Relationship between law and economics

1. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LAW AND ECONOMICS
Law and Economics 1
• Pre-legislative stage: In this stage economists can provide two kinds of information.
Firstly, they provide descriptive analysis of the economic condition of the country and what short of impact may
import the legislation or the policy in National Economy.
Secondly, if any legislation and policy is needed to amend or repeal, at this stage economist suggest about the effect
of that proposed policy or legislation in National Economy.
The pre-legislative stage is an important aspect of the relationship between law and economics. This stage refers to
the process of creating new legislation, before it is enacted into law. During this stage, policymakers consider the
economic impact of potential laws, and analyze how they will affect various stakeholders, including businesses,
consumers, and the government. In the pre-legislative stage, policymakers use economic analysis to determine the
costs and benefits of different policy options. They may commission studies or conduct economic modeling to assess
the likely impact of proposed legislation on the economy. This analysis can include evaluating the potential impact on
prices, employment, investment, and overall economic growth. Economic analysis in the pre-legislative stage can
also inform the design of legislation. Policymakers may use economic principles to develop policies that are efficient,
effective, and minimize unintended consequences. For example, they may consider the principles of supply and
demand to design policies that promote competition and reduce market inefficiencies. The pre-legislative stage is
also an opportunity for stakeholders to provide input and influence the design of proposed legislation. Businesses,
consumers, and interest groups may use economic arguments to advocate for their interests and suggest changes to
proposed policies. Overall, the pre-legislative stage is a critical part of the relationship between law and economics.
Economic analysis can help inform the design of legislation, evaluate its potential impact, and ensure that policies
are efficient, effective, and promote economic growth and social welfare.

2. Law and Economics
2
Example :
One example is the Foreign Investment and Technology Transfer Act (FITTA), which was introduced in 1992. The
law aimed to promote foreign investment in Nepal by creating a favorable legal environment for foreign investors.
The law provided various incentives for foreign investors, such as tax holidays and repatriation of profits.
• Another example is the Industrial Enterprises Act (IEA), which was introduced in 1992. The law aimed to
promote industrial development in Nepal by providing various incentives for industrial enterprises, such as tax
holidays and subsidies for capital investment.
These laws show the relationship between law and economics in several ways. First, they demonstrate how
legal rules and regulations can affect investment and economic growth. The introduction of laws such as FITTA
and IEA aimed to create a favorable legal environment for investment and promote economic development.
Second, these laws involve economic analysis, with policymakers considering the potential economic impact of
legal policies. The government may have conducted economic analysis to determine the appropriate incentives
to provide to foreign investors and industrial enterprises, for example.

3. Law and Economics
3
• Interpretation stage: The economic conception of justice envisages that human beings are regarded as primarily
economic agents, who act and react essentially for economic reasons, seeking as much as possible to maximize
wealth and the satisfaction of their preferences .
• The interpretation stage is another important aspect of the relationship between law and economics. This stage
refers to the process of interpreting and applying legal rules and regulations, and how they affect economic
behavior and outcomes. During the interpretation stage, courts and regulatory agencies may use economic
analysis to interpret legal rules and regulations. This analysis can help determine the intended meaning of legal
language, and how it applies to specific economic situations. Economic analysis can also help identify unintended
consequences of legal rules and regulations, and how they may affect economic behavior and outcomes. For
example, in antitrust cases, courts may use economic analysis to determine whether a company has engaged in
anti-competitive behavior, such as price-fixing or monopolization. Economic analysis can help determine whether
certain behaviors harm competition, and how they may affect prices and consumer welfare. In addition, economic
analysis can also inform the development of legal rules and regulations. Courts and regulatory agencies may use
economic principles to design policies that promote competition, innovation, and consumer welfare. For example,
regulatory agencies may use cost-benefit analysis to evaluate the economic impact of proposed regulations, and to
determine whether the benefits of a regulation outweigh its costs. Overall, the interpretation stage is a critical part
of the relationship between law and economics. Economic analysis can help courts and regulatory agencies
interpret legal rules and regulations, and design policies that promote economic growth and social welfare. By
using economic analysis in the interpretation stage, policymakers can ensure that legal rules and regulations are
efficient, effective, and achieve their intended goals.
Law is an economic tool to be utilized efficiently for the maximization of happiness. Its creation and application is
governed by economic considerations, justice than, becomes an economic standard, based on two elements of
rationality and efficiency

4. Law and Economics
4
Example:
In the context of Nepal, one example of the relationship between law and economics in the interpretation
stage is the case of Tusal vs. Nepal Rastra Bank. In this case, the Supreme Court of Nepal applied
economic principles to interpret the constitutionality of a provision in the Banking and Financial Institution
Act that required banks to maintain a certain percentage of their deposits as cash reserve with the Nepal
Rastra Bank (NRB), the central bank of Nepal.
The court applied the economic concept of "opportunity cost" to analyze the provision, arguing that
requiring banks to maintain a cash reserve with the NRB would impose an opportunity cost on the banks,
as they could earn a higher return on their funds by investing them elsewhere. The court also applied the
concept of "marginal analysis" to determine the optimal level of the cash reserve requirement, balancing
the benefits of monetary stability against the costs to the banking sector.
The court ultimately held that the cash reserve requirement was constitutional, but that it should be set at
an optimal level that balanced the benefits and costs. This case demonstrates how the application of
economic analysis can be used to interpret and enforce laws and regulations in the context of Nepal's
banking sector.

5. Law and Economics
5
Case Studies
• Microsoft Anti-Trust Case
• Affordable Care Act (ACA)
• Apple vs. Epic Games

6. MICROSOFT ANTI-TRUST CASE:
The Microsoft Anti-Trust Case was a landmark antitrust lawsuit in which the U.S. government accused
Microsoft of engaging in anti-competitive behavior. The case centered around Microsoft's dominance in
the market for personal computer operating systems, and its bundling of its Internet Explorer web
browser with its Windows operating system. The case ultimately resulted in a settlement agreement that
required Microsoft to change its business practices. This case shows the relationship between law
and economics in several ways.
 First, it demonstrates how legal rules and regulations can affect competition and innovation in the
market. The case shows how Microsoft's bundling of its web browser with its operating system could
have potentially harmed competition and innovation in the web browser market.
 Second, the case highlights the importance of economic analysis in antitrust cases. The U.S.
government used economic analysis to demonstrate how Microsoft's conduct could harm
competition and consumer welfare. Economic analysis played a key role in determining the
appropriate legal remedy in this case.
Law and Economics
6

7. AFFORDABLE CARE ACT (ACA):
• The Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare, is a federal law that was enacted in 2010.
The law aimed to increase access to health care for Americans by expanding insurance coverage and
implementing reforms in the health care industry.
• The ACA shows the relationship between law and economics in several ways. First, the law includes
provisions that have significant economic implications, such as the individual mandate, which requires
individuals to purchase health insurance or pay a penalty. The law also includes provisions that aim to
reduce health care costs, such as the creation of accountable care organizations (ACOs) and the
implementation of payment reforms.
• Second, the implementation of the ACA has been subject to legal challenges, which have highlighted
the complex relationship between law and economics. For example, challenges to the individual
mandate have focused on the economic implications of requiring individuals to purchase health
insurance.
Law and Economics
7

8. APPLE VS. EPIC GAMES:
• Apple vs. Epic Games is a high-profile legal dispute between Apple and the video game company
Epic Games. The dispute centers around Apple's App Store policies, and whether they violate
antitrust laws. Epic Games alleges that Apple has a monopoly over the App Store, and that it engages
in anti-competitive behavior by requiring developers to use Apple's payment system and charging a
30% commission on in-app purchases.
• This case shows the relationship between law and economics in several ways. First, it demonstrates
how legal rules and regulations can affect competition and innovation in the market. The case
highlights how Apple's App Store policies could potentially harm competition in the mobile app market
and limit consumer choice.
• Second, the case involves economic analysis, with both Apple and Epic Games presenting economic
evidence to support their arguments. The case also involves questions about the appropriate legal
remedy, with potential implications for the regulation of digital platforms and the mobile app market.
Law and Economics
8