SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 5
Download to read offline
HE demographic patterns of craniopharyngioma are
not well described because the tumor is rare. In
addition, most cancer registries collect data only on
malignant conditions and, therefore, they are not useful
in the study of craniopharyngioma, considered to be of
borderline histological malignancy. The objective of this
report is to describe the epidemiology of craniopharyn-
gioma. Incidence rates by gender, age, and race were cal-
culated from three population-based cancer registries that
include data on brain tumors of benign and borderline
malignancy. Survival rates were estimated from a pedi-
atric population-based tumor registry and a hospital-based
registry.
Data Collection Methods
Tumor Incidence
Data on the incidence of craniopharyngioma were
available from three population-based registries: the
Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States
(CBTRUS), Greater Delaware Valley Pediatric Tumor
Registry (GDVPTR), and the University of Southern Cali-
fornia/Los Angeles County Cancer Surveillance Program
(CSP).
CBTRUS. The CBTRUS obtained data for the years
1990 to 1993 from 10 state cancer registries that catalog
benign and malignant primary brain tumors: Arizona,
Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Idaho, Maine, Minne-
sota, Montana, North Carolina, and Utah, a population
totaling 26.8 million people.6
These registries are popula-
tion based and reporting is required by law. The popula-
tion data for each state were obtained from the Web site
of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results pro-
gram, which receives yearly population estimates from the
U.S. Bureau of the Census. For the analyses reported here,
all diagnoses of craniopharyngioma (International Clas-
sification for Diseases of Oncology code 935011
) were
included.
GDVPTR. The GDVPTR is a population-based registry
of pediatric cancer that covers a 31-county region in the
eastern U.S. consisting of eastern Pennsylvania, southern
New Jersey, Delaware, and one northern Maryland coun-
ty.9
Approximately 1.8 million children under the age of
15 years live in the region. Incidents of cancers are regis-
J. Neurosurg. / Volume 89 / October, 1998
J Neurosurg 89:547–551, 1998
The descriptive epidemiology of craniopharyngioma
GRETA R. BUNIN, PH.D., TANYA S. SURAWICZ, M.P.H., PHILIP A. WITMAN, M.P.H., M.PHIL.,
SUSAN PRESTON-MARTIN, PH.D., FAITH DAVIS, PH.D., AND JANET M. BRUNER, M.D.
Division of Oncology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of
Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States, Division of
Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois;
Division of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale
University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; University of Southern California, Norris
Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California; and Department of Pathology, University of Texas, M.D.
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Object. In this report the authors describe the epidemiology of craniopharyngioma.
Methods. The incidence of craniopharyngioma in the United States was estimated from two population-based
cancer registries that include brain tumors of benign and borderline malignancy: the Central Brain Tumor Registry
of the United States (CBTRUS) and the Los Angeles county Cancer Surveillance Program. Information on addi-
tional pediatric tumors was available from the Greater Delaware Valley Pediatric Tumor Registry (GDVPTR). The
overall incidence of craniopharyngioma was 0.13 per 100,000 person years and did not vary by gender or race. A
bimodal distribution by age was noted with peak incidence rates in children (aged 5–14 years) and among older
adults (aged 65–74 years in CBTRUS and 50–74 years in Los Angeles county). Survival information was available
from GDVPTR and the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), a hospital-based reporting system. In the NCDB, the
5-year survival rate was 80% and decreased with older age at diagnosis. Survival is higher among children and has
improved in recent years.
Conclusions. Craniopharyngioma is a rare brain tumor of uncertain behavior that occurs at a rate of 1.3 per mil-
lion person years. Approximately 338 cases of this disease are expected to occur annually in the United States, with
96 occurring in children from 0 to 14 years of age.
KEY WORDS • craniopharyngioma • incidence • survival
T
547
tered if diagnosed on or after January 1, 1970, in a child
younger than 15 years, and who resided in the region at
the time of diagnosis. For the period 1970 to 1989, cases
were ascertained from all the major medical centers in the
region and several centers outside the region that treated
children with cancer. In addition, nearly all the other hos-
pitals in the region that care for children reported cases.
Although the GDVPTR relied on voluntary, mostly pas-
sive reporting, the incidence rates reported for this period
are similar to other U.S. rates, such as those from the Sur-
veillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program.3,9,20
Only malignant neoplasms are generally registered, but
benign and borderline brain tumors were ascertained for
the period of 1970 to 1989 as part of a special project.
CSP. The University of Southern California/Los Ange-
les County CSP has collected reports on all new intracra-
nial neoplasms diagnosed in the county population of
almost 10 million people since 1972.8
Inclusion criteria
have been consistent, and reporting of both benign and
malignant tumors has been at least 95% complete since
the beginning. Data were collected on 228 Los Angeles
County residents with craniopharyngioma first diagnosed
between 1972 and 1995. Specially trained CSP personnel
abstracted information from hospital charts on age, gen-
der, race, address, religion, birthplace, occupation, and in-
dustry, as well as details of the pathological diagnosis.
Age-adjusted incidence rates were calculated by the direct
method and standardized to the U.S. 1970 population.
Survival Data
Data were available from the GDVPTR and the Na-
tional Cancer Data Base (NCDB).
NCDB. The NCDB, a joint project of the Commission
on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons, requests
data from hospitals in the U.S. with cancer registries. For
the periods 1985 to 1988 and 1990 to 1992, data were
available on intracranial tumors, including those in the
pituitary, which were voluntarily electronically submitted
to the NCDB from approximately 1000 hospitals. Of
68,042 records, 1064 were identified by the NCDB as
duplicates and deleted. In addition, 3726 records were de-
leted because of invalid or illogical data. The remaining
63,252 records included 285 craniopharyngiomas, which
are analyzed here.
GDVPTR. Survival estimates from the GDVPTR were
generated with an SAS15
software package using the Kap-
lan–Meier method. Observed survival rates were obtained
from product-limit estimates of entire curves and were not
adjusted for deaths due to other causes.
Results
Tumor Incidence
In the 4-year period of 1990 to 1993, 135 craniopharyn-
giomas were diagnosed in the geographic areas of the
CBTRUS. The incidence in males and females was near-
ly identical: 0.13 and 0.12 per 100,000 per year, respec-
tively (Table 1). No racial difference in incidence was
apparent, with a rate of 0.12 in Caucasians and 0.13 in
African Americans.
Incidence seemed to vary with patient age, being some-
what higher in patients aged 5 to 14 years than in any
other age group except those aged 65 to 74 years (Fig. 1).
In late adolescence and early adulthood (ages 15–34
years), incidence was the lowest. Starting at age 35 years,
incidence appeared fairly constant except for a higher rate
in patients aged 65 to 74 years and the absence of any
cases after the age of 84 years. Given the small numbers
of craniopharyngiomas in any age group, the observed dif-
ferences could have occurred by chance.
In Los Angeles county, 228 craniopharyngiomas were
diagnosed between 1972 and 1995. The incidence rates by
gender (0.13 in males and 0.11 in females) are compara-
ble to those ascertained by CBTRUS (Table 1), and no
racial differences were noted. Higher rates were noted
among children (aged 5–14 years) and older adults (aged
50–74 years) (Fig. 2). The lowest incidence occurred
among those aged 15 to 34 years.
In the GDVPTR area, 67 craniopharyngiomas were
diagnosed in children aged 0 to 14 years between 1970
and 1989, giving an incidence rate of 0.18 per 100,000 per
G. R. Bunin, et al.
548 J. Neurosurg. / Volume 89 / October, 1998
TABLE 1
Average annual incidence rates of craniopharyngioma by gender,
race, and registry*
No. of Incidence
Registry & Variable Tumors Rate
CBTRUS, 1990–1993
total 135 0.13
male 68 0.13
female 67 0.12
Caucasians 109 0.12
African Americans 11 0.13
Los Angeles County, 1972–1995
total 228 0.12
male 121 0.13
female 107 0.11
Caucasian males 63 0.14
African American males 12 0.12
Caucasian females 61 0.12
African American females 12 0.11
* Rates are per 100,000 person years and age-adjusted using the 1970
U.S. standard population.
FIG. 1. Graph showing the age-specific incidence of cranio-
pharyngioma derived from the CBTRUS data.
year, a rate similar to children in Los Angeles county and
the CBTRUS areas (Table 2). The incidence in children in
the GDVPTR regions did not differ by gender but was
significantly higher in African Americans compared with
Caucasians. No craniopharyngiomas occurred in children
who were neither Caucasian or African American; two
tumors would have been expected if children of other
races experienced the same incidence as the population as
a whole.
Survival Rates
The NCDB included data on 285 patients with cranio-
pharyngioma, 35 of whom died. Survival percentage was
estimated to be 86% at 2 years and 80% at 5 years postdi-
agnosis. Survival varied notably by age group, with excel-
lent survival for patients younger than 20 years of age
and poor survival for those older than 65 years of age
(Table 3).
In the population-based GDVPTR, children with cra-
niopharyngioma had a 5-year survival rate of 83%, which
was lower than that for children in the NCDB data. The
NCDB data are from the late 1980s and early 1990s
whereas the GDVPTR data include a time period begin-
ning in 1970. The most recent time period in the GDVP-
TR data, 1985 to 1989, is similar to the period of NCDB
data. For patients diagnosed with craniopharyngioma in
1985 to 1989 in the GDVPTR region, 5-year survival is
94% based on 16 patients and one death compared to 99%
in the NCDB data with 72 patients and two deaths.
Discussion
The overall incidence of craniopharyngioma observed
in the CBTRUS and Los Angeles county data is similar to
that seen in other populations. Stiller and Nectoux19
re-
ported a similar rate in U.S. data combined from several
areas that do not overlap with the states that contributed to
the CBTRUS data. The incidence in Rochester, Minne-
sota, was higher (0.3) but was based on only six tumors.12
In the present study, virtually identical incidence rates
were seen in Caucasians and African Americans. Sim-
ilarly, in the U.S. data collected by Stiller and Nectoux,19
the rates were 0.07 for Caucasians and 0.10 for African
Americans, an insignificant difference. In the GDVPTR
data, the rate in African-American children appeared to be
approximately twice that in Caucasian children, a statisti-
cally significant difference. However, in the CBTRUS and
Los Angeles county data, African-American and Cau-
casian children experienced similar rates. The discrepant
incidence rates might have occurred by chance, given the
small number of African-American cases (four in the
CBTRUS data, five in Los Angeles county, and 20 in
the GDVPTR data). A geographic difference in the inci-
dence rates in African Americans is also a possible expla-
nation.
We did not observe any differences in incidence be-
tween males and females overall. There was also no gen-
der difference in a population-based study in Finland.17
However, in a large hospital-based series of cases from the
United Kingdom, there were 107 males and 66 females, a
ratio of 1.3.13
In case series of craniopharyngiomas in chil-
dren, the male/female ratios were 0.9 based on 42 tumors7
and 1.6 based on 105 tumors.18
Although in Los Angeles
county tumor rates were higher in boys than girls, there
was no evidence of a gender difference among children
in the CBTRUS or GDVPTR data. Considering all the
data, craniopharyngioma may occur slightly more often
in boys.
J. Neurosurg. / Volume 89 / October, 1998
Epidemiology of craniopharyngioma
549
FIG. 2. Graph showing the age-specific incidence of cranio-
pharyngioma derived from the University of Southern Califor-
nia/Los Angeles county CSP data for the years 1972–1995.
TABLE 2
Average annual incidence rates in children with craniopharyngioma, categorized by gender*
Age CBTRUS GDVPTR Los Angeles County
Group
(yrs) Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total
0–4 0.09 (4) 0.15 (6) 0.12 (10) 0.12 (7) 0.14 (8) 0.13 (15) 0.12 (10) 0.05 (4) 0.09 (14)
5–9 0.19 (8) 0.20 (8) 0.20 (16) 0.30 (19) 0.24 (15) 0.27 (34) 0.23 (17) 0.10 (7) 0.16 (24)
10–14 0.17 (7) 0.18 (7) 0.17 (14) 0.13 (9) 0.14 (9) 0.13 (18) 0.18 (13) 0.16 (11) 0.17 (24)
* Number of tumors is presented in parentheses.
TABLE 3
National Cancer Data Base 5-year survival rates in patients with
craniopharyngioma by age at diagnosis
Age at No. of No. of Survival
Diagnosis Patients Deaths Rate 95% CI*
,20 82 2 0.99 0.96–1.0
20–64 168 21 0.80 0.71–0.88
$65 35 12 0.38 0.08–0.67
* CI = confidence interval.
These data indicate that a smaller proportion of all cra-
niopharyngiomas occur in childhood. Roughly one-third
of the patients in our study were younger than 20 years of
age at the time of diagnosis (35% in CBTRUS, 33% in
Los Angeles county); the proportion younger than 15
years of age was only 30% and 27%, respectively. In pre-
vious studies it has been reported that 50% of cranio-
pharyngiomas occurred in children.2,16
A bimodal age distribution of incidence rates is appar-
ent in the CBTRUS and Los Angeles county data. Al-
though the numbers of cases in each age category are lim-
ited, the pattern is consistent in both populations with
larger peaks noted in older adults (Figs. 1 and 2). Whereas
increasing mortality rates from all brain tumors among the
elderly have been correlated with increased use of diag-
nostic procedures, especially among people 65 years of
age and older covered by Medicare,10
the increased inci-
dence among adults in Los Angeles county occurs be-
tween the ages of 50 and 74 years and is not likely due to
a diagnostic bias in the elderly. A bimodal distribution has
been suggested and different histologies noted in younger
and older patients in large clinical series: adamantinous
tumors are more common in children and squamous pap-
illary tumors are more common in adults.4,5,14
These data
indicate that there may be two distinct etiologies for the
younger and the older patients. Craniopharyngiomas are
coded under a single morphology code in the International
Classification for Diseases of Oncology; therefore, it is
not possible to distinguish these subtypes in our data.
Craniopharyngioma is believed to develop from rests of
embryonal cells in the pituitary. Two hypotheses have
been proposed: the first relates to the development of the
adenohypophysis during embryogenesis, which is consis-
tent with pediatric tumor development; the second pro-
poses that residual squamous epithelium from the ade-
nohypophysis undergoes metaplasia, which explains the
adult tumors.14
A consensus on this has not been achieved.
It may be of value to note the age distribution of other
tumors believed to develop from embryonal cells, such as
neuroblastoma and medulloblastoma. Although approxi-
mately one-third of all craniopharyngiomas occur in chil-
dren, the percentage of embryonal childhood tumors
ranges from 75 to virtually 100%.
There is some suggestion of international variation in
the incidence of these tumors, which is often taken to indi-
cate an environmental etiology. For example, Stiller and
Nectoux19
have reported that the proportion of cranio-
pharyngioma among central nervous system tumors var-
ied substantially; the percentages were 1.5% in Australia,
4.7 to 7.9% in Europe, 3.9% in Japan, 2.7% in U.S. Cau-
casians, 4.9% in U.S. African Americans, and 11.6% in
Africa. In the CBTRUS craniopharyngiomas comprised
4.2% of the tumors reported in children 0 to 14 years of
age. Because it is likely that not all brain tumors are diag-
nosed in developing countries, examination of incidence
rates will lead to an exaggerated estimate of international
variation. Percentages are useful in comparing interna-
tional rates because they will be less influenced by incom-
plete reporting. However, percentages are influenced by
the proportions of other types of tumors, including those
with nonspecific diagnosis such as brain tumor or malig-
nant brain tumor. Although the international comparison
indicates that craniopharyngioma occurs more frequently
in Africa and less frequently in Australia, conclusions are
not possible.
In the NCDB data, the survival rate at 5 years was 80%
overall, with survival much better among children than the
elderly. Observed survival is expected to be lower in the
elderly, as our survival estimates were not adjusted for
death due to other causes. Reports on survival in the liter-
ature are difficult to interpret because some are based on
patients who received treatment and, therefore, had to sur-
vive long enough to do so. To our knowledge, the only
population-based report of survival after diagnosis of
craniopharyngioma is an analysis of data from the Finnish
Cancer Registry for patients diagnosed from 1951 to
1982.17
The overall 5-year survival rate was 69%; 73% for
patients diagnosed in the 1970s. Neurosurgical techniques
and the introduction of computerized tomography scan-
ning have led to lower surgical mortality rates and more
complete resections and, therefore, improved survival.
The survival rate in the NCDB data for patients diagnosed
from 1985 to 1992 was slightly higher than in the report
from Finland. The NCDB is hospital based but does
include all patients diagnosed at the participating hospi-
tals, regardless of treatment.
Conclusions
In summary, craniopharyngioma is a rare brain tumor of
uncertain behavior that occurs at a rate of 1.3 per million
person years. Incidence rates are similar in males and
females and between Caucasians and African Americans.
Tumors are more common among children (aged 5 to 14
years) and older adults (aged 65 to 74 years in CBTRUS
and 50 to 74 years in Los Angeles county); the lowest
rates occur among those aged 15 to 34 years. Survival is
highest for patients diagnosed at a younger age and has
improved for children diagnosed since the mid-1980s.
Based on the rates reported here, 338 cases are expected
to occur annually in the U.S. with 96 occurring in children
0 to 14 years of age (estimated for 1996).
Acknowledgments
The registries and participants who provide data to CBTRUS
include: Arizona Cancer Registry, Ms. Georgia Yee; Colorado
Central Cancer Registry, Ms. Robin Bott; Connecticut Tumor
Registry, Mr. John Flannery; Delaware State Tumor Registry, Ms.
Carol Marker; Cancer Data Registry of Idaho, Ms. Stacey Carson;
Maine Cancer Registry, Ms. Melanie Lanctot; Massachusetts
Cancer Registry, Dr. Susan Gershman; Minnesota Cancer Surveil-
lance System, Dr. Sally Bushhouse; Missouri Cancer Registry, Dr.
Jian Chang; Montana Central Tumor Registry, Ms. Debbi Hellhake;
North Carolina Central Cancer Registry, Dr. Rebecca Martin; and
Utah Cancer Registry, Ms. Rosemary Dibble and Dr. Janet
Stanford.
The authors thank the NCDB Data Request Committee and Mr.
Herman Menck of the American College of Surgeons for providing
the NCDB data. We also thank Dr. Wendy Cozen for facilitating
our data request.
References
1. Armitage P, Berry G: Statistical Methods in Medical
Research, ed 2. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 1987
2. Barrow DL, Tindall GT: Tumors of the pituitary gland, in
Morantz RA, Walsh JW (eds): Brain Tumors: A Compre-
hensive Text. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1994, pp 367–386
G. R. Bunin, et al.
550 J. Neurosurg. / Volume 89 / October, 1998
3. Bunin GR, Feuer EJ, Witman PA, et al: Increasing incidence of
childhood cancer: report of 20 years’ experience from the
Greater Delaware Valley Pediatric Tumor Registry. Paediatr
Perinat Epidemiol 10:319–338, 1996
4. Burger PC, Scheithauer BW, Vogel FS: Surgical Pathology of
the Nervous System and its Coverings, ed 3. New York:
Churchill Livingstone, 1991
5. Carmel PW: Brain tumors of disordered embryogenesis, in
Youmans JR (ed): Neurological Surgery: A Comprehensive
Reference Guide to the Diagnosis and Management of Neu-
rosurgical Problems, ed 3. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1990,
Vol 5, pp 3223–3249
6. CBTRUS: 1996 Annual Report. Chicago: Central Brain Tu-
mor Registry of the United States, 1997
7. Farwell JR, Dohrmann GJ, Flannery JT: Central nervous system
tumors in children. Cancer 40:3123–3132, 1977
8. Hisserich JC, Martin SP, Henderson BE: An areawide cancer
reporting network. Publ Hlth Rep 90:15–17, 1975
9. Kramer S, Meadows AT, Jarrett P, et al: Incidence of childhood
cancer: experience of a decade in a population-based registry. J
Natl Cancer Inst 70:49–55, 1983
10. Modan B, Wagener DK, Feldman JJ, et al: Increased mortality
from brain tumors: a combined outcome of diagnostic technol-
ogy and change of attitude toward the elderly. Am J Epidemiol
135:1349–1357, 1992
11. Percy C, Van Holten V, Muir C (eds): ICD-O International
Classification of Diseases for Oncology, ed 2. Geneva: World
Health Organization, 1990
12. Radhakrishnan K, Mokri B, Parisi JE, et al: The trends in inci-
dence of primary brain tumors in the population of Rochester,
Minnesota. Ann Neurol 37:67–73, 1995
13. Rajan B, Ashley S, Gorman C, et al: Craniopharyngioma—
long-term results following limited surgery and radiotherapy.
Radiother Oncol 26:1–10, 1993
14. Samii M, Tatagiba M: Craniopharyngioma, in Kaye AH, Laws
ER Jr (eds): Brain Tumors: An Encyclopedic Approach.
New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1995, pp 873–894
15. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 6, ed 4. Cary, NC: SAS
Institute, Vols 1, 2, 1988
16. Scott RM, Pomeroy SL, Tarbell NJ: Craniopharyngioma, in
Black PM, Loeffler JS (eds): Cancer of the Nervous System.
Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Science, 1997, pp 414–422
17. Sorva R, Heiskanen O: Craniopharyngioma in Finland. A study
of 123 cases. Acta Neurochir 81:85–89, 1986
18. Stewart AM, Lennox EL, Sanders BM: Group characteristics of
children with cerebral and spinal cord tumours. Br J Cancer
28:568–574, 1973
19. Stiller CA, Nectoux J: International incidence of childhood
brain and spinal tumors. Int J Epidemiol 23:458–464, 1994
20. Young JL, Miller RW: Incidence of malignant tumors in U.S.
children. J Pediatr 86:254–258, 1975
Manuscript received October 13, 1997.
Accepted in final form May 29, 1998.
This work was conducted under contract to the Central Brain
Tumor Registry of the United States and supported by the Pediatric
Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States through the Ride for
Kids Fundraising Program, sponsored by the American Honda
Motor Company, Motorcycle Division.
Cancer incidence data for Los Angeles County were collected
with support from grant CA17054 and contract N01-CN-25403
from the National Institutes of Health and subcontracts 050(C-L)-
8709 from the California Department of Health Services as part of
its statewide cancer reporting system.
Address reprint requests to: Tanya S. Surawicz, M.P.H., Central
Brain Tumor Registry of the United States, Division of Epi-
demiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of
Illinois, 2121 West Taylor Street, Chicago, Illinois 60612. email:
surawicz@uic.edu.
J. Neurosurg. / Volume 89 / October, 1998
Epidemiology of craniopharyngioma
551

More Related Content

Similar to THE DESCRIPTIVE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF CRANIOPHARYNGIOMA 1998.pdf

Women's Access to Healthcare - GRU Cancer Center Presentation
Women's Access to Healthcare - GRU Cancer Center PresentationWomen's Access to Healthcare - GRU Cancer Center Presentation
Women's Access to Healthcare - GRU Cancer Center PresentationGeorgia Commission on Women
 
long-term colorrectal-cancer mortality after adenoma removal
long-term colorrectal-cancer mortality after adenoma removallong-term colorrectal-cancer mortality after adenoma removal
long-term colorrectal-cancer mortality after adenoma removalPascual Marrero
 
Epidemiology of cancer in patients seeking palliative care by l.w. cushny
Epidemiology of cancer in patients seeking palliative care by l.w. cushnyEpidemiology of cancer in patients seeking palliative care by l.w. cushny
Epidemiology of cancer in patients seeking palliative care by l.w. cushnyKesho Conference
 
conference.2016.LCMN-Melanoma
conference.2016.LCMN-Melanomaconference.2016.LCMN-Melanoma
conference.2016.LCMN-MelanomaPaul Coleman
 
A new research paper published by Dr. Suheil Simaan and Dr. Feras Al Jerf
A new research paper published by Dr. Suheil Simaan and Dr. Feras Al JerfA new research paper published by Dr. Suheil Simaan and Dr. Feras Al Jerf
A new research paper published by Dr. Suheil Simaan and Dr. Feras Al JerfCancer Care Specilties
 
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer,Part I .docx
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer,Part I .docxAnnual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer,Part I .docx
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer,Part I .docxjack60216
 
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer,Part I .docx
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer,Part I .docxAnnual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer,Part I .docx
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer,Part I .docxrossskuddershamus
 
ORIGINAL PAPERRisk of colorectal cancer among long-term ce.docx
ORIGINAL PAPERRisk of colorectal cancer among long-term ce.docxORIGINAL PAPERRisk of colorectal cancer among long-term ce.docx
ORIGINAL PAPERRisk of colorectal cancer among long-term ce.docxalfred4lewis58146
 
Understanding Lynch Syndrome
Understanding Lynch SyndromeUnderstanding Lynch Syndrome
Understanding Lynch Syndromebkling
 
Transition from film to digital mammography
Transition from film to digital mammographyTransition from film to digital mammography
Transition from film to digital mammographyLisanne van Lier
 
Incidencia internal de cancer
Incidencia internal de cancerIncidencia internal de cancer
Incidencia internal de cancerRaúl Cast S
 
CA A Cancer J Clinicians - 2021 - Siegel - Cancer Statistics 2021.pdf
CA A Cancer J Clinicians - 2021 - Siegel - Cancer Statistics 2021.pdfCA A Cancer J Clinicians - 2021 - Siegel - Cancer Statistics 2021.pdf
CA A Cancer J Clinicians - 2021 - Siegel - Cancer Statistics 2021.pdfpayecat828
 
Clinical-Pathological Analysis of 37 Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas in Tucumán...
Clinical-Pathological Analysis of 37 Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas in Tucumán...Clinical-Pathological Analysis of 37 Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas in Tucumán...
Clinical-Pathological Analysis of 37 Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas in Tucumán...semualkaira
 
Clinical-Pathological Analysis of 37 Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas in Tucumán...
Clinical-Pathological Analysis of 37 Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas in Tucumán...Clinical-Pathological Analysis of 37 Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas in Tucumán...
Clinical-Pathological Analysis of 37 Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas in Tucumán...semualkaira
 
Cancer incidence in Malawi: Time trends in Blantyre 1996-2005 and predictions...
Cancer incidence in Malawi: Time trends in Blantyre 1996-2005 and predictions...Cancer incidence in Malawi: Time trends in Blantyre 1996-2005 and predictions...
Cancer incidence in Malawi: Time trends in Blantyre 1996-2005 and predictions...Humphrey Misiri
 

Similar to THE DESCRIPTIVE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF CRANIOPHARYNGIOMA 1998.pdf (20)

Anal Cytology and Anal Cancer Screening in HIV Patients
Anal Cytology and Anal Cancer Screening in HIV PatientsAnal Cytology and Anal Cancer Screening in HIV Patients
Anal Cytology and Anal Cancer Screening in HIV Patients
 
Women's Access to Healthcare - GRU Cancer Center Presentation
Women's Access to Healthcare - GRU Cancer Center PresentationWomen's Access to Healthcare - GRU Cancer Center Presentation
Women's Access to Healthcare - GRU Cancer Center Presentation
 
long-term colorrectal-cancer mortality after adenoma removal
long-term colorrectal-cancer mortality after adenoma removallong-term colorrectal-cancer mortality after adenoma removal
long-term colorrectal-cancer mortality after adenoma removal
 
Epidemiology of cancer in patients seeking palliative care by l.w. cushny
Epidemiology of cancer in patients seeking palliative care by l.w. cushnyEpidemiology of cancer in patients seeking palliative care by l.w. cushny
Epidemiology of cancer in patients seeking palliative care by l.w. cushny
 
conference.2016.LCMN-Melanoma
conference.2016.LCMN-Melanomaconference.2016.LCMN-Melanoma
conference.2016.LCMN-Melanoma
 
A new research paper published by Dr. Suheil Simaan and Dr. Feras Al Jerf
A new research paper published by Dr. Suheil Simaan and Dr. Feras Al JerfA new research paper published by Dr. Suheil Simaan and Dr. Feras Al Jerf
A new research paper published by Dr. Suheil Simaan and Dr. Feras Al Jerf
 
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer,Part I .docx
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer,Part I .docxAnnual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer,Part I .docx
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer,Part I .docx
 
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer,Part I .docx
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer,Part I .docxAnnual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer,Part I .docx
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer,Part I .docx
 
ORIGINAL PAPERRisk of colorectal cancer among long-term ce.docx
ORIGINAL PAPERRisk of colorectal cancer among long-term ce.docxORIGINAL PAPERRisk of colorectal cancer among long-term ce.docx
ORIGINAL PAPERRisk of colorectal cancer among long-term ce.docx
 
Understanding Lynch Syndrome
Understanding Lynch SyndromeUnderstanding Lynch Syndrome
Understanding Lynch Syndrome
 
Transition from film to digital mammography
Transition from film to digital mammographyTransition from film to digital mammography
Transition from film to digital mammography
 
TNBC Giraldo-Cabanillas
TNBC Giraldo-CabanillasTNBC Giraldo-Cabanillas
TNBC Giraldo-Cabanillas
 
The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study
The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) studyThe Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study
The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study
 
Incidencia internal de cancer
Incidencia internal de cancerIncidencia internal de cancer
Incidencia internal de cancer
 
Aya jnci paper full april 20_2011
Aya jnci paper full april 20_2011Aya jnci paper full april 20_2011
Aya jnci paper full april 20_2011
 
CA A Cancer J Clinicians - 2021 - Siegel - Cancer Statistics 2021.pdf
CA A Cancer J Clinicians - 2021 - Siegel - Cancer Statistics 2021.pdfCA A Cancer J Clinicians - 2021 - Siegel - Cancer Statistics 2021.pdf
CA A Cancer J Clinicians - 2021 - Siegel - Cancer Statistics 2021.pdf
 
Clinical-Pathological Analysis of 37 Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas in Tucumán...
Clinical-Pathological Analysis of 37 Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas in Tucumán...Clinical-Pathological Analysis of 37 Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas in Tucumán...
Clinical-Pathological Analysis of 37 Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas in Tucumán...
 
Clinical-Pathological Analysis of 37 Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas in Tucumán...
Clinical-Pathological Analysis of 37 Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas in Tucumán...Clinical-Pathological Analysis of 37 Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas in Tucumán...
Clinical-Pathological Analysis of 37 Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas in Tucumán...
 
Cancer incidence in Malawi: Time trends in Blantyre 1996-2005 and predictions...
Cancer incidence in Malawi: Time trends in Blantyre 1996-2005 and predictions...Cancer incidence in Malawi: Time trends in Blantyre 1996-2005 and predictions...
Cancer incidence in Malawi: Time trends in Blantyre 1996-2005 and predictions...
 
Primary care screening tests in adults geriatrics
Primary care screening tests in adults  geriatricsPrimary care screening tests in adults  geriatrics
Primary care screening tests in adults geriatrics
 

Recently uploaded

VIP Russian Call Girls in Varanasi Samaira 8250192130 Independent Escort Serv...
VIP Russian Call Girls in Varanasi Samaira 8250192130 Independent Escort Serv...VIP Russian Call Girls in Varanasi Samaira 8250192130 Independent Escort Serv...
VIP Russian Call Girls in Varanasi Samaira 8250192130 Independent Escort Serv...Neha Kaur
 
Call Girls Coimbatore Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Coimbatore Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Coimbatore Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Coimbatore Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableDipal Arora
 
Call Girls Darjeeling Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Darjeeling Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Darjeeling Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Darjeeling Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableDipal Arora
 
Premium Call Girls Cottonpet Whatsapp 7001035870 Independent Escort Service
Premium Call Girls Cottonpet Whatsapp 7001035870 Independent Escort ServicePremium Call Girls Cottonpet Whatsapp 7001035870 Independent Escort Service
Premium Call Girls Cottonpet Whatsapp 7001035870 Independent Escort Servicevidya singh
 
Artifacts in Nuclear Medicine with Identifying and resolving artifacts.
Artifacts in Nuclear Medicine with Identifying and resolving artifacts.Artifacts in Nuclear Medicine with Identifying and resolving artifacts.
Artifacts in Nuclear Medicine with Identifying and resolving artifacts.MiadAlsulami
 
Call Girls Cuttack Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Cuttack Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Cuttack Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Cuttack Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableDipal Arora
 
Call Girls Siliguri Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Siliguri Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Siliguri Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Siliguri Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableDipal Arora
 
Call Girls Service Navi Mumbai Samaira 8617697112 Independent Escort Service ...
Call Girls Service Navi Mumbai Samaira 8617697112 Independent Escort Service ...Call Girls Service Navi Mumbai Samaira 8617697112 Independent Escort Service ...
Call Girls Service Navi Mumbai Samaira 8617697112 Independent Escort Service ...Call girls in Ahmedabad High profile
 
Russian Escorts Girls Nehru Place ZINATHI 🔝9711199012 ☪ 24/7 Call Girls Delhi
Russian Escorts Girls  Nehru Place ZINATHI 🔝9711199012 ☪ 24/7 Call Girls DelhiRussian Escorts Girls  Nehru Place ZINATHI 🔝9711199012 ☪ 24/7 Call Girls Delhi
Russian Escorts Girls Nehru Place ZINATHI 🔝9711199012 ☪ 24/7 Call Girls DelhiAlinaDevecerski
 
Chandrapur Call girls 8617370543 Provides all area service COD available
Chandrapur Call girls 8617370543 Provides all area service COD availableChandrapur Call girls 8617370543 Provides all area service COD available
Chandrapur Call girls 8617370543 Provides all area service COD availableDipal Arora
 
Bangalore Call Girls Hebbal Kempapura Number 7001035870 Meetin With Bangalor...
Bangalore Call Girls Hebbal Kempapura Number 7001035870  Meetin With Bangalor...Bangalore Call Girls Hebbal Kempapura Number 7001035870  Meetin With Bangalor...
Bangalore Call Girls Hebbal Kempapura Number 7001035870 Meetin With Bangalor...narwatsonia7
 
Call Girls Service Surat Samaira ❤️🍑 8250192130 👄 Independent Escort Service ...
Call Girls Service Surat Samaira ❤️🍑 8250192130 👄 Independent Escort Service ...Call Girls Service Surat Samaira ❤️🍑 8250192130 👄 Independent Escort Service ...
Call Girls Service Surat Samaira ❤️🍑 8250192130 👄 Independent Escort Service ...CALL GIRLS
 
Bangalore Call Girl Whatsapp Number 100% Complete Your Sexual Needs
Bangalore Call Girl Whatsapp Number 100% Complete Your Sexual NeedsBangalore Call Girl Whatsapp Number 100% Complete Your Sexual Needs
Bangalore Call Girl Whatsapp Number 100% Complete Your Sexual NeedsGfnyt
 
Call Girl Number in Vashi Mumbai📲 9833363713 💞 Full Night Enjoy
Call Girl Number in Vashi Mumbai📲 9833363713 💞 Full Night EnjoyCall Girl Number in Vashi Mumbai📲 9833363713 💞 Full Night Enjoy
Call Girl Number in Vashi Mumbai📲 9833363713 💞 Full Night Enjoybabeytanya
 
Book Paid Powai Call Girls Mumbai 𖠋 9930245274 𖠋Low Budget Full Independent H...
Book Paid Powai Call Girls Mumbai 𖠋 9930245274 𖠋Low Budget Full Independent H...Book Paid Powai Call Girls Mumbai 𖠋 9930245274 𖠋Low Budget Full Independent H...
Book Paid Powai Call Girls Mumbai 𖠋 9930245274 𖠋Low Budget Full Independent H...Call Girls in Nagpur High Profile
 
Call Girls Kochi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Kochi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Kochi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Kochi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableDipal Arora
 
Top Rated Bangalore Call Girls Richmond Circle ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ Call Me For Gen...
Top Rated Bangalore Call Girls Richmond Circle ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ Call Me For Gen...Top Rated Bangalore Call Girls Richmond Circle ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ Call Me For Gen...
Top Rated Bangalore Call Girls Richmond Circle ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ Call Me For Gen...narwatsonia7
 
Call Girl Coimbatore Prisha☎️ 8250192130 Independent Escort Service Coimbatore
Call Girl Coimbatore Prisha☎️  8250192130 Independent Escort Service CoimbatoreCall Girl Coimbatore Prisha☎️  8250192130 Independent Escort Service Coimbatore
Call Girl Coimbatore Prisha☎️ 8250192130 Independent Escort Service Coimbatorenarwatsonia7
 
Call Girls Ludhiana Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Ludhiana Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Ludhiana Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Ludhiana Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableDipal Arora
 

Recently uploaded (20)

VIP Russian Call Girls in Varanasi Samaira 8250192130 Independent Escort Serv...
VIP Russian Call Girls in Varanasi Samaira 8250192130 Independent Escort Serv...VIP Russian Call Girls in Varanasi Samaira 8250192130 Independent Escort Serv...
VIP Russian Call Girls in Varanasi Samaira 8250192130 Independent Escort Serv...
 
Call Girls Coimbatore Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Coimbatore Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Coimbatore Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Coimbatore Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Call Girls Darjeeling Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Darjeeling Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Darjeeling Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Darjeeling Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Premium Call Girls Cottonpet Whatsapp 7001035870 Independent Escort Service
Premium Call Girls Cottonpet Whatsapp 7001035870 Independent Escort ServicePremium Call Girls Cottonpet Whatsapp 7001035870 Independent Escort Service
Premium Call Girls Cottonpet Whatsapp 7001035870 Independent Escort Service
 
Artifacts in Nuclear Medicine with Identifying and resolving artifacts.
Artifacts in Nuclear Medicine with Identifying and resolving artifacts.Artifacts in Nuclear Medicine with Identifying and resolving artifacts.
Artifacts in Nuclear Medicine with Identifying and resolving artifacts.
 
Call Girls Cuttack Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Cuttack Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Cuttack Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Cuttack Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Call Girls Siliguri Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Siliguri Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Siliguri Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Siliguri Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Call Girls Service Navi Mumbai Samaira 8617697112 Independent Escort Service ...
Call Girls Service Navi Mumbai Samaira 8617697112 Independent Escort Service ...Call Girls Service Navi Mumbai Samaira 8617697112 Independent Escort Service ...
Call Girls Service Navi Mumbai Samaira 8617697112 Independent Escort Service ...
 
Russian Escorts Girls Nehru Place ZINATHI 🔝9711199012 ☪ 24/7 Call Girls Delhi
Russian Escorts Girls  Nehru Place ZINATHI 🔝9711199012 ☪ 24/7 Call Girls DelhiRussian Escorts Girls  Nehru Place ZINATHI 🔝9711199012 ☪ 24/7 Call Girls Delhi
Russian Escorts Girls Nehru Place ZINATHI 🔝9711199012 ☪ 24/7 Call Girls Delhi
 
Chandrapur Call girls 8617370543 Provides all area service COD available
Chandrapur Call girls 8617370543 Provides all area service COD availableChandrapur Call girls 8617370543 Provides all area service COD available
Chandrapur Call girls 8617370543 Provides all area service COD available
 
Bangalore Call Girls Hebbal Kempapura Number 7001035870 Meetin With Bangalor...
Bangalore Call Girls Hebbal Kempapura Number 7001035870  Meetin With Bangalor...Bangalore Call Girls Hebbal Kempapura Number 7001035870  Meetin With Bangalor...
Bangalore Call Girls Hebbal Kempapura Number 7001035870 Meetin With Bangalor...
 
Call Girls Service Surat Samaira ❤️🍑 8250192130 👄 Independent Escort Service ...
Call Girls Service Surat Samaira ❤️🍑 8250192130 👄 Independent Escort Service ...Call Girls Service Surat Samaira ❤️🍑 8250192130 👄 Independent Escort Service ...
Call Girls Service Surat Samaira ❤️🍑 8250192130 👄 Independent Escort Service ...
 
Bangalore Call Girl Whatsapp Number 100% Complete Your Sexual Needs
Bangalore Call Girl Whatsapp Number 100% Complete Your Sexual NeedsBangalore Call Girl Whatsapp Number 100% Complete Your Sexual Needs
Bangalore Call Girl Whatsapp Number 100% Complete Your Sexual Needs
 
Escort Service Call Girls In Sarita Vihar,, 99530°56974 Delhi NCR
Escort Service Call Girls In Sarita Vihar,, 99530°56974 Delhi NCREscort Service Call Girls In Sarita Vihar,, 99530°56974 Delhi NCR
Escort Service Call Girls In Sarita Vihar,, 99530°56974 Delhi NCR
 
Call Girl Number in Vashi Mumbai📲 9833363713 💞 Full Night Enjoy
Call Girl Number in Vashi Mumbai📲 9833363713 💞 Full Night EnjoyCall Girl Number in Vashi Mumbai📲 9833363713 💞 Full Night Enjoy
Call Girl Number in Vashi Mumbai📲 9833363713 💞 Full Night Enjoy
 
Book Paid Powai Call Girls Mumbai 𖠋 9930245274 𖠋Low Budget Full Independent H...
Book Paid Powai Call Girls Mumbai 𖠋 9930245274 𖠋Low Budget Full Independent H...Book Paid Powai Call Girls Mumbai 𖠋 9930245274 𖠋Low Budget Full Independent H...
Book Paid Powai Call Girls Mumbai 𖠋 9930245274 𖠋Low Budget Full Independent H...
 
Call Girls Kochi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Kochi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Kochi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Kochi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Top Rated Bangalore Call Girls Richmond Circle ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ Call Me For Gen...
Top Rated Bangalore Call Girls Richmond Circle ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ Call Me For Gen...Top Rated Bangalore Call Girls Richmond Circle ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ Call Me For Gen...
Top Rated Bangalore Call Girls Richmond Circle ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ Call Me For Gen...
 
Call Girl Coimbatore Prisha☎️ 8250192130 Independent Escort Service Coimbatore
Call Girl Coimbatore Prisha☎️  8250192130 Independent Escort Service CoimbatoreCall Girl Coimbatore Prisha☎️  8250192130 Independent Escort Service Coimbatore
Call Girl Coimbatore Prisha☎️ 8250192130 Independent Escort Service Coimbatore
 
Call Girls Ludhiana Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Ludhiana Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Ludhiana Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Ludhiana Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 

THE DESCRIPTIVE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF CRANIOPHARYNGIOMA 1998.pdf

  • 1. HE demographic patterns of craniopharyngioma are not well described because the tumor is rare. In addition, most cancer registries collect data only on malignant conditions and, therefore, they are not useful in the study of craniopharyngioma, considered to be of borderline histological malignancy. The objective of this report is to describe the epidemiology of craniopharyn- gioma. Incidence rates by gender, age, and race were cal- culated from three population-based cancer registries that include data on brain tumors of benign and borderline malignancy. Survival rates were estimated from a pedi- atric population-based tumor registry and a hospital-based registry. Data Collection Methods Tumor Incidence Data on the incidence of craniopharyngioma were available from three population-based registries: the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS), Greater Delaware Valley Pediatric Tumor Registry (GDVPTR), and the University of Southern Cali- fornia/Los Angeles County Cancer Surveillance Program (CSP). CBTRUS. The CBTRUS obtained data for the years 1990 to 1993 from 10 state cancer registries that catalog benign and malignant primary brain tumors: Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Idaho, Maine, Minne- sota, Montana, North Carolina, and Utah, a population totaling 26.8 million people.6 These registries are popula- tion based and reporting is required by law. The popula- tion data for each state were obtained from the Web site of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results pro- gram, which receives yearly population estimates from the U.S. Bureau of the Census. For the analyses reported here, all diagnoses of craniopharyngioma (International Clas- sification for Diseases of Oncology code 935011 ) were included. GDVPTR. The GDVPTR is a population-based registry of pediatric cancer that covers a 31-county region in the eastern U.S. consisting of eastern Pennsylvania, southern New Jersey, Delaware, and one northern Maryland coun- ty.9 Approximately 1.8 million children under the age of 15 years live in the region. Incidents of cancers are regis- J. Neurosurg. / Volume 89 / October, 1998 J Neurosurg 89:547–551, 1998 The descriptive epidemiology of craniopharyngioma GRETA R. BUNIN, PH.D., TANYA S. SURAWICZ, M.P.H., PHILIP A. WITMAN, M.P.H., M.PHIL., SUSAN PRESTON-MARTIN, PH.D., FAITH DAVIS, PH.D., AND JANET M. BRUNER, M.D. Division of Oncology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois; Division of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; University of Southern California, Norris Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California; and Department of Pathology, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas Object. In this report the authors describe the epidemiology of craniopharyngioma. Methods. The incidence of craniopharyngioma in the United States was estimated from two population-based cancer registries that include brain tumors of benign and borderline malignancy: the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS) and the Los Angeles county Cancer Surveillance Program. Information on addi- tional pediatric tumors was available from the Greater Delaware Valley Pediatric Tumor Registry (GDVPTR). The overall incidence of craniopharyngioma was 0.13 per 100,000 person years and did not vary by gender or race. A bimodal distribution by age was noted with peak incidence rates in children (aged 5–14 years) and among older adults (aged 65–74 years in CBTRUS and 50–74 years in Los Angeles county). Survival information was available from GDVPTR and the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), a hospital-based reporting system. In the NCDB, the 5-year survival rate was 80% and decreased with older age at diagnosis. Survival is higher among children and has improved in recent years. Conclusions. Craniopharyngioma is a rare brain tumor of uncertain behavior that occurs at a rate of 1.3 per mil- lion person years. Approximately 338 cases of this disease are expected to occur annually in the United States, with 96 occurring in children from 0 to 14 years of age. KEY WORDS • craniopharyngioma • incidence • survival T 547
  • 2. tered if diagnosed on or after January 1, 1970, in a child younger than 15 years, and who resided in the region at the time of diagnosis. For the period 1970 to 1989, cases were ascertained from all the major medical centers in the region and several centers outside the region that treated children with cancer. In addition, nearly all the other hos- pitals in the region that care for children reported cases. Although the GDVPTR relied on voluntary, mostly pas- sive reporting, the incidence rates reported for this period are similar to other U.S. rates, such as those from the Sur- veillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program.3,9,20 Only malignant neoplasms are generally registered, but benign and borderline brain tumors were ascertained for the period of 1970 to 1989 as part of a special project. CSP. The University of Southern California/Los Ange- les County CSP has collected reports on all new intracra- nial neoplasms diagnosed in the county population of almost 10 million people since 1972.8 Inclusion criteria have been consistent, and reporting of both benign and malignant tumors has been at least 95% complete since the beginning. Data were collected on 228 Los Angeles County residents with craniopharyngioma first diagnosed between 1972 and 1995. Specially trained CSP personnel abstracted information from hospital charts on age, gen- der, race, address, religion, birthplace, occupation, and in- dustry, as well as details of the pathological diagnosis. Age-adjusted incidence rates were calculated by the direct method and standardized to the U.S. 1970 population. Survival Data Data were available from the GDVPTR and the Na- tional Cancer Data Base (NCDB). NCDB. The NCDB, a joint project of the Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons, requests data from hospitals in the U.S. with cancer registries. For the periods 1985 to 1988 and 1990 to 1992, data were available on intracranial tumors, including those in the pituitary, which were voluntarily electronically submitted to the NCDB from approximately 1000 hospitals. Of 68,042 records, 1064 were identified by the NCDB as duplicates and deleted. In addition, 3726 records were de- leted because of invalid or illogical data. The remaining 63,252 records included 285 craniopharyngiomas, which are analyzed here. GDVPTR. Survival estimates from the GDVPTR were generated with an SAS15 software package using the Kap- lan–Meier method. Observed survival rates were obtained from product-limit estimates of entire curves and were not adjusted for deaths due to other causes. Results Tumor Incidence In the 4-year period of 1990 to 1993, 135 craniopharyn- giomas were diagnosed in the geographic areas of the CBTRUS. The incidence in males and females was near- ly identical: 0.13 and 0.12 per 100,000 per year, respec- tively (Table 1). No racial difference in incidence was apparent, with a rate of 0.12 in Caucasians and 0.13 in African Americans. Incidence seemed to vary with patient age, being some- what higher in patients aged 5 to 14 years than in any other age group except those aged 65 to 74 years (Fig. 1). In late adolescence and early adulthood (ages 15–34 years), incidence was the lowest. Starting at age 35 years, incidence appeared fairly constant except for a higher rate in patients aged 65 to 74 years and the absence of any cases after the age of 84 years. Given the small numbers of craniopharyngiomas in any age group, the observed dif- ferences could have occurred by chance. In Los Angeles county, 228 craniopharyngiomas were diagnosed between 1972 and 1995. The incidence rates by gender (0.13 in males and 0.11 in females) are compara- ble to those ascertained by CBTRUS (Table 1), and no racial differences were noted. Higher rates were noted among children (aged 5–14 years) and older adults (aged 50–74 years) (Fig. 2). The lowest incidence occurred among those aged 15 to 34 years. In the GDVPTR area, 67 craniopharyngiomas were diagnosed in children aged 0 to 14 years between 1970 and 1989, giving an incidence rate of 0.18 per 100,000 per G. R. Bunin, et al. 548 J. Neurosurg. / Volume 89 / October, 1998 TABLE 1 Average annual incidence rates of craniopharyngioma by gender, race, and registry* No. of Incidence Registry & Variable Tumors Rate CBTRUS, 1990–1993 total 135 0.13 male 68 0.13 female 67 0.12 Caucasians 109 0.12 African Americans 11 0.13 Los Angeles County, 1972–1995 total 228 0.12 male 121 0.13 female 107 0.11 Caucasian males 63 0.14 African American males 12 0.12 Caucasian females 61 0.12 African American females 12 0.11 * Rates are per 100,000 person years and age-adjusted using the 1970 U.S. standard population. FIG. 1. Graph showing the age-specific incidence of cranio- pharyngioma derived from the CBTRUS data.
  • 3. year, a rate similar to children in Los Angeles county and the CBTRUS areas (Table 2). The incidence in children in the GDVPTR regions did not differ by gender but was significantly higher in African Americans compared with Caucasians. No craniopharyngiomas occurred in children who were neither Caucasian or African American; two tumors would have been expected if children of other races experienced the same incidence as the population as a whole. Survival Rates The NCDB included data on 285 patients with cranio- pharyngioma, 35 of whom died. Survival percentage was estimated to be 86% at 2 years and 80% at 5 years postdi- agnosis. Survival varied notably by age group, with excel- lent survival for patients younger than 20 years of age and poor survival for those older than 65 years of age (Table 3). In the population-based GDVPTR, children with cra- niopharyngioma had a 5-year survival rate of 83%, which was lower than that for children in the NCDB data. The NCDB data are from the late 1980s and early 1990s whereas the GDVPTR data include a time period begin- ning in 1970. The most recent time period in the GDVP- TR data, 1985 to 1989, is similar to the period of NCDB data. For patients diagnosed with craniopharyngioma in 1985 to 1989 in the GDVPTR region, 5-year survival is 94% based on 16 patients and one death compared to 99% in the NCDB data with 72 patients and two deaths. Discussion The overall incidence of craniopharyngioma observed in the CBTRUS and Los Angeles county data is similar to that seen in other populations. Stiller and Nectoux19 re- ported a similar rate in U.S. data combined from several areas that do not overlap with the states that contributed to the CBTRUS data. The incidence in Rochester, Minne- sota, was higher (0.3) but was based on only six tumors.12 In the present study, virtually identical incidence rates were seen in Caucasians and African Americans. Sim- ilarly, in the U.S. data collected by Stiller and Nectoux,19 the rates were 0.07 for Caucasians and 0.10 for African Americans, an insignificant difference. In the GDVPTR data, the rate in African-American children appeared to be approximately twice that in Caucasian children, a statisti- cally significant difference. However, in the CBTRUS and Los Angeles county data, African-American and Cau- casian children experienced similar rates. The discrepant incidence rates might have occurred by chance, given the small number of African-American cases (four in the CBTRUS data, five in Los Angeles county, and 20 in the GDVPTR data). A geographic difference in the inci- dence rates in African Americans is also a possible expla- nation. We did not observe any differences in incidence be- tween males and females overall. There was also no gen- der difference in a population-based study in Finland.17 However, in a large hospital-based series of cases from the United Kingdom, there were 107 males and 66 females, a ratio of 1.3.13 In case series of craniopharyngiomas in chil- dren, the male/female ratios were 0.9 based on 42 tumors7 and 1.6 based on 105 tumors.18 Although in Los Angeles county tumor rates were higher in boys than girls, there was no evidence of a gender difference among children in the CBTRUS or GDVPTR data. Considering all the data, craniopharyngioma may occur slightly more often in boys. J. Neurosurg. / Volume 89 / October, 1998 Epidemiology of craniopharyngioma 549 FIG. 2. Graph showing the age-specific incidence of cranio- pharyngioma derived from the University of Southern Califor- nia/Los Angeles county CSP data for the years 1972–1995. TABLE 2 Average annual incidence rates in children with craniopharyngioma, categorized by gender* Age CBTRUS GDVPTR Los Angeles County Group (yrs) Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total 0–4 0.09 (4) 0.15 (6) 0.12 (10) 0.12 (7) 0.14 (8) 0.13 (15) 0.12 (10) 0.05 (4) 0.09 (14) 5–9 0.19 (8) 0.20 (8) 0.20 (16) 0.30 (19) 0.24 (15) 0.27 (34) 0.23 (17) 0.10 (7) 0.16 (24) 10–14 0.17 (7) 0.18 (7) 0.17 (14) 0.13 (9) 0.14 (9) 0.13 (18) 0.18 (13) 0.16 (11) 0.17 (24) * Number of tumors is presented in parentheses. TABLE 3 National Cancer Data Base 5-year survival rates in patients with craniopharyngioma by age at diagnosis Age at No. of No. of Survival Diagnosis Patients Deaths Rate 95% CI* ,20 82 2 0.99 0.96–1.0 20–64 168 21 0.80 0.71–0.88 $65 35 12 0.38 0.08–0.67 * CI = confidence interval.
  • 4. These data indicate that a smaller proportion of all cra- niopharyngiomas occur in childhood. Roughly one-third of the patients in our study were younger than 20 years of age at the time of diagnosis (35% in CBTRUS, 33% in Los Angeles county); the proportion younger than 15 years of age was only 30% and 27%, respectively. In pre- vious studies it has been reported that 50% of cranio- pharyngiomas occurred in children.2,16 A bimodal age distribution of incidence rates is appar- ent in the CBTRUS and Los Angeles county data. Al- though the numbers of cases in each age category are lim- ited, the pattern is consistent in both populations with larger peaks noted in older adults (Figs. 1 and 2). Whereas increasing mortality rates from all brain tumors among the elderly have been correlated with increased use of diag- nostic procedures, especially among people 65 years of age and older covered by Medicare,10 the increased inci- dence among adults in Los Angeles county occurs be- tween the ages of 50 and 74 years and is not likely due to a diagnostic bias in the elderly. A bimodal distribution has been suggested and different histologies noted in younger and older patients in large clinical series: adamantinous tumors are more common in children and squamous pap- illary tumors are more common in adults.4,5,14 These data indicate that there may be two distinct etiologies for the younger and the older patients. Craniopharyngiomas are coded under a single morphology code in the International Classification for Diseases of Oncology; therefore, it is not possible to distinguish these subtypes in our data. Craniopharyngioma is believed to develop from rests of embryonal cells in the pituitary. Two hypotheses have been proposed: the first relates to the development of the adenohypophysis during embryogenesis, which is consis- tent with pediatric tumor development; the second pro- poses that residual squamous epithelium from the ade- nohypophysis undergoes metaplasia, which explains the adult tumors.14 A consensus on this has not been achieved. It may be of value to note the age distribution of other tumors believed to develop from embryonal cells, such as neuroblastoma and medulloblastoma. Although approxi- mately one-third of all craniopharyngiomas occur in chil- dren, the percentage of embryonal childhood tumors ranges from 75 to virtually 100%. There is some suggestion of international variation in the incidence of these tumors, which is often taken to indi- cate an environmental etiology. For example, Stiller and Nectoux19 have reported that the proportion of cranio- pharyngioma among central nervous system tumors var- ied substantially; the percentages were 1.5% in Australia, 4.7 to 7.9% in Europe, 3.9% in Japan, 2.7% in U.S. Cau- casians, 4.9% in U.S. African Americans, and 11.6% in Africa. In the CBTRUS craniopharyngiomas comprised 4.2% of the tumors reported in children 0 to 14 years of age. Because it is likely that not all brain tumors are diag- nosed in developing countries, examination of incidence rates will lead to an exaggerated estimate of international variation. Percentages are useful in comparing interna- tional rates because they will be less influenced by incom- plete reporting. However, percentages are influenced by the proportions of other types of tumors, including those with nonspecific diagnosis such as brain tumor or malig- nant brain tumor. Although the international comparison indicates that craniopharyngioma occurs more frequently in Africa and less frequently in Australia, conclusions are not possible. In the NCDB data, the survival rate at 5 years was 80% overall, with survival much better among children than the elderly. Observed survival is expected to be lower in the elderly, as our survival estimates were not adjusted for death due to other causes. Reports on survival in the liter- ature are difficult to interpret because some are based on patients who received treatment and, therefore, had to sur- vive long enough to do so. To our knowledge, the only population-based report of survival after diagnosis of craniopharyngioma is an analysis of data from the Finnish Cancer Registry for patients diagnosed from 1951 to 1982.17 The overall 5-year survival rate was 69%; 73% for patients diagnosed in the 1970s. Neurosurgical techniques and the introduction of computerized tomography scan- ning have led to lower surgical mortality rates and more complete resections and, therefore, improved survival. The survival rate in the NCDB data for patients diagnosed from 1985 to 1992 was slightly higher than in the report from Finland. The NCDB is hospital based but does include all patients diagnosed at the participating hospi- tals, regardless of treatment. Conclusions In summary, craniopharyngioma is a rare brain tumor of uncertain behavior that occurs at a rate of 1.3 per million person years. Incidence rates are similar in males and females and between Caucasians and African Americans. Tumors are more common among children (aged 5 to 14 years) and older adults (aged 65 to 74 years in CBTRUS and 50 to 74 years in Los Angeles county); the lowest rates occur among those aged 15 to 34 years. Survival is highest for patients diagnosed at a younger age and has improved for children diagnosed since the mid-1980s. Based on the rates reported here, 338 cases are expected to occur annually in the U.S. with 96 occurring in children 0 to 14 years of age (estimated for 1996). Acknowledgments The registries and participants who provide data to CBTRUS include: Arizona Cancer Registry, Ms. Georgia Yee; Colorado Central Cancer Registry, Ms. Robin Bott; Connecticut Tumor Registry, Mr. John Flannery; Delaware State Tumor Registry, Ms. Carol Marker; Cancer Data Registry of Idaho, Ms. Stacey Carson; Maine Cancer Registry, Ms. Melanie Lanctot; Massachusetts Cancer Registry, Dr. Susan Gershman; Minnesota Cancer Surveil- lance System, Dr. Sally Bushhouse; Missouri Cancer Registry, Dr. Jian Chang; Montana Central Tumor Registry, Ms. Debbi Hellhake; North Carolina Central Cancer Registry, Dr. Rebecca Martin; and Utah Cancer Registry, Ms. Rosemary Dibble and Dr. Janet Stanford. The authors thank the NCDB Data Request Committee and Mr. Herman Menck of the American College of Surgeons for providing the NCDB data. We also thank Dr. Wendy Cozen for facilitating our data request. References 1. Armitage P, Berry G: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, ed 2. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 1987 2. Barrow DL, Tindall GT: Tumors of the pituitary gland, in Morantz RA, Walsh JW (eds): Brain Tumors: A Compre- hensive Text. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1994, pp 367–386 G. R. Bunin, et al. 550 J. Neurosurg. / Volume 89 / October, 1998
  • 5. 3. Bunin GR, Feuer EJ, Witman PA, et al: Increasing incidence of childhood cancer: report of 20 years’ experience from the Greater Delaware Valley Pediatric Tumor Registry. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 10:319–338, 1996 4. Burger PC, Scheithauer BW, Vogel FS: Surgical Pathology of the Nervous System and its Coverings, ed 3. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1991 5. Carmel PW: Brain tumors of disordered embryogenesis, in Youmans JR (ed): Neurological Surgery: A Comprehensive Reference Guide to the Diagnosis and Management of Neu- rosurgical Problems, ed 3. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1990, Vol 5, pp 3223–3249 6. CBTRUS: 1996 Annual Report. Chicago: Central Brain Tu- mor Registry of the United States, 1997 7. Farwell JR, Dohrmann GJ, Flannery JT: Central nervous system tumors in children. Cancer 40:3123–3132, 1977 8. Hisserich JC, Martin SP, Henderson BE: An areawide cancer reporting network. Publ Hlth Rep 90:15–17, 1975 9. Kramer S, Meadows AT, Jarrett P, et al: Incidence of childhood cancer: experience of a decade in a population-based registry. J Natl Cancer Inst 70:49–55, 1983 10. Modan B, Wagener DK, Feldman JJ, et al: Increased mortality from brain tumors: a combined outcome of diagnostic technol- ogy and change of attitude toward the elderly. Am J Epidemiol 135:1349–1357, 1992 11. Percy C, Van Holten V, Muir C (eds): ICD-O International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, ed 2. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1990 12. Radhakrishnan K, Mokri B, Parisi JE, et al: The trends in inci- dence of primary brain tumors in the population of Rochester, Minnesota. Ann Neurol 37:67–73, 1995 13. Rajan B, Ashley S, Gorman C, et al: Craniopharyngioma— long-term results following limited surgery and radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 26:1–10, 1993 14. Samii M, Tatagiba M: Craniopharyngioma, in Kaye AH, Laws ER Jr (eds): Brain Tumors: An Encyclopedic Approach. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1995, pp 873–894 15. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 6, ed 4. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Vols 1, 2, 1988 16. Scott RM, Pomeroy SL, Tarbell NJ: Craniopharyngioma, in Black PM, Loeffler JS (eds): Cancer of the Nervous System. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Science, 1997, pp 414–422 17. Sorva R, Heiskanen O: Craniopharyngioma in Finland. A study of 123 cases. Acta Neurochir 81:85–89, 1986 18. Stewart AM, Lennox EL, Sanders BM: Group characteristics of children with cerebral and spinal cord tumours. Br J Cancer 28:568–574, 1973 19. Stiller CA, Nectoux J: International incidence of childhood brain and spinal tumors. Int J Epidemiol 23:458–464, 1994 20. Young JL, Miller RW: Incidence of malignant tumors in U.S. children. J Pediatr 86:254–258, 1975 Manuscript received October 13, 1997. Accepted in final form May 29, 1998. This work was conducted under contract to the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States and supported by the Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States through the Ride for Kids Fundraising Program, sponsored by the American Honda Motor Company, Motorcycle Division. Cancer incidence data for Los Angeles County were collected with support from grant CA17054 and contract N01-CN-25403 from the National Institutes of Health and subcontracts 050(C-L)- 8709 from the California Department of Health Services as part of its statewide cancer reporting system. Address reprint requests to: Tanya S. Surawicz, M.P.H., Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States, Division of Epi- demiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois, 2121 West Taylor Street, Chicago, Illinois 60612. email: surawicz@uic.edu. J. Neurosurg. / Volume 89 / October, 1998 Epidemiology of craniopharyngioma 551