash and carry stores, home improvement stores, specialty electronics stores, restaurants, apparel stores, drug stores, and convenience stores, as well as retail Websites, such as walmart.com and samsclub.com.” –Yahoo! Finance Qualitatively, Walmart and Kroger are both large-scale retailers that operate primarily in the United States. Walmart currently has some international operations and will continue to look for opportunities to expand. Kroger currently only operates in the United States and currently has no plans to expand outside of the United States. While Kroger primarily offers grocery products, Wal-Mart has a more diversified offering of products, including grocery products. Both Kroger and Wal-Mart have various store formats and generally compete over the same consumer through price and promotion. Quantitatively, Walmart is dramatically larger than Kroger in terms of market capitalization and enterprise value. The two companies share similar betas. Margins are relatively similar for the two firms and growth prospects are both representative of mature companies within the space. Due to the massive size disparity between Walmart and Kroger and different product offers, Wal-Mart received only a 20% weighting in the comparable valuation. TGT: Target Company (5%) “Target Corporation was founded in 1902 and is headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Target Corporation operates as a general merchandise retailer in the United States and Canada. It offers household essentials, including pharmacy, beauty, personal care, baby care, cleaning, and paper products; music, movies, books, computer software, sporting goods, and toys; electronics, such as video game hardware and software; and apparel for women, men, boys, girls, toddlers, infants, and newborns, as well as intimate apparel, jewelry, accessories, and shoes. The company also provides food comprising dry grocery, dairy, frozen food, beverages, candy, snacks, deli, bakery, meat, produce, and pet supplies” – Yahoo! Finance Qualitatively, Target and Kroger are both large-scale retail companies that offer grocery products. While Target does have a wider array of other product offerings, the two companies have similar business models and appeal to similar consumers. Furthermore, both Kroger and Target primarily operate in the United States and this trend will continue as Target continues to exit Canada. Quantitatively, Target and Kroger have very similar market capitalizations and enterprise values as well as comparable betas. Going into 2015 and 2016, both Figure 30: Wal-Mart 1 Year Stock Chart Source: Yahoo Finance One-Year Stock Chart 0 5000000 10000000 15000000 20000000 25000000 $0.00 $10.00 $20.00 $30.00 $40.00 $50.00 $60.00 $70.00 $80.00 $90.00 $100.00 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 Volume Adj Close 50-Day Avg 200-Day Avg Figure 31: Target 1 Year Stock Chart Source: Yahoo Finance One-Year Stock Chart 0 5000000 10000000 15000000 20000000 25000000 30000000 $0.00 $10.00 $20.00 $30.00 $40.00 $50.00 $60.00 $70.00 $80.00 $90.00 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 Volume Adj Close 50-Day Avg 200-Day Avg 0.00% 2.00% 4.00% 6.00% 8.00% 10.00% 12.00% % Revenue Growth 2015E % Revenue Growth 2016E % EBITDA Growth 2015E % EBITDA Growth 2016E % EPS Growth 2015E % EPS Growth 2016E PercentageGrowth Figure 29: Kroger vs. Sysco Source: UOIG Spreads
  • 13. UOIG 13 University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015 firms have comparable growth prospects. However, the two companies have different margins, particularly in EBIT and EBITDA. Target and Kroger are comparable in size, business model, geographic operations, and product offerings. However, considering varying margins, Target was weighted 5%. WFM: Whole Foods Market (5%) “Whole Foods Market, Inc. operates as a retailer of natural and organic foods. The company’s stores offer produce and floral, grocery, meat, seafood, bakery, prepared foods and catering, coffee, tea, beer, wine, cheese, nutritional supplements, vitamins, and body care products, as well as lifestyle products, including books, pet products, and household products. As of November 5, 2014, the company had 401 stores in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Whole Foods Market, Inc. was founded in 1978 and is headquartered in Austin, Texas” Qualitatively, Whole Foods and Kroger both operate throughout the United States and offer grocery products. Whole Foods is generally categorized as a premium natural and organic foods supplier whereas Kroger is more of a general grocer. However, a recent trend within Kroger’s stores has been natural and organic foods produced under their Simple Truth brand, growing to $1.2 billion in sales in just two years. That being said, there is still a considerable difference in the type of consumers that Whole Foods and Kroger attracts. Quantitatively, Whole Foods is approximately half the size of Kroger, has widely varying margins, and much larger growth rates in the next years. Considering the qualitative and quantitative factors listed above, Whole Foods has received a 5% weighting. Discounted Cash Flow Analysis Revenue Model The revenue model was created by first calculating historical revenue per square foot. From there, revenue per square foot was projected out using a Multiple Linear Regression model. Various factors were screened for the model. Such factors were Total US Population, Average Disposable Income Per Capita, National Unemployment Rate, the Producer Price Index, and the Consumer Price Index. From there, multicollinearity tests were conducted to choose the proper inputs for the regression. After running various tests, it was found that Total US Population, the Producer Price Index, and the Consumer Price Index would be the best predictors of future revenue per square foot. Instead of including all of these factors in one regression, however, three separate regressions were used with only one of these factors, because of the multicollinearity and high standard errors that occurred when including all 3 factors in one regression. Each of these three regressions also include three dummy variables that controlled for effects caused by seasonality. Once the regression statistics were calculated with each factor, revenue per square foot was projected into 2024. Total square footage was also projected out using historical data, management guidance, and a Simple Linear Regression. This was also forecasted into 2024. To calculate total revenue, Figure 32: Whole Foods 1 Year Stock Chart Source: Yahoo Finance One-Year Stock Chart 0 10000000 20000000 30000000 40000000 50000000 60000000 $0.00 $10.00 $20.00 $30.00 $40.00 $50.00 $60.00 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 Volume Adj Close 50-Day Avg 200-Day Avg Figure 33: Kroger vs. Whole Foods Source: UOIG Spreads 0.00% 2.00% 4.00% 6.00% 8.00% 10.00% 12.00% 14.00% % Revenue Growth 2015E % Revenue Growth 2016E % EBITDA Growth 2015E % EBITDA Growth 2016E % EPS Growth 2015E % EPS Growth 2016E PercentageGrowth Figure 34: Regression Weighting Source: UOIG Spreads Multiple Weight CPI Regression 33.33% PPI Regression 33.33% US Population Regression 33.33%
  • 14. UOIG 14 University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015 each of values of revenue per square foot were multiplied by their respective total square footage during that quarter. From there, all four quarters of each year were summed up to produce the total revenue of the year. For the final revenue model, a weighted average of the revenue models produced by each of the regressions was used. This allowed the final revenue model to contain each of the inputs while maintaining a high adjusted R-squared and minimizing standard errors. Cost of Goods Sold Cost of goods sold were projected to slightly increase from 78.74% in 2014 to 79.00% of revenue in the terminal year. The slight increase in cost of goods sold is meant to reflect a competitive landscape and potential price competition that will emerge from the recent markets Kroger has entered. Considering that price is a primary factor in consumers’ decision, Kroger will continue to heavily compete on price. However, while Kroger will continue to invest in prices, this increase in cost of goods sold is off-set by the successful implementation of in- house private brands, including Simple Truth, which have amassed $1.2 billion in the two mere years since entering Kroger stores. Operating Expenses Operating, General and Administrative (OG&A) Expenses: Operating, General, and Administrative expenses are primarily composed of employee wages, salaries and benefits. Comparing 2012 to 2014, OG&A expense as a percentage of revenue has increased by about 50 basis points. In 2012, Kroger re-crafted their strategic plan, shifting towards a more employee focused direction. The results have, notable in their sales and market performance, paid off. Kroger has stated that they will continue to move in this direction as it has been very successful. As a result, we have OG&A increasing slightly as a percentage of revenue going into the terminal year. Depreciation and Amortization: Depreciation and Amortization was projected out as a percentage of beginning plant, property and equipment. Historical averages were used to determine the rate as the last 5-years have produced a close band of percentages between 11.42% and 11.58%. Rent: Rent is projected to continue to decrease as a percentage of revenue going into the terminal year as Kroger has recently adopted the philosophy of owning the land their stores operate on. As noted in the capital expenditures, as Kroger continues to purchase the leases and land, rent expense as percentage of revenue will continue to decrease. Net Working Capital Working Capital was primarily projected off historical averages and days outstanding. Two exceptions are accounts receivable and accounts payable which have shown an increasing and decreasing trend in the past five years. The models reflect these trends. Figure 35: CPI Regression Statistics Source: UOIG Spreads Multiple R 0.97 R Square 0.94 Adjusted R Square 0.94 Standard Error 7.20 Observations 60 Figure 36: PPI Regression Statistics Source: UOIG Spreads Multiple R 0.98 R Square 0.96 Adjusted R Square 0.95 Standard Error 6.29 Observations 60 Figure 37: US Population Regression Statistics Source: UOIG Spreads Multiple R 0.96 R Square 0.93 Adjusted R Square 0.92 Standard Error 8.10 Observations 60 Figure 38: Beta Table Source: UOIG Spreads Beta SE Weighting 1-Year Daily 0.65 0.08 0.00% 3-Year Daily 0.76 0.05 15.00% 5-Year Daily 0.63 0.03 25.00% 10-Year Daily 0.60 0.02 20.00% 15-Year Daily 0.58 0.02 15.00% 25-Year Daily 0.66 0.02 12.50% 38-Year Daily 0.69 0.02 5.00% 5-Year Weekly 0.58 0.07 0.00% 10-Year Weekly 0.55 0.05 2.50% Kroger Co. Beta 0.64
  • 15. UOIG 15 University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015 Capital Expenditures Capital expenditures primarily consists of costs associate with building new stores, revamping older stores, and purchasing leases and land. Capital expenditures are modeled to increase by 14 basis points as a percentage of revenue in 2018 before trending back towards historical averages. In recent years Kroger has adopted the philosophy of owning their stores and will continue to buy-out leases in the coming years. Beta The estimated beta for Kroger Company is 0.64. The beta was calculated by calculating the weighted averages of the Vasicek, Hamada, and regressed betas. For regressions, the S&P 500 was used as Kroger is a large-cap company. 3, 5, 10, 15, 25, and 38-year dailies were used as well as a 10 year weekly. Each of the above regressions yielded a close band of betas ranging from 0.55 to 0.76. Standard errors were the primary criteria used to determine weightings for the regressions. The weighting of shorter-term and longer-term regressions is appropriate as it provides both a long-term picture of the stability and matureness while also reflecting more contemporary evolutions of the industry. The close band of regressed betas, from both short and long-term periods, corroborates this. Hamada and Vasicek betas were also calculated using both comparable companies and ETFs. The calculated betas were not weighted as the companies included within our comps and our ETFs are drastically different in both size and business operations. While they do provide insight into the large industry as a whole, the regressed betas offer a tight range of betas that are more reflective of Kroger’s true beta. Tax Rate The tax rate was determined using primarily management guidance. Previously the tax rate has been slightly below the 35% US Corporate tax rate as tax breaks and credits have been used. However, these breaks and credits are largely unpredictable and therefore for the sake of conservatism, the US Corporate tax rate was used. Cost of Debt Cost of debt was determined by using a weighted average of current rates on Kroger’s outstanding debt. Recommendation As the leader in its industry and a provider of quality service and products, Kroger is a strong value play. With consistent revenue growth, strong management, a commitment to customer service and quality, as well as its geographic expansion and online retail development, Kroger is poised to continue its success and even increase its market share. Additionally, its increased organic and natural offerings will spur revenue and increase its market share. A weighting of 75% was given to the Discounted Cash Flow Analysis, while a weighting of 25% was given to the Comparable Analysis, giving a final Figure 41: Share Sensitivity Table Source: UOIG Spreads Figure 40: Tax Rate Sensitivity Table Source: UOIG Spreads Figure 39: Beta Sensitivity Table Source: UOIG Spreads Undervalued/(Overvalued) Terminal Growth Rate 0 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% 0.60 (8.98%) 5.86% 26.50% 57.12% 107.30% 0.62 (12.52%) 1.35% 20.43% 48.34% 93.06% 0.64 (15.88%) (2.90%) 14.79% 40.31% 80.37% 0.66 (19.07%) (6.91%) 9.52% 32.94% 68.99% 0.68 (22.10%) (10.69%) 4.60% 26.14% 58.73% AdjustedBeta Undervalued/(Overvalued) Terminal Growth Rate 0 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% 25% (19.51%) (7.45%) 8.81% 31.94% 67.48% 30% (17.72%) (5.21%) 11.74% 36.03% 73.73% 35% (15.88%) (2.90%) 14.79% 40.31% 80.37% 40% (13.99%) (.51%) 17.96% 44.81% 87.44% 45% (12.03%) 1.97% 21.26% 49.53% 94.97% TaxRate Undervalued/(Overvalued) Terminal Growth Rate 0 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% 482 (12.32%) 1.21% 19.65% 46.25% 88.01% 492 (14.10%) (.85%) 17.21% 43.28% 84.19% 502 (15.81%) (2.82%) 14.88% 40.43% 80.52% 512 (17.46%) (4.72%) 12.64% 37.68% 76.99% 522 (19.04%) (6.55%) 10.48% 35.05% 73.60% Outstanding Shares
  • 16. UOIG 16 University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015 price target of $83.47, implying an undervaluation of 18.31%. Because of this price target, it is recommended that Kroger will outperform and should be added to the Tall Firs portfolio. Figure 42: Final Price Target Source: UOIG Spreads Source Implied Price Weighting Discounted Cash Flow Analysis $80.98 75% Comparable Analysis 90.93 25% Weighted Implied Price $83.47 Current Price $70.55 Undervalued 18.31%
  • 17. UOIG 17 University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015 Appendix 1 – Comparable Analysis Comparables Analysis KR TGT WFM WMT SYY COST ($ in millions) Kroger Co. Target Co. Whole Foods Market, Inc. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Sysco Co. Costco Whole Sale Stock Characteristics Max Min Median Weight Avg. 5.00% 5.00% 20.00% 35.00% 35.00% Current Price $148.96 $37.77 $79.24 $87.91 $70.55 $83.15 $50.99 $79.24 $37.77 $148.96 Beta 0.96 0.53 0.71 0.68 0.64 0.65 0.96 0.53 0.71 0.71 Size Short-TermDebt 6,689.00 2.00 311.35 1,871.42 1,885.00 91.00 2.00 6,689.00 311.35 1,200.00 Long-TermDebt 43,692.00 60.00 7,248.46 13,254.11 9,771.00 12,705.00 60.00 43,692.00 7,248.46 3,830.00 Cash and Cash Equivalent 9,135.00 852.00 4,907.68 6,306.34 1,256.00 2,210.00 852.00 9,135.00 4,907.68 7,453.00 Non-Controlling Interest 4,543.00 - 34.94 997.48 30.00 - - 4,543.00 34.94 219.00 Preferred Stock - - - - - - - - - - Diluted Basic Shares 3,243.00 370.50 592.34 1,060.44 502.41 640.10 370.50 3,243.00 592.34 439.97 Market Capitalization 256,975.32 18,891.80 53,224.32 85,769.84 35,163.48 53,224.32 18,891.80 256,975.32 22,372.79 65,538.57 Enterprise Value 302,764.32 18,101.80 63,334.57 95,586.52 45,593.48 63,810.32 18,101.80 302,764.32 25,059.85 63,334.57 Growth Expectations % Revenue Growth 2015E 10.93% 1.38% 5.01% 4.64% 4.94% 2.28% 10.93% 1.38% 5.01% 5.58% % Revenue Growth 2016E 11.23% 2.72% 3.35% 4.61% 4.60% 2.72% 11.23% 3.06% 3.35% 6.09% % EBITDA Growth 2015E 11.79% -0.54% 7.22% 6.93% 4.51% 7.22% 9.52% -0.54% 5.94% 11.79% % EBITDA Growth 2016E 10.62% 2.98% 7.90% 7.04% 4.18% 3.57% 10.62% 2.98% 8.50% 7.90% % EPS Growth 2015E 11.46% -3.17% 6.76% 4.78% 10.24% 6.76% 11.46% -3.17% 6.10% 6.77% % EPS Growth 2016E 11.84% 5.28% 8.88% 8.26% 10.52% 9.15% 11.84% 5.28% 8.70% 8.88% Profitability Margins Gross Margin 35.20% 11.47% 24.31% 18.06% 21.15% 26.45% 35.20% 24.31% 17.45% 11.47% EBIT Margin 7.54% 2.85% 5.42% 4.17% 2.85% 7.54% 6.47% 5.42% 3.77% 3.05% EBITDA Margin 10.48% 3.97% 7.37% 5.57% 4.67% 10.48% 9.13% 7.37% 4.94% 3.97% Net Margin 4.00% 1.58% 3.20% 2.49% 1.58% 3.37% 4.00% 3.20% 2.27% 1.95% Credit Metrics Interest Expense $2,487.00 $0.00 $134.00 $615.45 $487.00 $632.00 $0.00 $2,487.00 $134.00 $113.00 Debt/EV 0.30 0.00 0.17 0.18 0.26 0.20 0.00 0.17 0.30 0.08 Leverage Ratio 3.03 0.04 1.39 1.79 2.12 1.76 0.04 1.39 3.03 1.04 Interest Coverage Ratio 42.86 0.00 10.73 24.06 11.27 8.02 0.00 10.73 18.62 42.86 Operating Results Revenue $492,348.80 $15,745.98 $74,276.89 $163,379.50 $112,500.00 $74,276.89 $15,746 $492,348.80 $50,506.00 $122,090.00 Gross Profit $119,672.34 $5,542.47 $14,002.00 $33,293.74 $23,797.00 $21,944.92 $5,542 $119,672.34 $8,812.00 $14,002.00 EBIT $26,690.31 $1,018.64 $3,718.00 $7,609.71 $3,444.00 $5,067.39 $1,019 $26,690.31 $1,903.00 $3,718.00 EBITDA $36,272.51 $1,437.70 $4,843.00 $10,257.35 $5,489.00 $7,253.35 $1,438 $36,272.51 $2,495.00 $4,843.00 Net Income $15,772.28 $629.16 $2,375.00 $4,562.26 $1,904.00 $2,858.94 $629 $15,772.28 $1,149.00 $2,375.00 Capital Expenditures $12,292.97 $572.00 $2,140.56 $3,677.59 $3,077.00 $2,140.56 $770 $12,292.97 $572.00 $2,495.00 Multiples EV/Revenue 1.15x 0.41x 0.61x 0.58x 0.41x 0.86x 1.15x 0.61x 0.50x 0.52x EV/Gross Profit 4.52 1.92 2.91 3.39 1.92 2.91 3.27 2.53 2.84 4.52 EV/EBIT 17.77 11.34 13.17 14.36 13.24 12.59 17.77 11.34 13.17 17.03 EV/EBITDA 13.08 8.31 10.04 10.83 8.31 8.80 12.59 8.35 10.04 13.08 EV/(EBITDA-Capex) 27.13 12.48 13.03 18.51 18.90 12.48 27.13 12.63 13.03 26.97 Market Cap/Net Income = P/E 30.03 16.29 19.47 22.16 18.47 18.62 30.03 16.29 19.47 27.60 Multiple Implied Price Weight EV/Revenue 108.87 0.00% EV/Gross Profit 140.02 0.00% EV/EBIT 77.72 20.00% EV/EBITDA 97.64 60.00% EV/(EBITDA-Capex) 68.15 0.00% Market Cap/Net Income = P/E 84.00 20.00% Price Target $90.93 Current Price 70.55 Undervalued 28.88%
  • 18. UOIG 18 University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015 Appendix 2 – Discounted Cash Flows Valuation DiscountedCash FlowAnalysis ($ in millions) 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 2014A 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E 2023E 2024E Total Revenue $82,189.00 $90,374.00 $96,751.00 $98,375.00 $108,465.00 $113,818.52 $119,057.50 $124,404.90 $129,861.27 $135,427.16 $141,103.15 $146,889.79 $152,787.66 $158,797.35 $164,919.44 % YoY Growth 7.11% 9.96% 7.06% 1.68% 10.26% 4.94% 4.60% 4.49% 4.39% 4.29% 4.19% 4.10% 4.02% 3.93% 3.86% Cost of Goods Sold 63,803.00 71,389.00 76,726.00 78,138.00 85,512.00 $89,751.03 $93,901.44 98,139.08 102,464.44 106,877.99 111,380.24 115,971.69 120,652.85 125,424.24 130,286.36 % Revenue 77.63% 78.99% 79.30% 79.43% 78.84% 78.85% 78.87% 78.89% 78.90% 78.92% 78.94% 78.95% 78.97% 78.98% 79.00% Gross Profit $18,386.00 $18,985.00 $20,025.00 $20,237.00 $22,953.00 $24,067.49 $25,156.05 $26,265.81 $27,396.83 $28,549.17 $29,722.91 $30,918.10 $32,134.81 $33,373.12 $34,633.08 Gross Margin 22.37% 21.01% 20.70% 20.57% 21.16% 21.15% 21.13% 21.11% 21.10% 21.08% 21.06% 21.05% 21.03% 21.02% 21.00% Operating, General and Adminstrative 13,823.00 15,345.00 14,849.00 15,196.00 17,161.00 18,056.77 18,938.90 19,842.81 20,768.73 21,716.89 22,687.52 23,680.85 24,697.12 25,736.56 26,799.41 % Revenue 16.82% 16.98% 15.35% 15.45% 15.82% 15.86% 15.91% 15.95% 15.99% 16.04% 16.08% 16.12% 16.16% 16.21% 16.25% Depreciation and Amortization 1,600.00 1,638.00 1,652.00 1,703.00 1,948.00 2,065.51 2,198.11 2,337.29 2,483.07 2,635.50 2,777.73 2,910.34 3,033.84 3,148.64 3,255.07 % of Beginning PP&E 11.58% 11.58% 11.42% 11.47% 11.53% 11.53% 11.53% 11.53% 11.53% 11.53% 11.53% 11.53% 11.53% 11.53% 11.53% Rent 623.00 619.00 628.00 613.00 707.00 696.16 680.36 660.93 637.74 610.66 579.55 544.30 504.76 460.80 412.30 % Revenue 0.76% .68% .65% .62% .65% .61% .57% .53% .49% .45% .41% .37% .33% .29% .25% Earnings Before Interest & Taxes $2,340.00 $1,383.00 $2,896.00 $2,725.00 $3,137.00 $3,249.06 $3,338.68 $3,424.78 $3,507.28 $3,586.12 $3,678.11 $3,782.61 $3,899.09 $4,027.12 $4,166.31 % Revenue 2.85% 1.53% 2.99% 2.77% 2.89% 2.85% 2.80% 2.75% 2.70% 2.65% 2.61% 2.58% 2.55% 2.54% 2.53% Interest Expense 448.00 435.00 462.00 443.00 488.00 480.00 535.76 559.82 584.38 609.42 634.96 661.00 687.54 714.59 742.14 % of Revenue 0.55% .48% .48% .45% .45% .48% .48% .48% .48% .48% .48% .48% .48% .48% .48% Earnings Before Taxes 1,892.00 948.00 2,434.00 2,282.00 2,649.00 2,769.06 2,802.93 2,864.96 2,922.91 2,976.70 3,043.14 3,121.60 3,211.55 3,312.53 3,424.17 % Revenue 2.30% 1.05% 2.52% 2.32% 2.44% 2.43% 2.35% 2.30% 2.25% 2.20% 2.16% 2.13% 2.10% 2.09% 2.08% Less Taxes (Benefits) 601.00 247.00 794.00 751.00 902.00 969.17 981.02 1,002.73 1,023.02 1,041.84 1,065.10 1,092.56 1,124.04 1,159.39 1,198.46 TaxRate 31.77% 26.05% 32.62% 32.91% 34.05% 35.00% 35.00% 35.00% 35.00% 35.00% 35.00% 35.00% 35.00% 35.00% 35.00% Net Income $1,291.00 $701.00 $1,640.00 $1,531.00 $1,747.00 $1,799.89 $1,821.90 $1,862.22 $1,899.89 $1,934.85 $1,978.04 $2,029.04 $2,087.51 $2,153.15 $2,225.71 Net Margin 1.57% .78% 1.70% 1.56% 1.61% 1.58% 1.53% 1.50% 1.46% 1.43% 1.40% 1.38% 1.37% 1.36% 1.35% Add Back: Depreciation and Amortization 1,600.00 1,638.00 1,652.00 1,703.00 1,948.00 2,065.51 2,198.11 2,337.29 2,483.07 2,635.50 2,777.73 2,910.34 3,033.84 3,148.64 3,255.07 Add Back: Interest Expense*(1-TaxRate) 305.69 321.66 311.29 297.21 321.83 312.00 348.24 363.88 379.84 396.12 412.73 429.65 446.90 464.48 482.39 Operating Cash Flow $3,196.69 $2,660.66 $3,603.29 $3,531.21 $4,016.83 $4,177.39 $4,368.25 $4,563.39 $4,762.81 $4,966.48 $5,168.50 $5,369.04 $5,568.26 $5,766.27 $5,963.17 % Revenue 3.89% 2.94% 3.72% 3.59% 3.70% 3.67% 3.67% 3.67% 3.67% 3.67% 3.66% 3.66% 3.64% 3.63% 3.62% Current Assets 6,130.00 6,351.00 6,766.00 7,471.00 7,655.00 8,130.60 8,513.96 8,905.89 9,306.45 9,715.70 10,133.71 10,560.54 10,996.27 11,440.95 11,933.77 % Revenue 7.46% 7.03% 6.99% 7.59% 7.06% 7.14% 7.15% 7.16% 7.17% 7.17% 7.18% 7.19% 7.20% 7.20% 7.24% Current Liabilities 7,482.00 7,790.00 8,327.00 9,048.00 9,518.00 9,921.76 10,341.34 10,746.88 11,160.74 11,578.96 12,001.44 12,430.12 12,864.85 13,305.48 13,751.86 % Revenue 9.10% 8.62% 8.61% 9.20% 8.78% 8.72% 8.69% 8.64% 8.59% 8.55% 8.51% 8.46% 8.42% 8.38% 8.34% Net Working Capital ($1,352.00) ($1,439.00) ($1,561.00) ($1,577.00) ($1,863.00) ($1,791.16) ($1,827.37) ($1,840.98) ($1,854.29) ($1,863.26) ($1,867.73) ($1,869.58) ($1,868.58) ($1,864.52) ($1,818.09) % Revenue (1.64%) (1.59%) (1.61%) (1.60%) (1.72%) (1.57%) (1.53%) (1.48%) (1.43%) (1.38%) (1.32%) (1.27%) (1.22%) (1.17%) (1.10%) Change in Working Capital - ($87.00) ($122.00) ($16.00) ($286.00) $71.84 ($36.21) ($13.61) ($13.31) ($8.97) ($4.47) ($1.85) $1.00 $4.06 $46.43 Capital Expenditures 1,919.00 1,898.00 2,062.00 2,330.00 2,831.00 3,010.55 3,190.78 3,377.61 3,571.18 3,625.12 3,673.78 3,716.92 3,754.33 3,785.77 3,811.01 % Revenue 2.33% 2.10% 2.13% 2.37% 2.61% 2.65% 2.68% 2.72% 2.75% 2.68% 2.60% 2.53% 2.46% 2.38% 2.31% Acquisitions 7.00 51.00 122.00 2,344.00 252.00 204.87 214.30 223.93 233.75 243.77 253.99 264.40 275.02 285.84 296.85 % Revenue 0.01% .06% .13% 2.38% .23% .18% .18% .18% .18% .18% .18% .18% .18% .18% .18% UnleveredFree Cash Flow $1,270.69 $798.66 $1,541.29 -$1,126.79 $1,219.83 $890.13 $999.38 $975.47 $971.18 $1,106.56 $1,245.21 $1,389.57 $1,537.91 $1,690.60 $1,808.87 DiscountedFree Cash Flow 846.24 903.25 838.16 793.33 859.35 919.34 975.33 1,026.22 1,072.48 1,090.93
  • 19. UOIG 19 University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015 Appendix 3 – Revenue Model Multiple Weight CPI Regression 33.33% PPI Regression 33.33% US Population Regression 33.33% CPI Regression Revenue Model ($ in millions) 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 2014A 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E 2023E 2024E Total Revenue $82,189.00 $90,374.00 $96,751.00 $98,375.00 $108,465.00 $113,859.89 $119,019.96 $124,274.73 $129,624.22 $135,068.40 $140,607.30 $146,240.91 $151,969.22 $157,792.24 $163,709.96 % Growth 7.38% 9.96% 7.06% 1.68% 10.26% 4.97% 4.53% 4.42% 4.30% 4.20% 4.10% 4.01% 3.92% 3.83% 3.75% PPI Regression Revenue Model ($ in millions) 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 2014A 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E 2023E 2024E Total Revenue $82,189.00 $90,374.00 $96,751.00 $98,375.00 $108,465.00 $113,840.85 $118,998.19 $124,250.17 $129,596.80 $135,038.07 $140,573.98 $146,204.54 $151,929.74 $157,749.58 $163,664.06 % Growth 7.38% 9.96% 7.06% 1.68% 10.26% 4.96% 4.53% 4.41% 4.30% 4.20% 4.10% 4.01% 3.92% 3.83% 3.75% Weighted Revenue Model ($ in millions) 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 2014A 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E 2023E 2024E Total Revenue $82,189.00 $90,374.00 $96,751.00 $98,375.00 $108,465.00 $113,818.52 $119,057.50 $124,404.90 $129,861.27 $135,427.16 $141,103.15 $146,889.79 $152,787.66 $158,797.35 $164,919.44 % Growth 7.38% 9.96% 7.06% 1.68% 10.26% 4.94% 4.60% 4.49% 4.39% 4.29% 4.19% 4.10% 4.02% 3.93% 3.86% US Population Regression Revenue Model ($ in millions) 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 2014A 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E 2023E 2024E Total Revenue $82,189.00 $90,374.00 $96,751.00 $98,375.00 $108,465.00 $113,754.82 $119,154.35 $124,689.78 $130,362.78 $136,175.01 $142,128.15 $148,223.92 $154,464.04 $160,850.24 $167,384.30 % Growth 7.38% 9.96% 7.06% 1.68% 10.26% 4.88% 4.75% 4.65% 4.55% 4.46% 4.37% 4.29% 4.21% 4.13% 4.06%
  • 20. UOIG 20 University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015 Appendix 4 – Working Capital Model Working Capital Model ($ in millions) 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 2014A 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E 2023E 2024E Total Revenue $82,189.00 $90,374.00 $96,751.00 $98,375.00 $108,465.00 $113,818.52 $119,057.50 $124,404.90 $129,861.27 $135,427.16 $141,103.15 $146,889.79 $152,787.66 $158,797.35 $164,919.44 Current Assets Accounts Receivable 845.00 949.00 1,051.00 1,116.00 1,266.00 1,335.96 1,405.27 1,476.56 1,549.85 1,625.18 1,702.56 1,782.03 1,863.61 1,947.35 2,033.25 Days Sales Outstanding A/R 3.75 3.83 3.96 4.14 4.26 4.28 4.31 4.33 4.36 4.38 4.40 4.43 4.45 4.48 4.50 % of Revenue 1.03% 1.05% 1.09% 1.13% 1.17% 1.17% 1.18% 1.19% 1.19% 1.20% 1.21% 1.21% 1.22% 1.23% 1.23% FIFO Inventory 5,793.00 6,157.00 6,244.00 6,801.00 6,933.00 7,276.68 7,613.19 7,956.76 8,307.44 8,665.28 9,030.30 9,402.56 9,782.09 10,168.94 10,563.14 Days Inventory Outstanding 33.14 31.48 29.70 31.77 29.59 29.59 29.59 29.59 29.59 29.59 29.59 29.59 29.59 29.59 29.59 % of Revenue 7.05% 6.81% 6.45% 6.91% 6.39% 6.39% 6.39% 6.40% 6.40% 6.40% 6.40% 6.40% 6.40% 6.40% 6.41% LIFO Reserve (827.00) (1,043.00) (1,098.00) (1,150.00) (1,245.00) (1,217.65) (1,273.96) (1,331.45) (1,390.13) (1,450.01) (1,511.09) (1,573.38) (1,636.89) (1,701.62) (1,767.59) % of FIFO Inventory (14.28%) (16.94%) (17.58%) (16.91%) (17.96%) (16.73%) (16.73%) (16.73%) (16.73%) (16.73%) (16.73%) (16.73%) (16.73%) (16.73%) (16.73%) % of Revenue (1.01%) (1.15%) (1.13%) (1.17%) (1.15%) (1.07%) (1.07%) (1.07%) (1.07%) (1.07%) (1.07%) (1.07%) (1.07%) (1.07%) (1.07%) Prepaid and Other Current Assets 319.00 288.00 569.00 704.00 701.00 735.60 769.46 804.02 839.28 875.25 911.94 949.34 987.45 1,026.29 1,104.96 % of Revenue .39% .32% .59% .72% .65% .65% .65% .65% .65% .65% .65% .65% .65% .65% .67% Total Current Assets $6,130.00 $6,351.00 $6,766.00 $7,471.00 $7,655.00 $8,130.60 $8,513.96 $8,905.89 $9,306.45 $9,715.70 $10,133.71 $10,560.54 $10,996.27 $11,440.95 $11,933.77 % of Revenue 7.46% 7.03% 6.99% 7.59% 7.06% 7.14% 7.15% 7.16% 7.17% 7.17% 7.18% 7.19% 7.20% 7.20% 7.24% Long Term Assets Net PP&E Beginning 13,821.00 14,147.00 14,464.00 14,848.00 16,893.00 17,912.00 19,061.92 20,268.89 21,533.14 22,855.00 24,088.39 25,238.42 26,309.40 27,304.91 28,227.87 Capital Expenditures 1,919.00 1,898.00 2,062.00 2,330.00 2,831.00 3,010.55 3,190.78 3,377.61 3,571.18 3,625.12 3,673.78 3,716.92 3,754.33 3,785.77 3,811.01 Acquisitions 7.00 51.00 122.00 2,344.00 252.00 204.87 214.30 223.93 233.75 243.77 253.99 264.40 275.02 285.84 296.85 Depreciation and Amortization 1,600.00 1,638.00 1,652.00 1,703.00 1,948.00 2,065.51 2,198.11 2,337.29 2,483.07 2,635.50 2,777.73 2,910.34 3,033.84 3,148.64 3,255.07 Net PP&E Ending 14,147.00 14,464.00 14,848.00 16,893.00 17,912.00 19,061.92 20,268.89 21,533.14 22,855.00 24,088.39 25,238.42 26,309.40 27,304.91 28,227.87 29,080.67 Total Current Assets & Net PP&E $20,277.00 $20,815.00 $21,614.00 $24,364.00 $25,567.00 $27,192.52 $28,782.85 $30,439.03 $32,161.45 $33,804.09 $35,372.13 $36,869.95 $38,301.18 $39,668.83 $41,014.43 % of Revenue 24.67% 23.03% 22.34% 24.77% 23.57% 23.89% 24.18% 24.47% 24.77% 24.96% 25.07% 25.10% 25.07% 24.98% 24.87% Current Liabilities Accounts Payable 4,227.00 4,329.00 4,484.00 4,881.00 5,052.00 5,263.98 5,467.17 5,671.85 5,877.92 6,085.31 6,293.93 6,503.69 6,714.51 6,926.30 7,138.98 Days Payable Outstanding 24.18 22.13 21.33 22.80 21.56 21.41 21.25 21.09 20.94 20.78 20.63 20.47 20.31 20.16 20.00 % of Revenue 5.14% 4.79% 4.63% 4.96% 4.66% 4.62% 4.59% 4.56% 4.53% 4.49% 4.46% 4.43% 4.39% 4.36% 4.33% Accrued Salaries and Wages 888.00 1,056.00 1,017.00 1,150.00 1,291.00 1,348.18 1,403.40 1,459.28 1,515.82 1,573.01 1,630.83 1,689.27 1,748.32 1,807.96 1,868.19 % of Revenue 1.08% 1.17% 1.05% 1.17% 1.19% 1.18% 1.18% 1.17% 1.17% 1.16% 1.16% 1.15% 1.14% 1.14% 1.13% Income Taxes Payable 220.00 190.00 288.00 248.00 287.00 310.56 333.68 337.76 345.24 352.22 358.70 366.71 376.16 387.00 399.17 % of Revenue .27% .21% .30% .25% .26% .27% .28% .27% .27% .26% .25% .25% .25% .24% .24% Other Current Liabilities 2,147.00 2,215.00 2,538.00 2,769.00 2,888.00 2,999.04 3,137.09 3,277.99 3,421.76 3,568.42 3,717.97 3,870.45 4,025.85 4,184.20 4,345.52 % of Revenue 2.61% 2.45% 2.62% 2.81% 2.66% 2.63% 2.63% 2.63% 2.63% 2.63% 2.63% 2.63% 2.63% 2.63% 2.63% Total Current Liabilities $7,482.00 $7,790.00 $8,327.00 $9,048.00 $9,518.00 $9,921.76 $10,341.34 $10,746.88 $11,160.74 $11,578.96 $12,001.44 $12,430.12 $12,864.85 $13,305.48 $13,751.86 % of Revenue 9.10% 8.62% 8.61% 9.20% 8.78% 8.72% 8.69% 8.64% 8.59% 8.55% 8.51% 8.46% 8.42% 8.38% 8.34%
  • 21. UOIG 21 University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015 Appendix 5 – Income Statement Appendix 6 – Balance Sheet Balance Sheet ($ in millions) 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 2014A 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E 2023E 2024E Assets Current Assets Cash and Cash Equivalents 825.00$ 188.00$ 238.00$ 401.00$ 268.00$ 261.74$ 229.52$ 565.82$ 411.10$ 804.33$ 1,298.12$ 1,647.48$ 2,055.70$ 3,076.43$ 3,974.57$ Deposits in Transit 666.00 786.00 955.00 958.00 988.00 1,058.51 1,084.75 1,133.47 1,183.19 1,233.90 1,285.61 1,338.34 1,392.07 1,446.83 1,502.61 Receivables 845.00 949.00 1,051.00 1,116.00 1,266.00 1,335.96 1,405.27 1,476.56 1,549.85 1,625.18 1,702.56 1,782.03 1,863.61 1,947.35 2,033.25 Inventory 4,966.00 5,114.00 5,146.00 5,651.00 5,688.00 6,059.04 6,339.23 6,625.31 6,917.31 7,215.27 7,519.21 7,829.18 8,145.20 8,467.32 8,795.55 Prepaid and Other Current Assets 319.00 288.00 569.00 704.00 701.00 735.60 769.46 804.02 839.28 875.25 911.94 949.34 987.45 1,026.29 1,104.96 Total Current Assets 7,621.00 7,325.00 7,959.00 8,830.00 8,911.00 9,450.85 9,828.23 10,605.18 10,900.73 11,753.93 12,717.44 13,546.35 14,444.04 15,964.22 17,410.95 Long-Term Assets Property, Planet and Equipment, net 14,147.00 14,464.00 14,848.00 16,893.00 17,912.00 19,061.92 20,268.89 21,533.14 22,855.00 24,088.39 25,238.42 26,309.40 27,304.91 28,227.87 29,080.67 Intangibles, net 130.00 702.00 757.00 757.00 757.00 757.00 757.00 757.00 757.00 757.00 757.00 757.00 757.00 Goodwill 1,140.00 1,138.00 1,234.00 2,135.00 2,304.00 2,304.00 2,304.00 2,304.00 2,304.00 2,304.00 2,304.00 2,304.00 2,304.00 2,304.00 2,304.00 Total Long-TermAssets 15,884.00 16,151.00 16,675.00 20,451.00 21,645.00 22,809.92 24,031.89 25,311.14 26,648.00 27,896.39 29,061.42 30,147.40 31,157.91 32,095.87 32,963.67 Total Assets 23,505.00$ 23,476.00$ 24,634.00$ 29,281.00$ 30,556.00$ 32,260.77$ 33,860.12$ 35,916.33$ 37,548.73$ 39,650.32$ 41,778.86$ 43,693.76$ 45,601.94$ 48,060.09$ 50,374.61$ Liabilities Current Liabilities Current Portion of Long-TermDebt 588.00$ 1,315.00$ 2,734.00$ 1,657.00$ 1,885.00$ 500.00$ 300.00$ 1,050.00$ 500.00$ 500.00$ 750.00$ 1,200.00$ 500.00$ 500.00$ -$ Trade Accounts Payable 4,227 4,329 4,484 4,881 5,052 5,264 5,467 5,672 5,878 6,085 6,294 6,504 6,715 6,926 7,139 Accrued Salaries and Wages 888 1,056 1,017 1,150 1,291 1,348 1,403 1,459 1,516 1,573 1,631 1,689 1,748 1,808 1,868 Deferred Income Taxes 220 190 288 248 287 311 334 338 345 352 359 367 376 387 399 Other Current Liabilities 2,147 2,215 2,538 2,769 2,888 2,999 3,137 3,278 3,422 3,568 3,718 3,870 4,026 4,184 4,346 Total Current Liabilities 8,070 9,105 11,061 10,705 11,403 10,422 10,641 11,797 11,661 12,079 12,751 13,630 13,365 13,805 13,752 Long-Term Liabilities Long-TermDebt 7,304 6,850 6,145 9,653 9,771 9,221 8,771 8,021 7,371 7,171 6,721 5,571 5,071 5,071 5,371 Deferred Income Taxes 750 647 796 1,381 1,209 1,263 1,322 1,381 1,441 1,503 1,566 1,630 1,696 1,763 1,831 Pension and Post-Retirement Benefits 946 1,393 1,291 901 1,463 1,411 1,480 1,551 1,623 1,697 1,773 1,850 1,930 2,011 2,094 Other Long-Term Liabilities 1,137 1,515 1,127 1,246 1,268 1,268 1,268 1,268 1,268 1,268 1,268 1,268 1,268 1,268 1,268 Total Long-TermLiabilities 10137.00 10405.00 9359.00 13181.00 13711.00 13163.34 12840.43 12220.41 11703.33 11639.20 11328.05 10319.90 9964.78 10112.71 10563.72 Total Liabilities 18,207.00$ 19,510.00$ 20,420.00$ 23,886.00$ 25,114.00$ 23,585.10$ 23,481.76$ 24,017.29$ 23,364.07$ 23,718.16$ 24,079.49$ 23,950.02$ 23,329.63$ 23,918.18$ 24,315.57$ Shareowner's Equity Common Stock $959.00 $959.00 $959.00 $959.00 $959.00 $959.00 $959.00 $959.00 $959.00 $959.00 $959.00 $959.00 $959.00 $959.00 $959.00 Additional Paid-In Capital 3,394.00 3,427.00 3,451.00 3,549.00 3,707.00 5,493.61 5,743.48 5,787.59 6,575.90 6,808.37 7,034.96 7,505.64 8,420.35 8,629.07 8,831.74 Accumulated Earnings 7,675.00 7,727.00 9,034.00 10,517.00 11,555.00 13,002.05 14,454.88 15,931.44 17,428.76 18,943.79 20,484.41 22,058.10 23,671.96 25,332.84 27,047.30 Common Stock in Treasury (6,732) (8,132) (9,237) (9,641) (10,809) (10,809) (10,809) (10,809) (10,809) (10,809) (10,809) (10,809) (10,809) (10,809) (10,809) Total Shareowner's Equity -- The Kroger Co. 5,296.00 3,981.00 4,207.00 5,384.00 5,412.00 8,645.66 10,348.36 11,869.04 14,154.66 15,902.16 17,669.38 19,713.73 22,242.31 24,111.90 26,029.04 Noncontrolling Interests 2.00 -15.00 7.00 11.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 Total Equity 5,298.00$ 3,966.00$ 4,214.00$ 5,395.00$ 5,442.00$ 8,675.66$ 10,378.36$ 11,899.04$ 14,184.66$ 15,932.16$ 17,699.38$ 19,743.73$ 22,272.31$ 24,141.90$ 26,059.04$ Total Liabilities and Equity 23,505.00$ 23,476.00$ 24,634.00$ 29,281.00$ 30,556.00$ 32,260.77$ 33,860.12$ 35,916.33$ 37,548.73$ 39,650.32$ 41,778.86$ 43,693.76$ 45,601.94$ 48,060.09$ 50,374.61$ Income Statement ($ in millions) 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 2014A 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E 2023E 2024E Sales 82,049.00$ 90,269.00$ 96,619.00$ 98,375.00$ 108,465.00$ 113,818.52$ 119,057.50$ 124,404.90$ 129,861.27$ 135,427.16$ 141,103.15$ 146,889.79$ 152,787.66$ 158,797.35$ 164,919.44$ Operating Expenses: Merchandise Costs 63,803.00 71,389.00 76,726.00 78,138.00 85,512.00 89,751.03 93,901.44 98,139.08 102,464.44 106,877.99 111,380.24 115,971.69 120,652.85 125,424.24 130,286.36 Operating, General, and Adminstrative 13,823.00 15,345.00 14,849.00 15,196.00 17,161.00 18,056.77 18,938.90 19,842.81 20,768.73 21,716.89 22,687.52 23,680.85 24,697.12 25,736.56 26,799.41 Rent 623.00 619.00 628.00 613.00 707.00 696.16 680.36 660.93 637.74 610.66 579.55 544.30 504.76 460.80 412.30 Depreciation and Amortization 1,600.00 1,638.00 1,652.00 1,703.00 1,948.00 2,065.51 2,198.11 2,337.29 2,483.07 2,635.50 2,777.73 2,910.34 3,033.84 3,148.64 3,255.07 Operating Profit 2,200.00 1,278.00 2,764.00 2,725.00 3,137.00 3,249.06 3,338.68 3,424.78 3,507.28 3,586.12 3,678.11 3,782.61 3,899.09 4,027.12 4,166.31 Non-Operating Expense: Interest Expense 448.00 435.00 462.00 443.00 488.00 480.00 535.76 559.82 584.38 609.42 634.96 661.00 687.54 714.59 742.14 Earnings Before Interest and Taxes 1,752.00 843.00 2,302.00 2,282.00 2,649.00 2,769.06 2,802.93 2,864.96 2,922.91 2,976.70 3,043.14 3,121.60 3,211.55 3,312.53 3,424.17 Income TaxExpense 601.00 247.00 794.00 751.00 902.00 969.17 981.02 1,002.73 1,023.02 1,041.84 1,065.10 1,092.56 1,124.04 1,159.39 1,198.46 Net Earnings Including Non-Controlling Interest 1,151.00 596.00 1,508.00 1,531.00 1,747.00 1,799.89 1,821.90 1,862.22 1,899.89 1,934.85 1,978.04 2,029.04 2,087.51 2,153.15 2,225.71 Net Earnings (Loss) Attributable to Non-Controlling Interests 17.00 (6.00) 11.00 12.00 19.00 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 Net Earnings Attributable to Kroger Co. 1,134.00$ 602.00$ 1,497.00$ 1,519.00$ 1,728.00$ 1,789.29$ 1,811.30$ 1,851.62$ 1,889.29$ 1,924.25$ 1,967.44$ 2,018.44$ 2,076.91$ 2,142.55$ 2,215.11$
  • 22. UOIG 22 University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015 Appendix 7 – Statement of Cash Flows Appendix 8 – Acquisitions Statement of Cash Flows ($ in millions) 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 2014A 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E 2023E 2024E Cash FlowFrom Operating Activities Net Earnings including noncontrolling interests $1,133.00 $596.00 $1,508.00 $1,531.00 $1,747.00 $1,799.89 $1,821.90 $1,862.22 $1,899.89 $1,934.85 $1,978.04 $2,029.04 $2,087.51 $2,153.15 $2,225.71 Adjustments to Reconcile: Depreciation and Amortization 1,600.00 1,638.00 1,652.00 1,703.00 1,948.00 2,065.51 2,198.11 2,337.29 2,483.07 2,635.50 2,777.73 2,910.34 3,033.84 3,148.64 3,255.07 Asset Impairment Charge 25.00 37.00 18.00 39.00 37.00 - - - - - - - - - - LIFO Charge 57.00 216.00 55.00 52.00 147.00 - - - - - - - - - - Stock-Based Employee Compensation 79.00 81.00 82.00 107.00 155.00 - - - - - - - - - - Expense for Company-Sponsored Pension Plans 65.00 70.00 89.00 74.00 55.00 - - - - - - - - - - Deferred Income Taxes 37.00 31.00 176.00 72.00 73.00 - - - - - - - - - - Other 8.00 8.00 17.00 47.00 72.00 - - - - - - - - - - Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities: Store Deposits In-Transit (12.00) (120.00) (169.00) 25.00 (27.00) (70.51) (26.24) (48.72) (49.71) (50.71) (51.71) (52.72) (53.74) (54.76) (55.78) Inventories (88.00) (361.00) (78.00) (131.00) (147.00) (371.04) (280.19) (286.08) (292.00) (297.96) (303.94) (309.97) (316.02) (322.11) (328.24) Receivables (11.00) (63.00) (126.00) (8.00) (141.00) (69.96) (69.31) (71.29) (73.29) (75.32) (77.38) (79.47) (81.59) (83.73) (85.91) Prepaid and Other Current Assets 290.00 52.00 (257.00) (49.00) 2.00 (34.60) (33.86) (34.56) (35.26) (35.97) (36.68) (37.40) (38.12) (38.84) (78.67) Trade Accounts Payable 315.00 82.00 58.00 3.00 135.00 211.98 203.19 204.67 206.07 207.39 208.62 209.76 210.82 211.79 212.67 Accrued Expenses 71.00 216.00 76.00 77.00 197.00 57.18 55.22 55.88 56.54 57.19 57.82 58.44 59.05 59.64 60.23 Income Taxes Receivable/Payable 133.00 (106.00) 164.00 (47.00) (68.00) 23.56 23.13 4.08 7.47 6.98 6.48 8.01 9.45 10.84 12.17 Net Cash Providedby Operating Activities $3,366.00 $2,658.00 $2,833.00 $3,380.00 $4,163.00 $3,612.00 $3,891.94 $4,023.50 $4,202.78 $4,381.96 $4,558.97 $4,736.04 $4,911.21 $5,084.62 $5,217.26 Cash FlowFrom Investing Activities Payments for Property and Equipment, Including Lease Buyouts ($1,919.00) ($1,898.00) ($2,062.00) ($2,330.00) ($2,831.00) ($3,010.55) ($3,190.78) ($3,377.61) ($3,571.18) ($3,625.12) ($3,673.78) ($3,716.92) ($3,754.33) ($3,785.77) ($3,811.01) Payments for Acquisitions (7.00) (51.00) (122.00) (2,344.00) (252.00) (204.87) (214.30) (223.93) (233.75) (243.77) (253.99) (264.40) (275.02) (285.84) (296.85) Net Cash Usedby Investing Activities ($1,961.00) ($1,908.00) ($2,183.00) ($4,771.00) ($3,060.00) ($3,215.42) ($3,405.08) ($3,601.54) ($3,804.94) ($3,868.89) ($3,927.76) ($3,981.32) ($4,029.35) ($4,071.60) ($4,107.86) Cash FlowFrom Financing Activities Proceeds fromIssuance of Long-TermDebt $381.00 $453.00 $863.00 $3,548.00 $576.00 $450.00 $350.00 $600.00 $900.00 $800.00 $800.00 $800.00 $1,200.00 $1,000.00 $800.00 Payments on Long-TermDebt (553.00) (547.00) (1,445.00) (1,060.00) (375.00) (500.00) (500.00) (300.00) (1,050.00) (500.00) (500.00) (750.00) (1,200.00) (500.00) (500.00) Treasury Stock Purchases (545.00) (1,547.00) (1,261.00) (609.00) (1,283.00) - - - - - - - - - - Dividends Paid (250.00) (257.00) (267.00) (319.00) (338.00) (352.84) (369.08) (385.66) (402.57) (419.82) (437.42) (455.36) (473.64) (492.27) (511.25) Other -66.00 23.00 125.00 193.00 49.00 - - - - - - - - - - Net Cash Provided(Used) by Financing Activities ($1,004.00) ($1,387.00) ($600.00) $1,554.00 ($1,236.00) ($402.84) ($519.08) ($85.66) ($552.57) ($119.83) ($137.42) ($405.36) ($473.64) $7.73 ($211.25) Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents $401.00 ($637.00) $50.00 $163.00 ($133.00) ($6.26) ($32.22) $336.30 ($154.72) $393.24 $493.79 $349.36 $408.22 $1,020.74 $898.14 Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year - 825.00 188.00 238.00 401.00 268.00 261.74 229.52 565.82 411.10 804.33 1298.12 1647.48 2055.70 3076.43 Cash Equivlanets at Endof Year $188.00 $238.00 $401.00 $268.00 $261.74 $229.52 $565.82 $411.10 $804.33 $1,298.12 $1,647.48 $2,055.70 $3,076.43 $3,974.57 Acquisitions ($ in millions) 2000A 2001A 2002A 2003A 2004A 2005A 2006A 2007A 2008A 2009A 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 2014A Revenue 49,000.00 50,098.00 51,760.00 53,791.00 56,434.00 60,553.00 66,110.00 70,240.00 76,000.00 76,730.00 82,190.00 90,374.00 96,750.00 98,380.00 108,470.00 Total Assets 18,179.00 19,087.00 20,349.00 20,767.00 20,493.00 20,482.00 21,215.00 22,293.00 23,211.00 23,126.00 23,505.00 23,476.00 24,652.00 29,281.00 30,556.00 % Growth 1.87% 4.99% 6.61% 2.05% -1.32% -0.05% 3.58% 5.08% 4.12% -0.37% 1.64% -0.12% 5.01% 18.78% 4.35% Payments for Acquisitions 67 103 126 87 25 - - 90 80 36 7 51 122 2,344 252 % of Revenue 0.14% 0.21% 0.24% 0.16% 0.04% 0.00% 0.00% 0.13% 0.11% 0.05% 0.01% 0.06% 0.13% 2.38% 0.23% Goodwill, net 3,639.00 3,594.00 3,575.00 3,134.00 2,191.00 2,192.00 2,192.00 2,144.00 2,271.00 1,158.00 1,140.00 1,138.00 1,234.00 2,135.00 2,304.00 Change in Goodwill 58.00 (19.00) (441.00) (943.00) 1.00 - (48.00) 127.00 (1,113.00) (18.00) (2.00) 96.00 901.00 169.00 % of Revenue 7.43% 7.17% 6.91% 5.83% 3.88% 3.62% 3.32% 3.05% 2.99% 1.51% 1.39% 1.26% 1.28% 2.17% 2.12% % of Assets 20.02% 18.83% 17.57% 15.09% 10.69% 10.70% 10.33% 9.62% 9.78% 5.01% 4.85% 4.85% 5.01% 7.29% 7.54% Goodwill amortization 101 103 - - - - - - - - - - - - - % of Revenue 0.21% 0.21% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
  • 23. UOIG 23 University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015 Appendix 9 – Discounted Cash Flow Assumptions DiscountedFree Cash FlowAssumptions Considerations TaxRate 35.00% Terminal Growth Rate 3.00% Risk Free Rate 1.93% Terminal Value 76,745 Avg. Industry Debt / Equity 12.40% Beta 0.64 PVof Terminal Value 39,770 Avg. Industry TaxRate 34.98% Market Risk Premium 6.45% Sumof PVFree Cash Flows 12,572 Current Reinvestment Rate 41.04% % Equity 74.00% FirmValue 52,342 Reinvestment Rate in Year 2020E 47.92% % Debt 26.00% Total Debt 11,656 Implied Return on Capital in Perpetuity 6.26% Cost of Debt 4.19% Cash & Cash Equivalents 1,256 Terminal Value as a % of Total 76.0% CAPM 6.05% Market Capitalization 40,686 Implied 2015E EBITDA Multiple 9.8x WACC 5.19% Fully Diluted Shares 502 Implied Multiple in Year 2021E 5.9x Terminal Risk Free Rate 2.70% Implied Price 80.98 Free Cash Flow Growth Rate in Year 2024E 7.00% Terminal CAPM 6.82% Current Price 70.55 Terminal WACC 5.76% Undervalued 14.79% Source Implied Price Weighting Discounted Cash Flow Analysis $80.98 75% Comparable Analysis 90.93 25% Weighted Implied Price $83.47 Current Price $70.55 Undervalued 18.31%
  • 24. UOIG 24 University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015 Appendix 10 – Sensitivity Tables ImpliedPrice Undervalued/(Overvalued) Terminal Growth Rate Terminal Growth Rate 81 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% 0 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% 0.61 62.40 72.37 86.12 106.32 138.88 0.61 (11.56%) 2.57% 22.07% 50.70% 96.85% 0.63 59.99 69.32 82.06 100.52 129.64 0.63 (14.97%) (1.75%) 16.31% 42.47% 83.75% 0.65 57.71 66.45 78.27 95.19 121.37 0.65 (18.20%) (5.82%) 10.95% 34.93% 72.03% 0.67 55.54 63.74 74.74 90.29 113.93 0.67 (21.28%) (9.66%) 5.94% 27.97% 61.48% 0.69 53.48 61.18 71.43 85.76 107.19 0.69 (24.20%) (13.29%) 1.25% 21.55% 51.93% ImpliedPrice Undervalued/(Overvalued) Terminal Growth Rate Terminal Growth Rate 81 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% 0 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% 4.82% 78.46 95.44 121.74 167.98 270.63 4.82% 11.21% 35.27% 72.56% 138.10% 283.60% 5.32% 66.92 78.84 95.89 122.32 168.78 5.32% (5.15%) 11.75% 35.92% 73.39% 139.24% 5.82% 58.40 67.24 79.21 96.35 122.91 5.82% (17.23%) (4.70%) 12.28% 36.57% 74.21% 6.32% 51.85 58.67 67.56 79.59 96.81 6.32% (26.51%) (16.83%) (4.24%) 12.81% 37.22% 6.82% 46.66 52.09 58.95 67.87 79.96 6.82% (33.86%) (26.16%) (16.44%) (3.79%) 13.34% ImpliedPrice Undervalued/(Overvalued) Terminal Growth Rate Terminal Growth Rate 81 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% 0 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% 5.45% 72.45 85.39 103.99 133.02 184.67 5.45% 2.69% 21.03% 47.40% 88.55% 161.75% 5.95% 65.45 76.28 91.40 114.01 151.49 5.95% (7.23%) 8.12% 29.55% 61.60% 114.72% 6.45% 59.35 68.50 80.98 98.99 127.25 6.45% (15.88%) (2.90%) 14.79% 40.31% 80.37% 6.95% 53.97 61.79 72.22 86.83 108.78 6.95% (23.50%) (12.42%) 2.37% 23.08% 54.19% 7.45% 49.21 55.94 64.75 76.79 94.24 7.45% (30.25%) (20.71%) (8.22%) 8.85% 33.57% AdjustedBeta AdjustedBeta TerminalWACC TerminalWACC MarketRisk Premium MarketRisk Premium
  • 25. UOIG 25 University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015 Appendix 10 – Sensitivity Tables Continued ImpliedPrice Undervalued/(Overvalued) Terminal Growth Rate Terminal Growth Rate 81 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% 0 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% 25% 56.79 65.29 76.76 93.09 118.16 25% (19.51%) (7.45%) 8.81% 31.94% 67.48% 30% 58.05 66.87 78.83 95.97 122.57 30% (17.72%) (5.21%) 11.74% 36.03% 73.73% 35% 59.35 68.50 80.98 98.99 127.25 35% (15.88%) (2.90%) 14.79% 40.31% 80.37% 40% 60.68 70.19 83.22 102.16 132.24 40% (13.99%) (.51%) 17.96% 44.81% 87.44% 45% 62.06 71.94 85.55 105.50 137.55 45% (12.03%) 1.97% 21.26% 49.53% 94.97% ImpliedPrice Undervalued/(Overvalued) Terminal Growth Rate Terminal Growth Rate 81 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% 0 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% 1.70% 60.87 70.22 82.97 101.36 130.22 1.70% (13.72%) (.46%) 17.60% 43.67% 84.58% 1.80% 60.20 69.47 82.10 100.32 128.92 1.80% (14.67%) (1.53%) 16.37% 42.20% 82.74% 1.90% 59.54 68.73 81.24 99.30 127.63 1.90% (15.60%) (2.59%) 15.15% 40.75% 80.91% 2.00% 58.89 67.99 80.39 98.28 126.36 2.00% (16.53%) (3.63%) 13.94% 39.31% 79.11% 2.10% 58.24 67.26 79.54 97.27 125.10 2.10% (17.45%) (4.67%) 12.75% 37.88% 77.32% ImpliedPrice Undervalued/(Overvalued) Terminal Growth Rate Terminal Growth Rate 81 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% 0 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% 482 61.86 71.40 84.41 103.18 132.64 482 (12.32%) 1.21% 19.65% 46.25% 88.01% 492 60.60 69.95 82.69 101.08 129.94 492 (14.10%) (.85%) 17.21% 43.28% 84.19% 502 59.39 68.56 81.05 99.07 127.35 502 (15.81%) (2.82%) 14.88% 40.43% 80.52% 512 58.23 67.22 79.46 97.14 124.87 512 (17.46%) (4.72%) 12.64% 37.68% 76.99% 522 57.12 65.93 77.94 95.27 122.47 522 (19.04%) (6.55%) 10.48% 35.05% 73.60% RiskFreeRate RiskFreeRate Outstanding Shares Outstanding Shares TaxRate TaxRate
  • 26. UOIG 26 University of Oregon Investment Group May 1, 2015 Appendix 11 - Sources FactSet Federal Reserve Economic Data Financial Visualizations Website IBIS World Kroger 10-K Kroger 2013 Factbook Kroger Quarterly Reports Kroger Q1 2014 Earnings Presentation Kroger Q2 2014 Earnings Presentation Kroger Q3 2014 Earnings Presentation Kroger Q4 2014 Earnings Presentation Kroger Website Morningstar United States Census Bureau Wall Street Journal Yahoo Finance