2. Agenda
• Industry Overview/Background
• Problem Definition
• Research Objectives
• Secondary Research
• Research Design
• Objectives
• Research type/why
• Data Analysis
• Findings
• Tables/Graphs
• Conclusion/Recommendations
3. Introduction
Founded by Chip Wilson in Vancouver, Canada: 1998
REAL TIME NET WORTH. $3.6B. as of 2/25/19
Yoga-inspired athletic-apparel company for women and
men
Community space where customers can learn and
discuss healthy living, mindfulness, and living a life of
possibility
Products: pants, tops, shorts, jackets, accessories: bags,
socks, yoga mats, etc.
Premium, high quality clothing with a high pricing
strategy
Rely heavily on Word of Mouth and their high reputation
to market to consumers
Sizing up to a 14 for women
4. ProblemDefinition
Lululemon is neglecting to capture a
larger audience by not appealing to a
broader demographic of men and the
plus size industry.
5. ResearchObjectives
Establish an effective marketing
campaign towards broadening its
demographic target market
To identify, through exploratory
research,why men do or do not buy
this product
Determine if Lululemon should modify
its prices and sizes for future customers
6. SecondaryResearch-MenSide
2015-opened the first men’s store in
downtown Manhattan
Lululemon quietly rolled out its men's line at
the beginning, but lately they've been in
growing the options.
In the past five years, the segment appears
to be a game changer for the business.
Potential Billion Dollar industry, according to
Forbes Magazine, CEO Laurent Potdevin
Nike, Under Armour, Adidas dominate the
men’s segment of the market-->
https://www.businessinsider.com/lululemon
-opening-mens-stores-2013-6 - 6 reasons
why men won’t shop in Lululemon
7. SecondaryResearch-PlusSize
Average woman waist circumference - 38.6 inches as of 15’-16’
Lululemon’s largest size is a 14/XXL and is 35 inches
Plus size market value is expected to grow, on average, 1 million dollars
a year.
Statista survey
97% of women who identified as a size 14 or larger would think
positively if clothing would offer bigger sizes.
72% think that companies do not have the average American
woman in mind when creating clothing.
80% would purchase their favorite brand if offered larger sizes
8. SecondaryResearch: Revenue Potential
and IndustryTrends
• In 2016 very few people knew about Lululemon
• 6th highest generating apparel brand
• Lululemon Evaluation
• Brand Value= 3.91 Billion Annual revenue= 2.65 Billion
• Activewear represents 24% of total apparel industry sales and
is forecasted to grow through 2019
• Lululemon is expected to gain 4.08 billion in revenue in 2019
• Gain 5.17 billion by 2022
• Millennials are spending less on apparel overall, but are
willing to drop more cash on “athleisure” brands like
Lululemon, Athleta or Lorna Jane.
9. SurveyFindings:
160Responses
Sampling Used: Convenience, Non Probability method
What brands consumers typically purchase for athletic wear
(Frequencies): 89 Nike, 68 Under Armour, 52 Lululemon, 49
Adidas, 15 Puma, 9 Gymshark
Where consumers purchase athletic wear (Frequencies): 32
Online, 123 In-Store, 11 Do Not Purchase, 1 Other
Aware Lululemon sells mens clothing: 42.1% Yes, 57.9% No
51.8% disagree with the statement: I believe Lululemon is
accommodating to all body sizes
Use Athletic clothing: Exercise= 76.3%, I don't typically wear
athletic clothing= 3.1% ,Comfort Leisure=76.3%, Other= 2.5%
51.9% of consumers believe the clothing is of high quality, but
65.7% do not think it is reasonably priced
18. Managerial Recommendations
● Pursue new ways to cater to men
○ Use prominent male influencer to promote Lululemon to Men
○ Engage with male customers for more feedback
● Integrate a larger variety of size options for women over a size 14
○ Provide sizing charts to customers
○ Social Media Blast using plus size models to increase awareness
● Integrate a multitude of pricing options within their current product line
○ Looking to cater to variables such as income/age
○ Expand reach to age segments that didn’t have many respondents
19. Conclusion
Secondary Research Concludes:
Lululemons largest size is a size 14 which is 35 inches
Men’s target segment for Lululemon is a potential billion dollar industry
Primary Research Concludes:
Women would develop a positive frame of mind towards Lululemons if
they developed greater size variation in products
Men are unaware of Lululemon’s presence in the Men’s clothing industry
High prices are contributing to negative reactions to potential customers
and infrequency of purchase
Bridget---
Talk about how many respondents we had in total
Because it endorses the thought that lululemon is a female dominated brand. The fact that men chose not to respond to this survey backs this up.
Next we have our age graph. 2/3rds of respondents had an age over 30 65%, read off graph a bit
This is because we had a vast majority of older respondents that poses a higher amount of expendable income. We also surveyed for location of our respondents but found that information to be irrelevant since almost 97% of respondents were from the US and 80% of respondents live in either MA or NH, so we didn’t think these analysis would be viable for our research objectives. Income is going to come down the line again when luke talks about how cross tabulation between income/
Corresponding with
Cross-Tab Correlation: Luke
Regardless of income, everyone still thinks that Lululemon is not reasonably priced
Bridget: The chi-square value is 60.293 with a significance level of .000 which indicates that the association between how often consumers exercise and how often they shop for athletic wear is highly significant. From the bar chart, we can see that those who exercise more frequently are also more likely to shop for athletic wear more often
Slight negative correlation Alex
Not significant because .289 is greater than .05
Half of the people are aware they sell mens clothing
Alex
Not significant because .635 is greater than .05
Moderate correlation because t= .485
Bridget
57.5% of consumers are not aware that Lululemon offers mens clothing(say to support first bullet), 15% of consumers would purchase men’s clothing, although we did not have a large percentage of men taking the survey, so this number could be much higher.
Pricing options: Our data showed that consumers with higher incomes STILL believed that the pricing was too expensive. Though 41.3% believe it is of high quality.