Issues and Problems in the Philippine Basic Education
Rating Sheet
1. {Y;}EI At Rushaid construction co', Ltd.
eJErcH ii:s:+ll
"*uirr$lt tu +g'ds Jir
I. Productivity (40 points)
Sdety Performonce
Quolity of Output
Quontlty of OutPut ys. Torget
Jlmeliness or Commitment
2. Resource Management (30 points)
Plonning (schedu/e monthlylweekly work list)
Leoding (teomwork morol ond osseniveness)
O rgonizing (w ork br eokdow n s,truaure I crewing)
Controlling (.monhonng and cost)
3. Human Relations (15 points)
Teomwork, rnorol ond obiliq to interfoce with the client
4. Attendance and Punctualicy (5 points)
foomprness in odending meetings
5. Communication to Clients and Subordinates (5 points)
5. Dedication (5 points)
ET"IPLOYEE MTEE MALSI, CHARLES JR T 1019865 PROJECT: Naptha & Aromatics RP2 Mechanical
POSITION: ENGINEER 3P DEPARTMENT: PIPING A,/G
MTERJPOSITION: C.P. CAPA / CONST. MANAGER - PIPING ADJECTIVAL RATING:
, ,., ! ,*td: rEiH I --; "' i, i*-
"-f
ARP-AG-002 Rev. A I
D<HIBtT II
EN ISO 9001 :2008
BS OSHAS 18001 :2007
ASME / NBBI
(A, PP, S, R Stamp)
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE RATING
For the Period, F.om
---
o9:APIiI-1o o6-Apr-16
(ARNVAL DATE) (END OFCONT&4CrDAIE)
The performance Eyaluation Form is a tool that measures individual's past performance in a pamicular position and Promotes methods of improving
per{ormance in dre futura These shatl be dre bases for the employee's rehire $aors, promodon or upgrading, reclassification and training development
lnstruction: Superior-ratershall returndredulyaccomplishedformtoFieldAdminstaffatleastone(l)weekfromdretimethiswasreceived-
, ,.)j i,/
.-------7_-=i--
-ii+
--*
#
_ _-l_-
-------=-
e
Y.
Pi
",ll;/
I to lO poinu
I to l0 points
I to l0 points
I to I0 points
I tc I0 points
I to 5 points
I to 5 points
I to l0 points
I to 15 points
I to 5 points
I to 5 poirrs
I to 5 points
Total
Ratee's Major Accomplishments/Comments:
(use additional sheet if necessary)
P'ADI, LTA{LE> JK I
Rate{.s Evaluatien:
..:+
Recommendation for Promotion (if
Rating and Adiectiv-al Equivalent:
El Betow 75 A n-lg
(Unsaildoaory) (Average)
Rated bp C.P, CAPA Reviewed
(SUPERVISOR UP TO SUPERINTENOENT ONL'
i-iiil."-" -"-*l
Emnlavee Sigrratrrre:
i .!=
r-_lri-'-lr--:;_.1. v -_.t *.,,
f! as -sg trE ao-g+ 90- r 00
(Excqtionol)
FPS
(AVP OR VP AND GEN. MANAGER)
HRD ISSUED ELEfiRCNIC COPY
, , pery Good)
I t'r
2. Al Rushaid Gonstruction Co., Ltd.
E:g.a*"!i.*ililJ$ JL.f r*ii, Jl'ds J.iir
E{ ISO 9001 : 2008
BS OSIIAS 18001 : 2007
ASME/NBBI
(A, PP, S, RStamp)
BEHAVIORAL EVALUATIOI{ FOR PROMOTIOI{
BEHAVIOR THAT PROMOTE LEARNING RATING
A Demonstrate Positive Attitude K
B. Follows Company Rules and Regulations x
G. Respect Anthority a,a
D. Works Cooperatively in Group Situations <J Y
E. Resoives Personal Conflicts Appropriately
F. Respects Rights and Privacy of Others ,4 11
tJ. Respectful and Courteous to Others
H. Assumes ResponsibiliW ,J:)
l. Speaks at Appropriate Times ,?7
J. Follows Directions d
K. Works lndependentlv k
L. Organizes Work Space and Materials
M. Uses Tim e Constructively
N. Demonstrates Self Control e.v
o. Completes and Submii Reports Promptly t..'2q: -,1
P, Produces Safe and Qualitv Work =z 2
a. Accepis Constructive C riticis m -l-
/d f,.
Utrl-lNl I ltJN Lrf KAI lNr., ! u l;C
s
O = Outstandinq Performance (95% to 100%)
S = tt4akinq Satisfactory Progress (85% to 94%)
N = Needs lmprovement (80%to 84%)
U = Unsatisfactory Progress (75% to 79%)
l .li-' ll a: r Jdi ,"i ='
Preseni Fr-rsition
Date ofi.asi Promoiion
Recommended Position
C.P. CAPA
Rater
E"tAtgi. eHARLES -:Fi. T
ENGINEER 3P
O6-Apr-i5
. HRD ]SSUED ELECTRONIC COPY
ADMIN. FORM NO. 013 REV.AOL570 Naptha & Aromatics RP2 Mechanical Work