Pain Relief in Canadian Research Management - Jean-Yves

•Download as PPTX, PDF•

1 like•194 views

Case Study Presenter: Jean-Yves Côté MBSI Bibliothécaire responsable des initiatives numériques Bibliothèque Myriam et J.-Robert Ouimet

Government & Nonprofit

USER CASE
Jean-Yves Côté, Digital Initiatives Librarian, HEC Montréal
1
CASRAI – OCTOBER 25, 2016

HEC Montréal
2
HEC Montréal
Making the Future Our Business

Key Features
• Area of interest: management, accounting, marketing, international affairs
• 250 professors / 12 departments
• 58 research units including 25 chairs
• 13 000 students from 15 countries
• International Business School Accreditations
3

What We Already Achieved: Ethics
4
Nagano Ethics
Review Management
Software
(SemiWeb)
Acquired in 2014

Our Solution Is
 Multilingual
 Compatible
 Configurable
 Customizable
6

HEC Montréal Ground Work. April 2016-April 2017
7

The Road Ahead
8
Institutional
Repository

Looking forward
to presenting
a live demo
at CASRAI 2017
jean-yves.cote@hec.ca
9

More from CASRAI

Admin Burden in Canada (ABC) Introductory Panel Discussion (CA, UK and US ove...

CASRAI

ABC Project 1 - Piloting Auto-upload of Standardized Funding Award Results - ...

CASRAI

ABC Project 2 - Launching an ORCID Consortia in Canada - Clare Appavoo & Geof...

CASRAI

Introduction to the Federal Demonstration Partnership (FDP) of the US - David...

CASRAI

Keynote: Today's Data Grow Tomorrow's Citizens - Tracey P. Lauriault

CASRAI

Canada’s Research Data Management (RDM) Ecosystem - Mark Leggott

CASRAI

Tutorial: CASRAI Standards Development (for a non-technology audience) - Davi...

CASRAI

Tutorial: the new Portage Research Data Management Planning Tool - Chuck Hump...

CASRAI

Building a Canadian National Research Data Management Framework - Mark Leggott

CASRAI

How Do I Know Thee? Let Me Count the Ways: Panel 2: Jeffrey Alexander & Patri...

CASRAI

All R&D organizations classify their research activities, either implicitly (e.g., by laboratory or department) or explicitly (e.g., by creating taxonomies to define and map research disciplines and domains). However the lack of clear standards for doing so impedes the sharing and aggregation of data on R&D activities. In this workshop, Jeff Alexander and Patrick Lambe will provide an overview of the organizational needs driving the development of a classification of R&D activities, use cases for such a classification, and the potential advantages of international coordination across such classifications. The workshop, based heavily on a study they conducted for the National Center for Science & Engineering Statistics at the U.S. National Science Foundation, will review alternate approaches to both developing R&D classifications, and streamlining the process of classifying research programs and projects. Topics to be covered include examples of international R&D classifications and their development (such as the Australia-New Zealand Standard Research Classification), design principles for R&D classifications, and new automated and semi-automated classification techniques using semantic analysis and machine learning.

Classifying R&D: Why and How Organizations Develop Taxonomies for Research Fi...

CASRAI

Classification of research plays an integral role in the functioning of research funding organizations. As such it is important to have a classification system for efficient research data collection, use, analysis and reporting. Hear about lessons learned as well as key limitations and challenges for the implementation of a standard approach to classification through the analyses of different international standards currently in use with respect to their governance, development, implementation and maintenance

How Do I Know Thee? Let Me Count the Ways: Sarah Moreault, Monica Valsangkar-...

CASRAI

Over the past 10 years, research systems have evolved from systems that focused on how to structure and record information on research, to systems capable of allowing significant insights to be derived based upon years of high quality information. In 2015, the maturity of the information now collected within many Current Research Information Systems, and the insights that this can provide is of equal or greater value than the insights that could be gleaned from established externally provided research metrics platforms alone. The ability to intersect these external and internal worlds provides new levels of strategic insight not previously available. With the addition of platforms that track altmetrics, and their ability to connect university publications data with a constant flow of real time attention level metrics, an image of a dynamic network of systems emerges, connected together by ever turning ‘cogs’ pushing and translating information. Add to this, the success of ORCID as pervasive researcher identifier infrastructure, and CASRAI as the emerging social contract for information exchange, and it becomes possible to extend this network back from the systems that track and record research information, through to the platforms through which research knowledge is created. The ‘Mechanics’ of this network of systems is more than just getting the ‘plumbing’ right. As research information moves through the network, its audience and purpose changes, the requirements for contextual metadata can also change. This presentation will explore the lived experience of Research Data Mechanics at Digital Science though illustrating how connections between Figshare, Altmetric, Symplectic Elements, and Dimensions can both enhance research system capability and reduce the burden on researchers, and research administration.

Research Metadata Mechanics - Simon Porter

CASRAI

When we say “Research Impact” many things come to mind and the reasons for why we are concerned with it vary. The underlying concepts are complex and often require expert knowledge, and there is also no one single interpretation or answer. Stakeholders are diverse and so are the means of communication. Therefore across Canada, we continue to seek more consistent and harmonized ways of telling the “Impact Story.” The panel will reflect on harmonization efforts across provinces.

Provincial Perspectives on Research Impacts: Eddy Nason, Renata Osika, Krista...

CASRAI

Lightning Reports on 2015 CASRAI Standards Work: Data Management Plan

CASRAI

Closing the Loop - Technology Implementations

CASRAI

Queen’s University is implementing an electronic tool comprising a self-serve...

CASRAI

The Canadian Clinical Trials Asset Map (CCTAM) – Signaling Canada’s clinical ...

CASRAI

Lightning Reports on 2015 CASRAI Standards Work

CASRAI

Snowball Metrics aim to become the international standard that is endorsed by research-intensive universities so that they can build and monitor the most effective strategies. It is a “bottom-up”, or sector-led, initiative in which universities themselves agree a single method to calculate metrics about their own performance so that they can compare themselves against each other in an apples-to-apples way. This enables them to benchmark and understand their strengths and weaknesses to help to decide in which areas to invest, and in which to divest.

Snowball Metrics as Standard Information Agreements - Anna Clements and Peter...

CASRAI

More from CASRAI (20)