3. Idea behind RESET
• If the original model 𝑦 = 𝛽0 + 𝛽1 ∙ 𝑥 + 𝜖
satisfies the zero conditional mean assumption,
then nonlinear functions of the independent
variable 𝑥: 𝑦2
should be insignificant when
added to the above equation.
4. Steps of RESET
• 𝑦 = 𝛽0 + 𝛽1 ∙ 𝑥
• 𝑦 = 𝛽0 + 𝛽1 ∙ 𝑥 + 𝛿1 ∙ 𝑦2
+ 𝜖
o 𝐻0: 𝛿1 = 0 (no functional form problem)
o 𝐻1: 𝛿1 ≠ 0 (functional form problem)
5. Example of RESET Application
• Karagas (1996) assessed the relationship
between toenail arsenic concentrations and
ingestion of arsenic-containing water.
• Twenty-one participants were interviewed
regarding use of their private (unregulated)
wells for drinking and cooking, and each
provided a sample of water and toenail
clippings.
6. Example of RESET Application
• Karagas MR, Morris JS, Weiss JE, Spate V,
Baskett C, Greenberg ER. Toenail Samples as
an Indicator of Drinking Water Arsenic
Exposure. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers
and Prevention 1996;5:849-8
7. Original Model in Karagas (1996)
• log10 nails = β0 + β1 ∙ log10 water + ϵ
• The effect of a 10-fold increase in well water
concentrations of arsenic on toenail
concentrations would be 10β1 = 100.3257
=
2.12, about 2-fold increase.
8. RESET of Original Model
• log10 nails = β0 + β1 ∙ log10 water + 𝛿1 ∙ log10 𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑙𝑠
2
+ ϵ
o 𝐻0: 𝛿1 = 0 (no functional form problem)
o 𝐻1: 𝛿1 ≠ 0 (functional form problem)
• log10 𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑙𝑠 is OLS fitted values from the original regression
10. Updated Model
• log10 nails = β0 + β1 ∙ log10 water + β2 ∙ log10 𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 2 + ϵ
• The effect of a 10-fold increase in well water concentrations
of arsenic on toenail concentrations is
10β1+2∙β2∙log10 𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟
= 10β1 ∙ 102∙β2∙log10 𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟
= 10β1 ∙ 10log10 𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟2∙𝛽2
= 10β1 ∙ water2∙β2
= 100.981 ∙ water0.266
it depends on the level of Arsenic Water.
11. • At the mean value of the variable 𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 which equals to
0.0228, a 10-fold increase in well water concentrations of arsenic
will cause
100.981 ∙ 0.02280.266 = 3.5-fold
increase on toenail arsenic concentrations.
12.
13.
14. Conclusion
• There is functional form misspecification
problem in Kagras(1996).
• The model with quadratic term turned to be a
better choice.