This document discusses and compares intrauterine insemination (IUI) and in vitro fertilization (IVF) as assisted reproductive technologies. IUI is described as a simpler, less expensive initial treatment option compared to IVF, which has higher success rates but also more risks and costs. The document provides guidelines on when each procedure is most suitable based on factors like infertility diagnosis, age, ovarian reserve, and prior treatment failures. It emphasizes shared decision-making between physicians and patients based on individual prognoses and preferences.
4. MAIN INDICATIONS FOR
ART
IUI
Oligospermia
Cervical or
Immunological
factors
Unexplained
Infertility
IVF
Tubal Infertility
Male Infertility
Advanced Endometriosis
Ovulatory disorders
Unexplained Infertility
Immunological Infertility
Failed IUI Treatments
Donation of eggs and
embryos
Surrogacy
5. MAJOR DIFFERENCES
IUI
Simple
In expensive
Usually started as
initial treatment
Requires
comparatively
minimal drugs
Usually uncontrolled
cycles
IVF
Complex
Expensive
Usually considered as
final treatment
Requires more drugs
Mostly controlled
cycles
6. MAJOR DIFFERENCES (cont.)
Risk of premature LH
surges
Risk of OHSS
comparatively less
Multiple preg risk higher
with multiple follicles
Smaller follicles become
atretic & of no future
use
Success rates
10 – 15 % per cycle
CPR – 40 % by 6 cycles
Less emotional / financial
burden
Risk of premature surge
eliminated
Risk of OHSS 1 – 10 %
20 % risk of multiple preg
Can be reduced by
Set
Blastocyst transfer
Cryopreservation of
supernumerary embryos
Future use possible
Success rates
40 % per cycle
CPR – 80 % by 4 cycles
More emotional / financial
commitment
7.
8. WHAT TO DO WHEN
IN SITUATIONS OF
Tubal factor
Severe male infertility
Advanced maternal age
Young women with low ov.reserve
Women keen to avoid
multiple pregnancy
Unexplained infertility
High response IUI cycles
9. IN CASES OF TUBAL
FACTOR
IVF best option
With unilateral healthy tube – few
cycles of IUI, when ovulates from
side of normal tube
10.
11. SEVERE MALE INFERTILITY
IVF / ICSI in severe oligoasthenospermia
Minimal requirement
For IUI : 10 – 15 million / ml (AM)
PR 10 % per cycle
For IVF : 2 – 3 million / ml (AM)
For ICSI : few sperms
12.
13. ADVANCED MATERNAL AGE
Every intervention less likely to work in
elderly age > 35 yrs.
IUI / IVF success rates decline with
age & halved down from 38
To shorten time with less effective
IUI’s & to plan IVF at earliest
14. YOUNG WOMEN WITH
LOW OV. RESERVE
Predictors of ovarian reserve
FSH
AMH
AFC – less in no.
Counsel & speed up treatments
Plan for IVF early
15.
16. PREVENTION OF MULTIPLE
PREGNANCY
IUI with out drugs or with low stimulation
IUI with classical doses of FSH
High multiple PR &
High order multiple births
In IVF / ICSI
1 – 2 ET safer
17.
18. UNEXPLAINED INFERTILITY
Majority do not conceive after initial specific
treatment
Eligible for empiric treatment in form of IUI or IVF
The decision to be made by these couples
When to start treatment
What order more sensible ?
When should they shift to more sophisticated &
costly treatment
19. DECISION PROCESS
(early or late)
Should be in partnership with couple &
physician
Proceeding for IVF may take longer if
IVF is not done in the same clinic
A trend towards IVF may be sooner in
an IVF center
20. TREATMENT TIME - TABLE
Expert can recommend time table according to
couple’s choice
Treatment time table to slow-down or speed-up
according to patient’s needs
Frequent traveller
Couple staying at separate places
Couple shifting to places where
Treatment not available or
More expensive
21. DECISION MAKING PROCESS SHOULD
NOT DEPART FROM EVIDENCE
BEST EVIDENCE SUMMARIZED
1. Unstimulated IUI : Does not significantly PR
2. CC / IUI : 5 – 7 % PR per cycle upto 7 cycles
3. IUI / Ovarian Stimulation : 15 – 17 % per cycle
Risk of OHSS
Multiple pregnancy
4. IVF : 7 – fold higher likely hood of pregnancy
(ESHRE capri work shop group, 08)
5. ICSI : better than IVF in couples with male infertility
22. PROGNOSIS
couples should consider their chances of
spontaneous pregnancy
Chances of spontaneous conception with out
treatment greater with shorter duration
of infertility
The association of duration of infertility &
chances of conception - proportional
23. TREATMENT PLAN
Controversies regarding :
Order of treatment
Effectiveness of stimulated IUI cycles in relation to
IVF / ICSI
Management trials needed to evaluate :
Success rates
Availability of methods
Adverse effects
Satisfaction
Cost, invasiveness of techniques &
Likelihood of couple compliance
24. TRIAL COMPARING
IVF / IUI
1. Standard protocol
3 cycles of CC / IUI
3 cycles of IUI with FSH
& upto 6 cycles of IVF
Clinical pregnancy – 64 %
2. Accelerated protocol
3 cycles of CC / IUI (no FSH / IUI)
& upto 6 cycles IVF
Clinical pregnancy rate - 65 %
29. HIGH RESPONSE
IUI CYCLES
WHEN CONVERTED TO IVF
1. OR – 1-2 ET or
2. Cryopreserve all embryos & measures to
reduce risk of OHSS
Avoids complete cancellation of cycle &
Comparable PRS with standard IVF
protocols
32. POINTS TO REMEMBER
Where IVF is affordable, IUI is unnecessary
Potentially IVF a premature choice
In younger women &
With unexplained infertility of < 3 yrs
duration
Success rates in IVF much higher than before
Success rates with stimulated IUI have not
changed much
33. COST EFFECTIVENESS
Starting treatment with IUI rather
than IVF
More cost effective in unexplained &
persistent infertility
Primary offer of IVF
In male infertility &
advanced maternal age
34. CONCLUSIONS
In good prognosis couples, PR s better with
out treatment
IUI widely used except in
Bil. Tubal blocks
Severe male infertility &
Severe Ov. defects
Although IUI treatment cheaper & less
demanding, IVF most effective
treatment
35. BE – AWARE OF CHANGE
Attitude of patients
Low patience
Apprehensive
Worried about side effects, future
Waiting time
For conception &
Wait in clinics
Don’t drag until
Ovarian
Physical
Emotional &
Financial exhaustion