Morals On Torture Essay

Morals on Torture Essay
Morals on Torture Throughout modern history, morals is questioned when torture is involved. Torture should be a black and white, yes or no question.
It is acceptable to do an immoral act, as long as the act itself is legal, to create a good outcome. In the case of Mr. Wolfgang Daschner, it does not
matter that it was uncertain whether using torture gets the required information. To threaten to use torture is the same as actually torturing, both legally
and morally. Should torture and the threat of torture be morally and legally acceptable, then in all levels involving local, state and federal systems
should be able to use torture techniques. To commit an immoral act is not the same as committing an illegal act. Actions could be legal...show more
content...
Therefore, it does not matter that the threat of torture caused the police to get the information to find the boy. To threaten to use torture is the same
as actually torturing, both legally and morally. Torture as defined under the United Nations Torture Convention of 1984 as: Any act by which severe
pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionallyinflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person
information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or
coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation
of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity. To threaten to use torture is to cause suffering
through mental intentions, therefore the threat is the same as actual performing torture. Should torture and the threat of torture be morally and legally
acceptable, then in all levels involving local, state and federal systems should be able to use torture techniques. If something is acceptable for one
legal system, then all legal systems should be able to perform the same task. If there is restrictions on which legal systems can use torture, then there
would not be any checks and
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Essay On Torture And Terror
Torture & Terror In a world where we allow torture as a tactic to extract information from supposed terrorists, we could potentially save lives of
thousands of people. In a hypothetical situation where there is a terrorist group who have planted a bomb in a densely populated area and we capture
one of the members of the group, do we not have an obligation to get the information in any means necessary? Should we not torture one terroristic
individual to save the thousands of lives of innocent American civilians? Some people would argue that we shouldn't for many reasons, including that
torture doesn't always produce information, let alone correct information. They may argue that innocent people could be tortured, and that we wouldn't
know if...show more content...
"For instance, Sheila Cassidy, a British physician, cracked under electric–shock torture by the Chilean secret service in the 1970's and identified priests
who had helped the country's socialist opposition. But her devout interrogators couldn't believe that priests would ever help the socialists, so they
tortured her for another week until they finally became convince. By that time, she was so damaged that she couldn't remember the location of the
safe house." (Book, Pg. 113) However, we could prevent this by finding ways to teach the torturers about behavioral cues. Psychologists and other
experts could help design a way for behavioral analysts to know when someone is lying to us or when they are telling the truth. This could prevent
innocent people from being tortured even more than necessary. In a case where innocent people are tortured we must realize that there's no 100%
success rate in life. Sometimes, an innocent person will be brought in and tortured, and we must find ways to resolve this. The government would
have to make amends by giving them support, emotionally, financially, and any other way necessary. The only way people would be able to sleep at
night after torturing an innocent person is because at some point, torture will help save thousands of lives for Americans. However, with correct
training we could limit these scenarios to a far lower number than they are

Argumentative Essay On Torture
While many people object to torture because of the discomfort it causes an individual, somebody could experience the same discomfort from other
occurrences (van der Rijt, 2016). As Jan–Willem van der Rijt points out in his article "Torture, Dignity, and Humiliation" for the Southern Journal of
Philosophy, in these scenarios, there is not the same "moral horror that torture instills" (van der Rijt, 2016, p. 482). The example of a woman who
makes the decision not to have an epidural is used (van der Rijt, 2016). This woman is clearly suffering, but we do not say this woman is being
tortured and her decision is not condemned like torture is (van der Rijt, 2016). Torture has existed for thousands of years, with even the Ancient Romans
...show more content...
139). However, in "Just Torture," Majima does believe torture is morally permissible in some cases, which he calls "just torture" (Majima, 2012, p.
143). The circumstances under which torture is permissible include when an individual is completely certain another person committed a crime
and when there is no other option to solve or prevent a problem (Majima, 2012). The use of torture in most situations is unequivocally wrong, but
there are certain cases where it is needed to use torture to save lives. While torture is an unpleasant concept to discuss, it is necessary at times. In
the film, no protagonist directly condemns torture, leading the viewer to infer that the characters also believe torture is sometimes necessary
(Antosca, Boal, Ellison, & Bigelow, 2012). A major part of the film is torture. One of the film's protagonists, CIA agent Dan, tortures Ammar, on
multiple occasions to obtain information (Antosca, Boal, Ellison, & Bigelow, 2012). Ammar gave money to one of the terrorists involved with 9/11
and is the individual Dan tortures primarily (Antosca, Boal, Ellison, & Bigelow, 2012). Maya takes part in the torture when she gives Dan the bucket
of water used to waterboard Ammar (Antosca, Boal, Ellison, & Bigelow, 2012). Maya witnesses torture multiple times but does nothing (Antosca,
Boal, Ellison, & Bigelow, 2012). Ammar is forced to wear a dog collar, exposed in front of Maya, and

Why Torture Should Be Avoided
Torture: Why It Should Stop
Torture, the most extreme form of human violence, resulting in both physical and psychological consequences. A technique of interrogation that has
been proven time and time again to not only be ineffective but also a waste of time. Studies have shown that not only does torture psychologically
damage the mind of the victim, but also can hurt the inflictor. If there is proof that torture is useless, why do we still use it? Torture should not be used
to get information out of prisoners because of the risk of false information, enemy resistance and utter uselessness.
Tortured prisoners give false information. One writer writes "Many survivors of torture report that they would have said anything to make the torture
Also, People who would like to "leak" information about what they know, may feel scared to do so, because of what they think might happen to them.
This is why torturing ANYONE is not effective. It complicates further operations and puts a strain on your relation. As one writer puts it "Winning the
"hearts and minds" of communities around the world is a key objective in combating violence against civilians" ("Why Torture Makes Us less Safe").
However, that relationship doesn't work when you torture civilians or people of interest because you think they know something! If people are tortured
and it is later found out that they are innocent, what type of country would we look like? Or what happens when we accidentally kill someone with
information during torture? Torture messed up our relations with other countries, and makes further operations two times harder.
Last but not least, Torture is a slow gruesome process that causes the prisoner to shut down and conjure up false memories.it is not as effective or
glamou. As a former FBI agent says torture techniques used by the Bush administration were ""ineffective, slow and unreliable" and caused the
prisoner to stop talking. ("EX–FBI Interrogator Torture "Ineffective"). Methods like sleep deprivation take almost 180 hours to complete and certain
situations that amount of time won't be available. In a "tick tock" situation, you can't afford to waste 180 hours waiting

Essay On Psychological Torture
It is illegal for American soldiers, military personnel, and other agents to inflict physical torture upon anyone. As a result, America has turned to
psychological torture, where the rules are more hazy and undefined. Unfortunately, psychological torture often will affect the victim in ways that will
last much longer than most forms of physical torture. One of these methods of psychological torture is music, and it is used to inflict pain in several
different ways. The FBI has previously used "music and other noise in order to disorient members" of the opposing side during sieges in 1993, and
also used music "in interrogation, especially in Iraq and Guantanamo Bay" during the War on Terror following 9/11 (Johnson and Cloonan, 151, 2009).
Music...show more content...
If music is played to prisoners for hours on end at volumes that are tremendously loud, it doesn't just break down their willpower. Music as torture
disorients a person so much that "the victim is reduced to an infantile state of psychic helplessness" (Lingis, 152, 2017), and "is not simply reduced to
impotence, helplessness, but to a state of ever–greater dependency on his or her torturer" (Lingis, 153, 2017). The victim is left with a total loss of
identity, and completely relies on his torturer. Despite there being no physical contact, this form of torture will greatly affect the victim
psychologically, in ways that are arguably much worse and longer lasting than nearly anything that could physically be done to them. The fact that this
form of torture is done in the name of American citizens puts a weight on American's shoulders they should not have to bear. If an American citizen
would not want to be victim to this form of torture by music, they should not have to carry the weight of this act being done to someone else. Music
as violence is more likely to leave lasting psychological problems, and thus makes it worse than physical

Essay On Medieval Torture
Torture was used as a device in order to extract confessions, prolong death, punish suspects, satisfy personal hatred, or even frighten opponents. Today,
interrogations are used in order to obtain the data needed. Interrogation is the act of questioning a suspect either formally or aggressively. The more
aggressive side of interrogations involves techniques that put the suspect under a series of distress. Medieval torture techniques influence today's
interrogations. Using the ideas from medieval torture creates a different set of techniques that can extract truthful confessions without harming the
detainee and keeping within the parameters of the legal justice system. In today's interrogations, for no permanent damage to be given, criminals are
given time restraints. There are no limitations on how many times it can be used in a sitting, however. Since the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights, the CIA found legal, humane ways to extract confessions and information from their detainees. In medieval times, torture was used to remove
criminal element in society. People respected the display of force given. The punishment matched the crime committed so every civilian knew the
consequences. Interrogation techniques are matched with the crime committed, but aren't put to the fullest...show more content...
Interrogations take place because suspects have information linking accomplices to a crime or an agenda that needs to be revealed. The reason that it
hasn't been completely replicated is the effectiveness of it is drawn into examination. Torture is able to extract confessions but it is the truth that is
needed. As previously stated, techniques are needed to be proved effective but not so that false confessions are being given by the innocent. Medieval
torture uses devices that cause physical harm because the victim are not supposed to live through

In this new day and age torture is a popular topic of controversial arguments on whether it should be permitted in certain circumstances and its
efficiency. In my paper, a logical argument against torture will be presented as well as arguments of from those who support the use of torture. In this
paper, I will ultimately defend the position against the use of torture because it not only inefficient, but it is ineffective in some cases
Main Argument:
P1: In respect to national security, we must save innocent American lives by any means at our disposal.
P2: Torture is one such means.
Conclusion: Therefore, the use of torture is justified to save lives.
Counter Argument:
Premise 1: Torture results is illegal.
Premise 2: Victims of torture will say anything to make it stop, this results in misinformation.
Premise 3: Victims of torture suffer lifelong psychological or physical problems.
Conclusion: Therefore, torture is not permissible.
Premise 1 states the lasting effects of torture. While the psychological methods of torture may not leave any apparent indication of the ordeal suffered,
they will leave emotional scars that are easily denied and more difficult to treat. Common methods of psychological torture are threats, sensory and
sleep deprivation.
In regard to physical torture, according to Ashley McCulley: It is common for torturers to use various techniques in order to prevent scarring and
evidence of torture. The after–effects that torture causes are from the repeated intrusion and attack of one's mind. (Bufacchi & Arrigo) The second
premise is proven to be strong because first–hand evidence shows that information that is gathered as a result of torture is false information or a false
confession. People will say anything to make the torturing stop if only for a little while. (As cited in Bufacchi & Arrigo) during the Vietnam War
Commander James Stockdale ordered the other American Prisoners of War to 'resist to the point of permanent injury or loss of mental faculty, and then
fall back on deceit and distortion'. Also, it has been proven that captives may produce false information without knowing that it is false. The production
of misinformation often happens when the captive is deemed "expendable"

The events that occurred on the date of September 11th will never be forgotten. Millions of Americans watched as two hijackers crashed a plane
into the World Trade Center. The towers, filled with smoke, broken glass, and debris, collapsed and killed thousands. This event left a large impact
on Americans. Many began to wonder how we could prevent such a tragedy from occurring again. After President Bush's proposal of preemptive
war, ideas of using torture for terrorists emerged. It was seen as a way to get information from terrorists quickly in order to prevent the loss of life.
However, torture is not a viable way to prevent the loss of life because it is inhumane, violates the American standard, and is ineffective. To begin with,
torture is inhumane. Michael Levin, author of Case for Torture, believes that because terrorists have "[renounced civilized standards]" (Levin 95) they
are not subject to protection under the law. However,...show more content...
The most well–known support for torture is the "ticking time bomb" scenario. The author of "Case for Torture" gives an example of this by asking the
reader to "suppose a terrorist has hidden an atomic bomb on Manhattan Island" (Levin 95) but will not "disclose where the bomb is" (95). In doing this,
the reader reflects on how effective torture would be in this specific situation. However, the argument fails to address that torture is not the only way to
gain information or more importantly, that it is the correct information. Neurologist Lawrence Hinkle, who examined Korean War veterans after
communist "brain–washing" stated that "any circumstance that impairs the function of the brain potentially affects the ability to give information and
well as the ability to withhold it" (Arrigo 547). This proves that just because torture is being used does not guarantee that the terrorists will give all
information up. They can easily create a lie or withhold the truth. Therefore, torture is

Torture Research Paper
Torture has been practised for several centuries. Whether it was the Iron maiden or waterboarding, its goal, inducing pain on a certain victim, has
stayed the same. Despite all of our social advancements, this heinous and barbaric act is continually defended and justified. Torture is a crime against
all living things and should never be practised.
Torture leaves psychological scars on the victim. These scars come when the tortured is faced with the internal realization that they are causing their
pain. This realization can force the victim to "[embrace] the faith of their captors" in exchange for better treatment (Callimichi 2). The captors could
believe in something that the victim absolutely abhors, but because he is in such a dire situation, he is willing to do whatever it takes to end his suffering
. The scars also inhibit growth and keep the victim from ever being able to move on. Even after the victim is in a safe place and away from his
tormentors, 'he will never again be at ease with the world'(VorbrГјggen and Baer 1). This paranoia will lead the tortured to live a secluded live because
the victim has had their faith in humanity shattered (VorbrГјggen and Baer 1). Unfortunately, the...show more content...
It not only inflicts damage to the tortured, but also to torturer. The torturer becomes desensitized and sees his actions as "a job" and "feels no guilt"
(Wolfendale 9). This lack of empathy is not caused by sadism, on the contrary, there is "no significant psychological difference" between a torturer
and a normal soldier (Wolfendale 4). This professional detachment is instead a barrier formed by their psyche to stop them from being broken. The
organization that tortures will also be hurt. Because of the controversial nature of torture, the government will view their operations as risky and "a
subjective process" instead of viewing it as a basis of certifiable intelligence. Based on this evidence, torture causes more harm than its potential

Essay about Is Torture Ever Acceptable?
I do not believe in torture and consider it something barbaric and inhuman. Therefore I would say that torture is never acceptable under any
circumstances, and regardless of what the consequences might be. Torture and civilization do not mix because the latter highly emphasizes the value of
human beings as it is something intrinsic. Democracy also does not mix with torture because democratic societies believe in human rights and equality.
My point is that the end does not justify the means when it comes to the torture of a human being.
September 11, 2001 was a turning point in not only the history of the United States but also the history of the world. It has put the commitment of the
civilized world with human rights into test. After...show more content...
However, there are two basic arguments about this issue I am going to talk about. The first argument considers that we can use torture as the last resort.
Consequentialists, who hold the first argument, consider that no action is bad in itself. According to them, morality of actions is determined by their
consequences. Thus, in the above mentioned scenario "the good" (saving innocent people) must be weighed up against "the bad" (torturing the suspect)
in order to make a decision on the correct course of action.
The second argument considers that torture is not acceptable under any circumstances and regardless what the consequences might be. Deontologists,
who hold this argument, consider that torture cannot be justified because the acceptance of any form of torture as an effective means to extract
information from suspects, would universalize and legalize torture. The act of torture is wrong because torturing a person for information is to use
them as a means to exploit them.
Personally, I think that the "ticking bomb" scenario is very narrow and is deceptively used to legalize torture as an acceptable means of eliciting
information from suspects in critical situations. There are several considerations that should be taken into account before trying to legalize the act of
torture; the scenario of the "ticking bomb" can be challenged and rests only on assumptions. Exceptions will pave the way before the wide
implementation

Persuasive Speech On Torture
It's a pleasant Sunday afternoon, you're enjoying a cup of coffee at your favorite little shop. Suddenly panic takes over the room, cops rush in
telling everyone to evacuate immediately. Apparently, they have been tipped of that there is a bomb planted below this coffee shop. Now, they
have the suspect in custody. He says there is more, and they could go off at any time. The police cannot get them to talk. Simply asking is getting
them nowhere. Would you use torture to get this vital information out? Or would you possibly let many people die? This is a subject that is very
hard for society to decide on. Should we use torture when it is absolutely needed, or should we stand by and let whatever is going to happen,
happen. This debate has been around for a while. Most people when they think about torture think back to the middle ages, the stuff they heard
about in books. But, this is not the barbaric age, but torture could still be useful. Like the situation I illustrated for you above, can you tell me what
you would do in that situation? I f countless lives were depending on you to get this information from this person, what would you do? Now, I
understand that this person is still a human being, and they should be treated like one. Sure, torturing a terrorist is probably not constitutional. But,
could you deal with the blood on your hands when millions of people are dead, because you couldn't get the vital information? Now, like this
example shows, torture should be used in only extreme cases. If you could save millions of lives, why would you not. Now, there are also those
who are against torture. They do not agree with it, and do not believe it should be used under any circumstances. There have been studies that show
when people are put under pressure they will answer things, But, also who is to say that another method, not using torture, would have worked?
Some people also believe that people being put in this circumstance will make them go against their morals. A great example of this is Stanley
Milgram's experiment. Stanley Milgram did an experiment to test how far people would go if they had to harm someone. Now, he put out an ad for
men to come in and be a part of this experiment. Once they were

Summary Of The Poem Torture
The poem Torture by W. Szymborska sends a powerful massage to the reader. Although the world has changed the practice of torture remains the same.
The body parts used, the tools, the injuries, the reason, and the reaction to defend it remain the same from the time of Christ to now. Humans are more
aware of it but do nothing. Torture is a constant part of human society even with the world changing throughout the centuries it remains the same. The
first stanza focuses on the human body itself. What it needs to survive and what parts are best used to conduct torture. The human body is fragile.
Knowing what will cause the most pain is vital when trying to hurt someone the first stanza makes it clear noting "a goodly of teeth and nails, its
bones are brittle, its joints extensible. In torture, this is all taken into account." (p. 46) To survive, it "must eat, breathe air, and sleep." (p. 46) All of
which are easy to take away or damage. Images of old practices come to mind. How long thick sharp needles are pushed between the fingernail and
skin. The reader cannot help feel their nails are in tacked while feeling chills. How the lack of sleep can cause the individual to lose him or herself and
be easily manipulated to give the torture what they want. The images are chilling but affective. The second stanza switches over to humanity and its
failure to change. For as long as humanity can remember torture was there along history it was there "before and after the founding of

Ethical Arguments Against Torture
Discussions concerning torture have always been controversial and upsetting. For the benefit of many, torture seems excusable and permissible when it
is guaranteed to yield vital and necessary information. Even from an act utilitarian standpoint, torture is acceptable when its actions produce the highest
happiness in numbers. But from a rule utilitarian perspective, torture violates universal truths and is not effective everywhere at all times, since it is
not always guaranteed to produce the same result. This essay will argue against torture on the basis that it is unethical no matter what the situation is or
who the suspect may be. The Oxford English Dictionary provides two main entries to define the word torture and, for the sake of the unusual
circumstances presented in the time–bomb case, the second entry will be used as a springboard for the rule utilitarian argument against torturing a
suspect and/or his child. According to the OED's second entry, the definition of torture is "To inflict severe pain or suffering upon; to torment; to
distress or afflict grievously; also, to exercise the mind severely." By examining this definition, emphasis should be placed on two main parts: 1. To
inflict severe pain or suffering upon and 2. To exercise the mind severely. We will work from these parts to break down the
The act of torture itself has the effect of a double–edged sword on the suspect and the torturer. "To exercise the mind severely" is not just a definition
limited to the suspect but encompasses all participants of the torture as well. The psychological stresses that result from this leave lasting effects on the
victim and the perpetrator and do nothing for the morale of either. It also reduces the perpetrator and his country to a primitive state of justice and
leaves an embarrassing trail of unnecessary and endless

Samantha Howe YCCC English 101 10/30/17 Essay #2 Second Draft Once Upon a Torture When one thinks of torture, what is imagined? Perhaps they
think of those wooden machines in the museums that they cannot even comprehend the use for, or the iron maiden, a cinematic favorite. Or perhaps
they don't think of anything specific like that, for it isn't a question often presented. Torture, regardless, is a gruesome term with gruesome
connotations. In our progressive society of modern technology, it is thankfully solely an issue of the past. Or... is it? It's not, we know it isn't. As a
society of the unaffected, we simply don't think about it. We are vaguely aware of the fact that torture once occurred in prevalence at some point in
time and...show more content...
There are other more macabre methods from the Bible such as in II Sam. 12:31 where prisoners had been sawn between planks and buried to their
necks, or that of II Maccabees 13:5 where Menelaus had been thrown into ashes to struggle and suffocate as he sank deeper in the soft ash; a public
display (Mannix). Judicial torture is a punishment regardless of what or why, as long as it does classify as torture. The words are occasionally
interchangeable, as every case of lawful torture is a punishment but not every punishment is necessarily torture. Historically, judicial torture has been
used for ages, albeit differing in how it is carried out today. Torture for the purpose of criminal punishment first emerged in the twelfth century in
Northern Italy when prosecution done privately by popes and royalty on criminals became prevalent and under threat when their political authority
became more centralized. During the remaining years of the Middle Ages, the process spread to much of Europe. In the late twelfth century, the
inquisitional procedure was introduced to papal legislation with the purpose of controlling those who strayed from the church. In inquisitional
procedure, the court is directly involved in investigation. This eventually extended to secular (nonreligious) crime as well. Early medieval law had
more severe criminal cases dealt with by ordeal, oath, or

Torturing has been around for ages, from ancient Egypt with their slaves up to this date. Torturing can sometimes be described as interrogation so to
disguise the harsh implications that we know as torturing. Even when it is called interrogation it does include some sort of physical and mental
infliction and damage. We know torture these days to get information from captives, especially in the war against terrorism. With all the research, I did
for this argument in this class I change my belief as against torture where I was for it in the beginning. With the research, I did it just seems as an
unreliable tool to extract information from captives because under extreme pain the human mind will say anything to make it stop no matter if it's
Also, "the prohibition against torture is well established under customary international law as jus cogens; that is, it has the highest standing in
customary law and is so fundamental as to supersede all other treaties and customary laws (except laws that are also jus cogens)" (https:/
/www.hrw.org). Premise 3 and 4 has a lot of research you can gather to support it because there is so many scientific research in it. An example is
coming from a 6,000–page study of the CIA program that was inflicted on terrorism suspects after 9/11. The study states, which was released in
December 2014, "That the agency's harsh methods failed to glean any intelligence not available through softer tactics" (google.com). Shane O'Mara,
a professor of experimental brain research at Trinity College Dublin states, "Torture can produce false information by harming those areas of the
brain associated with memory" (google.com), therefor torture is an ineffective way of gathering intel. Since torturing involves heavy inflicted pain,
this causes the person to be in a state of "do anything to get out of it". Meaning the victim will give any information valid or invalid just to have them
stop, even if it is for just for a few minutes. Premise 5 has to do with the lasting

Essay On Torture In America
This research paper talks about the controversy of torture in America. Torture is defined as a punishment of severe and intentional pain, either mentally
or physically, inflicted on a person, particularly to receive information from him or her ("Defining Torture"). Starting around 530 A.D., the Romans
started using torture as a tactic to get statements from people that they claimed they could not get any other way. For the same reason, the French and
Italians adopted using torture around the twelfth–century; however, they began to inflict torture on people because their law system required that they
must have a confession from the suspect or witnesses in order to punish the person (Green). America adopted similar practices such as the French and
Italians did, but the United States government claims that torture has only been used as a way to keep America safe from...show more content...
Their main defense is that using torture as a way of interrogation helps the government gain quick access to pertinent information that could potentially
save lives or stop future attacks in general. They believe that the Constitution does not give rights to foreign terrorists and torturing foreigners is no
different, but is actually better than the torture that other nations inflict on American people, especially prisoners of war. On the other hand, the liberals
believe that torture is ethically wrong as it deprives the rights given to non–citizens under the 14th amendment. Another reason is because America
signed UNCAT, so continuing to torture people goes against the American's word. The liberals look at torture as ineffective and cannot produce
reliable, consistent results. Stopping torture altogether will prove that the United States is better than terrorists without seeking to torture as a way of
finding results and will make the U.S. a more reliable nation for committing to their

Essay On Torture Of Prisoners
Torture of Prisoners
The way prisoners are being tortured today is still the same as it was before it has not changed one bit. Some prisoners still think about how the
guards would keep them up all night and wouldn't let them sleep by playing loud music. Other prisoners think about how the guards would surround
them with attacking dogs in a corner of the cell. There are some prisoners who have been very affected by the way the guards tortured them.
This was an issue because prisoners would sometimes die due to how cruel the guards would torture them in their cells. Also other prisoners would
commit suicide because they couldn't handle the torture any. Many people are affected with how the prisoners are being treated in the prison but the
prisoners are the ones who are most affected because they are the ones who are living the torture. The first place that began the prisoners torture was in
Guantanamo Bay when they captured a prisoner who they believed he was a terrorist. They...show more content...
Some prison public the ways they torture their prisoners because they want to show the terrorist what will happen to them if they ever get caught in
their country. There was a man named Gibson who was making a film about the ways they tortured in Christ time. When the film was released 10
days later Gibson received some pictures of people being tortured in the prison called Abu Ghraib. Looking closely at the pictures Gibson realized
that the people in the pictures were people who attended the church. Gibson film was based off of the Jews and the Romans being stripped, mocked,
scourged, and beaten also mutating the the flesh until the body is nearly unrecognizable. In the picture the prison shows the ways Abu Ghraib would
torture their prisoners one of the ways they tortured them was by stripping men and women and forcing them into a painful position. They also kept
them from sleeping for days by playing loud

Essay On Right To Torture
To torture or not to torture, is a huge controversial subject in today's society. We have seen how many are tortured throughout the world for information
and ultimately result in an undeserved death. By torturing men, women, and even children is to help find pertinent information or help stop future
attacks. Not everyone is going to see eye to eye on whether or not torture is the right thing to do to gain information. There are four theories we are to
discuss utilitarianism, Kantian duty–based ethics, virtue ethics, and Christian–principle based ethics. From a utilitarianism point of view, Holmes
explains, "The quality of consequence is really the decisive thing, not just the quantity; and in actuality the utilitarian wants to maximize
consequences of a certain kind, good consequences rather than bad" (Holmes, pg. 44). From the perspective of a utilitarian they would look into
the form of torture and see if it was good or right. For example if a child was abducted and the kidnapper was captured and there was a chance of the
child being alive, torturing them to talk can help investigators find the child alive. If the kidnapper gives up the location of the child and he or she is
still alive, the kidnapper would end up with...show more content...
62). Kant goes on to say, "always treat persons as ends and not just as means" (Holmes, pg. 63). Kant believes value under certain conditions may be
used for either good or evil. Saying good will is essentially good. Virtue ethics focuses "moral decision making" (Holmes, pg. 133). A virtue ethicist
looks at the moral character of the person and their actions. Even though a prisoner may have information that is valuable, a person with moral ethics
would not torture the prisoner because of their moral obligations. Therefore, the person torturing the prisoner will have self–control, courage and
wisdom and are more humane within their

Essay on Medieval Torture
Torture (Latin torquere, "to twist"), in law, infliction of severe bodily pain either as punishment, or to compel a person to confess to a crime, or to give
evidence in a judicial proceeding. Among primitive peoples, torture has been used as a means of ordeal and to punish captured enemies. Examination
by torture, often called the "question," has been used in many countries as a judicial method. It involves using instruments to extort evidence from
unwilling witnesses.
In ancient Athens, slaves were always examined by torture, and for this reason their evidence was apparently considered more valuable than that of
freemen. A free Athenian could not be examined by this method, but torture may have been used occasionally in executing...show more content...
It was last used in England in 1640 to compel a confession of treason. By the middle of the 18th century legal torture was abolished in France, Prussia,
Saxony (Sachsen), Austria, and Switzerland. Under a papal bull issued in 1816 the use of torture was banned in Roman Catholic countries.
Torture in Europe through the Ages
The history of torture in Europe may seem at first to be a steady progression of barbarous tactics, leading from one social purge to the next, but this is
not completely the case. Torture has been used in a progression from primitive methods to the present more modern styles. It has also developed
extensively, both in severity and variety of methods used. But in the end, torture has gone full circle; modern forms of torture are more like those
methods used by savages than anything in between. Overall, the severity of torture has fluctuated, growing and receding with the passing of each new
time period, but eventually reverting to its original state.
There are several varieties of tortures in general. Until the twentieth century, most forms of torture that were recognized as such were purely physical in
nature. The breaking of bones, manipulation or mutilation of a person's body, and the application of flames or other implements of punishment were
the main forms of recognized torture.
The Wheel was a

Morals On Torture Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Morals On Torture Essay